Male Nuptial Gifts Research Articles

Unpredictable food and sexual size dimorphism in insects

The evolution of sexual size dimorphism is likely to be affected by the amount of resources each sex invests in offspring. Male nuptial gifts, occurring in many insect species, might reduce the value of large size in females and increase the value for males. For large nuptial gifts and an accompanying shift in dimorphism to evolve, males with larger gifts should be rewarded, in effect trading the larger gift for more offspring. We suggest that food variability, causing some males to have much to provide and some females to be in great need, would be conducive to the evolution of such a mating system, and we present comparative data on butterflies supporting the suggestion. In a gift-giving mating system, growing male and female juveniles should react differently to food shortage. A female maturing at small size can to some extent buffer her disadvantage through nuptial gifts, whereas a male maturing at small size will suffer from his inability to provide substantial gifts. Thus, males benefit more than females from continued growth in the face of food shortage, leading to a shift in size dimorphism. Here we confirm this prediction in a butterfly, Pieris napi, with large nuptial gifts.

Polyandry and its effect on female reproduction in the green-veined white butterfly (Pieris napi L.)

In many insects nutrients transferred by the male to the female at mating are later incorporated into both the eggs and soma of the mated females. Accordingly, it has been suggested that female insects can use these male-derived nutrients both for somatic maintenance and to increase both the number and quality of their offspring. Moreover, much discussion is presently devoted to whether the male nuptial gift represents paternal investment, defined as “any increase in given male's total surviving progeny by increasing the reproductive output by a given female”, or mating effort which obtains “if a male gains by increasing the proportion of eggs he fertilizes from a given female” (Parker and Simmons 1989). If the male nuptial gift represents parental investment it should be expected to benefit predominantly the offspring sired by the donor, whereas the “physiological fate” of the male nuptial gift is somewhat irrelevant under the mating effort explanation. In this paper we test these issues by studying the lifetime fecundity, egg weights and longevity of two groups of females of the polyandrous green-veined white butterfly, Pieris napi, one group of which was allowed to mate only once and the other of which was allowed to mate at liberty, the latter group of females mating on average 2.28 times. Moreover, to test the incorporation rate of male-derived nutrients, we performed a second set of experiments where females were allowed to mate with radioactively labelled males. The results showed that polyandrous females had higher lifetime fecundity compared to monandrous females, laying on average 1.61 as many eggs, and that the difference in cumulative fecundity between the two groups was statistically significant from the 5th day of egg-laying onwards. Polyandrous females also lived longer and maintained egg weight at a high level for longer than monandrous females. Largely concomitant with egg-laying rate, incorporation rate of male-derived nutrients peaked 3–4 days after mating, subsequently tapering off to stabilize at about 40% of the maximum. Given the opportunity, female P. napi remated after 3–5 days, the duration of the refractory period being positively correlated with ejaculate mass. Hence, although the nutrient investment of the first male to mate with a female “subsidizes” the progeny of later-mating males, the male nuptial gift in P. napi clearly qualifies as both paternal investment and mating effort.