Vol. 117, No. 4 PerspectivesOpen AccessPAH Exposure Paul A. Fowler Peter J. O’Shaughnessy Stewart M. Rhind Jon Ayres Paul A. Fowler Search for more papers by this author , Peter J. O’Shaughnessy Search for more papers by this author , Stewart M. Rhind Search for more papers by this author , and Jon Ayres Search for more papers by this author Published:1 April 2009https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0800445AboutSectionsPDF ToolsDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InReddit We were very interested to read the article by Choi et al. (2008). The difference between maternal exposure and our own data on actual concentrations of poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the human male fetal liver (Fowler et al. 2008) was striking. Eight of the PAH exposures meas ured by Choi et al. were also on our list of PAHs measured in the human fetal liver during the second trimester.Assuming that the 48-hr samples of airborne PAH exposure used by Choi et al. (2008) truly reflect longer-term exposure more relevant to the outcomes under consideration (which is contentious because the measurements may either over estimate or underestimate true exposure), then we can approximate a comparison between the two studies. Therefore, we calculated the fold- difference between the maximal second trimester exposures (nanograms per cubic meter) reported by Choi et al. in their Table 2 and the mean male fetal liver values presented in our Table 3 [(Fowler et al. 2008), corrected to nanograms per kilogram dry weight]. We calculated values separately for fetuses from mothers who smoked cigarettes and for those who did not (Table 1). The smallest difference was 5-fold for benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), whereas the largest difference was 8,340-fold for benz[a]anthracene (BaA), in all cases representing accumulation in the fetal liver considerably above personal maternal exposure to airborne PAHs. Of course there are other sources of exposure to PAHs, such as air pollution and occupational sources, but these data very clearly suggest that large quantities of PAHs are crossing the placenta and accumulating in the fetus. Perhaps even more interesting was the very different relative proportions of these eight PAHs in the air compared with in fetal livers: BaA comprised 11% in air but 94–96% in the livers, whereas pyrene was 17% in the air but below detection in the livers. This suggests that very different proportions of PAHs are accumulating in fetal tissues and it also underscores the fundamental principle that to really understand health risks we cannot afford to ignore the actual tissue levels in favor of exposure estimates alone.Table 1 Maximum air PAH exposure (ng/m3) compared with mean human male fetal liver PAH levels (ng/kg dry weight) from mothers who did and did not smoke, during the second trimester.PAH concentration Relative proportion of PAH PAHMaximum air (ng/m3)Liver mean Maximum air (ng/m3)Liver mean NonsmokerSmokerNonsmokerSmokerBaA39.69331,000195,00011.1495.4793.80Benzo[b]fluoranthene67.471,3001,80018.930.380.87Benzo[k]fluoranthene20.335001,0005.710.140.48Benzo[ghi]perylene32.268002009.140.230.10BaP42.2350020011.850.140.09Chrysene31.1311,0009,0008.733.174.33Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene10.768002003.020.240.09Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene50.2080050014.090.230.24Pyrene61.960a017.3900aBelow detection in human fetal livers.ReferencesChoi H, Perera F, Pac A, Wang L, Flak E, Mroz Eet al.. 2008. Estimating individual-level exposure to airborne poly-cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons throughout the gestational period based on personal, indoor, and outdoor monitoring. Environ Health Perspect 116:1509-151819057704. Link, Google ScholarFowler PA, Cassie S, Rhind SM, Brewer MJ, Collinson JM, Lea RGet al.. 2008. Maternal smoking during pregnancy specifically reduces human fetal desert hedgehog gene expression during testis development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:619-62618000085. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Vol. 117, No. 4 April 2009Metrics About Article Metrics Publication History Originally published1 April 2009Published in print1 April 2009 Financial disclosuresPDF download License information EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted. Note to readers with disabilities EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact [email protected]. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.
Read full abstract