Male Breast Cancer Families Research Articles

Family history of breast cancer in non-BRCA male breast cancer: A case-control study.

e13032 Background: Approximately 85% of male breast cancer (MBC) patients test negative for a BRCA mutation, and the role of genetic predisposition is unclear. Cancer risk counseling for unaffected relatives of BRCA-negative MBC patients relies on accurate cancer risk estimates, but there is limited data on the risk of breast cancer (BC) for relatives of these men. We characterized the association between MBC and family history of BC in patients who test negative for BRCA mutations in order to facilitate cancer risk counseling and to explore the possibility of unidentified MBC susceptibility alleles. Methods: We performed a case-control study of patients who had full length sequencing and large-rearrangement analysis for germline mutations in BRCA1/2 or the mismatch repair (MMR) genes at a commercial laboratory from 2006-2012. Cases were MBC patients who tested negative for a BRCA1/2 mutation (n = 3,647); controls were male colon cancer patients who tested negative for mutations in MMR genes (n = 4,269). Information on family history of BC was ascertained from test request forms completed by the ordering healthcare provider at the time of testing. Unconditional multivariable logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between family history of BC in first- (FDR) and second-degree relatives (SDR) and MBC with adjustment for potential confounders (age, ethnicity, year of testing). Results: Compared to controls, MBC cases had higher odds of BC in a FDR or SDR (OR = 4.7; 95% CI 4.1, 5.3). Associations were strongest for family history of BC in 1 female FDR (OR = 3.9; 95% CI: 3.3, 4.6), ≥2 female FDR (OR = 7.5; 95% CI 5.0, 11.4), BC in a FDR < 45 years old (for cases diagnosed < 45, OR = 6.9; 95% CI 3.9, 12.4), a male FDR or SDR with BC (OR = 17.9; 95% CI 7.6, 42.1), and both a male and female FDR or SDR with BC (OR = 15.7; 95%CI 4.4, 55.3). Conclusions: MBC patients who test negative for a BRCA mutation have significantly higher odds of reporting family members affected by breast cancer, particularly with affected FDR < 45 years old, multiple affected relatives, and male relatives with BC. This data can guide risk counseling in MBC families, and suggests the existence of unidentified MBC susceptibility alleles.

Sensitivity of BRCA1/2 testing in high-risk breast/ovarian/male breast cancer families: little contribution of comprehensive RNA/NGS panel testing.

The sensitivity of testing BRCA1 and BRCA2 remains unresolved as the frequency of deep intronic splicing variants has not been defined in high-risk familial breast/ovarian cancer families. This variant category is reported at significant frequency in other tumour predisposition genes, including NF1 and MSH2. We carried out comprehensive whole gene RNA analysis on 45 high-risk breast/ovary and male breast cancer families with no identified pathogenic variant on exonic sequencing and copy number analysis of BRCA1/2. In addition, we undertook variant screening of a 10-gene high/moderate risk breast/ovarian cancer panel by next-generation sequencing. DNA testing identified the causative variant in 50/56 (89%) breast/ovarian/male breast cancer families with Manchester scores of ≥50 with two variants being confirmed to affect splicing on RNA analysis. RNA sequencing of BRCA1/BRCA2 on 45 individuals from high-risk families identified no deep intronic variants and did not suggest loss of RNA expression as a cause of lost sensitivity. Panel testing in 42 samples identified a known RAD51D variant, a high-risk ATM variant in another breast ovary family and a truncating CHEK2 mutation. Current exonic sequencing and copy number analysis variant detection methods of BRCA1/2 have high sensitivity in high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families. Sequence analysis of RNA does not identify any variants undetected by current analysis of BRCA1/2. However, RNA analysis clarified the pathogenicity of variants of unknown significance detected by current methods. The low diagnostic uplift achieved through sequence analysis of the other known breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility genes indicates that further high-risk genes remain to be identified.

BRCA1/2 mutation analysis in male breast cancer families from North West England

64 families with a history of male breast cancer aged 60 or less or with a family history of male and female breast cancer were screened for the presence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Seventeen pathogenic BRCA2 and four BRCA1 mutations were identified (34%) in samples from an affected family member. All but one of the mutations segregated with disease where samples were available and pedigree structure permitted. Despite high sensitivity of mutation testing only 64% of families fulfilling BCLC criteria had an identifiable pathogenic mutation. It is possible that at least some of these families may have mutations in other genes, although we found no involvement of CHEK2 1100delC.

Screening for a BRCA2 Rearrangement in High-Risk Breast/Ovarian Cancer Families: Evidence for a Founder Effect and Analysis of the Associated Phenotypes

BRCA2 rearrangements are rare genetic events. A large BRCA2 genomic insertion was recurrently observed in our participants, and we sought to characterize it at the molecular and phenotypic level. We studied 210 high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families. Fifty-three probands were fully screened for BRCA1/2 mutations, and three of 53 had a large insertion in exon 3 of BRCA2. This finding was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), and sequencing. An additional 157 consecutive families were screened for this mutation by a three-step PCR method. Phenotype and haplotype analysis was also performed. Sixteen BRCA mutations were observed in 19 of 53 patients (36% detection rate). A recurrent Alu motif insertion in position c.156_157 was observed after sequencing of an abnormal fragment obtained after the amplification of BRCA2 exon 3. RT-PCR revealed exon 3 skipping. Screening of this rearrangement identified 14 additional families (out of 157). In total, 17 (8%) of 210 high-risk families ascertained in our clinic were positive for this mutation. Segregation of a common haplotype (from D13S260 to D13S1695) confirmed a common origin, estimated to have occurred 2,400 to 2,600 years ago. The following four cancer phenotypes were observed in the 17 positive families: female breast (n = 9), male breast (n = 4), breast/ovarian (n = 2), and heterogeneous (n = 2). Male breast cancer was more frequently observed in c.156_157insAlu-positive families compared with negative families (23% v 12%, respectively), and 33% of all male breast cancer families with an identified BRCA mutation were c.156_157insAlu positive. c.156_157insAlu is a founder mutation of Portuguese origin and is the most frequent BRCA2 rearrangement described to date.

Phenotypic features and genetic characterization of male breast cancer families: identification of two recurrent BRCA2 mutations in north-east of Italy.

BackgroundBreast cancer in men is an infrequent occurrence, accounting for ~1% of all breast tumors with an incidence of about 1:100,000. The relative rarity of male breast cancer (MBC) limits our understanding of the epidemiologic, genetic and clinical features of this tumor.MethodsFrom 1997 to 2003, 10 MBC patients were referred to our Institute for genetic counselling and BRCA1/2 testing. Here we report on the genetic and phenotypic characterization of 10 families with MBC from the North East of Italy. In particular, we wished to assess the occurrence of specific cancer types in relatives of MBC probands in families with and without BRCA2 predisposing mutations. Moreover, families with recurrent BRCA2 mutations were also characterized by haplotype analysis using 5 BRCA2-linked dinucleotide repeat markers and 8 intragenic BRCA2 polymorphisms.ResultsTwo pathogenic mutations in the BRCA2 gene were observed: the 9106C>T (Q2960X) and the IVS16-2A>G (splicing) mutations, each in 2 cases. A BRCA1 mutation of uncertain significance 4590C>G (P1491A) was also observed. In families with BRCA2 mutations, female breast cancer was more frequent in the first and second-degree relatives compared to the families with wild type BRCA1/2 (31.9% vs. 8.0% p = 0.001). Reconstruction of the chromosome phasing in three families and the analysis of three isolated cases with the IVS16-2A>G BRCA2 mutation identified the same haplotype associated with MBC, supporting the possibility that this founder mutation previously detected in Slovenian families is also present in the North East of our Country. Moreover, analysis of one family with the 9106C>T BRCA2 mutation allowed the identification of common haplotypes for both microsatellite and intragenic polymorphisms segregating with the mutation. Three isolated cases with the same mutation shared the same intragenic polymorphisms and three 5' microsatellite markers, but showed a different haplotype for 3' markers, which were common to all three cases.ConclusionThe 9106C>T and the IVS16-2A>G mutations constitute recurrent BRCA2 mutations in MBC cases from the North-East of Italy and may be associated with a founder effect. Knowledge of these two recurrent BRCA2 mutations predisposing to MBC may facilitate the analyses aimed at the identification of mutation carriers in our geographic area.

Large genomic BRCA2 rearrangements and male breast cancer

Background: Germ-line mutations of the BRCA2 gene are the highest known risk factors for male breast cancer (MBC). Mutations in BRCA2 are mainly point mutations in contrast to BRCA1 in which large genomic rearrangements are quite common. In recent literature, however, genomic alterations of BRCA2 have been linked especially to male breast cancer families. We wanted to screen large genomic deletions and duplications of BRCA2 among Finnish male breast cancer patients. Methods: We used multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) to detect large genomic rearrangements in the BRCA2 gene among 36 unselected Finnish male breast cancer patients previously tested and found negative for Finnish BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations. Results: No genomic mutations of BRCA2 nor CHEK2*1100delC point mutations, also included in the assay, were found in this study. Conclusion: Large genomic BRCA2 rearrangements were not found among our 36 Finnish male breast cancer patients. Screening of large BRCA2 rearrangements is not likely to be advantageous in Finland.

Significant Contribution of Germline BRCA2 Rearrangements in Male Breast Cancer Families

Although screening for large deletions or duplications of the BRCA1 gene is becoming a routine component of the molecular diagnosis of familial breast cancer, little is known about the occurrence of such rearrangements in the BRCA2 gene. Because of the high frequency of BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer families with at least one case of male breast cancer, we selected a cohort of 39 such families, tested negative for mutations in the coding regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2, and developed an assay for BRCA2 rearrangements, based on quantitative multiplex PCR of short fluorescent fragments (QMPSF). We found three rearrangements: (1) a deletion of exons 12 and 13; (2) a duplication of exons 1 and 2; and (3) a complete deletion of BRCA2. We determined the boundaries of the deletion of exons 12 and 13, showing that it resulted from an unequal recombination between Alu sequences. We mapped the complete BRCA2 deletion, which extends over at least 298 kb and showed that it does not affect APRIN/AS3, previously characterized as a tumor suppressor gene, but it comprises several loci corresponding to proven or putative transcripts of unknown functional significance. These data suggest that screening for BRCA2 rearrangements should be done, especially in male breast cancer families tested negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Molecular analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 32 breast and/or ovarian cancer Spanish families.

It is estimated that about 5–10% of breast cancer cases may be due to inherited predisposition. Until now, two main susceptibility genes have been identified: BRCA1 and BRCA2. The first linkage and mutational studies suggested that mutations in these two genes would account for the majority of high-risk breast cancer families, but recent studies show how the proportion of families due to BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations strongly depends on the population and the types of family analyzed. It is now clear that, in the context of families with a modest cancer profile, which are the most commonly found in the clinical practice, the percentage of mutations found is much lower than that suggested by the first studies. In the present study, we analyze a group of 32 Spanish families, which contatined at least three cases of female breast cancer (at least one of them diagnosed before the age of 50 years), for the presence of mutations in the BRCA genes. The total proportion of mutations was low (25%), although the percentage of mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes was higher, considering the breast and ovarian cancer families and the male breast cancer families respectively. Our results are in agreement with the idea that a great proportion of moderate-risk cancer families could be due to low penetrance susceptibility genes distinct from BRCA1 or BRCA2. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign

Molecular analysis of the BRCA2 gene in 16 breast/ovarian cancer Spanish families.

The recent isolated gene BRCA2 is responsible for about 45% of familial breast cancer and the majority of male breast cancer families. In order to evaluate the role of inherited BRCA2 mutations in Spanish families, the complete coding sequence of the gene was screened by SSCP/sequencing in 16 high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families. Four mutations were found that cause a premature termination codon. Two of them have been reported elsewhere and one is a novel mutation. In addition we have found seven polymorphisms, two of which have not been previously described. One of the mutations, 936delAAAC was found in two of our high-risk families. Because this mutation is considered as recurrent, we have tried to estimate its frequency in our breast cancer population. A total of 127 moderate- high-risk families were screened for this mutation and it was also found in another high-risk family. All the families carrying the 936delAAAC mutation harboured part of a common haplotype shared by other reported carriers, suggesting a possible founder effect for this mutation.

Mutation analysis of the BRCA2 gene in breast/ovarian cancer Spanish families: identification of two new mutations

The recently isolated gene BRCA2 is responsible for about 45% of familial breast cancer and the majority of male breast cancer families. We have screened 12 high risk breast/ovarian Spanish families for mutations in BRCA2, using SSCP followed by direct sequencing. We have found mutations in four of our 12 families (33.3%), including two with male breast cancer. Three of the mutations were frameshift and one was a missense. Two of the mutations have been previously published and two are new mutations.

A single BRCA2 mutation in male and female breast cancer families from Iceland with varied cancer phenotypes.

The BRCA2 gene on chromosome 13 has been shown to be associated with familial male and female breast cancer. Here we describe a study on BRCA2 in 21 Icelandic families, including 9 with male breast cancer. We have previously reported linkage to the BRCA2 region in an Icelandic male breast cancer family and subsequently found a strong indication of linkage to BRCA2 and the same BRCA2 haplotype in breast cancer cases from 15 additional families, indicating a common origin. We describe a five base-pair deletion in exon 9 of BRCA2 in an affected male from the male breast cancer family. The same mutation occurs in all the families with the shared BRCA2 haplotype indicating a founder effect. Among mutation carriers there are 12 males with breast cancer, which accounts for 40% of all males diagnosed with breast cancer in Iceland over the past 40 years. Three of them have no family history of breast cancer indicating that this mutation may have variable penetrance. The same BRCA2 mutation appears to be associated with different cancer phenotypes in this population including male and female breast cancer, prostate cancer, pancreas cancer and ovarian cancer.

Mutation analysis of the BRCA2 gene in 49 site–specific breast cancer families

The hereditary breast cancer gene BRCA2 was recently cloned and is believed to account for almost half of site-specific breast cancer families and the majority of male breast cancer families. We screened 49 site-specific breast cancer families for mutations in the BRCA2 gene using single strand conformation analysis (SSCA) followed by direct sequencing. We found mutations in eight families, including all four families with male breast cancer. The eight mutations were small deletions with the exception of a single nonsense mutation, an all were predicted to interrupt the BRCA2 coding sequence and to lead to a truncated protein product. Other factors which predicted the presence of a BRCA2 mutation included a case of breast cancer diagnosed at age 35 or below (P = 0.01) and a family history of pancreatic cancer (P = 0.03). Two mutations were seen twice, including a 8535delAG, which was detected in two French Canadian families. Our results suggest the possibility that the proportion of site-specific breast cancer families attributable to BRCA2 may be overestimated.