Major Response Rate Research Articles

Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus CapeOX in patients with localized dMMR/MSI-H gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (GC/EGJC): Results from the cohort C of phase II NICE trial.

349 Background: Surgery is the cornerstone of curative therapy for localized GC or EGJC and perioperative chemotherapy seems ineffective for those with dMMR/MSI-H tumors. Chemotherapy may booster antitumor immunity. There is a compelling need to investigate the efficacy of perioperative immunochemotherapy for those with dMMR/MSI-H tumors. Methods: NICE trial is a multicenter, multi-cohort phase II trial (NCT04744649) investigating the safety and efficacy of toripalimab combined with CapeOX regimen as perioperative treatment for localized GC or EGJC of PD-L1 CPS≥5 (IHC 22C3) (cohort A), EBV-positive (cohort B), and dMMR/MSI-H (cohort C). Among those cohorts, the cohort A was compared with the control group of perioperative CapeOX regimen in a randomized controlled trial manner, while the cohort B and C were single arm. In present study, we report the findings of Cohort C, and the patients (pts) received toripalimab 240 mg combined with standard dose CapeOX regimen q3 weeks for 4 cycles before and after surgery. The eligible tumor stages were cT3-4aNxM0 or cT2N+M0 diagnosed by chest and abdominal CT combined with staging laparoscopy as well as negative peritoneal cytology. The primary endpoint was major pathologic response (MPR, <10% viable cells) rate. Multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry (mIHC) was utilized to explore changes of immune microenvironment. Results: Between March 2021 and April 2023, 15 pts with dMMR/MSI-H localized GC/GEJC were recruited in Cohort C. Tumor stages were cT3N0(n=2), cT3N1-3 (n=2), cT4aN0 (n=1) and cT4aN1-3 (n=10). 14 pts completed all 4 cycles therapy preoperatively and one patient completed 2 cycles therapy because of AEs. None had disease progression, while one achieved a complete clinical response at radiology and endoscopy and refused surgery and the other 14 pts underwent resection. The R0 resection rate was 100% (14/14). The MPR rate was 92.9% (13/14) and the residual tumor percentage was 33.8% in the other one patient (cT4aN2). pCR rate was 78.6% (11/14). Therapy-related grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 5 pts of safety population (n=15). One patient occurred grade 3 immune-related liver toxicity after 2 cycles treatment and recovered after steroids therapy. No pts died during the perioperative treatment, and one patient died of COVID-19 238 days after surgery without relapse. No disease relapse was observed in all pts. The mIHC revealed a significant reduction in CD20+ B cells, CD3+ T cells, NK dim cells, and M1 macrophages within tumor area after treatment for patients who reached pCR. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant toripalimab and CapeOX regimen for the localized dMMR/MSI-H GC/GEJC is safety with high MPR rate. These data indicate that neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy may potentially become one of the treatment options for these patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04744649 .

Chemotherapy plus camrelizumab versus chemotherapy alone as neoadjuvant treatment for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCORT-NEO): A multi-center, randomized phase III trial.

LBA244 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is the standard of care for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). However, recurrence post-surgery remains a concern. Recent single-arm studies with neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy showed promising results. This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study aims to evaluate the role of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant camrelizumab, versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for resectable LA-ESCC. Methods: Patients with resectable thoracic LA-ESCC (T1b-3N1-3M0 or T3N0M0) were stratified according to clinical stage (I/II, III, or IVa) and randomized (1:1:1) to three groups for two 3-week cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. Group A received camrelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin; group B used camrelizumab, paclitaxel and cisplatin; group C received paclitaxel and cisplatin. Surgery was planned 4-6 weeks post-neoadjuvant therapy. Postoperative adjuvant camrelizumab every 3 weeks was given to groups A and B for up to 15 cycles. The co-primary endpoints were pathological complete response (pCR) rate, assessed by an independent blinded pathological committee, and event-free survival, evaluated by investigators per RECIST 1.1. The overall type I error was controlled at a one-sided 0.025 across the primary endpoints using a graphical method. Results: Between April, 2021, and August, 2023, we enrolled 391 patients: group A (n = 132), group B (n = 130), and group C (n = 129). 106 (27.1%), 279 (71.4%), 6 (1.5%) patients were in clinical stage I/II, III, and IVa. Tumors were located in the upper, middle, and lower thoracic esophagus for 41 (10.5%), 201 (51.4%), and 149 (38.1%) patients. 128 (97.0%), 125 (96.2%), and 122 (94.6%) patients from groups A, B, and C completed two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, and 114 (86.4%), 116 (89.2%), and 103 (79.8%) underwent surgery. In the intention-to-treat population, the pCR rate was significantly higher in groups A (28.0%) and B (15.4%) compared to group C (4.7%) (group A vs. C: difference, 23.5%, 95%CI, 15.1-32.0; OR, 8.11, 95%CI, 3.28-20.06; two-sided P < 0.0001; group B vs. C: difference, 10.9%, 95%CI, 3.7-18.1; OR, 3.81, 95%CI, 1.48-9.80; two-sided P = 0.0034); major pathologic response rates were 59.1%, 36.2%, 20.9% for groups A, B and C. In the surgical set, the R0 resection rate was 99.1%, 95.7% and 92.2% for groups A, B and C, and the incidence of postoperative complications was 34.2%, 38.8% and 32.0%. During neoadjuvant treatment, the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events was 34.1%, 28.5% and 28.8%. Conclusions: In resectable LA-ESCC patients, neoadjuvant camrelizumab with chemotherapy showed superior pCR and a tolerable safety profile compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000040034 .

Sequential treatment escalation improves survival in patients with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia.

Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) is a type of incurable, indolent B-cell lymphoma that is prone to relapse. Over time, treatment strategies have progressed from cytotoxic drugs to rituximab (R)- or bortezomib (V)-based regimens, and have now entered into an era of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)-based regimens. However, the optimal treatment for the relapsed patients is still unclear. Herein, we analyzed the outcomes of the first- and second-line therapies in 377 patients with WM to illustrate the optimal choices for second-line therapy. After a median follow-up of 45.4 months, 89 patients received second-line therapy, and 53 patients were evaluated for response. The major response rates (MRR) of first- and second-line treatment were 65.1% and 67.9% (P = 0.678). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the second-line therapy (PFS2) was shorter than that for the first-line therapy (PFS1) (56.3 vs 40.7 months, P = 0.03). However, PFS2 in targeted drugs group (R-/V-/BTKi-based regimens) was comparable to PFS1 (60.7 months vs 44.7 months, respectively, P = 0.21). Regarding second-line therapy, patients who underwent sequential treatment escalation-such as transitioning from cytotoxic drugs to R-/V-/BTKi-based regimens or from R-/V-based to BTKi-based regimens (escalation group) -had higher MRR (80.6% vs 47.1%, respectively, P = 0.023) and longer PFS2 (50.4 vs 23.5 months, respectively, P < 0.001) compared to the non-escalation group. Patients in the escalation group also had longer post-relapse overall survival compared with the non-escalation group (median, 50.4 vs 23.5 months, respectively, P = 0.039). Our findings indicate that sequential treatment escalation may improve the survival of patients with WM.

Perioperative Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy for Patients With Resectable Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy have improved clinical outcomes for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal combination of checkpoint inhibition with chemotherapy remains unknown. To determine whether toripalimab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy will improve event-free survival and major pathological response in patients with stage II or III resectable NSCLC compared with chemotherapy alone. This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with stage II or III resectable NSCLC (without EGFR or ALK alterations for nonsquamous NSCLC) from March 12, 2020, to June 19, 2023, at 50 participating hospitals in China. The data cutoff date for this interim analysis was November 30, 2022. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 240 mg of toripalimab or placebo once every 3 weeks combined with platinum-based chemotherapy for 3 cycles before surgery and 1 cycle after surgery, followed by toripalimab only (240 mg) or placebo once every 3 weeks for up to 13 cycles. The primary outcomes were event-free survival (assessed by the investigators) and the major pathological response rate (assessed by blinded, independent pathological review). The secondary outcomes included the pathological complete response rate (assessed by blinded, independent pathological review) and adverse events. Of the 501 patients randomized, 404 had stage III NSCLC (202 in the toripalimab + chemotherapy group and 202 in the placebo + chemotherapy group) and 97 had stage II NSCLC and were excluded from this interim analysis. The median age was 62 years (IQR, 56-65 years), 92% of patients were male, and the median follow-up was 18.3 months (IQR, 12.7-22.5 months). For the primary outcome of event-free survival, the median length was not estimable (95% CI, 24.4 months-not estimable) in the toripalimab group compared with 15.1 months (95% CI, 10.6-21.9 months) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.28-0.57], P < .001). The major pathological response rate (another primary outcome) was 48.5% (95% CI, 41.4%-55.6%) in the toripalimab group compared with 8.4% (95% CI, 5.0%-13.1%) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 40.2% [95% CI, 32.2%-48.1%], P < .001). The pathological complete response rate (secondary outcome) was 24.8% (95% CI, 19.0%-31.3%) in the toripalimab group compared with 1.0% (95% CI, 0.1%-3.5%) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 23.7% [95% CI, 17.6%-29.8%]). The incidence of immune-related adverse events occurred more frequently in the toripalimab group. No unexpected treatment-related toxic effects were identified. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events, fatal adverse events, and adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment were comparable between the groups. The addition of toripalimab to perioperative chemotherapy led to a significant improvement in event-free survival for patients with resectable stage III NSCLC and this treatment strategy had a manageable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04158440.

Clinical study of camrelizumab combined with docetaxel and carboplatin as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Herein, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with docetaxel and carboplatin as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Fifty-one patients with OSCC, treated from July 2020 to October 2022, were analyzed. Of them, 41 patients underwent surgery 4-8weeks after undergoing twocycles of camrelizumab (200mg IV Q3W) combined with docetaxel (75mg/m2 IV Q3W) and carboplatin (area under the curve = 5-6 IV Q3W). The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response rate. All 51 patients (100%) experienced treatment-related grades 1-2 adverse events, and 2 patients (3.9%) experienced grade 4 events (including elevated alanine transaminase/aspartate transferase levels and Guillain-Barre syndrome). Fifty patients were evaluated for the treatment efficacy. Of them, 13 achieved complete response, and the objective response rate was 74%. Only 41 patients underwent surgical treatment. The pathological complete response rate was 17.1%, the major pathological response rate was 63.4%, and the R0 resection rate was 100%. Approximately 22% of the patients had tumor regression grades 0. Eight patients (19.5%) developed surgery-related complications. The median follow-up time was 18months (range: 3-29months). Four patients experienced disease progression, while four died. The median disease-free survival and overall survival were not reached. Camrelizumab combined with docetaxel and carboplatin is an effective and safe neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced OSCC. This regimen may afford a potential strategy to treat patients with locally advanced OSCC.

Short-term outcomes of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis (JCOG1704)

BackgroundThe prognosis for marginally resectable gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis (ELM) remains unfavorable, even after R0 resection. To assess the safety and efficacy of preoperative docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS), we conducted a multicenter phase II trial.MethodsEligibility criteria included histologically proven HER2-negative gastric adenocarcinoma with bulky nodal (bulky N) involvement around major branched arteries or para-aortic node (PAN) metastases. Patients received three cycles of docetaxel (40 mg/m2, day 1), oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2, day 1), and S-1 (80–120 mg/body, days 1–14), followed by gastrectomy with D2 plus PAN dissection. Subsequently, patients underwent postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 for 1 year. The primary endpoint was major (grade ≥ 2a) pathological response rate (pRR) according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma criteria.ResultsBetween October 2018 and March 2022, 47 patients (bulky N, 20; PAN, 17; both, 10) were enrolled in the trial. One patient was ineligible. Another declined any protocol treatments before initiation. Among the 45 eligible patients who initiated DOS chemotherapy, 44 (98%) completed 3 cycles and 42 (93%) underwent R0 resection. Major pRR and pathological complete response rates among the 46 eligible patients, including the patient who declined treatment, were 57% (26/46) and 24% (11/46), respectively. Common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (24%), anorexia (16%), febrile neutropenia (9%), and diarrhea (9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.ConclusionsPreoperative chemotherapy with DOS yielded favorable pathological responses with an acceptable toxicity profile. This multimodal approach is highly promising for treating gastric cancer with ELM.

Analysis of surgical complexity and short-term prognostic indicators in NSCLC patients: neoadjuvant targeted therapy versus neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant therapy improves survival benefits in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer but increases tissue density, presenting challenges for surgeons. To compare the differences in surgical complexity and short-term prognostic outcomes between neoadjuvant targeted therapy (NTT) and neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCI). This study enrolled 106 patients underwent curative surgery after neoadjuvant therapy between January 2020 and December 2023 at the National Cancer Center of China. Differences in surgical complexity and short-term prognostic outcomes between the two neoadjuvant therapy cohorts were evaluated. The pathological indicators such as pathological response rate and lymph node upstaging/downstaging were then analyzed. In total, 33 patients underwent NTT and 73 underwent NCI preoperatively. Patients who received NTT showed a higher minimally invasive surgery rate (84.8% versus 53.4%, p < 0.01), shorter operative time (144 versus 184 min, p < 0.01), lower conversion rate (3.3% versus 17.8%, p = 0.03), less postoperative drainage (day 3: 140 versus 200 mL, p = 0.03), and lower incidence of postoperative complications including arrhythmias (6.1% versus 26%, p = 0.02). The pathological response rate in the NTT and NCI groups was 70% and 75%, respectively, with the latter group showing a higher complete pathological response rate. The two groups had no significant differences in major pathological response and lymph node pathological response rate. Patients who received NTT presented fewer surgical challenges for surgeons and had better surgical outcomes than those who received NCI therapy, with comparable pathological response rates between the two cohorts. Accordingly, NTT is the preferred induction regimen for patients harboring mutation status.

CFL1 is Implicated in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Response during Imatinib Therapy.

Cofilin (CFL1) is one critical member of the actin deploy family (ADF). Overexpression of CFL1 is associated with aggressive features and poor prognosis in malignancies. We evaluated the expression of CFL1 in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP), acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) and healthy controls. The role of CFL1 in imatinib therapy was also investigated using cell line. We found that the expression of CFL1 was lower in CML patients than that in healthy controls, and was significantly upregulated after imatinib therapy (p<0.05). CML patients with lower CFL1 achieved higher Major molecular response (MMR) rate after 6 months of imatinib therapy (p<0.05). Cofilin, P-cofilin and F-actin, especially branched F-actin were all upregulated after imatinib therapy. The lower CFL1 expression before treatment may predicts a better response to imatinib. Imatinib affects F-actin remodeling in CML patients by regulating CFL1 expression and activity.

Risk factor analysis and nomogram construction of postoperative complications for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

The combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy (NICT) has become a common treatment regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). However, the safety and efficacy of radical gastrectomy following NICT (NICT-G) remain controversial. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors influencing postoperative complications (POCs) after NICT-G. Additionally, it aimed to construct a nomogram to provide a clinical reference for predicting POCs. This study included 177 patients who received NICT-G at the Chinese PLA General Hospital First Medical Center from January 2020 to January 2024. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the risk factors influencing POCs, and a nomogram model was constructed. To evaluate the discrimination and accuracy of the nomogram model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the calibration curve were measured. In 177 patients who received NICT-G, the pathological complete response and major pathological response rates were 15.8% and 45.2%, respectively, whereas the rates of the overall and severe treatment-related adverse events were 71.8% and 15.8%, respectively. In addition, 43 (24.3%) patients developed overall POCs (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ II). Univariable and multivariable logistic analyses showed that age ≥70 years, greater estimated blood loss, platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≤196, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >1.33, non-R0 resection, and body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2 were independent risk factors for overall POCs (p < 0.05). The nomogram model developed using the abovementioned variables showed that the AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.808 (95% CI): 0.731-0.885 in predicting the POC risk. The calibration curves showed that the prediction curve of the nomogram was a good fit for the actual POCs (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: χ2 = 5.76, P = 0.451). The independent risk factors for overall POCs in the NICT-G were age ≥ 70 years, greater estimated blood loss, PLR ≤ 196, NLR > 1.33, non-R0 resection, and BMI < 18.5 kg/m2. The nomogram model developed based on the abovementioned indicators showed better accuracy in predicting the POC risk.

Neoadjuvant PD-1 Plus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Clinical studies have shown that programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors can activate T cells and inhibit cancer growth. Therefore, the use of a PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is worth further exploration. Patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled in this study to receive two cycles of a preoperative combination of toripalimab, paclitaxel, and cisplatin. Efficacy was evaluated after two treatment cycles. The patients' postoperative pathological staging was analyzed and compared. Surgery was performed within 42 days of the start date of the last chemotherapy cycle. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy achieved a high pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (29.0%), major pathological response rate (41.9%), and objective response rate (80.6%) and demonstrated statistically significant downstaging after neoadjuvant therapy (P < .05) with manageable treatment-related adverse effects. No significant association was found between PD-L1 level and pCR (P = .365). In addition, R0 resection was achieved in all 31 (100%) patients during surgery. For all the included patients, the one-year progression-free survival rate was 87.1% (95% CI: 75.3%-98.9%), the one-year overall survival (OS) rate was 96.8% (95% CI: 79.8%-95.9%), and the two-year OS rate was 83.9% (95% CI: 71.6%-92.2%). Our findings indicate that this combination may be a potential neoadjuvant therapy regimen in this setting.

Perioperative tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for locally advanced resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma trial: a prospective single-arm, phase II study (PILOT trial)

BackgroundThe promising therapeutic outcomes of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have been confirmed by several phase II clinical trials and have been widely demonstrated in clinical work. Theoretically, postoperative adjuvant immunotherapy may further improve the therapeutic effect, but there is still lack of evidence. The aim of this study was to analyse the safety and efficacy of perioperative immunotherapy (tislelizumab) in locally advanced resectable thoracic ESCC (PILOT trial).MethodsSeventy-three eligible patients with pathologically confirmed thoracic ESCC of clinical T1b-3N1-3M0 or T3N0M0 stage were allocated to receive neoadjuvant immunotherapy (tislelizumab 200 mg d1, q3w × 2 cycles) plus chemotherapy (nad-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2 d1 + carboplatin AUC = 5 d1, q3w × 2 cycles) treatment. Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) after esophagectomy received adjuvant tislelizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks for up to one year), and patients with non-pCR were assigned adjuvant tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for two cycles and then maintenance tislelizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 15 cycles). The primary endpoint of this study is 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) in non-pCR patients. The secondary endpoints include pCR rate, major pathological response rate, 2-year DFS in pCR patients, R0 resection rate, adverse events, and overall survival.DiscussionThis protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Chest Hospital (IS23059). This is the first prospective clinical trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of perioperative immunotherapy for locally advanced resectable thoracic ESCC. We hypothesize that perioperative immunotherapy could be a promising therapeutic strategy that can provide better 2-year DFS in non-pCR patients.Trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov: NCT0605633.

Second annual report from the ISSPP PIPAC database.

To monitor the results of PIPAC directed therapy based on data from the International Society for the Study of the Pleura and Peritoneum (ISSPP) PIPAC database. Analysis of data from patients entered between June 15th, 2020, and February 28th, 2023. Twelve centers reported 2,456 PIPAC procedures in 809 patients (median 2, range 1-18) with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from different primary tumors. Approximately 90 % had systemic chemotherapy prior to PIPAC. Twenty-eight percent were treated in prospective protocols. Overall non-access rate was 3.5 %. Concomitant surgical procedures were performed during PIPAC in 1.6 % of the patients. Median length of stay was 2days. A total of 95 surgical complications were recorded, but only 22 % of these were graded≥3b. Seventeen-hundred-and-three adverse events were noted, and 8 % were classified≥3. The rate of complete or major histological response (peritoneal regression grade score, PRGS≤2) increased between the first and the third PIPAC in the group of patients who were evaluated by PRGS, and a PRGS≤2 or a reduction of the mean PRGS of at least 1 between first and third PIPAC were observed in 80 %. Disease progression (50 %) or technical issues (19 %) were the most important reasons for stopping PIPAC treatment. Median overall survival from first PIPAC directed treatment varied from 10.7months (CI 8.7-12.5) in gastric cancer to 27.1months (16.4-50.5) in mesothelioma. The ISSPP PIPAC database provides substantial real-world data supporting the use of PIPAC directed therapy in patients with PM from different primary tumors.

Camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma cancer: Results from a retrospective study.

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy during preoperative neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) of clinical Stages II and III. The patients received camrelizumab plus chemotherapy regimen on Day 1 for up to three to four cycles (3 weeks per cycle). The probabilities of overall survival (OS) were 55.6% at 12 months and 35.6% at 18 months (45 patients). The disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 70.0% at 12 months and 63.3% at 18 months (30 patients). The median OS and DFS were not reached. The proportion of patients at postneoadjuvant pathological tumor stages ypT0, ypT2, and ypT3 were 10 (33.3%), 14 (46.7%), and 6 (20.0%), respectively, and those at stages ypN0 and ypN1 were 19 (63.3%) and 11 (36.7%), respectively. Additionally, the pathological complete response rate was 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.154-0.512), and the major pathologic response rate was 46.7% (95% CI: 0.277-0.656). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in five patients (11.1%), with vomiting being the most common AE (three patients; 3.3%). Other common AEs of any grade included decreased lymphocyte count (48.9%), reactive capillary endothelial proliferation (46.7%), decreased white blood cell count (40.0%), anemia (31.1%), and vomiting (31.1%). The combination of camrelizumab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced resectable ESCC demonstrated promising efficacy and acceptable safety.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Gastrectomy for Cytology-Positive Gastric Cancer without Any Other Non-Curative Factors in a Western Setting: An International Eastern European Cohort Study.

The optimal approach for treating cytology-positive (Cy1) gastric cancer (GC) patients without additional non-curative factors remains uncertain. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy shows promise, its suitability for Western patients is not well supported by existing data. To address this knowledge gap, a cohort study was conducted across four major GC treatment centers in Lithuania, Estonia, and Ukraine. Forty-three consecutive Cy1 GC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2016 and 2020 were enrolled. The study evaluated overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cytology status conversion, and major pathological response rates, along with the factors influencing these outcomes. All patients underwent surgery post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with 53.5% experiencing cytological status conversion and 23.3% achieving a major pathological response. The median OS and PFS were 20 (95% CI: 16-25) and 19 (95% CI: 11-20) months, respectively. Conversion to negative cytology significantly reduced the relative risk of peritoneal progression (RR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.03-0.47, p = 0.002). The study suggests that neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy holds promise as a treatment option for Cy1 GC without additional non-curative factors, associating cytology status conversion with improved long-term outcomes and reduced peritoneal relapse risk.

Frontline therapy with bendamustine rituximab (BR) and rituximab cyclophosphamide vincristine prednisone (RCVP) confers similar long-term outcomes in patients with treatment naïve Waldenström macroglobulinemia in a real-world setting: a population-based analysis

We report on outcomes of 111 patients with treatment naïve Waldenström macroglobulinemia (TN WM) treated with frontline bendamustine–rituximab (BR) (n = 57) or rituximab–cyclophosphamide–vincristine–prednisone (RCVP) (n = 54). Median follow-up was 60.7 months (range 1.9–231.6). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 60.5 months (95% CI 47.6–73.4) for BR and 79.0 months (95% CI 31.3–126.8) for RCVP (p = .96). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached for BR and 153.4 months (95% CI 114.5–192.4) for RCVP (p = .37). While overall and major response rates did not differ between treatment groups, BR had numerically higher rate of very good partial response or better response (51% vs. 37%, p = .30) and complete response (26% vs. 13%, p = .13). RCVP confers comparable outcomes to BR in a real-world population of TN WM patients and remains an effective regimen, particularly when tolerance or frailty is an issue, or in resource-limited settings.

Neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical trial (CY-NICE).

Adding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to the chemotherapy has shown significant clinical benefits in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Sintilimab is one such ICI used for treatment. Herein, we designed a trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sintilimab combined with paclitaxel and platinum for locally advanced resectable ESCC. Patients with locally advanced resectable (stage II-III) ESCC were enrolled and received at least two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy with sintilimab (200 mg on day 1) plus platinum-based chemotherapy in each 3-week cycle followed by esophagectomy. The primary endpoint of the trial was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. The secondary endpoints were the major pathological response (MPR) rate, the objective response rate (ORR), the treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), the immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and quality of life (QOL). Besides, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) were exploratory endpoints. Forty-three cases were needed to be enrolled in this trial. It was assumed the regimen of the neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy would achieve a pCR rate of 30.5%. Between March 2021 and January 2023, a total of 43 patients (41 men and 2 women) were enrolled, including 11 cases (25.6%) of clinical stage II and 32 cases (74.4%) of clinical stage III at baseline. All the 43 patients completed two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, and 32 patients received McKeown radical resection for esophageal cancer. The pCR rate was 28.1% (9/32), which was below the 30.5% reference cutoff value, and the MPR rate was 37.5% (12/32). According to RECIST 1.1, four patients (4/43, 9.3%) had a complete response (CR), 21 patients (21/43, 48.8%) had a partial response (PR), ORR was 58.1% (25/43). The incidence of ≥ grade 3 TRAEs was 23.3% (10/43) and there were no ≥ grade 4 TRAEs. Sintilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy is safe, feasible and effective in locally advanced resectable ESCC, suggesting a supportive rationale for its further evaluation in randomized clinical trials. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR2200056558.

A Phase 4, Observational Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (BTKi) Zanubrutinib in Patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM)

Background and Significance:Zanubrutinib, a next-generation, selective BTKi, is approved for treatment of WM based on data from the phase 3 ASPEN study (NCT03053440), in which zanubrutinib showed a favorable benefit-risk profile vs ibrutinib, a first-generation BTKi, in patients with symptomatic WM (Tam CS, et al. Blood. 2020;136:2038-2050). In ASPEN, zanubrutinib showed consistent efficacy across patient subgroups, including prior treatment status (treatment naive or relapsed/refractory) and MYD88 mutational status (shown to affect prognosis and response to treatment). This registry study will contribute to a more inclusive evidence base for zanubrutinib treatment in populations underrepresented in previous clinical studies, specifically patients who are treatment naive, have non-L265 MYD88 mutations, orare from racial and ethnic minority groups. Study Design and Methods:This is a hybrid (retrospective and prospective), multicenter (US only), noninterventional registry study (NCT05640102) in adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of WM who are either receiving or planning to initiate zanubrutinib treatment (Figure). Patients with measurable disease (immunoglobulin M level &amp;gt;0.5 g/dL) at zanubrutinib initiation are eligible. Patients with disease transformation prior to zanubrutinib initiation, other non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes, or other malignancies (active or in the past ≤1 year) are excluded. Patients will be assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts based on MYD88 status determined using bone marrow specimens. Cohort 1 will include patients with MYD88L265P mutations who are treatment naive (arm A) or have relapsed/refractory disease (arm B). Arm A will enroll mostly patients from racial and ethnic minority groups (Black/African American, Asian, Indigenous/Native American, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and Hispanic/Latino), and arm B will only enroll patients from racial and ethnic minority groups. Cohort 2 will include patients with non-L265P MYD88 mutations or MYD88 wild type who are treatment naive or have relapsed/refractory disease in a single arm (arm C). The dose and duration of zanubrutinib treatment is at the discretion of the prescribing physician. Data collection will occur at screening, every 3 cycles during year 1 of zanubrutinib treatment, and every 6 cycles thereafter (28-day cycles). The primary endpoint is the major response rate (MRR) per investigator using Sixth International Workshop on Waldenström Macroglobulinemia response criteria (Owen RG, et al. Br J Haematol. 2013;160:171-176). Secondary endpoints are very good partial response or better (VGPR+) rate, overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and treatment-emergent adverse events. Efficacy and safety analyses will be conducted descriptively for each study arm. MRR, VGPR+ rate, and ORR will be presented with 95% CIs, and median DOR will be estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. The study is currently open for enrollment.

Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Approach and Long-Term Outcomes of 678 Patients with Symptomatic Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia: Comprehensive Insights from a Spanish Registry of IgM Gammapathies

Introduction The pathogenesis of Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) involves the clonal expansion of lymphoplasmacytic B cells in bone marrow, producing monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM). The heterogeneity of clinical manifestations in this uncommon disease represents the treatment approach more challenging. Multicenter registries may help in improving health care and scientific research. PRAME is a Spanish national registry of WM and IgM-related disorders with comprehensive data collection, providing insights for a better understanding of WM. Methods This is a retrospective, multicenter study that included newly diagnosed symptomatic WM (SWM) patients, evaluated at (24) Spanish hospitals between 1990 and 2023. All patients had confirmed diagnoses of SWM according to the International Workshop Consensus. Data collection on patients' demographics and disease epidemiology, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment approaches and outcomes were performed from patients' local medical files. Results From 1796 total patients included in the Spanish registry for IgM gammopathies, a total of 678 newly SWM patients were identified. The median age was 71(range 35-94) years, 37% of patients had aged ≥ 75 years and 63% were male. The most common symptom at diagnosis was anemia (43%), followed by B symptoms (30%). Fifteen percent had peripheral neuropathy (PN) as the first WM symptom (39% with sensitive motor PN). Hyperviscosity was only observed in 15%. The free light chain isotypes were mostly kappa (75.4%). Less than 5% of the total cohort, had an ECOG ≥3, at diagnosis. Among 403 patients, who had samples available for assessing MYD88L265P by quantitative allele-specific PCR, 75% were positive for the mutation. However, out of the 199 patients assessed for CXCR4(S388X) mutation, only 12% were positive. The first line of therapy was started in 98% of patients. Plasmapheresis was indicated in 10%, with a median number of 2 sessions. The most frequent indications for initiating the treatment were anemia (48%), B symptoms (13%), and neuropathy (9%). Symptoms related to IgM monoclonal and extramedullary involvement were seen in 15% (56% associated with hyperviscosity) and 11.3%, respectively. The main first-line treatment regimens received were: chlorambucil (37%), dexamethasone, rituximab and cyclophosphamide (DRC)(21%), rituximab monotherapy (13%), bendamustine/rituximab (BR) (9.1%), Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors (7%), and bortezomib, dexamethasone and rituximab (BDR) (5.5%). The overall and major response rates (ORR and MRR) were 67% and 58%, respectively. (Table 1). The MRR was higher among patients who received BR as the first line of therapy (88%), with a 26% of complete response (CR) and 21% of very good partial responses (VGPR). The CR+VGPR rates with other common regimens were 17% for DRC, 9% for BDR and 21% for BTK inhibitors, respectively. With a median follow-up of 96 months (IQR, 43 to 192), the median overall survival (OS) was 8.7 years (95% confidence interval [CI]:7.3-10.1) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.8 years (95% CI:6.2-7.5) with no relevant improvement over the last years. (Figure 1) Conclusion In the current registry, we observed a high proportion of younger patients with good performance status at diagnosis. Among newly diagnosed SWM patients, BR demonstrated ongoing superiority as a front line of therapy, leading to deeper responses compared to other therapeutic schemes. There were no significant differences in OS between different times of diagnosis. This Spanish registry for SWM contributes to advancing knowledge and the continual enhancement of treatment strategies for WM.

Phase 2 Study of Dasatinib with and without Venetoclax in Patients with Early Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (ECP-CML)

Background Treatment-free remission (TFR) is a therapeutic goal for patients with ECP-CML once patients maintain a deep molecular remission (DMR) on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Only a fraction of patients (pts) achieved sustained (3+ years) molecular remission with 4.0- to 4.5-log reduction (MR4.5). Preclinical studies showed that BCL-2 is a key survival factor for CML stem/progenitor cells. Therefore, the combination of TKIs and venetoclax, targeting BCR::ABL1 and BCL-2, has the potential to significantly improve DMR and subsequently the rates of TFR. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination. Methods Patients with ECP-CML or accelerated phase (AP; defined by clonal evolution only) were eligible; pts with &amp;lt; 1 month of prior TKI therapy were eligible. Pts received single-agent dasatinib 50 mg/d for the first 3 months. From Month 4 and onwards, venetoclax was administered from Days 1 to 14 each month concomitantly with dasatinib for a total of 3 years. The first 16 patients received venetoclax 200 mg/d, with a rapid ramp-up starting 50 mg on Day 1, then 100 mg on Day 2, then 200 mg daily on Day 3 and onwards. Due to neutropenia observed with continuous dose of venetoclax 200 mg/d, the protocol was ameded: from patient #17 and onwards, venetoclax was administered at 200 mg/d for 14 days per month and upon achievement of MR4.5, venetoclax was reduced to 100 mg/d for 7 days per month. After 3 years of combination, patients received single-agent dasatinib. TFR was offered after ≥ 3 years of DMR. The primary endpoint was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months of the combination. The secondary endpoints were the 12-month rate of MR4.5 and the cumulative overall rate of MR4.5; the rates of MR4.5 at 6-, 12-, 18-, 24, and 36-months of the combination; the proportion of patients with sustained MR4.5 of 3 years and more; the TFR rate; overall survival; and the safety of the combination. Cumulative response rates were calculated with treatment failure as a competing event. Failure-free survival (FFS) was calculated from the initiation of therapy to loss of major cytogenetic response (MCyR), transformation to AP or blast phase, discontinuation of therapy for any reason except of TFR, or death. Results Sixty-five pts were enrolled and treated between April 2018 and August 2021. The median age at treatment initation was 46 years (range, 23-73) and 57% of the pts were females. Twenty-one (32%) pts had splenomegaly, 46 (71%) had low Sokal risk disease and 3 (5%) had high Sokal risk disease (Table 1). By 12 months of the combination, 85% of the pts had achieved MMR or deeper response. The median time to MMR, MR4, and MR4.5 were 6.2 months, 13 months, and 23.9 months from the time of TKI start, respectively. After a median follow-up of 25.7 months (range, 8.7-48.1), two pts discontinued therapy due to adverse events (GI intolerance, and pleural effusion); the 2 -year FFS was 96%. One pt switched TKI therapy due to the lack of 18-month complete cytogenetic response (CCyR); no loss of CCyR, transformation, or death was observed. We then compared the outcomes with the combination to the outcomes of 85 pts treated with single-agent dasatinib. From the start of TKI therapy, the 12-month cumulative MMR rates were 78% and 79% in the dasatinib single-agent and dasatinib + venetoclax groups, respectively. The cumulative 24-month rates of CCyR, MMR, MR4, and MR4.5 are summarized in Table 2. In the dasatinib single-agent group, 3 pts switched TKI therapy due to the lack of 12-month MCyR, 18-month CCyR, and the acquisition of ABL1 mutation (1 each); 3 pts switched TKI therapy due to loss of CCyR; 2 pts died during therapy (deaths unrelated to CML). Within one year of therapy, the incidence of grade 1/2 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, below lower range of normal to 1,000 x10 9/L) was 21% and 52% in the dasatinib single agent and dasatinib + venetoclax groups, respectively ( P&amp;lt;0.001); the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, below 1,000 x10 9/L) was 8% and 17%, respectively ( P&amp;lt;0.001). There was no incidence of neutropenic fever in the dasatinib + venetoclax. Conclusion The combination of dasatinib 50 mg/d and venetoclax is safe and effective in pts with ECP-CML. With a median follow-up of 2 years, the cumulative resposne of dasatinib + venetoclax is similar to that of dasatinib single-agent without adding significant toxicities. Further follow-up is needed for the evaluation of TFR.

Lower-Initiating Dose of Bosutinib for Resistant or Intolerant to Prior Therapy Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients (BOGI trial): A Single-Arm, Multicenter, Phase II Trial

Introduction: The introduction of ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has markedly improved the survival outcomes in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP). Second-generation TKIs are highly active for patients with newly diagnosed and resistant/intolerant CML-CP. Although bosutinib is generally safe, drug-related toxicities (DRTs) such as diarrhea or increased transaminase leading to treatment discontinuation, are often observed. The standard initial daily dosage of bosutinib is 400 mg for newly diagnosed or 500 mg for resistant/intolerant patients with CML-CP, whereas some experts suggest lower dose (200-300 mg) initiation is recommended to reduce adverse events (AEs). However, the safety and efficacy of lower dose initiation of bosutinib are unknown. Hence, we conducted a phase 2 study of BOsutinib Gradual Increase as a second/third-line treatment for CML-CP (BOGI trial, UMIN 000032282) to clarify whether a lower initiating dose of bosutinib (200 mg daily) would reduce discontinuation or interruption of treatment due to DRTs. Patients and methods We included CML patients who developed at least one line of treatment failure (resistant or intolerant), aged &amp;gt;18 years with an ECOG performance status of 0-2 and adequate organ function. After enrollment, the patients initiated 200 mg of bosutinib daily; subsequently, dose escalation was performed by 100 mg daily (up to 500 mg daily) every 2 weeks if no grade 3 or higher AEs occurred. BCR::ABL1 mRNA levels were measured by the standardized international scale at a central laboratory at 3, 6, 9, and 12 month since treatment initiation. The primary endpoint was the treatment discontinuation rate due to DRTs at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included the treatment interruption rate, mean bosutinib dosage, dosing days and relative dose intensity until 12 months, achievement of cytogenetic response (CCyR), cumulative rates of major molecular response (MMR) or deep molecular response (DMR). Sample size calculation was performed by research and biostatistics SWOG statistical tools (at null proportion = 0.32, alternative proportion = 0.14, one-sided α error = 5% and β error = 20%, power 80%) with the discontinuation rate of the previous Japanese phase 1/2 study of bosutinib as a reference (Nakaseko C, et al. Int J Hematol. 2015). Considering protocol deviations, sample size was 35 participants. Results Between Feb 4, 2019, and May 24, 2022, 35 patients enrolled from four Japanese hospitals. The median age was 61 years (range, 26 - 81 years); 19 patients were male and 16 were female and 16, 12, and 7 patients had low,intermediate, and high Sokal scores, respectively. Ten patients had hypertension, five had diabetes millitus, three had chronic heart disease, two had solid tumor, and one had cerebrovascular disease, respectively. Numbers of patients with previous TKIs were one for 19 (54%), two for 12 (34%) and three for 4 (11%), respectively and prior TKIs are imatinib (8, 23%), dasatinib (27, 77%), nilotinib (16, 46%) and bosutinib (1, 3%), respectively. In the intention to treat population, the bosutinib discontinuation rate at 12 months was 25.7% (95% CI, 15.6-39.3%) which is significantly lower than that of the previous report (v.s. 43.0%, p=0.019). Similarly, bosutinib discontinuation rate due to DRTs was 11.4% (95% CI, 5.2 - 23.2%), which is also significantly lower (v.s. 32%, p = 0.005). These results suggest lower initiating dose of bosutinib reduced bosutinib discontinuation rate due to DRTs, thus the primary endpoint was met. A total of 22 patients (62.9%) interrupted bosutinib at least once. Median bosutinib dosage, bosutinib dosing days and relative dose intensity until 12 months were 391.7 (204.9-477.3) mg/day, 351.0 (20-365) days and 78% (41-95), respectively. 28 patients (80.0%) achieved cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 6 months; cumulative incidence of MMR and DMR at 12 months were 23 (65.7%; 95%CI, 49.2-79.2%) and 15 (42.9%; 95%CI, 28.0-59.1%), indicating these secondary endpoints were comparable with the previous report. Grade 3 to 4 transaminase elevation was 20% which is comparable with the previous report (v.s. 29%, p=0.427), while a lower rate of diarrhea (3%; v.s. 25%, p=0.009) was notable. Conclusion The lower initiating dose followed by a gradual dose increase of bosutinib reduced the drug discontinuation rate due to severe DRTs, especially diarrhea, while efficacy was assured.