Major Postoperative Morbidity Research Articles

Impact of Routine and Selective Preoperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with Stent Placement on Postoperative and Oncologic Outcomes Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Background: According to current guidelines, preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with biliary stenting (ERCP/stenting) is often necessary in patients with obstructive jaundice due to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), including severe jaundice (bilirubin > 250 umol/l), pruritus, cholangitis, cholestatic liver dysfunction, renal failure, severe malnutrition, or delayed surgery for tumors requiring neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative ERCP/stenting on postoperative and long-term outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC. Methods: Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent partial/total PD for PDAC between 2012 and 2019 in two hepato-pancreato-biliary centers in Germany and Switzerland were assessed. We compared patients treated with preoperative ERCP/stenting with those directly undergoing surgery according to postoperative morbidity, postoperative mortality, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: During the study period, 192 patients underwent partial/total PD for PDAC. ERCP/stenting was performed in 105 patients, and 87 patients underwent resection without prior intervention. Postoperative 90-day overall morbidity rate (71% vs. 56%, p = 0.029) and superficial surgical site infection (SSI) rate (39% vs. 17%, p < 0.001) were significantly worse following preoperative ERCP/stenting. Major postoperative morbidity rate (18% vs. 21%, p = 0.650), organ/space SSI rate (7% vs. 14%, p = 0.100), and 90-day postoperative mortality rate (4% vs. 2%, p = 0.549) did not significantly differ between the two groups. After excluding 44 patients for whom the indication for ERCP/stenting was not consistent with current guidelines, ERCP/stenting was associated with a higher superficial SSI rate (36% vs. 17%, p = 0.009) and shorter length of stay (12 vs. 16 days, p = 0.004). Median OS (ERCP/stenting: 18 months vs. no ERCP/stenting: 23 months, p = 0.490) and median DFS (ERCP/stenting: 14 months vs. no ERCP/stenting: 18 months, p = 0.645) were independent from the utilization of ERCP/stenting. Conclusions: Preoperative ERCP/stenting in patients with PDAC can be performed without increasing organ/space SSI, major perioperative morbidity, and mortality rates and without worsening oncologic outcomes. However, it is associated with higher superficial SSI rates. If ERCP/stenting is not performed routinely but according to current guidelines, it is also associated with a shorter length of hospital stay. Further refinement of the indications for preoperative ERCP/stenting may reduce superficial SSI rates.

Association between the Achievement of Textbook Outcomes in Liver Surgery (TOLS) and Overall Survival in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Patients Following Major Hepatectomy: A Multicenter Study.

Introduction Major hepatectomy is the mainstay of curative-intent resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) patients. Textbook Outcomes in Liver Surgery (TOLS) are a new composite parameter for evaluating the short-term outcomes of surgery; however, their association with overall survival (OS) is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between TOLS and OS in pCCA patients following major hepatectomy. Methods Consecutive pCCA patients who underwent major hepatectomy between 2014 and 2020 at 5 hospitals were included in this analysis. TOLS were defined as no intraoperative grade ≥ 2 incidents, no postoperative grade B/C bile leakage, no postoperative grade B/C liver failure, no postoperative major morbidity, no readmission within 90 days due to surgery-related major morbidity, no mortality within 90 days after hospital discharge, and R0 resection. The Kaplan‒Meier method was used to compare OS rates between patients who achieved TOLS and those who did not. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for poor OS. Results In total, 399 patients were included in this study, 214 (53.6%) of whom achieved TOLS. After excluding patients who died within 90 days, the 5-year OS rate of patients who achieved TOLS were significantly greater than that of patients who did not achieve TOLS (5-year OS rate: 26.2% vs. 17.3%, P=0.001). TOLS were independently associated with OS for pCCA patients following major hepatectomy. Conclusions TOLS were achieved in approximately half of the pCCA patients following major hepatectomy, and the patients who achieved TOLS had better survival.

Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Malignancy: Trends Over 15 Years in Major Morbidity, Mortality, and Patient Selection From The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

We examined trends in major morbidity and mortality following total gastrectomy for malignancy in a national cohort. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was used to identify patients who underwent total gastrectomy for malignancy from 2007 to 2021. Joinpoint regression was used to determine annual percent changes (APCs) in thirty-day postoperative major morbidity, mortality, and length of stay (LOS). Major morbidity included deep and organ space surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, cardiac event, pneumonia, acute renal failure, sepsis, and respiratory failure. Of 3515 patients, the median age was 65 years (IQR = 55-73), 59% were male, and 57.9% were White. Major morbidity was 23%, which did not change over time (APC = -1.4, 95% CI = -3.4 to 0.58), nor were there changes in individual morbidities with time. The most common morbidities were organ space surgical site infection (9.2%) and pneumonia (8.5%). Mortality rate in the study cohort was 2.7% and did not change (APC = -6.2, 95% CI = -13.0 to 1.1). LOS (median 9 days) also did not vary with time (APC = -2.3, 95% CI = -7.8 to 3.9). There was an increase in patients with diabetes (21.6% vs. 11.2%, p < 0.05), BMI ≥ 30 (31.1% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.05), and ASA IV-V status (11.6% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.05). Morbidity and mortality following total gastrectomy for malignancy have not significantly changed over the last fifteen years. While this may in part be explained by increased patient comorbidity, efforts should be made to improve patient selection and mitigate postoperative complications to allow for timely adjuvant therapies.

Preoperative Anemia and Iron Deficiency in Elective Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery Patients.

Preoperative anemia can impact postoperative outcomes, but its importance in gastrointestinal cancer patients, and significance of anemia etiology remains unclear. We aimed to characterize the frequency and impact of preoperative anemia, and iron-deficiency anemia (IDA), on perioperative outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal cancer surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of perioperative RBC transfusion. Secondary outcomes included 90-day postoperative major morbidity, ICU admission, and 90-day hospital readmission. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess the association between preoperative anemia and IDA and outcomes. Preoperative anemia was present in 55.5% of patients (n = 15 414), and 58.3% of anemic patients were iron deficient. Preoperative anemia was independently associated with increased risk of RBC transfusion (RR 2.88, 95% CI 2.60-3.20), and secondary outcomes. For every preoperative hemoglobin decrease of 1 g/dL, the adjusted risk of perioperative RBC transfusion increased by 40% (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.37-1.42). Preoperative anemia is prevalent, and an independent risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes. Decreases in preoperative hemoglobin levels elevate the risk of transfusion and adverse outcomes, supporting further study to optimize management of treatable causes of preoperative anemia including IDA.

Results of complete cytoreductive strategy in patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin with or without extraperitoneal metastases: A bicentric analysis

BackgroundIncreased survival can be achieved in patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) treated with cytoreductive surgery. The benefit of this strategy remains uncertain when CRPM are associated with extraperitoneal metastases (EPM). The aim of this study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of patients treated with CRS for CRPM, with or without EPM. MethodsThis study included 413 consecutive patients who underwent CRS for CRPM: 120 with EPM (EPM+) and 293 without (EPM-). Patients with isolated ovarian metastases were included in EPM-group (n = 83). ResultsEPM were mainly located to the liver (66 %,n = 79), retroperitoneal lymph nodes (33 %,n = 40); less frequently to the spleen (9 %,n = 12), lung (9 %,n = 10) or pleura (1 %,n = 1). Ovarian metastases were present in 126 patients (83 in EMP-, 43 in EPM+). Peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was similar in EPM- (8 [4–14]) and EPM+ (8 [3–13],p = 0.335) groups, as postoperative mortality (3 % vs 3 %,p = 1) and major morbidity rates (28 % vs 35 %,p = 0.223). Median overall survival (mOS) and disease-free survival were significantly higher in the EPM-group (58m vs 39m, and 16m vs 10m,p = 0.003). We highlighted 3 prognostic groups 1) EPM-with PCI<10 (mOS 93m), 2) EPM+ with PCI<10 (mOS 57m), 3) EPM-with 10<PCI<15 (mOS 35m) or EPM+ with 10<PCI<15 (mOS 31m) or PCI>15 regardless EPM (mOS 26m, p < 0.001). ConclusionComplete cytoreductive surgery seems to be feasible in patients with EPM, without increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality compared to patients without EPM. This strategy provides prolonged survival in selected patients with limited peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer.

ThP4.9 - The role of preoperative nutritional assessment in postoperative outcomes of hepato-pancreato-biliary patients: A bicenter prospective observational study

Abstract Aims Preoperative nutritional status of patients who undergo surgery due to hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) cancer has been considered as a prognostic factor of their postoperative course. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association of preoperative nutritional assessment with the postoperative morbidity and mortality in such patients. Methods Patients undergoing surgery due to HPB cancer from March 2022 until March 2023 at two university surgical departments were included in the present study. Patients’ demographics and postoperative parameters, such as complications’ severity according to Clavien-Dindo classification and mortality, along with malignancy stage were reported. Preoperative nutritional assessment was conducted according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score. The present study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05795374). Results The present study included 66 patients with a mean age of 63 ± 12 years old. The high risk of malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria was associated with major (Clavien-Dindo≥3) postoperative complications (74% vs 32%, p=0.026) and increased 30-day mortality (80% vs 23%, p=0.021). Moreover, malnutrition according to the CONUT tool was correlated to increased 30-day mortality (66% vs 45%, p=0.016). Conclusions Preoperative malnutrition seems to be associated with higher rates of postoperative mortality and major morbidity in patients undergoing surgery due to HPB cancer.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Major Morbidity, Anastomotic Leakage, Re-Surgery and Mortality in Patients with Colonic Perforation.

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to determine the risk factors associated with postoperative major morbidity, anastomotic/suture leakage, re-surgery and mortality in patients undergoing emergency surgery for colonic perforation. Methods: A total of 204 adult patients treated surgically for colonic perforation from 2016 to 2021 at the University Hospital Erlangen were included in a retrospective analysis. Patient demographics and pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters were obtained and evaluated among various outcome groups (in-hospital major morbidity, anastomotic/suture leakage, re-surgery and 90-day mortality). Results: Postoperative in-hospital major morbidity, anastomotic/suture leakage, need of re-surgery and 90-day mortality occurred in 45%, 12%, 25% and 12% of the included patients, respectively. Independent risk factors for in-hospital major morbidity were identified and included the presence of any comorbidity, a significantly reduced preoperative general condition, the localization of perforation in the right hemicolon and the need for an intraoperative blood transfusion. The only independent risk factor for anastomotic/suture leakage was the presence of any comorbidity, whereas no independent risk factors for re-surgery were found. An age > 65 years, a significantly reduced preoperative general condition and the need for an intraoperative blood transfusion were independent risk factors for 90-day mortality. Conclusions: Our study identified risk factors impacting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing emergency surgery for colonic perforation. These patients should receive enhanced postoperative care and may benefit from individualized and targeted therapeutic approaches.

625. PHASE II TRIAL OF INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY CHEMORADIATION AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS

Abstract Background Most patients with esophageal cancer (EC) present locally advanced disease. Currently, multimodal strategies as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy are employed, but still have high local and distant failures rates. This study evaluated the results of a phase II protocol with induction chemotherapy (IC) and concurrent chemoradiation (CR) before surgery for locally advanced carcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (EGJ). The primary end point was to evaluate pathological complete remission (PCR) rate at surgical specimen. A PCR ≥ 30% was considered promising for further study. Methods Patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma (AC) of the thoracic esophagus and JEG, clinical stage T1b-3, N0-2, M0, PS 0-2, underwent two cycles of IC with carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by CR with the same agents and minimally invasive esophagectomy. At the screening, 14 days after the first cycle of IC and 6-8 weeks after the CR, metabolic responses were accessed by PET-CT and classified according the PERCIST criteria. Results One hundred and twenty-nine patients were accrued from January 2017 to April 2023. Forty-seven patients started the trial and 45 completed the neoadjuvant part of the protocol. Most patients were male (73.3%), the median age of was 55 years and AC was the most prevalent histological subtype (53.3%). Grade 3/4 toxicity during IC were infrequent and included neutropenia (12.5%), anemia (6.2%) and dysphagia (10.4%). Lymphopenia (10.7%) and dysphagia (6.5%) were the most common grade 3/4 toxicity during CR. All cases received the full radiotherapy dose of 45 Gy by IMRT technique. Thirty-seven patients underwent surgery and 31 had minimally invasive MacKeown esophagectomy with complete tumor resection (R0). Sixty-four percent of all included patients completed the neoadjuvant therapy and survived for 30 days after surgery. The most prevalent postoperative complications were anastomotic fistula (29%) and pneumonia (19%). Median hospital stay was 12 (7-56) days. Six patients (19.3%) had major postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb), 4 were reoperated and one (3.2%) died during hospitalization. The median number of lymph nodes retrieved was 24. Eleven patients (33.5%) had pathological positive lymph nodes. The overall pathological complete response rate was 25.8%, 41.8% for SCC and 15.8% for AC. The early metabolic evaluation by PERCIST showed that 2 cases (4.4%) had progressive disease (PD), 26 (57.7%) stable disease (SD), 15 (33.3%) partial response (PR) and 2 (4.4%) complete response (CR). All the CR were SCC. The late metabolic response analysis showed that 1 (2.4%) patient had PD, 6 (14.6%) SD, 23 (56%) PR and 11 (27%) CR. On the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis, the median overall survival was 31.4 months, whereas the five-year overall survival was 31.2%. After curative surgery, 12 patients had recurrence disease. Six (19%) patients had recurrences at distant sites, 4 (12.9%) had loco-regional recurrence and 2 (6.4%) had both patterns. Conclusion This intensified neoadjuvant regimen was efficacious and safe in patients with locally advanced EC, but failed to reach the defined efficacy goal for further investigation, especially for AC.

Single large hepatocellular carcinoma > 5 cm with surgical indication: is it mandatory a major hepatectomy? a propensity-score weighted analysis.

Single large hepatocellular carcinoma >5cm (SLHCC) traditionally requires a major liver resection. Minor resections are often performed with the goal to reduce morbidity and mortality. Aim of the study was to establish if a major resection should be considered the best treatment for SLHCC or a more limited resection should be preferred. A multicenter retrospective analysis of the HE.RC.O.LE.S. Group register was performed. All collected patients with surgically treated SLHCC were divided in 5 groups of treatment (major hepatectomy, sectorectomy, left lateral sectionectomy, segmentectomy, non-anatomical resection) and compared for baseline characteristics, short and long-term results. A propensity-score weighted analysis was performed. 535 patients were enrolled in the study. Major resection was associated with significantly increased major complications compared to left lateral sectionanectomy, segmentectomy and non-anatomical resection (all p<0.05) and borderline significant increased major complications compared to sectorectomy (p=0.08). Left lateral sectionectomy showed better overall survival compared to major resection (p=0.02), while other groups of treatment resulted similar to major hepatectomy group for the same item. Absence of oncological benefit after major resection and similar outcomes among the 5 groups of treatment was confirmed even in the sub-population excluding patients with macrovascular invasion. Major resection was associated to increased major post-operative morbidity without long-term survival benefit; when technically feasible and oncologically adequate, minor resections should be preferred for the surgical treatment of SLHCC.

Reconstruction Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy for Cancer: Insights From the GastroBenchmark and GASTRODATA databases.

Various anastomotic and reconstruction techniques are used for minimally invasive total (miTG) and distal gastrectomy (miDG). Their effects on postoperative morbidity have not been extensively studied. MiTG and miDG patients were selected from 9356 oncological gastrectomies performed in 2017-2021 in 43 centers. Endpoints included anastomotic leakage (AL) rate and postoperative morbidity tested by multivariable analysis. Three major anastomotic techniques [circular stapled (CS); linear stapled (LS); and hand sewn (HS)], and 3 major bowel reconstruction types [Roux (RX); Billroth I (BI); Billroth II (BII)] were identified in miTG (n=878) and miDG (n=3334). Postoperative complications, including AL (5.2% vs 1.1%), overall (28.7% vs 16.3%), and major morbidity (15.7% vs 8.2%), as well as 90-day mortality (1.6% vs 0.5%) were higher after miTG compared with miDG. After miTG, the AL rate was higher after CS (4.3%) and HS (7.9%) compared with LS (3.4%). Similarly, major complications (LS: 9.7%, CS: 16.2%, and HS: 12.7%) were lowest after LS. Multivariate analysis confirmed anastomotic technique as a predictive factor for AL, overall, and major complications. In miDG, AL rate (BI: 1.4%, BII 0.8%, and RX 1.2%), overall (BI: 14.5%, BII: 15.0%, and RX: 18.7%), and major morbidity (BI: 7.9%, BII: 9.1%, and RX: 7.2%), and mortality (BI: 0%, BII: 0.1%, and RY: 1.1%%) were not affected by bowel reconstruction. In oncologically suitable situations, miDG should be preferred to miTG, as postoperative morbidity is significantly lower. LS should be a preferred anastomotic technique for miTG in Western Centers. Conversely, bowel reconstruction in DG may be chosen according to the surgeon's preference.

Emergency Resection for Colonic Cancer Has an Independent and Unfavorable Effect on Long-Term Oncologic Outcome

BackgroundLong-term outcomes in patients undergoing emergency versus elective resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) remain controversial. This study aims to assess short- and long-term outcomes of emergency versus elective CRC surgery.MethodsIn this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing emergency or elective colonic resections for CRC from January 2013 to December 2017 were included. Primary outcome was long-term survival. As secondary outcomes, we sought to analyze potential differences on postoperative morbidity and concerning the oncological standard of surgical resection. The Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare survival between the groups.ResultsOverall, 225 CRC patients were included. Of these 192 (85.3%) had an elective and 33 (14.7%) an emergency operation. Emergency indications were due to obstruction, perforation, or bleeding. Patients in the emergency group had higher ASA score (p = 0.023), higher Charlsson comorbidity index (CCI, p = 0.012), and were older than those in the elective group, with median age 70 (IQR 63–79) years and 78 (IQR 68–83) years, for elective and emergency, respectively (p = 0.020). No other preoperative differences were observed. Patients in the emergency group experienced significantly more major complications (12.1% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.037), more anastomotic leakage (12.1% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.001), need for reoperation (12.1% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.021), and postoperative mortality (2 patients vs. 0, p < 0.001). No differences in terms of final pathological stage, nor in accuracy of lymphadenectomy were observed. Overall survival was significantly worse in case of emergency operation, with estimated median 41 months vs. not reached in elective cases (p < 0.001). At the multivariate analysis, emergency operation was confirmed as independent unfavorable determinant of survival (with hazard rate HR = 1.97, p = 0.028), together with age (HR = 1.05, p < 0.001), postoperative major morbidity (HR = 3.18, p = 0.012), advanced stage (HR = 5.85, p < 0.001), and need for transfusion (HR = 2.10, p = 0.049).ConclusionPostoperative morbidity and mortality were increased in emergency versus elective CRC resections. Despite no significant differences in terms of accuracy of resection and pathological stages, overall survival was significantly worse in patients who underwent emergency procedure, and independent of other determinants of survival.

Reduced-port robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with optimized surgical field deployment: early results of single-site plus-two ports method

BackgroundThe adoption of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is increasing globally. Meanwhile, reduced-port RPD (RPRPD) remains uncommon, requiring robot-specific techniques not possible with laparoscopy. We introduce a unique RPRPD technique optimizing surgical field exposure.MethodsOur RPRPD utilizes a single-site plus-two ports technique, facilitated by a single-port platform through a 5-cm incision. The configuration of robotic arms (arm1, arm2, arm3, and arm4) were strategically designed for optimal procedural efficiency, with the arms2 and arm3, alongside the assistant trocar, mounted on the single-port platform, while the arms1 and arm4 were positioned laterally across the abdomen. Drainage was established via channels created at the arm1 and arm4 insertion sites. A “gooseneck traction” was principally employed with the robotic instrument to prop up the specimen rather than grasp, improving the surgical field’s visibility and access. Clinical outcomes of patients who underwent RPRPD performed between August 2020 and September 2023 by a single surgeon across two centers in Taiwan and Japan were reviewed.ResultsFifty patients underwent RPRPD using the single-site plus-two ports technique. The gooseneck traction technique enabled goodsurgical field deployment and allowed for unrestricted movement of robotic arms with no collisions with the assistant instruments. The median operative time was 351 min (250–488 min), including 271 min (219–422 min) of console time and three minutes (2–10 min) of docking time. The median estimated blood loss was 80 mL (1–872 mL). All RPRPD procedures were successfully performed without the need for conversion to open surgery. Postoperative major morbidity (i.e., Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) was observed in 6 (12%) patients and median postoperative hospital stay was 13 days.ConclusionsThe single-site plus-two ports RPRPD with the gooseneck traction proves to be a safe, feasible option, facilitating surgical field visibility and robotic arm maneuverability.Graphical

Intraoperative intraductal ultrasonography of the main pancreatic duct during pancreatoduodenectomy: technical description of a pilot series.

The intraoperative risk stratification during pancreatoduodenectomy is gaining increasing significance. The main pancreatic duct wall is of particular importance as it represents the element of anchor of the anastomotic stiches. This study aims to describe the safety, feasibility, and reproducibility of a novel intraductal ultrasonography of the main pancreatic (MPD)-Wirsung duct (IWU) during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).A prospective series of 58 patients underwent PD with anastomosis between the MPD and the jejunum. Just before the reconstructive phase, the remaining pancreatic stump underwent complete IWU with definition of Wirsung thickness (WT) at the anastomotic site, using a radial ultrasound probe of 1.7mm in diameter.No IWU-related complications were reported. The median WT of the MPD was 1.1mm (SD 0.2). The rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), major morbidity, and mortality were 17, 5, and 0%, respectively.The use of IWU during PD demonstrated safety and feasibility. IWU represents a new tool aimed at determining structural characteristics of the MPD that could impact on the surgical strategy of the pancreatic anastomosis. Further validation and comparative analysis with the current standard of care are warranted within a prospective controlled framework.

Is conventional functional liver remnant volume higher than 40% still sufficient to prevent post-hepatectomy liver failure in jaundiced patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma? A single-center experience in China.

Our study aims to evaluate the predictive accuracy of functional liver remnant volume (FLRV) in post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) among surgically-treated jaundiced patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). We retrospectively reviewed surgically-treated jaundiced patients with HCCA between June, 2000 and June, 2018. The correlation between FRLV and PHLF were analyzed. The optimal cut off value of FLRV in jaundiced HCCA patients was also identified and its impact was furtherly evaluated. A total of 224 jaundiced HCCA patients who received a standard curative resection (43 patients developed PHLF) were identified. Patients with PHLF shared more aggressive clinic-pathological features and were generally in a more advanced stage than those without PHLF. An obvious inconsistent distribution of FLRV in patients with PHLF and those without PHLF were detected. FLRV (continuous data) had a high predictive accuracy in PHLF. The newly-acquired cut off value (FLRV = 53.5%, sensitivity = 81.22%, specificity = 81.4%) showed a significantly higher predictive accuracy than conventional FLRV cut off value (AUC: 0.81 vs. 0.60, p < 0.05). Moreover, patients with FLRV lower than 53.5% also shared a significantly higher major morbidity rate as well as a worse prognosis, which were not detected for FLRV of 40%. For jaundiced patients with HCCA, a modified FLRV of 53.5% is recommended due to its great impact on PHLF, as well as its correlation with postoperative major morbidities as well as overall prognosis, which might help clinicians to stratify patients with different therapeutic regimes and outcomes. Future multi-center studies for training and validation are required for further validation.

Reoperative extended arch repair for acute type A aortic dissection after previous cardiac surgery: insights from a relatively young redo series.

To evaluate the impact of previous cardiac surgery (PCS) on clinical outcomes after reoperative extended arch repair for acute type A aortic dissection. This study included 37 acute type A aortic dissection patients with PCS (PCS group) and 992 without PCS (no-PCS group). Propensity score-matching yielded a subgroup of 36 pairs (1:1). In-hospital outcomes and mid-term survival were compared between the 2 groups. The PCS group was older (56.7 ± 14.2 vs 52.2 ± 12.6 years, P = 0.036) and underwent a longer cardiopulmonary bypass (median, 212 vs 183 min, P < 0.001) compared with the no-PCS group. Operative death occurred in 88 (8.6%) patients, exhibiting no significant difference between groups (13.5% vs 8.4%, P = 0.237). Major postoperative morbidity was observed in 431 (41.9%) patients, also showing no difference between groups (45.9% vs 41.7%, P = 0.615). Moreover, the multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that PCS was not significantly associated with operative mortality (adjusted odds ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 0.91-7.29, P = 0.075) or major morbidity (adjusted odds ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval 0.88-4.18, P = 0.101). The 3-year cumulative survival rates were 71.1% for the PCS group and 83.9% for the no-PCS group (log-rank P = 0.071). Additionally, Cox regression indicated that PCS was not significantly associated with midterm mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 0.44-4.41, P = 0.566). After matching, no significant differences were found between groups in terms of operative mortality (P > 0.999), major morbidity (P > 0.999) and midterm survival (P = 0.564). No significant differences were found between acute type A aortic dissection patients with PCS and those without PCS regarding in-hospital outcomes and midterm survival after extended arch repair.

Morbidity following robot-assisted surgery in a gynecological oncology setting: A cohort study.

The objective of the study was to provide a comprehensive description of perioperative morbidity associated with robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in a gynecological oncology setting in order to improve the preoperative counseling of women and support shared decision-making. All women scheduled for intended RAS between January 2015 and December 2022 were prospectively included in an electronic morbidity database for the analyses of perioperative complications. In total, 2225 women were included. Sixty-four patients (2.9%) experienced an intraoperative complication. Intraoperative complications were associated with a higher rate of conversion to laparotomy (15.6% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.001), a higher rate of major postoperative morbidity (9.3% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of reoperation (9.3% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001), compared to cases without intraoperative complications. Thirty-day postoperative morbidity was evaluated according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Surgical Secondary Events Grading System. Grade 3-5 events were considered major. A total of 57 patients (2.6%) experienced a major event after surgery, postoperative rupture of the vaginal vault being the most common complication requiring surgical intervention. Conversion to laparotomy occurred in 49 cases (2.2%) and was associated with higher intraoperative blood loss (300 mL vs. 25 mL, p < 0.001), a higher rate of postoperative major events (20.4% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of reoperation (11.8% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001). Our study demonstrates low rates of major perioperative morbidity and conversion to laparotomy after RAS performed by trained high-volume surgeons in a gynecological oncology setting.

Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in octogenarians: a single-center analysis

The rapidly aging population in industrialized countries comes with an increased incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) which presents new challenges for oncological treatments especially in elderly patients. Thus, the question arises to what extent the benefit of surgical resections, as the only curative treatment option, outweighs possible perioperative risks in patients ≥ 80 years of age (octogenarians). We therefore retrospectively analyzed 311 patients who underwent resection for iCC at Hannover Medical School between January 1996 and December 2022. In total, there were 11 patients older than 80 years in our collective. Despite similar tumor size, octogenarians underwent comparatively less extensive surgery (54.5% major resections in octogenarians vs. 82.7% in all other patients; p = 0.033) with comparable rates of lymphadenectomy and tumor-free resection margins. Furthermore, we did not observe increased major postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa complications: 27.3% vs. 34.3% in all other patients; p = 0.754) or mortality (estimated 1-year OS of 70.7% vs. 72.5% in all other patients, p = 0.099). The length of intensive care unit (ICU) or intermediate care unit (IMC) stay was significantly longer in octogenarians, however, with a comparable length in total hospital stay. The estimated overall survival (OS) did also not differ significantly, although a trend towards reduced long-term survival was observed (14.5 months vs. 28.03 months in all other patients; p = 0.099). In conclusion, primary resection is a justifiable and safe therapeutic option even in octogenarians but requires an even more thorough preoperative patient selection.

A Comparison of Preoperative Predictive Scoring Systems for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy Based on a Single-Center Analysis.

Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is associated with major postoperative morbidity and mortality. Several scoring systems have been described to stratify patients into risk groups according to the risk of POPF. The aim of this study was to compare scoring systems in patients who underwent a PD. Methods: A total of 196 patients undergoing PD from July 2019 to June 2022 were identified from a prospectively maintained database of the University Hospital Ghent. After performing a literature search, four validated, solely preoperative risk scores and the intraoperative Fistula Risk Score (FRS) were included in our analysis. Furthermore, we eliminated the variable blood loss (BL) from the FRS and created an additional score. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for all risk factors, followed by a ROC analysis for the six scoring systems. Results: All scores showed strong prognostic stratification for developing POPF (p < 0.001). FRS showed the best predictive accuracy in general (AUC 0.862). FRS without BL presented the best prognostic value of the scores that included solely preoperative variables (AUC 0.783). Soft pancreatic texture, male gender, and diameter of the Wirsung duct were independent prognostic factors on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Although all predictive scoring systems stratify patients accurately by risk of POPF, preoperative risk stratification could improve clinical decision-making and implement preventive strategies for high-risk patients. Therefore, the preoperative use of the FRS without BL is a potential alternative.

Multicenter propensity score-matched analysis to compare perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic or robotic complex hepatectomy for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundPostoperative complications are vital factors affecting the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially for complex hepatectomy. The present study aimed to compare perioperative complications between laparoscopic and robotic complex hepatectomy (LCH vs. RCH). MethodsPatients with solitary HCC after complex hepatectomy were collected from a multicenter database. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was adopted to control confounding bias. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors. Results436 patients were included. After PSM, 43 patients were included in both the LCH and RCH groups. The results showed that compared to LCH, RCH had lower rates of blood loss and transfusion, and lower postoperative 30-day and major morbidity, and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) (all P < 0.05). Additionally, the length of hospital stay was shorter in the RCH group (P = 0.026). Multivariable analysis showed RCH is an independent protective factor for reducing the 30-day morbidity, major morbidity and PHLF. ConclusionRCH has advantages over LCH in the minimally invasive treatment of complex HCC, as it can reduce the incidence of postoperative morbidity. Therefore, RCH should be considered for patients with HCC who require complex hepatectomy.

Non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias: results of transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches at a fourth-level hospital.

The objective of this study is to elucidate the clinical and demographic profiles, as well as perioperative outcomes, of patients undergoing surgery for non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias. Additionally, it aims to analyse these outcomes based on the surgical approach employed (transthoracic versus transabdominal). This retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single center and involved patients diagnosed with non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernia who underwent either emergency or elective surgery between July 2007 and March 2023. Clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes of these patients were compared using appropriate statistical tests.The research protocol for this observational, retrospective, and comparative study followed the Declaration of Helsinki's ethical requirements. The need for Clinical Research Ethics Committee approval was waived according to our institutional law because the study was a retrospective cohort study based on anonymous data of patients. Informed consent was waived because this study involved the secondary analysis of patient medical records. Additionally, this study followed the STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies. The analysis included 22 patients being 59.1% men, with median age of 61years. The predominant clinical presentation was restrictive lung disease (40.9%). The majority of cases (68%) had traumatic aetiology with a median defect size of 4cm (range of 3-8cm). Elective surgery was performed in 15 cases (68.1%) and transthoracic approach was employed in 13 patients (54.5%). Postoperative major morbidity reached 27.2% and mortality within 30days was 9.1%. Emergency surgeries accounted for 44.4% of transabdominal interventions, compared to 23% in the transthoracic subgroup (p = 0.376). There were no statistically significant differences between the transabdominal and trasnthoracic approaches in terms of global postoperative complications (88.8% vs. 84.6%, p = 1), major complications (44.4% vs 15.4%, p = 0.734), mortality (11.1% v 7.6%, p = 1) and recurrence (11.1% vs 7.6%, p = 1). Postoperative stay was significantly shorter in the transthoracic subgroup (6days vs. 14days, p = 0.011). Non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias are characterized by significant postoperative major morbidity and mortality rates, standing at 27.2% and 9.1%, respectively, accompanied by a recurrence rate of 9.1%. Both transthoracic and transabdominal approaches demonstrate comparable short- and long-term outcomes.