Major Pathologic Response Research Articles

Circulating T cell status and molecular imaging may predict clinical benefit of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in oral cancer

BackgroundAddition of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition to standard-of-care interventions for locally advanced oral cancer could improve clinical outcome.MethodsIn this study, 16 evaluable patients with stage III/IV oral cancer were treated...

Tumor immune microenvironment remodeling and prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with and without immunotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Immunochemotherapy was an emerging neoadjuvant treatment mode that can potentially benefit patients with esophageal carcinoma, but its synergistic mechanism and impact on the tumor immune microenvironment were still unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) in tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling among patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and to evaluate the prognostic value of immune-related biomarkers and clinicopathological characteristics. Patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between December 2019 and March 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. We examined TME features and immune antigen-related biomarkers before and after neoadjuvant therapy. Logistic and Cox regression model were used to evaluate the correlation between these factors and other clinical features and outcomes. A total of 50 eligible participants were analyzed, including 31 males (62%), 25 patients of ≥65 years old, 4/28/18 of upper/middle/lower thoracic cancer, 25/17/8 of poor/moderate/high tumor differentiation, 8/42 of cT1+2/T3+4 stages and 30/20 of cN0/N+ stages. In the entire cohort, the rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) were 18% and 30%, respectively. pCR rates were 7.1% and 22.2% (χ2=0.699; P=0.40) MPR rates were 7.1% and 38.9% (χ2=4.837; P=0.03) in the nCT and nICT groups, respectively. Compared with the non-pCR patients, the pCR patients had a higher baseline programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) positive expression rate (16.7% vs. 77.8%, χ2=13.089; P<0.001). Following neoadjuvant therapy, the expression rates of PD-L1, CD3+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells in the tumor tissue was higher in the nICT group compared to the nCT group (P<0.05). Deficient expression of mismatch repair (MMR) genes was only observed in one patient (2%). Among patient-related biomarkers, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts decreased after treatment, with no significant changes in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio or platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Cox regression analysis showed that pretreatment, well-differentiated tumors and positive PD-L1 status were positive predictors of MPR (P<0.05). MPR was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.03). Compared to nCT, nICT could more significantly upregulates PD-L1 TPS, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), CD3+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells. Pretreatment tumor differentiation and PD-L1 TPS level could be predictive of MPR. Our findings suggested that the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy may be more beneficial for activating anti-tumor immunity in the TME.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Esophageal cancer is often overlooked in its early stages, with approximately 70% of patients being diagnosed at a locally advanced or late stage. Surgical treatment and chemotherapy are the mainstays of esophageal cancer management. However, for locally advanced esophageal cancer, both surgery alone and chemotherapy alone have high rates of recurrence and metastasis. The objective of the research was to investigate the security and therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) in the treatment of resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We conducted a literature search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), China Biomedical Literature Database, and Wanfang for studies published before November 2023 that investigated on the clinical effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable ESCC. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) was used for assessment, and Stata 17.0 was utilized for meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis. A total of 13 retrospective cohort studies involving 1,276 patients were included in this analysis. The NICT group showed a higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate [odds ratio (OR) =5.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.40-9.63]. The major pathologic response (MPR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), R0 resection rate, and 1-year overall survival (OS) in the NICT group were better than those in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) group (OR =3.70, 95% CI: 2.32-5.91; OR =2.22, 95% CI: 1.44-3.40; OR =2.63, 95% CI: 1.58-4.38; OR =10.08, 95% CI: 4.32-23.56). However, the NICT group also showed a drawback in terms of adverse reactions and postoperative complications. The incidence of rash (OR =4.69, 95% CI: 1.42-15.49) and pleural effusion (OR =3.99, 95% CI: 1.75-9.07) was significantly higher in the NCT group compared to the NICT group. The subgroup analysis indicates that the use of camrelizumab is associated with an increased incidence of rash. Additionally, performing a left thoracic esophagectomy and esophagogastric thoracic procedure significantly improved the R0 resection rate. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown promising efficacy in patients with locally advanced ESCC; however, it is linked to a higher occurrence of adverse events. Therefore, its use in clinical practice should be carefully considered.

Neoadjuvant therapy bridging percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy: a retrospective study.

Currently, there is no unified standard for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the treatments have their own advantages and disadvantages. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant therapy during the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) period before surgery in patients with NSCLC coexisting with CAD after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment. We retrospectively included 13 patients with T2aN0M0 (stage IB) NSCLC who also had concomitant CAD. After PCI treatment, neoadjuvant targeted or immunotherapy was administered based on the type of lung cancer, and the effects on treatment and impact on surgery were observed. The objective response rate (ORR) after neoadjuvant treatment in 13 patients was 53.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 25.1-80.8%], and the disease control rate (DCR) reached 100%. Ten patients (76.9%) experienced adverse events (AEs) ≤ grade 2. All patients underwent standard VATS lobectomy with lymph node dissection. One case (7.7%) required conversion to open thoracotomy, and all cases achieved R0 resection. The median operative time was 150 [interquartile range (IQR) 125-250] minutes, median intraoperative blood loss was 180 (IQR 150-235) mL, median postoperative drainage tube placement time was 4 (IQR 3-5) days, median total drainage volume was 1,310 (IQR 780-1,705) mL, and the median postoperative hospitalization was 7 (IQR 7-8) days. One patient (7.7%) experienced rapid atrial fibrillation. No deaths occurred. Postoperative pathological evaluation in three cases achieved major pathological response (MPR) (23.1%, 95% CI: 5-53.8%), with two cases achieving pathological complete response (pCR) (15.4%, 95% CI: 1.9-45.4%). The study presents initial evidence suggesting for the safety and feasibility of performing PCI treatment followed by neoadjuvant therapy during the DAPT period for patients with T2aN0M0 (IB) stage NSCLC coexisting with CAD. This approach presents a potential treatment option to control the disease while eliminating concerns about tumor progression and metastasis.

Anti-PD-(L)1-Based Neoadjuvant Therapy in Head and Neck Carcinoma: a Meta-analysis of Prospective Clinical Trials.

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiprogressive disease (PD)-(L)1-based neoadjuvant therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients and identify potential prognostic biomarkers. Databases were systematically searched for prospective clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-(L)1-based neoadjuvant therapy for HNSCC before January 12, 2024. We estimated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were further performed. A total of 570 patients from 20 studies were included. The pooled major pathological response (MPR), pathological complete response (pCR), and partial pathological response (PPR) rates were 30.7%, 15.3%, and 68.2%, respectively. Surgical complications, surgical delayed rate, all grade treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) and ≥Grade 3 TRAEs were 0.6%, 0.3%, 82.6%, and 9.7%, respectively. Best MPR or pCR rate was detected in patients receiving neoadjuvant anti-PD-(L)1 therapy + radiotherapy (with MPR rate of 75.5% and pCR rate of 51.1%) and neoadjuvant anti-PD-(L)1 therapy + chemotherapy groups (with MPR rate of 57.5% and pCR rate of 26.7%). No differences were detected in subgroups stratified by neoadjuvant treatment cycles, human papillomavirus (HPV) status, and tumor location. Patients with baseline Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥ 20 have higher MPR and pCR rates compared to patients with CPS < 20. High Tumor Cell Proportion Score was also associated with MPR and pCR. Objective response rate is a strong predictor of MPR (odds ratio [OR] = 7.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.20%-18.91%) and pCR (OR = 3.24, 95% CI = 1.40%-7.48%). Anti-PD-(L)1-based neoadjuvant therapy was effective and safe for HNSCC patients.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Surgery and postoperative adjuvant therapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), while neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NACI) is believed to lead better outcomes. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of NACI regimens in treating locally advanced resectable OSCC. Patients diagnosed with locally advanced resectable OSCC who received NACI and non-NACI were reviewed between December 2020 and June 2022 in our single center. The pathologic response was evaluated to the efficacy of NACI treatment. Adverse events apparently related to NACI treatment were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rate were assessed. Our analysis involved 104 patients who received NACI. Notably, the pathological complete response (PCR) rate was 47.1%, and the major pathological response (MPR) rate was 65.4%. The top three grade 1-2 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were alopecia (104; 100%), anemia (81; 77.9%) and pruritus (62; 59.6%). Importantly, patients achieving MPR exhibited higher programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS). The diagnostic value of CPS as a biomarker for NACI efficacy was enhanced when combined total cholesterol level. The 3-year estimated DFS rates were 89.0% in the NACI cohort compared to 60.8% in the non-NACI cohort, while the 3-year estimated OS rates were 91.3% versus 64.0%, respectively. The NACI treatment showed safe and encouragingly efficacious for locally advanced resectable OSCC patients. The high response rates and favorable prognosis suggest this approach as a potential treatment option. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate these findings.

Pulmonary function test-related prognostic models in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

This study aimed to establish a comprehensive clinical prognostic risk model based on pulmonary function tests. This model was intended to guide the evaluation and predictive management of patients with resectable stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Clinical pathological characteristics and prognostic survival data for 175 patients were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis were employed to identify variables and construct corresponding models. These variables were integrated to develop a ridge regression model. The models' discrimination and calibration were evaluated, and the optimal model was chosen following internal validation. Comparative analyses between the risk scores or groups of the optimal model and clinical factors were conducted to explore the potential clinical application value. Univariate regression analysis identified smoking, complete pathologic response (CPR), and major pathologic response (MPR) as protective factors. Conversely, T staging, D-dimer/white blood cell ratio (DWBCR), D-dimer/fibrinogen ratio (DFR), and D-dimer/minute ventilation volume actual ratio (DMVAR) emerged as risk factors. Evaluation of the models confirmed their capability to accurately predict patient prognosis, exhibiting ideal discrimination and calibration, with the ridge regression model being optimal. Survival analysis demonstrated that the disease-free survival (DFS) in the high-risk group (HRG) was significantly shorter than in the low-risk group (LRG) (P=2.57×10-13). The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) values at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 0.74, 0.81, and 0.79, respectively. Clinical correlation analysis revealed that men with lung squamous cell carcinoma or comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were predominantly in the LRG, suggesting a better prognosis and potentially identifying a beneficiary population for this treatment combination. The prognostic model developed in this study effectively predicts the prognosis of patients with NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. It offers valuable predictive insights for clinicians, aiding in developing treatment plans and monitoring disease progression.

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, dabrafenib and trametinib in BRAFV600-mutant resectable melanoma: the randomized phase 2 NeoTrio trial

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF-targeted therapy each improve survival in melanoma. Immune changes early during targeted therapy suggest the mechanisms of each drug class could work synergistically. In the non-comparative, randomized, phase 2 NeoTrio trial, we investigated whether targeted therapy could boost the proportion of patients achieving long-term recurrence-free survival with neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable stage III BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. Sixty patients (42% females) were randomized to pembrolizumab alone (n = 20), sequential therapy (dabrafenib plus trametinib followed by pembrolizumab; n = 20) or concurrent (triple) therapy (n = 20), followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy. The primary outcome was pathological response; secondary outcomes included radiographic response, recurrence-free survival, overall survival, surgical outcomes, peripheral blood and tumor analyses and safety. The pathological response rate was 55% (11/20; including six pathological complete responses (pCRs)) with pembrolizumab, 50% (10/20; three pCRs) with sequential therapy and 80% (16/20; ten pCRs) with concurrent therapy, which met the primary outcome in each arm. Treatment-related adverse events affected 75–100% of patients during neoadjuvant treatment, with seven early discontinuations (all in the concurrent arm). At 2 years, event-free survival was 60% with pembrolizumab, 80% with sequential therapy and 71% with concurrent therapy. Recurrences after major pathological response were more common in the targeted therapy arms, suggesting a reduction in response ‘quality’ when targeted therapy is added to neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Risking the curative potential of immunotherapy in melanoma cannot be justified. Pending longer follow-up, we suggest that immunotherapy and targeted therapy should not be combined in the neoadjuvant setting for melanoma. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02858921.

Neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with or without chemotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: A proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial

We conducted a proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial to assess neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with or without chemotherapy, followed by surgery or radiotherapy, and then consolidation SHR-1701 in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the primary cohort of patients receiving neoadjuvant combination therapy (n= 97), both primary endpoints were met, with a post-induction objective response rate of 58% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47-68) and an 18-month event-free survival (EFS) rate of 56.6% (95% CI 45.2-66.5). Overall, 27 (25%) patients underwent surgery; all achieved R0 resection. Among them, 12 (44%) major pathological responses and seven (26%) pathological complete responses were recorded. The 18-month EFS rate was 74.1% (95% CI 53.2-86.7) in surgical patients and 57.3% (43.0-69.3) in radiotherapy-treated patients. Neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with chemotherapy, followed by surgery or radiotherapy, showed promising efficacy with a tolerable safety profile in unresectable stage III NSCLC. Surgical conversion was feasible in a notable proportion of patients and associated with better survival outcomes.

Peripheral CD8+PD-1+ T cells as novel biomarker for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in humanized mice of non-small cell lung cancer

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown promising clinical activity in the treatment of early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, further clarification of the specific mechanism and identification of biomarkers are imperative prior to implementing it as a daily practice. The study investigated the reprogramming of T cells in both tumor and peripheral blood following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in a preclinical NSCLC mouse model engrafted with a human immune system. Samples were also collected from 21 NSCLC patients (Stage IA-IIIB) who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and the dynamics of potential biomarkers within these samples were measured and further subjected to correlation analysis with prognosis. Further, we initially investigated the sources of the potential biomarkers. We observed in the humanized mouse model, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy could prevent postoperative recurrence and metastasis by increasing the frequency and cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells in both peripheral blood (p<0.001) and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME)(p<0.001). The kinetics of peripheral CD8+PD-1+ T cells reflected the changes in the TIME and pathological responses, ultimately predicting survival outcome of mice. In the clinical cohort, patients exhibiting an increase in these T cells post-treatment had a higher rate of complete or major pathological response (p<0.05) and increased immune infiltration (p=0.0012, r=0.792). We identified these T cells originating from tumor draining lymph nodes and subsequently entering the TIME. In conclusion, the kinetics of peripheral CD8+PD-1+ T cells can serve as a predictor for changes in TIME and optimal timing for surgery, ultimately reflecting the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in both preclinical and clinical setting.

Neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 blockade plus platinum-based chemotherapy for potentially resectable oncogene-positive non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundWhether programmed cell death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blockade-based neoadjuvant treatment may benefit locally advanced oncogene-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains controversial. This retrospective study was designed to observe the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 blockade plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy and corresponding tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with resectable oncogene-positive NSCLC.MethodsPatients with potential resectable NSCLC harbouring oncogene alterations who had received neoadjuvant treatment were retrospectively recruited, and an oncogene-negative cohort of patients who received neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 blockade-based neoadjuvant treatment was reviewed for comparison during the same period. The primary aim was to observe the treatment efficacy and event-free survival (EFS) of these agents. Safety profile, molecular target, and immunologic factor data, including PD-L1 expression and tumour mutational burden (TMB), were also obtained.ResultsA total of 46 patients were recruited. Thirty-one of them harboured oncogene alterations, including EGFR, KRAS, ERBB2, ROS1, MET, RET, ALK, and FGFR3 alterations. Among the oncogene-positive patients, 18 patients received neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 blockade immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (oncogene-positive IO group), 13 patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or corresponding TKIs or TKIs alone (oncogene-positive chemo/TKIs group), and the other 15 patients were oncogene negative and received neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 blockade plus chemotherapy (oncogene-negative IO group). The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) rates were 22.2% (4 of 18) and 44.4% (8 of 18) in the oncogene-positive IO group, 0% (P = 0.120) and 23.1% (3 of 13) (P = 0.276) in the oncogene-positive chemo/TKIs group, and 46.7% (7 of 15) (P = 0.163) and 80.0% (12 of 15) (P = 0.072) in the oncogene-negative IO group, respectively. By the last follow-up, the median EFS time had not reached in the oncogene-positive IO group, and was 29.5 months in the oncogene-positive chemo/TKIs group and 38.4 months in the oncogene-negative IO group.ConclusionCompared with chemotherapy/TKIs treatment, neoadjuvant treatment with PD-(L)1 blockade plus platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with higher pCR/MPR rates in patients with partially resectable oncogene-mutant NSCLC, while the pCR/MPR rates were lower than their oncogene-negative counterparts treated with PD-(L)1 blockade-based treatment. Specifically, oncogene alteration types and other predictors of response to immunotherapy should be taken into account in clinical practice.

Neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: Phase 2 trial interim results (NEOTIDE/CTONG2104)

The clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy remains elusive in localized epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report interim results of a Simon's two-stage design, phase 2 trial using neoadjuvant sintilimab with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel in resectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC. All 18 patients undergo radical surgery, with one patient experiencing surgery delay. Fourteen patients exhibit confirmed radiological response, with 44% achieving major pathological response (MPR) and no pathological complete response (pCR). Similar genomic alterations are observed before and after treatment without influencing the efficacy of subsequent EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) invitro. Infiltration and Tcell receptor (TCR) clonal expansion of CCR8+ regulatory T (Treg)hi/CXCL13+ exhausted T (Tex)lo cells define a subtype of EGFR-mutant NSCLC highly resistant to immunotherapy, with the phenotype potentially serving as a promising signature to predict immunotherapy efficacy. Informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in EGFR-mutant NSCLC could help identify patients nonresponsive to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. These findings provide supportive data for the utilization of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and insight into immune resistance in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) plus chemotherapy or apatinib (a VEGFR-2 inhibitor) for initially unresectable stage II–III non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, two-arm, phase 2 exploratory study

This multicentre, two-arm, phase 2 study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy or apatinib in patients with initially unresectable stage II–III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligible patients regardless of PD-L1 expression received neoadjuvant camrelizumab 200 mg and platinum-doublet chemotherapy every 3 weeks (arm A) or those with PD-L1-positive tumors received neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib 250 mg once daily (arm B), for 2–4 cycles, followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR) rate. Thirty patients in arm A and 21 in arm B were enrolled. Surgery rates were 50.0% (15/30) in arm A and 42.9% (9/21) in arm B, with all patients achieving R0 resections. Of these patients, the MPR and pathological complete response rates were both 20.0% (95% CI 4.3–48.1) in arm A and were 55.6% (95% CI 21.2–86.3) and 11.1% (95% CI 0.3–48.2) in arm B, respectively. The corresponding objective response rates were 33.3% (95% CI 11.8–61.6) and 55.6% (95% CI 21.2–86.3). With a median follow-up of 22.4 months (95% CI 19.0–26.0), the median event-free survival was not reached (NR; 95% CI 13.6-NR) in arm A and 16.8 months (95% CI 8.6-NR) in arm B. Grade 3 or above treatment-related adverse events occurred in eight (26.7%) patients in arm A and three (14.3%) in arm B. Biomarker analysis showed baseline TYROBP expression was predictive of treatment response in arm B. Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy or apatinib exhibits preliminary efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with initially unresectable stage II–III NSCLC.

Optimizing perioperative treatment for potentially resectable stage III squamous cell lung carcinoma: promising results of a condensed four-cycle regimen with tislelizumaband chemotherapy

BackgroundThe standard care for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves perioperative therapy combining chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, typically lasting 6 to 12 months. However, the optimal treatment strategies for potentially resectable squamous cell lung carcinoma (SCC) remain unclear. This Phase 2 trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a condensed four-cycle perioperative treatment regimen with tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable stage III SCC.MethodsPatients with potentially resectable stage IIIA-IIIB (N2) SCC received intravenous tislelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and carboplatin for up to four cycles. The primary endpoints were major pathologic response (MPR) and incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Safety and potential biomarkers for efficacy prediction were also assessed.ResultsAmong 35 enrolled patients, 32 underwent surgery with R0 resection achieved in all cases. MPR was achieved in 24 patients and pathological complete response (pCR) in 14 patients. Radiographic objective response was observed in 31 patients. The 12-month and 24-month event-free survival rate was 85.7 and 61.0%, respectively. Four patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Tumor tissue based next-generation sequencing revealed the potential associations between several biomarkers and pathological response, including tumor neoantigen burden score, 18-gene expression profile score, CD8 + T cells, M1/M2 macrophages ratio and interferon‐gamma expression level. Besides, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and concentration were also associated with pathological response and the presence of ctDNA at postoperative month 1 was a strong predictor for disease relapse. Furthermore, metagenomic sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid demonstrated Streptococcus was the most abundant genus in the pCR group.ConclusionsA condensed four-cycle perioperative treatment regimen of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable toxicities in potentially resectable stage III SCC. Specific biomarkers showed potential for predicting treatment efficacy and the mechanism of superior antitumor response of pCR patients was preliminarily and indirectly explored.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05024266. Registered August 27, 2021.

Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA monitoring in predicting response to short-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Data from a phase III clinical trial (UNION).

LBA3606 Background: The data presented here is from a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled Phase III clinical study evaluating the feasibility of short-course radiotherapy (shortRT) sequentially combined with camrelizumab and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)(UNION). Our aim is to explore the value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based minimal residual disease (MRD) in assessing the comparative efficacy of short-course and long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: A total of 244 plasma samples from 79 LARC patients, who underwent NAT prior to curative surgery, were collected at baseline (C1), on-NAT (C2), post-NAT (C3), and post-surgery (C4). Deep targeted panel sequencing of 556 cancer-related genes was performed. The changes in genomic features and ctDNA-MRD status during treatment were monitored, and the relationship between these changes and treatment response were explored. Results: During NAT, the ctDNA-MRD positivity rate showed significant declining trends. Patients with high baseline TMB tend to show a significant inclination towards major pathological response and tumor regression grade 0/1 after NAT, while there is no significant correlation observed between baseline ctDNA-MRD status and treatment response. Interestingly, compared to long-course radiotherapy, microsatellite instability is more pronounced after shortRT ( P=0.042), and ctDNA negativity is significantly associated with pathological complete response (pCR) ( P=0.022). Furthermore, both ctDNA clearance ( P=0.049) and MRD clearance ( P=0.015) after shortRT are significantly correlated with pCR. A risk scoring predictive model based on ctDNA-MRD was established, with achieving the highest C-index at the C2 time point. This model, combining MRD clearance and CEA, outperforms models using only MRD clearance (AUC=0.917, 95% CI=0.753 to 1.000) or only CEA (AUC=0.733, 95% CI=0.449 to 1.000), demonstrating superior performance in predicting pCR/non-pCR (AUC=0.983, 95% CI=0.937 to 1.000). Conclusions: These findings offers valuable insights into the dynamic landscape of NAT for LARC management and emphasize the potential of ctDNA-based MRD assessment as a valuable tool for tailoring treatment strategies. The differences observed between shortCRT and longCRT regimens underscore the need for personalized treatment approaches. Overall, our study contributes valuable insights into optimizing treatment decision-making and predicting treatment response in LARC patients, ultimately advancing the field of rectal cancer management.

Radiation therapy (RT)-free pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (P+C) for PD-L1 TPS ≥50% locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC): Primary analysis from multicenter single arm phase II study (Evolution trial; WJOG11819L).

LBA8050 Background: Standard of care for unresectable LA-NSCLC is chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab (D). Survival curves of P monotherapy/P+C for PD-L1 TPS ≥50% stage IV NSCLC suggested possible comparable survival to CRT for stage III patients (pts). Moreover, some studies of neoadjuvant C+immunotherapy (I) for stage III pts have demonstrated high pathological complete response and major pathological response rates, implying potentially outstanding efficacy of C+I for earlier stage. We thus hypothesized P+C without RT in PD-L1 ≥50% LA-NSCLC pts provides a comparable efficacy to CRT followed by D while avoiding CRT-induced severe toxicities. Methods: This is a phase II study conducted by West Japan Oncology Group. P with platinum plus pemetrexed (PEM) (non-squamous) or P with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel (squamous) was administered every 3 weeks without RT. After four cycles of induction P+C, P with PEM (non-squamous) or P alone (squamous) was continued until progression or 2 years. The primary endpoint was 2 year-PFS rate (threshold/expected: 20%/45%). Results: Between May 2020 and February 2022, 21 pts were enrolled. Median age was 73 (range, 53-89). Stage IIIA/B/C included 11 (52%)/7 (33%)/3 (14%), respectively. Histologic subtypes were 14 (67%) adenocarcinoma, 5 (24%) squamous cell carcinoma, and 2 (10%) others. Median follow-up period was 29.9 (range, 0.3-44.2) months. Median number of P administrations was 30 (range, 1-35). The primary endpoint was met with 2-year PFS rate of 67% (90% CI: 46-83%). At the time of data cut-off, 13 (62%) of 21 pts were still progression-free. Median PFS and OS were not reached. Two-year OS rate was 85%. Centrally reviewed tumor response: 8 (38%) CR; 9 (43%) PR; 3 (14%) SD; and 1 (5%) NE were confirmed, resulting in overall response rate (ORR) of 81% and disease control rate of 95%. ORRs/2-year PFS rates of PD-L1 TPS 50-79% and 80-100% were 67%/56% and 92%/75%, respectively. Non-hematological AEs ≥grade 3 were observed in 11 (52%) pts, including: 2 (10%) pneumonitis; 2 (10%) pneumonia; 1 (5%) diarrhea; 1 (5%) ALT elevation; and 1 (5%) acute heart failure. There was one (5%) grade 5 AE (pneumonia). Conclusions: RT-free P+C provided long-lasting responses in approximately two-thirds of pts. Higher PD-L1 TPS cases achieved higher RR, including some CRs and higher 2-year PFS rate. To confirm our hypothesis that RT-free P+C can be a less toxic curative option in selected LA-NSCLC pts with PD-L1 TPS ≥50%, further data is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT04153734 .

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Mismatch Repair–Deficient Colon Cancer

BackgroundMismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) tumors can be found in 10 to 15% of patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer. In these patients, the efficacy of chemotherapy is limited. The use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown promising results, but data from studies of this approach are limited.MethodsWe conducted a phase 2 study in which patients with nonmetastatic, locally advanced, previously untreated dMMR colon cancer were treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The two primary end points were safety, defined by timely surgery (i.e., ≤2-week delay of planned surgery owing to treatment-related toxic events), and 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary end points included pathological response and results of genomic analyses.ResultsOf 115 enrolled patients, 113 (98%; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 93 to 100) underwent timely surgery; 2 patients had surgery delayed by more than 2 weeks. Grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 5 patients (4%), and none of the patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Among the 111 patients included in the efficacy analysis, a pathological response was observed in 109 (98%; 95% CI, 94 to 100), including 105 (95%) with a major pathological response (defined as ≤10% residual viable tumor) and 75 (68%) with a pathological complete response (0% residual viable tumor). With a median follow-up of 26 months (range, 9 to 65), no patients have had recurrence of disease.ConclusionsIn patients with locally advanced dMMR colon cancer, neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab had an acceptable safety profile and led to a pathological response in a high proportion of patients. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; NICHE-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03026140.)

Long-term efficacy of neoadjuvant-adjuvant targeted therapy in borderline resectable stage IIIB-D and IV melanoma.

Neoadjuvant-adjuvant therapy for locally advanced or potentially resectable metastatic melanoma was expected to improve operability and clinical outcomes over upfront surgery and adjuvant treatment only. Forty-seven consecutive patients were treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi)/MEK inhibitors (MEKi) and surgery. Twelve (26%) patients achieved a pathological complete response and 10 (21%) patients achieved a near-complete response. In the whole group, median recurrence-free survival was 19.4 months and median distant metastasis-free survival (mDMFS) was 21.9 months. In patients with a pathological complete response (pCR)/near-pCR median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were significantly longer than in patients with minor pathological response with hazard ratio (HR)=0.37 (p=.005) for RFS and HR=0.33 (p=.002) for DMFS. After median follow-up of 52.5 months, median progression-free survival since BRAFi/MEKi therapy initiation was 25.1 months. The median time-to-treatment-failure since initiation of neoadjuvant therapy was 22.2 months and was significantly longer in patients with pCR/near-pCR (HR=0.45; p=.022). Neoadjuvant therapy did not result in any new specific complications of surgery. After 48 months, RFS and overall survival were 36.3% and 64.8% or 20% and 37.4% in patients with pCR/near-pCR and pathological partial response/pathological nonresponse, respectively. The authors confirmed that BRAFi/MEKi combination is an effective and safe regimen in the perioperative treatment of stage III/IV melanoma. Major pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment is a surrogate marker of recurrence including DMFS in these patients. Our study presents a large comprehensive analysis of neoadjuvant-adjuvant systemic therapy in patients diagnosed with marginally resectable stage III or IV melanoma. Neoadjuvant therapy effectively reduced the volume of the disease, which facilitated subsequent surgical resection. After median follow-up of 52.5 months, median progression-free survival since therapy initiation was 25.1 months. Twelve patients had complete pathological response and 10 patients had a near-complete pathological response-and together they had median recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival significantly longer than in patients with pathological partial response or nonresponse. Complete/near-complete pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment is a surrogate marker of recurrence-free, including distant metastasis-free, survival in these patients.

Neoadjuvant Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Resectable Stage III Melanoma

BackgroundIn phase 1–2 trials in patients with resectable, macroscopic stage III melanoma, neoadjuvant immunotherapy was more efficacious than adjuvant immunotherapy.MethodsIn this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with resectable, macroscopic stage III melanoma to two cycles of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by surgery or surgery followed by 12 cycles of adjuvant nivolumab. Only patients in the neoadjuvant group with a partial response or nonresponse received adjuvant treatment. The primary end point was event-free survival.ResultsA total of 423 patients underwent randomization. At a median follow-up of 9.9 months, the estimated 12-month event-free survival was 83.7% (99.9% confidence interval [CI], 73.8 to 94.8) in the neoadjuvant group and 57.2% (99.9% CI, 45.1 to 72.7) in the adjuvant group. The difference in restricted mean survival time was 8.00 months (99.9% CI, 4.94 to 11.05; P<0.001; hazard ratio for progression, recurrence, or death, 0.32; 99.9% CI, 0.15 to 0.66). In the neoadjuvant group, 59.0% of patients had a major pathological response, 8.0% had a partial response, 26.4% had a nonresponse (>50% residual viable tumor), and 2.4% had progression; in 4.2%, surgery had not yet been performed or was omitted. The estimated 12-month recurrence-free survival was 95.1% in patients in the neoadjuvant group who had a major pathological response, 76.1% among those with a partial response, and 57.0% among those with a nonresponse. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher that were related to systemic treatment occurred in 29.7% of patients in the neoadjuvant group and in 14.7% in the adjuvant group.ConclusionsAmong patients with resectable, macroscopic stage III melanoma, neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by surgery and response-driven adjuvant therapy resulted in longer event-free survival than surgery followed by adjuvant nivolumab. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and others; NADINA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04949113.)

Final survival outcomes and exploratory biomarker analysis from the randomized, phase 2 neoSCORE trial: Two versus three cycles of neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

8048 Background: In the neoSCORE trial (NCT04459611), three cycles of neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy achieved a numerically higher major pathological response (MPR) rate compared to two cycles. However, the relationship between MPR and survival in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy is not currently fully elucidated. Furthermore, reliable predictive biomarkers are still lacking. Here, we report the survival and biomarker results of the study. Methods: Eligible patients with stage IB-IIIA resectable NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive either two or three cycles of neoadjuvant treatment with sintilimab (200mg) plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy (Q3W). After surgery, patients received totally four doses of perioperative immuno-chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the MPR rate. Secondary endpoints included the complete pathological response (pCR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, 2-year overall survival (OS) rate, and safety. Tumor samples (n = 19) were obtained for immune biomarker analysis via mass cytometry time of flight (CyTOF). Multiplexed immunofluorescence (mIF) was performed on FFPE tumor samples (n = 42). Results: At the data cutoff (15/1/2024), 55 patients received neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy and underwent surgical resection, with a median follow-up of 36.1 months. DFS (HR = 1.25, P= 0.595) and OS (HR = 0.88, P= 0.830) were similar between the two-cycle and three-cycle groups. The median DFS and OS were not reached in both groups. The 2-year DFS rate in the two-cycle and three-cycle groups were 76.9% and 65.5%, and the 2-year OS rates were 84.6% and 86.2%, respectively. In a multivariable Cox analysis including clinical characteristics, therapy, and pathological response, only MPR was significantly associated with longer DFS (HR = 0.32, P= 0.044). The AUC for the percentage of residual viable tumor in predicting DFS was 0.649 ( P= 0.061). CyTOF analysis demonstrated that increased infiltration of CD8+CD38+CD103- T cells after neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy was significantly associated with MPR ( P= 0.035). The mIF confirmed that patients achieving MPR showed higher frequencies of CD8+CD38+CD103- T cells than those without MPR ( P= 0.005). Additionally, patients with higher proportions of CD8+CD38+CD103- T cells had a trend towards improved DFS (HR = 0.39, P= 0.061) and OS (HR = 0.45, P= 0.259). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy was feasible and demonstrated a robust and persistent survival benefit in resectable NSCLC. MPR was associated with improved DFS. Increased CD8+CD38+CD103- T cells were associated with MPR, with a trend towards a better survival benefit, suggesting that it could be a promising predictive biomarker. Clinical trial information: NCT04459611 .