Major Pathologic Response Research Articles

Chemoradiotherapy and Subsequent Immunochemotherapy as Conversion Therapy in Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase II NEXUS-1 Trial.

This phase II trial investigated the safety and efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by immunochemotherapy (iCT) and surgery in unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC received radiotherapy (50 Gy/25f, 5 days/week) and nab-paclitaxel (100 mg on day 1/week) plus cisplatin (25 mg/m2 on day 1/week) for 5 weeks, followed by tislelizumab (200 mg on day 1/cycle) plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 2/cycle) for two 21-day cycles. Patients who converted to resectable underwent surgery 2 to 4 weeks afterward. The primary endpoint was a 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Thirty patients were enrolled and underwent CRT (median follow-up: 21 months), of whom 24 received iCT. Twenty (66.7%) patients achieved resectability (R0: 95.2%; pathologic complete response: 65.0%; major pathologic response: 90.0%). One-year PFS and overall survival (OS) rates were 79.4% and 89.6%, respectively. The R0 resection group exhibited longer PFS (median, not reached vs. 8.4 months; HR = 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.84; P = 0.02) and OS (median, not reached vs. 19.2 months; HR = 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.73; P < 0.01) than the nonsurgery group. Grade 3 to 4 adverse events were observed in 11 (11/30, 36.7%) patients, and immune-related pneumonitis was observed in 5 (5/24, 20.8%) patients. Post-CRT minimal residual disease before surgery was associated with unfavorable PFS and OS. Our study met the primary endpoint. Conversion CRT and subsequent iCT followed by surgery was a promising treatment strategy for unresectable locally advanced ESCC.

Racial/ethnic differences in survival and treatment response with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The optimal treatment for resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) remains under investigation, particularly about its effectiveness across different ethnicities. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the potential benefits of adding PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors for treatment, stratified by ethnicity. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors to treat patients with resectable NSCLC. The outcomes evaluated were disease-free survival/event-free survival (DFS/EFS), major pathological response (MPR), and pathological complete response (pCR). Hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for all endpoints using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. Statistical analyses were performed with R Software, version 4.2.3. A total of six RCTs comprising 3,827 patients with NSCLC were included. In populations of Asian descent, PD1/PD-L1 significantly improved DFS/EFS (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.44-0.78), MPR (RR 5.76; 95% CI 3.58-9.28), and pCR (RR 25.00; 95% CI 6.17-101.36). Similarly, patients of European ancestry experienced significantly improved DFS/EFS (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.65-0.90), MPR (RR 2.75; 95% CI 2.00-3.77), and pCR (RR 4.53; 95% CI 2.69-7.6) with PD1/PD-L1 therapy. Notably, patients with mixed ethnicity also demonstrated significant improvement in MPR (RR 4.05; 95% CI 2.60-6.33) and pCR (RR 8.44; 95% CI 3.75-19.00) when receiving PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors. This comprehensive meta-analysis suggests that incorporating PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors into treatments offers a promising benefit for patients with resectable NSCLC, regardless of ethnicity. Future studies with in-depth molecular characterization of patients can further refine these findings and potentially guide the development of personalized treatment strategies based on individual ethnic backgrounds.

SOX combined with tislelizumab and low-dose radiation therapy for the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase Ib/II clinical trial

BackgroundRecently, the clinical benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy have been observed in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer; however, the pathological complete response (pCR) and long-term survival rates are still unsatisfactory. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with tislelizumab and low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) for the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced G/GEJ cancer.MethodsThis is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase Ib/II trial. In the phase Ib study, 5 patients will be enrolled in each treatment group with different radiation doses. In the phase II study, a total of 44 patients will be enrolled. Eligible patients will be registered and receive three cycles of SOX regimen chemotherapy (S-1: 40-60 mg Bid, d1-14, q3w; oxaliplatin: 130 mg/m2, iv drip, d1, q3w) plus tislelizumab (200 mg, iv drip, d1, q3w). Simultaneously, LDRT will be planned and administered after the first cycle of systemic therapy. Radical D2 gastrectomy will be performed 4-6 weeks after the last administration of chemotherapy plus tislelizumab. The primary endpoint of phase Ib study is to determine the optimal radiation dose for phase II study. The primary endpoint of phase II is the pCR rate. The secondary endpoints include R0 resection rate, major pathological response (MPR) rate, 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rate, 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and safety profile. Moreover, we will also explore potential molecular markers for predicting the benefit and safety of this neoadjuvant regimen. Written informed consent should be provided by all patients enrolled in the study. The study protocol was approved by the independent ethics committee at each institution.DiscussionThis is the first study to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with tislelizumab and LDRT in G/GEJ cancer patients, the results of which may provide novel treatment strategy for patients with locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.Gov, identifier NCT06266871.

Neoadjuvant Atezolizumab in Patients With Surgically Resectable Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of administering three doses of neoadjuvant atezolizumab before curative surgical resection in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This single-arm phase II trial included patients with cSCC of the head and neck with stage III or IV disease, or stage II lesions for which standard therapy would incur an unacceptable morbidity. Patients received up to three doses of atezolizumab at a fixed dose of 1,200 mg every 21 days before undergoing surgical resection. The primary end point was the percentage of patients able to complete three doses of therapy and be eligible for surgical resection without discontinuation due to toxicity or progression. Secondary end points included unconfirmed RECIST 1.1 response rate, pathological response rate (major and complete pathological response), and safety and tolerability of atezolizumab. RESULTS Twenty patients were enrolled and treated. Sixteen (80%) of 20 patients completed three doses of atezolizumab, and all patients were eligible for surgical resection. A pathological complete response was seen in seven (35%; 95% CI, 15.4 to 59.2) patients, and a major pathological response (&lt;10% viable tumor) was seen in four (20%; 95% CI, 5.7 to 43.7) patients. RECIST responses were seen in eight (40%; 95% CI, 19.1 to 64.0) patients, and one (5%) patient progressed. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were seen in one (5%) patient who developed pneumonitis after the first dose of atezolizumab. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant atezolizumab is feasible and well tolerated in patients with advanced cSCC and results in a high rate of major and complete pathological responses.

Two-Year Outcomes and Biomarker Analysis of Locally Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy from the Phase II WuhanUHGI001 Trial.

This study reports the 2-year outcomes and biomarker analysis results of patients with locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy in a phase II WuhanUHGI001 trial. Eligible patients with cT3/4aN+M0 locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were screened, enrolled, and treated with 3 cycles of neoadjuvant tislelizumab and SOX followed by D2 gastrectomy and another 5 cycles of postoperative adjuvant SOX. The primary endpoint was major pathological response. Of the 49 included patients, 24 (49.0%) achieved major pathological response and 13 (26.5%) achieved pathological complete response. During a median follow-up of 26.8 months, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 69.4% and 81.2%, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in six patients (12.2%) during the neoadjuvant period, eight patients (17.0%) during the postoperative period, and seven patients (15.2%) during the adjuvant period. Biomarker analysis revealed that the pathological complete response showed no association with 2-year PFS and OS. Major pathological response showed a potentially strong association with improved 2-year PFS and OS rates. In addition, preoperative circulating tumor cells combined with pathological responses are helpful in prognosis assessment. In addition, our results showed that T downstaging, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, and CD3+ T cells were independent factors that affect PFS. The signet ring cell component (SRCC), T downstaging, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were independent factors affecting OS. Prognostic nomograms of PFS and OS constructed based on the multivariate Cox regression results demonstrated suitable calibration and discrimination ability. Neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus SOX exhibits promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in patients with locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. In addition, our study established a prognostic risk signature and nomograms based on clinicopathological characteristics, which can accurately predict patient outcomes and aid in personalized treatment planning.

Brief Report: Prognostic impact of adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy

ObjectiveThe potential survival benefits of adjuvant immunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, as well as the optimal number of adjuvant immunotherapy cycles, remain uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of adjuvant immunotherapy and determine the optimal number of cycles. MethodsA total of 438 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between August 2019 and June 2022 across four hospitals were enrolled in this study, with a median follow-up time of 31.3 months. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and tested by log-rank test. Unstratified Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to the subgroups. ResultsIn this multi-center cohort, 29.7% of patients (n=130) achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR). Patients who received adjuvant immunotherapy experienced significant survival benefits compared to those who did not (RFS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.98, P = 0.037; OS: HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13-0.57, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that patients with a squamous histologic type, positive PD-L1 expression, and those with a major pathologic response (MPR) particularly benefited from adjuvant immunotherapy. Additionally, we found that six cycles of adjuvant immunotherapy served as a threshold for better prognostic differentiation, suggesting that six or more cycles may be more beneficial. ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that the addition of adjuvant immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is significantly associated with improved RFS and OS in patients with resectable NSCLC. We also identified that six cycles of adjuvant immunotherapy may be the optimal regimen for these patients.

Neoadjuvant cadonilimab plus FLOT chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A multicenter, phase 2 study.

Treatment with cadonilimab and chemotherapy has shown promise as a first-line treatment for gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. However, its application in neoadjuvant settings has not yet been documented. This multicenter, phase 2 trial (ChiCTR2200066893) was conducted at four hospitals across China. Treatment-naive patients with locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma (cT3/4, N+, M0) and who were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative received 3-cycle or 4-cycle neoadjuvant treatment of cadonilimab plus FLOT (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) chemotherapy, followed by gastrectomy and 4-cycle adjuvant FLOT chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included major pathological response (MPR), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), R0 resection rate, downstaging rate, and safety. Between December 23, 2022, and December 15, 2023, 32 of 38 patients completed the scheduled treatment, achieving an R0 resection rate of 100% (32/32). The pCR rate was 21.1% (8/38, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7-32.4), and the MPR rate was 44.7% (17/38, 90% CI: 30.9-58.5). Radiological evaluations wereavailable for 28 of 38 patients by blinded independent central review. The ORR was 60.7% (17/28, 90% CI: 44.7-76.7), and the DCR was 100.0% (28/28, 90% CI: 100.0-100.0). Tumor downstaging occurred in 71.9% of patients (23/32), with consistent efficacy across all populations observed in the subgroup analysis. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 31.6% of patients without severe safety issues. Neoadjuvant cadonilimab plus FLOT chemotherapy treatment exhibits promising efficacy with manageable toxicities in locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, providing preliminary evidence for further investigation. This study was funded by Akeso Biopharma.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy vs targeted therapy plus chemotherapy in locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

To investigate the clinical efficacy, preservation of laryngeal function, and safety differences between PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy, and targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy in LA HPSCC patients. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with LA HPSCC treated at Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University from October, 2020 to March, 2024. A total of 110 eligible patients were included, 56 in the PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy group (Group A), and 54 in the targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy group (Group B). Relevant clinical data were collected, and the clinical efficacy, preservation of laryngeal function, complete response (CR) rate, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, major pathological response (MPR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of the two groups were analyzed and compared. In both groups A and B, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were similar with no significant differences, but the pCR rate in Group A was much higher than that in Group B, at 37.5% and 7.4%, respectively (p<0.001). The rate of primary tumor downstaging in group A was much higher than that in group B (76.8% vs. 38.9%) as well (p<0.0001). In addition, the 1y-OS rate in group A was 95.7%, compared to 87.0% in group B (p=0.106, HR=0.34; 95% CI: 0.114-1.013), and the 1y-PFS rate was 89.4% in group A compared to 85.2% in group B (p=0.399, HR=0.675; 95% CI: 0.275-1.659). Furthermore, the larynx function preservation rate was significantly higher in group A at 85.7%, compared to that of group B at only 66.7% (p=0.019). There were no deaths due to TRAEs in either group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 TRAEs between the two groups either (p=0.77). The main TRAEs in Group A were metabolism and nutrition disorders (52/56, 92.9%) and, in Group B were blood and lymphatic system disorders (40/54, 74.1%). PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy showed better short-term efficacy compared to targeted therapy. Additionally, a trend toward improved long-term survival was observed with PD-1 inhibitors but not with targeted therapy. Results for both groups indicate that neoadjuvant therapy is both safe and manageable.

Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy with Nivolumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Background: Lung cancer is among the most prevalent and serious forms of cancer, characterized by an allogenic phenotype that presents significant therapeutic challenges. Materials and Methods: We analyzed medical records from January 2022 to August 2023, focusing on individuals aged 18 and older diagnosed with resectable NSCLC who received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy prior to surgical intervention. Results: The cohort comprised 56 patients, predominantly smokers (95%) and male (74%), with 80% presenting the disease at stage III. Of the participants, 44 underwent surgery, with 95% receiving lobar resection. Clinical assessments via PET-CT imaging revealed an 86% rate of response or disease stabilization, while pathological evaluations showed complete and major pathological responses in 61% of cases. Conclusions: This real-world data supports the safety and efficacy of incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors in the neoadjuvant treatment of NSCLC, followed by surgical resection.

Perioperative Tislelizumab plus intensity modulated radiotherapy in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: a phase II trial

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with macrovascular invasion (MVI) have dismal prognosis and there are no standard perioperative therapies. This phase 2 trial (ChiCTR2000036385) aimed to investigate the activity and safety of perioperative tislelizumab plus intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for resectable HCC with MVI. Thirty treatment-naïve patients with MVI received 3 cycles of tislelizumab intravenously (200 mg, every three weeks) and concurrent IMRT (45 Gray in 15 fractions). Primary endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with a complete or major pathological response (pCR or MPR), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and safety. Of patients enrolled, 15 (50%) underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant tislelizumab. The ORR was 30.0% (90% CI 16.6%-46.5%) and the median OS was 18.7 months. Of the 15 patients underwent surgical resection, 10 (66.7%) achieved pCR or MPR and 8 (53.3%) remained recurrence-free. The median RFS were not reached with a median follow-up of 21.77 months (95% CI 12.50-31.03) post-surgery. 4 (13.3%) patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. The most common events were thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and anemia. The trial has met the pre-specified endpoints, and these results support further studies of perioperative immunotherapy plus radiotherapy in HCC.

Perioperative sintilimab and neoadjuvant anlotinib plus chemotherapy for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial (TD-NeoFOUR trial)

This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with anlotinib and chemotherapy, followed by adjuvant sintilimab, for resectable NSCLC. Forty-five patients received anlotinib (10 mg, QD, PO, days 1–14), sintilimab (200 mg, day 1), and platinum-based chemotherapy of each three-week cycle for 3 cycles, followed by surgery within 4–6 weeks. Adjuvant sintilimab (200 mg) was administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was achieving a pathological complete response (pCR). From June 10, 2021 through October 10, 2023, 45 patients were enrolled and composed the intention-to-treat population. Twenty-six patients (57.8%) achieved pCR, and 30 (66.7%) achieved major pathological response (MPR). Forty-one patients underwent surgery. In the per-protocol set (PP set), 63.4% (26/41) achieved pCR, and 73.2% achieved MPR. The median event-free survival was not attained (95% CI, 25.1-NE). During the neoadjuvant treatment phase, grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 25 patients (55.6%), while immune-related adverse events were reported in 7 patients (15.6%). We assessed vascular normalization and infiltration of immune-related cells by detecting the expression of relevant cell markers in NSCLC tissues with mIHC. Significant tumor microenvironment changes were observed in pCR patients, including reduced VEGF+ cells and CD4+Foxp3+ Treg cells, and increased perivascular CD4+ T cells, CD39+CD8+ T cells, and M1 macrophages. In conclusion, perioperative sintilimab and neoadjuvant anlotinib plus chemotherapy achieved pCR in a notable proportion of patients with resectable NSCLC and were associated with profound changes in the tumour microenvironment (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05400070).

Efficacy, Safety, and Influence on Tumor Microenvironment of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab plus Ramucirumab for PD-L1 Positive NSCLC: A Phase 2 Trial (EAST ENERGY).

Angiogenesis inhibitors are known to modify tumor immunity. Combination of angiogenesis inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has shown efficacy against many types of cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated the feasibility of neoadjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab and ramucirumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-2 antagonist for patients with PD-L1-positive NSCLC and its influence on the tumor microenvironment (TME). Patients with pathologically proven NSCLC with PD-L1-positive, clinical stage IB-IIIA were eligible. Patients received two cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg/body) and ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) every three weeks. Surgery was scheduled 4 to 8 weeks after the last dose. The primary endpoint was the major pathologic response (MPR) rate by a blinded independent pathology review. The sample size was 24 patients. Exploratory endpoints were evaluated to elucidate the effects of neoadjuvant therapy on TME. The 24 eligible patients were enrolled between July 2019 and April 2022. The MPR rate was 50.0% (90% confidence interval, 31.9-68.1%). Six patients showed pathological complete response. Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 9 patients (37.5%), including 3 immune-related AEs (acute tubulointerstitial nephritis in 2 cases and polymyalgia rheumatica in one). There were no grade 4 or 5 AEs. The transcriptome and multiplexed immunohistochemistry results suggested that tumors with greater CD8+ T-cell infiltration and higher expression of effector molecules at the baseline could show better sensitivity to treatment. This new neoadjuvant combination of pembrolizumab plus ramucirumab was feasible and anti-VEGF agents may enhance the effects of ICIs.

Comparison of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study with 3-year survival analysis

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nCIT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) has shown short-term benefits, but long-term survival outcomes are unclear. This study compares nCIT and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) in resectable ESCC.Patients and methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on ESCC patients who underwent nCT or nCIT followed by esophagectomy. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper of 0.02 was employed to minimize bias. The primary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 131 comparable pairs of ESCC patients receiving nCT and nCIT were selected for the final analysis. The nCIT had higher rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (mPR) compared to nCT. Additionally, nCIT led to significant tumor down-staging, higher rates of R0 resection, and increased lymph node clearance during surgery. Patients who received nCIT exhibited improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at the 3-year follow-up. The incidence of distant and mixed relapses was lower in the nCIT group compared to the nCT group. However, the risk of locoregional relapse was comparable between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed that the benefits of nCIT were generally observed across most patient subgroups. Interestingly, in patients without pCR or mPR, nCIT still demonstrated better survival benefits than nCT.ConclusionnCIT demonstrated superior pathological response rates and improved 3-year DFS and OS compared to nCT alone in locally advanced ESCC, but long-term survival validation is needed.

Impact of select actionable genomic alterations on efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundNeoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival outcomes compared with chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the impact of actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) on the efficacy...

Tissue and Imaging Biomarkers of Response to Neoadjuvant Nivolumab or Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Patients with Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction: Perioperative immunotherapy has shown promise in some patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study examined tissue and imaging biomarkers associated with pathologic response in a phase II clinical trial in patients with resectable HCC. Methods: Analysis included 18 patients with biopsy-proven resectable HCC treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in a phase II clinical trial at MD Anderson Cancer Center (NCT03222076). Liver MRE (to measure tissue fibrosis) and biopsies (to evaluate immune activation markers) were obtained serially pretreatment and after completing neoadjuvant immunotherapy. A major pathologic response (MPR) was defined as tumor necrosis of more than 70%. Data comparing patients with MPR versus those without were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: Patients with MPR after neoadjuvant immunotherapy tended to have larger tumors (mean 9.52 vs. 4.99 centimeters; p = 0.050). They had a significant reduction in tumor size posttreatment (14.67% reduction vs. 9.15% increase in size; p = 0.042) and a nonsignificant decrease in serum AFP (−24.20% vs. −14.00%; p = 0.085). Further, patients with MPR had a greater increase in intratumoral expression levels of CD8 (26.92% vs. −0.04%; p = 0.026), granzyme B (15.56% vs. −2.24%; p = 0.011), and PD-1 (20.17% vs. 0.40%; p = 0.048) but not PD-L1 (7.69% vs. 0.57%; p = 0.26). For imaging biomarkers, tumor and liver fibrosis were comparable before and after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with MPR versus nonresponders. Conclusion: Changes in tumor size, immune cell infiltration, and immune cell activation are candidate predictive markers of pathologic response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable HCC.

Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy Followed by Sleeve Lobectomy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This study was carried out to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on long-term survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing sleeve lobectomy. A total of 613 patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 124 who received neoadjuvant therapy. A 1:2 Propensity score matching (PSM) method was adopted to create a balanced cohort including 110 with neoadjuvant therapy and 169 without neoadjuvant therapy. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with improved 3-year DFS (73.6% vs. 54.4%, P<0.001) and OS (80.9% vs. 63.9%, P=0.002) compared to patients without neoadjuvant therapy. Moreover, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy significantly improved 3-year DFS (85.3% vs. 54.4%, P=0.001) and OS (88.2% vs. 63.9%, P=0.006), whereas chemotherapy alone did not show a significant effect. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that neoadjuvant therapy was an independent predictor of improved DFS and OS while pathological N2 stage was independently associated with poorer DFS and OS. Furthermore, subgroup analysis in the neoadjuvant arm revealed that pathological N2 stage was an independent risk factor for DFS (HR, 3.830; 95% CI, 1.687-8.694; P=0.001), and achieving major pathologic response (MPR) was an independent predictor for better OS (HR, 0.120; 95% CI, 0.015-0.933; P=0.043). Neoadjuvant therapy prior to sleeve lobectomy significantly increased DFS and OS in locally advanced NSCLC. Sleeve lobectomy is advisable followed by neoadjuvant therapy, especially with chemoimmunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant intratumoral plasmid interleukin-12 electro-gene-transfer and nivolumab in patients with operable locoregionally advanced melanoma.

Intratumoral (IT) TAVO-EP (tavokinogene telseplasmid delivered by electroporation) results in localized expression of interleukin-12 (IL-12) within the tumor microenvironment (TME). This study evaluated neoadjuvant TAVO-EP combined with intravenous (IV) nivolumab followed by surgery and adjuvant nivolumab in patients with operable locoregionally advanced melanoma. The neoadjuvant phase comprised up to 3 Χ 4-week cycles where TAVO-EP was given IT on days 1, 8, and 15 (optional) concurrently with 480 mg nivolumab IV on day 8 of each 4-week cycle. Surgery followed, and adjuvant nivolumab was initiated after surgery. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints included major pathological response (MPR; pCR or near pCR). Sixteen patients were enrolled and the preoperative radiological response rate was 63%. One patient declined surgery after experiencing a significant clinical response. Among the remaining 15 patients, pCR rate was 60% and MPR was 80%. No patient with MPR has had disease recurrence with a median follow-up from the date of surgery of 15.4 months. At baseline, most patients exhibited low CD8+ TIL, PD-L1 and IFN-γ gene expression signature. There was enhanced immune activation following treatment in the TME and blood including increased immune-related gene expression, CD8+ TIL and proliferating immune cell subsets. The clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant IT TAVO-EP + nivolumab is promising with 80% of patients achieving an MPR. Evidence of potent immune activation both systemically and within the TME along with a favorable safety profile supports the activity of local IL-12 and anti-PD1 based regimens.

First in human intraarterial delivery of tislelizumab for the treatment of pMMR locally advanced rectal cancer: A single-arm, open label, phase II clinical trial

BackgroundIntravenous immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in treating locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), but concerns about systemic toxicity persist. This study developed a unique approach termed chemo-immuno-embolization with transcatheter rectal arterial intervention (CIETAI), aiming to enhance the anti-tumor response while minimizing systemic toxicity. MethodThis is a prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical trial conducted in Daping hospital. Patients with previously untreated stage II/III LARC underwent preoperative CIETAI combined with PD-1 inhibitor tislelizumab plus oxaliplatin, followed by standard concomitant chemoradiotherapy (capecitabine and 50.4 Gy radiation). Intravenous tislelizumab was administered for an additional two cycles. ResultsBetween January 2023 and December 2023, a total of 38 patients were enrolled. As the primary endpoint, 17 (44.74 %) patients achieved pathological complete response (TRG0), with a major pathologic response (MPR) rate of 65.79 %. The anal preservation rate was 84.21 % (32/38), and importantly, 15 of 21 patients with low rectal cancer achieved organ preservation with functional maintenance. Eight patients experienced grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs). All immune-related AEs were grade 1–2, with the most common being endocrine toxicity (5/6, 83.33 %). No grade 5 AEs occurred. ConclusionThis study provides preliminary evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of intraarterial tislelizumab delivery in the neoadjuvant setting for LARC. These promising results encourage further exploration in larger cohorts to validate the clinical impact of this novel CIETAI strategy. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05957016.

Improved Event-Free Survival After Complete or Major Pathologic Response in Patients With Resectable NSCLC Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy Regardless of Adjuvant Treatment: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

IntroductionNeoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has reshaped the treatment landscape for resectable NSCLC, yet the prognostic significance of pathologic response remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) or major pathologic response (MPR) on event-free survival (EFS) and assessed the influence of adjuvant immunotherapy. MethodsWe performed an IPD meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials on neoadjuvant or perioperative anti–programmed death-ligand 1 in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. The IPD was extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves for pCR and/or MPR from the included studies. Survival outcomes were compared between patients achieving pCR or MPR and those who did not, considering both intention-to-treat and resected populations. ResultsAchieving pCR or MPR was associated with improved EFS in the intention-to-treat population (pCR, hazard ratio = 0.13; MPR, hazard ratio = 0.18, respectively) with a 24 months EFS rate of 94% and 88% for patients who achieved pCR and MPR, respectively. Independently from pCR status, patients who were treated in an experimental arm that included adjuvant immunotherapy had similar EFS. ConclusionsOur study reported a strong EFS improvement in patients who achieved either pCR or MPR after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The use of adjuvant immunotherapy after tumor resection was not associated with improved EFS.

Pathological response following neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a cross-trial, patient-level analysis

Neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before liver resection results in pathological tumour regression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to describe the characteristics of pathological responses after preoperative ICI therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma and to evaluate the association between the depth of tumour regression and relapse-free survival. In this cross-trial, patient-level analysis, we performed a pooled analysis of data from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving ICI therapy before liver resection as part of a global collaborative consortium (NeoHCC) of five phase 1 and 2 clinical trials and standardised observational protocols conducted in 12 tertiary referral centres across the USA, UK, and Taiwan. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma by tissue core biopsy before treatment initiation, a Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System score of 5 on imaging, or both, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, and no extrahepatic spread or previous ICI treatment. Pathological response was measured as the percentage of non-viable tumour in the resected surgical specimen, with major pathological response corresponding to at least 70% tumour regression and pathological complete response corresponding to 100% tumour regression. We correlated pathological response with radiological overall response using RECIST criteria (version 1.1) and relapse-free survival, and evaluated the threshold of tumour regression that could be optimally associated with relapse-free survival. At data cutoff on Jan 31, 2024, 111 patients were included in the study, of whom data on pathological response were available for 104 (94%) patients. Patients received treatment from Oct 5, 2017, to Nov 15, 2023, mostly ICI combinations (76 [69%]), for a median of 1·4 months (IQR 0·7-2·9). 87 (78%) patients were men and 24 (22%) were women. Most patients had underlying viral chronic liver disease (73 [66%]) and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A hepatocellular carcinoma (61 [55%]), without portal vein thrombosis (87 [78%]). We observed major pathological response in 33 (32%) patients and pathological complete response in 19 (18%) patients. Radiological overall response was associated with major pathological response, with 23 (74%) of 31 patients with radiological response showing major pathological response compared with ten (14%) of 73 patients without radiological response (p<0·0001). However, ten (30%) of 33 major pathological responses were not predicted by radiological response. After a median follow-up of 27·2 months (95% CI 22·3-32·1), median relapse-free survival for the whole cohort was 43·6 months (95% CI 28·3-not evaluable). Relapse-free survival was significantly longer in patients with major pathological response than in those who did not have a major pathological response (not reached [95% CI not evaluable-not evaluable] vs 28·3 months [12·8-43·8]; hazard ratio 0·26 [0·10-0·66]; p=0·0024) and in patients with pathological complete response than in those who did not have a pathological complete response (NR [95% CI not evaluable-not evaluable] vs 32·8 months [15·0-50·5]; 0·19 [0·05-0·78]; p=0·010). Unbiased recursive partitioning of the cohort for the risk of relapse, death, or both identified a threshold of 90% as the optimal cutoff of pathological tumour regression to predict improved relapse-free survival. The extent of tumour regression following neoadjuvant ICI therapy could identify patients with improved relapse-free survival following liver resection. The threshold of at least 90% tumour regression should be validated for its surrogate role for relapse-free survival in phase 3 randomised controlled trials. None.