Major Liver Resection Research Articles

Hospital variation and outcomes after repeat hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a nationwide cohort study

BackgroundApproximately 70% of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) experiences intrahepatic recurrence after initial liver resection. This study assessed outcomes and hospital variation in repeat liver resections (R-LR). MethodsThis population-based study included all patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM between 2014 and 2022 in the Netherlands. Overall survival (OS) was collected for patients operated on between 2014 and 2018 by linkage to the insurance database. ResultsData of 7479 liver resections (1391 (18.6%) repeat and 6088 (81.4%) primary) were analysed. Major morbidity and mortality were not different. Factors associated with major morbidity included ASA 3+, major liver resection, extrahepatic disease, and open surgery. Five-year OS after repeat versus primary liver resection was 42.3% versus 44.8%, P = 0.37. Factors associated with worse OS included largest CRLM >5 cm (aHR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.07–2.34, P = 0.023), >3 CRLM (aHR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.00–1.75, P = 0.046), extrahepatic disease (aHR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.25–2.04, P = 0.001), positive tumour margins (aHR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.09–1.85, P = 0.009). Significant hospital variation in performance of R-LR was observed, median 18.9% (8.2% to 33.3%). ConclusionSignificant hospital variation was observed in performance of R-LR in the Netherlands reflecting different treatment decisions upon recurrence. On a population-based level R-LR leads to satisfactory survival.

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic extended hepatectomy versus major hepatectomy: a single-center experience

IntroductionLaparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) remains restricted to a few specialized centers and poses a challenge to surgeons performing laparoscopic resections. Laparoscopic extended resections are even more complex and rarely conducted. MethodsFrom a single-institution database, we compared the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent major and extended laparoscopic resections, stratifying the entire retrospective cohort into four groups: right hepatectomy, left hepatectomy, right extended hepatectomy, and left extended hepatectomy. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, operative variables, and especially postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Results250 patients underwent major and extended laparoscopic liver resections, including 160 right, 31 right extended, 36 left, and 23 left extended laparoscopic hepatectomies. The most common indication for resection was colorectal liver metastases (64%). Laparoscopic extended hepatectomy (LEH) showed significantly longer operative time, more blood loss, need for Pringle maneuver, conversion to open surgery, higher rates of liver failure, postoperative ascites, and intra-abdominal hemorrhage, R1 margins and length of stay when compared with the LMH group. Mortality rates were similar between groups. Multivariate analysis revealed intraoperative blood transfusion (OR = 5.1[CI-95%: 1.15–6.79]; p = 0.02) as an independent predictor for major complications. ConclusionsLEH showed to be feasible, however with higher blood loss and significantly associated to major complications.

Primary neuroendocrine tumor of the liver

Neuroendocrine tumors generally originate in the digestive tract or pancreas, developing liver metastases throughout their evolution. The presence of a primary neuroendocrine tumor of the liver is still controversial and there are very few cases. We present a case of a primary neuroendocrine tumor of the liver confirmed by anatomo-pathological study and images. The patient underwent two major liver resections, lastly preserving only segment IV.

The risk factors for perioperative blood transfusion in open liver resection, a retrospective cohort study

Purpose: Liver resection is the current treatment for hepatic neoplasms but may be associated with intraoperative hemorrhage and the need for blood transfusions. The aim of this study is to identify the risk factors for predicting the requirement of a perioperative blood transfusion in open liver resection. Methods: A total of 808 consecutive patients who had undergone elective open liver resection from 2006 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed using the database. Baseline characteristics and intra-operative data were collected. Perioperative blood transfusion was defined as the transfusion of allogenic packed red cells during surgery and the 48 hours following surgery. An analysis of logistic regression was used to determine the independent risk factors for blood transfusion in open liver resection. Results: Three hundred and seventy-seven patients (46.7%) received perioperative packed red cell transfusions. The independent risk factors associated with perioperative blood transfusion included ASA classification>2, preoperative anemia (Hb<12 g/dL for women, Hb<13 g/dL for men), thrombocytopenia (platelet count<100×103/mm3), albumin<3.5 g/dL, largest tumor size>4 cm., major liver resection, and surgeon experience performing<50 cases of major open liver resection. Conclusion: Preoperative risk factors may be utilized to assess and predict patients who require perioperative blood transfusions following liver resection. Modifiable risk factors may also be treated prior to surgery. Furthermore, patient blood management and methods to minimize blood loss and blood transfusions during surgery should be implemented in patients who require high-risk transfusions.

Experts vs. machine – comparison of machine learning to expert-informed prediction of outcome after major liver surgery

BackgroundMachine learning (ML) has been successfully implemented for classification tasks (e.g., cancer diagnosis). ML performance for more challenging predictions is largely unexplored. This study's objective was to compare machine learning vs. expert-informed predictions for surgical outcome in patients undergoing major liver surgery. MethodsSingle tertiary center data on preoperative parameters and postoperative complications for elective hepatic surgery patients were included (2008–2021). Expert-informed prediction models were established on 14 parameters identified by two expert liver surgeons to impact on postoperative outcome. ML models used all available preoperative patient variables (n = 62). Model performance was compared for predicting 3-month postoperative overall morbidity. Temporal validation and additional analysis in major liver resection patients were conducted. Results889 patients included. Expert-informed models showed low average bias (2–5 CCI points) with high over/underprediction. ML models performed similarly: average prediction 5–10 points higher than observed CCI values with high variability (95% CI −30 to 50). No performance improvement for major liver surgery patients. ConclusionNo clinical relevance in the application of ML for predicting postoperative overall morbidity was found. Despite being a novel hype, ML has the potential for application in clinical practice. However, at this stage it does not replace established approaches of prediction modelling.

European fellowship training opportunities for hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: an international survey of fellows and program directors

BackgroundThere are no established training pathways for hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery in Europe. This study aims to overview the current status of fellowship training from both fellows' and institutions' perspectives. MethodsA web-based snapshot survey was distributed to all members of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) to reach for former fellows and program directors of European HPB surgery fellowships held between 2013 and 2023. ResultsA total of 37 fellows and 13 program directors replied describing 32 different programs in 13 European countries. The median (range) age at fellowship start was 34 (30–45 years). Fellowship duration was most commonly one (36 %) or two (40 %) years. Fellowships were funded in 70 % and fellows were required to learn a new language in 27 %. Most fellows performed between none and 10 pancreatic (68 %), major (67 %) and minor (60 %) liver resections as 1st surgeon, while the number of operations performed as 1st assistant were more heterogeneous. Program directors estimated a higher number of operations performed by fellows as first surgeons. The percentage of procedures performed minimally invasively did not exceed 10 %. ConclusionThere is substantial heterogeneity between HPB fellowship programs in Europe. A wider standardization of clinical curriculum, including minimally invasive surgery, is desirable.

Predictive Value of Preoperative ICG-R15 Testing in Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure Following Major Liver Resection: Indian Experience.

Surgical resection stands as the preeminent therapeutic approach for both primary hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic liver malignancies. Its efficacy is contingent upon the attainment of a comprehensive excision while ensuring a sufficient future liver remnant (FLR). However, post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains a significant challenge, particularly in patients with preexisting liver disease. The present study aims to investigate the predictive value of the preoperative indocyanine green retention test at 15min (ICG-R15) in identifying patients at risk of PHLF following major liver resection. This retrospective review focused on patients who underwent the ICG-R15 test before major liver resection between August 2021 and January 2023. All patients underwent standard preoperative evaluation and staging. Patients with primary or metastatic liver cancer planned for major resection and undergoing ICG-R15 were included in the study. Patients with elevated serum bilirubin (> 3mg/dl) and those not undergoing liver resection or minor liver resection (< 3 segments) were excluded from the study. PHLF was defined by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) criteria. Follow-up was performed to identify 90-day morbidity. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, we confirmed independent risk parameters that predicted postoperative major complications and severe PHLF. The study included 72 patients who underwent preoperative ICG-R15 testing prior to major liver resection. PHLF occurred in 28 patients (38.9%), with 24 patients (33.3%) classified as severity score B and 3 patients (4.16%) had severity score C. Univariate analysis revealed future liver remnant (FLR), ICG-R15, and blood transfusion as predictors of PHLF. Multivariate analysis confirmed FLR (p = 0.019) and ICG-R15 (p = 0.032) as significant predictors. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.642 for ICG-R15 in predicting PHLF. An optimal cut-point of 7.5 was determined. Our study highlights the importance of preoperative risk assessment of liver function evaluation using the ICG-R15 test, to predict the risk of PHLF following liver resection. Implementing appropriate interventions, especially in patients with borderline FLR, can improve surgical outcomes and enhance patient safety. Further research and prospective studies are essential to refine risk prediction models and improve rates of PHLF after liver resections.

Perioperative LiMAx Test Analysis: Impact of Portal Vein Embolisation, Chemotherapy and Major Liver Resection.

Postoperative liver failure (PLF) is a severe complication after major liver resection (MLR). To increase the safety of patients, clinical bedside tests are of great importance. However, limitations of their applicability and validity impair their value. Preoperative measurements of the liver maximum capacity (LiMAx) were performed in n = 40 patients, who underwent MLR (≥3 segments). Matched postoperative LiMAx was measured in n = 21 patients. Liver function was compared between pretreated patients (n = 11 with portal vein embolisation (PVE) and n = 19 patients with preoperative chemotherapy) and therapy naïve patients. The LiMAx values were compared with liver-specific blood parameters and volumetric analysis. In total, n = 40 patients were enrolled in this study. The majority of patients (n = 33; 82.5%) had high preoperative LiMAx values (>315 µg/kg/h), while only seven patients (17.5%) had medium values (140-315 µg/kg/h), and none of the patients had low values (<140 µg/kg/h). A comparison of pretreated patients (with PVE and/or chemotherapy) and therapy naïve patients showed no significant difference in the preoperative LiMAx values (p > 0.05). The preoperative LiMAx values were significantly higher than the matched postoperative values on postoperative day 1 (p < 0.0001). A comparison between the expected and measured postoperative LiMAx showed a difference (≥10%) in 7 out of 13 patients (53.8%). After an initial postoperative decrease in the LiMAx, the patients without complications (n = 12) showed a continuous increase until 14 days after surgery. In the patients with postoperative complications, a decrease in the LiMAx was associated with a prolonged recovery. For patients undergoing MLR within the 0.5% rule, which is the clinical gold standard, the LiMAx values do not offer any additional information. Additionally, the LiMAx may have reflected liver function, but it did not deliver additional information regarding postoperative liver recovery. The clinical use of LiMAx might be relevant in selected patients beyond the 0.5% rule.

Impact of tumor size on the outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study

BackgroundTo evaluate the impact of tumor size on the perioperative and long-term outcomes of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsWe reviewed the patients’ data who underwent liver resection for HCC between November 2009 and 2019. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the tumor size. Group I: HCC < 5 cm, Group II: HCC between 5 to 10 cm, and Group III: HCC ≥ 10 cm in size.ResultsThree hundred fifteen patients were included in the current study. Lower platelets count was noted Groups I and II. Higher serum alpha-feto protein was noted in Group III. Higher incidence of multiple tumors, macroscopic portal vein invasion, nearby organ invasion and presence of porta-hepatis lymph nodes were found in Group III. More major liver resections were performed in Group III. Longer operation time, more blood loss and more transfusion requirements were found in Group III. Longer hospital stay and more postoperative morbidities were noted in Group III, especially posthepatectomy liver failure, and respiratory complications.The median follow-up duration was 17 months (7–110 months). Mortality occurred in 100 patients (31.7%) and recurrence occurred in 147 patients (46.7%). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding recurrence free survival (Log Rank, p = 0.089) but not for overall survival (Log Rank, p = 0.001).ConclusionHCC size is not a contraindication for liver resection. With proper selection, safe techniques and standardized care, adequate outcomes could be achieved.

Major Liver resection in Peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma without pre-operative biliary drainage - A Prospective study

Major Liver resection in Peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma without pre-operative biliary drainage - A Prospective study

Advancing treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: role of hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy in small-volume centers.

Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy (HPD) is a controversial surgical technique for the treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. This study aimed to clarify the mortality, morbidity, and survival outcomes in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent HPD at a small-volume hepatobiliary-pancreatic center. This retrospective study included 78 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent HPD (n = 18) or major liver resection with bile duct resection (n = 60) at our center between October 2013 and December 2022. The primary endpoints were the in-hospital morbidity and 90-day mortality rates. The secondary endpoints included the recurrence-free and overall survival rates in both groups. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) were more common in the HPD group (Group 1, 61.1%) than in the major liver resection group (Group 2; 23.3%, p = 0.03). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates for Groups 1 and 2 were 66.7%, 41.7%, and 27.8% and 79.9%, 44.5%, and 22.7%, respectively (p = 0.89). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for Groups 1 and 2 were 64.2%, 53.5%, and 35.6% and 85.3%, 46.8%, and 25.0%, respectively (p = 0.41). Although morbidity and mortality after HPD are higher than those after other surgeries, our findings suggest that HPD is a feasible treatment option for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, even in small-volume centers. However, meticulous pre- and perioperative evaluation of the patient's overall health status, quality of life, and prospective advantages are required.

One Hundred Major Liver Resections: Outcome from Developing HPB Unit

One Hundred Major Liver Resections: Outcome from Developing HPB Unit

Preoperative sarcopenia at the T4 vertebral level predicts postoperative major complications in patients undergoing major liver resection for colorectal metastases

Preoperative sarcopenia at the T4 vertebral level predicts postoperative major complications in patients undergoing major liver resection for colorectal metastases

Assessment of liver function by gadoxetic acid avidity in MRI in a model of rapid liver regeneration in rats

BackgroundThis animal study investigates the hypothesis of an immature liver growth following ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) by measuring liver volume and function using gadoxetic acid avidity in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in models of ALPPS, major liver resection (LR) and portal vein ligation (PVL). MethodsWistar rats were randomly allocated to ALPPS, LR or PVL. In contrast-enhanced MRI scans with gadoxetic acid (Primovist®), liver volume and function of the right median lobe (=future liver remnant, FLR) and the deportalized lobes (DPL) were assessed until post-operative day (POD) 5. Liver functionFLR/DPL was defined as the inverse value of time from injection of gadoxetic acid to the blood pool-corrected maximum signal intensityFLR/DPL multiplied by the volumeFLR/DPL. ResultsIn ALPPS (n = 6), LR (n = 6) and PVL (n = 6), volumeFLR and functionFLR increased proportionally, except on POD 1. Thereafter, functionFLR exceeded volumeFLR increase in LR and ALPPS, but not in PVL. Total liver function was significantly reduced after LR until POD 3, but never undercuts 60% of its pre-operative value following ALPPS and PVL. DiscussionThis study shows for the first time that functional increase is proportional to volume increase in ALPPS using gadoxetic acid avidity in MRI.

Right hepatectomy with thrombectomy in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: A case report

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) attacks the intrahepatic vasculature, particularly the portal vein. One of the most important criteria for a poor prognosis in individuals with HCC is the presence of portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT). There is no global consensus or standard guidelines on the management of HCC with PVTT. We present a 48-year-old male manual labourer with a mass in the right hypochondriac region associated with dull, aching pain for four months. His preoperative preparation, involved addressing and rectifying any existing deficits. Standard precautions were taken for a major liver resection, specifically a right hepatectomy with the removal of a blood clot from the right portal vein. Postoperatively, the patient was mobilized on the first day, engaged in respiratory exercises, and received preventive measures against deep vein thrombosis. We have successfully performed a right hepatectomy with thrombectomy for HCC right lobe with PVTT, which showed a better outcome for the patient. He was leading a normal life at 14-day and 45-day follow-up visits.

ASO Author Reflections: Cirrhosis and Severity of Cirrhosis Negatively Affects the Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Major Liver Resections for Primary Liver Malignancies.

ASO Author Reflections: Cirrhosis and Severity of Cirrhosis Negatively Affects the Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Major Liver Resections for Primary Liver Malignancies.

ASO Visual Abstract: The Influence of Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis on Postoperative Outcomes After Major Liver Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

ASO Visual Abstract: The Influence of Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis on Postoperative Outcomes After Major Liver Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Evaluation of perioperative routine coagulation testing versus thromboelastography for major liver resection - A single-arm, prospective, interventional trial (PORTAL trial).

The International Normalised Ratio (INR), which assesses the loss of procoagulant factors in the extrinsic pathway, fails to evaluate the coagulation abnormalities comprehensively after a major liver resection, which often leads to reduced synthesis of procoagulant and anticoagulant-factors. This study was conducted with an aim to study the trend and compare the results of routine coagulation tests and thromboelastography (TEG) during the perioperative period in patients undergoing major liver resections (≥3 segments). Twenty-five patients who underwent a major liver resection were enrolled. This prospective, single-arm, interventional study was performed with the primary objective of determining the serial changes in conventional coagulation tests and TEG during the perioperative period in patients undergoing major liver resections, at the preincision period, intraoperative period, postoperatively, at 48 h and on the fifth postoperative day. Transfusion requirements of blood components were also assessed with a TEG-guided replacement strategy. Spearman rank-order correlation was used to study the relationships of coagulation tests (both TEG and conventional tests) at each time point. The prothrombin time (PT)-INR was elevated in 14 patients (56%) at the intraoperative, immediate postoperative and 48-h time points in contrast to the TEG parameters, which remained normal in all patients. Blood component transfusion was avoided in 4, 11 and 10 patients at the intraoperative, immediate postoperative and 48-h time points, respectively. International Normalised Ratio overestimates the coagulopathy in patients undergoing major liver resection, and a thromboelastography-guided transfusion strategy reduces overall transfusion requirements.

Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia and surgical site infections after liver resection

BackgroundIn the overall surgical population, inadvertent perioperative hypothermia has been associated with an increased incidence of surgical site infection (SSI). However, recent clinical trials did not validate this notion. This study aimed to investigate the potential correlation between inadvertent perioperative hypothermia and SSIs following liver resection. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included all consecutive patients who underwent liver resection between January 2019 and December 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Perioperative temperature managements were implemented for all patients included in the analysis. Estimated propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the baseline imbalances between the normothermia and hypothermia groups. Before and after PSM, univariate analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation between hypothermia and SSI. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine whether hypothermia was an independent risk factor for postoperative transfusion and major complications. Subgroup analyses were performed for diabetes mellitus, age > 65 years, and major liver resection. ResultsAmong 4000 patients, 2206 had hypothermia (55.2%), of which 150 developed SSI (6.8%). PSM yielded 1434 individuals in each group. After PSM, the hypothermia and normothermia groups demonstrated similar incidence rates of SSI (6.3% vs. 7.0%, P = 0.453), postoperative transfusion (13.3% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.743), and major complications (9.0% vs. 10.1%, P = 0.309). Univariate regression analysis revealed no significant effects of hypothermia on the incidence of SSI in the group with the highest hypothermia exposure [odds ratio (OR) = 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84-1.87, P = 0.266], the group with moderate exposure (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.65-1.53, P = 0.999), or the group with the lowest exposure (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.73-1.65, P = 0.628). The subgroup analysis revealed similar results. Regarding liver function, patients in the hypothermia group demonstrated lower γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (37 vs. 43 U/L, P = 0.001) and alkaline phosphatase (69 vs. 72 U/L, P = 0.016). However, patients in the hypothermia group exhibited prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (29.2 vs. 28.6 s, P < 0.01). ConclusionsIn our study of patients undergoing liver resection, we found no significant association between mild perioperative hypothermia and SSI. It might be due to the perioperative temperature managements, especially active warming measures, which limited the impact of perioperative hypothermia on the occurrence of SSI.

Impact of Liver Cirrhosis, Severity of Cirrhosis, and Portal Hypertension on the Difficulty and Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Major Liver Resections for Primary Liver Malignancies.

Minimally invasive liver resections (MILR) offer potential benefits such as reduced blood loss and morbidity compared with open liver resections. Several studies have suggested that the impact of cirrhosis differs according to the extent and complexity of resection. Our aim was to investigate the impact of cirrhosis on the difficulty and outcomes of MILR, focusing on major hepatectomies. A total of 2534 patients undergoing minimally invasive major hepatectomies (MIMH) for primary malignancies across 58 centers worldwide were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score (PSM) and coarsened exact matching (CEM) were used to compare patients with and without cirrhosis. A total of 1353 patients (53%) had no cirrhosis, 1065 (42%) had Child-Pugh A and 116 (4%) had Child-Pugh B cirrhosis. Matched comparison between non-cirrhotics vs Child-Pugh A cirrhosis demonstrated comparable blood loss. However, after PSM, postoperative morbidity and length of hospitalization was significantly greater in Child-Pugh A cirrhosis, but these were not statistically significant with CEM. Comparison between Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B cirrhosis demonstrated the latter had significantly higher transfusion rates and longer hospitalization after PSM, but not after CEM. Comparison of patients with cirrhosis of all grades with and without portal hypertension demonstrated no significant difference in all major perioperative outcomes after PSM and CEM. The presence and severity of cirrhosis affected the difficulty and impacted the outcomes of MIMH, resulting in higher blood transfusion rates, increased postoperative morbidity, and longer hospitalization in patients with more advanced cirrhosis. As such, future difficulty scoring systems for MIMH should incorporate liver cirrhosis and its severity as variables.