Major Laparoscopic Surgery Research Articles

Oxycodone vs. sufentanil combined with quadratus lumborum block vs. transverse abdominis plane block in laparoscopic major gastrointestinal surgery: A randomized factorial trial protocol

BackgroundMultimodal analgesia plays a key role in enhanced recovery after surgery. Herein, we describe a trial protocol investigating the effects of oxycodone-vs. sufentanil-based patient-controlled analgesia in combination with quadratus lumborum block (QLB) vs. transverse abdominis plane block (TAPB) on quality of recovery following major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Methodsand analysis: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. A total of 120 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic major gastrointestinal surgery will be randomized, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, to receive one of two patient-controlled analgesia regimens (based on oxycodone or sufentanil) and one of two regional blocks (QLB or TAPB). The primary outcome measure of this trial is the quality of recovery at 24 h after surgery, assessed using the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scale. The secondary outcomes include QoR-15 scores at 48 and 72 h after surgery; visceral and incisional pain at rest and while coughing at 1, 6, 24 and 48 h postoperatively; analgesic consumption within 0–24 h and 24–48 h postoperatively; need for rescue analgesia; postoperative flatus time; postoperative adverse events (sedation, nausea and vomiting, use of antiemetics, respiratory depression, and dizziness); and length of postoperative hospital stay. DiscussionThe results of this trial will provide evidence for the optimal multimodal analgesic strategy to improve the quality of recovery for patients undergoing laparoscopic major gastrointestinal surgery. Trial registrationThis trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2400080766).

Effect of Oxycodone-Based Multimodal Analgesia on Visceral Pain After Major Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

Oxycodone is a potent μ- and κ-opioid receptor agonist that can relieve both somatic and visceral pain. We assessed oxycodone- vs sufentanil-based multimodal analgesia on postoperative pain following major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. In this randomised double-blind controlled trial, 40 adult patients were randomised (1:1, stratified by type of surgery) to receive oxycodone- or sufentanil-based multimodal analgesia, comprising bilateral transverse abdominis plane blocks, intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion, flurbiprofen axetil, and oxycodone- or sufentanil-based patient-controlled analgesia. The co-primary outcomes were time-weighted average (TWA) of visceral pain (defined as intra-abdominal deep and dull pain) at rest and on coughing during 0-24 h postoperatively, assessed using the numerical rating scale (0-10) with a minimal clinically important difference of 1. All patients completed the study (median age, 64 years; 65% male) and had adequate postoperative pain control. The mean (SD) 24-h TWA of visceral pain at rest was 1.40 (0.77) in the oxycodone group vs 2.00 (0.98) in the sufentanil group (mean difference=-0.60, 95% CI, -1.16 to -0.03; P=0.039). Patients in the oxycodone group had a significantly lower 24-h TWA of visceral pain on coughing (2.00 [0.83] vs 2.98 [1.26]; mean difference=-0.98, 95% CI, -1.66 to -0.30; P=0.006). In the subgroup analyses, the treatment effect of oxycodone vs sufentanil on the co-primary outcomes did not differ in terms of age (18-65 years or >65 years), sex (female or male), or type of surgery (colorectal or gastric). Secondary outcomes (24-h TWA of incisional and shoulder pain, postoperative analgesic usage, rescue analgesia, adverse events, and patient satisfaction) were comparable between groups. For patients undergoing major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery, oxycodone-based multimodal analgesia reduced postoperative visceral pain in a statistically significant but not clinically important manner. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052085).

Comparison of Deep and Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade for Major Laparoscopic Surgery in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Neuromuscular blocking agents are routinely used in laparoscopic surgery to optimize operative conditions. We compared the effect of a deep and moderate neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on surgical conditions and postoperative outcomes in children undergoing major laparoscopic surgery. Sixty children aged 2-14 years scheduled to undergo major laparoscopic surgery were randomly allocated to deep (post-tetanic count 1-2 twitches) or moderate (train-of-four 1-2 twitches) NMB groups. The anesthesia was maintained with propofol and remifentanil, and the NMB was maintained with a rocuronium continuous infusion. At the end of the operation, the NMB were antagonized with sugammadex. The intra-abdominal pressure, airway pressure, Leiden Surgical Rating Scale, intraoperative hemodynamics, drug usages, duration of surgery, postoperative recovery time, pain, and complications were compared between the groups. The maximum and mean intra-abdominal pressure, the peak inspiratory pressure, and mean airway pressure were significantly lower in the deep NMB group than in the moderate NMB group (p < 0.001). The Leiden Surgical Rating Scale and the dosage of rocuronium were significantly higher in the deep NMB group than the moderate NMB group (p < 0.001). The intraoperative hemodynamics, duration of surgery, post-operative recovery time, pain, and the incidence rate of complications were not significantly different between the groups (p > 0.05). A deep NMB provided better operative conditions and similar recovery profiles compared with a moderate NMB as reversed with sugammadex in children undergoing major laparoscopic surgery. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, No. ChiCTR2100053821.

Ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragmatic excursion changes after major laparoscopic surgeries in the Trendelenburg position under general anaesthesia: A prospective observational study.

Laparoscopic surgeries result in increased intra abdominal pressure and cephalad displacement of the diaphragm. The Trendelenburg position can augment these respiratory changes. The primary objective of this study was to compare diaphragmatic excursions before and after a major laparoscopic pelvic surgery under general anaesthesia in the Trendelenburg position using ultrasonography (USG). This prospective observational study included 90 patients of either gender, aged 20-60 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I/II. M-mode USG was used to assess diaphragm inspiratory amplitude (DIA) before induction of anaesthesia and 10 minutes after tracheal extubation. Factors such as age, gender, body mass index, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), pain, peak airway pressures, duration of pneumoperitoneum, duration and degree of Trendelenburg position and duration of anaesthesia were recorded. Pearson's correlation and multiple linear regression were used to analyse the factors affecting change in DIA (ΔDIA). The mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI)) of measured DIA was 0.70 (0.598-0.809), P < 0.001. ΔDIA had a weak positive significant correlation with age, anaesthesia duration, pneumoperitoneum, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score 10 minutes after extubation. Multiple linear regression analysis showed 14.86% of the variance in DIA. Age (β = 0.008, P = 0.049), duration of anaesthesia (β = 0.002, P = 0.02) and VAS score 10 minutes after extubation (β = 0.128, P = 0.001) were significant independent predictors. DIA decreased significantly after pelvic laparoscopic surgeries performed in the Trendelenburg position. Age, duration of anaesthesia and pain after the procedure were significant independent predictors.

Perioperative Renal Ultrasonography of Arterio-to-Venous Coupling Predicts Postoperative Complications after Major Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery.

Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) with concomitant venous and arterial Doppler assessment enables clinicians to assess organ-specific blood supply. To date, no studies have investigated the usefulness of including a comprehensive perioperative POCUS assessment of patients undergoing major laparoscopic surgery. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the combined venous and arterial renal flow evaluation, measured at different time points of perioperative period, may represent a clinically useful non-invasive method to predict postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after major laparoscopic urologic surgery. The secondary outcome was represented by the development of any postoperative complication at day 7. We included 173 patients, subsequently divided for analysis depending on whether they did (n = 55) or did not (n = 118) develop postoperative AKI or any complications within the first 7 days. The main results of the present study were that: (1) the combination of arterial hypoperfusion and moderate-to-severe venous congestion inferred by POCUS were associated with worst outcomes (respectively, HR: 2.993, 95% CI: 1.522-5.884 and HR: 8.124, 95% CI: 3.542-18, p < 0.001); (2) high intra-operative abdominal pressure represents the only independent determinant of postoperative severe venous congestion (OR: 1.354, 95% CI: 1.017-1.804, p = 0.038); (3) the overall number of complications relies on the balance between arterial inflow and venous outflow in order to ensure the adequacy of peripheral perfusion; and (4) the overall reliability of splanchnic perfusion assessment by Doppler is high with a strong inter-rater reliability (ICC: 0.844, 95% CI: 0.792-0.844). The concomitant assessment of arterial and venous Doppler patterns predicts postoperative complications after major laparoscopic urologic surgery and may be considered a useful ultrasonographic biomarker to stratify vulnerable patients at risk for development of postoperative complications.

Effect of Lung Compliance-Based Optimum Pressure Versus Fixed Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Lung Atelectasis Assessed by Modified Lung Ultrasound Score in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lung protective ventilation during the intraoperative period is now well established. However, the additional role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during the intraoperative period remains uncertain in major laparoscopic gynecological surgery. The authors hypothesized that compliance-based optimum PEEP titration reduces postoperative lung atelectasis and improves outcomes. Patients undergoing major laparoscopic pelvic gynecological surgeries with healthy lungs were randomized to the fixed PEEP group (PEEP 5 cm H2O and recruitment maneuver {RM}) and optimum PEEP group (compliance-based PEEP and RM). Lung ultrasound and arterial blood gas analysis were performed at four time points. Modified lung ultrasound scoring was done, and the same was used as means of assessing lung aeration and the amount of lung atelectasis. Postoperative supplemental oxygen requirement and duration were also assessed and compared. Lung ultrasound score (LUS) 30 minutes after extubation in fixed (Group F) and optimum (Group O) PEEP groups were median (interquartile range {IQR}) 3 (2-3) versus 1 (1-2),p=0.0001. Ventilatory parameters between Group F and Group Oafter lung recruitmentwere tidal volume (mean357 mL {SD: 35} versus 362 mL {SD: 22}, p=0.46), PEEP (median, 5 cm H2O {IQR: 5-5} versus median 16 cm H2O {IQR: 14-18}), peak airway pressure (median 26 cm H2O {IQR: 24-28} versus median30 cm H2O {IQR: 28-32} p<0.0001), plateau pressure (median22 cm H2O {IQR: 20-24} versus median26 cm H2O {IQR: 24-28} p<0.0001), static compliance (32.07±8.36 mL cm H2O-1 versus 39.58±8.99 mL cm H2O-1, p=0.0002). The number of patients requiring postoperative oxygen therapy to maintain SpO2>94% after extubation in postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was statistically significantly greater in group F (39/41 {95%} versus 30/41 {73%}, p=0.007). Median (IQR) duration of oxygenation therapy in the first 24 hours of the postoperative period between Group F and Group O differed with statistical significance, with the median (IQR) values being 25 (20-30) minutes versus 10 (0-15) minutes (p<0.0001). The modified lung ultrasound score significantly differed intraoperatively between the two groups, with lower scores in the optimum PEEP group. This has reflected improved postoperative outcomes in optimum PEEP group patients, with fewer patients requiring postoperative oxygen supplementation and reduced supplemental oxygen requirement duration.

First experiences with a diode laser in major gynecological laparoscopic procedures show lack of benefit and impaired feasibility

PurposeThe aim of this study is to evaluate feasibility and potential benefit of a diode laser in major laparoscopic procedures in gynecology.MethodsBetween 2018 and 2020, a total of 42 cases were enrolled in this study comparing standard electrosurgery with diode laser-supported therapy in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH), total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), or laparoscopic myoma enucleation (LME). Dual wavelength 45 W diode laser light was used to cut and coagulate during laparoscopy in the prospective interventional arm consisting of 11 cases, while 31 matching patients who received conventional treatment with monopolar/bipolar current for the same interventions were retrospectively identified in our laparoscopy database. Recruitment in the prospective interventional laser diode arm was terminated after only 11 patients (instead of planned 50) due to intense hemorrhage and massive smoke development.ResultsA total of 42 cases were analyzed (11 LME, 19 LASH, and 12 TLH). Strong smoke development was evident in all 11 cases in the diode laser arm. It was necessary to convert to bipolar or monopolar current in all hysterectomies (n = 9) with initial diode laser implementation due to increased bleeding and smoke development. Conventional current sources had to be used in LMEs (n = 2) due to excessive bleeding and poor visibility during enucleation of the fibroid. A significant difference (p < 0.0001) was observed regarding smoke development when comparing the laser arm with the control arm.ConclusionWe found a 45-W diode laser to be inferior to electrosurgical techniques for major laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries regarding bleeding control and smoke development.

Low Intra-Abdominal Pressure with Complete Neuromuscular Blockage Reduces Post-Operative Complications in Major Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery: A before-after Study.

Most urological interventions are now performed with minimally invasive surgery techniques such as laparoscopic surgery. Combining ERAS protocols with minimally invasive surgery techniques may be the best option to reduce hospital length-of-stay and post-operative complications. We designed this study to test the hypothesis that using low intra-abdominal pressures (IAP) during laparoscopy may reduce post-operative complications, especially those related to reduced intra-operative splanchnic perfusion or increased splanchnic congestion. We applied a complete neuromuscular blockade (NMB) to maintain an optimal space and surgical view. We compared 115 patients treated with standard IAP and moderate NMB with 148 patients treated with low IAP and complete NMB undergoing major urologic surgery. Low IAP in combination with complete NMB was associated with fewer total post-operative complications than standard IAP with moderate NMB (22.3% vs. 41.2%, p < 0.001), with a reduction in all medical post-operative complications (17 vs. 34, p < 0.001). The post-operative complications mostly reduced were acute kidney injury (15.5% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.004), anemia (6.8% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.049) and reoperation (2% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.035). The intra-operative management of laparoscopic interventions for major urologic surgeries with low IAP and complete NMB is feasible without hindering surgical conditions and might reduce most medical post-operative complications.

Dexmedetomidine Improves Non-rapid Eye Movement Stage 2 Sleep in Children in the Intensive Care Unit on the First Night After Laparoscopic Surgery.

BackgroundPrevious studies have reported that children who were admitted to the ICU experienced a significant decrease in sleep quality compared to home. We investigated the effects of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to sufentanil on the sleep in children admitted to the ICU on the first night after major surgery.MethodsThis is a prospective study From January to February 2022. Clinical trial number: ChiCTR2200055768, http://www.chictr.org.cn. Fifty-four children aged 1–10 years old children undergoing major laparoscopic surgery were recruited and randomly assigned to either the DEX group, in which intravenous dexmedetomidine (0.3 ug/kg/h) and sufentanil (0.04 ug/kg/h) were continuously infused intravenously for post-operative analgesia; or the SUF group, in which only sufentanil (0.04 ug/kg/h) was continuously infused. Patients were monitored with polysomnography (PSG) on the first night after surgery for 12 h. PSG, sleep architecture, physiologic variables and any types of side effects related to anesthesia and analgesia were recorded. The differences between the two groups were assessed using the chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.ResultsFifty-four children completed data collection, of which thirty-four were 1–6 years old and twenty were aged >6 years. Compared to the SUF group, subjects in the DEX group aged 1–6 years displayed increased stage 2 sleep duration (P = 0.02) and light sleep duration (P = 0.02). Subjects aged >6 years in the DEX group also displayed increased stage 2 sleep duration (P = 0.035) and light sleep duration (P = 0.018), but decreased REM sleep percentage (P = 0). Additionally, the heart rate and blood pressure results differed between age groups, with the heart rates of subjects aged >6 years in DEX group decreasing at most time points compared to SUF group (P < 0.05).ConclusionDexmedetomidine prolonged N2 sleep and light sleep duration in the pediatric ICU after surgery but had different effects on the heart rate and blood pressure of subjects in different age groups.

Does deep neuromuscular blockade provide improved outcomes in low pressure laparoscopic colorectal surgery? A single blinded randomized pilot study.

Low intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic colorectal surgery may improve outcomes and reduce hospital stay, in addition to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. There is concern that low pressure reduces laparoscopic vision and may increase surgical complications. Deep neuromuscular blockade may abrogate any reduction in vision of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. However, antagonism of deep neuromuscular blockade at completion of surgery necessitates the use of sugammadex, which is prohibitively expensive, if there are no surgical benefits and warrants further study. A single institution, single blinded randomized controlled pilot study was performed comparing deep to moderate neuromuscular blockade in major laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Thirty-eight patients were randomized to deep or moderate neuromuscular blockade. There were no statistically significant differences between groups, when comparing key patient demographics, or surgeon satisfaction with view, which required increased pressure or further relaxation demands. The deep blockade group had increased QoR15 scores and a decrease in pain, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) measurements and operating times, although were non-significant. The moderate group had slightly higher incidents of Medical Emergency Team (MET) calls and more severe complications, although were non-significant. Low intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is feasible and allows adequate surgical visualization, regardless of the degree of neuromuscular blockade. Potential benefits of deep neuromuscular blockade may include improved pain and quality of recovery and a possible reduction of complications; however a larger cohort is required to confirm this. Future ERAS protocols may consider deep neuromuscular blockade with low intra-abdominal pressure to further benefit patients.

Deep Neuromuscular Blockade Combined with Low Pneumoperitoneum Pressure for Nociceptive Recovery After Major Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

PurposePatients undergoing major laparoscopic surgery often experience significant pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Deep neuromuscular block (NMB) improves surgical conditions and facilitates the application of low intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), which may be beneficial for these patients. This study is designed to determine the effects of deep NMB combined with low IAP, as compared to moderate NMB combined with standard IAP, on patients’ nociceptive recovery after major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.Study Design and MethodsThis single-center randomized controlled trial will include 220 patients scheduled for major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery (lasts for ≥ 90 minutes). Patients will be randomly assigned, with a 1:1 ratio, into a deep NMB + low IAP group (train of four = 0, post-tetanic count = 1–3, IAP = 8 mmHg) and a moderate NMB + standard IAP group (train of four = 1–3, IAP = 12 mmHg). If the surgical workspace is inadequate, the surgeons can request a step increase of 1 mmHg in IAP during 3-min intervals. The upper limit of IAP will be set at 15 mmHg. Postoperative recovery will be assessed using the postoperative quality recovery scale (PQRS). The primary outcome of this trial is the PQRS nociceptive recovery (including pain and PONV) at postoperative day (POD) 1. The secondary outcomes include recovery in other PQRS domains at POD 1, and recovery in all PQRS domains in a post-anesthesia care unit, at POD 3 in the surgical wards, at hospital discharge, and at postoperative 30 days. For the sample size estimation, 110 patients in each group (220 in total) would be needed to detect an absolute increase rate of 20% in the PQRS nociceptive domain in the deep NMB + low IAP group at POD 1.DiscussionThis study investigates the effects of deep NMB combined with low IAP on postoperative PQRS nociceptive recovery in patients undergoing major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. We expect that this deep NMB + low IAP strategy would improve postoperative pain and PONV following major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

Prospective Evaluation of Post-Operative Pain and Erythema Stratified By Anti-Slip Bed Surface

Study Objective To assess differences in post-operative pain and erythema on a variety of anti-slip surfaces after minimally invasive gynecologic surgery Design Prospective randomized controlled trial with a minimum 6-week post-operative follow up Setting Patient positioning with Trendelenburg. Patients or Participants Patients undergoing major laparoscopic or vaginal surgery (hysterectomy or surgery >2 hours) were randomly assigned to one of three anti-slip surfaces: Pink Pad, Action O.R. Overlay (gelpad) or Olympic Vac-Pac (beanbag) from 6/2018-12/2019. 159 patients were enrolled with 148 found to be eligible. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1:1 one of the three anti-slip surfaces. Measurements and Main Results Patients were pre-operatively assigned to one of three anti-slip surfaces. Pain was assessed on a standard 1-10 scale and erythema was assessed as a binary, present or absent. Pain was assessed in pre-operative holding and as the first pain score after surgery by the post anesthesia care unit nurse. Erythema was assessed in pre-operative holding and immediately after the operation. The pre-operative pain and erythema scores were not significantly different based on Tukey's multiple comparisons and proportion test respectively. Post-operative back pain was significantly less in the Pink Pad group versus the gelpad (0.96 vs. 2.40 points, p=0.036). Post-operative erythema was significantly less common in the Pink Pad group versus the beanbag group (6.2% vs. 30% respectively, p=0.017). Conclusion While overall post-operative pain control was excellent, there was a significantly less pain in the Pink Pad group versus the gelpad group. This finding presents a novel opportunity to limit the narcotic requirement after minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Given the difference in post-operative erythema between the Pink Pad and beanbag, further study is warranted to assess the role of bed surface and skin irritation. To assess differences in post-operative pain and erythema on a variety of anti-slip surfaces after minimally invasive gynecologic surgery Prospective randomized controlled trial with a minimum 6-week post-operative follow up Patient positioning with Trendelenburg. Patients undergoing major laparoscopic or vaginal surgery (hysterectomy or surgery >2 hours) were randomly assigned to one of three anti-slip surfaces: Pink Pad, Action O.R. Overlay (gelpad) or Olympic Vac-Pac (beanbag) from 6/2018-12/2019. 159 patients were enrolled with 148 found to be eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 one of the three anti-slip surfaces. Patients were pre-operatively assigned to one of three anti-slip surfaces. Pain was assessed on a standard 1-10 scale and erythema was assessed as a binary, present or absent. Pain was assessed in pre-operative holding and as the first pain score after surgery by the post anesthesia care unit nurse. Erythema was assessed in pre-operative holding and immediately after the operation. The pre-operative pain and erythema scores were not significantly different based on Tukey's multiple comparisons and proportion test respectively. Post-operative back pain was significantly less in the Pink Pad group versus the gelpad (0.96 vs. 2.40 points, p=0.036). Post-operative erythema was significantly less common in the Pink Pad group versus the beanbag group (6.2% vs. 30% respectively, p=0.017). While overall post-operative pain control was excellent, there was a significantly less pain in the Pink Pad group versus the gelpad group. This finding presents a novel opportunity to limit the narcotic requirement after minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Given the difference in post-operative erythema between the Pink Pad and beanbag, further study is warranted to assess the role of bed surface and skin irritation.

Every Inch Counts: A Prospective Randomized Trial of Anti-Slip Surfaces in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery

Study Objective To assess the effectiveness of common anti-slip surfaces on reducing intra-operative patient displacement while in Trendelenburg Design Prospective randomized controlled trial with a minimum 6-week post-operative follow up Setting Patient positioning with Trendelenburg Patients or Participants Patients undergoing major laparoscopic or vaginal surgery (hysterectomy or surgery >2 hours) were randomly assigned to one of three anti-slip surfaces: Pink Pad, Action O.R. Overlay (gelpad) or Olympic Vac-Pac (beanbag) from 6/2018-12/2019. 159 patients were enrolled with 148 found to be eligible. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1:1 one of the three anti-slip surfaces. Measurements and Main Results Patients were pre-operatively assigned to one of three anti-slip surfaces. Intra-operative displacement was assessed by measuring multiple anatomic landmarks [perineum, anteriorsuperior iliac spine (ASIS), umbilicus, acromion and the head] at three times during the case: 1) pre-op, 2) when placed in Trendelenburg, and 3) prior to leveling. Positioning time and time added due to obstructed uterine manipulation were recorded. There was significantly less total movement on the Pink Pad at all anatomic landmarks compared to the gelpad (2.75-5.66cm) and for the torso (ASIS & perineum) compared to the beanbag (1.22-2.69cm). The most consistent predictors of movement included: height, weight, and body mass distribution. Obesity increased displacement by 32-55%. Surgery type, length of surgery, and maximum Trendelenburg did not predict displacement. Laparoscopic surgery with robotic assistance had greater displacement than without (p Conclusion Patients on the Pink Pad had significantly less displacement with Trendelenburg and faster positioning compared to the other surfaces. Obesity is a major predictor of movement. Uterine manipulation was easier on the Pink Pad than the beanbag.

A survey of neuraxial analgesic preferences in open and laparoscopic major abdominal surgery amongst anaesthetists in Australia and New Zealand.

Practising anaesthetists who are Fellows of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists were surveyed with the objective of gaining insight into current analgesic preferences, with particular regard to neuraxial techniques, when managing patients having major open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Major abdominal surgery is common and effective analgesia is fundamental to optimal postoperative recovery. A multitude of analgesic options exist, with epidurals recommended in recent Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols. We believe the place of epidurals is increasingly questioned in the setting of continuous improvement in surgical technique, with increasing laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery. Evidence for various techniques is mixed and benefit-risk profiles exist for all alternatives. An opioid epidemic and abuse crisis has directed attention towards opioid minimisation strategies. The survey was completed by 28% (275) of the 975 Fellows who received it, with good representation across the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists' general membership. Respondents manage laparoscopic major abdominal surgery more frequently than open procedures, with approximately one-third of respondents each providing anaesthesia for two open laparotomies versus four to eight laparoscopic cases per month. Respondents reported a high perceived benefit of neuraxial analgesia, which was discordant with their clinical practice. Less than half of the respondents used epidural or spinal analgesia in open surgery (48% versus 49% of respondents, respectively). A minority (16%) of respondents use a neuraxial technique in major laparoscopic surgery, with a strong preference for intrathecal morphine (74%) when they choose to do so. Further investigation of the role of intrathecal analgesia is warranted given the shift towards laparoscopic major abdominal surgery, the perceived benefits of neuraxial techniques and the need for opioid-sparing analgesic strategies.

Effect of pneumoperitoneum pressure and the depth of neuromuscular block on renal function in patients with diabetes undergoing laparoscopic pelvic surgery: study protocol for a double-blinded 2 \xd7 2 factorial randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPatients with diabetes mellitus are at a high risk of developing postoperative acute kidney injury. For patients receiving laparoscopic surgery, standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP) currently applied in clinical practice also undermines renal perfusion. Several studies have shown that low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP) might reduce pressure-related ischemic renal injury. However, LPP may compromise the view of the surgical field. Previous studies have indicated that deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) can ameliorate this issue. However, the conclusion is still uncertain. The hypothesis of this study is that the joint use of LPP and deep NMB can reduce perioperative renal injury in diabetic patients undergoing laparoscopic pelvic surgery without impeding the view of the surgical field.MethodsThis is a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial using a 2 × 2 factorial trial design. A total of 648 diabetes patients scheduled for major laparoscopic pelvic surgeries at Peking Union Medical College Hospital will be randomized into the following four groups: SPP (12–15 mmHg) + deep-NMB (post-tetanic count of 1–2) group, LPP (7–10 mmHg) + deep-NMB group, SPP + moderate-NMB (train-of-four of 1–2) group, and LPP + moderate-NMB group. The primary outcome is serum cystatin C level measured before insufflation, after deflation, 24 h postoperatively, and 72 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are serum creatinine level, intraoperative urine output, erythrocytes in urinary sediment, renal tissue oxygen saturation, Leiden’s surgical condition rating scale, surgery duration, and occurrence of bucking or body movement.DiscussionThis study will provide evidence for the effect of LPP on renal function protection in patients with diabetes undergoing laparoscopic pelvic surgery. The trial can also help us to understand whether deep NMB can improve surgical conditions.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04259112. Prospectively registered on 5 February 2020.

The LAPLAP study: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial assessing postoperative functional recovery using intraperitoneal local anaesthetic in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Postoperative pain remains a major factor in recovery from colorectal resection. There is increasing interest in opioid-sparing analgesia, and intraperitoneal local anaesthetic (IPLA) has recently been shown to be useful in minor laparoscopic and open colorectal procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of IPLA on functional recovery following major laparoscopic surgery. In this controlled trial, mobility, as measured by the De Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI), was used as a surrogate for postoperative functional recovery. Patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection were randomized either to continuous ropivacaine (0.2% at 4-6ml/h) or to saline (0.9%) which were administered via intraperitoneal catheter for 3days postoperatively. Results were analysed in a double-blind manner. DEMMIs were assessed on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 7 and 30, and data on pain, opioid consumption, gut and respiratory function, length of stay (LOS) and complications were recorded. Ninety-six patients were recruited. There was no difference in primary outcome (i.e., functional recovery) between IPLA and placebo groups. Opioid consumption and LOS were similar between groups, and no differences were found for any secondary outcome measure. There were no adverse events related to ropivacaine. Infusional intraperitoneal local anaesthetic appears to be safe but does not improve functional recovery or analgesic consumption following elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery, in the setting of an established enhanced recovery programme.

Clinical effects of warmed humidified carbon dioxide insufflation in infants undergoing major laparoscopic surgery

Purpose:Some studies have reported that warmed humidified carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation in adult laparoscopic surgery could reduce pain and improve the core body temperature (CBT). However, similar studies are lacking in infants. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the clinical effects of warmed, humidified CO2 insufflation in pediatric patients undergoing major laparoscopic surgeries.Methods:From January 2015 to December 2017, infants who underwent major laparoscopic surgeries in Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital were randomized to Group A (standard CO2 insufflation) or Group B (warmed humidified CO2 insufflation, 35°C, 95% relative humidity). Change in CBT at the end of surgery was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, oxygen saturation (SO2), and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale. These variables were compared between the 2 groups.Results:Sixty-three infants (38 females, 25 males) were included; 30 patients were in Group A and 33 in Group B. The diseases treated with the laparoscopic approach included congenital megacolon, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, and intestinal malrotation. No deaths were noted. CBT was significantly higher in Group B at the end of surgery (P = .021). The occurrence of postoperative shivering (P = .02), hypothermia (P = .032), bowel movement (P = .044), and hospital stay (P = .038) was significantly different between the 2 groups; Group B had less shivering and hypothermia occurrence after surgery. Moreover, Group B demonstrated a more rapid postoperative recovery of bowel movement and shortened hospital stay than Group A. There was no statistical difference in operative time (P = .162), intraoperative blood loss (P = .541), SO2 (P = .59), and FLACC scale (P = .65) between the 2 groups.Conclusion:The use of warmed humidified CO2 insufflation in infants undergoing major laparoscopic surgery was helpful for maintaining normothermia and was associated with several positive postoperative outcomes, including less shivering and hypothermia, faster recovery of bowel movement, and shortened hospital stay.

Comparison of Outcomes Between Open Major Hepatectomy Using CUSA and Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomy Using "Lotus" Liver Blade. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Introduction: Evolution in laparoscopic liver surgery during the past two decades is an indisputable fact. According to the second international consensus conference for laparoscopic liver resection held in Morioka, Japan in 2014 major resections are still regarded as innovative procedures in the exploration phase. On this basis, our study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic vs. open major liver resection and therefore increase the existing evidence on major laparoscopic liver surgery.Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent major liver resection, open and laparoscopic from January 2016 to May 2018 were identified from our prospectively maintained database. Propensity score matching analysis was performed using R statistical tool in SPSS to isolate matched open and laparoscopic cases which were compared for intraoperative and postoperative short-term outcomes. Lotus ultrasonic energy device was used for parenchymal transection in laparoscopic cases vs. CUSA in open procedures.Results: Propensity score matching analysis was performed on 82 consecutive patients (61 open and 21 laparoscopic major hepatectomies) resulting in 40 matched patients, 20 in each group. The mean total duration of surgery and duration of parenchymal transection were slightly longer in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.419, p = 0.348). There was no difference in the intraoperative and postoperative transfusion rates. Patients after laparoscopic surgery were discharged 2 days earlier on average (p = 0.310). No difference was observed in complication rates and mortality.Conclusion: Our data did not reveal inferiority of the laparoscopic major hepatectomy vs. the open approach in any parameter compared. The use of the Lotus ultrasonic energy device appeared to be efficient and safe for parenchymal transection in the laparoscopic procedures.

Analgesia after major laparoscopic surgery in patients with chronic kidney disease: A retrospective cohort study

The amount of reduction in opioid doses and its effect on postoperative pain outcomes in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in the perioperative setting remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate differences in postoperative pain outcomes after major laparoscopic surgery between patients with CKD and those with normal preoperative kidney function. Medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic major abdominal surgery from January 2010 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed, and 6,612 patients were finally included. During postoperative day (POD) 0–3, patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL min−1 1.73 m−2 had 3.5% lower morphine equivalent consumption than those with an eGFR ≥ 90 mL min−1 1.73 m−2 (P = 0.023), whereas patients with preoperative eGFR between 60–90 mL min−1 1.73 m−2 and 30–60 mL min−1 1.73 m−2 showed no significant differences in morphine equivalent consumption. Additionally, pain scores at rest during POD 0–3 were not significantly associated with preoperative kidney function. In conclusion, our results suggest that patients with mild to moderate CKD (stage 2–3) did not require reduction of opioid analgesics during POD 0–3, compared to patients with normal preoperative kidney function. Only patients with severe CKD (stage ≥ 4) might require a slight reduction of opioid analgesics.

Changes of diaphragmatic excursion and lung compliance during major laparoscopic pelvic surgery: A prospective observational study.

Major laparoscopic pelvic surgery requires steep Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum for a long time. We investigated the effect of Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum on diaphragmatic excursion and lung compliance during major laparoscopic pelvic surgery using M-mode sonography. Twenty patients undergoing elective pelviscopic radical hysterectomy were included in this study. Diaphragmatic excursion was measured at the following time points; after sedation, after intubation, 90 minutes after Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum, and after operation with recovery of muscle relaxation. And lung compliance was measured using anesthetic machine under general anesthesia; after the intubation, 90 minutes after Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum and after operation with recovery of muscle relaxation. In order to detect postoperative pulmonary complication, postoperative chest radiography was checked. Static lung compliance, dynamic lung compliance and diaphragmatic excursion were decreased during operation (P < 0.001, respectively). At the end of the operation with recovery of muscle relaxation, reduced diaphragmatic movement was not recovered as its excursion after sedation (P < 0.001). In conclusion, lung compliance was decreased following transiently decreased diaphragmatic excursion during major laparoscopic pelvic surgery.