Major Hepatectomy Research Articles

Preliminary Results from the International Registry on Liver Venous Deprivation (EuroLVD)

Abstract Background Liver venous deprivation (LVD) is a recently developed method to reach maximal liver hypertrophy before major hepatectomy. LVD combines simultaneous portal and ipsilateral hepatic vein embolization. An international registry was created in 2021. Aims This study aimed to describe the outcomes after LVD of patients included in the registry. Methods Since its creation, 7 international expert HPB centers participated to the registry. Preoperative characteristics, data on liver regeneration after LVD, and postoperative results after hepatectomy were collected. Future liver remnant (FLR) and standardized FLR ratios were defined as FLR/total functional liver volume and FLR/total estimated liver volume. Results A total of 191 patients were included (71 women). Median age was 63 (IQR 53-69) and body-mass index 24.8 kg/m2 (IQR 22.3-28.7). Fifty-three patients were ASA III/IV. Main surgical indication was colorectal metastases (n=116). Median FLR and standardized FLR ratios before LVD were 33% (IQR 26-47) and 32% (IQR 23-39). Median time for the LVD procedure was 122 minutes (IQR 99-164). In one patient right hepatic vein embolization failed. Complications after LVD occurred in 14 patients (7%), including 7 hemorrhages/hematomas. After LVD, median FLR and standardized FLR ratios significantly increased to 46% (IQR 39-59, p<0.001) and 44% (IQR 35-50, p<0.001), corresponding to a median kinetic growth rate of 3.2%/week (IQR 1.6-5.3). Hepatectomy was performed in 142 patients (69 extended hepatectomies), while 49 dropped out (7 for insufficient hypertrophy (4%), 27 for tumor progression (14%), and 15 for other reasons (8%)). Seventy-one patients had postoperative complications (50%), and only 2 developed postoperative liver failure (1%). Median Comprehensive Complication Index was 20.9 (IQR 0-30.8) and 10 patients were reoperated (7%). Conclusion The preliminary data of this international registry showed that LVD had a high technical success rate (190/191) with few post-procedural complications and significant kinetic growth. Major hepatectomy after LVD appeared to be safe.

Investigating the Effect of Liver Regeneration on Tumor Growth: Development of a Mouse Model with Orthotopic Implantation of Patient-derived HCC Organoids

Abstract Background Recurrence after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment is a significant problem. It affects more than 70% of patients undergoing liver resection. Recurrence can arise from undetected micro metastasis or de novo cancer. Clinical and experimental studies suggest that liver regeneration ensuing surgical resection may activate occult micro-metastasis leading to regeneration induced tumor recurrence. However, in vivo patient-derived organoid (PDO) HCC models that are translatable to patient tumors are sparse. Aims Here, we aim to establish a new in vivo model to understand the impact of liver regeneration on HCC tumor growth. Methods PDOs were generated from HCC tissue obtained from patients undergoing liver resection at the Clarunis University Digestive Health and Care Center and transduced with firefly luciferase. Implantation was performed via laparotomy and orthotopic injection of the organoids in the right superior liver lobe. Tumor growth is monitored by in vivo bioluminescence imaging until the endpoint of the experiment. As a primary endpoint tumor growth two weeks after liver resection was defined. Experimental groups underwent either minor (30%) or major (65%) hepatectomy of tumor-free liver, whereas the control group received a re-laparotomy with subsequent closure of the abdomen. Normal liver and tumor tissue were characterized using immunohistochemistry. Results Two HCC-PDO lines were successfully implanted. Compared to the control, after minor and major liver resection the mean weight increased significantly to 0.82% (p < 0.0001) respectively 0.99% (p < 0.0001). Preliminary data about the tumor volume have yet to be concluded. Histology and immunohistochemistry staining for HCC confirmed the origin of the PDOs from the original patient tumor. Conclusion The establishment of an orthotopic xenograft mouse model for HCC PDO was successful. Through liver resection, a regenerative environment could be achieved, to investigate the molecular behavior of HCC recurrence after surgery. This offers the basis to study potential new targets and mechanisms to improve HCC-treatment.

Surgical Resection in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: An Umbrella Review.

Surgical resection is the gold standard for treating synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The resection of the primary tumor and metastatic lesions can follow different sequences: "simultaneous", "bowel-first", and "liver-first". Conservative approaches, such as parenchymal-sparing surgery and segmentectomy, may serve as alternatives to major hepatectomy. A comprehensive search of Medline, Epistemonikos, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies evaluating patients who underwent surgery for CRLM and reported survival results were included. Other secondary outcomes were analyzed, including disease-free survival, perioperative complications and mortality, and recurrence rates. Quality assessment was performed using the AMSTAR-2 method. No significant differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, and secondary outcomes were observed when comparing simultaneous to "bowel-first" resections, despite a higher rate of perioperative mortality in the former group. The 5-year OS was significantly higher for simultaneous resection compared to "liver-first" resection. No significant differences in OS and DFS were noted when comparing "liver-first" to "bowel-first" resection, or anatomic to non-anatomic resection. Our umbrella review validates simultaneous surgery as an effective oncological approach for treating SCRLM, though the increased risk of perioperative morbidity highlights the importance of selecting suitable patients. Non-anatomic resections might be favored to preserve liver function and enable future surgical interventions.

Neuroendocrine Tumors of Unknown Primary in the Setting of Cytoreductive Hepatectomy.

Surgical cytoreduction for neuroendocrine tumor liver metastasis (NETLM) consistently shows positive long-term outcomes. Despite reservations in guidelines for surgery when the primary tumor is unidentified (UP-NET), this study compared the surgical and oncologic long-term outcomes between patients with these rare cases undergoing cytoreductive surgery and patients who had liver resection for known primaries. The study identified 32 unknown primary liver metastases (UP-NETLM) in 522 retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent resection of well-differentiated NETLM between January 2000 and December 2020. Tumor and patient characteristics were compared with those in 490 cases of liver metastasis from small intestinal (SI-NETLM) or pancreatic (pNETLM) primaries. Survival analysis was performed to highlight long-term outcome differences. Surgical outcomes were compared between liver resections alone and simultaneous primary resections to assess surgical risk distinctions. The UP-NET patients had fewer NETLMs (p = 0.004), which on the average were largerthan SI-NETLMs or pNETLMs (p = 0.002). Expression of Ki-67 was balanced among the groups. Major hepatectomy was performed more often in the UP-NETLM group (p = 0.017). The 10-year survival rate of 53% for UP-NETLM was comparable with that for SI-NETML (58%; p = 0.463) and pNETLMs (47%; p = 0.497). The median hepatic progression-free survival was 26 months for the UP-NETLM patients and 25 months for the SI-NETLM patients compared to 12 months for the pNETLM patients (p < 0.001). Perioperative mortality was lower than 2%, and severe postoperative morbidity occurred in 21%, similarly distributed among all the groups. The surgical risk and long-term outcomes for the UP-NETLM patients were comparable with those for other NETLM cases, affirming the validity of equally aggressive surgical cytoreduction as a therapeutic option in carefully selected cases.

Abnormal coagulation after hepatectomy in patients with normal preoperative coagulation function

BackgroundTo explore the risk factors for postoperative abnormal coagulation (PAC) and establish a predictive model for patients with normal preoperative coagulation function who underwent hepatectomy.Materials and MethodsA total of 661 patients with normal preoperative coagulation function who underwent hepatectomy between January 2015 and December 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were divided into two groups: the postoperative abnormal coagulation group (PAC group, n = 362) and the normal coagulation group (non-PAC group, n = 299). Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were used to identify the risk factors for PAC.ResultsThe incidence of PAC in 661 patients who underwent hepatectomy was 54.8% (362/661). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used for multivariate logistic regression analysis. The preoperative international normalized ratio (INR), intraoperative succinyl gelatin infusion and major hepatectomy were found to be independent risk factors for PAC. A nomogram for predicting the PAC after hepatectomy was constructed. The model presented a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.742 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.697–0.786) in the training cohort. The validation set demonstrated a promising ROC of 0.711 (95% CI: 0.639–0.783), and the calibration curve closely approximated the true incidence. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess the clinical usefulness of the predictive model. The risk of PAC increased when the preoperative international normalized ratio (INR) was greater than 1.025 and the volume of intraoperative succinyl gelatin infusion was greater than 1500 ml.ConclusionThe PAC is closely related to the preoperative INR, intraoperative succinyl gelatin infusion and major hepatectomy. A three-factor prediction model was successfully established for predicting the PAC after hepatectomy.

Long-term survival after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a single-center study in Iran

BackgroundSurgical resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) has been associated with improved survival in these patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of liver metastasectomy, also finding independent factors related to survival after liver metastasectomy.MethodsIn a retrospective study, all patients with CRLM who underwent resection of liver metastases between 2012 and 2022 at Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex in Tehran, Iran, were enrolled. All patients were actively followed based on clinicopathologic and operative data.ResultsA total of 248 patients with a median follow-up time of 46 months (Range, 12 to 122) were studied. Eighty-six patients (35.0%) underwent major hepatectomy, whereas 160 (65.0%) underwent minor hepatectomy. The median overall survival was 43 months (Range, 0 to 122 months), with estimated 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of 91%, 56%, and 42%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a metastasis size > 6 cm, major hepatectomy, rectum as the primary tumor site, and involved margin (< 1 mm) were independent factors associated with decreased overall survival (OS).ConclusionSurgical resection is an effective treatment for patients with CRLM that is associated with relatively favorable survival. A negative margin of 1 mm seems to be sufficient for oncological resection.

Predictive factors of 90-day mortality after curative hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a western single-center observational study

PurposeThe aim of this study was to identify predictive risk factors associated with 90-day mortality after hepatic resection (HR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsAll patients undergoing elective resection for HCC from a single- institutional and prospectively maintained database were included. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to identify pre- and intraoperative as well as histopathological predictive factors of 90-day mortality after elective HR.ResultsBetween August 2004 and October 2021, 196 patients were enrolled (148 male /48 female). The median age of the study cohort was 68.5 years (range19-84 years). The rate of major hepatectomy (≥ 3 segments) was 43.88%. Multivariate analysis revealed patient age ≥ 70 years [HR 2.798; (95% CI 1.263–6.198); p = 0.011], preoperative chronic renal insufficiency [HR 3.673; (95% CI 1.598–8.443); p = 0.002], Child–Pugh Score [HR 2.240; (95% CI 1.188–4.224); p = 0.013], V-Stage [HR 2.420; (95% CI 1.187–4.936); p = 0.015], and resected segments ≥ 3 [HR 4.700; (95% 1.926–11.467); p = 0.001] as the major significant determinants of the 90-day mortality.ConclusionAdvanced patient age, pre-existing chronic renal insufficiency, Child–Pugh Score, extended hepatic resection, and vascular tumor involvement were identified as significant predictive factors of 90-day mortality. Proper patient selection and adjustment of treatment strategies could potentially reduce short-term mortality.

Histological and radiological analysis of simultaneous dual hepatic vein embolization for right-sided major hepatectomy.

Simultaneous dual hepatic vein embolization (DHVE) has been proposed for safe right-sided hepatectomy, with good results for liver hypertrophy and function. However, the histological and radiological findings of DHVE have not been thoroughly investigated. This study included 14 patients who underwent DHVE before right-sided major hepatectomy. DHVE was performed if the future liver remnant was < 35% or borderline, but with concomitant vascular resection. The liver function was assessed using the signal intensity on Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI. A histological evaluation of the area of DHVE and portal vein embolization (PVE) were performed. The median pre- and post-functional liver remnants were 363ml and 498ml, respectively (p < 0.001). The median growth rate was 48.6%, and there was no post-hepatectomy liver failure in the patients who underwent DHVE. The signal intensity ratio in the area of DHVE was lower than that in the areas of PVE and the remnant liver (p < 0.01). The degree of congestion and necrosis was greater in the area of DHVE than in the area of PVE alone (p < 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively). We observed good liver hypertrophy after DHVE and histological and radiological changes in the area of DHVE. Our findings provide a compelling rationale for further investigation of the mechanism of liver hypertrophy in DHVE.

Exploring the feasibility of robotic liver resection in a limited resource setting.

The transition from open hepatectomy to minimally invasive techniques has reduced morbidity and mortality. However, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) requires substantial expertise. Robotic liver resection (RLR) combines minimal invasiveness with open surgical precision. It may facilitate complex procedures without the learning required for LLR. We evaluated RLR outcomes in a limited resource setting and assessed its efficacy and practicality. This retrospective study analyzed 67 robotic hepatectomies conducted from 2020 to 2023. Demographic, perioperative factors, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Major hepatectomies were required in 46/67 (68.7%) patients who underwent RLR. No open conversions, 30-day mortalities, or readmissions occurred. Complications occurred in 7.4% of patients; major complications occurred in 5.9%. Learning curve analysis showed a negative correlation between operation sequence and operative time. Effective use of robotic technology combined with the expertise of well-trained surgeons facilitates successful execution of RLR with feasible surgical outcomes, even at smaller centers.

Impact of blood salvage therapy during oncologic liver surgeries on allogenic transfusion events, survival, and recurrence, an ambidirectional cohort study.

The use of autologous blood transfusions in oncologic surgeries is somewhat controversial due to the potential risk of disease dissemination through the salvage process. On the other hand, autologous blood transfusion can prevent the potential negative effects of allogenic blood transfusions and reduce use of valuable resources. This study included 106 adult patients who underwent oncologic liver surgery at our institution between December 2015 and June 2019. The patients were divided into two groups: the Cell Saver® group (operated between January 2018 and June 2019) and the control group (operated between December 2015 and December 2017). The Cell Saver® device was present in the operating room for the Cell Saver® group, and blood was re-transfused if a certain amount of blood loss occurred. Data analysis focused on outcomes such as blood transfusion requirements, overall survival, recurrence-free survival, hemoglobin levels, hospital stay, and complications. Patient records provided relevant information on demographics, surgery details, pathology, and outcomes for both groups. Autologous blood transfusion was found to reduce the amount of blood units needed (4.0 units (control group) versus 0.4 units (Cell Saver® group) P=0.029. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no difference for both overall survival 471.6 days (Cell Saver® group) versus 468.3 days (control group) (P=0.219) and 488.9 days (Cell Saver® group) versus 487.2 days (control group) (P=0.993) and disease-free survival (P=0.553) and (P=0.735) for primary hepatic tumours and hepatic metastasis respectively between the Cell Saver® and control groups. Overall survival regardless of the type of tumour was similar to the control group (485.4d vs. 481.9d) (P=0.503). Survival was significantly lower for minor hepatectomies (516.0d vs. 517.4d) (P=0.050) in the Cell Saver® group, major hepatectomies showed no difference in overall survival (470.2d vs. 466.4d) (P=0.868). No impact on disease recurrence was found between patients who received autologous blood transfusions versus those who did not. The use of Cell Saver® should not be avoided in oncologic surgeries of the liver. Use of Cell Saver® for major hepatectomies might be more beneficial as OS was significantly lower for the Cell Saver® group for patients who underwent minor hepactomies. Further research is needed to explain this conflicting result. Nonetheless, the use of Cell Saver® in autologous blood transfusions can reduce the use of valuable resources and the risks associated with allogenic blood transfusions.

Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes in Liver-First Approach: A Spanish Snapshot Study (the RENACI Project).

(1) Background: The liver-first approach may be indicated for colorectal cancer patients with synchronous liver metastases to whom preoperative chemotherapy opens a potential window in which liver resection may be undertaken. This study aims to present the data of feasibility and short-term outcomes in the liver-first approach. (2) Methods: A prospective observational study was performed in Spanish hospitals that had a medium/high-volume of HPB surgeries from 1 June 2019 to 31 August 2020. (3) Results: In total, 40 hospitals participated, including a total of 2288 hepatectomies, 1350 for colorectal liver metastases, 150 of them (11.1%) using the liver-first approach, 63 (42.0%) in hospitals performing <50 hepatectomies/year. The proportion of patients as ASA III was significantly higher in centers performing ≥50 hepatectomies/year (difference: 18.9%; p = 0.0213). In 81.1% of the cases, the primary tumor was in the rectum or sigmoid colon. In total, 40% of the patients underwent major hepatectomies. The surgical approach was open surgery in 87 (58.0%) patients. Resection margins were R0 in 78.5% of the patients. In total, 40 (26.7%) patients had complications after the liver resection and 36 (27.3%) had complications after the primary resection. One-hundred and thirty-two (89.3%) patients completed the therapeutic regime. (4) Conclusions: There were no differences in the surgical outcomes between the centers performing <50 and ≥50 hepatectomies/year. Further analysis evaluating factors associated with clinical outcomes and determining the best candidates for this approach will be subsequently conducted.

Evaluation of quality and quantity of randomized controlled trials in hepatobiliary surgery: A scoping/mapping review.

To evaluate the quantity and quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in hepatobiliary surgery and for identifying gaps in current evidences. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) for RCTs of hepatobiliary surgery published from inception until the end of 2023. The quality of each study was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool. The associations between risk of bias and the region and publication date were also assessed. Evidence mapping was performed to identify research gaps in the field. The study included 1187 records. The number and proportion of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in hepatobiliary surgery increased over time, from 13 RCTs (.0005% of publications) in 1970-1979 to 201 RCTs (.003% of publications) in 2020-2023. There was a significant increase in the number of studies with a low risk of bias in RoB domains (p < .01). The proportion of RCTs with low risk of bias improved significantly after the introduction of CONSORT guidelines (p < .001). The evidence mapping revealed a significant research focus on major and minor hepatectomy and cholecystectomy. However, gaps were identified in liver cyst surgery and hepatobiliary vascular surgery. Additionally, there are gaps in the field of perioperative management and nutrition intervention. The quantity and quality of RCTs in hepatobiliary surgery have increased over time, but there is still room for improvement. We have identified gaps in current research that can be addressed in future studies.

Impact of clinically relevant posthepatectomy liver failure predicted by preoperative evaluation of functional remnant hepatic reserve

Abstract Background: Few studies have investigated the remnant hepatic functional reserve before hepatectomy by calculating the functional remnant liver rate (RLR) using threedimensional computed tomography (3D-CT)/technetium-99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid galactosyl human serum albumin (99mTc-GSA) single-photon emission CT (SPECT) fusion imaging. We aimed to preoperatively evaluate the predictive value of functional remnant liver rate (RLR) and indocyanine green (ICG) disappearance rate (KICG) in determining the occurrence of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Summary of Background Data: The conventional method of volumetric rem-KICG calculated from remnant liver volume and the KICG is difficult to accurately reflect heterogenous remnant liver function. Methods: In total, 106 patients who underwent major hepatectomy were retrospectively analysed. Of these, 24 (22.6%) developed clinically relevant PHLF grades B/C. We examined the ICG retention rate at 15 min (ICGR15) and KICG and constructed a 3DCT/ 99mTc-GSA SPECT fusion image to calculate the volumetric RLR, functional RLR, volumetric rem-KICG, and functional rem-KICG. Results: The multivariate analysis showed functional rem-KICG as the strongest independent risk factor for PHLF grade B/C. The functional-to-volumetric RLR ratios in the patients with portal vein obstruction and/or tumor volume of ≥500 mL was significantly higher. The volumetric rem-KICG determined that hepatectomy was unsafe in 7 patients, whereas the functional rem-KICG determined that it was unsafe in 3 patients. Conclusions: Functional rem-KICG was more reliable than volumetric rem-KICG in predicting clinically relevant PHLF grade B/C, as the resected side’s hepatic status highly influenced the function of the remnant liver. This finding could lead to a wider application of this technique.

Minor hepatectomy combined with cholangioplasty and cholangiojejunostomy for Bismuth II hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundThe optimal surgical approach for Bismuth II hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) remains controversial. This study compared perioperative and oncological outcomes between minor and major hepatectomy. Materials and methodsOne hundred and seventeen patients with Bismuth II HCCA who underwent hepatectomy and cholangiojejunostomy between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively investigated. Propensity score matching created a cohort of 62 patients who underwent minor (n = 31) or major (n = 31) hepatectomy. Perioperative outcomes, complications, quality of life, and survival outcomes were compared between the groups. Continuous data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, categorical variables are presented as n (%). ResultsMinor hepatectomy had a significantly shorter operation time (245.42 ± 54.31 vs. 282.16 ± 66.65 min; P = 0.023), less intraoperative blood loss (194.19 ± 149.17 vs. 315.81 ± 256.80 mL; P = 0.022), a lower transfusion rate (4 vs. 11 patients; P = 0.038), more rapid bowel recovery (17.77 ± 10.00 vs. 24.94 ± 9.82 h; P = 0.005), and a lower incidence of liver failure (1 vs. 6 patients; P = 0.045). There were no significant between-group differences in wound infection, bile leak, bleeding, pulmonary infection, intra-abdominal fluid collection, and complication rates. Postoperative laboratory values, length of hospital stay, quality of life scores, 3-year overall survival (25.8 % vs. 22.6 %; P = 0.648), and 3-year disease-free survival (12.9 % vs. 16.1 %; P = 0.989) were comparable between the groups. ConclusionIn this propensity score-matched analysis, overall survival and disease-free survival were comparable between minor and major hepatectomy in selected patients with Bismuth II HCCA. Minor hepatectomy was associated with a shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less need for transfusion, more rapid bowel recovery, and a lower incidence of liver failure. Besides, this findings need confirmation in a large-scale, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial with longer-term follow-up.

Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal sparing liver resections for high tumour burden colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score matched analysis.

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has proved effective in the treatment of oligometastatic disease (1 or 2 colorectal liver metastases CRLM) with similar long-term outcomes and improved short-term results compared to open liver resection (OLR). Feasibility of parenchymal sparing LLR for high tumour burden diseases is largely unknown. Aim of the study was to compare short and long-term results of LLR and OLR in patients with ≥ 3 CRLM. Patients who underwent first LR of at least two different segments for ≥ 3 CRLM between 01/2012 and 12/2021 were analysed. Propensity score nearest-neighbour 1:1 matching was based on relevant prognostic factors. 277 out of 673 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria (47 LLR and 230 OLR). After match two balanced groups of 47 patients with a similar mean number of CRLM (5 in LLR vs 6.5 in OLR, p = 0.170) were analysed. The rate of major hepatectomy was similar between the two group (10.6% OLR vs. 12.8% LLR). Mortality (2.1% OLR vs 0 LLR) and overall morbidity rates (34% OLR vs 23.4% LLR) were comparable. Length of stay (LOS) was shorter in the LLR group (5 vs 9days, p = 0.001). No differences were observed in median overall (41.1months OLR vs median not reached LLR) and disease-free survival (18.3 OLR vs 27.9months LLR). Laparoscopic approach should be considered in selected patients scheduled to parenchymal sparing LR for high tumour burden disease as associated to shorter LOS and similar postoperative and long-term outcomes compared to the open approach.

Vena cava replacement and major hepatectomy for liver tumors: international multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Involvement of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and hepatic veins has been considered a relative contraindication to hepatic resection for primary and metastatic liver tumors. However, patients affected by tumors extending to the IVC have limited therapeutic options and suffer worsening of quality of life due to IVC compression. Cases of primary and metastatic liver tumors with vena cava infiltration from 10 international centers were collected (7 European, 1 US, 2 Brazilian, 1 Indian) were collected. Inclusion criteria for the study were major liver resection with concomitant vena cava replacement. Clinical data and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Thirty-six cases were finally included in the study. Median tumor max size was 98mm (range: 25-250). A biliary reconstruction was necessary in 28% of cases, while a vascular reconstruction other than vena cava in 34% of cases. Median operative time was 462min (range: 230-750), with 750 median ml of estimated blood loss and a median of one pRBC transfused intraoperatively (range: 0-27). Median ICU stay was 4 days (range: 1-30) with overall in-hospital stay of 15 days (range: 3-46), postoperative CCI score of 20.9 (range: 0-100), 12% incidence of PHLF grade B-C. Five patients died in a 90-days interval from surgery, one due to heart failure, one due to septic shock, and three due to multiorgan failure. With a median follow-up of 17 months (interquartile range: 11-37), the estimated 5 years overall survival was 48% (95% CI: 27-66%), and 5-year cumulative incidence of tumor recurrence was 55% (95% CI: 33-73%). Major liver resections with vena cava replacement can be performed with satisfactory results in expert HPB centers. This surgical strategy represents a feasible alternative for otherwise unresectable lesions and is associated with favorable prognosis compared to nonoperative management, especially in patients affected by intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

A meta-analysis between robotic hepatectomy and conventional open hepatectomy.

Current meta-analysis was performed to compare robotic hepatectomy (RH) with conventional open hepatectomy (OH) in terms of peri-operative and postoperative outcomes. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were all searched up for comparative studies between RH and OH. RevMan5.3 software and Stata 13.0 software were used for statistical analysis. Nineteen studies with 1747 patients who received RH and 23,633 patients who received OH were included. Pooled results indicated that patients who received RH were generally younger than those received OH (P < 0.00001). Moreover, RH was associated with longer operative time (P = 0.0002), less intraoperative hemorrhage (P < 0.0001), lower incidence of intraoperative transfusion (P = 0.003), lower incidence of postoperative any morbidity (P < 0.00001), postoperative major morbidity (P = 0.0001), mortalities with 90days after surgery (P < 0.0001), and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.00001). Comparable total hospital costs were acquired between RH and OH groups (P = 0.46). However, even at the premise of comparable R0 rate (P = 0.86), RH was associated with smaller resected tumor size (P < 0.00001). Major hepatectomy (P = 0.02) and right posterior hepatectomy (P = 0.0003) were less frequently performed in RH group. Finally, we concluded that RH was superior to OH in terms of peri-operative and postoperative outcomes. RH could lead to less intraoperative hemorrhage, less postoperative complications and an enhanced postoperative recovery. However, major hepatectomy and right posterior hepatectomy were still less frequently performed via robotic approach. Future more powerful well-designed studies are required for further exploration.

Prognostic factors associated with early recurrence following liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the 3rd most common malignancy with the liver being the most common site of metastases. The recurrence rate of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after liver resection (LR) is notably high, with an estimated 40% of patients experiencing recurrence within 6 months. In this context, we conducted a meta-analysis to synthesize and evaluate the reliability of evidence pertaining to prognostic factors associated with early recurrence (ER) in CRLM following LR.MethodsSystematic searches were conducted from the inception of databases to July 14, 2023, to identify studies reporting prognostic factors associated with ER. The Quality in Prognostic Factor Studies (QUIPS) tool was employed to assess risk-of-bias for included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed on these prognostic factors, summarized by forest plots. The grading of evidence was based on sample size, heterogeneity, and Egger’s P value.ResultsThe study included 24 investigations, comprising 12705 individuals, during an accrual period that extended from 2007 to 2023. In the evaluation of risk-of-bias, 22 studies were rated as low/moderate risk, while two studies were excluded because of high risk. Most of the studies used a postoperative interval of 6 months to define ER, with 30.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.1–36.4%) of the patients experiencing ER following LR. 21 studies were pooled for meta-analysis. High-quality evidence showed that poor differentiation of CRC, larger and bilobar-distributed liver metastases, major hepatectomy, positive surgical margins, and postoperative complications were associated with an elevated risk of ER. Additionally, moderate-quality evidence suggested that elevated levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA199), lymph node metastases (LNM) of CRC, and a higher number of liver metastases were risk factors for ER.ConclusionThis review has the potential to enhance the efficacy of surveillance strategies, refine prognostic assessments, and guide judicious treatment decisions for CRLM patients with high risk of ER. Additionally, it is essential to undertake well-designed prospective investigations to examine additional prognostic factors and develop salvage therapeutic approaches for ER of CRLM.

Sarcopenia does not affect liver regeneration and postoperative course after a major hepatectomy. A prospective study on 125 patients using CT volumetry and HIDA scintigraphy

Background & objectivesSarcopenia is a morbi-mortality risk factor in digestive surgery, though its impact after major hepatectomy (MH) remains unknown. This prospective pilot study investigated whether volume and function of a regenerating liver is influenced by body composition. MethodsFrom 2011 to 2016, 125 consecutive patients had computed tomography and 99mTc-labelled-mebrofenin SPECT-scintigraphy before and after MH at day 7 and 1 month for measurements of liver volumes and functions. L3 vertebra muscle mass identified sarcopenia. Primary endpoint was the impact of sarcopenia on regeneration capacities (i.e. volume/function changes and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) rate). Secondary endpoint was 3-month morbi-mortality. ResultsSarcopenic patients (SP; N = 69) were significantly older than non-sarcopenic (NSP), with lower BMI and more malignancies, but with comparable liver function/volume at baseline. Postoperatively, SP showed higher rates of ISGLS_PHLF (24.6 % vs 10.9 %; p = 0.05) but with comparable rates of severe morbidity (23.2 % vs 16.4 %; p = 0.35), overall (8.7 % vs 3.6 %; p = 0.3) and PHLF-related mortality (8,7 % vs 1.8 %; p = 0.075). After matching on the extent of resection or using propensity score, regeneration and PHLF rates were similar. ConclusionThis prospective study using first sequential SPECT-scintigraphy showed that sarcopenia by itself does not affect liver regeneration capacities and short-term postoperative course after MH.

The minimally invasive approach confers improved outcomes in frail cancer patients undergoing hepatectomy: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis

BackgroundMorbidity for liver resection has decreased, and frail patients are undergoing surgery. The effect of minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of MILR on the outcomes in frail patients. MethodsElective hepatectomies from the 2014-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hepatectomy-specific Participant User File were reviewed. The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) was used. It includes diabetes mellitus, hypertension, functional status, heart failure, and dyspnea. Patients were considered frail if their mFI-5 score was ≥2. ResultsA total of 3116 patients were included: 2117 (67.9%) in the minor hepatectomy group and 999 (32%) in the major hepatectomy group. There were 2254 open cases and 862 MILRs. Postoperatively, patients in the minor hepatectomy group who underwent MILR had lower rates of prolonged length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge, transfusion, major complications, and minor complications (P < .05). Postoperatively, patients in the major hepatectomy group who underwent MILR had lower rates of prolonged LOS and any complication (P < .05). In the minor hepatectomy group, MILR remained independently predictive of lower rates of prolonged LOS (odds ratio [OR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.28-0.42), nonhome discharge (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84), transfusion (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.96), major complication (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-1.00), and any complication (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.92). In the major hepatectomy group, MILR remained independently predictive of prolonged LOS (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.89). ConclusionMILR resulted in lower rates of complications in the minor hepatectomy group and shorter LOS in the major hepatectomy group. The minimally invasive approach to hepatectomy may benefit frail patients with cancer.