Abstract What are the most relevant diseases in a country? Which risk factors are the strongest contributors to disease and death? How is the impact of different diseases evolving over time, and how does it compare between countries and within subnational units? As the need for prioritising the use of available resources constantly increases, a timely, sound and comprehensive answer to these fundamental questions is more than ever needed to inform public health decision-making. Driven by the impact of the Global Burden of Disease study, several researchers and national and international health institutes have adopted the burden of disease approach to address these questions. The complexity of the burden of disease approach however resulted in major disparities in research capacity across Europe. Furthermore, the current burden of disease landscape remains scattered, and researchers struggle to translate their findings to decision makers. The European Burden of Disease Network (COST Action CA18218) addresses these challenges by acting as a technical platform for integrating and strengthening capacity in burden of disease assessment across Europe and beyond. The different activities of the Network have helped to improve the quality and comparability of burden of disease estimates and increase their use in policy and practice. However, still many challenges remain. As a way of looking into the future applications of the burden of disease metrics, the European Burden of Disease Network took the initiative of developing a research agenda based on barriers and weaknesses identified within the activities of the network and input from researchers working regularly with burden of disease. As an initial step, a series of systematic literature review was carried to identify barriers and weaknesses in the computation of burden of disease estimates. These highlighted the differences in methodological choices that could hamper the comparability of results. This point was later identified as a key element of future development (abstract one). Secondly, the members of the network were consulted. Online questionnaires and structured consultations led to the identification of four main pillars of the future research agenda: transparency and availability, refining current methods, new applications, and prioritization of topics. In this workshop, we will present different activities within and outside the Network that correspond to the four pillars above described (abstract 2-4) and start the reflection on the future of burden of disease estimated. Key messages • Despite the wide use of the burden of disease approach, many challenges were identified in the replication of the methods and the need for further developments. • A new research agenda for burden of disease estimates will formalize a way to strengthen methodologies, interpretations and applications.
Read full abstract