Objectives The purposes of this study is to use metaphor analysis to categorize how university students perceive the liberal arts, major, and extracurricular curriculum, and to derive the direction the university curriculum should pursue. Methods For this purpose, a metaphor analysis survey was conducted with 148 university students in Gyeonggi-do, and 130 valid questionnaires were analyzed, excluding those with unclear or insincere metaphors. To ensure the reliability of the categorization results, the data were evaluated through agreement among three evaluators majoring in curriculum studies. Results As a result of the study, the liberal arts curriculum was categorized into 10 themes: ‘free choice,’ ‘rest,’ ‘diversity,’ ‘learning,’ ‘basic,’ ‘growth,’ ‘supplement,’ ‘exchange,’ ‘newness,’ and ‘taste.’ The major curriculum was divided into 9 categories: ‘difficult,’ ‘ambivalent,’ ‘expansion of knowledge,’ ‘basic,’ ‘essential,’ ‘improvement of expertise,’ ‘career,’ ‘performance,’ and ‘interest.’ The extracurricular curriculum was classified into 7 categories: ‘unknown world,’ ‘rest,’ ‘help,’ ‘additional elements,’ ‘free choice,’ ‘harmony,’ and ‘challenge.’ Through these results, we were able to uncover the various perceptions university students have of the university curriculum. Conclusions Based on these results, the liberal arts curriculum was identified as a core competency based curriculum that provides not only basic knowledge but also various learning opportunities and free choices. The major curriculum was derived as a competency based curriculum focused on students' career preparation and professional development. Additionally, since the extracurricular curriculum complements the curricular learning and plays a crucial role in promoting the holistic growth of university students, it was concluded that it should be developed and operated in a way that offers diverse programs and meets the interests and needs of students. In this respect, this study is significant as it provides academic implications for improving the direction of university curriculum and its implementation.
Read full abstract