Poor crop establishment is a common problem in summer cropping regions. The physical environment predisposes seedbeds to high soil strength and temperature. It is frequently difficult, however, to determine the relative contributions of these stresses to emergence failure. Our capacity to determine the effect of soil strength is limited by: (a) a limited understanding of the effect of soil strength on pre-emergent shoot growth, and whether there is an interaction with soil temperature and (b) difficulty in measuring the mechanical stresses experienced by the pre-emergent seedling in a way that is applicable to a wide range of soils. We used a uniaxial compression cell to quantify the rate of shoot growth of maize as a function of soil strength (0 to 956 kPa), and to assess if temperature affected this relationship. Soil strength was calculated as spherical cavity expansion pressure, with field estimates taken from blunt penetrometer readings adjusted for soil friction. Coleoptile and first internode growth rates fell by more than 50% when strength increased from 0 to 118 kPa. By combining functions describing the strength dependence of shoot growth with functions developed previously to describe the temperature dependence of shoot growth, a model was developed to predict the response of shoot growth to strength at a range of temperatures. The model successfully predicted the outcomes of laboratory experiments where seedlings were grown at 118 kPa and exposed to diurnally varying temperatures in both the physiological temperature range (10–40°C) and at supra-maximum temperatures (> 40° C). This suggested that at low soil strengths, temperature did not interfere with the shoot growth response to strength. However, when seedbed strength increased to 174 kPa, and seedlings were exposed to supra-maximum temperatures, the model significantly overestimated first internode growth, suggesting that high temperature stress had reduced the expansion pressure of the first internode. Maize shoot growth in the laboratory was more than five times as sensitive to cavity expansion pressure, than in field measurements. One factor which may have contributed to this is the increase in second node width in response to high temperature and/or high strength. As a result, the theoretical analysis used may have underestimated the mechanical forces imposed on the elongating shoot.
Read full abstract