Magnifying Narrow-band Imaging Research Articles

296. CLINICAL T1B-SM2-3N0M0 ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

Abstract Background With advancements in endoscopic techniques, safer and more reliable endoscopic resection of submucosal invasive lesions has become feasible. The evaluation of treatment outcomes for superficial esophageal carcinoma has typically been predicated on the depth of pathological diagnosis; however, there have been limited studies based on preoperative diagnosis. Given that treatment decisions in clinical practice are primarily guided by preoperative diagnosis, there is a heightened emphasis on studies grounded in preoperative assessments. This study aims to analyze the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of T1b-SM2-3 N0M0, evaluate the accuracy of treatment selection and depth diagnosis, and assess long-term outcomes based on these determinations. Methods Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with T1b-SM2-3 N0M0 between April 2010 and December 2020 were included in the study. Depth diagnosis was determined through endoscopic evaluation utilizing white light, NBI, NBI magnification plus EUS, with lymph node metastasis diagnosis performed via CT imaging. Treatment decisions were made following patient consent, and long-term prognosis was assessed for each treatment modality. Results Initial treatment involved ESD in 14 patients, with an additional 5 patients undergoing additional treatment (ESD + AD) based on histological evaluation (surgery: 1, CRT: 4). Surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery was performed in 15 patients, with CRT administered in 7. Among the 22 patients who did not receive NAC and whose histologic depth was evaluable, the accuracy rate of depth diagnosis was 64%, primarily attributable to overdiagnosis. In the 14 patients who underwent ESD excluding piecemeal resection, the negative rate of vertical margins was 93%. Five-year overall survival rates were as follows: ESD: 64.8%, ESD+AD: 75%, surgery: 86.2%, and CRT: 45.7%, with no statistically significant differences observed. The majority of deaths (83%) were attributed to other diseases or cancers, with only 2 deaths attributed to the primary disease. Conclusion ESD or surgery emerged as the preferred treatment modalities in the majority of cases, with relatively favorable long-term prognoses. Treatment decisions were influenced by comorbidities and other factors, potentially impacting long-term outcomes.

Endoscopic Diagnosis of Epithelial Subtypes of Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors using Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging

Introduction: Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) include low-grade adenoma (LGA) and high-grade adenoma or carcinoma (HGA/Ca) and are classified into two different epithelial subtypes, gastric-type (G-type) and intestinal-type (I-type). We attempted to distinguish them by endoscopic characteristics including magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI). Methods: Various endoscopic and M-NBI findings of 286 SNADETs were retrospectively reviewed and compared between G- and I-types and histological grades. M-NBI findings were divided into four patterns based on the following vascular patterns; absent, network, intrastructural vascular (ISV), and unclassified. Lesions displaying a single pattern were classified as mono-pattern and those displaying multiple patterns as mixed-pattern. Lesions showing CDX2 positivity were categorized as I-types and those showing MUC5AC or MUC6 positivity were categorized as G-types based on immunohistochemistry. Results: Among 286 lesions, 23 (8%) were G-type and 243 (85%) were I-type. More G-type lesions were located oral to papilla (91.3 vs. 45.6%, p < 0.001), and had protruding morphology compared to those of I-types (65.2 vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001). The major M-NBI pattern was ISV in G-type (78.2 vs. 26.3%, p < 0.001), and absent for I-type (0 vs. 34.5%, p = 0.003). Three endoscopic characteristics; location oral to papilla, protruding morphology, and major M-NBI pattern (ISV) were independent predictors for G-type. Mixed-pattern was more common in HGA/Ca than LGA for I-type (77.0 vs. 58.8%, p = 0.01); however, there was no difference for those in G-type. Conclusion: Endoscopic findings including M-NBI are useful to differentiate epithelial subtypes.

Routine image-enhanced endoscopic surveillance for metachronous esophageal squamous cell neoplasms in head and neck cancer patients.

Esophageal squamous cell neoplasms (ESCNs) are common second primary tumors in patients with head and neck cancer. Image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) with Lugol chromoendoscopy or magnifying narrow-band imaging both increase the detection of early ESCNs. No evidence-based ESCN surveillance program for head and neck cancer patients without a history of synchronous ESCNs exists. We aimed to evaluate the performance of an IEE surveillance program with magnifying narrow-band imaging endoscopy and Lugol chromoendoscopy. From April 2016, we routinely used IEE with magnifying narrow-band imaging and Lugol chromoendoscopy to evaluate patients with head and neck cancer history. All patients who were negative for ESCNs at the first surveillance endoscopy and received at least 2 IEEs through December 2019 were included. Demographic profiles, clinical data, cancer characteristics, IEE results and pathology reports were analyzed. A total of 178 patients were included. Only 4 patients (2.2%) developed metachronous ESCNs during follow-up, all of whom received curative resection treatment. The interval for the development of metachronous ESCNs was 477 to 717 days. In multivariate Firth logistic regression and Kaplan‒Meier survival curve analysis, Lugol's voiding lesion type C had an increased risk of esophageal cancer development (adjusted odds ratio = 15.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-185.87, p = 0.029). Eight patients died during the study period, and none of them had metachronous ESCNs. IEE with magnifying narrow-band imaging and Lugol chromoendoscopy is an effective surveillance program in head and neck cancer patients without a history of ESCNs. Annual surveillance can timely detect early ESCNs with low ESCN-related mortality.

Advantage of magnifying narrow-band imaging for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia associated with sessile serrated lesions.

This study aimed to extract endoscopic findings for diagnosing colorectal neoplasia associated with sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), which are of significant interest. To compare the magnifying narrow-band imaging (NBI) findings with microscopic morphology, we classified SSLs into two groups: Group A SSLs included the majority of uniform SSLs and any dysplasia other than that classified as group B SSLs. Group B SSLs included SSLs with intramucosal and invasive carcinoma. We also quantitatively assessed visible vessels using ImageJ software. This study included 47 patients with 50 group B SSLs who underwent endoscopic resection between 2012 and 2020. The results were retrospectively compared with those of 237 patients with 311 group A SSLs that underwent endoscopic resection. Using conventional white-light endoscopy, significantly more group B SSLs had uneven shapes and some reddening compared to group A SSLs. The diagnostic odds ratios for group B SSLs were as follows: lesions with a diameter ≥10 mm, 9.76; uneven shape, 3.79; reddening, 15.46; and visible vessels with NBI, 11.32. Regarding visible vessels with NBI, the specificity and diagnostic accuracy for group B SSLs were 94.9% and 93.1%, respectively. The percentage of the vascular tonal area of NBI images was significantly larger for group B SSLs than for group A SSLs (3.97% vs. 0.29%; p < 0.01). SSLs with reddening and/or a diameter ≥10 mm are suspected to contain cancerous components. Moreover, visible vessels observed using magnifying NBI can serve as objective indicators for diagnosing SSLs with cancerous components with a high degree of accuracy.

Validity of low-magnification narrow-band imaging in annual endoscopy screening for gastric neoplasms: A case-control study

Previously, I have reported the efficacy of whole stomach observation using magnifying narrow-band imaging at low magnification (LM-NBI) after routine white-light imaging (WLI). LM-NBI can detect lesions overlooked by WLI. However, the effectiveness of annual examinations remains unexplored. I conducted this case-control study at a single institution. In LM-NBI group, patients with chronic gastritis underwent a LM-NBI scan, defined as the minimal magnification offering maximal visual field coverage to unveil to the microsurface pattern of gastric mucosa, of the whole stomach following WLI. Historical control was used as the conventional magnifying endoscopy (CE) group. In both groups, index endoscopy, which equalizes the status, was performed first, and subsequently annually endoscopies up to five times were conducted. The first annual examination was performed from April 2019 to March 2020 in LM-NBI group and from April 2015 to March 2016 in CE group. The detection of gastric neoplasia was analyzed according to medical records. Among 388 patients in the LM-NBI group, and 381 in the CE group, 15 and 5 patients with gastric neoplasia were respectively identified. Except for one mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, all were epithelial neoplasias. All endoscopic examinations were performed safely without complications which needed additional medical interventions. Through a Cox proportional hazards model, the hazard ratio of 2.78 (95% CE, 1.01–7.64) was determined. Kaplan–Meier analysis (p ​= ​0.039, log-rank test) revealed superior efficacy of annual LM-NBI over CE in detecting gastric neoplasia. This is the first study to report the efficacy of annual endoscopy using LM-NBI.

Gastrointestinal: Peutz-Jeghers syndrome with a novel frameshift mutation in STK 11 gene observed by magnifying narrowband imaging endoscopy.

Gastrointestinal: Peutz-Jeghers syndrome with a novel frameshift mutation in STK 11 gene observed by magnifying narrowband imaging endoscopy.

Microarchitectures of Barrett's esophagus associated with DNA methylation status.

Aim: DNA methylation is involved in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and Barrett's esophagus (BE). Microarchitectures of on-neoplastic BE associated with DNA methylation status were examined using magnifying narrow-band imaging (NBI) endoscopy. Patients and methods: Using biopsies from non-neoplastic BE without cancer (n=66; N group), with EAC (n=27; ADJ group) and EAC tissue (n=22; T group), methylation of N33, DPYS, SLC16A12, miR124a3 andmiR34bc genes were quantified. MagnifyingNBI features of non-neoplastic BE were classified according to their morphologies. Results: TheADJ and T groups presented higher DNA methylation compared with theN group. Magnifying NBI endoscopic features of non-neoplastic BE also correlated with DNA methylation as an independent factor. Conclusion: Microarchitectures of BE visualized by magnifying NBI endoscopy correlated with DNA methylation.

Microvessel findings of invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas observed using the magnifying narrow-band imaging system

Microvessel findings of invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas observed using the magnifying narrow-band imaging system

A114 UNIFIED MAGNIFYING ENDOSCOPIC CLASSIFICATION (UMEC) FOR GASTROINTESTINAL LESIONS: A NORTH AMERICAN EDUCATION STUDY

Abstract Background Magnification endoscopy and magnification narrow-band imaging are image enhanced endoscopy technologies that may allow for the diagnosis of advanced neoplasia in the GI tract on the basis of imaging characteristics. Recently, the Unified Magnifying Endoscopic Classification (UMEC) has been developed, which unified the criteria for the esophagus, stomach, and colon. UMEC divides optical diagnosis into one of the three categories: non-neoplastic, intramucosal neoplasia, and deep submucosal invasive cancer. Purpose The objective of this study is to educate North American endoscopists on the use of the UMEC schema, and to ascertain performance of the UMEC framework among North American endoscopists. Method Using UMEC, five North American endoscopists (&amp;gt;1000 procedures) without prior training in magnifying endoscopy independently diagnosed previously collected endoscopic image set of the esophagus, stomach, and colon. The endoscopists were trained on the use of UMEC via an eleven-minute training video with exemplars of each element of UMEC from esophagus, stomach, and colon. All endoscopists were blinded to white-light and non-magnifying NBI findings as well as histopathological diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of UMEC was assessed while using the gold standard histopathology as a reference. Result(s) A total of 299 gastrointestinal lesions (77 esophagus, 92 stomach, and 130 colon) were assessed using UMEC. For esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for all 5 endoscopists ranged from 65.2% (95% CI: 50.9–77.9) to 87.0% (95% CI: 75.3–94.6), 77.4% (95% CI: 60.9–89.6) to 96.8% (95% CI: 86.8–99.8), and 75.3% to 87.0%, respectively. For gastric adenocarcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for all 5 endoscopists ranged from 94.9% (95% CI: 85.0–99.1) to 100%, 52.9% (95% CI: 39.4–66.2) to 92.2% (95% CI: 82.7–97.5), and 73.3% to 93.3%, respectively. For colorectal adenocarcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for all 5 endoscopists ranged from 76.2% (95% CI: 62.0–87.3) to 83.3% (95% CI: 70.3–92.5), 89.7% (95% CI: 82.1–94.9) to 97.7% (95% CI: 93.1–99.6), and 86.8% to 90.7%, respectively. Image Conclusion(s) UMEC is a simple and practical classification that can be used to introduce and educate endoscopists to magnification narrow-band imaging and optical diagnosis. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below CAG Disclosure of Interest M. R. A. Fujiyoshi Grant / Research support from: 2022 CAG/AbbVie Education Research Grant, Y. Fujiyoshi: None Declared, N. Gimpaya: None Declared, R. Bechara: None Declared, T. Jeyalingam: None Declared, N. Calo: None Declared, N. Forbes: None Declared, R. Khan: None Declared, M. Atalla: None Declared, A. Toshimori: None Declared, Y. Shimamura: None Declared, M. Tanabe: None Declared, J. Mosko: None Declared, H. Inoue: None Declared, S. Grover: None Declared

Diagnostic Value of Adding Magnifying Chromoendoscopy to Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging Endoscopy for Colorectal Polyps

This study examined the additional value of magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) on magnifying narrow-band imaging endoscopy (M-NBI) in the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps. A multicenter prospective study was conducted at 9 facilities in Japan and Germany. Patients with colorectal polyps scheduled for resection were included. Optical diagnosis was performed by M-NBI first, followed by MCE. Both diagnoses were made in real time. MCE was performed on all type 2B lesions classified according to the Japan NBI Expert Team classification and other lesions at the discretion of endoscopists. The diagnostic accuracy and confidence of M-NBI and MCE for colorectal cancer (CRC) with deep invasion (≥T1b) were compared on the basis of histologic findings after resection. In total, 1173 lesions were included between February 2018 and December 2020, with 654 (5 hyperplastic polyp/sessile serrated lesion, 162 low-grade dysplasia, 403 high-grade dysplasia, 97 T1 CRCs, and 32 ≥T2 CRCs) examined using MCE after M-NBI. In the diagnostic accuracy for predicting CRC with deep invasion, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for M-NBI were 63.1%, 94.2%, 61.6%, 94.5%, and 90.2%, respectively, and for MCE they were 77.4%, 93.2%, 62.5%, 96.5%, and 91.1%, respectively. The sensitivity was significantly higher in MCE (P < .001). However, these additional values were limited to lesions with low confidence in M-NBI or the ones diagnosed as ≥T1b CRC by M-NBI. In this multicenter prospective study, we demonstrated the additional value of MCE on M-NBI. We suggest that additional MCE be recommended for lesions with low confidence or the ones diagnosed as ≥T1b CRC. Trials registry number: UMIN000031129.

A Multicenter Prospective Validation Study on Selective Endoscopic Resection of Sessile Serrated Lesions Using Magnifying Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice

Introduction: Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) have malignant potential for colorectal cancer in the serrated pathway. Selective endoscopic resection of SSLs would reduce medical costs and procedure-related accidents, but the accurate endoscopic differentiation of SSLs from hyperplastic polyps (HPs) is challenging. To explore the differential diagnostic performance of magnifying colonoscopy in distinguishing SSLs from HPs, we conducted a multicenter prospective validation study in clinical practice. Methods: Considering the rarity of diminutive SSLs, all lesions ≥6 mm that were detected during colonoscopy and diagnosed as type 1 based on the Japan narrow-band imaging expert team (JNET) classification were included in this study. Twenty expert endoscopists were asked to differentiate between SSLs and HPs with high or low confidence level after conventional and magnifying NBI observation. To examine the validity of selective endoscopic resection of SSLs using magnifying colonoscopy in clinical practice, we calculated the sensitivity of endoscopic diagnosis of SSLs with histopathological findings as comparable reference. Results: A total of 217 JNET type 1 lesions from 162 patients were analyzed, and 114 lesions were diagnosed with high confidence. The sensitivity of magnifying colonoscopy in detecting SSLs was 79.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74.7–84.4%) overall, and 82.4% (95% CI: 76.1–87.7%) in the high-confidence group. These results showed that the sensitivity of this study was not high enough, even limited in the high-confidence group. Conclusions: Accurate differential diagnosis of SSLs and HPs using magnifying colonoscopy was challenging even for experts. JNET type 1 lesions ≥6 mm are recommended to be resected because selective endoscopic resection has a disadvantage of leaving approximately 20% of SSLs on site.

Image-enhanced endoscopy for real-time differentiation between hyperplastic and fundic gland polyps in the stomach.

Fundic gland polyps (FGP) of stomach are benign, while some hyperplastic polyps (HP) may harbor dysplasia or malignancy. Conventional white light endoscopy (WLE) cannot reliably distinguish FGP from HP. We investigated the role of image-enhanced endoscopy in differentiating FGP from HP. Patients with gastric polyps were recruited prospectively. The characteristics of the polyps were assessed using WLE and magnification narrow band imaging (mNBI). The microsurface, intervening space (IS), and microvascular (V) features of polyps were evaluated on mNBI. The pattern characteristic of FGP and HP were determined. Histopathology of polyps was the gold standard for diagnosis. Finally, in the validation phase, five endoscopists applied the characteristic features identified in this study to predict the type of gastric polyp and their performance was assessed. Forty-five patients with a total of 70 gastric polyps (HP-46, FGP-24) were included in this study. On mNBI, the pattern characteristic of HP included peripheral curved type of white structures forming large circular/villous loops (microsurface), enlarged intervening space, and microvessels appearing as dark patches in the intervening space (p<0.001 vs. FGP). These were noted in 95.7% HP. In contrast, 95.8% FGP had a pattern characterized by dotted/elliptical/tubular white structures (microsurface), normal width of intervening space, and microvessels surrounding the white structures in a network pattern. This IS-V pattern classification had an accuracy of >90% in the validation phase with intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.95. The accuracy of mNBI was higher than WLE (97.1% vs. 67%) in predicting the type of gastric polyp. Image-enhanced endoscopy with mNBI (IS-V pattern) performs very well in differentiating HP from FGP.

Early gastric mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms with endoscopic findings of neuroendocrine cell carcinoma components exposed on the mucosal surface: a case report

BackgroundGastric mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms are rare malignant tumors. The lack of specific findings makes it difficult to diagnose endoscopically. We report the case of early gastric mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection.Case presentationAn 81-year-old Japanese female underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy for screening and was treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Histopathologically, the lesion was diagnosed as mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (tubular adenocarcinoma 2 60%, endocrine cell carcinoma 40%), pT1b(submucosa (SM) 900 μm), pUL(−), Ly(+), v(−), pHM0, pVM0. After additional surgical resection without adjuvant chemotherapy, she has had no recurrences or metastases for 3 years.ConclusionsComparing narrow-band imaging magnified endoscopic findings with pathological findings, the depressed area with a lack of surface structure was consistent with the neuroendocrine cell carcinoma component, while narrow-band imaging magnification findings showed non-network vessels. In this case, we examined endoscopic findings of early stage mixed neuroendocrine—non-neuroendocrine neoplasms in detail and compared it with the pathological findings. We believe that these endoscopic findings contribute to the diagnosis of mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms and can lead to its early detection.

Advanced Endoscopy for Benign Esophageal Disease: A Review Focused on Non-Erosive Reflux Disease and Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Advanced endoscopy (AVE) techniques include image-enhanced endoscopy methods, such as narrow-band imaging (NBI), and types of microscopic endoscopy, such as endocytoscopy. In the esophagus, AVE first showed diagnostic utility in the diagnosis of superficial esophageal cancer and was then applied to inflammatory disease. This review focuses on non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), which sometimes show no abnormal findings on standard white light endoscopy alone. Studies have demonstrated that advanced endoscopy, including NBI magnification endoscopy and endocytoscopy, improved the diagnostic performance of white-light endoscopy alone for NERD and EoE. In this review, we explain why advanced endoscopy is needed for the diagnosis of these esophageal inflammatory diseases, summarize the study results, and discuss future perspectives.

Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging with Acetic Acid Spray for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors Based on the Mucin Phenotype

Introduction: This study aimed to identify the characteristics of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) based on the mucin phenotype using magnifying narrow-band imaging with acetic acid spray (MA-NBI) and evaluate the efficacy of MA-NBI in differentiating gastric-type (G-type) from intestinal-type (I-type) lesions. Methods: We retrospectively identified 59 resected SNADETs in 59 patients who underwent MA-NBI. We evaluated surface patterns using MA-NBI to differentiate G-type from I-type lesions. Surface structures were classified into three patterns: tubular, villous, or oval structures. Lesions displaying a single pattern among the three patterns were classified as monotype, whereas those displaying multiple surface patterns were classified as mixed type. In addition, lesions with disorganized and unclear structures with irregular margins were classified as irregular surface structures. Results: In total, 32 (54%), 26 (44%), and 1 (2%) lesions were classified as Vienna category 3, 4, and 5 tumors, respectively, whereas 49 (83%) and 10 (17%) were classified as I- and G-type lesions, respectively. Oval structures were more frequently observed in G-type lesions (70%), whereas tubular structures were more frequently observed in I-type lesions (78%) (p < 0.001). Category 4 and 5 lesions had significantly higher mixed and irregular surface structure rates than category 3 lesions (41 vs. 6%, p = 0.003 and 81 vs. 3%, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: MA-NBI can distinguish the mucin phenotypes of SNADETs and may facilitate histological grade diagnosis.

Demarcation Line Determination for Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer Disease Range Using Unsupervised Machine Learning in Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging.

Background and Aims: It is important to determine an accurate demarcation line (DL) between the cancerous lesions and background mucosa in magnifying narrow-band imaging (M-NBI)-based diagnosis. However, it is difficult for novice endoscopists. We aimed to automatically determine the accurate DL using a machine learning method. Methods: We used an unsupervised machine learning approach to determine the DLs. Our method consists of the following four steps: (1) an M-NBI image is segmented into superpixels using simple linear iterative clustering; (2) the image features are extracted for each superpixel; (3) the superpixels are grouped into several clusters using the k-means method; and (4) the boundaries of the clusters are extracted as DL candidates. The 23 M-NBI images of 11 cases were used for performance evaluation. The evaluation investigated the similarity of the DLs identified by endoscopists and our method, and the Euclidean distance between the two DLs was calculated. For the single case of 11 cases, the histopathological examination was also conducted to evaluate the proposed system. Results: The average Euclidean distances for the 11 cases were 10.65, 11.97, 7.82, 8.46, 8.59, 9.72, 12.20, 9.06, 22.86, 8.45, and 25.36. The results indicated that the proposed method could identify similar DLs to those identified by experienced doctors. Additionally, it was confirmed that the proposed system could generate pathologically valid DLs by increasing the number of clusters. Conclusions: Our proposed system can support the training of inexperienced doctors as well as enrich the knowledge of experienced doctors in endoscopy.

Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy versus White-Light Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Predicting and Collecting Residual Cancer Tissue in Patients with Gastric Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy

Simple SummaryCollecting appropriate gastric cancer (GC) tissues is critical for molecular biology research or the development of new target drugs for cases resistant to chemotherapy. Chemotherapy may reduce or alter the distribution of GC tissue on the surface, making the detection of GC tissue during upper endoscopy challenging. Our study showed that probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is superior to white-light endoscopy (WLE) with magnifying narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) in terms of accuracy for diagnosing residual cancer in GC patients receiving chemotherapy. pCLE might be considered when it is necessary to confirm the presence of residual cancer and get tissue samples from GC patients receiving chemotherapy.In cases of progression despite chemotherapy, collecting gastric cancer (GC) tissues might be helpful for molecular biology research or the development of new target drugs for treating cases that are refractory to chemotherapy. Chemotherapy, however, may reduce or alter the distribution of GC tissue on the surface, making the detection of GC tissue during upper endoscopy challenging. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is a new technology that enables histological diagnosis by magnifying the mucous membrane to a microscopic level. Here, we evaluated whether pCLE could increase the yield of endoscopic biopsy for GC compared to white-light endoscopy (WLE) with magnifying narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) in GC patients receiving chemotherapy with its powerful imaging technique. Patients underwent WLE/M-NBI and pCLE for the detection of residual GC for the purpose of response evaluation or clinical trial registration. After WLE/M-NBI and pCLE, each residual GC lesion was biopsied for histological analysis. A total of 23 patients were enrolled between January 2018 and June 2020. Overall, pCLE showed significantly higher sensitivity and negative predictive value than WLE/M-NBI. The accuracy of pCLE was superior to that of WLE/M-NBI. Moreover, pCLE showed better predictive ability for residual GC than WLE/M-NBI, while WLE/M-NBI and pCLE showed inconsistent results. pCLE diagnosed residual GC more accurately than WLE/M-NBI, which resulted in an increased number of GC tissues collected during the endoscopic biopsy.

Low-magnification narrow-band imaging for small gastric neoplasm detection on screening endoscopy.

Background and AimsMicrosurface patterns of the gastric mucosa can be observed using magnifying narrow-band imaging (M-NBI). However, the efficacy of M-NBI at low-magnification (LM-NBI) screening for detecting small gastric neoplasms is unclear.MethodsThis prospective study was conducted at a single institution. LM-NBI, defined as minimal magnification that could reveal the microsurface pattern of the gastric mucosa, was performed after routine white-light imaging (WLI) observation of the stomach. Depending on the phase in which the neoplastic lesions were initially found, they were divided into the WLI group and the LM-NBI group, and the characteristics of these neoplastic lesions were investigated accordingly.ResultsSixty-five epithelial lesions (adenomas or noninvasive carcinomas) of 20 mm or less in diameter were identified in this study. Sixteen lesions were detected only with LM-NBI. Smaller lesions were detected using LM-NBI (P = .01). WLI took about 160 to 260 seconds, while LM-NBI required about 70 to 80 seconds. All lesions in the LM-NBI group had a background of map-like redness (n = 5) or atrophic/metaplastic mucosa (n = 11).ConclusionsLM-NBI was able to detect lesions overlooked by WLI, especially those in areas of map-like redness or atrophic/metaplastic mucosa of the stomach. Approximately one-quarter of newly diagnosed neoplasms were retrieved on routine examination during an extra 1.5 minutes.

Rectal Condyloma Acuminatum

A woman between 70 and 80 years of age with a history of cervical cancer presented with changes in bowel habit. The patient took prednisolone for cardiac sarcoidosis. Colonoscopy revealed a 20-mm flat, whitish lesion with diffuse reddish speckles in the lower rectum (Figure 1). Based on the medical history and endoscopic findings, we suspected rectal condyloma acuminatum. However, biopsy results could not provide a definitive diagnosis; thus, we performed endoscopic submucosal dissection for excisional biopsy. The resected specimen revealed squamous epithelial cells with vacuolated cytoplasm (Figure 2). P16 staining, a marker of human papillomavirus infection, was diffusely stained. A final diagnosis of condyloma acuminatum was made. The patient was discharged uneventfully. No recurrence was observed 8 months after treatment.Figure 2Resected specimen showing squamous cells with vacuolated cytoplasm.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) Condyloma acuminatum, a relatively common disease especially in young adults, has an annual incidence ranging from 160 to 289 per 100,000 individuals.1Patel H. Wagner M. Singhal P. Kothari S. Systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of genital warts.BMC Infect Dis. 2013; 13: 39Crossref PubMed Scopus (230) Google Scholar Condyloma acuminatum is a viral wart caused by human papillomavirus infection and can also be observed in immunocompromised patients, such as those taking immunosuppressive agents. Generally, condyloma acuminatum is detected in the perineum, labia, vagina, penis, perianal area, and anal canal. However, it rarely crosses the dentate line to grow into the rectum. Condyloma acuminatum has malignant potential, often developing into atypical epithelium or carcinoma; thus, surgical resection is the first-line treatment. However, recent reports have shown the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection as a curative, minimally invasive option.2Matsumoto K. Sakamoto N. Murakami T. et al.Long-term relapse-free treatment with endoscopic submucosal dissection combined with magnifying narrow-band imaging for a pregnant patient with flat-type condyloma acuminatum: a case report.Clin J Gastroenterol. 2021; 14: 439-445Crossref Scopus (2) Google Scholar There is no consensus on surveillance of rectal condyloma acuminatum; thus, it is reasonable to apply the surveillance recommendations for anal condyloma acuminatum, with follow-ups every 6 to 12 months.3Long K.C. Menon R. Bastawrous A. Billingham R. Screening, surveillance, and treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia.Clin Colon Rect Surg. 2016; 29: 57-64Crossref Scopus (30) Google Scholar The authors report no potential competing interests.

Visualization of Absorbed Lipid in the Normal Duodenal Epithelium Using Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging.

Subepithelial microvascular pattern cannot be visualized on the surface of adenoma and carcinoma by magnifying endoscopy due to a white opaque substance (WOS), which consists of minute lipid droplets accumulated in the neoplastic epithelium. We aimed to investigate whether the WOS is visualized in the duodenum after exogenous fat loading (FL) administration in an open-label, randomized, controlled study. The patients scheduled to undergo endoscopic therapy for gastric epithelial neoplasms were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to the FL or non-FL group. An initial (before FL administration) and follow-up (after two to three weeks) endoscopic examinations were conducted to observe the duodenal mucosa using magnifying narrow-band imaging. Each patient in the FL group consumed 250ml of Ensure H® four hours before the follow-up examination. Two experienced endoscopists determined the grade of the WOS. FL test results were judged positive for patients who showed a higher grade at the follow-up examination than at the initial examination. The rate of positive test results was compared between the two groups. Twenty patients (10 in the FL and 10 in the non-FL groups) were included. FL test results were positive for all 10 patients in the FL group, while they were negative for all 10 patients in the non-FL group (P < 0.001 by Fisher's exact test). Lipids loaded onto normal duodenal epithelium were absorbed, and the absorbed lipid droplets appeared as WOS on magnifying narrow-band imaging.