Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biopsy Research Articles

Personalized Dynamic Prediction Model for Biopsy Timing in Patients With Prostate Cancer During Active Surveillance

Active surveillance (AS) for patients with prostate cancer (PC) often includes fixed repeat prostate biopsies that do not account for the varying risk of reclassification to significant disease. Given the invasive nature and potential complications of biopsies, a personalized approach is needed to balance the burden of biopsies with the risk of missing disease progression. To develop and externally validate a dynamic model that predicts an individual's risk of PC reclassification during AS. This prognostic study developed a dynamic prediction model using data from the Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) study, which was initiated in 2006. Follow-up was truncated until April 2023. External validation was conducted using cohorts from the world's largest centralized AS database, the Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance initiative database. The PRIAS study is a multicenter, prospective, web-based cohort study monitoring patients undergoing AS, involving more than 175 academic, nonacademic, and private centers across 23 countries worldwide. For the development and external validation of the model, all patients diagnosed with Grade Group 1 PC who underwent at least 1 baseline or follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 1 follow-up biopsy were included. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to January 2024. AS, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests, MRI, and prostate biopsies according to a fixed follow-up schedule. A joint model for longitudinal and time-to-event data was used to predict reclassification to Grade Group 2 or greater on repeat biopsy using predefined baseline and repeated clinical characteristics. Performance was assessed using time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and negative predictive value. The development cohort included 2512 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [59-69] years). Characteristics significantly associated with a higher risk of reclassification were increased age, higher PSA and velocity, lower prostate volume, a suspicious lesion on MRI, and no previous negative biopsy findings. Depending on the threshold and time point used, the model demonstrated a negative predictive value of 86% to 97%. External validation included 3199 patients from 9 other cohorts. The time-dependent area under the curve ranged from 0.81 to 0.84 in the development cohort and 0.52 to 0.90 at external validation. In this prognostic study, the developed dynamic risk model effectively identified patients at low risk of PC reclassification during AS. After prospective validation, this model may support personalized, risk-based AS and reduce the burden of unnecessary biopsies.

The dilemma of mediastinal lymphadenopathy between invasive and non-invasive procedures: ROC analysis of T2WI and DWI-MRI advanced parameters correlated with PET-CT and biopsy

BackgroundThe characterization of pathologically enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes is clinically essential for effective disease management and accurate prognosis. Malignancy (metastases and lymphoma) and granulomatous conditions (sarcoidosis and tuberculosis) are the most common causes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a good modality to characterize the mediastinal pathologically enlarged lymph nodes based on the excellent soft tissue contrast. It can save high-risk patients from radiation exposure and hazards of intervention such as general anesthesia and biopsy.Aim of the workTo estimate the accuracy of different advanced MRI quantitative parameters in the differentiation between benign and malignant mediastinal lymphadenopathy. This would involve the lesion-to-cord signal intensity ratio (SIR) in the T2-WI and diffusion weighted image (DWI), the lesion-to-chest wall muscle SIR in T2-WI and DWI, and the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. These values would be correlated with the prospective pathological data and the results of the positron emission tomography (PET-CT).ResultsProspectively, the study was conducted during the period between June 2022 and September 2023 on 45 patients with indeterminate or suspicious mediastinal lymphadenopathy identified by CT. MRI examination, PET-CT, and biopsy were applied for all patients. The intra-class correlation coefficient ranged between 0.89 and 0.95. (A) The lesion-to-cord SIR in T2-WI in the malignant group (1.49 ± 0.30) was higher than that in the benign group (0.83 ± 0.24) with P < 0.001. The statistically calculated cutoff value (> 1.2) estimated 90% sensitivity, 100% specificity, with AUC = 0.989. (B) The lesion-to-chest wall muscle SIR in T2-WI in malignant nodes (3.13 ± 0.84) was significantly higher than that in the benign nodes (1.90 ± 0.80) with P < 0.001. The statistically calculated cutoff value (> 2.4) estimated 86.67% sensitivity, 86.67% specificity, with AUC = 0.88. (C) The lesion-to-cord signal SIR in b500-DWI in the malignant node (1.80 ± 0.54) was higher than that in the benign group (0.75 ± 0.29) with P < 0.001. The statistically calculated cutoff value (> 1.2) estimated 100% sensitivity and specificity with AUC = 1.00. (D) The lesion-to-chest wall SIR in b500-DWI in the malignant node (6.43 ± 1.28) was higher than that in the benign node (2.63 ± 0.94) with P < 0.001. The statistically calculated cutoff value (> 4.1) estimated 96.67% sensitivity, 100% specificity, with AUC = 0.997. € The mean ADC values in the malignant nodes (0.83 ± 0.20 × 10–3 mm2/s) were significantly lower than that in the benign nodes (1.85 ± 0.19 × 10−3 mm2/s) with P < 0.001. The statistically calculated cutoff value (≤ 1.2) estimated 100% sensitivity and specificity with AUC = 1.00.ConclusionsBiopsy remains the main diagnostic modality for the characterization of mediastinal lymphadenopathy despite its hazards and limitations. This study proved that MRI could be accepted as an alternative non-invasive imaging tool that can overcome the PET-CT limitations. The lesion signal-to-cord and to-muscle ratios in both T2-WI and DWI-MRI side by side with the mean ADC value showed high statistical accuracy.

Indications for a brain biopsy in neurological diseases of unknown etiology: The role of magnetic resonance imaging findings and liquid biopsy in yielding definitive pathological diagnoses

Brain biopsies are often considered for patients who cannot be diagnosed with various laboratory test results. However, physicians tend to be hesitant regarding their application in possibly non-neoplastic brain diseases, due to the invasiveness and risks. The aim was to determine the indications for brain biopsies in cases of neurological diseases of unknown etiology. We retrospectively evaluated diagnostic accuracy, laboratory findings (including a liquid biopsy for malignant lymphoma), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics and the post-treatment outcomes of patients undergoing brain biopsies for neurological diseases of unknown etiology. The data of patients who had undergone a brain biopsy during their admission to Niigata University Hospital, between 2011 and 2024, were reviewed. Moreover, the laboratory data and MRI findings between patients with definitive and nonspecific biopsy diagnoses were compared. Twenty-six patients underwent a brain biopsy, and a definitive diagnosis was obtained in 14 patients (53.8%). Even in cases where a nonspecific diagnosis was made, biopsy findings helped rule out malignancy and guide clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions. The liquid biopsy for malignant lymphoma was performed in eight patients, with one yielding a positive result, consistent with primary central nervous system lymphoma. The sensitivity and specificity of liquid biopsy were 0.5 and 1, respectively. Diffusely contrasted cortical lesions and the presence of mass effects on MRI, were significantly associated with a definitive diagnosis, compared to a nonspecific diagnosis. In conclusion, brain MRI and liquid biopsies can assist in determining the appropriate indications for brain biopsies in neurological diseases of unknown etiology.

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Risk Calculators to Predict Prostate Cancer Risk

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based risk calculators can replace or augment traditional prostate cancer (PCa) risk prediction tools. However, few data are available comparing performance of different MRI-based risk calculators in external cohorts across different countries or screening paradigms. To externally validate and compare MRI-based PCa risk calculators (Prospective Loyola University Multiparametric MRI [PLUM], UCLA [University of California, Los Angeles]-Cornell, Van Leeuwen, and Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator-MRI [RPCRC-MRI]) in cohorts from Europe and North America. This multi-institutional, external validation diagnostic study of 3 unique cohorts was performed from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2022. Two cohorts from Europe and North America used MRI before biopsy, while a third cohort used an advanced serum biomarker, the Prostate Health Index (PHI), before MRI or biopsy. Participants included adult men without a PCa diagnosis receiving MRI before prostate biopsy. Prostate MRI followed by prostate biopsy. The primary outcome was diagnosis of clinically significant PCa (grade group ≥2). Receiver operating characteristics for area under the curve (AUC) estimates, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis were evaluated. A total of 2181 patients across the 3 cohorts were included, with a median age of 65 (IQR, 58-70) years and a median prostate-specific antigen level of 5.92 (IQR, 4.32-8.94) ng/mL. All models had good diagnostic discrimination in the European cohort, with AUCs of 0.90 for the PLUM (95% CI, 0.86-0.93), UCLA-Cornell (95% CI, 0.86-0.93), Van Leeuwen (95% CI, 0.87-0.93), and RPCRC-MRI (95% CI, 0.86-0.93) models. All models had good discrimination in the North American cohort, with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80-0.89) for PLUM and AUCs of 0.83 for the UCLA-Cornell (95% CI, 0.80-0.88), Van Leeuwen (95% CI, 0.79-0.88), and RPCRC-MRI (95% CI, 0.78-0.87) models, with somewhat better calibration for the RPCRC-MRI and PLUM models. In the PHI cohort, all models were prone to underestimate clinically significant PCa risk, with best calibration and discrimination for the UCLA-Cornell (AUC, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.81-0.85]) model, followed by the PLUM model (AUC, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.80-0.84]). The Van Leeuwen model was poorly calibrated in all 3 cohorts. On decision curve analysis, all models provided similar net benefit in the European cohort, with higher benefit for the PLUM and RPCRC-MRI models at a threshold greater than 22% in the North American cohort. The UCLA-Cornell model demonstrated highest net benefit in the PHI cohort. In this external validation study of patients receiving MRI and prostate biopsy, the results support the use of the PLUM or RPCRC-MRI models in MRI-based screening pathways regardless of European or North American setting. However, tools specific to screening pathways incorporating advanced biomarkers as reflex tests are needed due to underprediction.

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided renal biopsy shows high safety and diagnostic yield: a tertiary cancer center experience.

To evaluate the technical success and outcomes of renal biopsies performed under magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a closed-bore, 1.5-Tesla MRI unit. We retrospectively reviewed our institutional biopsy database and included 150 consecutive MRI-guided biopsies for renal masses between November 2007 and March 2020. We recorded age, sex, BMI, tumor characteristics, RENAL nephrometry score, MRI scan sequence, biopsy technique, complications, diagnostic yield, pathologic outcome, and follow-up imaging. Univariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between different parameters and the development of complications. McNemar's test was used to assess the association between paired diagnostic yield measurements for fine-needle aspiration and core samples. A total of 150 biopsies for 150 lesions were performed in 150 patients. The median tumor size was 2.7 cm. The median BMI was 28.3. The lesions were solid, partially necrotic/cystic, and predominantly cystic in 137, eight, and five patients, respectively. Image guidance using fat saturation steady-state free precession sequence was recorded in 95% of the biopsy procedures. Samples were obtained using both fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and cores in 99 patients (66%), cores only in 40 (26%), and FNA only in three (2%). Tissue sampling was diagnostic in 144 (96%) lesions. No major complication developed following any of the biopsy procedures. The median follow-up imaging duration was 8 years and none of the patients developed biopsy-related long-term complication or tumor seeding. MRI-guided renal biopsy is safe and effective, with high diagnostic yield and no major complications. Image-guided renal biopsy is safe and effective, and should be included in the management algorithm of patients with renal masses. Core biopsy is recommended. • MRI-guided biopsy is a safe and effective technique for sampling of renal lesions. • MRI-guided biopsy has high diagnostic yield with no major complications. • Percutaneous image-guided biopsy plays a key role in the management of patients with renal masses.

Repeated Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed to enhance the benefit-to-harm ratio of prostate cancer screening, but data on repeated screening outcomes are lacking. To describe outcomes of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening with MRI and prostate biopsies at repeat screening. This secondary analysis examined the population-based, screen-by-invitation STHLM3-MRI randomized clinical trial, which recruited Swedish men aged 50 to 74 years. Men were eligible for repeat screening at 2 to 3 years if they had PSA levels of 1.5 ng/mL or greater at trial inclusion, were randomized to the MRI-targeted group (including screening using biomarkers and MRI), and were not diagnosed with prostate cancer after the first screening round. Repeat screening was performed between November 10, 2021, and February 20, 2023. Data analysis was performed between May and August 2023. Participants underwent blood sampling, including PSA testing. A biparametric MRI scan was performed if PSA levels were 3 ng/mL or greater, and men with lesions with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 3 or greater were referred for targeted and systematic biopsies. The primary outcome was clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score of ≥3 + 4). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men with clinically insignificant cancer (Gleason score of 6), the number of elevated PSA tests, MRI scans, and biopsy procedures. Of 7609 men from the first screening round, 2078 (27.3%) were eligible for and were invited for rescreening. Among the invitees, 1500 (72.2%) participated. Their median age was 67 (IQR, 61-72) years. Of 1094 men with PSA levels between 1.5 and 2.9 ng/mL in the first screening round, 326 (29.8%) had levels of 3 ng/mL or greater in the second round. Overall, 667 men (44.5%) had PSA levels of 3 ng/mL or greater: 617 underwent MRI (92.5%), revealing 51 (7.6%) with equivocal lesions (PI-RADS score of 3) and 33 (4.9%) with suspicious lesions (PI-RADS score of ≥4). Only 10 of 383 men (2.6%) with a prior negative MRI result had a lesion with a PI-RADS score of 4 or greater. Among the 1500 rescreened men, 48 (3.2%) had a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or greater, including 19 (1.3%) with a score of 4 + 3 or greater and 11 (0.7%) with a score of 6. In this secondary analysis of the STHLM3-MRI randomized clinical trial, cancer detection during the second screening round in biennial PSA and MRI-based prostate cancer screening was limited, and the detection of low-grade tumors remained low. A substantial proportion of men exhibited elevated PSA levels during rescreening, and a considerable portion of MRI scans performed lacked lesions suggestive of cancer. Future studies should explore strategies to reduce MRI-related resource use. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03377881.

Do we need MRI in all biopsy naïve patients? A multicenter cohort analysis

PurposeThe combined approach (CB) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy (TB) and systematic biopsy (SB) is strongly recommended based on numerous studies in biopsy naïve men with suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCA). However, the unbalanced accessibility of MRI, challenges related to reimbursement and the scarcity of specialized medical practitioners continue to impede a widespread implementation.Therefore, our objective was to determine a subset of men that could undergo SB without an increased risk of underdiagnosis at reduced expenses.MethodsA multicenter analysis of 2714 men with confirmed PCA and suspicious MRI who underwent CB were enrolled. Cancer detection rates were compared between the different biopsy routes SB, TB and CB using McNemar paired test. Additionally, Gleason grade up- and down-grading was determined.ResultsCB detected more csPCA than TB and SB (p < 0.001), irrespective of MRI findings or biopsy route (transperineal vs. transrectal). Thereby, single biopsy approaches misgraded > 50% of csPCA. TB showed higher diagnostic efficiency, defined as csPCA detection per biopsy core than CB and SB (p < 0.001). For patients with abnormal DRE and PSA levels > 12.5 ng/ml, PSAD > 0.35 ng/ml/cm3, or > 75 years, SB and CB showed similar csPCA detection rates.ConclusionConducting CB provides the highest level of diagnostic certainty and minimizes the risk of underdiagnosis in almost all biopsy-naive men. However, in patients with suspicious DRE and high PSA levels, PSAD, or advanced age solely using SB leads to similar csPCA detection rates. Thus, a reduced biopsy protocol may be considered for these men in case resources are limited.

Omission of Breast Surgery in Predicted Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Non-inferiority Trial.

Advances in chemotherapeutic and targeted agents have increased pathologic complete response (pCR) rates after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). Vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) has been suggested to accurately evaluate pCR. This study aims to confirm the non-inferiority of the 5-year disease-free survival of patients who omitted breast surgery when predicted to have a pCR based on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and VAB after NST, compared with patients with a pCR who had undergone breast surgery in previous studies. The Omission of breast surgery for PredicTed pCR patients wIth MRI and vacuum-assisted bIopsy in breaST cancer after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (OPTIMIST) trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, non-inferiority study enrolling in 17 tertiary care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Eligible patients must have a clip marker placed in the tumor and meet the MRI criteria suggesting complete clinical response (post-NST MRI size ≤ 1 cm and lesion-to-background signal enhancement ratio ≤ 1.6) after NST. Patients will undergo VAB, and breast surgery will be omitted for those with no residual tumor. Axillary surgery can also be omitted if the patient was clinically node-negative before and after NST and met the stringent criteria of MRI size ≤ 0.5 cm. Survival and efficacy outcomes are evaluated over five years. This study seeks to establish evidence for the safe omission of breast surgery in exceptional responders to NST while minimizing patient burden. The trial will address concerns about potential undertreatment due to false-negative results and recurrence as well as improved patient-reported quality of life issues from the omission of surgery. Successful completion of this trial may reshape clinical practice for certain breast cancer subtypes and lead to a safe and less invasive approach for selected patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05505357. Registered on August 17, 2022. Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007638. Registered on July 25, 2022.

Lobular Neoplasia Diagnosed by MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy: Identifying Upgrade Rate to Malignancy and Outcomes of Clinical and Surgical Management.

The aim of this study was to determine surgical and clinical outcomes of lobular neoplasia (LN) diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biopsy, including upgrade to malignancy, and to assess for characteristics associated with upgrade. A single-institution retrospective study, between 2013 and 2022, of patients with histopathological findings of LN via MRI-guided biopsy was performed using an institutional database and review of the electronic medical records. Decision for excision or surveillance was made by a multidisciplinary team per institutional practice. Patient demographics and imaging characteristics were summarized using descriptive analyses. Upgrade was defined as upgrade to cancer on surgical pathology for patients treated with excision or the development of cancer at the biopsy site during surveillance. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare features of the upgraded cohort with the remainder of the group. Ninety-four MRI biopsies diagnosing LN were included. Median age was 57 years (range 37-78years). Forty-six lesions underwent excision while 48 lesions were surveilled. The upgrade rate was 7.4% (7/94). Upgrades in the excised cohort consisted of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS; n=1), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; n=3) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC; n=2), while one interval development of DCIS was observed at the site of biopsy in the surveillance cohort. No MRI or patient variables were associated with upgrade. In this contemporary cohort of MRI-detected LNs, the upgrade rate was low. Omission of surgery for MRI-detected LNs in carefully selected patients may be considered in a shared decision-making capacity between the patient and the treatment team. Larger cohorts are needed to determine factors predictive of upgrade risk.

Cost-Effectiveness of Annual Prostate MRI and Potential MRI-Guided Biopsy After Prostate-Specific Antigen Test Results

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and potential MRI-guided biopsy enable enhanced identification of clinically significant prostate cancer. Despite proven efficacy, MRI and potential MRI-guided biopsy remain costly, and there is limited evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of this approach in general and for different prostate-specific antigen (PSA) strata. To examine the cost-effectiveness of integrating annual MRI and potential MRI-guided biopsy as part of clinical decision-making for men after being screened for prostate cancer compared with standard biopsy. Using a decision analytic Markov cohort model, an economic evaluation was conducted projecting outcomes over 10 years for a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old men in the US with 4 different PSA strata (<2.5 ng/mL, 2.5-4.0 ng/mL, 4.1-10.0 ng/mL, >10 ng/mL) identified by screening through Monte Carlo microsimulation with 10 000 trials. Model inputs for probabilities, costs in 2020 US dollars, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were from the literature and expert consultation. The model was specifically designed to reflect the US health care system, adopting a federal payer perspective (ie, Medicare). Magnetic resonance imaging with potential MRI-guided biopsy and standard biopsy. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY was estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. For the 3 PSA strata of 2.5 ng/mL or greater, the MRI and potential MRI-guided biopsy strategy was cost-effective compared with standard biopsy (PSA 2.5-4.0 ng/mL: base-case ICER, $21 131/QALY; PSA 4.1-10.0 ng/mL: base-case ICER, $12 336/QALY; PSA >10.0 ng/mL: base-case ICER, $6000/QALY). Results varied depending on the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and potential MRI-guided biopsy. Results of probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the MRI and potential MRI-guided biopsy strategy was cost-effective at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY in a range between 76% and 81% of simulations for each of the 3 PSA strata of 2.5 ng/mL or more. This economic evaluation of a hypothetical cohort suggests that an annual MRI and potential MRI-guided biopsy was a cost-effective option from a US federal payer perspective compared with standard biopsy for newly eligible male Medicare beneficiaries with a serum PSA level of 2.5 ng/mL or more.

Men’s Acceptance of Screening for Prostate Cancer with Prostate-specific Antigen, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Prostate Biopsy

BackgroundA prerequisite before introducing a screening program is that the screening examinations are acceptable to participants. ObjectiveTo evaluate the acceptance and bother of prostate cancer screening examinations. Design, setting, and participantsThe randomized population-based GÖTEBORG-2 prostate cancer screening trial invited >37 000 men for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in case of elevated PSA and prostate biopsy (targeted and/or systematic) if indicated. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisParticipants were asked to fill out a questionnaire and rate the level of bother associated with each examination (PSA, MRI, and prostate biopsy) on a categorical scale ranging from 1 to 5 (1 = “not at all bothersome” and 5 = “very bothersome”), and to rate their willingness to repeat the examinations, by marking an X on a continuous scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = “yes, without any hesitation” and 10 = “no, absolutely not”). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used. Results and limitationsCompliance with MRI was 96% (1790/1872), compliance with biopsy was 89% (810/907), and the response rate to the questionnaire was 75% (608/810). Men who underwent all examinations (n = 577) responded that biopsy was more bothersome than PSA test (p < 0.001) and MRI (p < 0.001). High levels of bother (≥4 out of 5) were reported by 2% (12/577) for PSA test, 8% (46/577) for MRI, and 43% (247/577) for biopsy. Men were more willing to repeat MRI than biopsy (p < 0.001), but the difference was small (median 0.2 [interquartile range 0.1–0.6] vs 0.5 [0.1–2.0]). ConclusionsBiopsies are more bothersome than MRI, but a large majority of men accept to repeat both examinations if necessary. Omitting biopsy for MRI-negative men and shifting to targeted biopsies only will reduce bother for men participating in prostate cancer screening. Patient summaryWe asked men how bothersome they found the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and prostate biopsies. Biopsies were more bothersome than PSA and MRI, but most men were willing to repeat all procedures if necessary.

Zone-specific computer-aided diagnosis system aimed at characterizing ISUP ≥ 2 prostate cancers on multiparametric magnetic resonance images: evaluation in a cohort of patients on active surveillance.

To assess a region-of-interest-based computer-assisted diagnosis system (CAD) in characterizing aggressive prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from patients under active surveillance (AS). A prospective biopsy database was retrospectively searched for patients under AS who underwent MRI and subsequent biopsy at our institution. MRI lesions targeted at baseline biopsy were retrospectively delineated to calculate the CAD score that was compared to the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 score assigned at baseline biopsy. 186 patients were selected. At baseline biopsy, 51 and 15 patients had International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 cancer respectively. The CAD score had significantly higher specificity for ISUP ≥ 2 cancers (60% [95% confidence interval (CI): 51-68]) than the PI-RADS score (≥ 3 dichotomization: 24% [CI: 17-33], p = 0.0003; ≥ 4 dichotomization: 32% [CI: 24-40], p = 0.0003). It had significantly lower sensitivity than the PI-RADS ≥ 3 dichotomization (85% [CI: 74-92] versus 98% [CI: 91-100], p = 0.015) but not than the PI-RADS ≥ 4 dichotomization (94% [CI:85-98], p = 0.104). Combining CAD findings and PSA density could have avoided 47/184 (26%) baseline biopsies, while missing 3/51 (6%) ISUP 2 and no ISUP ≥ 3 cancers. Patients with baseline negative CAD findings and PSAd < 0.15ng/mL2 who stayed on AS after baseline biopsy had a 9% (4/44) risk of being diagnosed with ISUP ≥ 2 cancer during a median follow-up of 41months, as opposed to 24% (18/74) for the others. The CAD could help define AS patients with low risk of aggressive cancer at baseline assessment and during subsequent follow-up.

Newly Diagnosed Anaplastic Astrocytoma: &gt; 23 Year Survival in a 31-Year and 11-Month-Old Female Treated with Antineoplastons

Rationale: Anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), a malignant brain tumor that arises from astrocytic cells, has a poor prognosis. It accounts for 6–7% of gliomas and 1-2% of brain tumors. Objectives: A 31-year and 11-month-old female with an AA is presented to discuss the efficacy of Antineoplastons A10 (Atengenal) and AS2-1 (Astugenal) in the treatment of AA. She presented to the Burzynski Clinic (BC) for treatment and was enrolled in Protocol BT-08, “Phase II Study of Antineoplastons A10 and AS2-1 in Adult Patients with Anaplastic Astrocytoma”, receiving both intravenous (IV) and oral Antineoplastons A10 and AS2-1 (ANP therapy). IV ANP therapy was delivered continuously via subclavian catheter and infusion pump. Tumor response was determined by comparison of baseline brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to sequential brain MRIs during therapy. Findings: The patient presented to the BC with no prior treatment and a one-month history of right arm clumsiness and right leg weakness. Brain MRI and stereotactic biopsy performed elsewhere had demonstrated an AA. Baseline MRI at the BC showed a 2.0 cm2 nonenhancing lesion and two enhancing lesions (0.02 cm2 and 0.15 cm2 ) in the left parietal lobe. IV ANP therapy was given over 56 days, and a complete response (CR) was demonstrated after one month of therapy. Oral ANP therapy was subsequently provided for 17 months. At last follow-up, in June 2023, the patient was healthy and showed no evidence of recurrent disease. She had an overall survival (OS) of &gt; 23 years and one month since diagnosis and an OS of &gt; 23 years since the start of IV ANP therapy. Conclusions: The utilization of ANP therapy in an adult female patient with AA is presented. The patient achieved a CR and prolonged OS, suggesting that ANP therapy may be an effective therapeutic option for adults with AA.

The oncologic risk of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic cores in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy (MRI-biopsy) detects high-Grade Group (GG) prostate cancers not identified by systematic biopsy (S-biopsy). However, questions have been raised whether cancers detected by MRI-biopsy and S-biopsy, grade-for-grade, are of equivalent oncologic risk. The authors evaluated the relative oncologic risk of GG diagnosed by S-biopsy and MRI-biopsy. This was a retrospective analysis of all patients who had both MRI-biopsy and S-biopsy and underwent with prostatectomy (2014-2022) at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Three logistic regression models were used with adverse pathology as the primary outcome (primary pattern 4, any pattern 5, seminal vesicle invasion, or lymph node involvement). The first model included the presurgery prostate-specific antigen level, the number of positive and negative S-biopsy cores, S-biopsy GG, and MRI-biopsy GG. The second model excluded MRI-biopsy GG to obtain the average risk based on S-biopsy GG. The third model excluded S-biopsy GG to obtain the risk based on MRI-biopsy GG. A secondary analysis using Cox regression evaluated the 12-month risk of biochemical recurrence. In total, 991 patients were identified, including 359 (36%) who had adverse pathology. MRI-biopsy GG influenced oncologic risk compared with S-biopsy GG alone (p<.001). However, if grade was discordant between biopsies, then the risk was intermediate between grades. For example, the average risk of advanced pathology for patients who had GG2 and GG3 on S-biopsy was 19% and 66%, respectively, but the average risk was 47% for patients who had GG2 on S-biopsy and patients who had GG3 on MRI-biopsy. The equivalent estimates for 12-month biochemical recurrence were 5.8%, 15%, and 10%, respectively. The current findings cast doubt on the practice of defining risk group based on the highest GG. Because treatment algorithms depend fundamentally on GG, further research is urgently required to assess the oncologic risk of prostate tumors depending on detection technique. Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to help diagnose prostate cancer can help identify more high-grade cancers than using a systematic template biopsy alone. However, we do not know if high-grade cancers diagnosed with the help of an MRI are as dangerous to the patient as high-grade cancers diagnosed with a systematic biopsy. We examined all of our patients who had an MRI biopsy and a systematic biopsy and then had their prostates removed to find out if these patients had risk factors and signs of aggressive cancer (cancer that spread outside the prostate or was very high grade). We found that, if there was a difference in grade between the systematic biopsy and the MRI-targeted biopsy, the risk of aggressive cancer was between the two grades.

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Targeted Biopsy for Active Surveillance

This review explores the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-targeted biopsies in the selection and monitoring of men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) who are on active surveillance (AS). At present, MRI and MRI-targeted biopsies are broadly recommended for the selection and monitoring of men with low-risk PCa on AS. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and MRI-targeted biopsies should be considered for screening, or in the early period following screening, for men who have been enrolled after only a random transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in order to reduce initial misclassification. However, a significant number of pathological progressions were diagnosed solely by systematic biopsies. This suggests that systematic biopsy, in conjunction with MRI-targeted biopsy and protocol-based transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, should not be omitted when there are no visible lesions on mpMRI. The use of MRI features during AS, particularly the PRECISE (Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation) score, appears promising as it offers a more accurate risk restratification during follow-up. Evidence for these changes is awaited from larger, prospective cohorts.

Diagnostic value of preoperative examination for evaluating margin status in breast cancer.

A positive resection margin is a major risk factor for local breast cancer recurrence after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Preoperative imaging examinations are frequently employed to assess the surgical margin. To investigate the role and value of preoperative imaging examinations [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), molybdenum target, and ultrasound] in evaluating margins for BCS. A retrospective study was conducted on 323 breast cancer patients who met the criteria for BCS and consented to the procedure from January 2014 to July 2021. The study gathered preoperative imaging data (MRI, ultrasound, and molybdenum target examination) and intraoperative and postoperative pathological information. Based on their BCS outcomes, patients were categorized into positive and negative margin groups. Subsequently, the patients were randomly split into a training set (226 patients, approximately 70%) and a validation set (97 patients, approximately 30%). The imaging and pathological information was analyzed and summarized using R software. Non-conditional logistic regression and LASSO regression were conducted in the validation set to identify factors that might influence the failure of BCS. A column chart was generated and applied to the validation set to examine the relationship between pathological margin range and prognosis. This study aims to identify the risk factors associated with failure in BCS. The multivariate non-conditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated that various factors raise the risk of positive margins following BCS. These factors comprise non-mass enhancement (NME) on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, multiple focal vascular signs around the lesion on MRI, tumor size exceeding 2 cm, type III time-signal intensity curve, indistinct margins on molybdenum target examination, unclear margins on ultrasound examination, and estrogen receptor (ER) positivity in immunohistochemistry. LASSO regression was additionally employed in this study to identify four predictive factors for the model: ER, molybdenum target tumor type (MT Xmd Shape), maximum intensity projection imaging feature, and lesion type on MRI. The model constructed with these predictive factors exhibited strong consistency with the real-world scenario in both the training set and validation set. Particularly, the outcomes of the column chart model accurately predicted the likelihood of positive margins in BCS. The proposed column chart model effectively predicts the success of BCS for breast cancer. The model utilizes preoperative ultrasound, molybdenum target, MRI, and core needle biopsy pathology evaluation results, all of which align with the real-world scenario. Hence, our model can offer dependable guidance for clinical decision-making concerning BCS.

Correlation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI with breast cancer

To evaluate the prognostic value of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women referred to radiological department as a high risk for breast cancer. A retrospective, cross-sectional study included 327 consecutive patients (mean age: 60 years, age range: 30-90 years) who underwent breast MRI and tissue biopsy between 2007 and 2016. All MRI images (T1, T2, and subtraction images) were evaluated visually. The relationship of BPE with patient age, fibroglandular tissue (FGT), Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) categories, presence of breast cancer, and expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), progesterone receptor (PR), oestrogen receptor (ER), and Ki67 were analysed. Furthermore, all variables were correlated with pre- and postmenopausal status. BPE of bilateral breast showed a weak correlation with FGT (right BPE: r=-0.14, p=0.004; left BPE: r=0.16, p=0.003), a weak negative correlation with patient age (right BPE: r=-0.14, p=0.007; left BPE: r=-0.15, p=0.006), and significant correlation with HER2 (right BPE, p=0.02), left BPE with HER2 was not significant. Among the correlations between BPE and BIRADS, only between right BPE and right BIRADS was significant (p=0.031). No clear evidence of an association between breast MRI BPE and breast cancer in premenopausal and postmenopausal status was observed, and no difference was found between the right and left breasts. The results of the present study showed no significant correlations between BPE and breast cancer. In addition, there was no significant difference between the right and left breast. Hence, BPE of MRI may not be a reliable biomarker of breast cancer development.

Combining b2500 diffusion-weighted imaging with BI-RADS improves the specificity of breast MRI

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of visual assessment of diffusion-weighted images (DWI) obtained with a b value of 2500 s/mm2 in addition to a conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol to characterize breast lesions. Materials and methodsThis single-institution retrospective study included participants who underwent clinically indicated breast MRI and breast biopsy from May 2017 to February 2020. The examination included a conventional MRI protocol including DWI obtained with a b value of 50 s/mm2 (b50DWI) and a b value of 800 s/mm2 (b800DWI) and DWI obtained with a b value of 2500 s/mm2 (b2500DWI). Lesions were classified using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS) categories. Three independent radiologists assessed qualitatively the signal intensity within the breast lesions relative to breast parenchyma on b2500DW and b800DWI and measured the b50-b800-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value. The diagnostic performances of BI-RADS, b2500DWI, b800DWI, ADC and of a model combining b2500DWI and BI-RADS were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis. ResultsA total of 260 patients with 212 malignant and 100 benign breast lesions were included. There were 259 women and one man with a median age of 53 years (Q1, Q3: 48, 66 years). b2500DWI was assessable in 97% of the lesions. Interobserver agreement for b2500DWI was substantial (Fleiss kappa = 0.77). b2500DWI yielded larger area under the ROC curve (AUC, 0.81) than ADC with a 1 × 10−3 mm2/s threshold (AUC, 0.58; P = 0.005) and than b800DWI (AUC, 0.57; P = 0.02). The AUC of the model combining b2500DWI and BI-RADS was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79–0.88). Adding b2500DWI to BI-RADS resulted in a significant increase in specificity from 25% (95% CI: 17–35) to 73% (95% CI: 63–81) (P < 0.001) with a decrease in sensitivity from 100% (95% CI: 97–100) to 94% (95% CI: 90–97), (P < 0.001). ConclusionVisual assessment of b2500DWI has substantial interobserver agreement. Visual assessment of b2500DWI offers better diagnostic performance than ADC and b800DWI. Adding visual assessment of b2500DWI to BI-RADS improves the specificity of breast MRI and could avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Histopathological correlations and fat replacement imaging patterns in recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 12.

Despite the widespread use of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurements with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to track disease progression in muscle disorders, it is still unclear how these findings relate to histopathological changes in muscle biopsies of patients with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy autosomal recessive type 12 (LGMDR12). Furthermore, although it is known that LGMDR12 leads to a selective muscle involvement distinct from other muscular dystrophies, the spatial distribution of fat replacement within these muscles is unknown. We included 27 adult patients with LGMDR12 and 27 age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls and acquired 6-point Dixon images of the thighs and T1 and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) MR images of the whole body. In 16 patients and 15 controls, we performed three muscle biopsies, one in the semimembranosus, vastus lateralis, and rectus femoris muscles, which are severely, intermediately, and mildly affected in LGMDR12, respectively. We correlated the PDFF to the fat percentage measured on biopsies of the corresponding muscles, as well as to the Rochester histopathology grading scale. In patients, we demonstrated a strong correlation of PDFF on MRI and muscle biopsy fat percentage for the semimembranosus (r=0.85, P<0.001) and vastus lateralis (r=0.68, P=0.005). We found similar results for the correlation between PDFF and the Rochester histopathology grading scale. Out of the five patients with inflammatory changes on muscle biopsy, three showed STIR hyperintensities in the corresponding muscle on MRI. By modelling the PDFF on MRI for 18 thigh muscles from origin to insertion, we observed a significantly inhomogeneous proximo-distal distribution of fat replacement in all thigh muscles of patients with LGMDR12 (P<0.001), and different patterns of fat replacement within each of the muscles. We showed a strong correlation of fat fraction on MRI and fat percentage on muscle biopsy for diseased muscles and validated the use of Dixon fat fraction imaging as an outcome measure in LGMDR12. The inhomogeneous fat replacement within thigh muscles on imaging underlines the risk of analysing only samples of muscles instead of the entire muscles, which has important implications for clinical trials.

Use of IsoPSA with prostate MRI PIRADS score in biopsy decision making in patients with elevated PSA.

388 Background: IsoPSA is prospectively validated to be superior to PSA and percent free PSA in predicting prostate cancer (PCa) as well as clinically significant prostate cancer. We sought to evaluate the use of IsoPSA in combination with prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the prostate imaging reporting and data systems (PIRADS) on predicting either benign/indolent or csPCA at biopsy. Methods: This was a single center retrospective review of prospectively collected patient data that included all patients who underwent IsoPSA testing, preoperative prostate MRI and prostate biopsy from 2019-2021. Chi Squared analysis was used to assess for associations between a binary classification of low (&lt;6) or elevated (&gt;6) IsoPSA index, in combination with PIRADS scores in predicting either indolent/benign or csPCa at biopsy. Logistic regression was used to explore independent predictors of csPCa. Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis was completed with areas under the curve (AUC) for IsoPSA and PIRADS scores, both alone and in combination. Predictive probabilities were assessed using combinations of IsoPSA thresholds and PIRADS scores. Results: 207 patients met inclusion criteria. Among patients with a negative MRI, low IsoPSA index was associated with a lower chance of csPCa compared to those with elevated IsoPSA (2% vs 15%, p&lt;0.018). For those with a PIRADS 4-5 lesion, elevated IsoPSA index was associated with a higher chance of csPCa at biopsy compared to a low IsoPSA index (49% vs 19%, p=0.05). On multivariate analysis, elevated IsoPSA and PIRADS 4-5 were independent predictors of csPCa (p&lt;0.001). Similarly, low IsoPSA index and negative MRI were independent predictors of benign/indolent disease at biopsy (p&lt;0.001). Using predictive probabilities, the combination of PIRADS 4-5 with elevated IsoPSA was associated with the highest risk of csPCa (48%) and the highest AUC (0.83) for predicting csPCa. This AUC value was superior to either marker alone (0.76, 0.76) and total PSA alone (0.57) (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: The combination of elevated IsoPSA with adverse PIRADS score (4-5) is associated with a 48% predicted probability of csPCa at biopsy with an AUC of 0.83, which was more accurate than either marker alone. A low IsoPSA in combination with a negative MRI resulted in a 98% chance of benign/indolent disease at biopsy. These findings may prove useful for the practicing Urologist and may help guide discussions regarding the need for biopsy when interpreting various IsoPSA/PIRADS combinations. [Table: see text]