Macrosomic Infants Research Articles

Impact of inter-pregnancy BMI change on perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study

ObjectiveTo examine the patterns and predictors of inter-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) change and its impact on perinatal outcomes in the second pregnancy. DesignRetrospective cohort study. SettingTertiary teaching hospital in Adelaide, Australia. PopulationWomen with their first and second consecutive, singleton deliveries occurring between 2000 and 2012 (N=5371). MethodsInter-pregnancy weight change calculated based on difference between BMI at respective antenatal booking visits. Association between inter-pregnancy weight change and perinatal outcomes investigated using multivariate generalised linear models, with stratification according to initial maternal BMI category in first pregnancy. Main outcome measuresGestational diabetes (GDM); pregnancy induced hypertensive disorders; small-for-gestational age (SGA); preterm birth; large-for-gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia (>4500g). ResultsOn average, women with a normal BMI gained 1kg/m2 between first and second pregnancies, while women who were overweight or obese gained 1.37kg/m2. Among women with a normal BMI in their first pregnancy, a BMI increase of ≥4kg/m2 was associated with increased risk of developing GDM (aRR 1.97; 95% CI 1.22–3.19), a macrosomic (aRR 4.06; 95% CI 2.25–7.34) or LGA infant (aRR 1.31 0.96–1.78) in the second pregnancy, while a reduction in BMI (≤–2kg/m2) was associated with an increased risk of SGA (aRR 1.94; 1.19–3.16). Among women who were overweight or obese in their first pregnancy, a BMI increase of ≥2–4 and ≥4kg/m2 was associated with increased risks of developing GDM in the second pregnancy (aRR 1.39; 95% CI 1.01–1.91 and aRR 1.64 95% CI 1.16–2.31; ptrend<0.001), while no associations were observed for a BMI increase and risk of a macrosomic, SGA, or LGA infant. In contrast, reduction in BMI (≤–2kg/m2) was associated with a reduced risk of GDM (aRR 0.58 95% CI 0.37–0.90) and SGA (aRR 0.47; 95% CI 0.25–0.87). ConclusionIncreases in BMI between pregnancies is associated with an increased risk for perinatal complications, even in normal-weight women, while a reduction in BMI is associated with improved perinatal outcomes among women who are overweight/obese. Inter-pregnancy weight control is an important target to reduce the risk of an adverse perinatal outcome in a subsequent pregnancy.

Deployment and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Primary Findings and Methodological Considerations.

Objective To characterize the pregnancy outcomes of women Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans including prevalence of preterm delivery, low birth weight, and macrosomia, and to highlight methodological limitations that can impact findings. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted starting in 2014 analyzing data from the 2009 to 2011 National Health Study for a New Generation of US Veterans, which sampled Veterans deployed and not deployed to OIF/OEF. All pregnancies resulting in a live birth were included, and categorized as occurring among non-deployers, before deployment, during deployment, or after deployment. Outcomes included preterm birth, low birth weight, and macrosomia. The association of deployment with selected outcomes was estimated using separate general estimating equations to account for lack of outcome independence among women contributing multiple pregnancies. Adjustment variables included maternal age at outcome, and race/ethnicity. Results There were 2276 live births (191 preterm births, 153 low birth weight infants, and 272 macrosomic infants). Compared with pregnancies before deployment, pregnancies among non-deployers and those after deployment appeared to have greater risk of preterm birth [non-deployers: odds ratio (OR)=2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25, 3.72; after deployment: OR=1.90, 95% CI 0.90, 4.02]. A similar pattern was observed for low birth weight. No association of deployment with macrosomia was detected. Discussion Compared with non-deployers, those who eventually deploy appear to have better pregnancy outcomes prior to deployment, but this advantage is no longer apparent after deployment. Non-deployers may not be an appropriate reference group to study the putative health impacts of deployment on pregnancy outcomes.

The effect of a sonographic estimated fetal weight on the risk of cesarean delivery in macrosomic and small for gestational-age infants

Objective: To assess the association of a sonographic estimated fetal weight (sonoEFW) with the risk of cesarean delivery in women with macrosomic or small for gestational age (SGA) infants.Methods: Retrospective cohort of singleton deliveries >24 weeks by one MFM practice from 2005 to 2014. We included all patients who delivered an infant with macrosomia (birth weight ≥4000 g) or SGA (birth weight <10th percentile). We compared the risk of cesarean delivery between patients who did and did not have a sonoEFW within four weeks of delivery. Regression analysis was performed to control for any differences in baseline characteristics.Results: In patients with macrosomic infants (n = 352), the risk of cesarean delivery was significantly higher in the sonoEFW group (45.3% versus 17.6%, aOR 2.144, 95% CI: 1.06–4.34). When we restricted the analysis to the subgroup of 265 patients who attempted vaginal delivery, our results were similar (22.3% versus 9.1%, aOR 2.73, 95% CI: 1.15–6.48). In patients with an SGA infant (n = 614), the risk of cesarean delivery was not higher in the sonoEFW group (37.4% versus 24.1%, aOR 1.23, 95% CI: 0.80–2.07), nor in those who attempted vaginal delivery (19.8% versus 13.7%, aOR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.62–2.21).Conclusions: A sonoEFW prior to delivery is independently associated with cesarean delivery in women with macrosomic infants, but not those with SGA infants. This should be considered when deciding to obtain a sonoEFW at the end of pregnancy, particularly if not for an accepted indication.

Prevalence of low birth weight, macrosomia and stillbirth and their relationship to associated maternal risk factors in Hohoe Municipality, Ghana

Introductionbirth weight is vital to the development potential of the newborn. Abnormal birth weight (such as low birth weight and macrosomia) is an important determinant of child survival, disabilities, stunting, and long-term adverse consequences for the onset of non-communicable diseases in the life course and therefore demands appropriate public health interventions. Stillbirths are also considered one of the most important, but most poorly understood and documented adverse outcomes of pregnancy. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of abnormal birth weight and related maternal risk factors, as well as pregnancy outcomes, such as stillbirth. Methodsa retrospective study design was used to analyze 4262 delivery records for singleton pregnancies from January 2013 to December 2014 seen at the Hohoe municipal hospital, Volta region in Ghana. The data on birth weight and related factors were derived from the delivery book. Data was analyzed using STATA. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the association between maternal factors such as parity, age and intermittent preventive treatment of malaria, sex of infant and abnormal birth weight. Association between stillbirth and related factors was assessed using logistic regression. Resultsprevalence of low birth weight (<2.5kg) was 9.69% and macrosomia (≥4.0kg) was 3.03%. There was an increased risk of a first born being of low birth weight than second or third born (RR; 2.04, CI; 1.59–2.64, p<0.0001). There were also an increased risks of mothers <20 years giving birth to low-birthweight infants (RR; 1.46, CI; 1.11–1.93, p=0.007) compared to mothers who were within the age ranges of 20–30 years and also among those who took only one (RR; 1.57, CI; 1.02–2.39, p=0.039) or no intermittent preventive treatment for malaria during pregnancy (RR; 1.57, CI; 1.24–1.98, p=<0.0001) compared to those who took three doses. Risk of macrosomic birth was particularly high among 5th born (RR; 2.66, CI; 1.43–4.95, p=0.002) compared to first or second born. Stillbirth rate was 27/1000 births. Thirty-two percent of the stillbirths (n=38) had low birth weight whereas 6.8% (n=8) were macrosomic. There was a greater than fivefold (AOR; 5.6, CI; 3.6–8.7) and greater than twofold (AOR; 2.4, CI; 1.1–5.3, p=0.025) increase in odds for stillbirth among low birth weight and macrosomic infants respectively. Conclusionmacrosomia and low birth weight co-existed among infants in Hohoe municipality, both of which are associated with adverse pregnancy outcome such as stillbirth. Given the apparent association between maternal age <20 years and increased risk, health promotion strategies aimed at preventing pregnancies among teenagers could be implemented to aid the reduction of stillbirth rates.

Resultados perinatales entre macrosomas hijos de madre diabética y macrosomas hijos de madre no diabética

ObjectiveTo assess the incidence and perinatal complications of macrosomic infants born to diabetic and non-diabetic mothers. Patients and methodsA six-year retrospective study of newborns at our hospital. A total of 996 macrosomic newborns were found. Maternal characteristics, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes were studied. ResultsOf 18005 newborns, 996 were macrosomic infants (5.53%). Of these, 103 (10.3%) were born to diabetic mothers. Diabetic mothers had higher parity (1.89 vs. 1.35; P<0.000), cesarean section rate (52.4 vs. 31.1%; P<0.05), and resuscitation rate (5.8 vs. 1.8%; P<0.006; RR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.42-5.9), and greater need for hospitalization (19.4 vs. 9.6%; p<0.002; RR: 2; 95% CI: 1.3-3.2) and intensive care (5.8 vs. 0.7%; P<0.000; RR: 5.3; 95% CI: 2.8-10) mostly for hypoglycemia (7.8 vs. 1%; P<0.000; RR: 5; 95% CI: 2.8-8.3), jaundice (8.7 vs. 2.1%; P<0.000; RR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.9-5.9), respiratory distress (4.9 vs. 1.3%; P<0.009; RR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.4-6.7), and asphyxia (2.9 vs. 0.4%; P<0.005; RR: 4.3; 95% CI: 1.8-11.1). No differences were found in birth trauma. ConclusionsMacrosomic infants born to diabetic mothers have an increased risk of hospital admission in the neonatal period for hypoglycemia, jaundice, respiratory distress, and asphyxia, and a greater need of intensive care. Obstetric trauma rates were similar in both groups.

Pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and macrosomia in a Canadian birth cohort

Objective: To compare demographic characteristics and maternal, fetal, neonatal, and pregnancy outcomes of term macrosomic infants of obese and non-obese mothers.Methods: A sample of 1996 singleton, term deliveries was drawn from the All Our Babies Cohort, a prospective, community-based pregnancy cohort. Maternal self-reported socio-demographic and anthropometric information was linked to the clinical data on pregnancy and birth events abstracted from electronic health records. Demographic, obstetrical characteristics and maternal, fetal, neonatal, and pregnancy outcomes of macrosomic infants in obese, overweight, and normal weight women were compared. Multinomial regression analysis assessed the risk factors of macrosomia in primiparous and multiparous women stratified by maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, controlling for confounding variables.Results: Macrosomia affected 10% of pregnancies in the study. Mothers whose infants were macrosomic were more likely to be Caucasian, obese, have had previous deliveries, undergo induction of labour and delivery by emergency C-section, particularly for labour abnormalities. Macrosomic infants were more likely to be delivered postdates, have meconium stained liquor and require resuscitation at birth. There were no significant differences in birth and neonatal outcomes of macrosomic pregnancies between obese, overweight and normal weight women. Pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational age at delivery were risk factors for macrosomia in all women. Ethnicity and history of delivery of a macrosomic infant were additional independent risk factors in multiparas.Conclusions: Obesity in pregnancy increases the risk of delivery of a macrosomic infant in both primiparous and multiparous women. The maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes of macrosomic pregnancies are similar in obese and normal weight women.

Macrosomie fœtale à Lubumbashi: facteurs de risque et pronostic maternel et périnatal

IntroductionLa macrosomie fœtale est habituellement définie par un poids de naissance supérieur ou égal à 4000 grammes. L'objectif de cette étude est de déterminer la fréquence de la macrosomie, d'identifier les facteurs étiologiques et d’évaluer le pronostic maternel et périnatal.MéthodesIl s'agit d'une étude cas-témoins menéeau sein des maternités de 10 hôpitaux généraux de référence de la ville de Lubumbashi en République Démocratique du Congoentre le 1er décembre 2013 et le 31 mars 2014. Les accouchées ont été réparties en deux groupes, en fonction du poids de naissance de leurs nouveau-nés: groupe I (≥4000 grammes ou plus) et groupe II (2500 à 3500 grammes). Les caractéristiques maternelles, l'environnement obstétrical ainsi que le pronostic maternel et périnatal ont été étudiés et comparés dans les deux groupes. Les données ont été analysées à l'aide du logiciel Épi info version 7.1. Les différences étaient jugées significatives pour un seuil de p<0,05.RésultatsAu total, 668 mères et leurs nouveau-nés ont été inclus dont 167 macrosomes et 501témoins. L'incidence de la macrosomie fœtale était de 5,7%. Comparativement aux mères de témoins, nous avons trouvé que les mères des nouveau-nés macrosomes étaient plus âgées, multipares, multigestes, obèses, diabétiques et avaient antérieurement donné naissance à un macrosome. Les taux de césarienne et de délivrance pathologique étaient significativement élevés chez les mères de macrosomes que chez celles de témoins. Lesexe masculin était significativement plus prédominant chez macrosomes que chez les témoins. La dystocie des épaules étaitenregistrée uniquement dans le groupe des macrosomes.ConclusionLa prévalence de l'accouchement d'un macrosome à Lubumbashi est de 5,7%. La macrosomie est souvent à l'origine de complications maternelles et périnatales. La réduction de ces dernières passe par une meilleure connaissance des facteurs de risque et un dépistage précoce.

Macrosomia, shoulder dystocia and elongation of the brachial plexus: what is the role of caesarean section?

L'accouchement d'un fœtus macrosome est un accouchement à haut risque de complications maternofoetales. La dystocie des épaules reste la complication fœtale la plus redoutée, amenant au recours, parfois démesuré, à la césarienne. L'objectif de ce travail est d'évaluer l'intérêt de cette césarienne préventive. Il s'agit d'une étude rétrospective à propos de 400 accouchements de fœtus macrosomes survenus entre Février 2010 et Décembre 2012. Nous avons aussi identifié les cas de nouveau-nés ayant eu une dystocie des épaules pendant l'année 2012 ainsi que leur poids de naissance respectifs. Les fœtus macrosomes ont pesé entre 4000g et 4500g dans 86,25% des cas et entre 4500 et 5000 dans 12,25% des cas. L'accouchement était par voie basse dans 68% des cas. Parmi les 400 accouchements de macrosomes, 9 cas de dystocie des épaules ont été enregistrés (2,25%). Tous ces cas sont survenus lors d'accouchements par voie basse. Le risque de dystocie des épaules lors d'un accouchement par voie basse a augmenté de façon significative avec l'augmentation du poids à la naissance (p<10-4). Le risque d'élongation du plexus brachial était de 11 pour mille accouchements de macrosomes par voie basse. Ce risque n'était pas corrélé au poids de naissance (p=0,38). Le risque de séquelles post-traumatiques était de 0,71%. La dystocie des épaules a concerné un fœtus macrosome dans 58 % des cas. La dystocie des épaules n'est pas une complication exclusivement associée à la macrosomie. Le dépistage des accouchements à risque et le renforcement de la formation des obstétriciens sur les manœuvres à réaliser en cas de dystocie des épaules semblent être les meilleurs moyens pour éviter ses complications.

Nutritional Correlates of Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes and Insulin Resistance in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2000-2010

Objective: To evaluate the associations of gestational diabetes (GDM) history with dietary intake, nutritional status, insulin resistance, demographic, and anthropometrical data. Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for the years 2000-2010. Data analysis was based on 290 women who reported a history of GDM compared to 4239 women who denied a GDM history. Insulin resistance [HOMA_IR = (fasting insulin in mU/mL × fasting glucose in mmol/L)/405] was calculated. Pearson correlation, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Student’s t-tests, and chi-square analysis were used while linear regression assessed independent associations. Results: The median time-lapse from the diagnosis of GDM was 15 years. Women with a GDM history had significantly higher body mass index (BMI), other anthropometric measurements, diastolic blood pressures and insulin resistance. They were also more likely to be Hispanic, have delivered macrosomic infants, and delivered via cesarean. Previous GDM history compared to non-GDM subjects had significantly higher dietary intakes of energy calories, protein, total fat, saturated fatty acids, mono-saturated fatty acids, and cholesterol. Within the entire cohort, increasing insulin resistance was also associated with lower income, less college education, Hispanic or African American ethnicity, obesity, higher systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and with higher dietary cholesterol but lower intake of dietary fiber and micronutrients. Regression analyses showed that GDM history, Hispanic ethnicity, BMI, dietary intake of cholesterol and decreasing income were independently predictive of insulin resistance. Conclusion: The data confirm that even many years after a pregnancy associated with GDM, women with a history of GDM still report significantly higher dietary intakes of energy calories, protein, and fat with no corresponding increase in consumption of dietary fiber or minerals and vitamins. Consequently, the increased calorie and food consumption of women with previous GDM are associated with obesity, insulin resistance and higher blood pressures. These observations may suggest the need to target high-risk groups who may need more resources and awareness of the benefits of quality nutrition.

Incentives for increasing prenatal care use by women in order to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Incentives for increasing prenatal care use by women in order to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Exercise during pregnancy protects against hypertension and macrosomia: randomized clinical trial

The prevalence of all pregnancies with some form of hypertension can be up to 10%, with the rates of diagnosis varying according to the country and population studied and the criteria used to establish the diagnosis. Prepregnancy obesity and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) of all body mass index (BMI) categories have been associated with maternal hypertensive disorders and linked to macrosomia (>4000 g) and low birthweight (<2500 g). No large randomized controlled trial with high adherence to an exercise program has examined pregnancy-induced hypertension and these associated issues. We investigated whether women adherent (≥80% attendance) to an exercise program initiated early showed a reduction in pregnancy-induced hypertension and excessive GWG in all prepregnancy BMI categories, and determined if maternal exercise protected against macrosomia and low birthweight. We sought to examine the impact of a program of supervised exercise throughout pregnancy on the incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension. A randomized controlled trial was used. Women were randomized into an exercise group (N= 382) or a control group (N= 383) receiving standard care. The exercise group trained 3 d/wk (50-55 min/session) from gestational weeks 9-11 until weeks 38-39. The 85 training sessions involved aerobic exercise, muscular strength, and flexibility. High attendance to the exercise program regardless of BMI showed that pregnant women who did not exercise are 3 times more likely to develop hypertension (odds ratio [OR], 2.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-6.81, P= .01) and are 1.5 times more likely to gain excessive weight if they do not exercise (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.06-2.03, P= .02). Pregnant women who do not exercise are also 2.5 times more likely to give birth to a macrosomic infant (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.03-6.20, P= .04). Maternal exercise may be a preventative tool for hypertension and excessive GWG, and may control offspring size at birth while reducing comorbidities related to chronic disease risk.

English

English

Gestational weight gain and body mass indexes have an impact on the outcomes of diabetic mothers and infants.

This study evaluated mothers with diabetes to determine whether prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), BMI on delivery or gestational weight gain (GWG) had the greatest impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes. We retrospectively examined the medical charts of 634 full-term infants born to mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus not requiring insulin (n = 476), gestational diabetes mellitus requiring insulin (n = 140) and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (n = 18). Data regarding maternal BMI before pregnancy and on delivery were recorded, as well as maternal and neonatal complications. Infants born to women who gained more than the recommended weight during pregnancy had higher birthweights, higher rates of meconium-stained amniotic fluid and neonatal hypoglycaemia. Using logistic regression, Caesarean section delivery was predicted by gestational diabetes requiring insulin, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.76, maternal hypertension (OR 2.4), infants born large for gestational age (OR 2.78) and maternal BMI ≥ 30 on delivery (OR 1.06). Neonatal complications were predicted by maternal insulin-dependent diabetes (OR 5.21), lower gestational age (OR 0.8) and GWG above the recommended amount (OR 1.56). Women with diabetes should be made aware that higher GWG can lead to Caesarean section delivery, infant macrosomia and other neonatal complications.

Maternal risk factors and perinatal outcomes among pacific islander groups in Hawaii: a retrospective cohort study using statewide hospital data.

BackgroundStudies suggest Pacific Islander women have disparate rates of preterm birth, primary cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and low birthweight infants. However, data is limited. In order to improve the health of Pacific Islanders, it is essential to better understand differences in obstetric outcomes in this diverse populationMethodsThis study compared perinatal outcomes between Pacific Islander (9,646) and White (n = 5,510) women who delivered a singleton liveborn in any Hawaii hospital from January 2010 to December 2011 using the Hawaii Health Information Corporation (HHIC) database. Pacific Islanders were disaggregated into the following groups: Native Hawaiian, Samoan, Micronesian, and Other Pacific Islanders. Perinatal outcomes (e.g. hypertensive diseases, birthweight, mode of delivery) were compared using multivariable logistic models controlling for relevant sociodemographic and health risk factors (e.g. age and payer type).ResultsSignificant differences in perinatal outcomes between Pacific Islander and White women and newborns were noted. All Pacific Islander groups had an increased risk of hypertension. Outcome differences were also seen between Pacific Islanders groups. Native Hawaiians had the highest risk of low birthweight infants, Samoans had the highest risk of macrosomic infants and Micronesians had the highest risk of cesarean delivery.ConclusionsImportant differences in perinatal outcomes among Pacific Islanders exist. It is important to examine Pacific Islander populations separately in future research, public health interventions, and policy.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0671-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A retrospective study of maternal and neonatal outcomes in overweight and obese women with gestational diabetes mellitus

In pregnant women, obesity is a risk factor for multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preeclampsia, and preterm birth. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with GDM. A retrospective study of 5010 patients with GDM in 11 provinces in China was performed in 2011. Participants were divided into three groups based on BMI as follows: a normal weight group (BMI 18.5–23.9 kg/m2), an overweight group (BMI 24–27.9 kg/m2), and an obese group (BMI ≥28.0 kg/m2). Maternal baseline characteristics and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationships between BMI and the risk of adverse outcomes. Of the 5010 GDM patients, 2879 subjects were from north China and 2131 were from south China. Women in the normal weight group gained more weight during pregnancy compared with the overweight and obese GDM patients. Women in the overweight and obese groups had increased odds of hypertension during pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.50, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.31–1.76 and AOR = 2.12, 95 % CI = 1.84–3.16). The AORs for macrosomia in the overweight and obese groups were 1.46 (95 % CI = 1.16–1.69) and 1.94 (95 % CI = 1.31–2.98), respectively. The relative risk of delivering a baby with an Apgar score <7 at 5 min was significantly higher in women who were obese (AOR = 2.11, 95 % CI = 1.26–2.85) before pregnancy compared with normal weight women. Compared with the normal weight subjects, the incidence of cesarean section and emergency cesarean section among overweight and obese women with GDM was significantly higher (P < 0.001). Overall, overweight and obese women with GDM have an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including hypertension during pregnancy, macrosomic infants, infants with low Apgar scores, and the need for an emergency cesarean section. More attention should be paid to GDM women who are obese because they are at risk for multiple adverse outcomes.

Pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain in Thai pregnant women as risks for low birth weight and macrosomia.

Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) have been reported to be associated with pregnancy outcomes. Due to the nutrition transition in Thailand, the double burden of malnutrition is increasing and this may have negative consequences on birth outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG with the risks of low birth weight and macrosomia. We performed a secondary analysis of data obtained from an iodine supplementation trial in mildly iodine-deficient Thai pregnant women. Pre-pregnancy BMI was classified using the WHO classification. GWG was categorized using the IOM recommendation. Binary and multinomial logistic regressions were performed. Among 378 pregnant women, the prevalence of pre-pregnancy underweight (BMI<18.5 kg/m2) and overweight (BMI>=25 kg/m2) were 17.2% and 14.3%, respectively. Normal weight women had the highest median GWG [15.0 (12.0, 19.0) kg] when compared to overweight women [13.2 (9.0, 16.3) kg]. Forty-one percent of women had excessive GWG, while 23% of women gained weight inadequately. Women with a high pre-pregnancy BMI had a 7-fold higher risk of having a macrosomic infant. Women who had excessive GWG were 8 times more likely to deliver a newborn with macrosomia. Both high pre-pregnancy maternal weight and excessive weight gain during pregnancy increase risk of infant macrosomia. Therefore, maintaining normal body weight before and throughout pregnancy should be recommended in order to reduce the risk of excessive infant birth weight and its associated complications.

Troponin T and NT ProBNP Levels in Gestational, Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetic Mothers and Macrosomic Infants.

This study compares NT proBNP and troponin T levels in umbilical cord arterial blood and postnatal echocardiographic findings for infants of gestational and pregestational diabetic mothers and macrosomic infants. Twenty-seven infants of pregestational diabetic mothers, 61 infants of gestational diabetic mothers and 37 macrosomic infants of nondiabetic mothers were prospectively enrolled in this study along with a control group of 58 healthy infants of mothers without any pregestational or gestational disorders as the control group. All enrollees were born after 34 weeks of gestation. For this study, umbilical cord blood was drawn during delivery to determine NT proBNP and troponin T levels. Echocardiography was performed 24-72 h after the delivery. Umbilical cord troponin T and NT proBNP levels were found to be higher in the diabetic and macrosomic groups than in the control group (all of them p < 0.001). NT proBNP levels were positively correlated with interventricular septum thickness in the pregestational and gestational infants of diabetic mothers groups (r = 0.564 and r = 0.560, respectively, p < 0.01). Both pregestational and gestational diabetic mothers were divided into two groups according to HbA1c levels in the third trimester as good (<6.1 %) and suboptimal (>6.1 %) metabolic control. In the good and suboptimal metabolic control diabetic groups, NT proBNP levels were also positively correlated with interventricular septum thickness (r = 0.536 and r = 0.576, respectively, p < 0.01). In the suboptimal metabolic control diabetic group, NT proBNP was only found to be positively correlated with the left ventricular mass index (r = 0.586, p < 0.01). While there was no correlation in the myocardial performance index between infants of diabetic mothers and the control group, the myocardial performance index of macrosomic infants was lower than that of the control group (p = 0.017). Cardiac biomarkers (NT proBNP and troponin T) were elevated in infants of diabetic mothers and macrosomic infants. While there was a positive correlation between NT proBNP levels and cardiac structure in infants of pregestational and gestational diabetic mothers, there was no relationship between NT proBNP levels and cardiac function.

Low cord blood serum levels of vitamin D: cause or effect of fetal macrosomia?

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare cord blood vitamin D levels of macrosomic large for gestational age (LGA) and appropriate gestational age (AGA) newborns.Seventy-nine healthy, normal term newborns were included in the study. They were divided by birth weight into two groups: 37 in the LGA group above 4,000 g, and 42 newborns in the AGA group birth weight between 3,000 g and 4,000 g. Cord blood samples from groups were collected. Circulating 25(OH)D was measured as 25 hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in serum using a kit.Maternal characterstics (age, body mass index [BMI], and gestational age) did not differ between the AGA and LGA groups. Cord blood 25 OH vitamin D levels were significantly low in neonates with LGA (p = 0,02).The authors found that macrosomic infants had low levels of vitamin D. Providing vitamin D supplements to pregnant women may prevent macrosomia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to prove this assertion.

Neonatal outcomes of macrosomic infants of diabetic and non-diabetic mothers

To compare neonatal outcomes (including breastfeeding (BF) initiation) of 170 macrosomic IDM with that of 739 macrosomic nIDM. Retrospective cohort investigation of all macrosomic infants born consecutively over a four-year period (2008-2011). Macrosomic (birth weight ≥4000 g) IDM included 100 infants whose mothers had gestational diabetes and 70 whose mothers had pregestational diabetes. IDM were more likely to be delivered by cesarean to obese women while nIDM were more likely to be delivered vaginally to younger women with a higher level of education. Ethnic distribution (60% white, 20% black, 10% Hispanic and 10% Asian or African) was similar in each group. Forty-nine percent of IDM and 7% of nIDM required NICU admission. Respiratory disorders (mainly TTNB) affected 21% of IDM and 3% of nIDM while hypoglycemia was observed in 36% of IDM and 15% of nIDM. Of the 35 IDM delivered vaginally, 10 were complicated by shoulder dystocia without injury. Conversely, 70 of the 458 nIDM delivered vaginally experienced shoulder dystocia that resulted in 6 limb fractures and 3 brachial plexus injuries. On arrival to labor and delivery, 75% of all women intended to BF; however, at the time of discharge, 65% of women with diabetes and 92% of those without diabetes who intended to BF had initiated BF. Both macrosomic IDM and macrosomic nIDM are at risk for significant morbidities. Macrosomic IDM carry a higher risk for NICU admissions, leading to maternal-infant separation, and lower BF initiation rates.

Parental Body Mass Index, Gestational Weight Gain, and Risk of Macrosomia: a Population-Based Case-Control Study in China.

The prevalence of macrosomia has risen markedly worldwide, including in China, during the past two decades. Few epidemiological studies, however, have investigated the risk factors for macrosomia in China. This study was designed to investigate the associations between parental anthropometric characteristics, gestational weight gain (GWG), and risk of macrosomia in China. This population-based, case-control study in Wuhan, China, included a total of 6341 subjects (870 cases and 5471 controls). Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Mothers or fathers who were overweight or obese before pregnancy had an elevated risk of giving birth to a macrosomic infant compared with their normal weight counterparts. Women with GWG above the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendation had an adjusted OR of 6.09 [95% CI 5.04, 7.35] for delivering a macrosomic infant compared with women who had GWG within the IOM recommendation. When stratified by maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), women who were underweight or normal weight before pregnancy were observed to have a higher risk of macrosomia birth associated with greater GWG. Parental pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity and excessive GWG during pregnancy were highly associated with macrosomia. The association with GWG was most pronounced in mothers who had a normal or underweight pre-pregnancy BMI. Weight control efforts before pregnancy for mothers and fathers as well as control of maternal gain during pregnancy may reduce the risk of macrosomia.