mAChR Subtypes Research Articles

Development of Novel M4 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Antagonists for the Treatment of Movement Disorders

Non‐selective antagonists of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) that broadly inhibit all five mAChR subtypes provide an efficacious treatment for some movement disorders, including Parkinson’s disease and dystonia. Despite their efficacy in these and other central nervous system disorders, anti‐muscarinic therapy has limited utility due to severe adverse effects that often limit their tolerability by patients. Recent advances in understanding the roles that each mAChR subtype plays in disease pathology suggest that highly selective ligands for individual subtypes may underlie the anti‐parkinsonian and anti‐dystonic efficacy observed with the use of non‐selective anti‐muscarinic therapeutics. Our recent work has indicated that the M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor has several important roles in opposing aberrant neurotransmitter release, intracellular signaling pathways, and brain circuits associated with movement disorders. This raises the possibility that selective antagonists of M4 may recapitulate the efficacy of non‐selective anti‐muscarinic therapeutics and may decrease or eliminate the adverse effects associated with these non‐selective drugs. However, this hypothesis has not been directly tested due to lack of selective antagonists of M4. Here we utilize genetic mAChR knockout animals in combination with non‐selective mAChR antagonists to confirm that the M4 receptor underlies the locomotor‐stimulating and anti‐parkinsonian efficacy in rodent models. We also report the synthesis, discovery, and characterization of a series of first‐in‐class selective M4 antagonists. These novel compounds have ideal pharmacokinetic properties for in vivo evaluations, and we have confirmed that these optimized compounds have anti‐parkinsonian and anti‐dystonic efficacy in pharmacological and genetic models of movement disorders. These data provide critical pre‐clinical rationale for the development of M4 antagonists and represent a potential novel treatment mechanism to meet the unmet clinical need across several movement disorders.

P598. Exploring the Molecular Determinants for Functional Selectivity of the Antipsychotic Xanomeline at Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors

Xanomeline (formulated as KarXT) is a selective M1/M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonist being developed for the treatment of symptoms associated with schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Questions remain regarding the mechanisms of xanomeline’s selectivity. Therefore, we specifically investigated molecular determinants of xanomeline binding and functional selectivity using two of the most highly homologous Gi-coupled mAChR subtypes (M2/M4).

Development of VU6019650: A Potent, Highly Selective, and Systemically Active Orthosteric Antagonist of the M5 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.

The muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) subtype 5 (M5) represents a novel potential target for the treatment of multiple addictive disorders, including opioid use disorder. Through chemical optimization of several functional high-throughput screening hits, VU6019650 (27b) was identified as a novel M5 orthosteric antagonist with high potency (human M5 IC50 = 36 nM), M5 subtype selectivity (>100-fold selectivity against human M1-4) and favorable physicochemical properties for systemic dosing in preclinical addiction models. In acute brain slice electrophysiology studies, 27b blocked the nonselective muscarinic agonist oxotremorine-M-induced increases in neuronal firing rates of midbrain dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area, a part of the mesolimbic dopaminergic reward circuitry. Moreover, 27b also inhibited oxycodone self-administration in male Sprague-Dawley rats within a dose range that did not impair general motor output.

Blockade of M4 muscarinic receptors on striatal cholinergic interneurons normalizes striatal dopamine release in a mouse model of TOR1A dystonia

Trihexyphenidyl (THP), a non-selective muscarinic receptor (mAChR) antagonist, is commonly used for the treatment of dystonia associated with TOR1A, otherwise known as DYT1 dystonia. A better understanding of the mechanism of action of THP is a critical step in the development of better therapeutics with fewer side effects. We previously found that THP normalizes the deficit in striatal dopamine (DA) release in a mouse model of TOR1A dystonia (Tor1a+/ΔE knockin (KI) mice), revealing a plausible mechanism of action for this compound, considering that abnormal DA neurotransmission is consistently associated with many forms of dystonia. However, the mAChR subtype(s) that mediate the rescue of striatal dopamine release remain unclear. In this study we used a combination of pharmacological challenges and cell-type specific mAChR conditional knockout mice of either sex to determine which mAChR subtypes mediate the DA release-enhancing effects of THP. We determined that THP acts in part at M4 mAChR on striatal cholinergic interneurons to enhance DA release in both Tor1a+/+ and Tor1a+/ΔE KI mice. Further, we found that the subtype selective M4 antagonist VU6021625 recapitulates the effects of THP. These data implicate a principal role for M4 mAChR located on striatal cholinergic interneurons in the mechanism of action of THP and suggest that subtype selective M4 mAChR antagonists may be effective therapeutics with fewer side effects than THP for the treatment of TOR1A dystonia.

Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of 4,4'-Difluorobenzhydrol Carbamates as Selective M1 Antagonists.

Due to their important role in mediating a broad range of physiological functions, muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) have been a promising target for therapeutic and diagnostic applications alike; however, the list of truly subtype-selective ligands is scarce. Within this work, we have identified a series of twelve 4,4’-difluorobenzhydrol carbamates through a rigorous docking campaign leveraging commercially available amine databases. After synthesis, these compounds have been evaluated for their physico–chemical property profiles, including characteristics such as HPLC-logD, tPSA, logBB, and logPS. For all the synthesized carbamates, these characteristics indicate the potential for BBB permeation. In competitive radioligand binding experiments using Chinese hamster ovary cell membranes expressing the individual human mAChR subtype hM1-hM5, the most promising compound 2 displayed a high binding affinitiy towards hM1R (1.2 nM) while exhibiting modest-to-excellent selectivity versus the hM2-5R (4–189-fold). All 12 compounds were shown to act in an antagonistic fashion towards hM1R using a dose-dependent calcium mobilization assay. The structural eligibility for radiolabeling and their pharmacological and physico–chemical property profiles render compounds 2, 5, and 7 promising candidates for future position emission tomography (PET) tracer development.

Subtype-selective contribution of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors for filial imprinting in newly-hatched domestic chicks

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) play an important role in many brain functions. Our previous study revealed that the injection of mAChRs antagonist scopolamine into the intermediate medial mesopallium (IMM) region, which is critical for filial imprinting, impairs memory formation. In avian brains, four mAChR subtypes have been identified (M2, M3, M4 and M5). M3 and M5 receptors increase the excitability of neurons, whereas M2 and M4 receptors reduce the excitability. Because the scopolamine blocks all subtypes, the previous study did not identify which subtype contributes to the memory formation. By injecting several types of mAChR antagonists into the IMM, in this study we determined which mAChR subtype plays a critical role in imprinting. First, the effects of antagonists on the excitatory receptor subtypes M3 and M5 were examined. Injection of the M3 antagonist (DAU5884) at 20 mM or the M5 antagonist (ML381) at 2 mM impaired imprinting. Considering the pKi value of DAU5884, the impairment seems to be caused by DAU5884 binding to M3 and/or M4 receptors. Second, the effect of antagonists on the inhibitory receptor subtype M2 was examined. The results showed that the M2 antagonist (AQ-RA741) impaired imprinting at a concentration of 20 mM. Considering the pKi value of AQ-RA741, the impairment seems to be caused by AQ-RA741 binding to M2 and/or M4. The findings of this study suggests that the excitatory receptor subtypes M3 and M5 and the inhibitory receptor subtype M2 and/or M4 cooperate to achieve the appropriate balance of acetylcholine signaling to execute imprinting.

Balanced modulation of neuromuscular synaptic transmission via M1 and M2 muscarinic receptors during inhibition of cholinesterases

Organophosphorus (OP) compounds that inhibit acetylcholinesterase are a common cause of poisoning worldwide, resulting in several hundred thousand deaths each year. The pathways activated during OP compound poisoning via overstimulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) play a decisive role in toxidrome. The antidotal therapy includes atropine, which is a nonspecific blocker of all mAChR subtypes. Atropine is efficient for mitigating depression in respiratory control centers but does not benefit patients with OP-induced skeletal muscle weakness. By using an ex vivo model of OP-induced muscle weakness, we studied the effects of the M1/M4 mAChR antagonist pirenzepine and the M2/M4 mAChR antagonist methoctramine on the force of mouse diaphragm muscle contraction. It was shown that weakness caused by the application of paraoxon can be significantly prevented by methoctramine (1 µM). However, neither pirenzepine (0.1 µM) nor atropine (1 µM) was able to prevent muscle weakness. Moreover, the application of pirenzepine significantly reduced the positive effect of methoctramine. Thus, balanced modulation of neuromuscular synaptic transmission via M1 and M2 mAChRs contributes to paraoxon-induced muscle weakness. It was shown that methoctramine (10 µmol/kg, i.p.) and atropine (50 µmol/kg, i.p.) were equieffective toward increasing the survival of mice poisoned with a 2xLD50 dose of paraoxon.

Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Localization on Distinct Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons Within the ACC and LPFC of the Rhesus Monkey.

Acetylcholine (ACh) can act on pre- and post-synaptic muscarinic receptors (mAChR) in the cortex to influence a myriad of cognitive processes. Two functionally-distinct regions of the prefrontal cortex—the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)—are differentially innervated by ascending cholinergic pathways yet, the nature and organization of prefrontal-cholinergic circuitry in primates are not well understood. Using multi-channel immunohistochemical labeling and high-resolution microscopy, we found regional and laminar differences in the subcellular localization and the densities of excitatory and inhibitory subpopulations expressing m1 and m2 muscarinic receptors, the two predominant cortical mAChR subtypes, in the supragranular layers of LPFC and ACC in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). The subset of m1+/m2+ expressing SMI-32+ pyramidal neurons labeled in layer 3 (L3) was denser in LPFC than in ACC, while m1+/m2+ SMI-32+ neurons co-expressing the calcium-binding protein, calbindin (CB) was greater in ACC. Further, we found between-area differences in laminar m1+ dendritic expression, and m2+ presynaptic localization on cortico-cortical (VGLUT1+) and sub-cortical inputs (VGLUT2+), suggesting differential cholinergic modulation of top-down vs. bottom-up inputs in the two areas. While almost all inhibitory interneurons—identified by their expression of parvalbumin (PV+), CB+, and calretinin (CR+)—expressed m1+, the localization of m2+ differed by subtype and area. The ACC exhibited a greater proportion of m2+ inhibitory neurons compared to the LPFC and had a greater density of presynaptic m2+ localized on inhibitory (VGAT+) inputs targeting proximal somatodendritic compartments and axon initial segments of L3 pyramidal neurons. These data suggest a greater capacity for m2+-mediated cholinergic suppression of inhibition in the ACC compared to the LPFC. The anatomical localization of muscarinic receptors on ACC and LPFC micro-circuits shown here contributes to our understanding of diverse cholinergic neuromodulation of functionally-distinct prefrontal areas involved in goal-directed behavior, and how these interactions maybe disrupted in neuropsychiatric and neurological conditions.

Structural Features of Iperoxo–BQCA Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Hybrid Ligands Determining Subtype Selectivity and Efficacy

Selective agonists for the human M1 and M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are attractive candidates for the treatment of cognitive disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. Past efforts to optimize a ligand for selective agonism at any one of the M1-M5 mAChR subtypes has proven to be a significant challenge. Recently, research efforts have demonstrated that hybrid ligands may offer a potential solution to the lack of selectivity at mAChRs. In an attempt to design M1 mAChR selective agonists by hybridizing an M1 mAChR selective positive allosteric modulator [1-(4-methoxybenzyl)-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid] and a potent agonist [(4-[(4,5-dihydro-3-isoxazolyl)oxy]-N,N,N-trimethyl-2-butyn-1-aminium iodide) (iperoxo)], we unexpectedly discovered that these ligands possessed noticeable M2/M4 mAChR selectivity. Evaluation of truncated derivatives of the hybrid ligands at the M1-M5 mAChR subtypes suggests that the allosteric pharmacophore of iperoxo-based mAChR hybrid ligands likely sterically disrupts the allosteric site of the mAChRs, attenuating the efficacy of M1/M3/M5 mAChR responses compared to M2/M4 mAChRs, resulting in a preference for the M2/M4 mAChRs. However, at certain intermediate linker lengths, the effects of this apparent disruption of the allosteric site are diminished, restoring nonselective agonism and suggesting a possible allosteric interaction which is favorable to efficacy at all M1-M5 mAChRs.

Gene expression profiles of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in brain regions relating to filial imprinting of newly-hatched domestic chicks

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) in the central nervous system play an important role in regulating complex functions such as learning, memory, and selective attention. Five subtypes of the mAChRs (M1-M5) have been identified in mammals, and are classified into two subfamilies: excitatory (M1, M3, and M5) and inhibitory (M2 and M4) subfamilies. Filial imprinting of domestic chicks is a useful model in the laboratory to investigate the mechanisms of memory formation in early learning. We recently found that mAChRs in the intermediate medial mesopallium (IMM) are involved in the memory formation of imprinting. However, expression profiles of each mAChR subtype in the brain regions including the IMM remain unexplored. Here we show the unique gene expression of each mAChR subtype in the pallial regions involved in imprinting. In terms of the excitatory mAChRs, M5 was expressed in the IMM region and other parts of the pallium, whereas M3 was less expressed in the IMM but highly expressed in the hyperpallium and nidopallium. Regarding the inhibitory mAChRs, M2 was sparsely distributed but clearly in some cells throughout the pallial regions. M4 was highly expressed in the IMM region and other parts of the pallium. These expression profiles can be used as a basis for understanding cholinergic modulation in the memory formation of imprinting and other learning processes in birds, and compared to those of mammals.

Developmental age and biological sex influence muscarinic receptor function and neuron morphology within layer VI of the medial prefrontal cortex.

Acetylcholine (ACh) neurotransmission within the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) plays an important modulatory role to support mPFC-dependent cognitive functions. This role is mediated by ACh activation of its nicotinic (nAChR) and muscarinic (mAChR) classes of receptors, which are both present on mPFC layer VI pyramidal neurons. While the expression and function of nAChRs have been characterized thoroughly for rodent mPFC layer VI neurons during postnatal development, mAChRs have not been characterized in detail. We employed whole-cell electrophysiology with biocytin filling to demonstrate that mAChR function is greater during the juvenile period of development than in adulthood for both sexes. Pharmacological experiments suggest that each of the M1, M2, and M3 mAChR subtypes contributes to ACh responses in these neurons in a sex-dependent manner. Analysis of dendrite morphology identified effects of age more often in males, as the amount of dendrite matter was greatest during the juvenile period. Interestingly, a number of positive correlations were identified between the magnitude of ACh/mAChR responses and dendrite morphology in juvenile mice that were not present in adulthood. To our knowledge, this work describes the first detailed characterization of mAChR function and its correlation with neuron morphology within layer VI of the mPFC.

A novel in vitro assay model developed to measure both extracellular and intracellular acetylcholine levels for screening cholinergic agents.

Cholinergic neurons utilize choline (Ch) to synthetize acetylcholine (ACh) and contain a high-affinity Ch transporter, Ch acetyltransferase (ChAT), ACh receptors, and acetylcholinesterase (AChE). As the depletion or malfunction of each component of the cholinergic system has been reported in patients with dementia, many studies have sought to evaluate whether treatment candidates affect each of the cholinergic components. The associated changes in the cholinergic components may be reflected by intra- or extra-cellular ACh levels, with an increase in extracellular ACh levels occurring following AChE inhibition. We hypothesized that increases in intracellular ACh levels can be more sensitively detected than those in extracellular ACh levels, thereby capturing subtle effects in the cholinergic components other than AChE. The objective of this study was to test this hypothesis. We developed an in vitro model to measure both extracellular and intracellular ACh levels using the human cholinergic neuroblastoma cell line, LA-N-2, which have been reported to express Ch transporter, ChAT, muscarinic ACh receptor (mAChR), and AChE. With this model, we evaluated several drug compounds and food constituents reported to improve cholinergic function through various mechanisms. In addition, we conducted western blotting to identify the subtype of mAChR that is expressed on the cell line. Our cell-based assay system was capable of detecting increases in extracellular ACh levels induced by an AChE inhibitor at relatively high doses, as well as increases in intracellular ACh levels following the administration of lower AChE-inhibitor doses and an mAChR agonist. Moreover, increases in intracellular ACh levels were observed even after treatment with food constituents that have different mechanisms of action, such as Ch provision and ChAT activation. In addition, we revealed that LA-N-2 cells expressed mAChR M2. The findings support our hypothesis and indicate that the developed assay model can broadly screen compounds from drugs to food ingredients, with varying strengths and mechanisms of action, to develop treatments for ACh-relevant phenomena, including dementia and aging-related cognitive decline.

Discovery of the First Selective M4 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Antagonists with in Vivo Antiparkinsonian and Antidystonic Efficacy.

Nonselective antagonists of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) that broadly inhibit all five mAChR subtypes provide an efficacious treatment for some movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease and dystonia. Despite their efficacy in these and other central nervous system disorders, antimuscarinic therapy has limited utility due to severe adverse effects that often limit their tolerability by patients. Recent advances in understanding the roles that each mAChR subtype plays in disease pathology suggest that highly selective ligands for individual subtypes may underlie the antiparkinsonian and antidystonic efficacy observed with the use of nonselective antimuscarinic therapeutics. Our recent work has indicated that the M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor has several important roles in opposing aberrant neurotransmitter release, intracellular signaling pathways, and brain circuits associated with movement disorders. This raises the possibility that selective antagonists of M4 may recapitulate the efficacy of nonselective antimuscarinic therapeutics and may decrease or eliminate the adverse effects associated with these drugs. However, this has not been directly tested due to lack of selective antagonists of M4. Here, we utilize genetic mAChR knockout animals in combination with nonselective mAChR antagonists to confirm that the M4 receptor activation is required for the locomotor-stimulating and antiparkinsonian efficacy in rodent models. We also report the synthesis, discovery, and characterization of the first-in-class selective M4 antagonists VU6013720, VU6021302, and VU6021625 and confirm that these optimized compounds have antiparkinsonian and antidystonic efficacy in pharmacological and genetic models of movement disorders.

Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the Retina-Therapeutic Implications.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) belong to the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The family of mAChRs is composed of five subtypes, M1, M2, M3, M4 and M5, which have distinct expression patterns and functions. In the eye and its adnexa, mAChRs are widely expressed and exert multiple functions, such as modulation of tear secretion, regulation of pupil size, modulation of intraocular pressure, participation in cell-to-cell signaling and modula-tion of vascular diameter in the retina. Due to this variety of functions, it is reasonable to assume that abnormalities in mAChR signaling may contribute to the development of various ocular diseases. On the other hand, mAChRs may offer an attractive therapeutic target to treat ocular diseases. Thus far, non-subtype-selective mAChR ligands have been used in ophthalmology to treat dry eye disease, myopia and glaucoma. However, these drugs were shown to cause various side-effects. Thus, the use of subtype-selective ligands would be useful to circumvent this problem. In this review, we give an overview on the localization and on the functional role of mAChR subtypes in the eye and its adnexa with a special focus on the retina. Moreover, we describe the pathophysiological role of mAChRs in retinal diseases and discuss potential therapeutic approaches.

Expression of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in turkey cardiac chambers

The aim of the present study was to characterize the specific binding sites for [N-methyl-3H]-scopolamine ([3H]-NMS), a radioligand for labeling muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs), in membranes of four heart chambers obtained from adult male British United Turkey (BUT) Big 6 (“meat-type”) and Cröllwitzer (“wild-type”) turkeys. MAChR subtypes were examined by inhibiting [3H]-NMS binding with subtype selective non-labelled receptor antagonists. In all left and right atria as well as left and right ventricles of both turkey breeds, the specific [3H]-NMS binding was saturable, reversible and of high affinity (KD range: 0.5–1.0 nM). The maximum receptor density (Bmax) was not significantly different between the four cardiac chambers of BUT Big 6 turkeys, but a significant difference was found between atria and ventricles of Cröllwitzer turkeys. Moreover, significant lower Bmax was found in the atria of Cröllwitzer turkeys than in the atria of BUT Big 6, while the ventricular Bmax was significantly higher. In all cardiac chambers, unlabeled mAChR antagonists competed for specific [3H]-NMS binding sites in a concentration-dependent manner, suggesting the presence of the M3 and M2 receptor subtypes, whereby the latter was the predominant subtype. The presence of the M1 subtype could not be excluded. In conclusion, there was a difference between BUT Big 6 (“meat-type”) and Cröllwitzer (“wild-type”) turkeys with regard to receptor density in heart chambers with dominant M2 and M3 receptor subtypes.

Functions of Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes in Gastrointestinal Smooth Muscle: A Review of Studies with Receptor-Knockout Mice.

Parasympathetic signalling via muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) regulates gastrointestinal smooth muscle function. In most instances, the mAChR population in smooth muscle consists mainly of M2 and M3 subtypes in a roughly 80% to 20% mixture. Stimulation of these mAChRs triggers a complex array of biochemical and electrical events in the cell via associated G proteins, leading to smooth muscle contraction and facilitating gastrointestinal motility. Major signalling events induced by mAChRs include adenylyl cyclase inhibition, phosphoinositide hydrolysis, intracellular Ca2+ mobilisation, myofilament Ca2+ sensitisation, generation of non-selective cationic and chloride currents, K+ current modulation, inhibition or potentiation of voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents and membrane depolarisation. A lack of ligands with a high degree of receptor subtype selectivity and the frequent contribution of multiple receptor subtypes to responses in the same cell type have hampered studies on the signal transduction mechanisms and functions of individual mAChR subtypes. Therefore, novel strategies such as genetic manipulation are required to elucidate both the contributions of specific AChR subtypes to smooth muscle function and the underlying molecular mechanisms. In this article, we review recent studies on muscarinic function in gastrointestinal smooth muscle using mAChR subtype-knockout mice.

Rab43 GTPase directs postsynaptic trafficking and neuron-specific sorting of G protein–coupled receptors

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important modulators of synaptic functions. A fundamental but poorly addressed question in neurobiology is how targeted GPCR trafficking is achieved. Rab GTPases are the master regulators of vesicle-mediated membrane trafficking, but their functions in the synaptic presentation of newly synthesized GPCRs are virtually unknown. Here, we investigate the role of Rab43, via dominant-negative inhibition and CRISPR–Cas9–mediated KO, in the export trafficking of α2-adrenergic receptor (α2-AR) and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) in primary neurons and cells. We demonstrate that Rab43 differentially regulates the overall surface expression of endogenous α2-AR and mAChR, as well as their signaling, in primary neurons. In parallel, Rab43 exerts distinct effects on the dendritic and postsynaptic transport of specific α2B-AR and M3 mAChR subtypes. More interestingly, the selective actions of Rab43 toward α2B-AR and M3 mAChR are neuronal cell specific and dictated by direct interaction. These data reveal novel, neuron-specific functions for Rab43 in the dendritic and postsynaptic targeting and sorting of GPCRs and imply multiple forward delivery routes for different GPCRs in neurons. Overall, this study provides important insights into regulatory mechanisms of GPCR anterograde traffic to the functional destination in neurons.

Critical role of hippocampal muscarinic acetylcholine receptors on memory reconsolidation in mice

Over the years, experimental and clinical evidence has given support to the idea that acetylcholine (Ach) plays an essential role in mnemonic phenomena. On the other hand, the Hippocampus is already known to have a key role in learning and memory. What is yet unclear is how the Ach receptors may contribute to this brain region role during memory retrieval.The Ach receptors are divided into two broad subtypes: the ionotropic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and the metabotropic muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Back in 2010, we demonstrated for the first time the critical role of hippocampal α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in memory reconsolidation process of an inhibitory avoidance response in mice. In the present work, we further investigate the possible implication of hippocampal muscarinic Ach receptors (mAchRs) in this process using a pharmacological approach. By specifically administrating agonists and antagonists of the different mAchRs subtypes in the hippocampus, we found that M1 and M2 but not M3 subtype may be involved in memory reconsolidation processes in mice.

Synthesis, Biological, and Computational Evaluation of Antagonistic, Chiral Hydrobenzoin Esters of Arecaidine Targeting mAChR M1

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are a pivotal constituent of the central and peripheral nervous system. Yet, therapeutic and diagnostic applications thereof are hampered by the lack of subtype selective ligands. Within this work, we synthesized and chemically characterized three different stereoisomers of hydrobenzoin esters of arecaidine by NMR, HR-MS, chiral chromatography, and HPLC-logP. All compounds are structurally eligible for carbon-11 labeling and show appropriate stability in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) and F12 cell culture medium. A competitive radioligand binding assay on Chinese hamster ovary cell membranes comprising the human mAChR subtypes M1-M5 showed the highest orthosteric binding affinity for subtype M1 and a strong influence of stereochemistry on binding affinity, which corresponds to in silico molecular docking experiments. Ki values toward M1 were determined as 99 ± 19 nM, 800 ± 200 nM, and 380 ± 90 nM for the (R,R)-, (S,S)-, and racemic (R,S)-stereoisomer, respectively, highlighting the importance of stereochemical variations in mAChR ligand development. All three stereoisomers were shown to act as antagonists toward mAChR M1 using a Fluo-4 calcium efflux assay. With respect to future positron emission tomography (PET) tracer development, the (R,R)-isomer appears especially promising as a lead structure due to its highest subtype selectivity and lowest Ki value.

Restoring Agonist Function at a Chemogenetically Modified M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor.

Designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) have been successfully employed to activate signaling pathways associated with specific muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) subtypes. The M1 DREADD mAChR displays minimal responsiveness to the endogenous agonist acetylcholine (ACh) but responds to clozapine-N-oxide (CNO), an otherwise pharmacologically inert ligand. We have previously shown that benzyl quinolone carboxylic acid (BQCA), an M1 mAChR positive allosteric modulator (PAM), can rescue ACh responsiveness at these receptors. However, whether this effect is chemotype specific or applies to next-generation M1 PAMs with distinct scaffolds is unknown. Here, we reveal that new M1 PAMs restore ACh function at the M1 DREADD while modulating ACh binding at the M1 wild-type mAChR. Importantly, we demonstrate that the modulation of ACh function by M1 PAMs is translated in vivo using transgenic M1 DREADD mice. Our data provide important insights into mechanisms that define allosteric ligand modulation of agonist affinity vs efficacy and how these effects play out in the regulation of in vivo responses.