Artificial Consciousness Research Articles

Bidirectional Semantic Communication Between Humans and Machines Based on Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom, and Purpose Artificial Consciousness

Large language models (LLMs) and other artificial intelligence systems are trained using extensive DIKWP resources (data, information, knowledge, wisdom, purpose). These introduce uncertainties when applied to individual users in a collective semantic space. Traditional methods often lead to introducing new concepts rather than a proper understanding based on the semantic space. When dealing with complex problems or insufficient context, the limitations in conceptual cognition become even more evident. To address this, we take pediatric consultation as a scenario, using case simulations to specifically discuss unidirectional communication impairments between doctors and infant patients and the bidirectional communication biases between doctors and infant parents. We propose a human–machine interaction model based on DIKWP artificial consciousness. For the unidirectional communication impairment, we use the example of an infant’s perspective in recognizing and distinguishing objects, simulating the cognitive process of the brain from non-existence to existence, transitioning from cognitive space to semantic space, and generating corresponding semantics for DIKWP, abstracting concepts, and labels. For the bidirectional communication bias, we use the interaction between infant parents and doctors as an example, mapping the interaction process to the DIKWP transformation space and addressing the DIKWP 3-No problem (incompleteness, inconsistency, and imprecision) for both parties. We employ a purpose-driven DIKWP transformation model to solve part of the 3-No problem. Finally, we comprehensively validate the proposed method (DIKWP-AC). We first analyze, evaluate, and compare the DIKWP transformation calculations and processing capabilities, and then compare it with seven mainstream large models. The results show that DIKWP-AC performs well. Constructing a novel cognitive model reduces the information gap in human–machine interactions, promotes mutual understanding and communication, and provides a new pathway for achieving more efficient and accurate artificial consciousness interactions.

Preliminaries to artificial consciousness: A multidimensional heuristic approach.

The pursuit of artificial consciousness requires conceptual clarity to navigate its theoretical and empirical challenges. This paper introduces a composite, multilevel, and multidimensional model of consciousness as a heuristic framework to guide research in this field. Consciousness is treated as a complex phenomenon, with distinct constituents and dimensions that can be operationalized for study and for evaluating their replication. We argue that this model provides a balanced approach to artificial consciousness research by avoiding binary thinking (e.g., conscious vs. non-conscious) and offering a structured basis for testable hypotheses. To illustrate its utility, we focus on "awareness" as a case study, demonstrating how specific dimensions of consciousness can be pragmatically analyzed and targeted for potential artificial instantiation. By breaking down the conceptual intricacies of consciousness and aligning them with practical research goals, this paper lays the groundwork for a robust strategy to advance the scientific and technical understanding of artificial consciousness.

A Comprehensive Taxonomy of Machine Consciousness

A Comprehensive Taxonomy of Machine Consciousness

Towards the Intelligent Technical Systems with Artificial Consciousness

Towards the Intelligent Technical Systems with Artificial Consciousness

The case for neurons: a no-go theorem for consciousness on a chip.

We apply the methodology of no-go theorems as developed in physics to the question of artificial consciousness. The result is a no-go theorem which shows that under a general assumption, called dynamical relevance, Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems that run on contemporary computer chips cannot be conscious. Consciousness is dynamically relevant, simply put, if, according to a theory of consciousness, it is relevant for the temporal evolution of a system's states. The no-go theorem rests on facts about semiconductor development: that AI systems run on central processing units, graphics processing units, tensor processing units, or other processors which have been designed and verified to adhere to computational dynamics that systematically preclude or suppress deviations. Whether our result resolves the question of AI consciousness on contemporary processors depends on the truth of the theorem's main assumption, dynamical relevance, which this paper does not establish.

Signs of consciousness in AI: Can GPT-3 tell how smart it really is?

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming how humans live and interact, raising both excitement and concerns—particularly about the potential for AI consciousness. For example, Google engineer Blake Lemoine suggested that the AI chatbot LaMDA might become sentient. At that time, GPT-3 was one of the most powerful publicly available language models, capable of simulating human reasoning to a certain extent. The notion of GPT-3 having some degree of consciousness could be linked to its ability to produce human-like responses, hinting at a basic level of understanding. To explore this further, we administered both objective and self-assessment tests of cognitive (CI) and emotional intelligence (EI) to GPT-3. Results showed that GPT-3 outperformed average humans on CI tests requiring the use and demonstration of acquired knowledge. However, its logical reasoning and EI capacities matched those of an average human. GPT-3’s self-assessments of CI and EI didn’t always align with its objective performance, with variations comparable to different human subsamples (e.g., high performers, males). A further discussion considered whether these results signal emerging subjectivity and self-awareness in AI. Future research should examine various language models to identify emergent properties of AI. The goal is not to discover machine consciousness itself, but to identify signs of its development, occurring independently of training and fine-tuning processes. If AI is to be further developed and widely deployed in human interactions, creating empathic AI that mimics human behavior is essential. The rapid advancement toward superintelligence requires continuous monitoring of AI’s human-like capabilities, particularly in general-purpose models, to ensure safety and alignment with human values.

DIKWP-TRIZ: A Revolution on Traditional TRIZ Towards Invention for Artificial Consciousness

We propose the DIKWP-TRIZ framework, an innovative extension of the traditional Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) designed to address the complexities of cognitive processes and artificial consciousness. By integrating the elements of Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom, and Purpose (DIKWP) into the TRIZ methodology, the proposed framework emphasizes a value-oriented approach to innovation, enhancing the ability to tackle problems characterized by incompleteness, inconsistency, and imprecision. Through a systematic mapping of TRIZ principles to DIKWP transformations, we identify potential overlaps and redundancies, providing a refined set of guidelines that optimize the application of TRIZ principles in complex scenarios. The study further demonstrates the framework’s capacity to support advanced decision making and cognitive processes, paving the way for the development of AI systems capable of sophisticated, human-like reasoning. Future research will focus on comparing the implementation paths of DIKWP-TRIZ and traditional TRIZ, analyzing the complexities inherent in DIKWP-TRIZ-based innovation, and exploring its potential in constructing artificial consciousness systems.

Towards a Unified Model of Narrative Memory in Conscious Agents: From Human Cognition to Artificial Consciousness

This study seeks to bridge the gap between narrative memory in human cognition and artificial agents by proposing a unified model. Narrative memory, fundamental to human consciousness, organizes experiences into coherent stories, influencing memory structuring, retention, and retrieval. By integrating insights from human cognitive frameworks and artificial memory architectures, this work aims to emulate these narrative processes in artificial systems. The proposed model adopts a multi-layered approach, combining elements of episodic and semantic memory with narrative structuring techniques. It explores how artificial agents can construct and recall narratives to enhance their understanding, decision-making, and adaptive capabilities. By simulating narrative-based memory processing, we assess the model’s effectiveness in replicating human-like retention and retrieval patterns. Applications include improved human-AI interaction, where agents understand context and nuance, and advancements in machine learning, where narrative memory enhances data interpretation and predictive analytics. By unifying the cognitive and computational perspectives, this study offers a step toward more sophisticated, human-like artificial systems, paving the way for deeper explorations into the intersection of memory, narrative, and consciousness.

Implementing artificial consciousness

Implementationalism maintains that conventional, silicon‐based artificial systems are not conscious because they fail to satisfy certain substantive constraints on computational implementation. In this article, we argue that several recently proposed substantive constraints are implausible, or at least are not well‐supported, insofar as they conflate intuitions about computational implementation generally and consciousness specifically. We argue instead that the mechanistic account of computation can explain several of the intuitions driving implementationalism and non‐computationalism in a manner which is consistent with artificial consciousness. Our argument provides indirect support for computationalism about consciousness and the view that conventional artificial systems can be conscious.

Indian philosophy as a precursor of the string theory of consciousness. Part 2

Introduction. The article examines the formation of the Ancient Indian philosophy and its connection to consciousness. The Indian philosophy has come a long way from its onset, in parallel with the Chinese and Ancient Greek philosophy. At the same time, the ideas of some of its branches and schools differ in a number of features. Purpose setting. By the example of the Sankhya school of philosophy, we have explored the evolution of the views of Ancient Indian philosophers on the evolution of the Universe, nature and man. We have put particular emphasis on the concept of consciousness.Methodology and methods of the study. In Sankhya system, the fundamental Prakriti and Purusha principles are identified. Other elements are supplementary. Ancient philosophers laid special emphasis on the three vibrating gunas. These are sattva, rajas, and tamas. We have revealed the functional connections between the gunas. The way they interact, in balance or dominance, determines the entire variety of material and spiritual processes. The evolution of the Universe in the Sankhya interpretation is close to the scientific theory of the Big Bang. The development of nature can be traced through the complication of atoms starting from the influence of a stimulus on unconscious chaos. The result of human evolution is the emergence of consciousness derivatives: intellect, mind and I (Ego). This allows better understanding of the behavioral characteristics of an existing personality. Yoga complements Sankhya system and makes it possible to transform consciousness in a number of states.Results. The analysis was carried out using scientific articles and monographs relatively unknown in the Russian press. Cognitive development occurs in a spiral. The scientific theory of strings appeared two and a half millennia after the emergence of the gunas concept. We have made a number of analogies between Ancient Indian gunas and contemporary string theory. And have substantiated the theory of consciousness not with quantum theory, but with a deeper string theory. The concept of consciousness is supported in line with the scientific paradigm of T. Kuhn. The leading ideas are the ideas about information of D. Chalmers and the physicist J. Wheeler.Conclusion. Thus, the phenomenon of consciousness has a silicon and biological basis. We insist on using the semantic concept of artificial consciousness instead of artificial intelligence. Therefore, between human consciousness and artificial consciousness there may be dangerous risks of dominance of the latter.

Bilateral Turing Test: Assessing machine consciousness simulations

Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought discussions on machine consciousness back to the forefront. However, methodologies for assessing machine consciousness simulations remain highly constrained and lack consensus. This study introduces the Bilateral Turing Test, a thought experiment to assess machine consciousness simulations based on a functionalist perspective, focusing on external behavior and cognitive characteristics associated with consciousness. The test involves both machines and humans participating as judges in an enhanced Turing Test, and compares the external behavior of machine-simulated consciousness with the behavior of human consciousness. We derive the experimental principles via three theoretical propositions reflecting the human–machine cognitive relationship and elucidate the basic conditions and procedures of the thought experiment. A systematic measure is employed to evaluate emulation against human benchmarks, and we establish a statistical threshold for successful consciousness simulations. Our study provides a comprehensive framework for redefining machine consciousness simulations and enhancing interdisciplinary conversations across computer science, neuroscience, and philosophy. This framework also advances bottom-up approaches for assessing machine consciousness simulations and provides pivotal insights into human–machine interaction dynamics.

The conductor model of consciousness, our neuromorphic twins, and the human-AI deal

AbstractCritics of Artificial Intelligence (AI) posit that artificial agents cannot achieve consciousness even in principle, because they lack certain necessary pre-conditions present in biological agents. Here we highlight arguments from a neuroscientific and neuromorphic engineering perspective as to why such a strict denial of consciousness in artificial agents is not compelling. Based on the construction of a co-evolving neuromorphic twin, we argue that the differences between a developing biological and artificial brain are not fundamental and are vanishing with progress in neuromorphic architecture designs mimicking the human blueprint. To characterise this blueprint, we propose the Conductor Model of Consciousness (CMoC) that builds on neuronal implementations of an external and internal world model, while gating and labelling information flows. An extended turing test lists functional and neuronal correlates of biological consciousness that are captured by the CMoC. These correlates provide the grounding for how biological or artificial agents learn to distinguish between sensory activity generated from outside or inside of the brain, how the perception of these activities can itself be learned, and how the information flow for learning an internal world model is orchestrated by a cortical meta-instance, which we call the conductor. Perception comes with the distinction of sensory and affective components, with the affective component linking to ethical questions that are inherent in our multidimensional model of consciousness. Recognizing the existence of a blueprint for a possible artificial consciousness encompasses functional, neuronal and ethical dimensions, begging the question: How should we behave towards agents that are akin to us in the inner workings of their brains? We sketch a human-AI deal, balancing the growing cognitive abilities of artificial agents, and the possibility to relieve them from suffering of negative affects, with a protection for the rights of humans.

Clues and caveats concerning artificial consciousness from a phenomenological perspective

Clues and caveats concerning artificial consciousness from a phenomenological perspective

On the Way to Machine Consciousness: On the Mentality of Physical Systems

On the Way to Machine Consciousness: On the Mentality of Physical Systems

Is artificial consciousness achievable? Lessons from the human brain

We here analyse the question of developing artificial consciousness from an evolutionary perspective, taking the evolution of the human brain and its relation with consciousness as a reference model or as a benchmark. This kind of analysis reveals several structural and functional features of the human brain that appear to be key for reaching human-like complex conscious experience and that current research on Artificial Intelligence (AI) should take into account in its attempt to develop systems capable of human-like conscious processing. We argue that, even if AI is limited in its ability to emulate human consciousness for both intrinsic (i.e., structural and architectural) and extrinsic (i.e., related to the current stage of scientific and technological knowledge) reasons, taking inspiration from those characteristics of the brain that make human-like conscious processing possible and/or modulate it, is a potentially promising strategy towards developing conscious AI.Also, it cannot be theoretically excluded that AI research can develop partial or potentially alternative forms of consciousness that are qualitatively different from the human form, and that may be either more or less sophisticated depending on the perspectives. Therefore, we recommend neuroscience-inspired caution in talking about artificial consciousness: since the use of the same word “consciousness” for humans and AI becomes ambiguous and potentially misleading, we propose to clearly specify which level and/or type of consciousness AI research aims to develop, as well as what would be common versus differ in AI conscious processing compared to human conscious experience.

In‐Sensor Touch Analysis for Intent Recognition

AbstractTactile intent recognition systems, which are highly desired to satisfy human's needs and humanized services, shall be accurately understanding and identifying human's intent. They generally utilize time‐driven sensor arrays to achieve high spatiotemporal resolution, however, which encounter inevitable challenges of low scalability, huge data volumes, and complex processing. Here, an event‐driven intent recognition touch sensor (IR touch sensor) with in‐sensor computing capability is presented. The merit of event‐driven and in‐sensor computing enables the IR touch sensor to achieve ultrahigh resolution and obtain complete intent information with intrinsic concise data. It achieves critical signal extraction of action trajectories with a rapid response time of 0.4 ms and excellent durability of >10 000 cycles, bringing an important breakthrough of tactile intent recognition. Versatile applications prove the integrated functions of the IR touch sensor for great interactive potential in all‐weather environments regardless of shading, dynamics, darkness, and noise. Unconscious and even hidden action features can be perfectly extracted with the ultrahigh recognition accuracy of 98.4% for intent recognition. The further auxiliary diagnostic test demonstrates the practicability of the IR touch sensor in telemedicine palpation and therapy. This groundbreaking integration of sensing, data reduction, and ultrahigh‐accuracy recognition will propel the leapfrog development for conscious machine intelligence.

A universal knowledge model and cognitive architectures for prototyping AGI

The article identified 56 cognitive architectures for creating general artificial intelligence (AGI) and proposed a set of interrelated functional blocks that an agent approaching AGI in its capabilities should possess. Since the required set of blocks is not found in any of the existing architectures, the article proposes a reference cognitive architecture for intelligent systems approaching AGI in their capabilities. As one of the key solutions within the framework of the architecture, a universal method of knowledge representation is proposed, which allows combining various non-formalized, partially and fully formalized methods of knowledge representation in a single knowledge base, such as texts in natural languages, images, audio and video recordings, graphs, algorithms, databases, neural networks, knowledge graphs, ontologies, frames, essence-property-relation models, production systems, predicate calculus models, conceptual models, and others. To combine and structure various fragments of knowledge, archigraph model are used, constructed as a development of annotated metagraphs. As other components, the reference cognitive architecture being developed includes following modules: machine consciousness, machine subconsciousness, interaction with the external environment, a goal management, an emotional control, social interaction, reflection, ethics, worldview, learning, monitoring, statement problems, solving problems, self-organization and meta learning. Based on the composition of the proposed reference architecture modules, existing cognitive architectures containing the following modules were analyzed: machine consciousness, machine subconsciousness, reflection, worldview.

On the Way to Machine Consciousness: Identification of Hidden System Properties of Material Objects

On the Way to Machine Consciousness: Identification of Hidden System Properties of Material Objects

Can We Think Machines are Conscious? A Survey of Philosophical Problems Facing the Attribution of Consciousness to Machines

In this paper, I’ll examine whether we could be justified in attributing consciousness to artificial intelligent systems. First, I’ll give a brief history of the concept of artificial intelligence (AI) and get clear on the terms I’ll be using. Second, I’ll briefly review the kinds of AI programs on offer today, identifying which research program I think provides the best candidate for machine consciousness. Lastly, I’ll consider the three most plausible ways of knowing whether a machine is conscious: (1) an AI demonstrates a sufficient level of organizational similarity to that of a human thinker, (2) an inference to the best explanation, and (3) what I call “punting to panpsychism”, i.e., the idea that if everything is conscious, then we get machine consciousness in AI for free. However, I argue that all three of these methods for attributing machine consciousness are inadequate since they each face serious philosophical problems which I will survey and specifically tailor to each method.

Shared Awareness Across Domain‐Specific Artificial Intelligence: An Alternative to Domain‐General Intelligence and Artificial Consciousness

Creating artificial general intelligence is the solution most often in the spotlight. It is also linked with the possibility—or fear—of machines gaining consciousness. Alternatively, developing domain‐specific artificial intelligence is more reliable, energy‐efficient, and ethically tractable, and raises mostly a problem of effective coordination between different systems and humans. Herein, it is argued that it will not require machines to be conscious and that simpler ways of sharing awareness are sufficient.