Reviewed by: War of words: Language, politics and 9/11 by Sandra Silberstein Eve Ng War of words: Language, politics and 9/11. By Sandra Silberstein. London: Routledge, 2002. Pp. xv, 172. ISBN 0415290473. $25. Silberstein applies a critical linguistics approach to several of the discourses in the US surrounding 9/11, particularly the ways in which spoken and written [End Page 188] language, combined with visual imagery, were deployed in the (re)creation of national identity. (Some similar ground is covered by John Collins and Ross Glover’s edited volume, Collateral damage: A user’s guide to America’s new war, New York: New York University Press, 2002.) Key discussions in the book center around the framing of the 9/11 attacks as a ‘war’ against American people and values, the validation of President George Bush and New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani as worthy leaders, public service ads intended to promote tolerance and patriotism, and the ACTA (American Council of Trustees and Alumni) accusations of unpatriotic dissent. Directed at a general audience, the book does not explicate at length academic theories about the role of language in framing events, shaping public perception, and constructing identities. Rather, S generally states the main theses simply and proceeds to support them with her analyses. Early in the book, she writes that ‘through the use of language, we create and recreate particular worlds of understanding’ (1), a claim that underlies much of her discussion. Later on, she makes the major point that the meaning of some instance of language can be multiply interpreted, such that a slogan like ‘I’m an American’, which occurred in a widely screened ad after 9/11, was not in fact understood in the same way by everyone. S’s analysis of CNN’s 9/11 coverage illustrates how the media used language to label what was going on, with constant onscreen headings (e.g. ‘America Under Attack’) that gave a seemingly authoritative—though sourceless—framing of what was happening. Newscasters also had the power to frame stories involving accounts of survivors and rescue workers by their commentary and control of the interview. Perhaps most subtle, however, were the ways that various survivor stories, in which the audience was invited to identify with a common ‘we’ of (decent, innocent) Americans united in grief and anger, became part of a discourse of (re)asserting American national identity. Looking at the statements of Bush in the few days after 9/11, S combines examination of language at the lexical and grammatical levels with rhetorical and discourse analysis to demonstrate how the language of the president, together with media framing of his appearances (notably at the National Cathedral service on September 14), created an image of a strong, capable, and caring leader. Though S understates the point, the contrast between widespread negative perceptions of Bush before 9/11 and his reconstructed public self after it make the transformation particularly remarkable and disturbing. S undertakes a similar sort of analysis for Mayor Giuliani, another political figure who had a significant number of detractors pre-9/11 and virtually none in the immediate weeks following it. Perhaps the most interesting chapter for many academics will be S’s consideration of the Lynne Cheney-led ACTA report, which originally included a list of over 100 professors and their quotes, about the purportedly unpatriotic ‘blame America first’ attitude tainting US campuses. S systematically deconstructs the report, highlighting its misleading use of quotes and its various fallacies, including dangerously reducing dissent to treason. For those who never embraced the mainstream flagwaving sentiment that followed 9/11, this discussion is a timely reminder that the American freedoms which the 9/11 perpetrators were accused of trying to attack are most in danger from the actions of Americans themselves. The book ends a little abruptly, with no general conclusion, discussing news stories aimed at educating Americans about Islam. Perhaps, however, that is consonant with the state of current affairs in which 9/11 continues to loom large in US political rhetoric. Eve Ng Macalester College Copyright © 2004 Linguistic Society of America