Research suggests that relatively stable, fine fraction soil organic matter (FF‐SOM) has almost constant concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur (NPS) per unit of carbon (C), although there are considerable differences in the datasets used. Such differences could, in agricultural situations in particular (where inorganic nutrients are often added), result from substantial concentrations of inorganic‐N, inorganic‐Pand inorganic‐Sthat remain in the soil. We assessed the efficacy of removal of inorganic nutrients with different washing procedures (0.1 or 0.5 mhydrochloric acid solution). Even after repeated additions of inorganic‐N, inorganic‐Sand inorganic‐Pto soil as part of a long‐term incubation experiment, washing soil with 0.1 mHClwas effective at removing residual inorganic‐Nand inorganic‐S, but not effective at removing inorganic‐P. We demonstrate that estimates ofC:N,C:SandC:Pratios inFF‐SOMcan be substantially underestimated when these washing procedures are not carried out as part of the soil analyses. This leads to overestimation of the amounts ofN,PandSthat are required for co‐sequestration ofCduring the formation ofFF‐SOM. BecausePis essential for the formation ofFF‐SOM, more research is needed to obtain an accurate measure of thePrequired per unit ofFF‐SOM. Although washing with 0.1 mHClalso removed someFF‐C, we suggest a method to compensate for this. We tested the procedure on soil with clay contents ranging from 8 to 60%; however, the stronger acid might be more suitable for soil with larger clay contents.HighlightsWhat is the best method to measure the size and stoichiometry of the stable soil organic matter pool?Enlarging this soil organic matter pool could help restore fertility and mitigate climate change.Washing soil with dilute acid can remove excess inorganic nutrients, but it also removes organic carbon.We recommend the size of the pool on unwashed soil and the stoichiometry on washed soil is measured.
Read full abstract