Lymphocyst Formation Research Articles

Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer.

Sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) and dissection (SLND) should be used as an alternative to full inguinofemoral lymph node dissection (IFLND) in select patients with early-stage vulvar cancer. IFLND is associated with high postoperative complications such as wound breakdown, lymphedema, lymphocyst formation, and infection. SLND in select patients offers a safe, effective, and less morbid alternative. Candidates for SLND include patients with a unifocal vulvar tumor less than four centimeters, clinically negative lymph nodes, and no prior inguinofemoral surgeries. SLND should ideally be performed by a high-volume SLN surgeon. Most commonly, SLND is performed using both radiocolloid lymphoscintigraphy (e.g., Technetium-99) and a visual tracer such as blue dye; however, near infrared imaging with indocyanine green injection is becoming more widely adopted. Further prospective studies are needed to examine the safety and efficacy of various techniques for SLND. SLND has been demonstrated to be cost-effective, especially when including perioperative complications. Further studies are needed to demonstrate quality of life differences between IFLND and SLND.

Postoperative lymphocyst formation after pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancers: comparison between laparoscopy and laparotomy

The goal of this study was to evaluate, using definitive diagnostic criteria, the incidence of lymphocyst formation following pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecological cancer, and to compare rates between the approaches of laparoscopy and laparotomy. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical or endometrial cancer between March of 2010 and March of 2016. We defined a lymphocyst as a circumscribed collection of fluid within the pelvic cavity, with a diameter of 2cm or more, as diagnosed with ultrasound or computed tomography. During the six-year observational period, a pelvic lymphadenectomy was conducted in 196 women with clinical stage I uterine cancer; 90 cases underwent laparoscopy, 106 underwent laparotomy. The minimally invasive laparoscopic group had a lower estimated blood loss (p < 0.01), shorter hospital stay (p < 0.01). Lymphocysts were observed in 14.4% (13/90) of the laparoscopy cases, and in 15.1% (16/106) of the laparotomy cases which means no significant difference of lymphocyst (p = 1.00). The median size of symptomatic lymphocyst was significantly larger in laparotomy group than in laparoscopy group (4.8cm v.s. 2.8cm, median) (p = 0.04). Symptomatic lymphocysts were more common in laparotomy [7/90 (7.8%) vs 14/106 (13.2%) (p = 0.253)]. In a retrospective analysis with a strict diagnostic criteria, we could find no statistical difference in lymphocyst occurrence between laparoscopy and laparotomy. The median size of the lymphocyst was bigger and lymphocyst was likely to be symptomatic in the laparotomy group.

Surgical Technique for Sentinel Lymph Node Sampling in Presumed Early-stage Ovarian Cancer

Surgical staging for apparent early-stage ovarian cancer includes systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymph node evaluation to detect occult stage III disease [1]. Although, lymphadenectomy procedure is associated with increased duration of surgery and a 13% risk of lymphocyst formation [2]. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is still investigational, and no standardized approach has been studied. Recent mounting evidence has approved the applicability of SLN technique in early-stage ovarian cancer [3,4]. The objective of this video is to demonstrate a surgical technique for robotic performance of SLN biopsy in presumed early-stage ovarian cancer. Stepwise demonstration of the robotic technique for SLN sampling in presumed early-stage ovarian cancer. This video report is part of an institutional, investigational review board-approved study. Academic tertiary referral center. This video presents our team's robotic technique for SLN sampling in a 37-year-old woman who presented to our center with a 10-cm right complex adnexal mass, suspicious for malignancy. A 27-gauge spinal needle was inserted through the abdominal wall under direct visualization. We injected 0.5 mL of dilute indocyanine green solution (Novadaq Technologies, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) (1.25 mg/mL) subperitoneally into the utero-ovarian ligament. The SLN was checked with the fluorescence-guided camera of the Xi DaVinci robotic system (Sunnyvale, CA). Eight to 10 minutes after the injection, a right para-aortic SLN was identified, and dissection was performed. After dissection, the node was extracted and sent to pathology for evaluation by ultra-staging. The final pathology revealed a stage IA low-grade serous ovarian cancer. SLN sampling appears to be feasible in presumed early-stage ovarian cancer and may allow the avoidance of systematic lymph node dissection in this set of patients.

Impact on lower limb lymphedema of pelvic lymphadenectomy with external iliac lymph nodes left-opened distal lymphatics technique.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of maintaining opened distal lymphatic vessels of external iliac lymph nodes on lymphedema and lymphocyst formation of lower limbs after pelvic lymphadenectomy. Prospective single center observational study was carried out in 83 patients with gynecological malignancies who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy. During the operation, the distal lymphatic vessels of the external iliac lymph nodes were cut off by an ultrasound scalpel or scissors, and the proximal end was closed by bipolar coagulation. The patients were re-examined by a physical examination, ultrasound examination and inquiry of the symptoms within 2 years after the operation to check whether they had lower limb lymphedema and to analyze the presence of lymphedema and lymphocyst of lower limbs and the risk. The incidence of lower limb lymphedema (LLL) was 21.6% (18/83). Among the patients with LLL, 5.5% (1/18) was diagnosed with stage 0 according to the criteria of International Society of Lymphology, 83.3% (15/18) with stage 1, and 11.1% (2/18) with stage 2. Presently, there was no lymphedema diagnosed at stage 3. The incidence of lymphocyst was 7.2% (6/83). Among the patients with lymphocyst, 3.6% (3/83) occurred 1 month after operation, 2.4% (2/83) occurred 3 months after operation and 1.2% (1/83) occurred 6 months after operation. Patients with radiotherapy and abdominal infection were more likely to suffer from LLL (P<0.05). Maintaining opened distal lymphatic vessels of external iliac lymph nodes during pelvic lymphadenectomy is feasible, safe and with a 21.6% and 7.2% of potential lymphedema and lymphocists, respectively.

Incidence, prevalence, and factors associated with lymphedema after treatment for cervical cancer: a systematic review

BackgroundLower limb lymphedema is a frequent and debilitating complication after cervical cancer treatment.ObjectiveTo evaluate the incidence and prevalence of lymphedema after treatment for cervical cancer and evaluate the factors associated...

Incidence of lymphedema in the lower limbs and lymphocyst formation within one year of surgery for endometrial cancer: A prospective longitudinal multicenter study

ObjectiveThe study aimed to determine the incidence of lower limb lymphedema (LLL) after surgery for endometrial cancer (EC) by means of three methods, and to determine the incidence of lymphocysts after one year. MethodsA prospective longitudinal multicenter study was conducted in 14 hospitals in Sweden. Two-hundred-and-thirty-five women with EC were included; 116 underwent surgery that included lymphadenectomy (+LA) and 119 were without lymphadenectomy (−LA). Lymphedema was assessed objectively on four occasions; preoperatively, at 4–6 weeks, six months and one year postoperatively using systematic measurement of leg circumferences, enabling calculation of leg volumes, and a clinical grading of LLL, and subjectively by the patient's perception of lymphedema measured by a lymphedema-specific quality-of-life instrument. Lymphocyst was evaluated by vaginal ultrasonography. ResultsAfter one year the incidence of LLL after increase in leg volume adjusted for body mass index was 15.8% in +LA women and 3.4% in –LA women. The corresponding figures for clinical grading were 24.1% and 11.8%, and for patient-reported perceived LLL 10.7% and 5.1%. The agreement between the modalities revealed fair to moderate correlation between patient-reported LLL and clinical grading, but poor agreement between volume increase and patient-reported LLL or clinical grading. Lymphocysts were found in 4.3% after one year. ConclusionsAlthough the incidence of LLL and lymphocysts after surgery for EC including LA seemed to be relatively high the study demonstrated significant variations in incidence depending on the measurement modality. This emphasizes the need for a ‘gold standard’ of measurement of LLL in clinical practice and research.

A method for reducing lymphorrhea in the postoperative period after axillary lymphadenectomy for metastatic lesion in patients with skin melanoma

Objective. Prevention of prolonged lymphorrhea, postoperative lymphocysts in patients with melanoma metastases after axillary lymph node dissection.&#x0D; Material and methods. Patients with metastases of melanoma in axillary lymph nodes (n = 67) who underwent axillary lymph node dissection were studied. Patients were divided into two groups comparisons (n = 35), which, after surgical intervention in the armpit, installed an active aspiration system according to Redon and the main (n = 32), patients of which, in addition to the draining system, installed an elastic rubber ball with water, which provided additional pressure on the skin. A significant difference (p0.001) was established between the main and comparison groups in the number of hospital days spent by patients in the hospital. For a statistical comparison, the Mann-Whitney test was used, the distribution form was checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The median and interquartile range (Me [Q25%Q75%]) were determined as measures of the average tendency and spread.&#x0D; Results. In the main group, patients with lymphorrhea stopped faster, drainage was removed earlier and the average hospital stay was 3 days shorter than in patients in the comparison group, and lymphocyst formation was not observed in comparison with the comparison group in which this complication was observed 11.4%.&#x0D; Discussion. The duration of patients stay in the hospital directly depended on the date of drainage removal, the time of tissue adhesion and the end of lymphorrhea, the formation of a lymphocyst in the postoperative period, which directly depended on the application of a new technique of additional pressure on the tissues besides vacuum drainage.&#x0D; Conclusion. the installation of hydraulics immediately after the operation leads to a faster gluing of the separated tissues, a reduction in lymphorrhea, and, accordingly, a shorter use of drainage, early removal and discharge of the patient from the hospital, and prevention of the formation of lymphocytes with the corresponding medical and economic effect. Priority certificate No. 2019109858 dated 04/03/2019 was received for the method used.

Feasibility of internal inguinoperitoneal drainage after inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer.

Despite the introduction of sentinel node biopsy in patients with vulvar cancer, still approximately 50% of all patients have to undergo an inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. This is associated with a high incidence of postoperative complications, which may be influenced by inguinal drain management. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a new surgical technique regarding drain management with an inguinoperitoneal drainage. A retrospective analysis of 21 vulvar cancer patients with inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy was conducted. A silicone drain was circularly placed with the perforated end in the groin and the other end in the space of Douglas. The removal after 3months was performed under local anesthesia. All patients were questioned during clinical follow-up regarding their personal experiences with the procedure, the occurrence of complications, and side effects using a clinical questionnaire. In 100% of the patients, the procedure was feasible. Regarding the number of groin punctures due to lymphocyst formation, 15 (71.4%) patients did not need any intervention and 3 (14.3%) patients needed 1-3 punctures. The patient satisfaction with the internal drainage was ranked as good by 17 (81.0%) patients and as moderate by 1 (4.8%) patient. In 3 (14.3%) patients, information about the number of groin punctures and the patient satisfaction were missing. Inguinoperitoneal drainage after inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer patients is feasible and safe and a patient satisfaction of 81% is promising. For definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of this technique, further investigations and prospective multicenter trials are needed.

Technical Aspects of Endosurgical Extraperitoneal Aortic Lymph Node Dissection in Gynaecologic Oncology

Introduction Laparoscopic aortic node dissection can be performed using extraperitoneal techniques. The surgical technique has been made much easier by the development of multifunction instruments, combining sophisticated bipolar thermal fusion and sharp incision, or using harmonic hemostasis. These instruments improve ergonomy, and may reduce the lymphocyst formation rate, the more frequent complication of extraperitoneal lymph node dissection. Robotic assistance is feasible and safe, but that does not provide significant improvement in perioperative outcomes. Laparoscopic or robot-assisted single port has been used by several investigators, which led to the same conclusions. Interestingly, the left lateral extraperitoneal approach can be extended to the left pelvic sidewall, allowing to resect suspicious nodes, sentinel nodes or to complete left pelvic lymph node dissection.

What are the risk factors for lymphocyst formation after endometrial cancer staging?

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for lymphocyst development after endometrial cancer surgical staging.

Lymphedema, serious adverse events, and imaging 1 year after comprehensive staging for endometrial cancer: results from the RASHEC trial.

In the Robot Assisted Surgery for High Risk Endometrial Cancer (RASHEC) trial, patients with high-risk endometrial cancer were randomly assigned to robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) or laparotomy for pelvic and infrarenal para-aortic lymph node dissection. We here report on self-reported lower limb lymphedema (LLL), lymphocyst formation, ascites, and long-term serious adverse events 12 months after surgery. Patients were enrolled between 2013 and 2016, and 96 patients were included in the per protocol analysis, evenly distributed between RALS and laparotomy. Self-reported LLL was recorded using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for endometrial cancer-EN24, assessed before and 12 months after surgery. Computed tomography was assessed at baseline, 3, and 12 months. Medical charts were reviewed for serious adverse events and hospital admissions 31 to 365 days after surgery. At 12 months after laparotomy and RALS, 61% and 50% patients, respectively, reported LLL (p = 0.31). In univariate analysis, the mean score of LLL at 12 months was significantly higher for laparotomy than for RALS (p < 0.05) and for those without abdominal drainage (p = 0.02), but was not independently associated with LLL in the multivariate analysis. Imaging showed no significant difference in lymphocyst formation or ascites between surgical modalities. No difference was found in serious adverse events and admissions to hospital for any reason. There was no agreement between lymphocyst formation or ascites and self-reported LLL. Follow-up 1 year after comprehensive surgical staging for high-risk endometrial cancer showed no differences in self-reported LLL, findings on imaging, or SAE between laparotomy and robot-assisted surgery.

Do Groin Drains Reduce Postoperative Morbidity in Women Undergoing Inguinofemoral Lymphadenectomy for Vulvar Cancer?

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has been widely adopted in the surgical management of women with early-stage vulvar cancer, but many patients require inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL). Following IFL, many surgeons drain the groin to prevent lymphocyst formation despite a lack of evidence to support this practice. Our objective was to investigate whether groin drains after IFL are associated with reduced postoperative morbidity in women undergoing surgery for vulvar cancer. A retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed as having primary vulvar cancer who underwent vulvectomy/radical local excision and unilateral or bilateral IFL was conducted. Cases were ascertained from the weekly outcome reports of a statewide tertiary gynecologic oncology tumor board. Data including postoperative outcomes were abstracted from medical records. Patients were stratified into 1 of 2 groups according to whether a groin drain had been used. Seventy-one patients were included. Inguinal drains were used in 48 patients (67.6%) and 23 patients (32.4%) did not have their groin wound(s) drained. The most common postoperative complications recorded were wound infection (59.2%), groin lymphocyst (32.4%), and cellulitis (25.4%). The mean length of hospital admission was 11.5 days (2-40 days). Compared with patients in whom inguinal drains were placed, those in the "no drain" group had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative groin cellulitis (8.7% vs 25.4% P = 0.039). No significant differences were observed between patients in the "drain" and "no drain" groups in lymphocyst formation, wound infection, return to the operating room, duration of hospital stay, readmission post-discharge, and lower-limb lymphedema. In this study of patients undergoing inguinofemoral dissection for primary vulvar cancer, postoperative cellulitis occurred less frequently in patients without an inguinal drain. The incidence of other postoperative complications was no different whether or not a groin drain was used. Prospective studies may be warranted.

Risk factors and a prediction model for lower limb lymphedema following lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study

BackgroundLower limb lymphedema (LLL) is a chronic and incapacitating condition afflicting patients who undergo lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer. This study aimed to identify risk factors for LLL and to develop a prediction model for its occurrence.MethodsPelvic lymphadenectomy (PLA) with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALA) was performed on 366 patients with gynecologic malignancies at Yaizu City Hospital between April 2002 and July 2014; we retrospectively analyzed 264 eligible patients. The intervals between surgery and diagnosis of LLL were calculated; the prevalence and risk factors were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. We developed a prediction model with which patients were scored and classified as low-risk or high-risk.ResultsThe cumulative incidence of LLL was 23.1% at 1 year, 32.8% at 3 years, and 47.7% at 10 years post-surgery. LLL developed after a median 13.5 months. Using regression analysis, body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.616; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.030–2.535), PLA + PALA (HR, 2.323; 95% CI, 1.126–4.794), postoperative radiation therapy (HR, 2.469; 95% CI, 1.148–5.310), and lymphocyst formation (HR, 1.718; 95% CI, 1.120–2.635) were found to be independently associated with LLL; age, type of cancer, number of lymph nodes, retroperitoneal suture, chemotherapy, lymph node metastasis, herbal medicine, self-management education, or infection were not associated with LLL. The predictive score was based on the 4 associated variables; patients were classified as high-risk (scores 3–6) and low-risk (scores 0–2). LLL incidence was significantly greater in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.440–3.324). The cumulative incidence at 5 years was 52.1% [95% CI, 42.9–62.1%] for the high-risk group and 28.9% [95% CI, 21.1–38.7%] for the low-risk group. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve for the prediction model was 0.631 at 1 year, 0.632 at 3 years, 0.640 at 5 years, and 0.637 at 10 years.ConclusionBMI ≥25 kg/m2, PLA + PALA, lymphocyst formation, and postoperative radiation therapy are significant predictive factors for LLL. Our prediction model may be useful for identifying patients at risk of LLL following lymphadenectomy. Providing an intensive therapeutic strategy for high-risk patients may help reduce the incidence of LLL and conserve the quality of life.

Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in women with gynaecological malignancies.

This is an updated version of an original Cochrane review published in Issue 6, 2014. Pelvic lymphadenectomy is associated with significant complications including lymphocyst formation and related morbidities. Retroperitoneal drainage using suction drains has been recommended as a method to prevent such complications. However, findings from recent studies have challenged this policy. To assess the effects of retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy on lymphocyst formation and related morbidities in women with gynaecological cancer. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 3, 2017) in the Cochrane Library, electronic databases MEDLINE (1946 to March Week 2, 2017), Embase (1980 to 2017 week 12), and the citation lists of relevant publications. We also searched the trial registries for ongoing trials on 20 May 2017. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy in women with gynaecological cancer. Retroperitoneal drainage was defined as placement of passive or active suction drains in pelvic retroperitoneal spaces. No drainage was defined as no placement of passive or active suction drains in pelvic retroperitoneal spaces. We assessed studies using methodological quality criteria. For dichotomous data, we calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We examined continuous data using mean difference (MD) and 95% CI. Since the last version of this review, we have identified no new studies for inclusion. The review included four studies with 571 women. Regarding short-term outcomes (within four weeks after surgery), retroperitoneal drainage was associated with a comparable rate of overall lymphocyst formation when all methods of pelvic peritoneum management were considered together (2 studies; 204 women; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.04 to 13.35; moderate-quality evidence). When the pelvic peritoneum was left open, the rates of overall lymphocyst formation (1 study; 110 women; RR 2.29, 95% CI 1.38 to 3.79) and symptomatic lymphocyst formation (2 studies; 237 women; RR 3.25, 95% CI 1.26 to 8.37) were higher in the drained group. At 12 months after surgery, the rates of overall lymphocyst formation were comparable between the groups (1 study; 232 women; RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.45; high-quality evidence). However, there was a trend toward increased risk of symptomatic lymphocyst formation in the group with drains (1 study; 232 women; RR 7.12, 95% CI 0.89 to 56.97; low-quality evidence). Placement of retroperitoneal tube drains has no benefit in the prevention of lymphocyst formation after pelvic lymphadenectomy in women with gynaecological malignancies. When the pelvic peritoneum is left open, the tube drain placement is associated with a higher risk of short- and long-term symptomatic lymphocyst formation. We found the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach to be moderate to high for most outcomes, except for symptomatic lymphocyst formation at 12 months after surgery, and unclear or low risk of bias.

Clipping during distal external iliac lymphadenectomy increases lower leg lymphedema in patients with carcinoma of the cervix

Objectives: The distal external iliac lymph nodes were reported to be closely related with lower leg lymphedema (LEL). We hypothesized that complete obstruction of lymphatic channel induced from clipping during distal external iliac lymph node dissection could affect lymphedema after radical hysterectomy performed for cervical cancer. Methods: A retrospective review of 553 patients with carcinoma of the cervix who underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy from January 1993 to December 2012 was performed. The authors included patients with FIGO stage I to stage IIA2 cervical cancer and excluded cases with a history of radiation therapy for cervical cancer to evaluate the pure effect of surgery alone. Lymphadenectomy for distal external iliac lymph nodes was defined as dissection of lymph nodes located on the psoas muscle within 3 cm from the inguinal canal. We evaluated the existence and number of clips in the area of the distal external iliac lymph nodes using magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Results: Of a total of 553 cervical cancer patients, clipping on distal external iliac lymph nodes was performed in 283 patients and nonclipping in 270 patients. The patient’s age, body mass index, and the number of removed lymph nodes were not different between the 2 groups. Interestingly, LEL occurred in 15.2% (43 of 283 cases) of the patients who underwent clipping on distal external iliac lymph nodes compared with 5.2% (14 out of 270 cases) of the nonclipping cases (P < .01, OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.75–6.14). The total duration of LEL was significantly longer in the clipping group compared with the nonclipping group (P < .05). Lymphocyst formation was less frequently noted in the clipping group (3.2%, 9 out of 283 cases) compared with the nonclipping group (7.7%, 21 of 270 cases) (P < .05, OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18–0.87). Conclusions: We found that clipping on distal external iliac lymph nodes during lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients was significantly associated with LEL as a postoperative complication. Therefore, for the prevention of LEL, nonclipping on distal external iliac lymph nodes can be suggested as a routine method for pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients.

What Are the Risk Factors for Lymphocyst Formation Apart From Lymphnode Dissection and Lymphnode Count in Gynecologic Malignancy?

Aim: Lymphocyst is one of the most common complications of lymphadenectomy and generally encountered during uro-gynecological oncology surgeries. We aimed to define the risk factors for formation of a lymphocyst in patients with various gynecological cancer types in whom a lymphadenectomy was performed. Methods: This retrospective study was performed on 206 patients. Of the 206 patients, 100 were diagnosed with a lymphocyst, and 106 were assigned to a control group. Laboratory findings and surgical characteristics of the patients were compared. Results: No differences were observed in age, pre-operative hemoglobin; platelet, white blood cell, and lymphocyte counts; or pre-operative albumin level (p = 0.315, 0.500, 0.525, 0.683, 0.740, and 0.97, respectively). A significant effect of the heparin dose × heparin days interaction and lymphocyst formation was observed (p = 0.002). Lymphocysts were most frequently detected in the ovarian cancer subgroup (49 %). Significant differences were detected between the groups in the percentages of patients who underwent CT only and RT only treatments (p = 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). The logistic regression analysis revealed a relationship between the LMWH dose × days interaction and formation of a lymphocyst (OR, 1.10; 95 % CI, 1.0-1.13; p = 0.01). Conclusion: The association between total LMWH dose administered and the formation of lymphocysts in patients with gynecological pelvic cancer was investigated for the first time. Significant relationship between heparin dose × days and lymphocyst formation was found. Although anticoagulation with LMWH is essential for preventing thromboembolism, it should be used appropriately to prevent other complications, such as bleeding and lymphocysts.

Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.

ObjectivePelvic autonomic nerve preservation during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer has become a priority in recent years. This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (L-NSRH) using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) in women with cervical cancer.MethodsPatients with stage IB1 or IIA1 cervical cancer underwent L-NSRH with pelvic lymphadenectomy. The patients were randomly assigned to receive L-NSRH using a CUSA (CUSA group; n = 24) or using other techniques (non-CUSA group; n = 21). Recovery of bladder function (indwelling catheter time and time to spontaneous voiding) blood loss, duration of hospital stay, lymph node harvesting, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. Patients were followed for up to 3 years to determine the maintenance of effect.ResultsAll patients underwent L-NSRH successfully. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the CUSA than in the non-CUSA group (P = 0.005). Length of hospital stay (P = 0.006) and indwelling catheter time (P = 0.008) were both significantly reduced in the CUSA group compared with that in the non-CUSA group. The spontaneous voiding rate 10 days postoperatively was 95.8% with CUSA and 85.7% with non-CUSA techniques. Two patients developed postoperative complications in the CUSA group as did 3 patients in the non-CUSA group. These were cases of lymphocyst formation or urinary tract infection.ConclusionsLaparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy using CUSA was safe and feasible in patients with cervical cancer. Our results provide initial evidence that L-NSRH using CUSA preserves pelvic autonomic nerve function.

Feasibility and Safety of Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review.

ObjectiveTo systematically review previous studies and to evaluate the feasibility and safety of video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) in vulvar cancer.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive review of studies published through September 2014 to retrieve all relevant articles. The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wan Fang Data and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched for all relevant studies published in English or Chinese through September 2014. Data were abstracted independently by two reviewers, and any differences were resolved by consensus.ResultsA total of 9 studies containing 249 VEIL procedures involving 138 patients were reviewed. Of the 249 VEIL procedures, only 1 (0.4%) was converted to an open procedure for suturing because of injury to the femoral vein. The range of operative time was 62 to 110 minutes, and the range of estimated blood loss was 5.5 to 22 ml. The range of the number of harvested lymph nodes was 7.3 to 16. The length of hospital stay varied from 7 to 13.6 days across reports. The incidence of lymph node metastasis was 19.7% (27/138), and the recurrence rate was 4.3% (3/70) within 3 to 41 months of follow-up. One or more short-term complications were documented in 18 of 138 (13.0%) patients. Complications after VEIL were observed in 14 (10.13%) patients and in 15 (6.0%) of the VEIL cases, including major lymphocyst formation in 9 (3.6%), lymphorrhea in 2 (0.8%), inguinal wound infection without wound breakdown in 3 (1.2%) and lymphedema in 1 (0.4%).ConclusionsVEIL appears to be a feasible procedure in the management of vulvar cancer. There may be potential benefits that result in lower morbidity compared to traditional methods, but this has yet to be objectively proven.

Prevalence, classification, and risk factors for postoperative lower extremity lymphedema in women with gynecologic malignancies: a retrospective study.

Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) is a major long-term complication of radical surgery. We aimed to estimate the incidence and grading of LEL in women who underwent lymphadenectomy and to evaluate risk factors associated with LEL. We retrospectively reviewed 358 patients with cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer who underwent transabdominal complete systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy between 1997 and 2011. Lower extremity lymphedema was graded according to criteria of the International Society of Lymphology. Incidence of LEL and its correlation with various clinical characteristics were investigated using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards methods. Overall incidence of LEL was 21.8% (stage 1, 60%; stage 2, 32%; and stage 3, 8%). Cumulative incidence increased with observation period: 12.9% at 1 year, 20.3% at 5 years, and 25.4% at 10 years. Age, cancer type, stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics), body mass index, hysterectomy type, lymphocyst formation, lymph node metastasis, and chemotherapy were not associated with LEL. Multivariate analysis confirmed that removal of circumflex iliac lymph nodes (hazard ratio [HR], 4.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.09-8.77; P < 0.0001), cellulitis (HR, 3.48; 95% CI, 2.03-5.98; P < 0.0001), and number of removed lymph nodes (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99; P = 0.038) were independent risk factors for LEL. Postoperative LEL incidence increased over time. The results of the present study showed a significant correlation with removal of circumflex iliac lymph nodes and cellulitis with the incidence of LEL. Multicenter or prospective studies are required to clarify treatment efficacies.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer.

The objective of this study was to determine the costs and outcomes of inguinal-femoral lymph node dissection (IF-LND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for the management of early-stage vulvar cancer. A cost-effectiveness model compared 2 different strategies for the management of early-stage vulvar cancer: (1) vulvectomy and SLNB and (2) vulvectomy and IF-LND. Probabilities of inguinal-femoral node metastases and recurrence rates associated with each strategy were estimated from published data. Actual payer costs of surgery and radiation therapy were obtained using 2012 CPT codes and Medicare payment information. Rates and costs of postoperative complications including lymphedema, lymphocyst formation, and infection were estimated and included in a separate model. Cost-effectiveness ratios were determined for each strategy. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate pertinent uncertainties in the models. For the estimated 3000 women diagnosed annually with early-stage vulvar cancer in the United States, the annual cost of the SLNB strategy is $65.2 million compared with $76.8 million for the IF-LND strategy. Three-year inguinal-femoral recurrence-free survival was similar between groups (96.9% vs 97.3%). This translates into a lower cost-effectiveness ratio for the SLNB strategy ($22,416), compared with the IF-LND strategy ($26,344). When adding complication costs to the model, cost-effectiveness ratios further favor the SLNB strategy ($23,711 vs $31,198). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the SLNB strategy remained cost-effective until the recurrence rate after a negative sentinel lymph node approaches 9%. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is the most cost-effective strategy for the management of patients with early-stage vulvar cancer due to lower treatment costs and lower costs due to complications.