Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis Surgery Research Articles

Comparison of the rate of concomitant proximal venous stenosis between the upper and lower extremities in patients with secondary lymphedema undergoing lymphaticovenous anastomosis

BackgroundConcomitant iatrogenic proximal venous stenosis increases venous pressure and can be a risk factor for unfavorable outcomes of lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) in extremities with secondary lymphedema. This study investigated the frequency and relevant factors of venous stenosis in patients diagnosed with secondary lymphedema who underwent LVA. MethodsPatients who underwent preoperative computed tomographic venography (CTV) and LVA for secondary lymphedema of the extremities from October 2018 to March 2022 were included. The incidence of proximal venous stenosis in the affected limb on preoperative CTV and the rate of endovascular intervention were compared between upper and lower extremities. Factors affecting proximal venous stenosis were identified through multivariable analysis using independent variables, including patient age, body mass index, comorbidities, smoking history, radiation therapy, duration of lymphedema, and location of lymphedema. ResultsA total of 211 patients were analyzed, including 83 patients with upper extremity and 128 patients with lower extremity lymphedema. The incidence of proximal venous stenosis in the preoperative CTV was 32.5% and 7.8% in upper extremity, and lower extremity lymphedema, respectively (P < .001). The incidence of venous stenosis requiring endovascular intervention was significantly higher in the upper extremity compared with the lower extremity (16.9% vs 6.3%; P = .014). In multivariable analysis, risk factors affecting incidence of venous stenosis requiring endovascular intervention was the patient age (P = .007) and upper extremity (P = .009). ConclusionsPreoperative evaluation and treatment of venous stenosis in extremities with secondary lymphedema are necessary before LVA surgery, particularly in upper extremity lymphedema.

Photoacoustic lymphangiography before and after lymphaticovenular anastomosis.

BackgroundLymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure used to treat lymphedema. Volumetric measurements and quality-of-life assessments are often performed to assess the effectiveness of LVA, but there is no method that provides information regarding postoperative morphological changes in lymphatic vessels and veins after LVA. Photoacoustic lymphangiography (PAL) is an optical imaging technique that visualizes the distribution of light-absorbing molecules, such as hemoglobin or indocyanine green (ICG), and provides three-dimensional images of superficial lymphatic vessels and the venous system simultaneously. In this study, we performed PAL in lymphedema patients before and after LVA and compared the images to evaluate the effect of LVA.MethodsPAL was performed using the PAI-05 system in three patients (one man, two women) with lymphedema, including one primary case and two secondary cases, before LVA. ICG fluorescence lymphography was performed in all cases before PAL. Follow-up PAL was performed between 5 days and 5 months after LVA.ResultsPAL enabled the simultaneous visualization of clear lymphatic vessels that could not be accurately seen with ICG fluorescence lymphography and veins. We were also able to observe and analyze morphological changes such as the width and the number of lymphatic vessels and veins during the follow-up PAL after LVA.ConclusionsBy comparing preoperative and postoperative PAL images, it was possible to analyze the morphological changes in lymphatic vessels and veins that occurred after LVA. Our study suggests that PAL would be useful when assessing the effect of LVA surgery.

Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis for Patients with Lymphedema of the Upper Extremity at Siriraj Hospital: A Quantitative Analysis Study

Background: Lymphedema occurrence in patients that underwent breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) treatment can become a major problem. Over the past decade, lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) has become widely utilized. This surgery replicates the body’s system by creating a connection between the lymphatic tracts and the venous system and replaces a damaged lymphatic system caused by the consequences from BCRL. Objective: To analyze the results of LVA surgery targeting particularly the upper extremity areas from BCRL patients at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was based on the medical records of patients that underwent LVA surgery between January 2010 and August 2018. Lymphoscintigraphy examination (⁹⁹ᵐTc-dextran lymphoscintigraphy) or ICG lymphography was performed to confirm the physician’s diagnosis. The present study aimed to compare the arm circumference size and the rate of infection of patients between the pre-surgery and post-surgery of LVA. Results: One hundred eighteen patients underwent the LVA operation and were included in the study. They had an average of 3.2±1.3 anastomoses. The average duration for the follow-up after surgery was 32 weeks. The different sizes in both arms were 5.8±1.6 cm and 5.5±1.4 cm, which were measured from 10 centimeters above and below the elbows, respectively. Comparing the sizes of the arms based on pre-surgery and post-surgery measurements, the arm circumference decreased by 0.9±0.6 centimeters (15.5%) and 0.9±0.4 centimeters (16.4%) post-surgery for the position above and below the elbow, respectively. The number of infections decreased from 1.9±0.8 times per year to 0.8±0.1 times per year. However, it was found that the rate of applying skin-care treatments in patients was relatively low at 3.4%. Conclusion: The authors’ revealed that LVA surgery of the upper extremity is one of the most effective treatments for lymphedema patients. According to the authors experience in Siriraj Hospital, this treatment is not only decreasing the size of the limb, but it can also minimize the infection rate. However, most patients note that other additional treatments, such as elastic bandage, elastic stocking, or skin-care treatment, are still necessary. Keywords: Lymphedema, Lymphatic obstruction, Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema (BCRL), Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA)

The application of indocyanine green (ICG) and near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging for assessment of the lymphatic system in reconstructive lymphaticovenular anastomosis surgery

ABSTRACT Introduction Lymphedema has traditionally been managed through noninvasive means with complete decongestive therapy. However, complete decongestive therapy is an intensive program that requires lifelong adherence by patients with lymphedema. More recently, reconstructive surgical procedures have shown promise in improving lymphedema by physiologically restoring lymphatic function. One of these types of procedures, lymphaticovenular anastomosis, relies on technological advances in imaging, particularly indocyanine green lymphangiography. Areas covered This article reviews indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging. In addition, this article discusses the application of this imaging to the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative assessment of the lymphatic system in the setting of lymphaticovenular anastomosis surgery. Expert opinion Indocyanine green lymphangiography offers significant advantages over other types of imaging of the lymphatic system. In the future, it is hopeful that additional options for these imaging devices will become available which may increase their accessibility by centers interested in performing reconstructive lymphatic surgery, including in relation to cost. Finally, more studies with higher levels of evidence are needed to better define the long-term outcomes associated with lymphatic surgery including LVA. In this regard, practitioners should fully harness the information conferred by ICG lymphangiography as both a clinical and research tool.

The Direct Observation of Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis Patency with Photoacoustic Lymphangiography.

It is difficult to evaluate the postoperative patency of lymphaticovenular anastomosis, but this evaluation is essential for determining surgical results. When using the current standard modality, near-infrared fluorescent lymphography, it is difficult to observe patency if the anastomotic point is veiled by dermal backflow. In this study, we used a new photoacoustic imaging device, PAI-05, to check the patency of anastomosis. We performed photoacoustic lymphangiography after lymphaticovenular anastomosis surgery. By digitally subtracting the superficial area, we can examine an area deeper than the dermal backflow, which is not visible by near-infrared fluorescent lymphography. The connection between the lymphatic vessel and the venule observed in the image is an indication of the patency of anastomosis. However, in a non-patent anastomosed site, the lymphatic vessel has a gap that separates it from the venule at the anastomosed site. Although photoacoustic lymphangiography cannot be used to visualize the lymphatic vessels that are not contrasted by indocyanine green, the resulting high-resolution images and clear anastomosis evaluation afforded by it will contribute to the development of future lymphedema treatments.

Microsurgery for management of primary and secondary lymphedema

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) in patients with lymphedema. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of 70 patients suffering from primary or secondary lymphedema who underwent LVA surgery with indocyanine green fluorescence lymphangiography. Postoperative evaluation included qualitative and quantitative volumetric assessment and analysis. Limb volume was measured by circumferential tape measurement volumetric method, in which the limb is subdivided into five segments and each segment's circumference is measured. ResultsLVA was performed in 70 patients, 22 with primary lymphedema and 48 with secondary lymphedema. The difference in preoperative upper limb volume was 35% with mean postoperative follow-up of 9 months. The mean number of lymphovenous bypasses was 3.9. The reduction in limb volume at 3, 6, and 12 months was 40.4%, 41%, and 45%, respectively. Patients with early-stage lymphedema had significantly higher volume reductions than patients with late-stage lymphedema at 3, 6, and 12 months (48% vs 18%, 49% vs 22%, and 65% vs 31%; P < .001). For lower extremity lymphedema, the preoperative volume differential was 25.5%. The mean postoperative follow-up was 9 months. The reduction in limb volume at 3, 6, and 12 months was 28%, 37%, and 39%, respectively. ConclusionsLVA surgery is a safe and effective method of reducing lymphedema severity, especially in upper extremity lymphedema at an earlier disease stage.

Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis for Treatment of Lymphedema Developed After Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

ObjectiveSecondary lymphedema of the extremities usually develops well after lymph node dissection or radiation therapy in oncologic surgery. In this report, we present a case of lymphedema developed after liver transplantation and treatment by lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA). MethodsA 52-year-old man was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma in April 2016, and a liver transplantation was performed in June 2016. After the liver transplantation, left lower leg swelling developed, and the symptom became severe for around a year. Two years after liver transplantation, lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green lymphography were performed, and the patient was diagnosed with lymphedema caused by proximal lymphatic obstruction. LVA was performed at the ankle and superior knee areas. ResultsThe difference between the left and right knee circumference was decreased from 5.3 cm to 3.4 cm at 6 months postoperatively. The lower extremity lymphedema index of the left leg was decreased from 291.9 to 288.1 at 6 months after surgery. A quality of life measure for limb lymphoedema survey showed that all 4 categories (function, appearance, symptoms, and mood) were improved at 6 months after surgery. ConclusionLymphedema can develop after liver transplantation, and early LVA surgery can be effective for the treatment of lymphedema developed after liver transplantation.

Technical pearls in lymphatic supermicrosurgery.

Lymphedema is becoming a major public issue with improvement of cancer survival rate, as the disease is incurable and progressive in nature, and the number of cancer survivor with lymphedema is increasing over time. Surgical treatment is recommended for progressive lymphedema, especially when conservative therapies are ineffective. Among various lymphedema surgeries, supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is becoming popular with its effectiveness and least invasiveness. There are many technical knacks and pitfalls in LVA surgery. In preoperative evaluation, indocyanine green lymphography is recommended for considering indication and incision sites. Intraoperatively, intravascular stenting method, temporary lymphatic expansion maneuver, field-rotating retraction, and several navigation methods are useful. The most important postoperative care is immediate compression after LVA surgery. Compression is critical to keep lymphatic pressure higher than venous pressure, allowing continuous lymph-to-venous bypass flow. These technical pearls should be shared with lymphedema surgeons for better lymphedema management.

The Long-term Patency of Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Lymphedema is a condition that can greatly affect patient's quality of life. Promising results have been described with lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) in the treatment of lymphedema. It is currently unknown at what rate anastomoses remain functional after a longer follow-up. The aim of this study was to determine LVA patency at 1-year follow-up. Retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent LVA surgery. Patients who had indocyanine green lymphography performed at 12 months' follow-up after LVA were included in this study. Volume measurements were performed prior to surgery and at 6 and 12 months' follow-up. Patients quality of life was measured prior to surgery and at 6 months' follow-up. Twelve patients met inclusion criteria. In total, 15 (56.5%) of 23 LVAs were considered patent. In 8 patients (66.7%), at least 1 patent LVA was visible. The volume difference between the healthy and affected arms decreased 32.3% on average. Quality of life increased with 1.4 points on average. This study is, to our knowledge, the first to evaluate long-term patency of LVA in upper limb lymphedema. Our study demonstrates that at least 56.5% of the anastomoses created are patent after 1-year follow-up.

Lymphatic vessel diameter in female pelvic cancer-related lower extremity lymphedematous limbs.

Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) has become one of the useful surgical treatments for compression-refractory lower extremity lymphedema (LEL). It is important to anastomose larger lymphatic vessels with abundant lymph flows in LVA surgery. This study aimed to clarify factors associated with lymphatic vessel diameter. One hundred thirty-four LEL patients who underwent pre-operative indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography and LVA from June 2009 to August 2014 in a single institution were included in this retrospective observational study. Clinical, ICG lymphography, and intraoperative findings were collected from medical charts. A lymphatic vessel with external diameters of 0.5 mm or larger was defined as a large lymphatic vessel (LLV). Independent factors associated with LLV were identified using logistic regression analysis. Nine hundred sixty-two lymphatic vessels were identified, among which 438 (45.5%) were LLVs. Independent factors associated with LLV were older age (odds ration [OR], 1.408; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.026-1.931; P = 0.034), positive history of radiation (OR, 1.634; 95%CI 1.228-2.173; P = 0.001), incision site in the thigh/lower leg compared with in the groin (OR, 1.617/1.685; 95%CI 1.076-2.432/1.148-2.473; P = 0.021/0.008). Inverse associations were observed in S-region/D-region on ICG lymphography compared with L-region (OR, 0.537/0.048; 95%CI, 0.397-0.726/0.006-0.371; P < 0.001/0.004). D-region on ICG lymphography had the lowest OR to find LLV, representing that lymphatic vessels found in D-region on ICG lymphography would be significantly smaller than those in L-region. In LVA surgery, D-region should be avoided.

Effective and efficient lymphaticovenular anastomosis using preoperative ultrasound detection technique of lymphatic vessels in lower extremity lymphedema

Identification of functional lymphatic vessels and localization of lymphatic vessels are important for lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA). Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography is useful for localization of superficial lymphatic vessels where dermal backflow is not observed, but not for lymphatic vessels in deep layer or where dermal backflow is observed. Ultrasound has been applied in LVA and is considered useful for localization of lymphatic vessels with ICG lymphography cannot be visualized. Fifty-five secondary lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) patients who underwent LVA were classified into two groups, ultrasound-detection-of-lymphatic group (US group, n = 29) and non-ultrasound-detection-of-lymphatic group (non-US group, n = 26), and assessed. Sensitivity and specificity to detect lymphatic vessel were evaluated in US group. Intraoperative findings, required time for dissecting lymphatic vessels and veins, length of skin incision, and postoperative lymphedematous volume reduction were compared between the groups. Lymphatic vessels were detected in all incisions in both groups. LVA resulted in 232 anastomoses in US group and 210 anastomoses in non-US group. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for detection of lymphatic vessels were 88.2% and 92.7%, respectively. Diameter of lymphatic vessels found in US group was significantly larger than that in non-US group (0.66 ± 0.18 vs 0.45 ± 0.20 mm; P = 0.042). Time required for dissecting lymphatic vessels and veins in US group was shorter than that in non-US group (9.2 ± 1.7 vs 14.7 ± 2.4 min; P = 0.026). LEL index reduction was significantly greater in US group than that in non-US group (26.7 ± 13.6 vs 7.8 ± 11.3; P = 0.031). Ultrasound-guided detection of lymphatic vessels for lymphedema was performed with high precision, and allows easier and more effective LVA surgery.

Sequential Anastomosis for Lymphatic Supermicrosurgery

Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is becoming a treatment option for progressive lymphedema. Various types of LVA such as end-to-end, end-to-side, side-to-end, and side-to-side are performed to improve the treatment efficacy. We applied sequential anastomosis for LVA surgery, in which 2 lymphatic vessels were anastomosed to 1 venule using side-to-side and side-to-end anastomoses. Six lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) patients who underwent sequential anastomosis were included in this study. Feasibility, anastomosis patency, and treatment effect of the method were evaluated. Six sequential anastomoses were performed on 6 lymphedematous limbs. All sequential anastomoses showed good anastomosis patency after completion of anastomoses. A significant decrease in LEL index was seen postoperatively (244.0 ± 14.6; postoperative LEL index vs 263.5 ± 19.4; preoperative LEL index, P = 0.002). Sequential anastomosis can divert both normograde and retrograde lymph flows from 2 lymphatic vessels into 1 venule. Sequential LVA is a useful method to increase lymph flow bypasses, when there are fewer venules than lymphatic vessels.

Minimally Invasive Lymphatic Supermicrosurgery (MILS)

Among various surgical treatments, lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA), which bypasses congested lymph into venous circulation, is the least invasive surgical treatment. However, it usually entails skin incisions of around 3 cm, and operation time of around 4 hours. With multiple supermicrosurgeons under guidance of indocyanine green lymphography, LVAs can be simultaneously performed under local anesthesia within approximately 2 hours via small skin incisions with length less than 1 cm, allowing minimally invasive lymphatic supermicrosurgery (MILS). We performed MILS on 11 limbs of compression-refractory peripheral lymphedema cases. Length of skin incision for LVA ranged from 1 to 9 mm. Average operation time was 1.82 hours. Of the 11 limbs, 10 showed postoperative volume reduction. Indocyanine green lymphography clearly visualizes superficial lymph flows, which helps us to decide precise skin incision sites and find lymphatic vessels in LVA surgery, shortening skin incision length and operation time. Minimally invasive lymphatic supermicrosurgery can serve as the most reasonable treatment of compression-refractory peripheral lymphedema.

Modified lambda-shaped lymphaticovenular anastomosis with supermicrosurgical lymphoplasty technique for a cancer-related lymphedema patient

Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) has become a useful option for the treatment of compression-refractory lymphedema with its effectiveness and less invasiveness. It is important to make as many bypasses as possible for better treatment results of LVA operation. We report a secondary lymphedema case successfully treated using a modified lambda-shaped LVA. A 62-year-old female with secondary lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) refractory to conservative treatments underwent LVA operation. A modified lambda-shaped LVA was performed at the left groin. In modified lambda-shaped LVA, two lymphatic vessels were transected, and both ends of the proximal and distal sides were converged respectively for an end-to-side and end-to-end anastomoses to one vein. Using modified lambda-shaped LVA, four lymph flows of two lymphatic vessels could be bypassed into a vein. Six months after the LVA surgery, her left LEL index decreased from 261 to 247, indicating edematous volume reduction. Modified lambda-shaped LVA effectively bypasses all lymph flows from two lymphatic vessels, when only one large vein can be found in the surgical field.

Near-infrared illumination system-integrated microscope for supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis

Lymphatic supermicrosurgery, lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA), is becoming a treatment option for progressive lymphedema with its effectiveness and minimal invasiveness. It is important to detect and anastomose large functional lymphatic vessels for LVA surgery. This study aimed to evaluate usefulness of a near-infrared illumination system-integrated microscope for lymphatic supermicrosurgery. We performed LVA on 12 lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) patients with or without intraoperative microscopic indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography guidance. An operating microscope equipped with an integrated near-infrared illumination system (OME-9000; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used for intraoperative microscopic ICG lymphography guidance. Feasibility, anastomosis patency, and treatment effect of the method were evaluated. Forty LVAs were performed (24 LVAs with intraoperative microscopic ICG lymphography-guidance on 7 limbs, and 16 LVAs without the guidance on 5 limbs). Lymphatic vessels were enhanced by intraoperative microscopic ICG lymphography in 11 of 12 skin incision sites. Time required for detection and dissection of lymphatic vessels in cases with intraoperative microscopic ICG lymphography guidance was significantly shorter than that in cases without the guidance (2.3 ± 1.7 min vs. 6.5 ± 4.0 min, P = 0.010). There was no statistically significant difference in LEL index reduction between cases with and without intraoperative microscopic ICG lymphography guidance (18.3 ± 5.5 vs. 15.0 ± 5.5, P = 0.337). Intraoperative microscopic ICG lymphography visualized lymphatic vessels, which helps a lymphatic supermicrosurgeon to find and dissect lymphatic vessels earlier.

Selection of anastomosis type for lymphaticovenular anastomosis

We read with great interest the article entitled “pshaped lymphaticovenular anastomosis for head and neck lymphoedema: a preliminary study” by Ayestaray et al. (J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Oct 4 [Epub ahead of print]). Their work is of clinical significance in that they reported case series of head and neck lymphoedema successfully treated with supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA), because head and neck lymphoedema treatment is challenging due to difficulty of compression therapy. I would like to discuss how to select anastomosis type of LVA, and want to make some comments on this matter. An operator of LVA should select an appropriate anastomosis type according to vessels available in a surgical field. There are 4 basic anastomosis types of LVA; end-to-end (EeE), end-to-side (EeS), side-to-end (SeE), and side-toside (SeS). Regarding selection of anastomosis type in LVA surgery, we lymphatic supermicrosurgeon should take 3 points into consideration; venous backflow rate, technical difficulty, and bypass efficacy. As we reported previously, venous backflow rate is high in EeS anastomosis compared with EeE or SeE anastomosis, EeE anastomosis is technically easiest, and SeE and SeS anastomosis can bypass lymph fluid more efficiently compared with EeE and EeS anastomosis. Therefore, I usually perform LVA in a SeE manner, because SeE anastomosis carries a low risk of venous backflow and can bypass both normoand retrograde lymph flows via one anastomosis. When a lymphatic vessel is too sclerotic to create a side wall for SeE anastomosis, we perform EeE anastomosis or l-shaped (EeE and EeS) anastomosis, because EeE anastomosis is technically easy and carries a low risk of venous backflow. When a vein

A modified side‐to‐end lymphaticovenular anastomosis

Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a useful treatment for compression-refractory lymphedema with its effectiveness and minimal invasiveness. However, LVA requires supermicrosurgery, where lymphatic vessels with a diameter of 0.5 mm or smaller are anastomosed using 11-0 or 12-0 suture. To make LVA easier and safer, we adopted a modified side-to-end (S-E) anastomosis in LVA surgery. We performed modified S-E LVAs in 14 limbs of female patients with lower extremity lymphedema (LEL). In modified S-E LVA, lateral windows with a length of 1.0 mm or longer were created on a lymphatic vessel and a vein, respectively, and side-to-side (S-S) anastomosis was established with 10-0 continuous suture. After completion of S-S anastomosis, the vein distal to the anastomosis site was ligated to prevent venous backflow and subsequent thrombosis at the anastomosis site. Lymphedematous volume was evaluated preoperatively and at postoperative 6 months using LEL index. All the 24 modified S-E anastomoses could be completed without difficulty or revision for anastomosis, and showed good patency after completion of anastomosis. Postoperatively, LEL indices significantly decreased compared with preoperative LEL index (255.9 ± 14.1 vs. 274.9 ± 22.2, P < 0.001). Modified S-E LVA can efficaciously divert lymph flows into venous circulation without performing supermicrosurgical anastomosis.