21129 Background: Many prognostic factors for breast cancer are known, of those, clinical , histological, genetical and the socioeconomic status are considered important for the outcome of these patients. The objective of our study vas to evaluate the Socioeconomic status as an independent factor for survival Methods: Clinical records of node negative clinical stage I- II patients treated at the institution from 1980 to 1996 were reviewed . We included those initially treated with surgery, available paraphine blocks, follow up of at five years (the ones that had no recurrence). They were divided in two groups: 1: Lower socioeconomic status, economically deprived and 2: medium low to high status. The slides were reviewed s and the blocks were processed for immuno-histochemistry: steroid receptors, Her-2, p 53 and CD 34. The analysis was performed with X2, , t test and log rank for difference in survival Results: A total of 81 patients were studied, 35 in group 1, and 46 in group 2. Mean age for groups 1 and 2 was of 52 (28–74) and 52.9 (28–83) years respectively (p=0.39). Were stage I in group 1 8, II-28. In Group 2 were stage I, 12, II-34 (p=0.87). Patients in both groups were treated with surgery alone, with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy, without statistical significance for treatment.Vascular or lymphatic permeation was observed in 20 and 22 patients from groups 1 and 2 respectively (p=0.40). Mean SBR was of 7.2 and 7.1 respectively for groups 1 and 2 (p=0.54) Estrogen receptor was present in 10 and 11 patients (p=0.63) and progesterone receptor in 8 and 6 (p0.25) for each group. Her-2 was over expressed in 12 and 17 patients from group 1 and 2, p53 in 6 and 14 respectively (p=0.17)and CD34 in 7 and 6 for both groups respectively ( p=0.40). Median survival was of 225 months for group 1 and not reached at 243 months for group 2, with 90.22% alive, p= 0.005 Conclusions: According to our results, in this group of well studied patients, the only significant factor observed that had an impact over survival was the socioeconomic status. None of the clinical, histological or genetical variables showed significance. We think that prospective studies with special emphasis on the socioeconomic status have to be carried out in order to try to explain the differences that we observed. No significant financial relationships to disclose.