Lymphadenectomy For Gastric Cancer Research Articles

Results of laparoscopic total gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer

Background: Evaluation the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic total gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A prospective descriptive study of 45 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy at Hue Central Hospital and Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital between January 2019 and February 2022. Results: The mean age was 56.9 ± 12.5 years. The male/female ratio was 1.04/1. 57.8% of patients had ASA 2. 46.7% of tumor was at the middle part of stomach. The percent of patients with tumors at stage IIIA was 24.4%. Poor differentiated tumor had the percent of 37.8%, 17.8% of patients had signet ring cell carcinoma. The average operation time was 219.6 ± 68.7 minutes. The mean blood loss was 441.4 ± 426.3 ml. The average number of dissected lymph nodes was 17.1 ± 9.3. 22.2% of patients had complications, the percent of Clavien-Dindo grade III complications was 8,9%. The length of post-operative was 11.6 ± 3.7 days. The overall survival time was 35.4 ± 2.6 months. 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-years overall survival rates were 91.1%, 70.3%, 59.9% và 52.4%. Conclusion: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer appears to be a safe, feasible and effective procedure. Key words: gastric cancer, laparoscopic, total gastrectomy.

ASO Author Reflections: A Green Eye on Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer.

ASO Author Reflections: A Green Eye on Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer.

Current standards of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer remains the 5th most common cancer and the 3rd most common cause of cancer mortality. Most patients diagnosed with gastric cancer still have a poor prognosis due to its advanced presentation at diagnosis, even in countries with developed screening programs. Surgery is the cornerstone of the treatment for gastric cancer, often combined with perioperative chemotherapy. Lymph node dissection is a crucial component of the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. D1 lymphadenectomy is currently recommended for early stage tumors. The extent of lymphadenectomy in advanced gastric cancer, however, is still a matter of debate between Eastern and Western surgeons. Although a D2 dissection is the current standard recommended by most guidelines, there might be a place for more limited dissections such as D1 + in selected cases. This evidence-based review will help defining the optimal lymphadenectomy for patients with gastric cancer.

Prognostic impact of fluorescent lymphography on gastric cancer.

Fluorescent lymphography-guided lymphadenectomy (FL) for gastric cancer is gaining popularity. However, its impact on prognosis is not known. This study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of FL in gastric cancer patients. This study retrospectively analyzed 5678 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy from 2013 to 2017. The survival was compared between the FLFL group and the conventional lymphadenectomy (non-FL group) using 1:1 propensity score matching after exclusion. Patients in the FL group underwent gastrectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy after endoscopic peritumoral injection of indocyanine green the day before surgery. After propensity score matching, the FL and non-FL groups each had 1064 patients with similar demographic and clinicopathological characteristics. All matched variables had a standardized mean difference under 0.1. The FL group showed a significantly higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (56.2±20.1) than the non-FL group (46.2±18.2, P <0.001). The FL group also had more stage III patients ( P= 0.044) than the non-FL group. The FL group demonstrated higher overall survival ( P= 0.038) and relapse-free survival ( P= 0.036) in stage III compared with the non-FL group. However, no significant differences in overall and relapse-free survival were observed between the two groups for stages I ( P= 0.420 and P= 0.120, respectively) and II ( P= 0.200 and P= 0.280, respectively). FL demonstrated a higher survival in stage III gastric cancer patients by the more accurate staging resulting from larger lymph node retrieval. Thus, given its potential to improve prognostication by enhancing staging accuracy, it is recommended as an option to consider the use of FL in clinical practice.

Retrospective cohort study of laparoscopic ICG-Guided Lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer from a Western country center.

Indocyanine green (ICG) guided lymphadenectomy has been proposed has a technique to improve the lymphadenectomy of patients with gastric cancer. Nevertheless, experience with this procedure is scarce in Western countries. A retrospective analytic study in a tertiary hospital in Spain was performed, comparing patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy with (ICG cohort) and without (historic cohort) ICG guided lymphadenectomy. Thirty four patients were included (17 in each group). Although the number of positive nodes was similar in both groups (0.0 in the ICG cohort vs. 2 in the historic cohort, p = 0.119), the number of lymph nodes removed was higher in the ICG cohort (42.0 vs 28.0, p = 0.040). In the ICG cohort, more lymph nodes were positive for adenocarcinoma in the group of nodes that were positive for IGC (10.6% of the IGC + nodes vs. 1.9% in the ICG-nodes, p < 0.001). ICG lymphadenectomy is a promising procedure that could improve the lymphadenectomy of patients with gastric cancer. ICG lymphadenectomy could be used to increase the number of lymph nodes removed in patients with a high-risk of nodal invasion or it could be used to reduce the surgical aggressiveness in fragile patients with a low-risk of nodal invasion.

Application value and difficulty analysis of fluorescence laparoscopy in lymphadenectomy of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common gastrointestinal malignancies, and the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer remain high in China. In recent years, with the rapid popularization of laparoscopic technology, fluorescent laparoscopic technology is increasingly getting mature, providing a new method for accurate clinical tracing of lymph nodes and prediction of tumor metastasis lymph nodes. A large number of scientific research experiments and clinical trials have shown that, laparoscopic lymph node diagnosis technology based on the fluorescent indocyanine green (ICG) can significantly improve the efficiency of lymphadenectomy and prediction accuracy of lymph node metastasis, and can reveal a more accurate scope of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer for surgeons, so as to avoid excessive adenectomy as well as iatrogenic injuries on patients. Although the status of the technology in gastric cancer surgery mentioned above continues improving, the overall operation process details of ICG fluorescence imaging, standardized fluorescence detecting equipment, and postoperative pathological examination process still need to be further optimized.

Individualised splenic hilum lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer: ICG-guided mapping

Individualised splenic hilum lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer: ICG-guided mapping

Laparoscopic infrapyloric lymph nodes dissection through the right bursa omentalis approach for gastric cancer

BackgroundA complete dissection of infrapyloric lymph nodes is the key to a curative gastrectomy, which can be sometimes technically challenging in laparoscopic surgery.MethodsOne hundred and eighteen patients with gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in which the infrapyloric lymph nodes were dissected through the right bursa omentalis approach were included. The clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsThe laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy was successful in all 118 patients with no open conversion. The mean operation time was 246.6 ± 45.7 min. The mean estimated blood loss was 87.0 ± 35.9 mL. Postoperative complications occurred in 17.8% of the patients, which were treated successfully with conservative therapy or aspiration in all. There were no No.6 lymphadenectomy-associated complications, such as injury of transverse colon, vessels of mesocolon, pancreas or duodenum, no pancreatitis, pancreatic leakage or postoperative hemorrhage. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 9.6 ± 3.7 days. On average, the total lymph nodes harvested were 36.8 ± 12.9, in which the ones from the infrapyloric area were 5.1 ± 3.1.ConclusionLaparoscopic dissection of infrapyloric lymph nodes through the right bursa omentalis approach seems to be feasible and safe, facilitating a more complete No.6 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.

Individualización de la linfadenectomía del hilio esplénico en el cáncer gástrico: valor del mapeo por ICG

Individualización de la linfadenectomía del hilio esplénico en el cáncer gástrico: valor del mapeo por ICG

Development and validation of a novel staging system integrating the number and location of lymph nodes for gastric adenocarcinoma

BackgroundEvidence suggests that the anatomic extent of metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) affects prognosis, as proposed by alternative staging systems. The aim of this study was to establish a new staging system based on the number of perigastric (PMLN) and extra-perigastric (EMLN) MLNs.MethodsData from a Chinese cohort of 1090 patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy with D2 or D2 plus lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer were retrospectively analysed. A Japanese validation cohort (n = 826) was included. Based on the Cox proportional hazards model, the regression coefficients of PMLN and EMLN were used to calculate modified MLN (MMLN). Prognostic performance of the staging systems was evaluated.ResultsPMLN and EMLN were independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis (coefficients: 0.044, 0.115; all P < 0.001). MMLN was calculated as follows: MMLN = PMLN + 2.6 × EMLN. The MMLN staging system showed superior prognostic performance (C-index: 0.751 in the Chinese cohort; 0.748 in the Japanese cohort) compared with the five published LN staging systems when MMLN numbers were grouped as follows: MMLN0 (0), MMLN1 (1–4), MMLN2 (5–8), MMLN3 (9–20), and MMLN4 (>20).DiscussionThe MMLN staging system is suitable for assessing overall survival among patients undergoing curative gastrectomy with D2 or D2 plus lymphadenectomy.

D2 Lymphadenectomy as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Gastric Cancer

Abstract Background: The last decades have been marked by debates based on the importance of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer, lymphadenectomy being a topic of controversy between the Western Surgical Societies and the Asian side. Lymphadenectomy is currently a globally accepted standard in the treatment of gastric cancer. Methods: The present study was performed prospectively on a number of 93 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer, who underwent radical gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in the Surgery Department of the Emergency County Clinical Hospital, Constanta, between January 2012 - December 2016. In 70 cases, an extended D2 or standard D2 lymphadenectomy was performed, and for 23 patients: D1 + lymphadenectomy. The data were statistically analyzed in order to determine the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer. Results: The average age was 65.88 ± 8.80 years. The mean number of lymph nodes harvested in D2 lymphadenectomy was 22.8 ± 7.60, with limits between 15 and 43, and the number of positive lymph nodes ranged from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 37. Histopathological exam of specimens showed that only 17.2% of patients with gastric cancers were without lymph node metastases (pN0), while 45.16% were in the pN3 stage. Analysis of survival curves revealed that 5-year survival was significantly higher in D2 lymphadenectomy compared to D1 + lymphadenectomy (23.8% vs. 8.7%). Conclusions: The current study validates D2 lymphadenectomy as a standard technique and the superiority of the prognosis in gastric cancer patients through results obtained in terms of 5-year survival.

Lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer at European specialist centres

Background and aimsThe aim of this project was to evaluate the current practice of D2 in Europe. Materials and methodsIn the first part of the study, 18 European high volume gastric cancer centres completed a questionnaire, designed to evaluate their preferred lymphadenectomy in a series of clinical scenarios. Surgeon compliance with international guidelines for lymphadenectomy was evaluated.In the second part, information on 381 gastrectomies performed for primary gastric cancer by participating surgeons from January to December 2015, was retrospectively collected. ResultsSurgical choice in clinical scenarios was affected by tumour stage and to a lesser extent, site and histotype. In particular, in early gastric cancer with diffuse histology D2 was recommended by >70% of surgeons, while this percentage dropped to 44% in intestinal histotypes. When surgeons selected a D2 dissection, the procedure was rarely fully compliant with the Japanese guidelines.In the review of gastrectomy experience an adequate number of nodes (≥15 nodes) was retrieved in 97% after D2. The number of retrieved nodes varied with median values ranging from 17 to 35 (p < 0.001) after D2. D2/D2+ was more frequently performed in mixed (80%) and diffuse (78%) cases than in intestinal cases (69%) (p = 0.016). ConclusionsAlthough an adequate lymphadenectomy was achieved in almost all cases in dedicated centres, there is still variation in the number of retrieved nodes. Tumor histology largely affects surgeon’s choice as regards the extent of lymphadenectomy; however, the role of histology in planning surgical procedures needs to be verified in prospective trials.

A study of outcomes, technical safety, and feasibility of D-2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.

Background and AimLymph node dissection in gastric cancer had been controversial, but recent data have led us to the conclusion that D‐2 dissection should be the standard of care for potentially curable advanced gastric carcinoma. In this study, we present our single‐institution experience of D‐2 lymph node dissection.MethodsFrom January 2013 to September 2018, 115 patients of gastric cancer were treated with D‐2 gastrectomy, 91 of whom met the criteria for study analysis. Data were statistically described as frequencies and percentages where appropriate. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox regression was used to assess the risk among groups. A P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant at 95% confidence interval.ResultsThe majority of patients (86.8%) had Clavien‐Dindo grade I postoperative surgical complications; 90‐day mortality was seen in five (5.5%) patients. Patients with stages I, II, and III had survival rates of 100%, 71.4%; 53.2%, 44.4%; and 27.8%, 28.1%, respectively, for ages <55 and >55 years. Overall recurrence free survival rates were 26 and 28% for <55 years and >55 years, respectively, with a P value of 0.570. On multivariate analysis, positive distal margin and multivisceral resection had a statistically significant hazard ratio.ConclusionsThis retrospective study conducted in our institute on patients with gastric cancer undergoing D‐2 lymphadenectomy has shown that the addition of D‐2 lymph node dissection, when performed at high‐volume centers, have acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. This can be seen from our grades of postoperative surgical complications, 90‐day mortality, and overall 5‐year survival.

The Impact of Severe Infectious Complications on Long-term Prognosis for Gastric Cancer.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of postoperative infectious complications on long-term outcomes after curative resection of gastric cancer. Patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer at Yokohama City University and Kanagawa Cancer Center from January 2000 to August 2015 were retrospectively selected from medical records. Clinicopathological factors between patients with and without infectious complications were compared. Prognostic factors of long-term survival were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses. A total of 2,254 patients were eligible for inclusion in the present study. Fifty-eight patients had postoperative infectious complications (IC group); 2,196 had no postoperative infectious complications (NC group). In the IC group, the median age (p=0.031), body mass index (p=0.004), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (p=0.006) and percentage of male patients (p<0.001) were higher in comparison to the NC group. The operation time was longer (p<0.001) and the incidence of intestinal-type histology was higher (p=0.017) in the IC group. The 5-year overall survival rates of the IC and NC groups were 59.8% and 83.2%, respectively (p<0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that postoperative infectious complications were a significant risk factor for poorer overall survival (hazard ratio=2.38; 95% confidence interval=1.47-3.85, p<0.001). Perioperative management is necessary to reduce the incidence of postoperative infectious complications and improve the survival of patients after curative resection of gastric cancer.

Fluorescence-guided lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer: a prospective western series.

Indocyanine green (ICG) has been recently introduced in clinical practice as a fluorescent tracer. Lymphadenectomy is particularly challenging in gastric cancer surgery, owing to the complex anatomical drainage. The primary outcomes of this study were the feasibility and usefulness of ICG-guided lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer surgery, considering both the success rate and improved understanding of the surgical anatomy of nodal basins. The secondary outcome was the diagnostic ability of ICG to predict the presence of nodal metastases. We conducted a single-center prospective trial comprising 13 patients with gastric cancer. ICG was injected the afternoon prior to surgery or intraoperatively via the submucosal or subserosal route. Standard lymphadenectomy was performed in all patients, according to patient age and tumor stage, as usual, but after standard lymphadenectomy the residual ICG + nodes were harvested and analyzed. Each nodal station and each dissected node was recorded and classified as ICG + or ICG- (both in vivo and back table evaluation was utilized for classification). After pathological analysis, each nodal station and each dissected node was recorded as metastatic or nonmetastatic (E&E staining). The feasibility rate was 84.6% (11/13). The mean number of dissected lymph nodes per patient was 37.9. Focusing on the 11 patients in whom ICG-guided nodal navigation was successfully performed, 81 lymph node stations were removed, for a total of 417 lymph nodes. Sixty-six stations (81.48%), comprising a total of 336 lymph nodes, exhibited fluorescence. No IC- node was metastatic; all 54 metastatic nodes were ICG + . A total of 282 ICG + nodes were nonmetastatic. In two cases, some nodes outside D2 areas were harvested, being ICG + (1 case of metastatic node). Fluorescence lymphography-guided lymphadenectomy is a promising new technique that combines a high feasibility rate with considerable ease of use. Regarding its diagnostic value, the key finding from this prospective series is that no metastatic nodes were found outside fluorescent lymph node stations. Further studies are needed to investigate whether this technique can help surgeons performing standard lymphadenectomy and selecting cases for D2 + lymphadenectomy.

Significance of nodal dissection and nodal positivity in gastric cancer.

Lymphadenectomy is a central component of surgery for gastric cancer. However, controversies over the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer surgery have persisted for several decades. In Eastern countries where the incidence of gastric cancer is high, surgeons have performed extensive lymphadenectomy (D2 lymphadenectomy) with low morbidity and mortality, while most Western surgeons have advocated for more limited lymphadenectomies according to the results of Dutch trial and MRC trial. Initially, these trials had failed to show survival benefit of D2 procedure and instead, found pancreaticosplenectomy performed as part of the D2 procedure associated with high incidence of morbidity and mortality. Subsequently, superiority of D2 lymphadenectomy on survival was demonstrated based on updated results. Moreover, spleen and pancreas preserving D2 lymphadenectomy are being performed safely in Western countries. Today, there is an international consensus on performing D2 lymphadenectomy as the standard procedure for advanced gastric cancer and is widely accepted as the standard procedure for gastric cancer surgery. The significance of the extent of lymphadenectomy is intimately associated with the prognostic importance of nodal metastases as the most powerful indicator of recurrence and survival for patients after curative gastrectomy. Maruyama computer program could be used to estimate the risk of lymph node metastasis in each nodal station. The Maruyama Index could be used to assess the adequacy of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer. Positive lymph node ratio is calculated as the ratio of positive lymph nodes to all harvested lymph nodes, which might be a more precise predictor of prognosis than the absolute number of positive lymph nodes. While D2 lymphadenectomy enables the accurate staging of the disease, reduces the incidence of locoregional recurrences and thus contribute to an improved overall survival; performing lymphadenectomy beyond D2 is unlikely to improve survival. Therapeutic D2+ lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer requires further evaluations, especially for patients receiving neo-adjuvant or conversion treatments.

Fluorescence image-guided lymphadenectomy using indocyanine green and near infrared technology during robotic gastrectomy: a prospective pilot study: IG-MIG Study

Background: Gastric cancer is a worldwide challenge due to its spread, even epidemic in some areas, and the high mortality rates. Lymphadenectomy is considered the fundamental step during radical gastrectomy. In recent years, some researchers have tried to find a way to improve the surgical identifi cation of the lymphatic drainage routes and lymph node stations. This new surgical frontier is the so called “navigation surgery”. Among the diff erent reported solutions, lately, the indocyanine green (ICG) has drawn attention. It is a fluorescence dye, that can be detected in the near infrared spectral band (NIR). The development of specific fluorescence imaging devices has allowed surgeons to visualize tumors, vascular and lymphatic structures. The Da Vinci Xi robotic system has an integrated imaging technology that has been used in colo-rectal and hepatobiliary surgery. However, up to date, the combined use of fluorescence imaging and robotic technology has not been evaluated during lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer. Methods: General design: to evaluate the role of fluorescence imaging during robotic lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Type of study: interventional prospective pilot study. Duration: 18 months. Experimental group: patients undergoing dissection assisted by ICG. Control group: patients undergoing the same surgery without the injection of ICG. Primary outcomes: Fluorescent lymph nodes (FLNs) identification rate, accuracy of the procedure, comparison with the control group on the total number of lymph nodes retrieved. Sample size: 20 patients in the experimental group, 20 patients in the control group. Ethics: This study is conducted in compliance with ethical principles originating from the Helsinki Declaration, within the guidelines of Good Clinical Practice and relevant laws/regulations. Trial registration number: NCT03931044

Evaluation of D2-plus radical resection for gastric cancer with pyloric invasion

BackgroundThe optimal lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer (GC) with pyloric invasion is controversial because the pattern of lymph node metastasis is different from that of distal GC. The rate of lymph node metastasis into the posterior area of the pancreatic head and hepatoduodenal ligament is high. This study evaluated the estimated benefit of radical gastrectomy with D2-plus lymphadenectomy in patients with pyloric invasion.MethodsAll patients with GC invading the pylorus who underwent curative surgical resection with D2-plus lymphadenectomy between February 2013 and September 2015 were enrolled in the study. The index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection (IEBLD) was calculated by multiplying the incidence of metastasis to each lymph node station by the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients with metastasis to that station.ResultsIn total, 128 patients were eligible. The rate of lymph node metastasis and the 3-year OS rate (and IEBLD) of the patients with metastasis to lymph nodes were 14.3 and 44.4% (5.56) for No. 8p, 10.9 and 35.7% (3.89) for No. 12b, 9.5 and 33.3% (3.13) for No. 12p, 18.8 and 54.2% (10.19) for No. 13, and 21.8 and 53.6% (11.68) for No. 14v, respectively.ConclusionsIn radical gastrectomy for GC with pyloric invasion, some survival benefit was observed with dissection of the No. 13 and No. 14 lymph nodes, but there was no survival benefit with dissection of the No. 8p lymph nodes. The No. 12b and No. 12p lymph nodes may be better to dissect in cT3 GC patients with pyloric invasion.Trial registrationhttp://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01836991. Date of registration: April 17, 2013.

TOTAL OMENTECTOMY IN GASTRIC CANCER SURGERY: IS IT ALWAYS NECESSARY?

ABSTRACTBackground: Traditionally, total omentectomy is performed along with gastric resection and extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer (GC) surgery. However, solid evidences regarding its oncologic benefit is still scarce. Aim: To evaluate the incidence of metastatic omental lymph nodes (LN) in patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for GC, as well as its risk factors and patients’ outcomes. Methods: All consecutive patients submitted to D2/modified D2 gastrectomy due to gastric adenocarcinoma from March 2009 to April 2016 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective collected database. Results: Of 284 patients included, five (1.8%) patients had metastatic omental LN (one: pT3N3bM0; two: pT4aN3bM0; one: pT4aN2M0 and one pT4bN3bM0). Four of them deceased and one was under palliative chemotherapy due relapse. LN metastases in the greater omentum significantly correlated with tumor’s size (p=0.018), N stage (p<0.001), clinical stage (p=0.022), venous invasion growth (p=0.003), recurrence (p=0.006), site of recurrence (peritoneum: p=0.008; liver: p=0.023; ovary: p=0.035) and death (p=0.008). Conclusion:The incidence of metastatic omental LN of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy due to GC is extremely low. Total omentectomy may be avoided in tumors smaller than 5.25 cm and T1/T2 tumors. However, the presence of lymph node metastases in the greater omentum is associated with recurrence in the peritoneum, liver, ovary and death.

Impact of intra-peritoneal fat distribution on intra-operative bleeding volume with D2 lymphadenectomy in Chinese patients with gastric cancer

To explore the quantitative measurements and evaluation of intra-peritoneal fat distribution by MDCT and its significance in predicting intra-operative bleeding volume during D2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer (GC) patients. From June 2016 to September 2017, GC patients scheduled for open gastrectomy with D2 lymph-node dissection were enrolled. According to the BMI, the subjects were then classified as normal BMI(BMI<25kg/m2); overweight (BMI=25-30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI≥30kg/m2). According to the intraoperative blood loss (IBL), the patients were further separated into high IBL (IBL; ≥ 300ml) or low IBL (<300ml). Clinicopathological parameters between the groups were statistically compared and univariate and multivariate analysis were used to identify predictive factors such as intra-peritoneal fat areas (IFA) and intra-peritoneal fat areas ratio (IFAR) for high IBL. A total of 226 patients were included in the study where 53 patients underwent distal while 173 underwent total gastrectomy. According to the BMI classification, there were 25 normal BMI, 108 overweight and 25 obese subjects. According to the IBL, there were 98 high IBL and 128 low IBL subjects. IFA and IFAR were significantly greater in the high IBL group than in the low IBL group. There was no significant difference in any other clinicopathological factors between the high IBL group and the low IBL group. Multivariate analysis revealed that high IFA and IFAR independently predicted high IBL. The use of MDCT to evaluate the precise distribution of abdominal fat during preoperative examination can prompt surgeons to develop techniques to decrease intraoperative bleeding in obese patients. Nevertheless, it is yet necessary to be surgically more meticulous when dealing with patients with high IFA or high IFA/IFAR in order to improve the outcome of D2 gastrectomy.