Lymph Node Biopsy In Patients Research Articles

Indocyanine green and methylene blue dye guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with penile cancer (PeCa): results of 50 inguinal basins assessed at a single institution in India.

The primary aim of this study was to validate the reliability, sensitivity and safety profile of novel combination of ICG- methylene blue dye as an SN tracer for PeCa. This is a validation and non-randomised prospective observational study involving 25 patients (50 inguinal basins) who underwent SLNB where in ICG and methylene blue were used for localisation. The patients with clinically node negative groins were recruited in the study. SNs were identified intraoperatively using near infrared fluorescence imaging (NIRF Imaging system, SPY-PHI, Stryker, Sweden) and blue dye. The numbers of SNs identified by each tracer and the rates of complications and nodal recurrence during the followup. Overall 137 SNs were identified intraoperatively. Among the 137 SNs excised fluorescence, blue dye and Combined (blue + green) identified 57(41.6%), 27 (19.7%), and 51 (37.2%), respectively. The average number of SLNs removed per patient was 5 (range, 1-11) with sentinel lymph nodes detection rate at 94% (47/50). Seven patients had malignancy on SLNB and underwent ipsilateral radical inguinal lymphadenectomy. One patient had false negative SN and positive node in modified inguinal lymphadenectomy specimen. No adverse events were observed in all cases. The Novel combination of ICG fluorescence-Methylene blue dye technique is simple, reliable and safe. Moreover, it demonstrates a high SLN detection rate with a low false-negative rate, and it avoids radiation exposure.

Omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with clinically axillary lymph node-negative early breast cancer (OMSLNB): protocol for a prospective, non-inferiority, single-arm, phase II clinical trial in China

IntroductionSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard procedure for patients with clinically assessed negative axillary lymph nodes (cN0) during early-stage breast cancer (EBC). However, the majority of EBC patients...

SP6.2 - Oncological outcomes following sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with node positive breast cancer at diagnosis who achieve an axillary pathological complete response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy

Abstract De-escalation of axillary surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for patients with node positive breast cancer at diagnosis have focused on ensuring a low false negative rate for those who undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) only with limited data to date on oncological outcomes. This study aimed to assess the medium-term oncological outcome in patients who have an axillary pCR following NACT and undergo de-escalation of axillary surgery with only a SLN performed post NACT. A consecutive series of patients with cytologically proven node-positive breast cancer who received NACT and achieved a nodal pCR on SLN between 2013-2021 were retrospectively analysed. Eligible patients underwent an end of treatment axillary ultrasound and if axillary nodes appeared sonographically normal a sentinel node biopsy was performed, with dual modality mapping (radioisotope and blue dye) at the time of breast surgery. The primary outcome of interest was disease free recurrence (DFS), and the secondary outcome was isolated axillary recurrence. 79 patients (median age 48 years) received NACT and had cytologically proven node-positive disease at diagnosis and attained an axillary pathological complete response (pCR) post NACT. The median nodal yield at SLN was 4 (range 1-9). Median follow up was 4.4 years. Only 1 patient experienced an axillary recurrence. Triple negative subtype had the lowest overall DFS. In this cohort, axillary recurrence remains uncommon. The optimal surgical strategy for safe de-escalation of axillary surgery post NACT remains in focus with adjuncts such as nodal marking and targeted axillary currently under study.

Survival Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

To assess whether there were statistically significant differences in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between pelvic lymphadenectomy (PL) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone as a nodal assessment method in patients with early-stage cervical cancer (IA1 with ILV to IB2 or IIA1 of the FIGO 2018 classification). A retrospective study was conducted among patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent radical surgery with pelvic lymph node assessment at La Paz University Hospital between 2005 and 2022. For nodal staging, either PL, SLNB + PL, or exclusive SLNB were performed, depending on the time period. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared between the PL and SLNB groups. Predictors of bilateral sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection were identified with Cox proportional hazard models. Among the 128 patients included, PL ± SLNB was performed in 79 (61.7%) patients and exclusive SLNB in 49 (38.3%) patients. There was no difference between PL and SLNB in OS (log-rank 0.0730) or PFS (log-rank 0.0189). Lower limb lymphedema (LLL) was significantly lower in the SLNB group (p = 0.001). Pelvic nodal assessment with SLNB alone did not worsen survival rates compared with the standard PL in patients with early-stage cervical cancer, and it is associated with a lower rate of LLL.

De-Escalating the Extent of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Undergoing Mastectomy

BackgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for axillary staging in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergoing mastectomy is debated due to low nodal positivity rate and risk of morbidity. Standard SLNB entails removing all lymph nodes (LN) that have a radioactive count > 10% of the most radioactive node, contain blue dye or are palpably suspicious. In this study, we hypothesize that judicious SLNB with attempt to remove only the node with the highest radioactive count provides sufficient pathologic information while minimizing morbidity. MethodA single institution prospective database was retrospectively reviewed to identify women with DCIS who underwent mastectomy and SLNB between 2010 and 2022. Patient characteristics, number of SLNs retrieved, pathologic results and long-term upper extremity complications were analyzed. ResultsA total of 743 LNs were removed in 324 pts. Median (IQR) age was 62 (51-70) years. Dual tracer technique, with technetium-99m labeled radiocolloid and blue dye, was used in 311 (96%) pts, whereas single agent (radioisotope or blue dye alone) was utilized in 9 (2.8%) and 4 (1.2%) patients, respectively. Median (IQR) number of SLN removed was 2 (1-3) (range 1-9). In 99% of cases, the SLN with the highest radioactive count was identified among the first 3 dissected LNs. Final pathology revealed upstaging to invasive cancer in 27.5% (n = 89) of the breasts and nodal positivity in 1.9% (n = 6) of the patients. In all 6 cases, metastatic disease was identified in the LN with highest radioactive count among the LNs retrieved. No additional metastatic nodes were identified after > 3 SLN had been removed. At median follow-up of 57 (range 28-87) months, 8.3% (n = 27) of pts complained of long-term upper extremity symptoms. 7.1% (23 pts) were referred to physical therapy for symptoms such as swelling, fullness, heaviness, stiffness, or sensory discomfort in the upper extremity and/or axillary cording. Long-term upper extremity complications were higher when > 3 SLNs compared to ≤ 3 SLNs were removed (10.4% vs. 6.5%, P = .005). ConclusionIn this cohort of patients with DCIS undergoing mastectomy who were upstaged on final pathology to node positive invasive cancers, the SLN with the highest radioactive count provided sufficient information for axillary staging. Acknowledging that the “hottest” LN is not always the first 1 removed, these data support an increased likelihood of developing long-term complications when more than 3 SLNs are removed. Rather than comprehensive removal of all SLNs meeting the standard “10% rule,” prioritizing the sequence of removal to the highest count provides the same prognostic information with reduced morbidity.

Combined Fluorescein and Methylene Blue Dye for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients of Early Carcinoma Breast: A Promising Technique

Combined Fluorescein and Methylene Blue Dye for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients of Early Carcinoma Breast: A Promising Technique

The Use of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy for DCIS

BackgroundCurrent guidelines do not recommend routine sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), except in the setting of mastectomy or microinvasive disease. This study aimed to evaluate national SLNB utilization in women undergoing upfront mastectomy for DCIS, identify predictors of SLNB utilization, and determine the percentage with a positive SLNB. MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the NCDB of women with clinical DCIS who underwent upfront mastectomy between 2012 and 2017. Demographic and clinicopathologic variables were compared between patients who underwent SLNB and those who did not. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with SLNB utilization and positive SLNB. ResultsAbout 38,973 patients met inclusion criteria: 34,231 (88%) underwent SLNB and 4742 (12%) had no surgical axillary staging. Most patients were age 50-69 (51%), non-Hispanic White (71%), with private insurance (66%). On multivariate analysis, older patients were less likely to receive SLNB (P < .01), while patients with higher grade DCIS were more likely to undergo SLNB (P < .01). In those who underwent SLNB (n = 34,231), only 1,149 (3.4%) had nodal involvement. Non-Hispanic Black patients had increased odds of a positive SLNB (P < .01), while those with estrogen receptor positive disease were less likely to be node positive (OR 0.68, P < .001). ConclusionsWhile 88% of patients had a SLNB, only 3.4% were found to be node positive. Given this low rate, it is reasonable to consider SLNB omission in select patients with low grade, hormone receptor positive DCIS undergoing upfront mastectomy.

Nomogram for predicting pathology upstaging in patients with EIN: is sentinel lymph node assessment useful in these patients?

The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors for postoperative pathological escalation of endometrial cancer in patients with a pathologic diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) before surgery. Some of the clues from the preoperative assessment were used to build a nomogram to predict the likely pathological escalation after surgery, and to explore the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in these patients with possible pathological escalation. This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent surgical treatment for EIN diagnosed before surgery between 2018 and 2023 in The Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. parameters including clinical, radiological and histopathological factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression to determine the correlation with pathology upstaging. A nomogram based on the multivariate results was developed to predict the probability of pathology upstaging. A total of 729 patients were included, divided into training set and validation set. 484 patients were used to build the model. This nomogram was subsequently validated using 245 patients. Upstaging to endometrial carcinoma occurred in 115 (23.8 percent) of 484 women treated between 2018 and 2023 in training set. A lager endometrial thickness (at least 15 mm), menopause, hypertension, HE4, and endometrial blood were significantly associated with upstaging. A nomogram developed using these factors demonstrated good predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)=0.6808; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.6246-0.7369). The nomogram showed similar predictive performance in the validation data set, based on another 245 women (AUC=0.7821; 95% CI=0.7076-0.8567). This study developed a novel nomogram based on the 5 most important factors, which can accurately predict invasive cancer. It is common for women with preoperative diagnosis of EIN to experience pathological progression to endometrial cancer. For some patients with postoperative pathological escalation, we found lymph node metastasis. This nomogram may be useful to help doctor decide whether to perform sentinel lymph node biopsy for surgical staging in these EIN patients. According to the nomogram, simultaneous sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with high probability of postoperative pathological upgrading can provide better guidance for postoperative adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer and avoid the occurrence of secondary surgery.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer ycT4N0M0 after neoadjuvant drug therapy

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an effective clarifying diagnostic method that is actively used in various malignancies, including breast cancer. The effectiveness of this method has led to a potential expansion of the standard indications for its use. This article is devoted to the study of the effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy based on world literature data regarding the use of ycT4N0M0 in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant drug therapy.

Abstract PO3-12-09: De-Escalating Extent of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Undergoing Mastectomy

Abstract Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLNB) biopsy for axillary staging in patients (pts) with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergoing mastectomy is debated due to low positivity rate and potential morbidity. Standard SLNB entails removing all LNs with a radioactive count &amp;gt;10% of the most radioactive node, contain blue dye or are palpably suspicious. In this study, we hypothesize that judicious SLNB with attempt to remove only the SLN with the highest radioactive count provides sufficient pathologic information while minimizing morbidity. Method: A single institution prospective database was retrospectively reviewed to identify women with core biopsy showing DCIS (cTis) who underwent mastectomy and SLNB between 2010–22. Pt characteristics, number of SLNs retrieved, pathologic results and long-term upper extremity complications were collected. Results: A total of 743 LN's were removed in 324 pts. Median [IQR] age was 62 [51–70] years. Dual tracer technique, with Technetium-99m labeled radiocolloid and blue dye, was used in 311 (96%) pts, whereas single agent (radioisotope or blue dye alone) was utilized in 9 (2.8%) and 4 (1.2%) pts respectively. Median [IQR] number of SLN removed was 2 [1-3] (range 1-9). In 99% of cases, the SLN with the highest radioactive count was identified among the first 3 dissected LNs. Final pathology revealed upstaging to invasive cancer in 27.5% (n=89) of the breasts and nodal positivity in 1.9% (n=6) of the patients. In all 6 cases, metastatic disease was identified in the LN with highest radioactive count among the LNs retrieved. No additional metastatic nodes were identified after &amp;gt;3 SLN had been removed. At median follow-up of 57 (range 28-87) months, 8.3% (n=27) of pts complained of long-term upper extremity symptoms. 7.1% (23 pts) were referred to physical therapy for symptoms such as swelling, fullness, heaviness, stiffness or sensory discomfort in the upper extremity and/or axillary cording. Long-term upper extremity complications were higher when &amp;gt;3 SLNs compared to &amp;lt;3 SLNs were removed (10.4% vs 6.5%, p=0.005). Conclusion: In this cohort of pts with DCIS (cTis) undergoing mastectomy who had upstaging on final pathology to invasive cancer with LN involvement, the SLN with the highest radioactive count provided sufficient information for axillary staging. Acknowledging that the “hottest” LN is not always the first one removed, these data support an increased likelihood of developing long-term complications when more than three SLNs are removed. Rather than comprehensive removal of all SLNs meeting the standard “10% rule,” prioritizing the sequence of removal to the highest count provides the same prognostic information with reduced morbidity. Patient and lymph node characteristics Citation Format: Adil Ayub, Kazim Senol, Makris Eleftherios, Michael Cowher, Ronald Johnson, Kristin Lupinacci, Qurat Ul Ain Sabih, Jennifer Steiman, Emilia Diego, Priscilla McAuliffe, Atilla Soran. De-Escalating Extent of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Undergoing Mastectomy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-12-09.

Abstract PS01-01: Feasibility and oncological safety of targeted axillary dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with clinically node-positive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the prospective MF-1803 NEOSENTITURK-study

Abstract PS01-01: Feasibility and oncological safety of targeted axillary dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with clinically node-positive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the prospective MF-1803 NEOSENTITURK-study

What is the role for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients over 70 with T1 early breast cancer?

What is the role for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients over 70 with T1 early breast cancer?

A study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial investigating videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile cancer (VELRAD).

Penile cancer is a rare male genital malignancy. Surgical excision of the primary tumour is followed by radical inguinal lymphadenectomy if there is metastatic disease detected by biopsy, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or following sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with impalpable disease. However, radical inguinal lymphadenectomy is associated with a high morbidity rate, and there is increasing usage of a videoendoscopic approach as an alternative. A pragmatic, UK-wide multicentre feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), comparing videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy. Patients will be identified and recruited from supraregional multi-disciplinary team meetings (sMDT) and must be aged 18 or over requiring inguinal lymphadenectomy, with no contraindications to surgical intervention for their cancer. Participants will be followed up for 6 months following randomisation. The primary outcome is the ability to recruit patients for randomisation across all selected sites and the rate of loss to follow-up. Other outcomes include acceptability of the trial and intervention to patients and healthcare professionals assessed by qualitative research and obtaining resource utilisation information for health economic analysis. There are currently no other published RCTs comparing videoendoscopic versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy. Ongoing study is required to determine whether randomising patients to either procedure is feasible and acceptable to patients. The results of this study may determine the design of a subsequent trial. Clinicaltrials.gov PRS registry, registration number NCT05592639. Date of registration: 13th October 2022, retrospectively registered.

Development and validation of a novel model to predict recurrence-free survival and melanoma-specific survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma: an international, retrospective, multicentre analysis

The introduction of adjuvant systemic treatment for patients with high-risk melanomas necessitates accurate staging of disease. However, inconsistencies in outcomes exist between disease stages as defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (8th edition). We aimed to develop a tool to predict patient-specific outcomes in people with melanoma rather than grouping patients according to disease stage. Patients older than 13 years with confirmed primary melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between Oct 29, 1997, and Nov 11, 2013, at four European melanoma centres (based in Berlin, Germany; Amsterdam and Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and Warsaw, Poland) were included in the development cohort. Potential predictors of recurrence-free and melanoma-specific survival assessed were sex, age, presence of ulceration, primary tumour location, histological subtype, Breslow thickness, sentinel node status, number of sentinel nodes removed, maximum diameter of the largest sentinel node metastasis, and Dewar classification. A prognostic model and nomogram were developed to predict 5-year recurrence-free survival on a continuous scale in patients with stage pT1b or higher melanomas. This model was also calibrated to predict melanoma-specific survival. Model performance was assessed by discrimination (area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC]) and calibration. External validation was done in a cohort of patients with primary melanomas who underwent SLNB between Jan 30, 1997, and Dec 12, 2013, at the Melanoma Institute Australia (Sydney, NSW, Australia). The development cohort consisted of 4071 patients, of whom 2075 (51%) were female and 1996 (49%) were male. 889 (22%) had sentinel node-positive disease and 3182 (78%) had sentinel node-negative disease. The validation cohort comprised 4822 patients, of whom 1965 (41%) were female and 2857 (59%) were male. 891 (18%) had sentinel node-positive disease and 3931 (82%) had sentinel node-negative disease. Median follow-up was 4·8 years (IQR 2·3-7·8) in the development cohort and 5·0 years (2·2-8·9) in the validation cohort. In the development cohort, 5-year recurrence-free survival was 73·5% (95% CI 72·0-75·1) and 5-year melanoma-specific survival was 86·5% (85·3-87·8). In the validation cohort, the corresponding estimates were 66·1% (64·6-67·7) and 83·3% (82·0-84·6), respectively. The final model contained six prognostic factors: sentinel node status, Breslow thickness, presence of ulceration, age at SLNB, primary tumour location, and maximum diameter of the largest sentinel node metastasis. In the development cohort, for the model's prediction of recurrence-free survival, the AUC was 0·80 (95% CI 0·78-0·81); for prediction of melanoma-specific survival, the AUC was 0·81 (0·79-0·84). External validation showed good calibration for both outcomes, with AUCs of 0·73 (0·71-0·75) and 0·76 (0·74-0·78), respectively. Our prediction model and nomogram accurately predicted patient-specific risk probabilities for 5-year recurrence-free and melanoma-specific survival. These tools could have important implications for clinical decision making when considering adjuvant treatments in patients with high-risk melanomas. Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute.

Comparative study using indocyanine green and patent blue dye for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer

ackgroundLymphatic involvement is the most important prognostic factor in early-stage cervical cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a viable alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy and may identify metastases more precisely.ObjectiveTo compare...

The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

Targeted lymphadenectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer cT1-3N1M0 after neoadjuvant polychemotherapy

Targeted lymphadenectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer cT1-3N1M0 after neoadjuvant polychemotherapy

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer. Experience in implementing at the regional level. Priority issues

Background. Despite the fact that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients has become a routine diagnostic procedure, it is still of great interest to researchers, since the priority issues of choosing methodology, equipment, technology, and stages of use are still being discussed. Although all obstacles to this technique implementation into routine clinical practice have been eliminated, SLNB in locally advanced breast cancer is still rarely used. We describe the experience of implementing SLNB in Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary. We also discuss organizational, tactical, and practical approaches aimed to minimize the number of errors in technical terms, as well as to choose a multidisciplinary approach to the development of regulations for the examination and treatment of patients with locally advanced breast cancer.Aim. To assess the efficacy of SLNB implementation for patients with locally advanced breast cancer at the regional level.Materials and methods. This study included 500 patients with invasive (T1–2) breast cancer with clinically negative sentinel lymph nodes of all immunohistochemical subtypes that had undergone SLNB and histological examination. Sentinel lymph nodes were visualized using the radioisotope colloid 99mTc-Nanotop. We present the implementation algorithm for this procedure into routine clinical practice and evaluate short-term results.Results. A total of 500 patients have undergone SLNB. The first 30 cases were considered pilot cases, where all patients positive for sentinel lymph nodes additionally underwent standard axillary lymph node dissection. We observed a 100 % concordance of histological results. Then the surgery was routinely performed for all patients from this category. The assessment of short-term surgical outcomes demonstrated significant improvement of the postoperative period, reduced frequency of postoperative complications (persistent seroma of the axillary area to 2.85 %), reduced length of hospital stay (by 52.7 %) and improved functional and aesthetic results in the majority (&gt;62 %) of patients.Conclusion. Our algorithm of SLNB use in patients with breast cancer in routine clinical practice at the regional level allows for rapid method implementation, reduced length of hospital stay, better functional and aesthetic results, and lower incidence of persistent seroma of the axillary area.

Personalized neck irradiation guided by sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx with a clinically negative neck: (Chemo)radiotherapy to the PRIMary tumor only. Protocol of the PRIMO study

BackgroundElective neck irradiation (ENI) is performed in head and neck cancer patients treated with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy. The aim is to eradicate nodal metastases that are not detectable by pretreatment imaging techniques. It is conceivable that personalized neck irradiation can be performed guided by the results of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). It is expected that ENI can be omitted to one or both sides of the neck in 9 out of 10 patients, resulting in less radiation side effects with better quality of life. Methods/designThis is a multicenter randomized controlled trial aiming to compare safety and efficacy of treatment with SLNB guided neck irradiation versus standard bilateral ENI in 242 patients with cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx for whom bilateral ENI is indicated. Patients randomized to the experimental-arm will undergo SLNB. Based on the histopathologic status of the SLNs, patients will receive no ENI (if all SLNs are negative), unilateral neck irradiation only (if a SLN is positive at one side of the neck) or bilateral neck irradiation (if SLNs are positive at both sides of the neck). Patients randomized to the control arm will not undergo SLNB but will receive standard bilateral ENI. The primary safety endpoint is the number of patients with recurrence in regional lymph nodes within 2 years after treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint is patient reported xerostomia-related quality of life at 6 months after treatment. DiscussionIf this trial demonstrates that the experimental treatment is non-inferior to the standard treatment in terms of regional recurrence and is superior in terms of xerostomia-related quality of life, this will become the new standard of care.

Clinical relevance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early ovarian cancer.

The first-line treatment for early ovarian cancer typically involves primary debulking surgery aimed at maximal cytoreduction, alongside adjuvant chemotherapy if clinically indicated. Nodal assessment involving pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection is typically performed during the primary debulking surgery. However, the survival benefit of lymphadenectomy in patients with early ovarian cancer has not been well established, and the procedure is associated with longer operation time and higher perioperative complications. With the emergence of minimally invasive surgery as a potential alternative to laparotomy for early ovarian cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy has been evaluated in this setting. In this review, we summarized the current literature regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early ovarian cancer, focusing on the clinical relevance of this method, including its detection rate and diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, we discuss the current status of clinical trials investigating sentinel lymph node biopsy in early ovarian cancer cases.