Lung Resection In Patients Research Articles

Sepsis after major cancer surgery

BackgroundCancer patients undergoing procedures are at increased risk of sepsis. We sought to evaluate the incidence of postoperative sepsis following major cancer surgeries (MCS), and to describe patient and/or hospital characteristics associated with heightened risk. MethodsPatients undergoing 1 of 8 MCS (colectomy, cystectomy, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, hysterectomy, lung resection, pancreatectomy, and prostatectomy) within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1999–2009 were identified (N = 2,502,710). Logistic regression models fitted with generalized estimating equations were used to estimate primary predictors (procedure, age, gender, race, insurance, Charlson Comorbidity Index, hospital volume, and hospital bed size) effect on sepsis and sepsis-associated mortality. Trends were evaluated with linear regression. ResultsThe incidence of MCS-related sepsis increased 2.0% per year (P < 0.001), whereas mortality remained stable. Odds of sepsis were highest among esophagectomy patients (odds ratio [OR]: 3.13, 2.76–3.55) and those with non-private insurance (OR: 1.33, 1.19–1.48 to OR: 1.89, 1.71–2.09). Odds of sepsis-related mortality were highest among lung resection patients (OR: 2.30, 2.00–2.64) and those experiencing perioperative liver failure (OR: 5.68, 4.30–7.52). Increasing hospital volume was associated with lower odds of sepsis and sepsis-related mortality (OR: 0.89, 0.84–0.95 to OR: 0.58, 0.53–0.62 and OR: 0.88, 0.77–0.99 to OR: 0.78, 0.67–0.93). ConclusionsBetween 1999 and 2009, the incidence of MCS-related sepsis increased; however, sepsis-related mortality remained stable. Significant disparities exist in patient and hospital characteristics associated with MCS-related sepsis. Hospital volume is an important modifiable risk factor associated with improved sepsis-related outcomes following MCS.

“Open lung ventilation optimizes pulmonary function during lung surgery”

BackgroundWe evaluated an “open lung” ventilation (OV) strategy using low tidal volumes, low respiratory rate, low FiO2, and high continuous positive airway pressure in patients undergoing major lung resections. Materials and methodsIn this phase I pilot study, twelve consecutive patients were anesthetized using conventional ventilator settings (CV) and then OV strategy during which oxygenation and lung compliance were noted. Subsequently, a lung resection was performed. Data were collected during both modes of ventilation in each patient, with each patient acting as his own control. The postoperative course was monitored for complications. ResultsTwelve patients underwent open thoracotomies for seven lobectomies and five segmentectomies. The OV strategy provided consistent one-lung anesthesia and improved static compliance (40 ± 7 versus 25 ± 4 mL/cm H2O, P = 0.002) with airway pressures similar to CV. Postresection oxygenation (SpO2/FiO2) was better during OV (433 ± 11 versus 386 ± 15, P = 0.008). All postoperative chest x-rays were free of atelectasis or infiltrates. No patient required supplemental oxygen at any time postoperatively or on discharge. The mean hospital stay was 4 ± 1 d. There were no complications or mortality. ConclusionsThe OV strategy, previously shown to have benefits during mechanical ventilation of patients with respiratory failure, proved safe and effective in lung resection patients. Because postoperative pulmonary complications may be directly attributable to the anesthetic management, adopting an OV strategy that optimizes lung mechanics and gas exchange may help reduce postoperative problems and improve overall surgical results. A randomized trial is planned to ascertain whether this technique will reduce postoperative pulmonary complications.

Invited Commentary

The Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) has been widely used to predict risk of cardiovascular complications in major noncardiac surgery. Though nearly ubiquitous, the RCRI was not designed specifically for patients undergoing major thoracic surgery, and it has been shown to perform poorly in lung resection patients. With this in mind, Ferguson and colleagues [1] have validated a thoracic-specific RCRI (ThRCRI) using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) General Thoracic Database of patients undergoing elective major lung resection (resection of lobe or greater).

Lobectomy in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

Some patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) develop severe but localized lung disease or recurrent hemoptysis⁄pneumothorax refractory to conventional medical therapies. The outcomes of lung resection in patients with CF and worsening localized lung disease or recurrent hemoptysis⁄pneumothorax refractory to conventional therapy (n=15) were evaluated by reviewing the medical records of all patients with CF followed at the CF Center at Nationwide Children's Hospital (Columbus, Ohio, USA), who underwent lobectomy over a 15-year period (1998 to 2012). The median age of the 15 patients (93% Caucasian) was 20 years (range two to 41 years) and their mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was 59.5% of predicted one year before surgery. Three patients died within two years after lobectomy; all three deaths occurred in patients with an FEV1 ≤40% of predicted before surgery. There were no significant changes in mean height, weight, body mass index, hospital admissions or antibiotic use over time. The mean FEV1 decreased over time. Compared with at surgery, decline in FEV1 in the year before surgery was -5.4% (P=0.024) and decline in the year after surgery was -1.3% (P=0.513); however, the difference in the rate of decline was not statistically significant. In patients with CF and localized worsening bronchiectasis and⁄or recurrent hemoptysis⁄pneumothorax, lobectomy carried a significant risk of mortality, especially in patients with FEV1 ≤40% of predicted, and should only be considered when all other measures fail.

Does the revised cardiac risk index predict cardiac complications following elective lung resection?

BackgroundRevised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) score and Thoracic Revised Cardiac Risk Index (ThRCRI) score were developed to predict the risks of postoperative major cardiac complications in generic surgical population and thoracic surgery respectively. This study aims to determine the accuracy of these scores in predicting the risk of developing cardiac complications including atrial arrhythmias after lung resection surgery in adults.MethodsWe studied 703 patients undergoing lung resection surgery in a tertiary thoracic surgery centre. Observed outcome measures of postoperative cardiac morbidity and mortality were compared against those predicted by risk.ResultsPostoperative major cardiac complications and supraventricular arrhythmias occurred in 4.8% of patients. Both index scores had poor discriminative ability for predicting postoperative cardiac complications with an area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.59 (95% CI 0.51-0.67) for the RCRI score and 0.57 (95% CI 0.49-0.66) for the ThRCRI score.ConclusionsIn our cohort, RCRI and ThRCRI scores failed to accurately predict the risk of cardiac complications in patients undergoing elective resection of lung cancer. The British Thoracic Society (BTS) recommendation to seek a cardiology referral for all asymptomatic pre-operative lung resection patients with > 3 RCRI risk factors is thus unlikely to be of clinical benefit.

¿Es una buena opción terapéutica la cirugía pulmonar en pacientes mayores de 80 años?

IntroductionThe number of geriatric patients with lung cancer is expected to increase in the next few years, especially patients over 80, and therefore it is important to know where the therapeutic limits should be drawn. Is surgery a good option in patients over 80? ObjectiveTo show the results of lung resection in patients over 80 years of age to evaluate the safety and short-term results. Material and methodsRetrospective study of 21 patients who underwent lung resection between October 1999 and October 2011. ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 82±2; 13 lobectomies were performed,5 transegmental resections, 2 segmentectomies, and 1 pneumonectomy. Postoperative complications (28.6%) were: respiratory 66.6%, cardiological 16.7% and digestive 16,7%. Perioperative mortality was 9,5% (2). There was a significant association between mortality and age (P=.023), or pneumonectomy (P=.002). We studied COPD as a risk factor for mortality and found a statistically significant relation with the need for ICU (P<.007), and the appearance of complications (P<.044). ConclusionsResective lung surgery is feasible and safe in selected patients over 80 years of age. In our experience, squamous cell carcinoma was the most frequent tumor. The most common procedure was lobectomy which is a safe technique with a low complicaction rate in elderly patients. Pneumonectomy s hould be avoided, as we have found a significant association with perioperative mortality.

A New Method to Predict Postoperative Lung Function: Quantitative Breath Sound Measurements

Currently, predicted postoperative (PPO) lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [PPO-FEV(1)] and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [PPO-Dlco]) estimated from spirometry and regional perfusion is used to select patients for lung resection. Vibration response imaging (VRI) analyzes lung sounds and quantifies regional acoustic energy. Single-center studies suggest that this noninvasive, radiation-free method of quantifying lung function is comparable to the reference standard. A prospective, multiinstitutional United States study comparing VRI with perfusion in patient assessment for lung resection enrolled 163 patients, with 135 currently available for analysis. PPO values were calculated by subtracting the fraction of segments to be resected in a lung (113 lobectomies, 20 pneumonectomies) multiplied by the percentage of acoustic energy (VRI) or perfusion of that lung. We compared the two methods with each other, with actual postoperative pulmonary function tests, and the rate of complications as predicted by PPO values above or below 40%. Good agreement was found between calculated estimations of postoperative lung function using VRI and perfusion measurements (PPO-FEV(1)%: r = 0.95; -8% to 11.5%; PPO-Dlco: r = 0.97; -6.6% to 9.5%), although larger discrepancies were noted between the actual VRI and perfusion measurements (-17 to 24). The VRI and perfusion methods provided excellent agreement in categorization of patients into low or elevated risk based on PPO values of above or below 40% (95% for PPO-FEV(1)%; 94% for PPO-Dlco) and similar correlations with actual postoperative values (r = 0.74 and r = 0.67 for FEV(1); r = 0.72 and r = 0.67 for Dlco). VRI may offer a simple, noninvasive, and radiation-free alternative to lung scintigraphy for predicting postoperative lung function in patients with lung malignancies.

AB 17. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) as preoperative test before lung resection

Lung resection is still the only potentially curative therapy for patients with localised non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the presence of cardiovascular comorbities and known underlying lung disease increase the risk of perioperative death and postoperative complications. Various studies have evaluated the use of different preoperative tests with aim to identify patients with impaired pulmonary function at greater risk for complications. Postoperative complications are associated with prolonged hospital stays and excessive morbidity and mortality especially in this group of patients. According to the ACCP/BTS guidelines, patients without known underlying lung disease with a preoperative FEV1 in excess of 2 L, generally tolerate pneumonectomy whereas those with FEV1 greater that 1.5 L, tolerate lobectomy. Although spirometric values strongly correlate with the severity of obstruction, they do not provide direct information regarding the degree of gas exchange impairment that is often present and the cardiovascular function. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is considered among the preoperative tests suggested before lung resection for patients with known underlying cardiovascular or lung disease. CPET is based on the interactions among the pulmonary function, the cardiovascular function and the oxygen absorption from the peripheral tissues. Patients with maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) <10 mL/kg/min or those with VO2 max <15 mL/kg/min and both postoperative FEV1 and DLCO <40% predicted are considered to be at high risk for perioperative death and cardiopulmonary complications postoperatively. Studies have shown that oxygen uptake efficiency slope, oxygen pulse and heart rate at peak exercise are correlated with better postoperative outcome.

Impact of interstitial lung disease on short-term and long-term survival of patients undergoing surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of risk factors

The study aimed to determine the impact of interstitial lung disease (ILD) on postoperative morbidity, mortality and long-term survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing pulmonary resection. We performed a retrospective chart review of 775 consecutive patients who had undergone lung resection for NSCLC between 2000 and 2009. ILD, defined by medical history, physical examination and abnormalities compatible with bilateral lung fibrosis on high-resolution computed tomography, was diagnosed in 37 (4.8%) patients (ILD group). The remaining 738 patients were classified as non-ILD (control group). We also attempted to identify the predictive factors for early and late survival in patients with ILD following pulmonary resection. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age (69 vs 66 years), sex (79 vs 72% male), smoking history (93 vs 90% smokers), forced expiratory volume in 1 s % of predicted (89 vs 84%), predicted values of forced vital capacity (FVC)% (92 vs 94%), types of surgical resection and histology. Patients with ILD had a higher incidence of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; 13 vs 1.8%, P < 0.01) and higher postoperative mortality (8 vs 1.4%, P < 0.01). The overall 5-year survival rate was 52% in the ILD and 65% in the non-ILD patients, respectively (P = 0.019). In the ILD group, at the median follow-up of 26 months (range 4-119), 19 (51%) patients were still alive and 18 (49%) had died in the ILD group. The major cause of late death was respiratory failure due to the progression of fibrosis (n = 7, 39%). In the ILD group, lower preoperative FVC% (mean 77 vs 93%, P < 0.01) and lower diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO%; 47 vs 62%; P < 0.01) were significantly associated with postoperative ARDS. In conclusion, major lung resection in patients with NSCLC and ILD is associated with an increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Patients with a low preoperative FVC% should be carefully assessed prior to undergoing surgery, particularly in the presence of a lower DLCO%. Long-term survival is significantly lower when compared with patients without ILD, but still achievable in a substantial subgroup. Thus, surgery can be offered to properly selected patients with lung cancer and ILD, keeping in mind the risk of respiratory failure during the evaluation of such patients.

Use of a sealant to prevent prolonged air leaks after lung resection: a prospective randomized study

BackgroundPulmonary air leaks are common complications of lung resection and result in prolonged hospital stays and increased costs. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether, compared with standard care, the use of a synthetic polyethylene glycol matrix (CoSeal®) could reduce air leaks detected by means of a digital chest drain system (DigiVent™), in patients undergoing lung resection (sutures and/or staples alone).MethodsPatients who intraoperatively showed moderate or severe air leaks (evaluated by water submersion tests) were intraoperatively randomized to receive just sutures/staples (control group) or sutures/staples plus CoSeal® (sealant group). Differences among the groups in terms of air leaks, prolonged air leaks, time to chest tube removal, length of hospital stay and related costs were assessed.ResultsIn total, 216 lung resection patients completed the study. Nineteen patients (18.1%) in the control group and 12 (10.8%) patients in the sealant group experienced postoperative air leaks, while a prolonged air leak was recorded in 11.4% (n = 12) of patients in the control group and 2.7% (n = 3) of patients in the sealant group. The difference in the incidence of air leaks and prolonged air leaks between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0013). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the sealant group (4 days) than the control group (8 days) (p = 0.0001). We also observed lower costs in the sealant group than the control group.ConclusionThe use of CoSeal® may decrease the occurrence and severity of postoperative air leaks after lung resection and is associated with shorter hospital stay.Trial registrationNot registered. The trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the IRCCS-CROB Basilicata Regional Cancer Institute, Rionero in Vulture, Italy.

VATS Lobectomy May Be a Preferable Approach to Lung Resection in Patients Over 80

VATS Lobectomy May Be a Preferable Approach to Lung Resection in Patients Over 80

Does a conservative fluid management strategy in the perioperative management of lung resection patients reduce the risk of acute lung injury?

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether a conservative fluid management strategy in the perioperative management of lung resection patients is associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative acute lung injury (PALI) and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the recovery period. Sixty-seven papers were found using the reported search, of which 13 level III and 1 level IV evidence studies represented the best evidence to answer the question. Two retrospective case-control studies demonstrated a direct association between liberal fluid intake and the incidence of PALI/ARDS following lung resection on multivariate analysis (MVA) with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.42 (95% CI 1.09-4.32, P = 0.011) and 2.91 (1.9-7.4, P = 0.001). In non-PALI/ARDS cases, the mean intraoperative fluid infusion volume was significantly less [1.22 l (1.17-1.26) vs 1.68 l (1.46-1.9) P = 0.005], the fluid balance over the first 24 postoperative hours was significantly less [1.52 l positive (1.44-1.60) vs 2.0 l positive (1.6-2.4) P = 0.026] and cumulated intra- and postoperative fluid infusion was significantly less [2.0 ml/kg/h (1.7-2.3) vs 2.6 ml/kg/h (2.3-2.9) P = 0.003]. These data show that the difference between fluid regimes associated with an increased incidence of PALI/ARDS (i.e. 'liberal') and those which are not (i.e. 'conservative') is narrow but significant. However, this does not prove a causative role for liberal fluid in the multifactorial development of PALI/ARDS. On this best evidence, we recommend intra- and postoperative maintenance fluid to be administered at 1-2 ml/kg/h and that a positive fluid balance of 1.5 l should not be exceeded in the perioperative period with caution being exercised with regard to the adequacy of oxygen delivery. If the fluid balance exceeds this threshold, a high index of suspicion for PALI/ARDS should be adopted and escalation of the level of care should be considered. If a patient develops signs of hypoperfusion after these thresholds are exceeded, inotropic/vasopressor support should be considered.

A propensity-matched comparison of survival after lung resection in patients with a high versus low body mass index

An inverse relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the risk of lung cancer has been reported in several studies. In this study, we aimed to assess whether BMI can affect survival after lung resection for cancer. We reviewed patient data for a 10-year period; 337 patients with BMI ≥ 30 who underwent lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer were identified. This group of patients was matched at a ratio of 1:1 to a group with BMI <30 and with similar characteristics such as sex, age, lung function test, history of smoking, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, stroke, myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), procedure type, histology and stage of tumour. We also used the Kaplan-Meier survival curves before and after matching for the above mentioned patient characteristics. Before adjusting for the preoperative and operative characteristics, despite more history of diabetes, hypertension and renal impairment in patients with BMI ≥ 30 compared to those with BMI <30 (BMI = 18.5-30 and < 8.5), the survival rate was found to be significantly higher when analysed univariately (P = 0.02). This difference remained significant after adjusting for all the characteristics, suggesting a significantly higher survival rate in the group with BMI ≥ 30 (P = 0.04). Unlike in breast cancer, a high BMI in lung cancer patients after resection has protective effects. This may be due to the better nutritional status of the patient, a less aggressive cancer type that has not resulted in weight loss at the time of presentation or it may be due to certain hormones released from the adipose tissue. BMI can be a predictor of outcome after lung resection in cancer patients.

Psychological conditions and analysis of nursing interventions of the of lung cancer Resection patients

Objective To evaluate the psychological state of patients with lung resection and and care interventions.Methods The hospital treated by lung resection to testify were randomly divided into experimental and control groups,experimental group of patients with an accurate psychological analysis and the enhanced care intervention in the control group with conventional care,respectively,before surgery on patients,surgery later,three months after surgery in patients with self-rating scale ( SAS )and SF-36quality of life questionnaire score.Results The group of SAS,SDS and SF-36 quality of life questionnaire scores were significantly higher ( P ＜ 0.05 ).Conclusions Perioperative lung resection for patients with psychological analysis and implementation of nursing intervention can significantly eliminate the negative emotions of patients and improve patients quality of life. Key words: Lung resection; psychological; nursing intervention;

CPAP Increases 6-Minute Walk Distance After Lung Resection Surgery

The application of CPAP has been used to minimize postoperative pulmonary complications after lung resection surgery. The aim of this study was to quantify both the CPAP effects upon lung function and functional capacity in early postoperative lung resection, as well as to evaluate if CPAP prolongs air leak through the chest drain. Thirty patients in the postoperative period of lung resection were allocated into 2 groups: an experimental group, consisting of 15 patients who underwent a 10 cm H(2)O CPAP, and a 15 patient control group, who performed breathing exercises. Arterial blood gas analysis, peak expiratory flow (PEF), respiratory muscle strength, spirometry, and 6-min walk test (6MWT) were assessed in the preoperative period, and repeated postoperatively on the first and on the seventh day (6MWT was repeated only on the seventh day). Significant increases in PEF, muscle strength, and FEV(1) between the first and seventh postoperative day were observed, both in the experimental and in the control group, whereas FVC and P(aO(2)) increased significantly between the first and seventh postoperative day only in the experimental group. The average loss in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) from preoperative to postoperative day 7 in the experimental group was significantly lower than in control group. When comparing the 2 groups, only 6MWD was statistically different (P < .001). There was no air leakage increase through the drain with the early use of CPAP. When compared to breathing exercises, CPAP increases the 6MWD in postoperative lung resection patients, without prolonging air leak through the chest drain.

Diffusing capacity predicts long-term survival after lung resection for cancer

Predictors of long-term survival for patients with lung cancer assist in individualizing treatment recommendations. Diffusing capacity (DLCO) is a predictor of complications after resection for lung cancer. We sought to determine whether DLCO is also prognostic for long-term survival after lung resection for cancer. We assessed survival among patients in our prospective database who underwent lung resection for cancer between 1980-2006. Potential prognostic factors for all-cause mortality were evaluated by computing average annual hazard rates, and variables significantly associated with survival were included in multivariable Cox modelling. Multiple imputation was used to address missing values. Among 854 unique patients, there were 587 deaths. The median follow-up time from surgery was 9.6 years. Predictors of survival included age, stage, performance status, body mass index, history of myocardial infarction, renal function and DLCO. On univariate analysis, the hazard ratio increased incrementally compared with those with a DLCO of ≥ 80% (70-79%, 1.12; 60-69%, 1.29; <60%, 1.35). On multivariable analysis, DLCO was an independent predictor of long-term survival for all patients (corrected for all other important covariates; HR 1.04 per 10-point decrement; 95% CI 1.00-1.08; P = 0.05). Its prognostic ability for long-term survival was above and beyond its influence on operative mortality. DLCO is an independent and clinically important determinant of long-term survival after major lung resection for cancer, a finding that is not generally known. Knowledge of this may help improve selection of patients for lung resection and may help tailor the extent of resection, when possible, in order to appropriately balance operative risk with long-term outcomes.

Incidence of Acute Exacerbation of Interstitial Pneumonia in Operated Lung Cancer: Institutional Report and Review

Several small studies have reported that acute exacerbation (AE) of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) can occur after lung resection for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, though the incidence rate is unclear. We examined our institutional data and performed a search of the MEDLINE database for publications regarding AE of IIP following surgery for lung cancer. Studies reporting the incidence rates of IIP and AE were included. Eleven studies including our institutional data were determined to be eligible. Seven studies designated the incidence of IIP. Of 4749 patients (from 7 studies) who underwent lung resection for NSCLC, 277 had IIP, for an incidence rate of 5.8% (range 1.1%-11.7%). Eleven studies designated the incidence of AE from IIP patient, 67 (15.8%) of 424 IIP patients (from 11 studies) developed AE after surgery, of whom 38 (56.7%) died during the postoperative course. Coexistent IIP in patients with lung cancer increases the risk of lung cancer surgery. Furthermore, AE of IIP may be a major cause of operation-related death.

Non-Invasive Pressure Support Ventilation in Major Lung Resection for High Risk Patients: Does It Matter?

Background and purpose: Patients with severely impaired pulmonary function have an increased operative risk for major lung resection. The clinical benefits of pre- and perioperative, non-invasive pressure support ventilation (NIPSV) have up to now not been extensively evaluated. Patients with severely reduced pulmonary function were investigated in this prospective and randomised single centre clinical trial. Methods: Standard pulmonary evaluation was performed in all patients before major lung resection. To predict postoperative pulmonary function, a lung perfusion-ventilation scan was carried out. All patients enrolled in the study were instructed preoperatively on how to use a NIPSV respirator. Af-ter lung resection patients were randomised either for continuation of NIPSV or for standard treatment. Results: Of the 52 patients assessed, 21 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study protocol. Predicted mean postoperative FEV1 was 1.10 L (range 0.92 - 1.27 L). Lobectomy was performed in 14 patients, pneumonectomy in 6 patients and a segmentectomy in 1 patient. No inhospital deaths occurred. Pulmonary complications (reintubation, pneumonia) were more frequent in the NIPSV group than in the control group (3 patients versus 1 patient), without statistical significance (p = 0.31). Conclusions: We observed no mortality and a low morbidity in this high risk group. Postoperative continuation of NIPSV had no beneficial effect on the clinical outcome. Preoperative conditioning with NIPSV, however, seems to be a suitable tool for patients with severely impaired pulmonary function. This study may serve therefore as basis for further investigations for the potential clinical benefits of prophylactic NIPSV in major lung surgery.

Chest Physiotherapy in Lung Resection Patients: State of the Art

The role of chest physiotherapy in limiting postoperative pulmonary complications and in the recovery of pulmonary function and exercise capacity after lung surgery is still unclear because of the lack of conclusive, well-designed clinical trials. In this article the available literature on these topics is reviewed, and the effects of respiratory physiotherapy, instituted preoperatively or administered after surgery to patients undergoing lung resection, are commented on. The authors conclude that chest physiotherapy improves preoperative exercise capacity; this is a parameter highly predictive of postoperative pulmonary complications. Also physiotherapy administered during the immediate period after lung resection probably decreases frequency of pulmonary complications. Finally, further investigation is required for a better understanding of the effects of long-term chest physiotherapy after hospital discharge in lung resection patients.

P143 Exploration of patient activity levels following thoracotomy and lung resection

BackgroundReduced activity is a routine observation following major surgery, however no studies have yet measured or explored this. Causative factors include sedative drugs, reduced exercise tolerance and pain, as well...