Lung Cancer Screening Program Research Articles

EP04.02-02 Implementation of an Integrated Lung Cancer Screening Program at a Large Academic Community Health System in the U.S

EP04.02-02 Implementation of an Integrated Lung Cancer Screening Program at a Large Academic Community Health System in the U.S

Individual- and neighborhood-level characteristics of lung cancer screening participants undergoing telemedicine shared decision making

BackgroundAlthough lung cancer screening (LCS) for high-risk individuals reduces lung cancer mortality in clinical trial settings, many questions remain about how to implement high-quality LCS in real-world programs. With the increasing use of telemedicine in healthcare, studies examining this approach in the context of LCS are urgently needed. We aimed to identify sociodemographic and other factors associated with screening completion among individuals undergoing telemedicine Shared Decision Making (SDM) for LCS.MethodsThis retrospective study examined patients who completed Shared Decision Making (SDM) via telemedicine between May 4, 2020 – March 18, 2021 in a centralized LCS program. Individuals were categorized into Complete Screening vs. Incomplete Screening subgroups based on the status of subsequent LDCT completion. A multi-level, multivariate model was constructed to identify factors associated with incomplete screening.ResultsAmong individuals undergoing telemedicine SDM during the study period, 20.6% did not complete a LDCT scan. Bivariate analysis demonstrated that Black/African-American race, Medicaid insurance status, and new patient type were associated with greater odds of incomplete screening. On multi-level, multivariate analysis, individuals who were new patients undergoing baseline LDCT or resided in a census tract with a high level of socioeconomic deprivation had significantly higher odds of incomplete screening. Individuals with a greater level of education experienced lower odds of incomplete screening.ConclusionsAmong high-risk individuals undergoing telemedicine SDM for LCS, predictors of incomplete screening included low education, high neighborhood-level deprivation, and new patient type. Future research should focus on testing implementation strategies to improve LDCT completion rates while leveraging telemedicine for high-quality LCS.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lung Cancer Screening Processes in a Northeast Tertiary Health Care Network.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted health care systems, including implementation of lung cancer screening programs. The impact and recovery from this disruption on screening processes is not well appreciated. Herein, the radiology database of a Northeast tertiary health care network was reviewed before and during the pandemic (2013-2022). In the 3 months before the pandemic, an average of 77.3 lung cancer screening with computed tomography scans (LCS-CT) were performed per month. The average dropped to 23.3 between April and June of 2020, whereas COVID-19 hospitalizations peaked at 1604. By July, average hospitalizations dropped to 50, and LCS-CTs rose to >110 per month for the remaining year. LCS-CTs did not decline during COVID-19 surges in December of 2021 and 2022. The LCS-CT performance grew by 4.5% in 2020, 69.6% in 2021, and 27.0% in 2022, exceeding projected growth by 722 examinations. This resiliency indicates a potentially smaller impact of COVID-19 on lung cancer diagnoses than initially feared.

Point-of-Care Disease Screening in Primary Care Using Saliva: A Biospectroscopy Approach for Lung Cancer and Prostate Cancer.

Saliva is a largely unexplored liquid biopsy that can be readily obtained noninvasively. Not dissimilar to blood plasma or serum, it contains a vast array of bioconstituents that may be associated with the absence or presence of a disease condition. Given its ease of access, the use of saliva is potentially ideal in a point-of-care screening or diagnostic test. Herein, we developed a swab "dip" test in saliva obtained from consenting patients participating in a lung cancer-screening programme being undertaken in north-west England. A total of 998 saliva samples (31 designated as lung-cancer positive and 17 as prostate-cancer positive) were taken in the order in which they entered the clinic (i.e., there was no selection of participants) during the course of this prospective screening programme. Samples (sterile Copan blue rayon swabs dipped in saliva) were analysed using attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy. In addition to unsupervised classification on resultant infrared (IR) spectra using principal component analysis (PCA), a range of feature selection/extraction algorithms were tested. Following preprocessing, the data were split between training (70% of samples, 22 lung-cancer positive versus 664 other) and test (30% of samples, 9 lung-cancer positive versus 284 other) sets. The training set was used for model construction and the test set was used for validation. The best model was the PCA-quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) algorithm. This PCA-QDA model was built using 8 PCs (90.4% of explained variance) and resulted in 93% accuracy for training and 91% for testing, with clinical sensitivity at 100% and specificity at 91%. Additionally, for prostate cancer patients amongst the male cohort (n = 585), following preprocessing, the data were split between training (70% of samples, 12 prostate-cancer positive versus 399 other) and test (30% of samples, 5 prostate-cancer positive versus 171 other) sets. A PCA-QDA model, again the best model, was built using 5 PCs (84.2% of explained variance) and resulted in 97% accuracy for training and 93% for testing, with clinical sensitivity at 100% and specificity at 92%. These results point to a powerful new approach towards the capability to screen large cohorts of individuals in primary care settings for underlying malignant disease.

Overcoming barriers to lung cancer screening using a systemwide approach with additional focus on the non-screened.

The lung cancer screening program at St Elizabeth Healthcare (Kentucky, USA) began in 2013. Over 33,000 low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screens have been performed. From 2015 through 2021, 2595 lung cancers were diagnosed systemwide. A Screening Program with Impactful Results from Early Detection, reviews that experience; 342 (13.2%) were diagnosed by screening and 2253 (86.8%) were non-screened. As a secondary objective, the non-screened cohort was queried to determine how many additional individuals could have been screened, identifying barriers and failures to meet eligibility. Our QlikSense database extracted the lung cancer patients from the Cancer Patient Data and Management System, and identified and categorized them separately as screened or non-screened populations. Stage distribution was compared in screened and non-screened groups. Those meeting age criteria, with any smoking history, were further queried for screening eligibility, accessing the electronic medical record smoking history and audit trail, and determining if enough information was available to substantiate screening eligibility. The same methodology was applied to CMS 2015 and USPSTF 2021 criteria. The screened and non-screened patients were accounted for in a stage migration chart demonstrating clear shift to early stage among screened lung cancer patients. Additionally, analysis of non-screened individuals is presented. Of the St Elizabeth Healthcare eligible patients attributed to primary care providers, 49.6% were screened in 2021. Despite this level of success, this study highlighted a sizeable pool of additional individuals that could have been screened. We are shifting focus to the non-screened pool of patients that meet eligibility, further enhancing the impact on our community.

The effect of the introduction of the national lung cancer screening program on short-term mortality in Korea

BackgroundSouth Korea introduced the National Lung Cancer Screening Program (NLCSP) in 2019. This study investigated the effect of the NLCSP on one-year mortality in individuals with a history of lung cancer. MethodsThis study used the 2018–2020 National Health Insurance Service claims data. The difference-in-differences approach was used to investigate the effect of participating in the NLCSP between the case and control groups before and after the intervention period. The case group included individuals aged between 54 and 74 years with a smoking history of ≥ 30 pack-years and the control group those aged between 54 and 74 years with a history of smoking of <30 pack-years and non-smokers. The pre-intervention period was from January 2018 to June 2019 and the post-intervention period from July 2019 to December 2020. ResultsThe introduction of the NLCSP was related to an overall decrease in one-year mortality (−3.21 % points, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) −4.84 to −1.58). Specifically, this reduction was significant for lung cancer related mortality (lung cancer: −2.69 % points, 95 % CI −4.24 to −1.13). Furthermore, stronger associations were found in individuals of older age, residing in non-metropolitan areas, and who visited healthcare institutions in non-metropolitan areas. ConclusionThe findings confirm a relationship between implementation of the NLCSP and one-year mortality in eligible individuals with a history of lung cancer, which is noteworthy considering that Korea is one of the first countries to include lung cancer into the national cancer screening program.

Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening in a Centralized Academic Program

BackgroundAdherence to lung cancer screening (LCS) protocols is critical for achieving mortality reductions. However, adherence rates, particularly for recommended annual screening among patients with low-risk findings, are often sub-optimal. We evaluated annual LCS adherence for patients with low-risk findings participating in a centralized screening program at a tertiary academic center. Patients and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study of a centralized lung cancer screening program launched in July 2018. We performed electronic medical review of 337 patients who underwent low-dose CT (LDCT) screening before February 1, 2021 (to ensure ≥ 15 months follow up) and had a low-risk Lung-RADS score of 1 or 2. Captured data included patient characteristics (smoking history, Fagerstrom score, environmental exposures, lung cancer risk score), LDCT imaging dates, and Lung-RADS results. The primary outcome measure was adherence to annual screening. We used multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with adherence. ResultsOverall, 337 patients had an initial Lung-RADS result of 1 (n = 189) or 2 (n = 148). Among this cohort, 139 (73.5%) of Lung-RADS 1 and 111 (75.0%) of Lung-RADS 2 patients completed the annual repeat LDCT within 15 months, respectively. The only patient characteristic associated with adherence was having Medicaid coverage; compared to having private insurance, Medicaid patients were less adherent (adjusted OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.15-0.92). No other patient characteristic was associated with adherence. ConclusionOur centralized screening program achieved a high initial annual adherence rate. Although LCS has first-dollar insurance coverage, other socioeconomic concerns may present barriers to annual screening for Medicaid recipients.

Recruitment strategies and interventions to increase participation in lung cancer screening programmes: a systematic review protocol

IntroductionDespite strong evidence for the efficacy of low-radiation dose CT (LDCT) in reducing lung cancer (LC) mortality, implementing LC screening (LCS) programmes remains a challenge. We aim to systematically review...

Rate of benign nodule resection in a lung cancer screening program

PurposeScreening with low dose computed tomography (CT) can reduce lung cancer related death at the expense of unavoidable false positive results. The purpose of this study is to measure the rate of surgery for benign nodules, and evaluate characteristics of those nodules. Materials and methodsIn this study, we evaluated patients in the Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) program across a large tertiary healthcare network from 5/2015 through 10/2021 who underwent surgical resection for a lung nodule. We reviewed the pathology reports and subsequent follow-up to establish whether the nodule was benign or malignant. Imaging characteristics of the nodules were evaluated by a radiology fellow, and we recorded Lung-RADS category, nodule status (baseline, stable, new, growing), FDG uptake on PET/CT, and calculated the risk from the Brock model. ResultsDuring this time period, a total of 21,366 LCS CT was performed in 9050 patients, and 260 patients underwent a following surgical resection. Review of the pathology results revealed: 220 lung cancer (85%), 2 other malignancies (1%), and 38 benign findings (15%). Pathology of the benign nodules was as follows: 12 with scarring/fibrosis, 5 with benign neoplasms, 14 with infection/inflammation, and 7 with other diagnoses. Lung-RADS category was as follows: 4 (11%) Lung-RADS 2, 2 (5%) Lung-Rad 3, 11 (29%) Lung-RADS 4A, 13 (34%) Lung-RADS 4B, and 8 (21%) Lung-RADS 4X. The size of the nodules ranged from 4 to 41 mm with a median of 13 mm. 2 (5%) were ground glass, 10 (26%) were part-solid, and 26 (68%) were solid. FDG-PET/CT was performed in 19 out of 38 cases, of which: 2 (11%) had no uptake, 10 (53%) had mild uptake, 3 (16%) had moderate uptake, and 4 (21%) had intense uptake. Risk assessment by Brock calculator revealed that 9 (24) had <5% (very low) risk; 27 (71%) had 5–65% (low-intermediate) risk, and 2 (5%) had >65% (high) risk. ConclusionSurgical resection of benign nodules is unavoidable despite application of Lung-RADS guidelines in a modern screening program, with approximately 15% of surgeries being done for benign lesions.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Risk Factor-Based Lung Cancer Screening Program by Low-Dose Computer Tomography in Current Smokers in China.

Although the effectiveness of lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) could be shown in China, there could be variation in the evidence concerning the economic impact. Our study explores the cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening and optimizes the best definition of a high-risk population. A Markov model consisting of the natural history and post-diagnosis states was constructed to estimate the costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of LDCT screening compared with no screening. A total of 36 distinct risk factor-based screening strategies were assessed by incorporating starting ages of 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 and 65 years, stopping ages of 69, 74 and 79 years as well as smoking eligibility criteria. Screening data came from community-based mass screening with LDCT for lung cancer in Guangzhou. Compared with no screening, all screening scenarios led to incremental costs and QALYs. When the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was USD37,653, three times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in China, six of nine strategies on the efficiency frontier may be cost-effective. Annual screening between 55 and 79 years of age for those who smoked more than 20 pack-years, which yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD35,000.00 per QALY gained, was considered optimal. In sensitivity analyses, the result was stable in most cases. The trends of the results are roughly the same in scenario analyses. According to the WTP threshold of different regions, the optimal screening strategies were annual screening for those who smoked more than 20 pack-years, between 50 and 79 years of age in Zhejiang province, 55-79 years in Guangdong province and 65-74 years in Yunnan province. However, annual screening was unlikely to be cost-effective in Heilongjiang province under our modelling assumptions, indicating that tailored screening policies should be made regionally according to the local epidemiological and economic situation.

Swiss Pilot Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Study: First Baseline Screening Results.

This pilot study conducted in Switzerland aims to assess the implementation, execution, and performance of low-dose CT lung cancer screening (LDCT-LCS). With lung cancer being the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Switzerland, the study seeks to explore the potential impact of screening on reducing mortality rates. However, initiating a lung cancer screening program poses challenges and depends on country-specific factors. This prospective study, initiated in October 2018, enrolled participants meeting the National Lung Cancer Study criteria or a lung cancer risk above 1.5% according to the PLCOm2012 lung cancer risk-model. LDCT scans were assessed using Lung-RADS. Enrollment and follow-up are ongoing. To date, we included 112 participants, with a median age of 62 years (IQR 57-67); 42% were female. The median number of packs smoked each year was 45 (IQR 38-57), and 24% had stopped smoking before enrollment. The mean PLCOm2012 was 3.7% (±2.5%). We diagnosed lung cancer in 3.6% of participants (95%, CI:1.0-12.1%), with various stages, all treated with curative intent. The recall rate for intermediate results (Lung-RADS 3,4a) was 15%. LDCT-LCS in Switzerland, using modified inclusion criteria, is feasible. Further analysis will inform the potential implementation of a comprehensive lung cancer screening program in Switzerland.

The radiology quality assurance process in the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial, and findings from the baseline round of low dose CT screening for lung cancer.

As lung cancer screening is rolled-out, there is a need to develop an effective quality assurance (QA) framework around radiology reporting to ensure optimal implementation. Here, we report a structured QA process for low-dose CT (LDCT) scans performed in the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial. Negative LDCT scans were single read after using computer-aided detection software. The radiology QA process included reviewing 5% of negative scans selected at random, and all cases with a subsequent diagnosis of extrapulmonary cancer or interval lung cancer not detected on the baseline scan. Radiologists were not informed of the reason for review and original radiology reports were scored as either "satisfactory", "satisfactory with learning points", or "unsatisfactory". From 6650 participants undergoing LDCT screening, 208 negative scans were reviewed alongside 11 cases with subsequent extrapulmonary cancer and 10 cases with interval lung cancer. Overall, only three reports were ultimately judged "unsatisfactory", 1% of randomly selected negative scans (n = 2/208) and one interval lung cancer scan (n = 1/10). Four out of a total of five cases judged "satisfactory with learning points" were related to oesophageal abnormalities where the participant was subsequently diagnosed with oesophageal cancer. The described process attempts to minimise bias in retrospective review of screening scans, and may represent a framework for future QA of national screening programmes. This study describes a structured QA process for a lung cancer screening programme, involving blinded second-read of LDCT screening scans to ensure fair, constructive audit of clinical performance.

Addressing Inequity in Spatial Access to Lung Cancer Screening.

The successful implementation of an equitable lung cancer screening program requires consideration of factors that influence accessibility to screening services. Using lung cancer cases in British Columbia (BC), Canada, as a proxy for a screen-eligible population, spatial access to 36 screening sites was examined using geospatial mapping and vehicle travel time from residential postal code at diagnosis to the nearest site. The impact of urbanization and Statistics Canada's Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation were examined. Median travel time to the nearest screening site was 11.7 min (interquartile range 6.2-23.2 min). Urbanization was significantly associated with shorter drive time (p < 0.001). Ninety-nine percent of patients with ≥60 min drive times lived in rural areas. Drive times were associated with sex, ethnocultural composition, situational vulnerability, economic dependency, and residential instability. For example, the percentage of cases with drive times ≥60 min among the least deprived situational vulnerability group was 4.7% versus 44.4% in the most deprived group. Populations at risk in rural and remote regions may face more challenges accessing screening services due to increased travel times. Drive times increased with increasing sociodemographic and economic deprivations highlighting groups that may require support to ensure equitable access to lung cancer screening.

727 The UK Targeted Lung Cancer Screening Pilot Programme: The Southampton Experience

Abstract Aim Performance of the community-based targeted lung cancer screening pilot. Method 22,829 people between the age of 55 and 75 with a smoking history were invited to attend a one stop assessment inolving a questionnaire-based interview with a nurse, cardio-respiratory observations, and then spirometry. The patient’s risk of developing lung cancer was quantified using the Liverpool Lung Project (LLP) or PLCOm2012. Participants were offered low dose CT-scan (LDCT) if the calculated risk was greater or equal to 2.5% or 1.51% respectively. Pulmonary nodules found was followed up in a protocolised fashion. Results As of June 2022, 7754 patients had attended. Of these 4562 (59%) were invited for a follow-up scan and 820 (11%) of the follow-up patients required a second follow-up scan. 1,163 (25%) of the attendees have been referred onward as 2-week lung cancer or other specialities such respiratory and vascular. 117 (1.5%) of screened patients were diagnosed with lung cancer and staged histogically. 83 (73%) of confirmed lung cancer were in stage 1, while 10, 15, and 7 people in stages 2, 3 and 4 respectivey. Conclusions Targeted community-based lung cancer screening programme can detect curable early-stage lung cancer at risk groups.

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Where Do We Stand?

In the last two decades, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has gained popularity as a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) alternative to multi- and uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). With this approach, the surgeon obviates the known drawbacks of conventional MIS, such as the reduced in-depth perception, hand-eye coordination, and freedom of motion of the instruments. Previous studies have shown that a robotic approach for operable lung cancer has treatment outcomes comparable to other MIS techniques such as multi-and uniportal VATS, but with less blood loss, a lower conversion rate to open surgery, better lymph node dissection rates, and improved ergonomics for the surgeon. The thoracic surgeon of the future is expected to perform more complex procedures. More patients will enter a multimodal treatment scheme making surgery more difficult due to severe inflammation. Furthermore, due to lung cancer screening programs, the number of patients presenting with operable smaller lung nodules in the periphery of the lung will increase. This, combined with the fact that segmentectomy is becoming an increasingly popular treatment for small peripheral lung lesions, indicates that the future thoracic surgeons need to have profound knowledge of segmental resections. New imaging techniques will help them to locate these lesions and to achieve a complete oncologic resection. Current robotic techniques exist to help the thoracic surgeon overcome these challenges. In this review, an update of the latest MIS approaches and nodule detection techniques will be given.

Optimizing Longitudinal Tobacco Cessation Treatment in Lung Cancer Screening

Nearly half of the 14.8 million US adults eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS) smoke cigarettes. The optimal smoking cessation program components for the LCS setting are unclear. To assess the effect of adding a referral to prescription medication therapy management (MTM) to the tobacco longitudinal care (TLC) program among patients eligible for LCS who smoke and do not respond to early tobacco treatment and to assess the effect of decreasing the intensity of TLC among participants who do respond to early treatment. This randomized clinical trial included patients who currently smoked cigarettes daily and were eligible for LCS. Recruitment took place at primary care centers and LCS programs at 3 large health systems in the US and began in October 2016, and 18-month follow-up was completed April 2021. (1) TLC comprising intensive telephone coaching and combination nicotine replacement therapy for 1 year with at least monthly contact; (2) TLC with MTM, MTM offered pharmacist-referral for prescription medications; and (3) Quarterly TLC, intensity of TLC was decreased to quarterly contact. Intervention assignments were based on early response to tobacco treatment (abstinence) that was assessed either 4 weeks or 8 weeks after treatment initiation. Self-reported, 6-month prolonged abstinence at 18-month. Of 636 participants, 228 (35.9%) were female, 564 (89.4%) were White individuals, and the median (IQR) age was 64.3 (59.6-68.8) years. Four weeks or 8 weeks after treatment initiation, 510 participants (80.2%) continued to smoke (ie, early treatment nonresponders) and 126 participants (19.8%) had quit (ie, early treatment responders). The 18 month follow-up survey response rate was 83.2% (529 of 636). Across TLC groups at 18 months follow-up, the overall 6-month prolonged abstinence rate was 24.4% (129 of 529). Among the 416 early treatment nonresponders, 6-month prolonged abstinence for TLC with MTM vs TLC was 17.8% vs 16.4% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.13; 95% CI, 0.67-1.89). In TLC with MTM, 98 of 254 participants (39%) completed at least 1 MTM visit. Among 113 early treatment responders, 6-month prolonged abstinence for Quarterly TLC vs TLC was 24 of 55 (43.6%) vs 34 of 58 (58.6%) (aOR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.25-1.17). In this randomized clinical trial, adding referral to MTM with TLC for participants who did not respond to early treatment did not improve smoking abstinence. Stepping down to Quarterly TLC among early treatment responders is not recommended. Integrating longitudinal tobacco cessation care with LCS is feasible and associated with clinically meaningful quit rates. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02597491.

Rural barriers and facilitators of lung cancer screening program implementation in the veterans health administration: a qualitative study.

To assess healthcare professionals' perceptions of rural barriers and facilitators of lung cancer screening program implementation in a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) setting through a series of one-on-one interviews with healthcare team members. Based on measures developed using Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM), we conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study consisting of one-on-one semi-structured telephone interviews with VHA healthcare team members at 10 Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMCs) between December 2020 and September 2021. An iterative inductive and deductive approach was used for qualitative analysis of interview data, resulting in the development of a conceptual model to depict rural barriers and facilitators of lung cancer screening program implementation. A total of 30 interviews were completed among staff, providers, and lung cancer screening program directors and a conceptual model of rural barriers and facilitators of lung cancer screening program implementation was developed. Major themes were categorized within institutional and patient environments. Within the institutional environment, participants identified systems-level (patient communication, resource availability, workload), provider-level (attitudes and beliefs, knowledge, skills and capabilities), and external (regional and national networks, incentives) barriers to and facilitators of lung cancer screening program implementation. Within the patient environment, participants revealed patient-level (modifiable vulnerabilities) barriers and facilitators as well as ecological modifiers (community) that influence screening behavior. Understanding rural barriers to and facilitators of lung cancer screening program implementation as perceived by healthcare team members points to opportunities and approaches for improving lung cancer screening reach, implementation and effectiveness in VHA rural settings.

Invitation strategies and participation in a community-based lung cancer screening programme located in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation

IntroductionAlthough lung cancer screening is being implemented in the UK, there is uncertainty about the optimal invitation strategy. Here, we report participation in a community screening programme following a population-based...

Managing Persistent Subsolid Nodules in Lung Cancer: Education, Decision Making, and Impact of Interval Growth Patterns.

With the popularization of lung cancer screening, many persistent subsolid nodules (SSNs) have been identified clinically, especially in Asian non-smokers. However, many studies have found that SSNs exhibit heterogeneous growth trends during long-term follow ups. This article adopted a narrative approach to extensively review the available literature on the topic to explore the definitions, rationale, and clinical application of different interval growths of subsolid pulmonary nodule management and follow-up strategies. The development of SSN growth thresholds with different growth patterns could support clinical decision making with follow-up guidelines to reduce over- and delayed diagnoses. In conclusion, using different SSN growth thresholds could optimize the follow-up management and clinical decision making of SSNs in lung cancer screening programs. This could further reduce the lung cancer mortality rate and potential harm from overdiagnosis and over management.

Imaging Follow-Up of Nonsurgical Therapies for Lung Cancer: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

Lung cancer continues to be the most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. In the past decade, with the implementation of lung cancer screening programs and advances in surgical and nonsurgical therapies, the survival of patients with lung cancer has increased, as has the number of imaging studies that these patients undergo. However, most patients with lung cancer do not undergo surgical re-section, because they have comorbid disease or lung cancer in an advanced stage at diagnosis. Nonsurgical therapies have continued to evolve with a growing range of systemic and targeted therapies, and there has been an associated evolution in the imaging findings encountered at follow-up examinations after such therapies (e.g., with respect to posttreatment changes, treatment complications, and recurrent tumor). This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review describes the current status of nonsurgical therapies for lung cancer and their expected and unexpected imaging manifestations. The goal is to provide guidance to radiologists regarding imaging assessment after such therapies, focusing mainly on non-small cell lung cancer. Covered therapies include systemic therapy (conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy), radiotherapy, and thermal ablation.