Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutations Research Articles

Impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms on severe hepatotoxicity induced by EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations.

Many patients are forced to discontinue treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), particularly gefitinib, due to severe hepatotoxicity. Here, we investigated the association between the rate of severe hepatotoxicity and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in metabolic enzymes. Multi-SNP analyses were performed in 60 patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer using blood samples obtained prior to starting treatment with gefitinib. The poor metabolizer (PM) phenotype was defined as homozygosity or double heterozygosity for variant alleles that confer reduced enzyme activities. Associated enzymes were screened using univariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for multiplicity and were further evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine the influence of these enzymes on severe hepatotoxicity. Severe hepatotoxicity was detected in 19 (32%) of the 60 patients. Patient phenotypes consisted of CYP3A5, PM/non-PM (31/29) and CYP2D6, PM/non-PM (5/55). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, the rate of severe hepatotoxicity was significantly higher among patients with PM phenotypes than those without (CYP3A5 PM vs. non-PM: 48.4% vs. 13.8%, P=0.0069; CYP2D6 PM vs. non-PM: 80.0% vs. 27.3%, P=0.0364). Of the 9 patients switched from gefitinib to erlotinib due to severe hepatotoxicity, 8 had a PM phenotype for CYP2D6 or CYP3A5. All cases were successfully managed without exacerbation of severe hepatotoxicity. Evaluation of SNPs in CYP3A5 and CYP2D6 can effectively predict severe hepatotoxicity induced by gefitinib. Erlotinib can be used as an alternative treatment for patients who develop gefitinib-induced severe hepatotoxicity.

121P - Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Predicts the Efficacy of EGFR-TKI in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutations

121P - Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Predicts the Efficacy of EGFR-TKI in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutations

Clinical Trials in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Biomarker-Driven Treatment Allocation: Ready or Not, Here We Come.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality. Great advances in non-small cell lung cancer therapy have been seen in the last decade, beginning with the success in treating lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations and ALK-gene rearrangements. The potential of these biomarker-driven therapies has propelled research in biomarker targeted approaches to the forefront of lung cancer research. The successful development of immunotherapeutic agents targeting PD-L1 and PD-1 with an associated non-genomic biomarker has opened a new front in the effort for targeted approaches. Although early-phase lung cancer studies have hinted at the potential to use biomarkers to select patients for allocation to treatment in the conduct of clinical trials, data from late-phase studies have tempered expectations. The data leave unclear the wisdom of routinely restricting enrollment on lung cancer clinical trials to biomarker restricted populations, particularly non-genomic biomarkers.

Retrospective chart review of end-of-life (EOL) care in patients with metastatic lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations.

126 Background: Metastatic lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the US. In the last decade, however, patients (pts) with EGFR mutations have benefitted from improved outcomes with EGFR-directed targeted therapy. We hypothesized that this improvement might impact EOL care. The objective of this chart review was to describe the care of EGFR mutant pts with attention to EOL care, health care utilization, and palliative care use. Methods: With IRB approval, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of pts at our center diagnosed with advanced EGFR-mutant lung cancer from January 2009 to June 2012. We limited the review to pts who had at least one cancer therapy at MGH, and to those who died by June 2014. Results: 44 pts were included. 30 pts (68%) were female. 32 pts (73%) received cancer-directed therapy within 30 days of death. Of these, 30 pts (68%) received oral chemotherapy and 5 (11%) received IV chemotherapy. 30 pts (68%) were hospitalized within 30 days of death. Over their entire disease course, the median number of hospitalizations was 2 (0-8), and the median number of total inpatient days was 12 (0-88). 21 pts (48%) had a palliative care outpatient visit and 34 (77%) had an inpatient palliative care consult at some point during their care. 24 pts (54%) enrolled on hospice prior to death, 15 (34%) were never on hospice, and the hospice status of 5 (11%) was unknown. Of the 39 pts with known hospice status, median length of stay was 6 days (0-206). 23 pts (52%) died at home with hospice or in an inpatient hospice, 16 (36%) died in the hospital, 2 (4%) died at home without hospice, and the location of death was unknown for 3 (7%). Conclusions: Pts with EGFR mutations had high rates of hospitalization and chemotherapy use in the last month of life, and many died in the hospital. Palliative care utilization was high, but it is unclear how this affected EOL care. Designing innovative care models to support this unique population and understand EOL decision-making should be a priority.

Erlotinib alone or with bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (JO25567): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study

With use of EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor monotherapy for patients with activating EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), median progression-free survival has been extended to about 12 months. Nevertheless, new strategies are needed to further extend progression-free survival and overall survival with acceptable toxicity and tolerability for this population. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab compared with erlotinib alone in patients with non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR mutation-positive disease. In this open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study, patients from 30 centres across Japan with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease received erlotinib 150 mg/day plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or erlotinib 150 mg/day monotherapy as a first-line therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, as determined by an independent review committee. Randomisation was done with a dynamic allocation method, and the analysis used a modified intention-to-treat approach, including all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had tumour assessment at least once after randomisation. This study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, number JapicCTI-111390. Between Feb 21, 2011, and March 5, 2012, 154 patients were enrolled. 77 were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib and bevacizumab and 77 to erlotinib alone, of whom 75 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 77 in the erlotinib alone group were included in the efficacy analyses. Median progression-free survival was 16·0 months (95% CI 13·9-18·1) with erlotinib plus bevacizumab and 9·7 months (5·7-11·1) with erlotinib alone (hazard ratio 0·54, 95% CI 0·36-0·79; log-rank test p=0·0015). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were rash (19 [25%] patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group vs 15 [19%] patients in the erlotinib alone group), hypertension (45 [60%] vs eight [10%]), and proteinuria (six [8%] vs none). Serious adverse events occurred at a similar frequency in both groups (18 [24%] patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 19 [25%] patients in the erlotinib alone group). Erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination could be a new first-line regimen in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Further investigation of the regimen is warranted. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd.

Value of carcinoembryonic antigen levels in predicting the efficacy of EGFR-TKI in advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations

To explore the relevance of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level and efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. Between September 2010 and December 2013, 170 NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations receiving EGFR-TKI treatment at pulmonary medicine department of Shanghai Chest hospital were retrospectively screened. They were screened for clinical characteristics, efficacy of EGFR-TKI, and tumor markers (CEA/cytokerantin-19-fragment CYFRA21-1) at an initial diagnosis. The cutoff value for CEA was 5 µg/L. The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 37.6% and disease control rate (DCR) 90.0%. Those with high CEA levels (>5 µg/L) had better DCR (94.3% vs 80.4%, P = 0.022). Univariate analysis showed that patients with high CEA levels ( ≥ 20 µg/L) had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those with low CEA level (HR = 1.444, 95%CI: 1.036-2.014, P = 0.030). HR value increased with rising CEA levels. No significant difference in PFS existed between high-CYFRA21-1 and normal-CYFRA21-1 groups (HR = 1.167, 95%CI: 0.840-1.622, P = 0.357). Close follow-ups were conducted for 51 patients on EGFR-TKI treatment. And their CEA levels was tested within one month after treatment. The patients in descending type group had longer PFS than other two types (HR = 7.344, 95%CI: 2.903-18.578, P < 0.001). CEA level has a close correlation with the efficacy of EGFR-TKI treatment. And a high CEA level may be a predictive marker for better response and longer PFS in advanced NSCLC.

Clinical impact of gastric acid suppressing medication use on the efficacy of elrotinib and gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations.

8108 Background: Gastric acid suppressing medications (AS), namely, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RA), increase the gastric pH, which may reduce the absorpti...

Network Meta-Analysis of Erlotinib, Gefitinib, Afatinib and Icotinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutations

BackgroundSeveral EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) including erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib and icotinib are currently available as treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbor EGFR mutations. However, no head to head trials between these TKIs in mutated populations have been reported, which provides room for indirect and integrated comparisons.MethodsWe searched electronic databases for eligible literatures. Pooled data on objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) were calculated. Appropriate networks for different outcomes were established to incorporate all evidences. Multiple-treatments comparisons (MTCs) based on Bayesian network integrated the efficacy and specific toxicities of all included treatments.ResultsTwelve phase III RCTs that investigated EGFR-TKIs involving 1821 participants with EGFR mutation were included. For mutant patients, the weighted pooled ORR and 1-year PFS of EGFR-TKIs were significant superior to that of standard chemotherapy (ORR: 66.6% vs. 30.9%, OR 5.46, 95%CI 3.59 to 8.30, P<0.00001; 1-year PFS: 42.9% vs. 9.7%, OR 7.83, 95%CI 4.50 to 13.61; P<0.00001) through direct meta-analysis. In the network meta-analyses, no statistically significant differences in efficacy were found between these four TKIs with respect to all outcome measures. Trend analyses of rank probabilities revealed that the cumulative probabilities of being the most efficacious treatments were (ORR, 1-year PFS, 1-year OS, 2-year OS): erlotinib (51%, 38%, 14%, 19%), gefitinib (1%, 6%, 5%, 16%), afatinib (29%, 27%, 30%, 27%) and icotinib (19%, 29%, NA, NA), respectively. However, afatinib and erlotinib showed significant severer rash and diarrhea compared with gefitinib and icotinib.ConclusionsThe current study indicated that erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib and icotinib shared equivalent efficacy but presented different efficacy-toxicity pattern for EGFR-mutated patients. Erlotinib and afatinib revealed potentially better efficacy but significant higher toxicities compared with gefitinib and icotinib.

Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial

Afatinib-an oral irreversible ErbB family blocker-improves progression-free survival compared with pemetrexed and cisplatin for first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We compared afatinib with gemcitabine and cisplatin-a chemotherapy regimen widely used in Asia-for first-line treatment of Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. This open-label, randomised phase 3 trial was done at 36 centres in China, Thailand, and South Korea. After central testing for EGFR mutations, treatment-naive patients (stage IIIB or IV cancer [American Joint Committee on Cancer version 6], performance status 0-1) were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either oral afatinib (40 mg per day) or intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on day 1 and day 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 of a 3-week schedule for up to six cycles. Randomisation was done centrally with a random number-generating system and an interactive internet and voice-response system. Randomisation was stratified by EGFR mutation (Leu858Arg, exon 19 deletions, or other; block size three). Clinicians and patients were not masked to treatment assignment, but the independent central imaging review group were. Treatment continued until disease progression, intolerable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by independent central review (intention-to-treat population). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01121393. 910 patients were screened and 364 were randomly assigned (242 to afatinib, 122 to gemcitabine and cisplatin). Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the afatinib group (11·0 months, 95% CI 9·7-13·7) than in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group (5·6 months, 5·1-6·7; hazard ratio 0·28, 95% CI 0·20-0·39; p<0·0001). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the afatinib group were rash or acne (35 [14·6%] of 239 patients), diarrhoea (13 [5·4%]), and stomatitis or mucositis (13 [5·4%]), compared with neutropenia (30 [26·5%] of 113 patients), vomiting (22 [19·5%]), and leucopenia (17 [15·0%]) in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 15 (6·3%) patients in the afatinib group and nine (8·0%) patients in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group. First-line afatinib significantly improves progression-free survival with a tolerable and manageable safety profile in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced lung NSCLC. Afatinib should be considered as a first-line treatment option for this patient population. Boehringer Ingelheim.

Cytokeratin 19 Fragment Predicts the Efficacy of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutation

EGFR gene mutation is independently associated with a favorable response in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor -tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), regardless of sex or smoking history. Squamous cell carcinoma patients harboring EGFR mutations show a significantly worse response to EGFR-TKIs compared with adenocarcinoma patients. We hypothesized that the serum cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) is associated with the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. We retrospectively screened 160 NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations, who had received either gefitinib, or erlotinib between 1992 and 2011. Patients were screened for clinical characteristics, the efficacy of EGFR-TKI, and tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA]/CYFRA 21-1) at the initial diagnosis. Of 160 eligible patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, 77 patients with high CYFRA 21-1 level (>2 ng/ml) showed significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than the 83 patients with normal CYFRA 21-1 level (median PFS, 7.5 versus 13.3 months; p < 0.001). No significant difference in PFS was observed between the high-CEA group (>5 ng/ml) and the normal-CEA group (median PFS, 8.6 versus 11.2 months; p = 0.242). A multivariate analysis revealed that high CYFRA 21-1 level is independently associated with PFS (hazard ratio, 1.27; p = 0.002). No significant difference in overall survival was observed between the high- and the normal-CYFRA 21-1 groups (median overall survival, 24.8 versus 39.1 months; p = 0.104). Patients with a high CYFRA 21-1 level have significantly shorter PFS. CYFRA 21-1 is not a prognostic but a predictive marker of EGFR-TKI treatment in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients.

Which do patients prefer as a first-line therapy, EGFR-TKI or chemotherapy, if they have NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation? A Vignettes study (LOGIK0903).

e19016 Background: Treatment decision-making is associated with potential decisional conflict of patients. Aim of this study was to determine the preferences of advanced NSCLC patients for EGFR-TKI or chemotherapy as first-line therapy if they were in the situation of having a lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation, and to investigate the variables considered important to that preference. Methods: Three vignettes were designed to assess the patients’, the physicians’ or medical staff members’ preferences for treatment decision-making and the reasons classified into five category such as “evidence level”, “type of drug administration”, “therapeutic efficacy”, “adverse events”, and “influence to ordinary life” behind the decision. HADS, FACT-L and characteristics of participants including gender, age, and performance status (PS) are also investigated in this analysis. Results: Total 377 individuals containing 100 patients, 100 physicians, and 177 medical staff members were analyzed in this study, and 322 participants (85.4%) preferred to EGFR-TKI than chemotherapy as a first-line therapy. Preference rate of EGFR-TKI in patients was statistically significantly lower than those in physicians and medical staffs, 73%, 88% and 91%, respectively. Among the reasons we investigated, “therapeutic efficacy” was the only marginal significant reason for preference in patients (odds ratio: 3.88, p=0.06). In addition to “therapeutic efficacy”, “type of drug administration” and “influence to ordinary life” was the significant reasons for their preference in physicians (odds ratio: 11.57, 22.57 and 20.5, respectively). In pre-planned analysis, we found the difference of value between the patients and the physicians in “influence to ordinary life”. Conclusions: If the patients have an advanced lung cancer with EGFR mutation, they may prefer EGFR-TKI as a first-line therapy to chemotherapy as well as physicians and medical staff members. However the reasons of those preferences among them may be different. We should consider continuation of patients’ ordinary life when we discuss about treatment decision-making with patients. Clinical trial information: UMIN000003532.

Pemetrexed-carboplatin adjuvant chemotherapy with or without gefitinib in resected stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations: A randomized phase II study.

7519 Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) show great efficacy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. The BR.19 trial exploring the role of adjuvant gefitinib in resected early stage NSCLC (stage IB 49%, II 38%, III 13%) did not show significant progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) improvement in all patients. The efficacy of gefitinib following adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with EGFR mutation is unknown. Methods: In this open-label, phase II study, patients with resected stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC harbouring EGFR mutations (either the exon 19 deletion or L858R point mutation) were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed (500mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC=5), administered every 21 days for 4 cycles, followed with (n=30) or without (n=30) gefitinib (250mg per day) for 6 months. The primary end point was PFS. The second end point was OS. Results: From August 2008 toSeptember 2011, 60 patients (35 males and 25 females) were included in our center. Of the 60 patients (56 adenocarcinomas, 2 squamous cell carcinomas, 2 adenosquamous carcinomas), 20 patients (33.3%) had exon 19 deletion mutation, 40 (66.7%) patients had exon 21 L858R point mutation. The most common adverse event was rash (43.3%, 13 of 30) in the pemetrexed and carboplatin (PC)-gefitinib group and the addition of gefitinib to chemotherapy was well tolerated. The PFS was significantly longer among those who received PC-gefitinib than among those who received PC alone (median,39.8 months vs 27.0 months; hazard ratio [HR],0.369; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.161-0.847; P=0.014). There was no significant difference in OS between the two group(median,41.6 months vs 32.6 months,P=0.066). The rates of 2-year PFS and OS were 78.9% and 92.4% in PC-gefitinib group, and 54.2% and 77.4% in PC alone group, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of gefitinib to pemetrexed and carboplatin adjuvant therapy showed significant improvement in PFS for patients with resected stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC harbouring EGFR mutations.

Phase II Trial of Erlotinib for Japanese Patients With Previously Treated Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutations: Results of Lung Oncology Group in Kyushu (LOGiK0803)

Erlotinib has been reported to be useful for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer harboring mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene EGFR-mt. However, no prospective trial has yet assessed the utility of erlotinib in Japanese patients. Patients with EGFR-mt (exon 19/21) non-small-cell lung cancer who had previously received one to two chemotherapy regimens were enrolled in this trial. Erlotinib was initially administered at a dose of 150 mg/day orally until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities occurred. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Twenty-six patients were enrolled between February 2009 and January 2011. Objective response was observed in 14 patients (53.8%, 95% confidence interval: 33.4-73.4%), and the disease control rate reached 80.8% (95% confidence interval: 60.7-93.5%). After a median follow-up time of 17.3 months (range: 5.8-29.5 months), the median progression-free survival was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval: 7.6-11.6 months). The median survival time is yet to be determined. Major toxicities were skin disorder and liver dysfunction; most episodes were grade 2 or less, and all were tolerable. Only one patient with grade 3 skin rash discontinued the study. No patients developed interstitial lung disease, and there were no treatment-related deaths. This prospective study is the first to have investigated the usefulness of erlotinib in Japanese patients with previously treated EGFR-mt non-small-cell lung cancer. Although this trial could not meet the primary endpoint, erlotinib was well tolerated and showed clinical benefit such as promising disease control rate or progression-free survival in this population, similar to gefitinib.

Successful Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Gefitinib after Severe Erlotinib-related Hepatotoxicity

Gefitinib and erlotinib are first-generation small molecular inhibitors of EGFR tyrosine kinase activity. To the best of our knowledge, to date, two reports have stated that patients with NSCLC who develop severe hepatotoxicity secondary to gefitinib treatment can be safely switched to erlotinib. However, the reverse situation has not been reported. Here, we present the first case with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation who developed grade 3/4 hepatotoxicity after initiation of erlotinib, which resolved when therapy was changed to gefitinib. As far as we know, this is the first report showing the efficacy of gefitinib for a non-small cell lung cancer patient who developed severe hepatotoxicity while under erlotinib therapy.

Maintained Sensitivity to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer Recurring after Adjuvant Erlotinib or Gefitinib

Given the unprecedented efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in advanced EGFR-mutant lung cancer, adjuvant TKI therapy is an appealing strategy. However, there are conflicting findings regarding the potential benefit of adjuvant EGFR-TKI in patients with lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations. To better understand these results, we studied the natural history of lung cancers which recurred despite adjuvant TKI. Patients with recurrent EGFR-mutant lung cancer following adjuvant TKI were identified using an Institutional Review Board-approved mechanism. Recurrent cancer specimens were tested for resistance mutations. Sensitivity to retreatment with EGFR-TKI was evaluated. Twenty-two patients with cancers harboring an EGFR sensitizing mutation received adjuvant erlotinib or gefitinib for a median of 17 months (range 1-37 months). T790M was more common in cancers which recurred while receiving TKI than in those which recurred after stopping TKI (67% vs. 0%, P = 0.011). Fourteen patients who developed recurrence after stopping EGFR-TKI were retreated, with a median time to progression of 10 months and radiographic response seen in 8 of 11 patients with evaluable disease (73%). Recurrence of EGFR-mutant lung cancer after stopping adjuvant TKI should not preclude a trial of TKI retreatment; a phase II trial of erlotinib in this setting is underway. Studies of adjuvant EGFR-TKI will underestimate the potential survival benefit of adjuvant TKI for patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers if retreatment at recurrence is not given.