Lung Allocation Score Research Articles

Development and validation of primary graft dysfunction predictive algorithm for lung transplant candidates

PurposePrimary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the leading cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Accurate prediction of PGD risk could inform donor approaches and peri-operative care planning. We sought to develop a clinically useful, generalizable PGD prediction model to aid in transplant decision making. MethodsWe derived a predictive model in a prospective cohort study of subjects from 2012-2018, followed by a single-center external validation. We used regularized (lasso) logistic regression to evaluate the predictive ability of clinically-available PGD predictors and developed a user interface for clinical application. Using decision curve analysis (DCA), we quantified the net benefit of the model across a range of PGD risk thresholds and assessed model calibration and discrimination. ResultsThe PGD predictive model included distance from donor hospital to recipient transplant center, recipient age, predicted total lung capacity, lung allocation score (LAS), body mass index, pulmonary artery mean pressure, sex, and indication for transplant; donor age, sex, mechanism of death, and donor smoking status; and interaction terms for LAS and donor distance. The interface allows for real-time assessment of PGD risk for any donor/recipient combination. The model offers decision making net benefit in the PGD risk range of 10-75% in the derivation centers and 2-10% in the validation cohort, a range incorporating the incidence in that cohort. ConclusionWe developed a clinically useful PGD predictive algorithm across a range of PGD risk thresholds to support transplant decision making, post-transplant care, and enrich samples for PGD treatment trials.

Lung Transplantation for People Living With HIV: Promising Mid-term Outcomes.

With increasing life expectancy, patients with HIV are more commonly acquiring other chronic diseases, such as end-stage lung disease, for which transplant may be the only effective solution. Until recently, HIV infection was considered a contraindication to lung transplant (LTx). As LTx in people living with HIV (PLWH) becomes more common, there remain limited data on outcomes in this population. Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file, we identified LTx recipients with HIV by either serostatus or nucleic acid testing. A control group of confirmed HIV-negative LTx recipients was propensity score matched on age, body mass index, primary diagnosis, and year of transplant. Patient characteristics, transplant parameters, survival, and postoperative outcomes were compared. Fifty-nine LTx recipients with HIV were identified and compared with 236 HIV-negative controls. Among PLWH, cytomegalovirus status was more frequently positive (76.3% versus 58.9%, P = 0.014), and the median Lung Allocation Score at match was higher (44 versus 39, P = 0.004). PLWH were more likely to undergo dialysis postoperatively (18.6% versus 8.9%, P = 0.033), although other complication rates were similar. Fifty-three percent of LTx for PLWH occurred since 2020. One-year survival for PLWH was 91.2% versus 88.6% for controls ( P = 0.620). Three-year survival for a smaller subset was also not statistically significant (HIV versus control: 82.6% versus 77.8%, respectively, P = 0.687). There was no difference in 1-y survival for LTx recipients living with HIV compared with a matched control group, supporting this group of patients as viable candidates for LTx.

Outcomes of lung transplantation from donors with hepatitis C viremia with outpatient initiation of antiviral therapy

Transplantation of lungs from donors with active hepatitis C viremia with early initiation of antiviral therapy has been shown to have similar short- and medium-term outcomes compared to transplantation of lungs from non-viremic donors. Consideration of hepatitis C viremic lungs is particularly helpful in patients with anticipated prolonged time on the waiting list. Whether clinical outcomes remain favorable with delay of initiation of antiviral therapy to the outpatient setting or in patients with higher severity of illness is not well understood. Our transplant center considered hepatitis C nucleic acid testing positive (NAT+) donors for all waitlisted lung transplant candidates without chronic liver disease. For those transplanted with hepatitis C NAT+ lungs, we initiated anti-viral therapy in the outpatient setting and continued treatment for 12 weeks. In a retrospective single center study of 15 lung transplant recipients receiving hepatitis C NAT+ lungs and 88 recipients receiving non-viremic lungs, we tested the hypothesis that deferral of antiviral therapy after transplantation of lungs from hepatitis C NAT+ donors to the outpatient setting would result in similar 1 year survival compared to transplantation of lungs from non-viremic donors. Patients receiving hepatitis C NAT+ lungs had similar baseline characteristics, but had longer index hospital lengths of stay (24 vs. 13 days, p=0.021). Patients receiving hepatitis C NAT+ lungs had fewer episodes of acute cellular rejection in the first year. Patients receiving hepatitis C NAT+ lungs had similar one year survival to patients receiving lungs from non-viremic donors, after controlling for age and lung allocation score (p=0.638). In this small single-center study, outpatient initiation of antiviral therapy for donor-derived hepatitis C is associated with acceptable clinical outcomes and can be considered in patients with high severity of illness.

Outcomes of Recipients Aged 65 Years and Older Bridged to Lung Transplant With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplant (BTT) has been used for critically ill candidates with excellent outcomes, but data on this strategy in older recipients remain limited. We compared outcomes of no BTT, mechanical ventilation (MV)-only BTT, and ECMO BTT in recipients of greater than or equal to 65 years. Lung-only recipients of greater than or equal to 65 years in the United Network for Organ Sharing database between 2008 and 2022 were included and stratified by bridging strategy. Of the 9,936 transplants included, 226 (2.3%) were MV-only BTT and 159 (1.6%) were ECMO BTT. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation BTT recipients were more likely to have restrictive disease pathology, had higher median lung allocation score, and spent fewer days on the waitlist (all p < 0.001). Compared to no-BTT recipients, ECMO BTT recipients were more likely to be intubated or on ECMO at 72 hours posttransplant and had longer hospital lengths of stay (all p < 0.001). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation BTT recipients had increased risk of 3 years mortality compared to both no-BTT (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.48 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.14-1.91], p = 0.003) and MV-only recipients (aHR = 1.50 [95% CI: 1.08-2.07], p = 0.02). Overall, we found that ECMO BTT in older recipients is associated with inferior posttransplant outcomes compared to MV-only or no BTT, but over half of recipients remained alive at 3 years posttransplant.

Lung Allocation Score Exceptions in Persons with Cystic Fibrosis Undergoing Lung Transplant.

Rationale: Lung transplantation can extend the lives of individuals with advanced cystic fibrosis (CF). Until March 2023, the Lung Allocation Score (LAS) was used in the United States to determine transplant priority. Certain clinical events or attributes ("risk events") that are not included in the LAS (e.g., massive hemoptysis) are relatively common and prognostically important in CF and may prompt an exception request to increase priority for donor lungs. The new Lung Composite Allocation Score (CAS) also allows for exceptions based on the same principles. Objectives: To evaluate the frequency of LAS exceptions in persons with CF (PwCFs) listed for lung transplantation and assess whether LAS exceptions are associated with improved waitlist outcomes for PwCFs compared with similarly "at-risk" individuals without LAS exceptions. Methods: A merged dataset combining data from the CF Foundation Patient Registry and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (2005-2019) was used to identify PwCFs listed for lung transplantation. We compared waitlist outcomes between PwCFs with a LAS exception versus those without an exception despite having a risk event. Risk events were defined as an episode of massive hemoptysis, pneumothorax, at least three moderate/severe pulmonary exacerbations, and/or a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second by ⩾30% predicted (absolute) in the prior 12 months. Analyses were performed using competing risk regression with time to transplantation as the primary outcome and death without a transplant as a competing risk. Results: Of 3,538 listings from 3,309 candidates, 2% of listings (n = 81) had at least one exception. Candidates with an exception and those with a risk event but no exception received lung transplants more slowly than people without an exception or risk event (subdistribution hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: LAS exception cohort, 0.66 [0.52-0.85]; risk event cohort without exceptions, 0.79 [0.72-0.86]). There was no difference between those with LAS exceptions and those at risk without LAS exceptions: subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.84 (0.66-1.08). Conclusions: LAS exceptions are rare in PwCFs listed for lung transplantation. LAS exceptions resulted in a similar time to transplantation for PwCFs compared with similarly at-risk individuals. As we enter the CAS era, these LAS-based results are pertinent to improve risk stratification among PwCFs being considered for lung transplantation.

Lung Transplantation from hepatitis C+ donor lungs: Reassuring midterm outcomes

The development of modern antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has allowed for the transplantation of HCV nucleic acid amplification testing-positive (NAT+) donor lungs with acceptable short-term outcomes. We sought to evaluate trends and midterm outcomes of lung transplant recipients of HCV NAT+ donor allografts. All adults undergoing isolated lung transplantation in the United Network for Organ Sharing database from January 2016 to December 2022 were included in the study. Lung transplant recipients were stratified based on donor HCV status (HCV NAT+ vs NAT-). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences between groups. Several outcomes, including acute rejection by 1year, early (30-day and in-hospital) mortality, and both 1- and 3-year survival, were compared between matched groups. A total of 16,725 patients underwent lung transplantation during the study period, with 489 (3%) receiving HCV NAT+ donor lungs. Regions 1 (18%) and 6/8 (both 0%) had the highest and lowest proportions, respectively, of HCV NAT+ donor transplants. Utilization of HCV NAT+ donors increased throughout the study period from 2 (0.1%) in 2016 to a peak of 117 (5%) in 2019. Donors who were HCV NAT+ were younger (34 vs 36 years, p<0.001), more often female (44% vs 39%, p<0.01), and more commonly died due to drug intoxication (56% vs 15%, p<0.001). Recipients of HCV NAT+ donor lungs were similar in age (62 vs 62 years, p=0.69) and female gender (43% vs 39%, p=0.15) but had lower lung allocation scores (38 vs 41, p<0.001) compared to others. Rates of acute rejection (13% vs 17%, p=0.09), early mortality (30-day: 2% vs 1%, p=0.59, in-hospital: 3% vs 4%, p=0.38), as well as 1-year (90% vs 92%, p=0.29) and 3-year survival (69% vs 75%, p=0.13) were not significantly different between matched groups. Lung transplant recipients of HCV NAT+ donor allografts experience similar rates of acute rejection, early mortality, and 3-year survival compared to all other lung recipients. Increased use of HCV NAT+ donor allografts may help to expand the donor pool and alleviate donor shortages.

Historic Use of Race-Based Spirometry Values Lowered Transplant Priority for Black Patients

The lung allocation score (LAS) is a tool used to prioritize patients for lung transplantation. For patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), spirometry data are used for the LAS calculation. Spirometry values such as a FVC are subjected to race-specific equations that determine expected values. The effect of race-specific equations in LAS score remains unknown. Did the use of a race-based spirometry equation lead to longer waitlist times for Black patients? We performed a retrospective analysis of patients listed for lung transplantation from 2005 through 2020 using publicly available data from the United Network for Organ Sharing. We recalculated LAS scores for Black patients using White-specific equations with the available variables. The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of race-specific equations on LAS scores and time on the transplant waitlist. A total of 33,845 patients listed for lung transplantation were included in the analysis. White patients were listed at lower LAS scores, a higher proportion of White patients underwent transplantation, and White patients died on the waitlist at lower rates. When recalculating LAS scores using White-specific equations, Black patients with ILD had up to a 1.9-point higher score, which resulted in additional waitlist time. Race-specific equations led to longer wait times in Black patients listed for lung transplantation. The use of race-based equations widened already known disparities in pulmonary transplantation.

Racial Disparities in Waiting List Outcomes of Patients Listed for Lung Transplantation

BackgroundThe Lung Allocation Score, implemented in 2005, prioritized lung transplant candidates by medical urgency rather than waiting list time and was expected to improve racial disparities in transplant allocation. We evaluated whether racial disparities in lung transplant persisted after 2005. MethodsWe identified all wait-listed adult lung transplant candidates in the United States from 2005 through 2021 using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We evaluated the association between race and receipt of a transplant by using a multivariable competing risk regression model adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, Lung Allocation Score, clinical measures, and time. We evaluated interactions between race and age, sex, socioeconomic status, and Lung Allocation Score. ResultsWe identified 33,158 candidates on the lung transplant waiting list between 2005 and 2021: 27,074 White (82%), 3350 African American (10%), and 2734 Hispanic (8%). White candidates were older, had higher education levels, and had lower Lung Allocation Scores (P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, African American and Hispanic candidates were less likely to receive lung transplants than White candidates (African American: adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.91; Hispanic: adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78-0.87). Lung transplant was significantly less common among Hispanic candidates aged >65 years (P = .003) and non-White candidates from higher-poverty communities (African-American: P = .013; Hispanic: P =.0036). ConclusionsDespite implementation of the Lung Allocation Score, racial disparities persisted for wait-listed African American and Hispanic lung transplant candidates and differed by age and poverty status. Targeted interventions are needed to ensure equitable access to this life-saving intervention.

Characteristics and outcomes of lung transplants performed with ex-situ lung perfusion

Ex-situ lung perfusion (ESLP) can be used to assess and rehabilitate donor lungs, potentially expanding the donor pool. We examined the characteristics and outcomes of lung transplants performed with ESLP in the United States. Retrospective review of the United Network for Organ Sharing registry of primary adult lung transplant recipients from February 28, 2018, to June 30, 2021, was performed, comparing baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and 1-year survival of ESLP vs no ESLP lung transplants. Of 8204 lung transplants, 426 (5.2%) were performed with ESLP. ESLP donors were older, more donation after circulatory death (DCD), and had lower PaO2:FiO2 (P:F) ratios. Recipients had lower lung allocation scores. ESLP lungs traveled further, had longer preservation times, and were more likely double lung transplants. Reintubation rates, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 72hours, and hospital length of stay were greater in the ESLP group. On multivariable analysis, ESLP was not an independent predictor of 1-year survival. However, further analysis showed that DCD lungs managed on ESLP had worse 1-year survival compared to DCD lungs preserved with standard cold storage or with donation after brain death donor lungs. ESLP is used in a small percentage of lung transplants in the US and is not independently associated with 1-year survival. ESLP combined with DCD lungs, however, is associated with worse 1-year survival and warrants further investigation.

Body mass Index does not impact long-term survival of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis undergoing lung transplantation.

We investigated the impact of body mass index (BMI) on post-operative outcomes and survival of patients with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) undergoing lung transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed 222 patients with IPF that underwent lung transplant (LT) at our institution from 2005 to 2019. Recipients were divided in 4 groups: group-1 consisted of underweight patients (BMI ≤18.5 kg/m2), group-2 of normal weight patients (BMI 18.5-25 kg/m2), group-3 of over-weight patients (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2) and group-4 of obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Group-1 consisted of 13 (6%) patients, group-2 of 67 (30%) patients, group-3 of 79 (36%) patients, group-4 consisted of 63 (28%) patients. Median BMI for group-1 was 17 [interquartile range (IQR): 17, 18], for group-2 was 23 (22, 24), for group-3 was 29 (28, 29.5) and group-4 was 32 (31, 33). Patients in group-1 were significantly younger (p < 0.01). Single LT comprised the majority of operation type in group-2 to group-4 and it was significantly higher than group 1 (p < 0.01). Median follow-up time was 39 months (13-76). A total of 79 (35.5%) patients died by the end of study. Overall, five deaths occurred in group-1, 17 in group-2, 33 in group-3, and 24 in group-4. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that mortality was not statistically significant between the groups (p = 0.24). Cox-regression analysis was used to assess other possible risk factors that could influence the effect of BMI on mortality, including transplant type (single, double), lung allocation score, and age, diabetes and creatinine levels at surgery. None of these factors were shown to affect patient mortality (p > 0.05). Overall reasons for death included graft failure (24%), infection (23%), respiratory failure (14%), and malignancy (13%). Body mass index does not impact long-term survival of patients with IPF undergoing lung transplantation.

Lung Transplant Outcomes for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Are We Improving?

Following implementation of the Lung Allocation Score in 2005, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) emerged as the most common indication for lung transplant (LT) in the United States. The age and comorbidity of patients receiving LT have since increased and the indications for LT have evolved. However, limited data have analyzed more recent outcomes among the IPF population. We analyzed LTs for the primary indication of IPF using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. We performed an eras-based analysis, comparing patient characteristics, survival, and related outcomes during 2005-2009 (Era 1) and 2010-2014 (Era 2) with Chi square, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Kaplan-Meier analyses. We compared 1-year survival from 2005-2020 and survival at milestones ranging from 1-month to 5-years. We conducted two adjusted Cox proportional hazards models: 5-year survival by era and 1-year survival annually from 2010-2020. From Era 1 (n=1818) to Era 2 (n=3227), the median age of LT recipients increased from 61 to 63 years old (p<0.001). Patients in the intensive care unit prior to LT climbed from 7.7% to 12.1% (p<0.001), and patients with diabetes grew from 17.9% to 19.4% (p=0.003). Despite increased severity of illness, 5-year survival increased from 51.9% in Era 1 to 55.2% in Era 2 (p=0.02). Adjusted modeling indicated that LT during Era 2 featured a 17% hazard reduction compared to Era 1 (Hazard Ratio = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76-0.91). Survival is improving for patients undergoing LT for IPF, despite the challenges of transplantation patients with progressively higher risk profiles.

Early outcomes of lung transplantation with lung allografts from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–positive donors

ObjectiveCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be detected for extended periods of time with nucleic acid amplification test even after transmissibility becomes negligible. Lung allografts from COVID-19–positive donors have been used for transplantation in highly selected cases. This study aimed to clarify the early outcomes of lung transplantation with COVID-19–positive donors. MethodsThe Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database between April 2020 and June 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. ResultsIn the study period, 1297 COVID-19–positive donors were identified and the lungs were transplanted from 47 donors (3.6%). Of 47 donors, 44 donors were positive for COVID-19 NAT with nasopharyngeal swabs and the other 3 were positive with bronchoalveolar lavage. The COVID-19–positive lung donors were younger than the COVID-19–negative donors (28.4 ± 11.6 years vs 35.4 ± 13.6 years, P < .001). Recipients of the COVID-19–positive lungs (n = 47) were more likely have a greater lung allocation score (57.1 ± 22.9 vs 50.5 ± 19.7, P = .057) than recipients of COVID-19–negative lungs (n = 5501). The posttransplant length of hospital stay (39.8 ± 43.6 days vs 30.6 ± 34.5 days, P = .181), need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support at 72 hours after transplantation (2.6% [1/38] vs 10.4% [541/5184], P = .18), and 1-year overall survival rate (85.6% vs 87.1%, P = .63) were comparable between the 2 groups. ConclusionsCarefully selected lung allografts from COVID-19–positive donors had comparable early posttransplant outcomes to lung allografts from COVID-19–negative donors.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation: Practice patterns and patient outcomes

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly relied on to bridge patients with respiratory failure to lung transplantation despite limited evidence for its use in this setting. This study evaluated longitudinal trends in practice patterns, patient characteristics, and outcomes in patients bridged with ECMO to lung transplant. A retrospective review of all adult isolated lung transplant patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database between 2000 and 2019 was performed. Patients were classified as "ECMO" if supported with ECMO at the time of listing or transplantation and "non-ECMO" otherwise. Linear regression was used to evaluate trends in patient demographics during the study period. Trends in mortality were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards modeling, with time period as the primary covariate (2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014, or 2015-2019) and age, time on the waitlist, and underlying diagnosis as covariates. The number of patients included were 40,866, of whom 1,387 (3.4%) were classified as ECMO and 39,479 (96.6%) as no ECMO. Average age and initial Lung Allocation Score increased significantly during the study period in both cohorts, but occurred at a slower rate in the ECMO population. The hazard of death was significantly lower in more recent years (2015-2019) for both the ECMO and non-ECMO cohorts (aHR (adjusted hazards ratio) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.96 and aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.70-0.79) when compared to the early years (2000-2004) of the study period. Post-transplantation survival for patients bridged to transplantation with ECMO demonstrates ongoing improvement despite cannulation of progressively older and sicker patients.

The SHELTER Trial of Transplanting Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Lungs Into Uninfected Recipients.

This study is a single-arm trial of 10 lung transplants at a single center. Patients were included who were between 18 and 67 y of age and waitlisted for lung-only transplant. Patients were excluded who had evidence of liver disease. Primary outcome was HCV cure (sustained virologic response 12 wk after completing antiviral therapy). Recipients longitudinally reported QOL using the validated RAND-36 instrument. We also applied advanced methods to match HCV-RNA+ lung recipients to HCV-negative lung recipients in a 1:3 ratio at the same center. Between November 2018 and November 2020, 18 patients were consented and opted-in for HCV-RNA+ lung offers in the allocation system. After a median of 37 d (interquartile range [IQR], 6-373) from opt-in, 10 participants received double lung transplants. The median recipient age was 57 y (IQR, 44-67), and 7 recipients (70%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The median lung allocation score at transplant was 34.3 (IQR, 32.7-86.9). Posttransplant, 5 recipients developed primary graft dysfunction grade 3 on day 2 or 3, although none required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Nine patients received elbasvir/grazoprevir, whereas 1 patient received sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. All 10 patients were cured of HCV and survived to 1 y (versus 83% 1-y survival among matched comparators). No serious adverse events were found to be related to HCV or treatment. RAND-36 scores showed substantial improvement in physical QOL and some improvement in mental QOL. We also examined forced expiratory volume in 1 s-the most important lung function parameter after transplantation. We detected no clinically important differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 s between the HCV-RNA+ lung recipients versus matched comparators. SHELTER adds important evidence regarding the safety of transplanting HCV-RNA+ lungs into uninfected recipients and suggests QOL benefits.

Race-Specific Interpretation of Spirometry: Impact on the Lung Allocation Score.

Rationale: Interpretation of spirometry using race-specific reference equations may contribute to health disparities via underestimation of the degree of lung function impairment in Black patients. The use of race-specific equations may differentially affect patients with severe respiratory disease via the use of percentage predicted forced vital capacity (FVCpp) when included in the lung allocation score (LAS), the primary determinant of priority for lung transplantation. Objectives: To determine the impact of a race-specific versus a race-neutral approach to spirometry interpretation on the LAS among adults listed for lung transplantation in the United States. Methods: We developed a cohort from the United Network for Organ Sharing database including all White and Black adults listed for lung transplantation between January 7, 2009, and February 18, 2015. The LAS at listing was calculated for each patient under race-specific and race-neutral approaches, using the FVCpp generated from the Global Lung Function Initiative equation corresponding to each patient's race (race-specific) or from the Global Lung Function Initiative "other" (race-neutral) equation. Differences in LAS between approaches were compared by race, with positive values indicating a higher LAS under the race-neutral approach. Results: In this cohort of 8,982 patients, 90.3% were White and 9.7% were Black. The mean FVCpp was 4.4% higher versus 3.8% lower among White versus Black patients (P < 0.001) under a race-neutral compared with a race-specific approach. Compared with White patients, Black patients had a higher mean LAS under both a race-specific (41.9 vs. 43.9; P < 0.001) and a race-neutral (41.3 vs. 44.3; P < 0.001) approach. However, the mean difference in LAS under a race-neutral approach was -0.6 versus +0.6 for White versus Black patients (P < 0.001). Differences in LAS under a race-neutral approach were most pronounced for those in group B (pulmonary vascular disease) (-0.71 vs. +0.70; P < 0.001) and group D (restrictive lung disease) (-0.78 vs. +0.68; P < 0.001). Conclusions: A race-specific approach to spirometry interpretation has potential to adversely affect the care of Black patients with advanced respiratory disease. Compared with a race-neutral approach, a race-specific approach resulted in lower LASs for Black patients and higher LASs for White patients, which may have contributed to racially biased allocation of lung transplantation. The future use of race-specific equations must be carefully considered.

Frailty: A Strong Impact on Lung Transplant Outcomes?

Frailty: A Strong Impact on Lung Transplant Outcomes?

Uptake and 1-year outcomes of lung transplantation for COVID-19

ObjectiveEnd-stage lung disease from severe COVID-19 infection is an increasingly common indication for lung transplantation (LT), but there are limited data on outcomes. We evaluated 1-year COVID-19 LT outcomes. MethodsWe identified all adult US LT recipients January 2020 to October 2022 in the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients, using diagnosis codes to identify recipients transplanted for COVID-19. We used multivariable regression to compare in-hospital acute rejection, prolonged ventilator support, tracheostomy, dialysis, and 1-year mortality between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 recipients, adjusting for donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics. ResultsLT for COVID-19 increased from 0.8% to 10.7% of total LT volume during 2020 to 2021. The number of centers performing LT for COVID-19 increased from 12 to 50. Recipients transplanted for COVID-19 were younger; were more likely to be male and Hispanic; were more likely to be on a ventilator, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and dialysis pre-LT; were more likely to receive bilateral LT; and had higher lung allocation score and shorter waitlist time than other recipients (all P values < .001). COVID-19 LT had higher risk of prolonged ventilator support (adjusted odds ratio, 2.28; P < .001), tracheostomy (adjusted odds ratio 5.3; P < .001), and longer length of stay (median, 27 vs 19 days; P < .001). Risk of in-hospital acute rejection (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; P = .95) and 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; P = .12) were similar for COVID-19 LTs and LTs for other indications, even accounting for center-level differences. ConclusionsCOVID-19 LT is associated with higher risk of immediate postoperative complications but similar risk of 1-year mortality despite more severe pre-LT illness. These encouraging results support the ongoing use of LT for COVID-19–related lung disease.

Outcomes of Lung Transplant Candidates Aged ≥70 Years During the Lung Allocation Score Era

BackgroundWith the increasing age of lung transplant candidates, we studied waitlist and posttransplantation outcomes of candidates ≥70 years during the Lung Allocation Score era. MethodsAdult lung transplant candidates from 2005 to 2020 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included and stratified on the basis of age at listing into 18 to 59 years old, 60 to 69 years old, and ≥70 years old. Baseline characteristics, waitlist outcomes, and posttransplantation outcomes were assessed. ResultsA total of 37,623 candidates were included (52.3% aged 18-59 years, 40.6% aged 60-69 years, 7.1% aged ≥70 years). Candidates ≥70 years were more likely than younger candidates to receive a transplant (81.9% vs 72.7% [aged 60-69 years] vs 61.6% [aged 18-59 years]) and less likely to die or to deteriorate on the waitlist within 1 year (9.1% vs 10.1% [aged 60-69 years] vs 12.2% [aged 18-59 years]; P < .001). Donors for older recipients were more likely to be extended criteria (75.7% vs 70.1% [aged 60-69 years] vs 65.7% [aged 18-59 years]; P < .001). Recipients ≥70 years were found to have lower rates of acute rejection (6.7% vs 7.4% [aged 60-69 years] vs 9.2% [aged 18-59 years]; P < .001) and prolonged intubation (21.7% vs 27.4% [aged 60-69 years] vs 34.5% [aged 18-59 years]; P < .001). Recipients aged ≥70 years had increased 1-year (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.19 [95% CI, 1.06-1.33]; P < .001), 3-year (aHR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.18-1.39]; P < .001), and 5-year mortality (aHR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.21-1.38]; P < .001) compared with recipients aged 60 to 69 years. ConclusionsCandidates ≥70 years had favorable waitlist and perioperative outcomes despite increased use of extended criteria donors. Careful selection of candidates and postoperative surveillance may improve posttransplantation survival in this population.

Sarcoidosis lung transplantation waitlist mortality, a national registry database study.

The Lung Allocation Score (LAS) prioritises lung transplantation candidates, balancing waitlist mortality and post-transplant survival. The score groups sarcoidosis candidates based on mean pulmonary artery pressure: those with ≤30 mmHg (sarcoidosis A) are grouped with COPD and those with >30 mmHg (sarcoidosis D) with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We hypothesise that sarcoidosis candidates have a higher waitlist mortality than other candidates within their LAS grouping. This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive lung transplantation candidates from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database from May 2005 to May 2019. We included candidates aged ≥18 years diagnosed with sarcoidosis, COPD or IPF. Univariate, multivariate and survival estimate analyses were performed. We identified 385 sarcoidosis A, 642 sarcoidosis D, 7081 COPD and 10 639 IPF lung transplantation candidates. 17.3% of sarcoidosis D, 14.8% of IPF, 14.3% of sarcoidosis A and 9.8% of COPD candidates died awaiting transplant. Sarcoidosis A was an independent risk factor for waitlist mortality. Sarcoidosis A had a lower waitlist survival probability compared to COPD. Sarcoidosis D had the highest waitlist mortality. IPF candidates had lower waitlist survival probability than sarcoidosis D in the first 60 days after listing. Based on our results, the grouping of candidates with sarcoidosis in allocation systems should be revised to mitigate waitlist mortality disparity.

Lung transplant survival with past and concomitant cardiac revascularization

Coronary artery disease is common among lung transplant (LTx) candidates and has historically been viewed as a contraindication to the procedure. Survival outcomes of lung transplant recipients with concomitant coronary artery disease who had prior or perioperative revascularization remain a topic of conversation. A retrospective analysis of all single and double lung transplant patients from Feb, 2012 to Aug, 2021 at a single center was performed (n=880). Patients were split into 4 groups: (1) those who received a preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention, (2) those who received preoperative coronary artery bypass grafting, (3) those who received coronary artery bypass grafting during transplantation, and (4) those who had lung transplantation without revascularization. Groups were compared for demographics, surgical procedure, and survival outcomes using STATA Inc. A p value<0.05 was considered significant. Most patients receiving LTx were male and white. Pump type (p = 0.810), total ischemic time (p= 0.994), warm ischemic time (p = 0.479), length of stay (p =0.751), and lung allocation score (p = 0.332) were not significantly different between the four groups. The no revascularization group was younger than the other groups (p<0.01). The diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis was predominant in all groups except the no revascularization group. The pre-coronary artery bypass grafting group had a higher portion of single LTx procedures (p = 0.014). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significantly different survival rates after post-LTx between the groups (p = 0.471). Cox Regression analysis showed diagnosis significantly impacted survival rates (p 0.009). Preoperative or intraoperative revascularization did not affect survival outcomes in lung transplant patients. Selected patients with coronary artery disease may benefit when intervened during lung transplant procedures.