Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Research Articles

Predicting postoperative outcomes in lumbar spinal fusion: development of a machine learning model

BACKGROUND CONTEXTDegenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) is a prevalent spinal disorder, often requiring surgical intervention. Accurately predicting surgical outcomes is crucial to guide clinical decision-making, but this is challenging due to the multifactorial nature of postoperative results. Traditional risk assessment tools have limitations, and with the advent of machine learning, there is potential to enhance the precision and comprehensiveness of preoperative evaluations. PURPOSEWe aimed to develop a machine-learning algorithm to predict surgical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) undergoing spinal fusion surgery, only using preoperative data. STUDY DESIGNRetrospective cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLEPatients with DLS undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery. OUTCOME MEASURESThis study aimed to predict the occurrence of lower back pain (LBP) ≥4 on the numeric analogue scale (NAS) 2 years after surgery. LBP was evaluated as the average pain patients experienced at rest in the week before questioning. NAS ranges from 0 to 10, 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. METHODSWe conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively enrolled patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolistheses at our institution in the United States between January 2016 and December 2018. The initial patient characteristics to be included in the training of the model were chosen by clinical expertise and through a literature review and included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and radiologic features. The data was split into a training and validation datasets using a 60/40 split. Four different machine learning models were trained, including the modern XGBoost model, logistic regression, random-forest, and support vector machine (SVM). The models were evaluated according to the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. An AUC of 0.7 to 0.8 was considered fair, 0.8 to 0.9 good, and ≥ 0.9 excellent. Additionally, a calibration plot and the Brier score were calculated for each model. RESULTSA total of 135 patients (66% female) were included. A total of 38 (28%) patients reported LBP ≥ 4 after 2 years, representing the positive class. The XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance in the validation set with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67–0.95). The other machine learning models performed significantly worse: with an AUC of 0.52 (95% CI 0.37–0.68) for the SVM, 0.56 (95% CI 0.37–0.76) for the logistic regression and an AUC of 0.56 (95% CI 0.37–0.78) for the random forest. In the XGBoost model age, composition of the erector spinae, and severity of lumbar spinal stenosis as were identified as the most important features. CONCLUSIONSThis study represents a novel approach to predicting surgical outcomes in spinal fusion patients. The XGBoost demonstrated a better performance compared with classical models and highlighted the potential contributions of age and paraspinal musculature atrophy as significant factors. These findings have important implications for enhancing patient care through the identification of high-risk individuals and modifiable risk factors. As the incorporation of machine learning algorithms into clinical decision-making continues to gain traction in research and clinical practice, our insights reinforce this trajectory by showcasing the potential of these techniques in forecasting surgical results.

Association of abdominal aortic calcification and lower back pain in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is hypothesized to lead to ischemic pain of the lower back. This retrospective study aims to identify the relationship between AAC and lower back pain (LBP) in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Lower back pain was assessed preoperatively and 2 years after surgery using the numeric analogue scale. Abdominal aortic calcification was assessed according to the Kauppila classification and was grouped into no, moderate, and severe. A multivariable regression, adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, and smoking status, was used to assess the association between AAC and preoperative/postoperative LBP as well as change in LBP after surgery. A total of 262 patients were included in the final analysis. The multivariable logistic regression demonstrated an increased odds ratio (OR) for preoperative LBP ≥ 4 numeric analogue scale (OR = 9.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.71-40.59, P < 0.001) and postoperative LBP ≥ 4 (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 0.92-3.21, P = 0.008) in patients with severe AAC compared with patients with no AAC. Both moderate and severe AAC were associated with reduced improvement in LBP after surgery (moderate AAC: OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.85, P = 0.016; severe AAC: OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.2-0.82, P = 0.012). This study demonstrates an independent association between AAC and LBP and reduced improvement after surgery. Evaluation of AAC could play a role in patient education and might be considered part of the differential diagnosis for LBP, although further prospective studies are needed.

Examining the Role of Paraspinal Musculature in Postoperative Disability After Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Retrospective analysis of prospectively enrolled patients. To evaluate the relationship between paraspinal muscle (PM) atrophy and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improvement after spinal fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Atrophy of the PM is linked to multiple spinal conditions, sagittal malalignment, and increased postoperative complications. However, only limited evidence for the effect on patient-reported outcomes exists. Patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis undergoing decompression and fusion surgery were analyzed. Patients with missing follow-up, no imaging, or inadequate image quality were excluded. The ODI was assessed preoperatively and two years postoperatively. A cross-sectional area of the PM was measured on a T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequence at the upper endplate of L4. On the basis of the literature, a 10-point improvement cutoff was defined as the minimum clinically important difference. Patients with a baseline ODI below the minimum clinically important difference were excluded. Logistic regression was used to calculate the association between fatty infiltration (FI) of the PM and improvement in ODI, adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. A total of 133 patients were included in the final analysis, with only two lost to follow-up. The median age was 68 years (IQR 62-73). The median preoperative ODI was 23 (IQR 17-28), and 76.7% of patients showed improvement in their ODI score by at least 10 points. In the multivariable regression, FI of the erector spinae and multifidus increased the risk of not achieving clinically relevant ODI improvement ( P =0.01 and <0.001, respectively). No significant association was found for the psoas muscle ( P =0.158). This study demonstrates that FI of the erector spinae and multifidus is significantly associated with less likelihood of clinically relevant ODI improvement after decompression and fusion. Further research is needed to assess the effect of interventions.

Association Between Osteoarthritis Burden and Intervertebral Disk Degeneration in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. To assess the association between intervertebral disk degeneration and hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. The co-occurrence of hip OA and degenerative spinal pathologies was first described as the "hip-spine syndrome" and has also been observed in knee OA. It remains unclear whether both pathologies share an underlying connection beyond demographic factors. Intervertebral disk degeneration was classified by the Pfirrmann Classification and intervertebral vacuum phenomenon. Intervertebral vacuum phenomenon was classified into mild (1 point), moderate (2 points), and severe (3 points) at each level and combined into a lumbar vacuum score (0-15 points). Similarly, a lumbar Pfirrmann grade was calculated (5-25 points). Patients with previous hip or knee replacement surgery were classified as having an OA burden. We used multivariable regression to assess the association between OA and disk degeneration, adjusted for age, body mass index, and sex. A total of 246 patients (58.9% female) were included in the final analysis. Of these, 22.3% had OA burden. The multivariable linear regression showed an independent association between OA burden and lumbar vacuum (β = 2.1, P <0.001) and Pfirrmann grade (β = 2.6, P <0.001). Representing a 2.1 points higher lumbar vacuum and 2.6 points higher lumbar Pfirrmann grade after accounting for demographic differences. Our study showed that OA burden was independently associated with the severity of the intervertebral disk degeneration of the lumbar spine. These findings give further weight to a shared pathology of OA of large joints and degenerative processes of the lumbar spine. 3.

Predictive Factors Associated with Successful Response to Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Chronic Lumbar Radicular Pain.

Percutaneous adhesiolysis (PEA) is of interest in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of PEA in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain refractory to epidural steroid injections and to determine predictive factors, including demographic, clinical, and procedural data, to provide superior treatment efficacy. One hundred and ninety-three patients were reviewed. Successful treatment outcome was described as a 50% reduction in the visual analog scale score. Among the 193 patients, 109 (56.2%) exhibited a positive treatment response at 12 months. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, no depression (OR, 3.105; 95% CI, 1.127-8.547; p = 0.028), no spondylolisthesis (OR, 2.976; 95% CI, 1.246-7.092; p = 0.014), no previous lumbar surgery (OR, 2.242; 95% CI, 1.067-4.716; p = 0.033), mild foraminal stenosis (OR, 3.460; 95% CI, 1.436-8.333; p = 0.006), no opioid use (OR, 1.782; 95% CI, 0.854-3.717; p = 0.123), and baseline pain scores (OR, 0.787; 95% CI, 0.583-1.064; p = 0.120) were the predictive factors significantly associated with unsuccessful treatment outcome. PEA is a useful treatment option for patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain refractory to epidural steroid injections. A history of lumbar surgery, spondylolisthesis, depression, and severe foraminal stenosis could be associated with a poor prognosis.

The correlation between clinical symptom and morphological parameters on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with spondylolisthesis levels L4/L5 and L5/S1.

Spondylolisthesis is one of the common causes of spinal pain. There is currently a lack of studies on the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical symptoms of patients with spondylolisthesis. This study is aimed to find the correlation between clinical symptoms of L4/L5, L5/S1 lumbar spondylolisthesis, and imaging parameters on MRI. A retrospective study on 100 patients who were diagnosed with lumbar spondylolisthesis at the L4/L5, L5/S1 levels from August 2022 to February 2023. Parameters on MRI are measured the cross-sectional area of the dural sac (DSA), the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal (SCA), the ligamentum flavum cross-sectional area (LFA), and ligamentum flavum thickness (LFT), anterior-posterior diameter (APD), sliding distance (SD) at the spondylolisthesis level. Clinical symptoms were investigated according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for grading of pain and the subjective disability was assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). There was no statistically significant difference between SD, APD, SCA, DSA, LFA, and LFT between the mild and moderate pain VAS and severe pain VAS groups. No correlation was found between VAS and SD, APD, SCA, DSA, LFA, and LFT. There is a negative correlation between ODI and APD, SCA, and DSA. The statistically significant difference in APD, SCA, and DSA indexes in the two groups with mild/moderate disability (ODI ≤40%) and the group with severe disability (ODI >40%). A higher DSA and SCA, APD are associated with lower ODI. Decreased APD, SCA, and DSA are all suggestive of decreased spinal function. However, the MRI findings did not correlate with the patient's clinical pain level.

Spine

The October 2023 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Cutting through surgical smoke: the science of cleaner air in spinal operations; Unlocking success: key factors in thoracic spine decompression and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; Deep learning algorithm for identifying cervical cord compression due to degenerative canal stenosis on radiography; Surgeon experience influences robotics learning curve for minimally invasive lumbar fusion; Decision-making algorithm for the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of L4/L5; Response to preoperative steroid injections predicts surgical outcomes in patients undergoing fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Simultaneous Single-Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery and Unilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Spondylolisthesis.

To evaluate the clinical and radiological efficacy of a combine of lateral single screw-rod and unilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (LSUP) for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in the treatment of spondylolisthesis. Sixty-two consecutive patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent minimally invasive (MIS)-TLIF with bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) or LLIF-LSUP were retrospectively studied. Segmental lordosis angle (SLA), lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), disc height (DH), slipping percentage, the cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the thecal sac, screw placement accuracy, fusion rate and foraminal height (FH) were used to evaluate radiographic changes postoperatively. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy. Patients who underwent LLIF-LSUP showed shorter operating time, less length of hospital stay and lower blood loss than MIS-TLIF. No statistical difference was found between the 2 groups in screw placement accuracy, overall complications, VAS, and ODI. Compared with MIS-TLIF-BPS, LLIF-LSUP had a significant improvement in sagittal parameters including DH, FH, LLA, and SLA. The CSA of MIS-TLIF-BPS was significantly increased than that of LLIF-LSUP. The fusion rate of LLIF-LSUP was significantly higher than that of MIS-TLIF-BPS at the follow-up of 3 months postoperatively, but there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups at the follow-up of 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months. The overall clinical outcomes and complications of LLIF-LSUP were comparable to that of MIS-TLIF-BPS in this series. Compared with MIS-TLIF-BPS, LLIF-LSUP for lumbar spondylolisthesis represents a significantly shorter operating time, hospital stay and lower blood loss, and demonstrates better radiological outcomes to maintain lumbar lordosis, and reveal an overwhelming superiority in the early fusion rate.

The Influence of Screw Positioning on Cage Subsidence in Patients with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Anterolateral Fixation.

Cage subsidence (CS) has been reported to be one of the most common complications following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). To reduce the incidence of CS and improve intervertebral fusion rates, anterolateral fixation (AF) has been gradually proposed. However, the incidence of CS in patients with oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation (OLIF-AF) is still controversial. Additionally, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal placement of screws for OLIF-AF, and the impact of screw placement on the incidence of CS has yet to be thoroughly investigated and validated. The objective of this investigation was to examine the correlation between screw placements and CS and to establish an optimized approach for implantation in OLIF-AF. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken. From October 2017 to December 2020, a total of 103 patients who received L4/5 OLIF-AF for lumbar spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis or degenerative instability in our department were followed up for more than 12 months. Demographic and radiographic data of these patients were collected. Additionally, screw placement related parameters, including trajectory and position, were measured by anterior-posterior X-ray and axial CT. Analysis was done by chi-square, independent t-test, univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression to explore the correlation between screw placements and CS. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive ability of screw placement-related parameters. A total of 103 patients were included, and CS was found in 28 (27.18%) patients. Univariable analysis was firstly performed for each parameter. Next, variables with p-value of <0.05, including bone mineral density (BMD), concave morphology, and screw placement-related parameters were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Significant predictor factors for subsidence were coronal plane angle (CPA) (OR 0.580 ± 0.208, 95% CI 1.187-2.684), implantation point (IP) (L4) (OR 5.732 ± 2.737, 95% CI 1.445-12.166), and IP (L5) (OR 7.160 ± 3.480, 95% CI 1.405-28.683). Furthermore, ROC curves showed that the predictive accuracy of CS was 88.1% for CPA, 77.6% for IP (L4) and 80.9% for IP (L5). We demonstrate that the trajectory of vertebral screws, including angle and position, was closely related to CS. Inserting screws parallel to each other and as close to the endplate as possible while keeping the cage inside the range of the superior and inferior screws are an optimal implantation strategy for OLIF-AF.

Surgical treatment of low grade lumbar spondylolisthesis

Background Data: Lumbar spondylolisthesis is a prevalent cause of lower back pain and is a focal interest of spinal surgery. A diverse set of decompression and fusion techniques are used in surgery.&#x0D; &#x0D; Purpose: To investigate the surgical and clinical outcomes patients with spondylolisthesis who received surgical intervention. &#x0D; &#x0D; Materials and Methods: Data of 25 patients (15 women; 10 men; mean age, 48.8 ± 12.4 years; range, 27–66 years) with low-grade spondylolisthesis who received surgical intervention were retrospectively analyzed. Posterolateral and posterior interbody fusion was used in 17 and 8 patients, respectively, and 19 received posterior pedicle screws and 6 received only fusion and decompression. &#x0D; Results: According to the Kirkaldy–Willis criteria, the clinical outcomes of 11 (44%), 9 (36%), 3 (12%), and 2 (8%) patients were rated excellent, good, fair, and poor, respectively, with a success rate of 80%. Furthermore, fusion was observed in 21 patients (84%). Favorable outcomes were achieved in 17 (90%) patients with pedicle screws and in 3 (50%) with only decompression and fusion (p=0.048; p0.05). Two out of three patients with revision surgery had poor clinical outcomes (p=0.091; p

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of oblique lumbar interbody fusion with anterolateral screw and rod instrumentation in osteopenia patients: a retrospective study

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) to perform in L4/5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) patients who diagnosed with osteopenia.MethodsFrom December 2018 to 2021 March, 94 patients were diagnosed with degenerative spondylolisthesis underwent OLIF and divided into two groups with different bone mineral density. Anterolateral screw and rod instrumentation was applied in two groups. The primary outcomes were VAS, JOA and ODI. The secondary outcomes included disc height (DH), cross-sectional height of the intervertebral foramina (CSH), cross-sectional area of the dural sac (CSA), lumbar lordorsis (LL), pelvic titlt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI) and sacrum slop (SS).ResultsAll patients finished at least 1 years follow-up with 21.05 ± 4.42 months in the group A and 21.09 ± 4.28 months in the group B. The clinical symptoms were evaluated by VAS, JOA and ODI and 94 patients showed good outcomes at final follow-up (P < 0.05), with significant increases in DH, CSH and CSA. In group A, DH increased from 8.54 ± 2.48 to 11.11 ± 2.63 mm, while increased from 8.60 ± 2.29 to 11.23 ± 1.88 were recorded in group B. No statistical difference was found in DH between the two groups (P > 0.05). The cage subsidence was 1.14 ± 0.83 mm in group A and 0.87 ± 1.05 mm in group B (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the adjusted parameters of spino-pelvic between two groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionOblique lumbar interbody fusion with anterolateral screw and rod instrumentation is feasible to be performed in osteopenia patients who diagnosed with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

The trend of changes in spine-pelvic sagittal parameters before and after surgery in patients with double-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis and their evaluating for surgery efficacy

To explore the trend of changes in the parameters of the spine-pelvic sagittal plane before and after surgery in patients with double-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis (LSL) and to evaluate the value of the surgical effect. A retrospective analysis of 95 double-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis patients treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion from October 2019 to October 2020 were analyzed, including 31 males and 64 females;age ranging from 41 to 63 years old, with an average of (52.10±4.35) years old;degree of lesion, 47 patients with gradeⅠand 48 patients with gradeⅡ. The surgical efficacy was evaluated according to the Oswestry dysfunction index(ODI) improvement rate at 3 months after operation. ODI improvement rate ≥50% was considered good, and <50% was considered bad. Ninety-five patients were divided into good curative effect group (74 cases) and poor curative effect group (21 cases) according to surgical curative effect. The clinical data, such as gender, age, body mass index, course of disease, degree of disease, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and comorbidities were compared between two groups were compared. The parameters of spine pelvis sagittal plane were observed before and 3 months after operation, including spine sacral angle (SSA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS). Clinical symptoms were evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) and ODI. The correlation between the changes of spine pelvis sagittal plane parameters and the changes of VAS and ODI before and after surgery were analyzed, and the value of spine pelvis sagittal plane parameters in evaluating the surgical efficacy of patients with double level lumbar spondylolisthesis at 3 months after surgery was evaluated. The courses of disease and surgical time in the group with poor efficacy were longer than those in the group with good efficacy, and the degree of lesion was higher in the group with poor efficacy (P<0.05). The SSA, TPA, LL, and SS of the group with good efficacy were higher than those of the group with poor efficacy before and 3 months after surgery, while the PT was lower than that of the group with poor efficacy (P<0.05). The changes in SSA, TPA, LL, PT, and SS before and after surgery in the group with good efficacy were greater than those in the group with poor efficacy (P<0.05). The VAS and ODI of both groups were lower at 3 months after surgery than before, and the group with good efficacy was lower(P<0.05). The changes in VAS and ODI before and after surgery in the group with good efficacy were greater than those in the group with poor efficacy (P<0.05). The changes in SSA, TPA, LL, PT, SS before and after surgery were positively correlated with the changes in VAS and ODI (P<0.05). Three months after surgery, SSA, TPA, LL, PT, and SS were used to evaluate the surgical efficacy of patients with dual level lumbar spondylolisthesis. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.868, 0.797, 0.875, 0.822, and 0.853, respectively. The combined evaluation of all indicators resulted in the highest AUC, 0.927, and the best sensitivity and specificity were 90.50% and 91.89%, respectively. The spine pelvis sagittal plane parameters SSA, TPA, LL, and SS of patients with double level lumbar spondylolisthesis before and after surgery show an upward trend;PT shows a downward trend;PI do not change significantly. And the changes of SSA, TPA, LL, SS, and PT are closely related to the patient's pain level and the improvement of lumbar function, which can be used as parameters to evaluate the surgical efficacy.

Functional &amp; Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Decompression &amp; Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Using Cage and Bone Graft Combined with Stabilization in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Introduction: Posterior decompression and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using cage and bone graft is a surgical technique for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis. This procedure aims to relieve spinal pressure and stabilize the affected vertebral segments. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of posterior decompression &amp; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using cage and bone graft combined with stabilization in lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods: This prospective observational study was carried out at NITOR, Dhaka, Bangladesh, during the period from January 2020 to December 2021. Total 15 patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were included in this study. Result: The study assessed 15 patients undergoing surgery for spondylolisthesis, primarily aged 40-49, with a mean age of 46.4 years. Gender distribution was 40% male, 60% female. Pre-operative spondylolisthesis was mostly at L4/L5 (60%) and L5/S1 (40%). Post-op data showed significant reductions in slip angle and VAS scores for back and leg pain (all P&lt;0.05). Foraminal and disc space height increased. Fusion rate was 86.66% per Hackenberg criteria. Motor deficit improved from 33.3% to 6.7% post-op. According to Macnab criteria, 73% had excellent functional outcomes and 26.66% experienced minor complications; no major complications were recorded. Conclusion: As observed from the result of this study, degenerative lumber spondylolisthesis can be treated with posterior decompression and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by using cage and bone graft with spinal stabilization. This method enhances neurological recovery, reduces pain and makes the patients able to return to work comfortably.

Incidence of lumbar spondylolysis in athletes with low back pain: A systematic evaluation and single-arm meta-analysis.

Low back pain (LBP) is a common chief complaint from athletes. Lumbar spondylolysis (LS) is a common sport injury. Severe LS is likely to cause spinal instability, resulting in lumbar spondylolisthesis or lumbar disc herniation, and even damage to the spinal nerve roots. The incidence of LS is approximately 5% in the adult population, and nearly half of young athletes with LBP are diagnosed with LS. This meta-analysis analyzed the incidence of LS in athletes with LBP. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for published case report and retrospective analyses related to the topic from the date of database creation to January 1,2023. Relevant literature was screened and information extracted, and risk of bias was assessed for included studies using the methodological index for non-randomized-studies scale. Single-arm Meta-analysis was performed using R4.04 software. Heterogeneity was quantified by Cochran Q test and Higgins I2. Funnel plots were used to visualize publication bias, and Egger test and Begg test were used to statistical tests. A total of 9 studies (835 patients) were included in this study. Meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of LS in athletes with LBP was estimated at 41.7%, [95% CI = (0.28-0.55)], but this prevalence varied considerably with the gender and age of the athletes. The estimated prevalence of LS in athletes with LBP is 41.7%, and future correlations between the prevalence of LS in adolescent athletes worldwide need to be assessed from different perspectives, including biomechanical, hormonal, anatomical, behavioral, and gender differences.

Analysis of Degenerative and Isthmic Lumbar Spondylolisthesis from the Difference of Pelvic Parameters and the Degree of Degeneration through Imaging Data.

In previous studies, many imaging analyses have been conducted to explore the changes in the intervertebral disc degeneration (DD), facet joint osteoarthritis (FJOA), L4 inclination angle (L4IA), pelvis-related parameters, lumbar lordosis (LL), and paravertebral muscle (PVM) in the occurrence and development of degenerative spinal diseases via measuring the X-ray, CT, and MRI data of clinical patients. However, few studies have quantitatively investigated the pelvic parameters and the degree of spine degeneration in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis (ILS). This study discusses the changes in the imaging parameters of DLS, ILS, and a control group; explores the correlation between different measurement parameters; and discusses their risk factors. We evaluated 164 patients with single L4-L5 grade 1 level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS group), 161 patients with single L4-L5 grade 1 level isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis (ILS group), and 164 patients with non-specific back pain (control group). The grades of DD and FJOA as well as the percentage of the fat infiltration area (%FIA) of multifidus muscle (MM) at the L4-L5 level were measured via CT and MRI. Lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), the L4 inclination angle (L4IA), and sacral slope (SS) were measured via X-ray film, and the differences among the DLS group, ILS group, and control group were analyzed. Furthermore, the risk factors related to the incidences of the DLS and ILS groups were discussed. First, the pelvis-related parameters of DLS and ILS patients were 51.91 ± 12.23 and 53.28 ± 11.12, respectively, while those of the control group were 40.13 ± 8.72 (p1 < 0.001, p2 < 0.001). Lumbar lordosis (LL) in DLS patients (39.34 ± 8.57) was significantly lower than in the control group (44.40 ± 11.79, p < 0.001). On the contrary, lumbar lordosis (LL) in the ILS group (55.16 ± 12.31) was significantly higher than in the control group (44.40 ± 11.79, p < 0.001). Secondly, the three groups of patients were characterized by significant variations in the L4 inclination angle (L4IA), disc degeneration (DD), facet joint osteoarthritis (FJOA), pelvis-related parameters, and paravertebral muscle (PVM) (p < 0.05). Finally, logistic regression suggests that the L4IA, FJOA, and PT may be risk factors for the occurrence of DLS, and the occurrence of ILS is correlated with the L4IA, FJOA, DD, PT, and LL. Compared with the control group, there are changes in pelvic parameters, the L4IA, LL, DD, FJOA, and PVM in DLS and ILS patients, and the degree is different. The parameters within the same group are related to each other, and DLS and ILS have different risk factors. The mechanical stability of the spine is affected by the parameter and angle changes, which may be of great significance for explaining the cause of spondylolisthesis, evaluating the health of the lumbar spine, and guiding the lifestyles of patients.

COMPARISON OF TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION AND POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SINGLE-LEVEL LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in managing single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis. A Randomized Controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Gomal Medical College, DI Khan, Pakistan, from December 2022 to May 2023 on 50 patients presenting with adult lumbar spondylolisthesis. In group A, 25 patients underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) utilizing two cages and pedicle fixation, while 25 patients received transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) employing a single cage and pedicle fixation, representing group B. Outcomes such as mean operative times, blood loss, back and leg pain score on VAS, and complications were assessed between both groups. The mean postoperative time, blood loss, and back pain on the VAS scale were significantly lower in the TLIF group than in the PLIF group. The TLIP group showed a lower number of complications as compared to the PLIF group. TLIF outperforms PLIF regarding functional outcomes and the rate of complications for grade I/II single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis.

The Relationship between Spondylolisthesis and Modic Changes: An MRI Study

Aim: We aimed to investigate the relationship between the presence of spondylolisthesis and Modic changes (MCs) by using lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).&#x0D; Methods: The study included 139 adult patients aged 18-65 years with lumbar spondylolisthesis detected on lumbar MRI. Demographic characteristics such as age, gender, and levels and grades of spondylolisthesis, and presence of lumbar MCs/types were recorded. The findings were compared between two groups including grade 1 and grade 2 spondylolisthesis.&#x0D; Results: Grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis groups were similar for age (p=0.787), sex (p=0.076), listhesis' level (p=0.268) and direction (p=0.280). The presences of pars spondylolysis, disc space narrowing, and MCs were significantly higher in patients with grade 2 spondylolisthesis than those with grade 1 (94.4% vs 64.1%), (97.2% vs 83.5%), and (100% vs 83.5%), respectively (all p

To Instrument or Not, That Is Still the Question: Commentary on an article by Andreas K. Andresen, MD, et al.: "Instrumented Versus Uninstrumented Posterolateral Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. A Randomized Controlled Trial".

To Instrument or Not, That Is Still the Question: Commentary on an article by Andreas K. Andresen, MD, et al.: "Instrumented Versus Uninstrumented Posterolateral Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. A Randomized Controlled Trial".

Machine learning and lumbar spondylolisthesis

While lumbar spondylolisthesis is one of the most common conditions cared for by spine surgeons, there remains limited evidence guiding its diagnosis, classification, and management. The diversity in its underlying causes, clinical manifestations, and spinal anatomical variations poses a particular challenge in making informed clinical decisions. Machine learning (ML) methods offer novel opportunities to address these challenges by leveraging data-driven approaches. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the potential applications of ML in the field of lumbar spondylolisthesis. ML is a branch of artificial intelligence that employs statistical algorithms to mimic human learning behavior. In the domain of diagnosis, ML methods have been applied to detect spondylolisthesis using medical imaging. In particular, deep learning models have shown high accuracy in detecting spondylolisthesis from X-rays and MRIs, suggesting ML's potential as a diagnostic tool. Additionally, ML can aid in distinguishing spondylolisthesis grades and subtypes. Although automatic grading remains challenging, recent advances suggest that emerging ML techniques may be effective in classifying spondylolisthesis subtypes and guiding subsequent decision-making. Already, ML has been used to predict spondylolisthesis treatment outcomes, such as functional recovery and hospital length of stay. While promising, most of these prediction studies used "shallow" ML techniques, suggesting that further gains may be realized by applying deep learning methods to larger, complex datasets. In conclusion, ML advances hold promise in spondylolisthesis diagnosis, classification, and outcome prediction. In the future, these methods may help support more personalized and effective management of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Lumbar spondylolisthesis: Generating meaningful comparative evidence for selecting approach: Registries: What are We Learning?

Controversy regarding optimal surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis continues despite multiple randomized controlled trials. To this effect a number of registries have been developed, some neurosurgery and spine specific, in an effort to examine patient- and procedure- related factors and their impact on post-operative outcomes. Registries are powerful tools in understanding trends in surgery as well as the safety profile and efficacy of procedures for lumbar spondylolisthesis. This chapter reviews three major registries, NIS, NSQIP, and QOD, and their merits.