Lumbar Spine Fractures Research Articles

Thoracolumbar Fracture

Background: Fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are increasingly common. Although it is known that such fractures may elevate the risk of near-term morbidity, the natural history of patients who sustain such injuries remains poorly described. We sought to characterize the natural history of patients treated for thoracolumbar fractures and to understand clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with survival. Methods: Patients treated for acute thoracic or lumbar spine fractures within a large academic health-care network between 2015 and 2021 were identified. Clinical, radiographic, and mortality data were obtained from medical records and administrative charts. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with survival, while adjusting for confounders. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The study included 717 patients (median age, 66 years; 59.8% male; 69% non-Hispanic White). The mortality rate was 7.0% (n = 50), 16.2% (n = 116), and 20.4% (n = 146) at 3, 12, and 24 months following injury, respectively. In adjusted analysis, patients who died within the first year following injury were more likely to be older (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.05) and male (OR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.05 to 2.69). A higher Injury Severity Score, lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index at presentation were also influential factors. The final model explained 81% (95% CI = 81% to 83%) of the variation in survival. Conclusions: We identified a previously underappreciated fact: thoracolumbar fractures are associated with a mortality risk comparable with that of hip fractures. The risk of mortality is greatest in elderly patients and those with multiple comorbidities. The results of our model can be used in patient and family counseling, informed decision-making, and resource allocation to mitigate the potential risk of near-term mortality in high-risk individuals. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fractures in the Transgender Population: A Retrospective Study

Introduction. While data on the bone health of transgender individuals exist, less is known about related fractures. The authors aimed to compare the anatomic locations of and impact of co-morbidities on fractures between transgender and cisgender populations at a single institution. Methods. The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with fractures at a single institution between January 2020 and January 2021. Demographics, fracture locations, and comorbidities were identified and compared between cisgender and transgender individuals. Statistical analyses included χ2 or Fisher exact tests for proportions and independent t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous measures. Results. Transgender patients, compared to cisgender patients, were younger (W=258823, p<0.001) and had a higher incidence of shoulder/upper arm fractures (10/26 [38%] vs 1,847/12,463 [15%], p=0.003) but no lumbar spine fractures. There were no other significant differences in fracture locations. The transgender group had a higher prevalence of depression (14/26 [54%] vs 2,696/12,463 [22%], p<0.001), while hypertension was more common in the cisgender population (6,211/12,463 [50%] vs 5/26 [19%], p=0.003). While most fractures in the transgender group were not due to high-energy trauma, none of the individuals had a history of bone mineral density disorders. Conclusions. Our findings show that there were no significant differences in fracture locations between transgender and cisgender patients, except at one site. Larger studies, including longitudinal prospective studies, are needed to better understand bone health and fracture risk among transgender patients, particularly regarding changes over time with gender-affirming treatment.

INVOLVEMENT OF REGION OF SPINE AND TYPE OF FRACTURES WITH RESPECTIVE MODE OF TRAUMA

Spinal injuries are complex and often result from traumatic events such as falls, road traffic accidents, and impacts from heavy objects. Proper assessment of the injured spinal region, classification of the injury type, and evaluation of neurological impairment are critical for determining prognosis and guiding management. Objective: This study aims to assess the correlation between spinal regions involved and the mode of trauma, while also comparing the severity and prognosis of spinal injuries using the AO Spine Trauma Classification, Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification (SLICS), Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS), and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading systems. Methods: After the ethical approval from the institutional review board, this cross-sectional was conducted at Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Institute of Trauma (SMBBIT), Karachi from 1st June 2022 to 31st December 2023 . Through non-probability consecutive sampling 100 patients aged 15-60 years, both gender, who had a spinal injury due to any sort of trauma (RTA, fall, or impact by an object, etc) were included in the present study. Results: The most common cause of spinal trauma was falls from height, accounting for 59% of cases, followed by road traffic accidents (22%), falls from heavy objects (16%), and assaults (3%) (Table 1). Lumbar spine fractures were the most prevalent, occurring in 41% of participants, followed by thoracic fractures (34%) and cervical fractures (25%). In terms of fracture classification, the AO-spine system identified 51% of subaxial cervical spine fractures as Type A, while thoracolumbar spine fractures were predominantly Type B (58%).SLICS classification revealed that 70% of fractures were compressions, and 51% of patients had nerve root injurie. The ASIA scale revealed 12% of patients had complete motor and sensory loss (Grade A), while 30% retained normal function (Grade E). Conclusion: This study supports the earlier works where spinal injuries are complex trauma and require more elaborate assessment and classification systems for patient management.

Effects of Lumbar Spine Vertebral Fractures on Trabecular Bone Score (TBS): The Manitoba BMD Registry

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a BMD-independent risk factor for fracture. During BMD reporting, it is standard practice to exclude lumbar vertebral levels affected by structural artifact. It is uncertain whether TBS is affected by lumbar spine fractures. The current study examined the effect of lumbar spine compression fractures on TBS measurements. We identified 656 individuals with vertebral fractures (mean age 75.8 ± 7.9 years, 90.9% female) who had lumbar spine DXA, TBS measurements from L1-L4 and vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) for identifying vertebral fractures. There were 272 cases with lumbar spine fractures and 384 controls with only thoracic spine fractures. L1 TBS and BMD were significantly greater in those with than without lumbar fractures (p< 0.001) but did not significantly differ for other vertebral levels or for L1-L4 combined. TBS and BMD measurements were then renormalized to remove level-specific differences (denoted rTBS and rBMD). The mean difference (all fractured minus all non-fractured vertebrae) was +0.040 (+3.3%) for rTBS and +0.088 g/cm2 (+9.5%) for rBMD (both p <0.001). The largest effect was for L1 with mean difference +0.058 (+4.9%) for rTBS and +0.098 g/cm2 (+10.6%) for rBMD (both p <0.001). The mean difference between fractured and non-fractured levels for rTBS was +0.028 (+2.4%) for grade 1, +0.036 (+3.0%) for grade 2 and +0.059 (+5.0%) for grade 3 fractures; for rBMD +0.051 (+5.5%), +0.076 (+8.2%) and +0.151 (+16.4%) g/cm2, respectively. The impact of excluding lumbar vertebral levels with fracture from the L1-L4 TBS measurement overall was small (-0.011 [-1.0%]; p<0.001) and was also small for grade 3 fractures (-0.020 [-1.7%]; p<0.001). In summary, TBS is mildly increased by VFA-confirmed lumbar vertebral fractures, but the percentage effect is much smaller (less than half) than seen for BMD and minimally affects TBS measured from L1-L4. This would support the use of L1-L4 without exclusions in individuals with lumbar vertebral fractures.

The Effect of Salmon Calcitonin Adjuvant Treatment for Lumbar Spine Fracture: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

The study aimed at analyzing the therapeutic effect of salmon calcitonin on patients with lumbar spine fracture after operation. Eighty-eight cases with lumbar spine fracture who underwent percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in The Huichang People's Hospital from February 2020 to February 2023 were separated into two groups. The 44 cases in the control group were treated with calcium carbonate and Vitamin D3 tablets, on the basis, the salmon calcitonin was applied to treat the 44 cases in study group. The pain degree, bone metabolism index and matrix metalloproteinase levels were determined and compared between two groups. Lumbar function and daily living activity ability in two groups were evaluated, and adverse reactions during treatment were observed. The pain degree in study group was alleviated after treatment for 3 mo compared with the control group (p<0.05). The bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) and osteocalcin (OC) levels were increased, while beta C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type I collagen (β-CTX) levels were decreased in study group after treatment for 3 mo compared with control group (p<0.05). After treatment for 3 mo, the serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels in study group were lower than those in control group (p<0.05). Three months after treatment, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score was lower and Barthel Index (BI) score was higher in study group than those of control group (p<0.05). No severe adverse reactions were observed in both groups during treatment (p>0.05). Salmon calcitonin can relieve the pain degree, improve the levels of bone metabolism and matrix metalloproteinase, and improve the lumbar spine function and ability of daily living activity in patients with lumbar spine fracture.

Trends and epidemiology of lower trunk fractures in the super elderly population in the United States from 2011 to 2020

IntroductionFractures of the lower trunk are among the most common fractures occurring in the elderly. Super elderly individuals (i.e., those 80 years of age and older) represent a growing segment of the population and are especially prone to these fractures. The contemporary epidemiology of lower trunk fractures in the super elderly population is incompletely described in the literature. Materials and MethodsThis descriptive epidemiology study used the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) to examine the incidence and recent trends of lower trunk fractures (i.e., fractures of the hip, pelvis, and lumbar spine) occurring among super elderly individuals in the United States (US) from 2011 to 2020. Annual, overall, and age-/sex-specific incidence rates (IRs) were analyzed. Average annual percent change (AAPC) estimates were calculated to indicate the magnitude/direction of trends in annual injury rates. ResultsAn estimated N=1,226,160 super elderly patients sustained lower trunk fractures over the 10-year study period for an overall IR of 100.2 per 10,000 person-years at-risk (PYR). Hip fractures accounted for the largest percentage of cases (IR=71.7 PYR), followed by lumbar spine fractures (IR=14.7), and pelvic fractures (IR=14.3). The incidence of lower trunk fractures among super elderly females (IR=121.5 PYR) was significantly greater than that of males (IR=65.7 PYR). The incidence of lower trunk fractures among nonagenarians and centenarians was significantly higher than that of octogenarians. Accounting for population growth yielded a significantly increasing annual incidence of lower trunk fractures in super elderly patients over the study period from 86.7 PYR in 2011 to 107.2 PYR in 2020 (AAPC=2.7, p<0.001). The annual incidence of both pelvic (AAPC=5.8) and lumbar spine (AAPC=6.9) fractures increased at a significantly higher rate than that of hip fractures (AAPC=1.4). ConclusionsThis study suggests that the annual incidence of lower trunk fractures in the oldest cohort of patients in the US (80+ years of age) increased significantly during the recent decade from 2011 to 2020, with pelvic and lumbar fractures in particular becoming increasingly common. Increased incidence rates highlight the need for future research aimed at optimizing outcomes and quality of life in this frail and ever-growing segment of the population.

P314. Epidemiology of lumbar spine fractures: 20-year assessment of nationwide emergency department visit data

P314. Epidemiology of lumbar spine fractures: 20-year assessment of nationwide emergency department visit data

Development of a deep learning model for detecting lumbar vertebral fractures on CT images: An external validation

ObjectiveTo develop and externally validate a binary classification model for lumbar vertebral body fractures based on CT images using deep learning methods. MethodsThis study involved data collection from two hospitals for AI model training and external validation. In Cohort A from Hospital 1, CT images from 248 patients, comprising 1508 vertebrae, revealed that 20.9% had fractures (315 vertebrae) and 79.1% were non-fractured (1193 vertebrae). In Cohort B from Hospital 2, CT images from 148 patients, comprising 887 vertebrae, indicated that 14.8% had fractures (131 vertebrae) and 85.2% were non-fractured (756 vertebrae). The AI model for lumbar spine fractures underwent two stages: vertebral body segmentation and fracture classification. The first stage utilized a 3D V-Net convolutional deep neural network, which produced a 3D segmentation map. From this map, region of each vertebra body were extracted and then input into the second stage of the algorithm. The second stage employed a 3D ResNet convolutional deep neural network to classify each proposed region as positive (fractured) or negative (not fractured). ResultsThe AI model’s accuracy for detecting vertebral fractures in Cohort A’s training set (n = 1199), validation set (n = 157), and test set (n = 152) was 100.0 %, 96.2 %, and 97.4 %, respectively. For Cohort B (n = 148), the accuracy was 96.3 %. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) values for the training, validation, and test sets of Cohort A, as well as Cohort B, and their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were as follows: 1.000 (1.000, 1.000), 0.978 (0.944, 1.000), 0.986 (0.969, 1.000), and 0.981 (0.970, 0.992). The area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR) values were 1.000 (0.996, 1.000), 0.964 (0.927, 0.985), 0.907 (0.924, 0.984), and 0.890 (0.846, 0.971), respectively. According to the DeLong test, there was no significant difference in the AUC-ROC values between the test set of Cohort A and Cohort B, both for the overall data and for each specific vertebral location (all P>0.05). ConclusionThe developed model demonstrates promising diagnostic accuracy and applicability for detecting lumbar vertebral fractures.

Investigation of the Usefulness of Implants With Locking Mechanisms for Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis (DISH)-Induced Thoracic and Lumbar Fractures in Patients Operated in the Prone Position.

Background Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a disease that causes bone growth in the spine and musculoskeletal system, and even minor trauma can cause fractures that often require surgery. DISH-induced fractures show a tendency for bone loss when operated in the prone position, which can lead to poor fusion and implant failure; therefore, surgery in the lateral recumbent position is often recommended. However, inserting a pedicle screw (PS) in the lateral recumbent position is technically difficult. This study examined the effectiveness of the repair and fixation of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures using implants with locking mechanisms in the prone position in patients with DISH. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data from 11 patients (six males and five females; mean age: 87 years) who underwent surgery for thoracic and lumbar fractures caused by DISH between December 2023 and June 2024. Surgery was performed in the prone position using PSs or transdiscal screws (TSDs) for DISH. Ennovate® implants manufactured by B-BRAUN were used. The fixed range was three above-three below for PSs and two above-two below for TSDs. The evaluation parameters were the height/level of injury, operative time, blood loss, local kyphosis angle, anterior wall height ratio, and complications. The local kyphosis angle was measured as the angle between the upper and lower endplates of the fractured vertebrae. The ratio of the anterior wall height was evaluated. Results The average operative time was 87 min (52-172 min), and the average blood loss was 40ml (10-140 ml). The preoperative and postoperative local kyphosis angle was -8.7° and -2.4°, respectively, and the average local kyphosis angle improvement was 6.3° (0.1-14°). The preoperative and postoperative anterior wall height ratio was 132% and 110%, respectively, and the average anterior wall height ratio improvement was 22% (2-82%). No complications, such as screw deviation, implant loosening, loss of correction, or skin problems, were observed. Conclusion This study demonstrated that DISH-induced thoracic and lumbar spine fractures could be repaired and fixed using implants with locking mechanisms in the prone position. The prone position is familiar to spine surgeons and is considered safe. Additionally, screw migration may occur due to decreased bone density in the vertebral bodies with DISH; in such cases, it would be better to fix the screw without forcing it to be repositioned.

Lumbar Spine Fractures in a 14-Year-Old With Lateral Hip Pain

Lumbar Spine Fractures in a 14-Year-Old With Lateral Hip Pain

Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Fractures and Luxations in 26 Dogs and 2 Cats—Stabilization by String of Pearls Locking Plates

Abstract Objective To evaluate the use of String of Pearls (SOP) locking plates in thoracolumbar vertebral fractures and luxations in dogs and cats. Study design Retrospective case series study. Methods Clinical records of dogs and cats with thoracic and lumbar fractures treated in four veterinary surgical facilities were reviewed. Results A total of 26 dogs and 2 cats were included. Median weight of dogs at surgery was 12.1 kg (range: 2.7–37.2 kg) and the median weight of cats was 6.0 kg (range: 3.0–8.9 kg). Deep pain perception was negative in 25% (7/28) of animals at presentation, and 85.7% (6/7) regained deep pain sensation at discharge. Neurological status at discharge (p &lt; 0.05) was significantly improved compared to neurological status at presentation. Complications were observed in 28.6% (8/28) of cases. Catastrophic and major complication rates were both 3.6% (1/28). Conclusion In the reported cohort of 28 dogs and cats, SOP locking plates successfully stabilized traumatic thoracic and lumbar fractures or luxations, and the rate of complications was similar to those reported using other fixation methods.

Radiological Evaluation of Lumbar Endplate Dimensions in the Indian Population and Their Correlation With Cage Placement/Length in Diverse Lumbar Fusion Techniques.

Background Lumbar fusion techniques are vital for treating various spinal conditions by promoting vertebral fusion to alleviate pain and restore stability. Given the anatomical uniqueness of the Indian skeletal structure, this study evaluates the radiological dimensions of lumbar endplates in the Indian population and their correlation with the placement and length of interbody cages used in various lumbar fusion techniques such as oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). This study aimed to conduct radiological measurements of lumbar endplates in the Indian population and correlate them with cage placement and length in lumbar fusion techniques. Methods This prospective study was conducted at the orthopaedic ward of a tertiary care center in Western Maharashtra, India. Healthy individuals (aged >18 years, either gender) selected with a 95% confidence level using Philip Core Integrity software (Amsterdam, Netherlands) were included in the study. We excluded thosewith a history of low back pain, previous lumbar spine surgeries, fractures, tuberculosis, tumors, deformities, degenerative diseases, or lesions affecting the lumbar spine.Quantitative measurements such as oblique and sagittal diameters, apophyseal ring widths, and interbody cage lengths were calculated using multiplanar reformatting with specific imaging parameters. Results A total of 150 individuals with an average age of 39.83 ± 14.17 years, ranging from 20 to 65 years. Among the study population, 68 were males and 82 were females. Among the male study population, oblique parameters such as Angle AOB and Mid-OD (oblique diameter) show considerable variability, with Angle AOB ranging from 51.43 ± 2.40 mm (L2 inferior) to 31.59 ± 4.25 mm (L5 inferior) and Mid-OD ranging from 41.59 ± 2.59 mm (L3 superior) to 34.38 ± 2.26 mm (S1 superior). Side-sagittal dimensions vary from 32.11 ± 2.50 mm (S1 superior) to 36.48 ±3.26 mm (L3 superior), emphasizing the need for tailored surgical planning. In contrast, females in the study population exhibit distinct anatomical profiles, with Angle AOB ranging from 52.15 ± 2.43 mm (L2 inferior) to 20.45 ± 5.45 mm (S1 superior) and Mid-OD from 33.48 ± 2.15 mm (L3 inferior) to 42.45 ± 2.59 mm (L3 superior). These findings underscore gender-specific anatomical differences crucial for individualized clinical evaluation and treatment strategies. Conclusion This study comprehensively analyzes oblique, side-sagittal, transverse, and midsagittal anatomic parameters across various vertebral levels in men and women, highlighting significant anatomical variations crucial for clinical assessments and surgical interventions.

Radiologic Outcomes after Operative Management of Traumatic Spine Fractures: Stand-Alone Posterior Stabilization versus Combined Anteroposterior Approach.

Previous research emphasizes correcting deformities resulting from spine fractures by restoring sagittal alignment and vertebral height. This study aims to compare radiologic outcomes, including sagittal index (SI) and loss of vertebral body height (LVBH), between stand-alone posterior stabilization (group I) and the posteroanterior/combined approach (group II) in the operative management of traumatic thoracic or lumbar spine fractures. In this retrospective single-center study, all patients with traumatic spine fractures (T1-L5) undergoing surgical stabilization between January 1, 2015, and May 31, 2021, were included. Two spine surgeons independently assessed imaging, recording the SI and LVBH values at baseline, after each surgical intervention, and during follow-up (at least 3 months posttreatment). The mean SI and LVBH values between the assessing surgeons were utilized. Linear mixed-effects regression models, adjusted to baseline values, compared the SI and the LVBH values between the two groups. In all, 71 patients (42 men), with the median age of 38 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 28-54) and median follow-up of 4 months (IQR: 3-17), were included. Thirty-two patients were in group I and 39 patients were in group II. Forty fractures included the thoracolumbar junction (T12 or L1), 15 affected the thoracic spine, and 14 the lumbar spine. The regression model revealed superior sagittal alignment in group II, with an adjusted mean difference for SI of -4.24 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -7.13 to -1.36; p = 0.004), and enhanced restoration of vertebral body height with an adjusted mean difference for LVBH of 0.11 in the combined approach (95% CI: 0.02-0.20; p = 0.02). Nine postoperative complications occurred in the entire cohort (4 in group I and 5 in group II). Combined posteroanterior stabilization for spine fractures improves deformities by enhancing sagittal alignment and increasing vertebral body height, with acceptable morbidity compared with the stand-alone posterior approach.

Once-weekly semaglutide versus placebo in adults with increased fracture risk: a randomised, double-blinded, two-centre, phase 2 trial

Previous studies have indicated that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) may enhance bone formation and have neutral or beneficial effects on fracture risk. We evaluated the effect of the GLP-1RA semaglutide on the bone formation marker Procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) in adults with increased fracture risk. This randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted at two public hospitals in Denmark. We enrolled 64 men and women with increased fracture risk based on a T-score<-1.0at the total hip or lumbar spine and/or low-energy fracture within three years of recruitment. Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 1.0mg or placebo. The primary outcome was changes in plasma (P)-PINP from baseline to week 52. Primary and safety outcomes were assessed and evaluated for all participants. This trial is complete and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04702516. Between March 24 and December 8, 2021, 55 (86%) postmenopausal women and nine men with a mean age of 63 years (SD 5.5) and BMI of 27.5kg/m2 (SD 4.5) were enrolled. There was no effect on changes in P-PINP from baseline to week 52 between the two groups (estimated treatment difference (ETD) semaglutide versus placebo 3.8μg/L [95% CI-5.6 to 13.3]; p=0.418), and no difference in P-PINP levels between groups at week 52 (semaglutide 64.3μg/L versus placebo 62.3μg/L [95% CI-10.8 to 15.0]; p=0.749). The secondary outcomes showed higher plasma levels of bone resorption marker Collagen type I cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide (P-CTX) in the semaglutide group than in the placebo group (ETD 166.4ng/L [95% CI 25.5-307.3]; p=0.021). Compared to placebo, lumbar spine and total hip areal bone mineral densities (aBMD) were lower in the semaglutide groupafter 52 weeks ((ETD lumbar spine-0.018g/cm3 [95% CI-0.031 to-0.005]; p=0.007); ETD total hip-0.020g/cm2 ([95% CI-0.032 to-0.008]; p=0.001). Treatment differences in femoral neck aBMD were not observed ([95% CI [-0.017 to 0.006]; p=0.328). Further, body weight was lower in the semaglutide group than in the placebo group after 52 weeks (ETD-6.8kg [95% CI-8.8 to-4.7]; p<0.001). Thirty-one [97%] in the semaglutide group and 18 [56%] in the placebo group experienced at least one adverse event, including four serious events (two in each group). No episodes of hypoglycaemia or deaths were reported. In adults with increased fracture risk, semaglutide once weekly did not increase bone formation based on the bone formation marker P-PINP. The observed increase in bone resorption in the semaglutide group may be explained by the accompanying weight loss. Region of Southern Denmark, Novo Nordisk Foundation, and Gangsted Foundation. Novo Nordisk provided the investigational drug and placebo.

Surgical management of lower limb radiculopathy following acute singe-level osteoporotic vertebral fracture of lower lumbar spine in geriatric patient: a retrospective study

BackgroundRadiculopathy of the lower limb after acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) in the lower lumbar spine is uncommon in geriatric patients. Moreover, surgical intervention is generally recommended in patients who are irresponsive to conservative treatment. Determining an optimum surgical strategy is challenging considering the poor general condition of this population. Thus, herein, we established an algorithm for surgically managing this clinical scenario, hoping to provide a reference for making a surgical decision.MethodsWe retrospectively studied patients who suffered from new-onset radiculopathy of the lower limb after acute single-level OVFs in the lower lumbar spine and eventually underwent surgical intervention at our department. Information on the demographics, bone quality, AO spine classification of the vertebral fracture, pre-existing degenerative changes, including foraminal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation, and surgical intervention type was collected. Additionally, clinical outcomes, including preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and MacNab criterion for response to surgery, were evaluated.ResultsFrom September 2019 to December 2021, a total of 22 patients with a mean age of 68.59 ± 9.74 years were analyzed. The most involved vertebra was L5 (54.5%), followed by L4 (27.3%) and L3 (18.2%). Among the 22 patients, 15 (68.2%) were diagnosed with the A1 type fracture of AO classification, and among them, 11 (73.3%) were characterized by the collapse of the inferior end plate (IEP). Three patients (13.6%) suffered from A2-type fractures, whereas four patients (18.2%) suffered from A3-type fractures. Pre-existing degenerative changes were observed in 12 patients (54.5%) of the patients. A total of 16 patients (72.7%) were treated by percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP). Additionally, three patients underwent posterior instrumentation and fusion, two patients underwent a secondary endoscopic foraminoplasty, and one patient underwent a secondary radiofrequency ablation. The mean follow-up period was 17.42 ± 9.62 months. The mean VAS scores for leg and back pain and ODI decreased significantly after the surgery (P < 0.05). The total satisfaction rate at the last follow-up was 90.9% per the Macnab criterion.ConclusionPatients with OVFs in the IEP are predisposed to suffer from radiculopathy of the lower limb. PKP alone or in combination with other minimally invasive surgical strategies is safe and effective in treating stable fractures. Additionally, aggressive surgical intervention should be considered in patients with unstable fractures or severe foraminal encroachment.

433 Orientation of the Lumbar Spine During Dynamic Compression Influences Fracture Characteristics

INTRODUCTION: Characteristics of lumbar spine fractures dictate patient outcomes and clinical treatment decisions. Understanding injury biomechanics associated with different fracture types can assist injury prediction and development of safety enhancements. METHODS: Twenty human lumbar spines (T12-L5) were isolated and attached to novel whole-column experimental dynamic compressive loading apparatus. Specimens were attached to the lower platform on a drop tower and a decoupled upper platform held a mass to simulate the torso inertially loading the lumbar spine as the lower platform was decelerated at the drop tower base. Each specimen was tested at increasing deceleration magnitudes until failure. Pre-test x-rays were used for the measurements to quantify spinal orientation. Fractures were classified using post-test x-rays and CT scans. RESULTS: Fractures were classified into six categories [Wedge (AO Spine A1): n = 8, Burst (AO Spine A3/A4): n = 7, Hyperextension (AO Spine B2): n = 5]. Spines that sustained hyperextension fractures had significantly larger Cobb angles compared to spines that sustained burst fracture (p = 0.03). Spines that sustained wedge fracture had significantly larger lumbar spine angles (i.e., closer to vertical orientation) compared to spines that sustained burst (p = 0.03) and hyperextension (p = 0.02) fracture. Spines that sustained wedge fracture also had a nearly significant longer horizontal distance between the T12 centroid and the load location compared to spines that sustained burst fracture (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that orientation of the lumbar spine at the time of dynamic load application affected fracture characteristics and, therefore, post-injury spinal stability and patient outcomes. The clinical importance of these findings includes a better understanding of injury mechanisms and a recognition that a wide variety of injury outcomes (stable versus unstable; anterior versus middle versus posterior column) can result from identical loading situations with different spinal orientations.

Assessing injury risks of reclined occupants in a frontal crash preceded by braking with varied seatbelt designs using the SAFER Human Body Model

Objective This study investigated the effects of different seatbelt geometries and load-limiting levels on the kinematics and injury risks of a reclined occupant during a whole-sequence frontal crash scenario, using simulations with the Active SAFER Human Body Model (Active SHBM). Methods The Active SHBM was positioned in a reclined position (50°) on a semi-rigid seat model. A whole-sequence frontal crash scenario, an 11 m/s2 Automated Emergency Braking (AEB) phase followed by a frontal crash at 50 km/h, was simulated. The seatbelt geometry was varied using either a B-pillar-integrated (BPI) or Belt-in-seat (BIS) design. The shoulder belt load-limiting level of the BPI seatbelt was also varied to achieve either similar shoulder belt forces (BPI_Lower_LL) or comparable upper body displacements (BPI_Higher_LL) to the BIS seatbelt. Kinematics of different body regions and seatbelt forces were compared. The risks of sustaining a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), two or more fractured ribs (NFR2+), and lumbar spine vertebral fractures were also compared. Results During the pre-crash phase, head, first thoracic vertebra, and first lumbar vertebra displacements were greater with the BPI seatbelt than with the BIS, mainly due to the lack of initial contact between the torso and the seatbelt. Pelvis pre-crash displacements, however, remained consistent across seatbelt types. In the in-crash phase, variations in shoulder belt forces were directly influenced by the different load-limiting levels of the shoulder belt. The mTBI (around 20%) and NFR2+ (around 70–100%) risks were amplified with BPI seatbelts, especially at higher load-limiting force. However, the BPI design demonstrated reduced lumbar spine fracture risks (from 30% to 1%). Conclusions The BIS seatbelt appears promising, as seen with the reduced mTBI and NFR2+ risks, for ensuring the protection of reclined occupants in frontal crashes. However, additional solutions, such as lap belt load limiting, should be considered to reduce lumbar spine loading.

Levels of 91 circulating inflammatory proteins and risk of lumbar spine and pelvic fractures and peripheral ligament injuries: a two-sample mendelian randomization study

ObjectiveLumbar spine and pelvic fractures(LPF) are combined with peripheral ligament injuries(PLI), frequently. It has been reported that the site of fracture injury is usually paralleled by the secretion of inflammatory proteins. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between 91 circulating inflammatory proteins and LPF and PLI by using a Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.MethodsSingle nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with 91 circulating inflammatory proteins, as exposures were selected from a large genome-wide association study (GWAS). The genetic variant data for LPF and PLI as outcomes from the FinnGen consortium. The inverse-variance-weighted (IVW) method was utilized as the main analysis for exposures and outcomes. In addition, the final results were reinforced by the methods of MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode. The sensitivity analyses were used to validate the robustness of results and ensure the absence of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy. MR-Steiger was used to assess whether the causal direction was correct to avoid reverse causality.ResultsThis study has shown that Beta-nerve growth factor(Beta-NGF) and Interferon gamma(IFN-gamma) are both involved in the occurrence of LPF and PLI, and they are reducing the risk of occurrence(OR:0.800, 95%CI: 0.650–0.983; OR:0.723, 95%CI:0.568–0.920 and OR:0.812, 95%CI:0.703–0.937; OR:0.828, 95%CI:0.700–0.980). Similarly, Axin-1 and Sulfotransferase 1A1 (SULT-1A1) were causally associated with LPF(OR:0.687, 95%CI:0.501–0.942 and OR:1.178,95%CI:1.010–1.373). Furthermore, Interleukin-4(IL-4), Macrophage inflammatory protein 1a(MIP-1a), and STAM binding protein(STAM-BP) were causally associated with PLI(OR:1.236, 95% CI: 1.058–1.443; OR:1.107, 95% CI: 1.008–1.214 and OR:0.759, 95% CI: 0.617–0.933). The influence of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were further excluded by sensitivity analysis.ConclusionThis study provides new insights into the relationship between circulating inflammatory proteins and LPF and PLI, and may provide new clues for predicting this risk.

Association between BMI and osteoporotic fractures at different sites in Chinese women: a case-control retrospective study in Changsha

BackgroundOsteoporotic fractures are a growing problem in an aging society. The association between body mass index (BMI) and osteoporotic fractures varies by fracture site and ethnicity. Limited knowledge exists regarding this association in native Chinese, particularly utilizing local databases as reference sources.ObjectiveTo investigate the association between BMI and osteoporotic fractures at different sites in Chinese women.MethodsThree thousand ninety-eight female patients with radiographic fractures and 3098 age- and sex-matched healthy controls without fractures were included in the study. Both of them underwent assessment using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), with BMD measurements calculated using our own BMD reference database. Participants were classified into underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 24.0 kg/m2), overweight (24 ≤ BMI < 28 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2) according to the Chinese BMI classification standard.ResultsThere were 2296 (74.1%) vertebral fractures, 374 (12.1%) femoral neck fractures, and 428 (13.8%) other types of fractures in the case group. Bone mineral density (BMD) was almost lower in the fracture groups compared to the control groups (p = 0.048 to < 0.001). Compared with normal weight, underweight had a protective effect on total [odds ratio (OR) = 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49 –0.75; P< 0.001], and lumbar fractures (OR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41 – 0.67; P < 0.001), while obesity was associated with an increased risk for total (OR = 2.26; 95% CI, 1.85 – 2.76; P < 0.001), lumbar (OR = 2.17; 95% CI, 1.72 – 2.73; P < 0.001), and femoral neck fractures (OR = 4.08; 95% CI, 2.18 – 7.63; P < 0.001). Non-linear associations were observed between BMI and fractures: A J-curve for total, lumbar, and femoral neck fractures, and no statistical change for other types of fractures. Underweight was found to be a risk factor for other types of fracturess after adjusting for BMD (OR = 2.29; 95% CI, 1.09 – 4.80; P < 0.001). Osteoporosis and osteopenia were identified as risk factors for almost all sites of fracture when compared to normal bone mass.ConclusionsUnderweight has a protective effect on total and lumbar spine fractures in Chinese women, while obesity poses a risk factor for total, lumbar, and femoral neck fractures. The effect of BMI on fractures may be mainly mediated by BMD.

Return to Play Criteria After Adult Lumbar Spinal Fractures: A Review of Current Literature and Expert Recommendations.

Understanding the management of lumbar spinal fractures and return to play (RTP) criteria is an essential component of care for adult athletes. Appropriate management of lumbar spinal fractures must balance minimizing time away from physical activity while also minimizing risk of reinjury. The purpose of this review is to summarize current recommendations on lumbar spinal fracture management and RTP guidelines and to provide expert opinion on areas of discrepancy in the field. There is a paucity of high-level evidence on the management and return to play criteria for adult lumbar spine fractures in athletes. Much of the data and recommendations are based on expert opinion and studies in pediatric or osteoporotic patients, which may not be applicable to adult athletes. These data presented here may be used to aid patient-physician conversations and provide guidance on expectations for patients, coaches, and athletic trainers. In general, we recommend that patients be free of lumbar pain, neurologically intact, and have full strength and motion of the lumbar spine and lower extremities before returning to play. Adequate protective equipment is recommended to be worn at all times during practice and play.