Lumbar Disc Herniation Research Articles

External validation of the smartphone-based 6-minute walking test in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders undergoing epidural steroid injection

BackgroundThe 6-minute walking test (6WT) has previously shown to be reliable and valid outcome measure in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar disorders (DLD). A role of 6WT in conservatively treated patients undergoing epidural steroid injection (ESI) remains unclear. MethodsAbout 50 patients with DLD, scheduled for ESI were assessed by the smartphone-based 6WT and common paper-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Core Outcome Measures Index [COMI] back, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form Survey (SF-12). Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) was used to define the relationship between 6WT and PROMs. Reliability of the 6WT was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Age- and sex-adjusted objective functional impairment (OFI) z-scores were calculated for each patient. ResultsA total of 50 patients (mean age 52 years, SD 13; 25% female), including 35 patients (70%) with lumbar disc herniation and 15 patients (30%) with lumbar spinal stenosis were included. The mean 6-minute walking distance (6WD) was 454.1 m (SD 89.1); the age- and sex-adjusted mean OFI z-score was −2.1 (SD 4.0). A total of 17 (34%) patients had mild, 8 (16%) moderate, and 4 (8%) severe OFI, while 21 (42%) had 6WT results within the normal population range (no OFI). The PCCs between the 6WD and VAS back pain were r=−0.30, ODI r=−0.43, COMI back r=−0.36, and PCS-12 r=0.51 (all p<.05). The ICC of the 6WT was β=0.92. ConclusionsThis external validation in a patient cohort with DLD, which was managed conservatively, confirms the reliability and content validity of the 6WT with similar PCCs with PROMs compared to the original surgical cohort. The results confirm the 6WT as a valid and useful tool for assessing OFI in patients with DLD and a broad range of functional restrictions in an outpatient setting.

Prognostic factors for patient-reported satisfaction after percutaneous lumbar endoscopic discectomy at a minimum of two years' follow-Up.

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is increasingly used in patients with lumbar disc herniation due to its less invasive nature and faster recovery. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic factors associated with patient satisfaction index (PSI) in PELD. A retrospective study of 337 patients who underwent PELD between November 2015 and October 2020 in our department was conducted. Preoperative data of the enrolled patients were recorded. A logistic regression model was developed to explore the preoperative factors associated with postoperative PSI. After a mean follow-up of 28.7 ± 3.6 months, 310 patients were satisfied (NASS score of 1 or 2) and 27 patients were dissatisfied (NASS score of 3 or 4), resulting in a patient satisfaction rate of 91.99%. Demographic data, clinical symptom characteristics, and neurological physical examinations (including lower limb hypesthesia, muscle strength, and tendon flex) did not show any significant differences between the four groups (NASS1,2,3,4). The satisfactory group showed a higher rate of positive Lasegue sign (P = 0.010) and higher preoperative VAS (P = 0.002). The dissatisfaction group showed a higher rate of contiguous double-level disc herniation (P = 0.003). Our findings indicated that positive Lasegue sign and high preoperative VAS were prognostic factors for patient-reported satisfaction and PELD might not be the first choice for contiguous double-level disc herniation.

A retrospective comparative study of robot-assisted unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression and fusion surgery versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression and fusion surgery.

The objective of this study is to illustrate the advantages of robot-assisted unilateral biportal endoscopy in lumbar decompression fusion and internal fixation surgery. According to the different surgical methods, we divided the 26 patients into 2 groups, robot-assisted unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar interbody fusion (R-ULIF) group and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression and interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) group, with a 1:1 ratio. Gender, disease course, lesion site, fluoroscopy times, operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, screw placement success rate, fusion rate, complications rate, postoperative pain visual analog scale (VAS) (The VAS score is used only to evaluate pain in the lower back and legs.) Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (The ODI score can serve as a reference indicator for evaluating the effectiveness of treatment for patients with low back pain, and has good responsiveness in assessing patients with chronic low back pain), and MacNab (The MacNab standard is divided into 4 levels: excellent, good, fair, and poor, which can be used to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of certain spinal surgeries) standard efficacy evaluation were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. All patients successfully completed the surgery. Compared with the Endo-LIF group, the R-ULIF group had fewer fluoroscopy procedures, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter postoperative hospital stay (P < .05). The VAS scores and ODI scores of both groups significantly decreased at all-time points (P < .05). The ODI scores of the R-ULIF group were better than the Endo-LIF group at 1 month and 3 months after surgery (P = .017/P = .047), but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups before surgery and 1 week after surgery (P > .05). The efficacy was evaluated using the MacNab criteria at 6 months after surgery. The R-ULIF group has an excellent and good rate of 84.6%, while the Endo-LIF group has an excellent and good rate of 76.9% (P = 1.000). Robot-assisted unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar interbody and fusion surgery has shown short-term clinical efficacy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation combined with lumbar instability, surpassing endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Robot-assisted unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar interbody and fusion surgery has demonstrated high success rate in screw placement, minimal radiation exposure, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and thus deserves further clinical promotion.

Risk factor analysis of persistent low back pain after microdiscectomy: A retrospective study

ObjectiveMicrodiscectomy is an effective and safe treatment for patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH) that is refractory to conservative interventions. However, some patients experience persistent low back pain (PLBP) after microdiscectomy that is secondary to progressive disc degeneration and segmental instability. This study aimed to clarify the definition of PLBP and analyze its prevalence and associated risk factors. MethodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent microdiscectomy for LDH at our hospital between 2015 and 2019. We divided this cohort into patients who did (PLBP group) or did not (non-PLBP group) experience PLBP after microdiscectomy and compared their clinical, radiological, and anatomical parameters. We analyzed the relationship between PLBP post-microdiscectomy and the following variables: age, sex, disk herniation level, recurrent disk herniation, body mass index (BMI), modic changes on MRI, facet subluxation, preoperative lumbar pain, and lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV). ResultsPLBP after microdiscectomy was diagnosed in 99 (29.8 %) of the 332 patients enrolled in this study. Based on our multivariate logistic regression analysis, L5-S1 disc herniation level, recurrent disc herniation after microdiscectomy, obesity, modic changes on preoperative MRI, and facet subluxation were independent risk factors for PLBP post-microdiscectomy. Women and patients aged <50 years showed a trend of increased risk for developing PLBP after microdiscectomy; however, this trend did not reach statistical significance. ConclusionsPLBP after microdiscectomy is a frequent and understudied condition. We found that an L5-S1 disc herniation level, recurrent disc herniation, obesity, modic MRI changes, and facet subluxation were risk factors for PLBP after microdiscectomy. These results can help surgeons in developing a better understanding of lumbar microdiscectomy outcomes.

Gender-related epidemiological characteristics of cauda equina syndrome caused by disc herniation: a 10-year study in Zenica-Doboj Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Introduction: Aim of this study is to analyze gender-related epidemiological characteristics of cauda equina syndrome (CES) in Zenica-Doboj Canton in 10 years period. Methods: The study was conducted in the Zenica-Doboj Canton, and data were obtained from the time period between 2012 to 2022. The study included a total sample of 1709 patients diagnosed with disc herniation who underwent surgical decompression. In total, 48 patients developed cauda equine syndrome (CES). Results: The analysis unveiled noteworthy gender disparities, with male predominance (79.2% vs. 20.8%, p&lt;0.001) and varying employment distributions (males: 23.7% unemployed, 63.2% employed, 13.1% retired; females: 40.0% unemployed, 20.0% employed, 40.0% retired, p&lt;0.001). The calculated OR for 2012-2022 was 2.969 (95% CI: 1.576-5.593, p=xxx), signifying a substantial gender-incidence relationship for CES. CES-I incidence ranged 0.80-1.60/100,000 and CES-R ranged 0.25-0.83/100,000. Highest CES incidence was 4.17/100,000 (2015); the lowest was in 2019 with no CES-R cases reported. Male incidence peaked at 2.64/100,000 (2018), and the lowest was 1.06/100,000 (2013, 2017). For females, the highest was 1.17/100,000 (2018, 2021), with no cases reported in certain years. The affected level demonstrated gender differences, with L4/L5 prevalence in males (47.4%) and L3/L4 in females (50%, p=0.165). Conclusion: This study revealed a higher incidence of CES in males compared to females in the Zenica-Doboj Canton. The heterogenicity of data regarding CES occurring due to the lumbar disc herniation is significant. This indicates a clear need for additional research and epidemiological studies that would highlight the population of patients that have higher risk of CES onset.

Prognosis of disc herniated patients using back pain functional scale

Objective: Describe the clinical and magnetic resonance characteristics in patients with lumbar disc herniation and investigate the correlation between Back pain functional scale and clinical and magnetic resonance characteristics. Research subjects: 46 patients treated at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital from July 2023 to February 2024, with clinical symptoms suggestive of disc herniation and definitively diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging lumbar spine. Research method: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Patients were examined clinically and had an MRI scan of the lumbar spine, assessed by the 12-factor Back pain functional scale (BPFS). Results: There is a difference between BPFS scores in patients with or without clinical symptoms. Finger-to-ground distance, Valleix sign, VAS score have a strong correlation with BPFS score. BPFS score has a strong correlation with the degree of spinal stenosis and there is a statistically significant difference in BPFS score between stenosis degrees (|r| = 0.97, p&lt;0.05). Conclusion: There is a clinical correlation between BPFS and the degree of spinal stenosis on MRI in patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Impact of Lumbar Fusion Internal Fixation on Lumbar Disc Herniation in Young Patients: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND Lumbar fusion and internal fixation techniques have shown promise in treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH), yet the impact on lumbar function in young patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of lumbar fusion on lumbar function in young patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 330 patients diagnosed with LDH admitted to our hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a control group (n=264) that underwent a minimally invasive procedure with a keyhole lens, and a research group (n=66) that underwent lumbar fusion internal fixation. Clinical features and therapeutic outcomes were assessed using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) Lumbar Scores before surgery and 12 months postoperatively. Additionally, intervertebral space height, degree of vertebral spondylolisthesis (grades I, II, and III), incidence of adverse effects, and treatment efficacy were measured pre-and post-surgically. RESULTS No significant difference in ODI and JOA scores was found between the groups before surgery (P>0.05). Postoperatively, the research group had lower ODI scores, higher JOA scores, and lower intervertebral space heights compared to the control group (P=0.001). While grade 1 and 2 spondylolisthesis showed slight improvement (P>0.05), a significant difference was observed in grade III spondylolisthesis between the 2 groups (P=0.001). Additionally, the research group had a lower incidence of adverse effects (P=0.049) and higher treatment efficacy, although the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar fusion with internal fixation produced better postoperative outcomes and fewer adverse effects than minimally invasive procedures in young patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Outcomes of Surgical Management of Foraminal and Extraforaminal Lumbar Disc Herniation

Outcomes of Surgical Management of Foraminal and Extraforaminal Lumbar Disc Herniation

Prevalence, clinical predictors, and mechanisms of resorption in lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review

Prevalence, clinical predictors, and mechanisms of resorption in lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review

Clinical observation of low temperature plasma ablation combined with collagenase injection in lumbar disc herniation.

To observe the effect of low temperature plasma ablation combined with collagenase injection on lumbar disc herniation. 90 patients with lumbar disc herniation admitted to the pain department of our hospital and receiving surgical treatment from April 2021 to April 2023 were included in this retrospective study, and were divided into 2 groups according to different treatment plans. One group was treated with low-temperature plasma ablation combined with collagenase injection, and the other group was treated with low-temperature plasma ablation alone. The sample size of both groups was 80 cases. Peripheral blood was collected by fasting in the morning at 5 time points before surgery, 1, 3, 7 and 14 days after surgery, and 5 mL of whole venous blood was collected by disposable vacuum blood collection device. Serum levels of pro-inflammatory factor interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α and anti-inflammatory factor IL-4, IL-10 were detected by ELISA. VAS scores were used to evaluate postoperative low back pain. ODI and Lehmann Lumbar Function Scale were used to evaluate postoperative lumbar function. The contents of IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α and anti-inflammatory factor IL-4, IL-10 in the cryo-plasma ablation combined with collagenase injection group were significantly lower than those in the cryo-plasma ablation group alone (P < .05). The VAS score of cryo-plasma ablation combined with collagenase injection group was significantly lower than that of cryo-plasma ablation group at 1 day and 3 months after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). The ODI score of cryo-plasma ablation combined with collagenase injection group was significantly lower than that of cryo-plasma ablation group at 1 day and 3 months after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). The Lehmann score of cryo-plasma ablation combined with collagenase injection group was significantly higher than that of cryo-plasma ablation group at 1 day and 3 months after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). The overall efficacy of low-temperature plasma ablation combined with collagenase injection is better than that of low-temperature plasma ablation alone. Low temperature plasma ablation combined with collagenase injection in the treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation has less pain, faster recovery.

Single-Level Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic versus Tubular Microdiscectomy: Comparing Surgical Outcomes and Opioid Consumption

Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) microdiscectomy is an emerging minimally invasive surgery technique for treating symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. There is limited literature regarding outcomes. Here, we assess surgical outcomes and pain medication consumption for UBE vs. tubular lumbar microdiscectomy. This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing primary, single-level UBE or tubular lumbar microdiscectomy surgery at a high-volume institution between 2018 and 2023. Variables of interest included operative time, complications and reoperations, as well as postoperative opioid and nonopioid pain medication consumption from discharge to 6 months. Opioid consumption was converted to morphine milligram equivalents. Standard statistical analyses were performed for comparative analyses. One hundred two patients-48 UBE and 54 tubular-were included. Average operative time (minutes) was higher for UBE patients (133.1 UBE vs. 86.6 tubular, P<0.001), which trended downward over time but did not reach statistical significance (P=0.07). There were no differences in complication or reoperation rates. Average daily MME was lower from discharge to 2-week follow-up in the UBE group (11.1 v. 14.1, P=0.02), but were comparative thereafter. Nonopioid medication prescription was lower in the UBE cohort from discharge to 2 weeks (70.8% vs. 92.6%, P=0.01) and 2 to 6 weeks (52.1% vs. 85.2%, P<0.001), with no significant differences thereafter. UBE microdiscectomy is associated with longer operating times. Both opioid and nonopioid pain medication consumption were lower for UBE patients during the initial postoperative period, perhaps owing to the less-invasive nature of the surgery.

The Effect of Manual Therapy on Psychological Factors and Quality of Life in Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients: A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of manual therapy on pain, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods: The study included 32 LDH patients. Patients were divided into the Manual therapy group (MTG-age 39.81 ± 9.45 years) and the Exercise group (EG-age 38.31 ± 9.21 years) by sealed envelope randomization. Patients were evaluated pre-study, post-study, and after a 3-month period using the McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire (MMPQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TKS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Nottingham Health Profile (NSP). The exercise group received a total of ten sessions of stabilization exercises and sham spinal mobilization in five weeks, two sessions per week. In addition to the stabilization exercises, mobilization applications including Anterior-Posterior Lumbar Spinal Mobilization, Lumbar Spinal Rotational Mobilization, and Joint Mobilization in Lumbar Flexion Position, were applied to the manual therapy group. Results: It was found that the HADS and TKS values decreased in the MTG group compared to the pre-treatment period (p < 0.05), while there was no difference between these values in the EG group (p > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the MMPQ, PCS, and NHP values after treatment in both the MTG and EG groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: It was found that manual therapy had positive effects on psychological factors such as pain, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with LDH. Trial registration: NCT05804357 (27 March 2023) (retrospectively registered).

Effectiveness of Surgical Treatment for Far-lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Single Surgeon’s Perspective

Effectiveness of Surgical Treatment for Far-lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Single Surgeon’s Perspective

Inflammatory mechanisms as a potential cause of sciatica in lumbar disc herniation: A hypothesis

Lumbar disc herniation frequently causes low back pain and sciatica, significantly impacting patients’ quality of life. The pathogenesis of sciatica is complex, involving both mechanical compression and inflammatory processes. Recent studies have suggested a potential role of inflammatory mechanisms in the development of sciatica. We hypothesize that these inflammatory mediators contribute to the neuropathic pain experienced by patients with lumbar disc herniation. Understanding these inflammatory mechanisms may lead to novel therapeutic targets for managing sciatica in lumbar disc herniation, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Future research should focus on testing this hypothesis through scientific investigation to validate these potential new therapies.

Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy, Chemonucleolysis, Microdiscectomy, and Microendoscopic Discectomy for Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: One-year Follow-up Clinical Results and Disc Degeneration.

This study compared the 1-year clinical outcomes and disc degeneration rates after transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TF-FED), condoliase injection, open discectomy (OD), and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). In total, 279 patients with LDH were divided into four treatment groups: TF-FED, OD, MED, and condoliase injection. Outcomes were evaluated on the basis of the complication rate, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and the modified MacNab criteria. Surgical and hospital costs were assessed. Disc degeneration and endplate bone marrow edema were evaluated using magnetic resonance images. The mean postoperative JOABPEQ, VAS, or modified MacNab scores among the four groups had no significant differences. Additionally, the nerve injury or reoperation rate among the TF-FED, OD, and MED groups had no significant difference. However, the reoperation rate with condoliase injection was high because of residual disc herniation. Surgical and hospital costs were lower with condoliase injection and higher with OD and MED than those with TF-FED. With TF-FED and condoliase injection, the Pfirrmann grade progressed, and the disc height was significantly smaller than that with OD and MED. Endplate bone marrow edema was more common with condoliase injection and TF-FED. All groups had good outcomes. TF-FED and condoliase injection may reduce the burden of surgery because they can be performed under local anesthesia with little blood loss and low medical costs but tend to be associated with disc degeneration and endplate bone marrow edema. A randomized controlled study with a larger sample is needed.

Pain Characteristics of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and its Significance: A Retrospective Study.

In percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), pain occurs when the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) is exposed, removed, and decompressed. However, pain characteristics of the PLL stimulated in PELD have not been reported. A total of 932 patients underwent PELD under local anesthesia. Pain distribution and intensity were recorded on a posterior body diagram during the operation. Pain intensity was assessed by the visual analog scale scores for the back (VAS-B). The PLL specimens were collected and observed using hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemistry. Patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) at L4/5 and L5/S1 had pain foci in different regions. The mean VAS-B scores between the ventral and dorsal sides of the PLL were 6.14 ± 0.97 and 4.80 ± 1.15, respectively (P < 0.05). The distribution of nociceptive nerve fibers in the dorsal side was uniform and scattered, while those in the ventral side were mainly distributed near the outer surface of the annulus fibrosus. The positive expression of substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was higher in the ventral side of the PLL than in the dorsal side (P < 0.0001). Differences in pain distribution and intensity were observed when the PLL was incited at different spinal levels during PELD surgery.

Utilization of condoliase therapy versus surgery for lumbar disc herniation and comparison of post-treatment motor improvement

Study DesignDouble-center retrospective study. PurposeUtilization trends in interventional treatment for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) have not yet been examined. Furthermore, limited information is currently available on motor recovery with condoliase therapy. Therefore, the present study investigated utilization trends in treatment for LDH and the effects of condoliase therapy on muscle weakness. MethodsThis retrospective, double-center study involved patients with leg pain caused by LDH who received interventional treatment between September 2017 and August 2022. LDH patients were divided into two groups: an operative treatment group and condoliase therapy group. The period between September 2017 and August 2022 was divided into 5 equal parts and changes in the percentage of intervention treatment were examined. Motor recovery was also assessed in the two groups. Patients receiving condoliase therapy were divided into two groups: an effective group and non-effective group. Sex, age, the body mass index, duration of symptoms, herniation level, neurological and radiographic findings, a visual analog scale for leg pain, and the Oswestry disability index were examined in the two groups. ResultsSubjects included 226 males and 115 females with a mean age of 49.2 years, mean BMI of 22.8, and mean duration of symptoms of 5.0 months. The utilization of condoliase therapy for LDH surpassed surgery in the third year after its introduction. In the fourth year, condoliase therapy became the main treatment for LDH. Lower limb muscle strength improved in 76 % of cases receiving condoliase therapy. ConclusionsCondoliase therapy has become an intermediate treatment before surgery in our institutions. Motor recovery in patients receiving condoliase therapy was not inferior to that after surgery; however, in cases with severe muscle weakness with manual muscle test ≤3, the improvement rate was approximately 60 %. These results will be useful for clinicians when providing informed consent and selecting condoliase therapy.

Manual therapy plus sexual advice compared with manual therapy or exercise therapy alone for lumbar radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial.

The biopsychosocial approach to managing low back pain (LBP) has the potential to improve the quality of care for patients. However, LBP trials that have utilized the biopsychosocial approach to treatment have largely neglected sexual activity, which is an important social component of individuals with LBP. The objectives of the study are to determine the effects of manual therapy plus sexual advice (MT+SA) compared with manual therapy (MT) or exercise therapy (ET) alone in the management of individuals with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy (DHR) and to determine the best sexual positions for these individuals. This was a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Fifty-four participants diagnosed as having chronic DHR (>3 months) were randomly allocated into three groups with 18 participants each in the MT+SA, MT and ET groups. The participants in the MT+SA group received manual therapy (including Dowling's progressive inhibition of neuromuscular structures and Mulligan's spinal mobilization with leg movement) plus sexual advice, those in the MT group received manual therapy only and those in the ET group received exercise therapy only. Each group received treatment for 12 weeks and then followed up for additional 40 weeks. The primary outcomes were pain, activity limitation, sexual disability and kinesiophobia at 12 weeks post-randomization. The MT+SA group improved significantly better than the MT or ET group in all outcomes (except for nerve function), and at all timelines (6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization). These improvements were also clinically meaningful for back pain, leg pain, medication intake, and functional mobility at 6 and 12 weeks post-randomization and for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization (p<0.05). On the other hand, many preferred sexual positions for individuals with DHR emerged, with "side-lying" being the most practiced sexual position and "standing" being the least practiced sexual position by females. While "lying supine" was the most practiced sexual position and "sitting on a chair" was the least practiced sexual position by males. This study found that individuals with DHR demonstrated better improvements in all outcomes when treated with MT+SA than when treated with MT or ET alone. These improvements were also clinically meaningful for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at long-term follow-up. There is also no one-size-fits-all to sexual positioning for individuals with DHR.

TÉCNICAS CIRÚRGICAS MINIMAMENTE INVASIVAS VERSUS CONVENCIONAIS NA ABORDAGEM DA RADICULOPATIA LOMBAR POR HÉRNIAS DISCAIS: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURA

Radiculopathies are defined as neurological conditions characterized by nerve root dysfunction. Among its main causes is compression due to a herniated disc. The involvement can be the target of surgical approaches whose objectives focus mainly on decompressing the root, through the removal of the herniated disc. The primary surgical technique for lumbar disc herniation is open discectomy or microdiscectomy. However, there are surgical alternatives whose technique involves partial removal of the nucleus pulposus in a minimally invasive manner. The present study is based on a systematic review of the literature, based on a collection of randomized clinical studies, selected due to greater methodological rigor, with a total inclusion of 1293 participants. Comparative analysis of the evidence suggests that non-invasive surgical techniques may not be inferior to microdiscectomies/open discectomies in terms of clinical parameters, mainly in the assessment of pain and orthopedic disability index scores. Despite longer operative times, certain surgical parameters, such as lower estimated blood loss and complication rate, probably tend to be favorable to minimally invasive discectomies. Therefore, future decisions about performing lumbar discectomy should consider, when there are robust indications, patients’ preferences for a given treatment, as well as its social and economic burden.

Effectiveness of Pulse Intravenous Infusion of Methylprednisolone on Pain in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) can cause pain in the lower back and leg, as well as numbness or weakness in the affected area. Various steroids, including methylprednisolone, are currently used for treatment. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of pulse intravenous infusion of 500 mg methylprednisolone with common non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in relieving pain and improving the clinical condition of patients with lumbar disc herniation. Methods: This clinical trial, registered under code IRCT20211116053077N1, included an experimental group (37 patients) and a control group (35 patients). Pain assessments were conducted before treatment, and at one, two, and three weeks, as well as one and six months after treatment. The control group received common painkillers (diclofenac sodium tablets 100 mg), while the experimental group received a single dose of 500 mg methylprednisolone sodium succinate (intravenous injection in 500 cc normal saline). Pain scores were analyzed using SPSS 16 and statistical tests such as ANOVA, independent t-tests, and repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Prior to intervention, the mean (SD) pain score was 8.7 (3.57) in the experimental group and 8.17 (0.66) in the control group (P &gt; 0.76). Six months after methylprednisolone injection, the mean (SD) pain score in the experimental group was 1.56 (0.83), compared to 6.48 (0.91) in the control group (P = 0.000). Analysis of variance indicated that methylprednisolone significantly reduced pain in patients with LDH (P = 0.000, F = 660.668). Conclusions: Given the effectiveness of intravenous pulse infusion of 500 mg methylprednisolone compared to common NSAIDs in relieving pain and improving clinical outcomes for patients with lumbar disc herniation, the use of this drug is recommended for pain reduction in these patients.