Lumbar Canal Stenosis Research Articles

Short-Segment Fusion vs. Isolated Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Patients with Cobb Angles Over 20 Degrees

Background ContextLumbar decompression and short-segment lumbar fusion are standard procedures for short-segment lumbar canal stenosis, even in patients with moderate Cobb angles. Adult degenerative scoliosis is diagnosed at a threshold of 10 degrees, and patients with coronal Cobb angles over 30 degrees are recommended for long fusion due to global spinal deformity. However, there is a lack of research on clinical outcomes in patients with moderate coronal deformity, such as Cobb angles between 20 and 30 degrees. PurposeThis study aims to investigate the radiographic and clinical outcome differences between isolated decompression and short-segment interbody fusion for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in patients with moderate coronal deformity. Study DesignA retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected registry Patient SamplePatients with Cobb angle exceeding 20 degrees who underwent 1- or 2- levels of lumbar surgery for lumbar canal stenosis. Patients diagnosed as spinal deformity were excluded. Outcome MeasuresPatient-reported outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), VAS back, VAS leg, Short Form 12 Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS) and Mental Component Score (SF-12 MCS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) at preoperative, 12-week postoperative, and 1-year postoperative timepoints. Preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic alignment was assessed using Cobb angle, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis and PI minus LL. MethodsA propensity score-matched analysis with the overlap weighting was utilized to investigate patient-reported outcomes at 12-week and 1-year postoperatively between the surgery groups. Spinopelvic alignments were compared between preoperative and 1-year postoperative timepoint using a linear mixed-effect model. ResultsBefore overlap weighting, the two surgery groups showed significant differences in age and diagnosis. No obvious sagittal malalignment was observed (decompression, 7.4° vs. fusion, 11.5°). After propensity score weighting, the fusion groups exhibited significantly better ODI and VAS back at the 1-year timepoint (ODI: fusion, 16.6 vs. decompression, 28.1, P=0.013; VAS back: fusion, 1.5 ± 2.1 vs. decompression, 3.7 ± 1.9, P<0.001). Radiographic assessment showed that the fusion group achieved better PI minus LL compared to decompression group (15° vs. 10°, P=0.008) ConclusionIn patients with degenerative scoliosis and a Cobb angle greater than 20 degrees, short-segment lumbar fusion surgery may result in enhanced improvement for short-segment lumbar pathology compared to isolated decompression.

Endoscopic and microsurgical decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis

Objective. To perform comparative analysis of the results of endoscopic and microsurgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.Material and Methods. Design: Retrospective monocentric intra-cohort comparison of two groups of patients. The study included 99 patients aged 51–88 years with clinically significant lumbar spinal stenosis manifested by neurogenic intermittent claudication syndrome. Endoscopic decompression was performed in 51 patients, and microsurgical decompression – in 48 patients. To objectify and standardize clinical symptoms, walking distance in meters, pain syndrome and quality of life were assessed before and after surgery using standard scales and questionnaires (VAS, ODI). On the first day after surgery, back and lower limb pain were assessed, and during the observation period back and lower limb pain, quality of life and walking distance were assessed. Functional lumbar radiography was performed to exclude instability of the spinal motion segment. Using MRI, the cross-sectional area of the dural sac at the level of stenosis was measured before and after surgery. Clinical efficacy was assessed using the MCID (Minimal Clinical Important Difference) criterion. The results of the operation were followed-up for 12 months after the operation.Results. Blood loss in the endoscopic intervention group was less than in the microsurgical group. Pain in the lumbar spine and in the lower extremities decreased, and the cross-sectional area of the dural sac increased. In the first days after surgery, patients after endoscopic decompression had less severe back and lower extremity pain than patients after microsurgical decompression due to less soft tissue trauma. Pain syndrome in back 10–12 months after surgery was without statistically significant difference between the groups. Patients after endoscopic decompression had statistically significantly better quality of life according to ODI, lesser pain in the lower extremities according to VAS and longer walking distance than those in the microsurgical decompression group. Surgical treatment in both groups turned out to be effective, which is confirmed by MCID. The time of endoscopic intervention is significantly longer than that of microsurgical intervention. The length of the incision during endoscopic decompression is shorter than that of microsurgical decompression.Conclusion. A comparative analysis of the results of endoscopic and microsurgical decompression for degenerative central lumbar stenosis showed comparable effectiveness of both methods, including an increase in the spinal canal dimension and ensuring regression of clinical symptoms. The results of the comparison do not allow making a sufficiently substantiated judgment on the advantages of one of the methods, which dictates the need for further research.

To validate and correlate radiologic grading of central and foraminal stenosis post-surgical decompression on degenerative lumbar canal stenosis

Background: Lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) is characterized as a narrowing of the canal diameter with age, which can lead to degenerative bone and soft-tissue changes. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study is to validate the radiologic grading of central and foraminal through correlation with outcome after surgical decompression in degenerative LCS. Materials and Methods: A total of 23 patients with degenerative LCS who satisfied inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study were selected and their Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain were recorded and their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was graded. Results: LCS is the reduction in the dimension of the central or lateral lumbar canal that occurs most frequently as a result of chronic degenerative changes at the lumbar motion segments. In our study, ODI has comparable improvement in all groups and it does not correlate with the severity of stenosis. However, VAS for leg pain has a greater prevalence in the shorter durations group (&lt;60 months) which had an average of 8.0. If VAS for leg pain was more preoperatively, a better outcome was seen postoperatively. Conclusion: Decompression surgery for degenerative LCS shows significant improvement in ODI and VAS for back pain and leg pain irrespective of the severity of the stenosis by MRI grading or the severity of symptoms as assessed by VAS or ODI.

Postoperative Dysesthesia Secondary to Thermal Injury Following Biportal Endoscopy for Lumbar Canal Stenosis: A Report of 3 Cases and Technical Details of Radiofrequency

Postoperative dysesthesia following lumbar spine surgery is a highly bothersome symptom in the follow-up period. Although many factors contribute to this condition, the most important one is the use of radiofrequency in endoscopic spine surgery. Nonetheless, there is widespread acceptance regarding the use of radiofrequency in endoscopic spine surgery, and the literature contains few reports related to thermal damage to nerves. We describe 3 cases of nondermatomal dysesthesia syndrome in patients who had undergone lumbar unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. All diagnostic modalities were equivocal, and no pathological lesion was identified. Therefore, we interpreted the dysesthesia as secondary to thermal damage to neural structures, resulting from the radiofrequency.

Prospective comparative analysis of three types of decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: conventional, full-endoscopic, and biportal endoscopic laminectomy

Conventional open laminectomy has long been considered one of the important surgical options for lumbar central stenosis owing to its positive outcomes. However, newer approaches have emerged as alternatives, including full-endoscopic and biportal endoscopic laminectomy. Therefore, a comparison of the outcomes that are associated with each of these surgical methods is warranted. This prospective multicenter trial, initiated in February 2019, compared the outcomes of three lumbar central stenosis surgical approaches: open laminectomy (OPEN), uniportal endoscopy (UNIPORT), and biportal endoscopy (BIPORT). Among 115 participants from seven centers, one-year follow-ups assessed laboratory, radiological, and clinical outcomes. Despite all groups showing adequate decompression and clinical improvement, the OPEN group exhibited less improvement in Visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain scores (p < 0.05) and significant postoperative increases in most laboratory markers. Furthermore, the OPEN group experienced a significant decrease in multifidus muscle cross-sectional area compared to endoscopic groups (p < 0.001). Each surgical techniques produced similar clinical outcomes and dural space expansion. However, endoscopic surgery was associated with better muscle preservation and better relief of back pain. Endoscopic surgery is a reasonable alternative to conventional laminectomy for treating lumbar central stenosis.This trial was registered on CRIS (Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0004355).

Sciatica secondary to deep venous thrombosis of the persistent sciatic vein: the first case in the literature. Illustrative case.

Sciatica usually results from lumbar nerve compression due to factors like disc herniations or lumbar canal stenosis. Despite its common causes, sciatic pain in a 52-year-old man following a coronavirus disease 2019 infection highlighted the importance of considering less common factors. Initially, minor disc protrusions were suspected as the cause of the symptoms, leading to the offer of surgery at another facility. The patient sought a second opinion, and our evaluation revealed a unique finding. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging uncovered varicose structures displacing the left sciatic nerve. Subsequent pelvic computed tomography angiography identified a remarkable finding-the lack of opacification in a left persistent sciatic vein ascending toward a left internal iliac vein, originating from a common internal iliac venous trunk-confirming a suspicion for deep venous thrombosis. These findings represented not 1, but 2, extremely rare and distinct variants in the venous anatomy. The authors promptly initiated anticoagulant therapy and tailored pain management strategies, observing progressive thrombosis resolution on follow-up imaging. This report highlights the need for comprehensive diagnostics when symptoms and imaging differ. Misdiagnosis could lead to unnecessary surgeries and potential risks for the patient. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE23652.

99. Impact of decompression location for lumbar canal stenosis in degenerative scoliosis patients with Cobb angle over 20°

99. Impact of decompression location for lumbar canal stenosis in degenerative scoliosis patients with Cobb angle over 20°

Multilevel interlaminar fenestration with soft tissue decompression in lumbar canal stenosis

Introduction: Lumbar Canal Stenosis is the narrowing of the Spinal Canal and/or the intervertebral foramina, which causes compression of the thecal sac and/or caudal roots at a single vertebral level. Stenosis may be local, segmental, or generalised; bone or soft tissue can cause it. Stenosis can involve the bony canal, dural sac or both.[9] Aim: Assessment of outcomes of multilevel fenestration with soft tissue decompression in lumbar canal stenosis. Material and method: A prospective study comprised patients with two or more lumbar canal stenosis levels. The Study eliminated patients with infective pathology or recurrent surgery on identical levels. The surgical technique of canal decompression via multilevel fenestrations was used in this study, which enables the decompression of the neural structures while preserving as much of the bony and ligamentous structures as possible. Post-op clinical measures such as motor, sensory, post-op complications, and VAS score improvement assessed study outcomes. Result: Studies showed improvement in symptoms of pain, motor power and sensory deficit, post-operative improvement in VAS score for pain, and improved quality of life in almost all the patients from day 7 to day 60 after surgery. Conclusion: The study shows that “Multilevel interlaminar fenestration with Soft Tissue Decompression in Lumbar Canal Stenosis” is a feasible, safe, and effective approach to lumbar canal stenosis and is associated with minimal complications and minimal perioperative morbidity.

Anaesthetic Management for a Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patient, Scheduled for Lumbar Spine Surgery

Background: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by dilatation and impaired contraction of left or both ventricles. Diagnostic criteria are left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% or fractional shortening less than 25%. Perioperative anesthetic management of these patients are very challenging for anesthesiologists and intensive care team. Case presentation: A 55-year-old female, presented with complaints of severe low-back ache with bilateral lower limb involvement without involvement of bladder and bowel. Severe cord compression at the L4-5 level and severe lumbar canal stenosis were detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Echocardiography showed that the left ventricle (LV) had global hypokinesia, with an ejection fraction of 25% to 30%. The planed surgical procedures were L4 lumbar laminectomy and L4-5 microdiscectomy. Conclusion: Continuous monitoring and control of hemodynamic parameters as well as central venous pressure guided fluid therapy is the cornerstone in improving outcome in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy for non-cardiac surgery.

The Role of Tranexamic Acid (TXA) In Spine Surgery for Patients with Comorbidities in Basra/Iraq

Background: Blood loss occurs frequently and remains a challenge in spinal surgery. As significant intra and postoperative hemorrhage negatively affects patient outcomes by increasing coagulopathy, postoperative hematoma, and anemia. The need for allogenic blood transfusions can lead to potential transfusion reactions and infections, in addition to increasing long-term mortality rates. Although there are many randomized control trials and meta-analysis investigating the role of tranexamic acid (TXA), we could not find any study that investigated the role of TXA in patients with medical comorbidities. Therefore, tackling the role of TXA in patients with single or multiple comorbidities is of valuable outcome to our locality as most of the patients have indeed associated comorbidities. Objectives: to investigate the role of tranexamic acid in decreasing perioperative blood loss in patients with multiple comorbidities as compared to otherwise healthy individuals. Patients and methods: A single center randomized control trial. We included patients that were about to undergo simple decompressive surgeries for lumbar canal stenosis and fixation with decompression for spondylolisthesis. Patients were randomly categorized into cases (who received TXA) and controls who received NS. Patients then were subcategorized according to comorbidities and types of surgeries. Intraoperative blood loss was calculated using the suction drain and the gauze while the post operative bleeding was calculated using the drain output. Results: There was 441.84 ml (49.6 %) decrease in intraoperative bleeding for patients who received TXA as compared to controls regardless the type of surgery and regardless the presence or absence of comorbidities. Hypertensive patients had 52.7 % reduction in intraoperative bleeding when received TXA, Diabetic patients showed 44.4 % reduction in bleeding, Obese patients showed 51.1% reduction and patients with multiple comorbidities showed 51% reduction in intraoperative bleeding while healthy individuals showed 38.9% reduction in intraoperative bleeding. Conclusion: TXA was even more effective in decreasing intraoperative bleeding in patients with multiple comorbidities as compared to healthy individuals.

Slalom technique for multilevel degenerative spinal stenosis, surgical outcome and complication rate: Review of our experience.

Lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) is a common spinal disease affecting the elderly. Primarily it is asymptomatic until there is neurogenic claudication. Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques are used to treat patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), while tubular system with alternative multilevel decompression is specifically used for those with minimal back pain and no mechanical instability on dynamic imaging. The aim of the study is to evaluate surgical outcome of Slalom procedure and complications in Middle East population. One hundred and five patients with lumbar stenosis (61 males and 44 females) underwent the procedure between 2015-2021 who were regularly followed-up using preoperative and postoperative COMI score (the core outcome measure index) at six months after index surgery. Progressive improvement in COMI score from average seven pre-op score to an average of three after six months of index surgery. The postoperative complications were dural tear (6.67%), Postoperative infection (3.81%), mechanical instability (1.9%), postoperative neuritis (8.57%) and death (1.9%).

Lumbar parafacetal cyst-spinal segmental instability is the cause and stabilization is the treatment: A clinical report of eight surgically-treated patients.

The authors report the results of "only-fixation" of the affected spinal segment without any decompression of the bones or soft tissue or manipulation of the cyst wall or contents in eight cases having lumbar parafacetal cyst (LPFC). This surgical strategy was based on the concept that LPFCs are secondary to spinal instability, has a protective or adaptive role, and is reversible following stabilization. During the period from January 2018 to January 2023, eight consecutive patients having LPFC were surgically treated. There were 5 males and 3 females, and their ages ranged from 48 to 72 years (average 63 years). Seven patients had a single cyst and one patient had multiple cysts. The patients presented with symptoms classically attributed to lumbar canal stenosis. Apart from the cyst-affected spinal segment, degenerative alterations were observed in adjoining spinal segments in six out of seven patients having a single cyst. All patients underwent "only fixation" of the unstable spinal segments without any kind of bone or soft-tissue resection and without any manipulation or handling of the cyst wall or contents. During the follow-up period that ranged from 12 to 57 months (average 29 months), all patients improved from their symptoms. The recovery was observed in the immediate postoperative period and was lasting. LPFCs are one of the several secondary alterations observed in spinal degeneration. Identification of unstable spinal segments and their fixation constitutes rational treatment of lumbar parafacetal cysts. Direct handling and resection of cysts are unnecessary.

Full endoscopic percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression and discectomy: An outcome and efficacy analysis on 606 lumbar stenosis patients.

Laminectomy has long been a "gold standard" to treat symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Minimal invasive spine surgery (MISS) is widely developed to overcome the limitations of conventional laminectomy to achieve a better outcome with minimal complications. Full endoscopic percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression (FE-PSLD) is the newest MISS technique for spinal canal decompression. We aimed to evaluate and analyze the significance of FE-PSLD in reducing pain and its association with age, duration of symptoms, stenosis level, and operative time (OT). A longitudinal cross-sectional study was conducted on 606 LSS patients who underwent FE-PSLD and enrolled from 2020 to 2022. Three-month evaluation of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the modified MacNab criteria were assessed. The significance of changes was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Spearman's correlation test was performed to evaluate the significant correlation of several variables (pre-PSLD-VAS, age, symptoms duration, OT, and level of LSS) to post-PSLD-VAS, and multiple regression analysis was conducted. The reduction of VAS was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.005) with an average pre-PSLD-VAS of 6.75 ± 0.63 and post-PSLD-VAS of 2.24 ± 1.04. Pre-PSLD-VAS, age, and stenosis level have a statistically significant correlation with post-PSLD-VAS, while the duration of the symptoms and OT have an insignificant correlation. Multiple regression showed the effect of pre-PSLD-VAS (β =0.4033, P = 0.000) and stenosis level (β =0.0951, P = 0.021) are statistically significant with a positive coefficient. FE-PSLD is an efficacious strategy with favorable outcomes for managing LSS, shown by a significant reduction of pain level with a relatively short follow-up time after the procedure. Preoperative pain level, age, and stenosis level are significantly correlated with postoperative pain level. Based on this experimental study, PSLD can be considered a good strategy for treating lumbar canal stenosis in all age groups and all LSS levels.

COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN LUMBAR CANAL STENOSIS PATIENTS

Objective: The lumbar spine, a crucial component of the musculoskeletal system, is integral for structural support and mobility. Lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), characterized by spinal canal narrowing, is a growing concern associated with degenerative changes. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has emerged as a surgical intervention for LCS, aiming to achieve decompression and stabilization. This study comprehensively assesses the radiological and functional outcomes post-TLIF in LCS patients.&#x0D; Methods: A cohort of 40 LCS patients undergoing TLIF at Indira Gandhi Medical College was studied. Fifteen were retrospectively assessed operated on before May 2016, and 25 were prospective, operated between May 2016 and May 2017. Demographic data, preoperative ASIA scores, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, facet joint arthropathy, and Bridwell Fusion Grades were analyzed. Statistical tests included mean calculations, chi-square tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests.&#x0D; Results: The study revealed a significant male predominance (57.5%) and age distribution (32 to 72 y) with a male-to-female ratio of 1.35:1 (p value 0.0049). Preoperative ASIA scores showed 50% ASIA grade D and 25% grade E. Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and facet joint arthropathy were present in 70% and 67.5% of patients, respectively. Bridwell Fusion Grade indicated 80% achieved grade 1 fusion.&#x0D; Conclusion: This study contributes valuable insights into TLIF outcomes in LCS patients, emphasizing the significance of age, gender, neurological status, and associated pathologies. Favorable fusion outcomes suggest TLIF effectively stabilizes the lumbar spine. Future research with larger cohorts could further validate these findings and refine TLIF's role in LCS management.

ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR LUMBAR CANAL STENOSIS

Objective: The lumbar spine undergoes degenerative changes with age, leading to lumbar canal stenosis (LCS). Surgical interventions, including transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), become essential when conservative measures fail. Understanding complications associated with TLIF is crucial for informed decision-making and improved patient outcomes.&#x0D; Methods: A study involving 40 LCS patients undergoing TLIF was conducted at Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla. Records were retrospectively evaluated for 15 patients (pre-May 2016) and prospectively for 25 patients (May 2016-May 2017). Surgical indications, inclusion/exclusion criteria, preoperative preparation, and TLIF procedures were outlined. Postoperative care and follow-up assessments were detailed. Statistical analysis utilized SPSS 17.0 with a significance level of 0.05.&#x0D; Results: Age and sex distribution demonstrated a significant association (p=0.0049), with a male predominance (57.5%). Occupation analysis revealed 32.5% farmers, 15% laborers, 5% drivers, and 47.5% 'others.' Neurological deficits were present in 75% of cases, while facet joint arthropathy affected 67.5% of patients. Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index indicated severe disability in 62.5% of cases.&#x0D; Conclusion: This study provides critical insights into TLIF complications for LCS, emphasizing male predominance, occupation-related considerations, and significant preoperative disability. Findings contribute to refining surgical protocols, minimizing risks, and optimizing patient safety in TLIF for LCS, essential for advancing spinal surgery standards.

Limited Improvement With Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Alone for Degenerative Scoliosis With Cobb Angle Over 20°: The Impact of Decompression Location.

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multisurgeon registry. To evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive (MI) decompression in patients with severe degenerative scoliosis (DS) and identify factors associated with poorer outcomes. MI decompression has gained widespread acceptance as a treatment option for patients with lumbar canal stenosis and DS. However, there is a lack of research regarding the clinical outcomes and the impact of MI decompression location in patients with severe DS exhibiting a Cobb angle exceeding 20°. Patients who underwent MI decompression alone were included and categorized into the DS or control groups based on Cobb angle (>20°). Decompression location was labeled as "scoliosis-related" when the decompression levels were across or between end vertebrae and "outside" when the operative levels did not include the end vertebrae. The outcomes, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were compared between the propensity score-matched groups for improvement and minimal clinical importance difference (MCID) achievement at ≥1 year postoperatively. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify factors contributing to the nonachievement of MCID in ODI of the DS group at the ≥1-year time point. A total of 253 patients (41 DS) were included in the study. Following matching for age, sex, osteoporosis status, psoas muscle area, and preoperative ODI, the DS groups exhibited a significantly lower rate of MCID achievement in ODI (DS: 45.5% vs. control 69.0%, P =0.047). The "scoliosis-related" decompression (odds ratio: 9.9, P =0.028) was an independent factor of nonachievement of MCID in ODI within the DS group. In patients with a Cobb angle >20°, lumbar decompression surgery, even in the MI approach, may result in limited improvement of disability and physical function. Caution should be exercised when determining a surgical plan, especially when decompression involves the level between or across the end vertebrae. 3.

Unprecedented journey to 650 transpedicular screws using freehand technique and intraoperative C-arm imaging with technical nuances.

Pedicle screw placement plays a crucial role in treating various cases such as fractures, scoliosis, degenerative spine issues, and kyphosis, reinforcing all three spinal columns simultaneously. While three-dimensional navigation-assisted pedicle screw placement is considered superior, the freehand technique relies on anatomical landmarks and tactile feedback, with observed low complication rates. This was a prospective single-center study conducted over a period of 3 years. It included all patients of dorsal, lumbar, and sacral spinal instability of myriad etiology. Previously operated patients and sick obtunded patients were excluded from the study. In our study, we included 102 patients including 62 (60.7%) males and 40 (39.2%) females. More than half of patients were young in the age group of 20-50 years. Our study population had a varied etiology with 43.1% of patients having vertebral column instability due to trauma. The other etiologies were spondylolisthesis and lumbar canal stenosis (39.2%), Pott's spine (11.7%), tumors (2.9%), and osteoporotic fractures (2.9%). Majority of patients (44.1%) presented with lower backache with radiculopathy. All the transpedicular screws inserted were evaluated by C-arm to assess for screw fixation. In the first year of our study, an average of 4 anteroposterior (AP) and 4 lateral C-arm X-ray shots were taken per screw placement. In the next year, an average of 3 AP and 3 lateral shots and finally in the last year of our study only 2 AP and 2 lateral C-arm X-ray shots were taken per screw placement. Out of 650 screws placed, 4 screws were identified to cause breach with maximum breaches in the lumbar spine fixation. In dorsal spine fixation, there was 1 lateral breach at D10. In lumbar spine fixation, there were 3 breaches: two medial one each at L4 and L5 and one anterior at L2 level. The various complications include wound infection, temporary and permanent neurological deficit, screw breakage, screw misplacement, cerebrospinal fluid leaks, nonunion, and spinal epidural hematoma. Our study has provided strong encouragement to persist with the freehand technique in transpedicular fixation surgeries after a certain number of cases given the minimal breaches and complications observed. There are subtle technical nuances as we increase the number of cases with less exposure of anatomical landmarks and X-rays. Success hinges on experience, adherence to technique, and thorough preoperative planning. Further research and extended follow-up periods are necessary to firmly establish this technique as the gold standard.

Interlaminar laminectomy/discectomy techniques and outcomes

ObjectiveUnilateral Biportal Endoscopic decompression via interlaminar approach is an evolving minimally invasive technique to decompress the neural structures from either due to degenerative lumbar canal stenosis or herniated disc. The current study aims to highlight technical aspects of this procedure for safe and better clinical outcomes. FindingsUnilateral Biportal Endoscopy via interlaminar approach provides an excellent magnified and illuminated surgical field to satisfactorily decompress not only ipsilateral but contralateral side also. Dural tear and epidural hematomas are known complications; however, the incidence is low. ConclusionUnilateral Biportal Endoscopic decompression via interlaminar approach can safely and effectively decompress neural elements without destabilizing spine.

GABAPENTINOIDS IN THE SYMPTOMATIC MANAGEMENT OF CANAL STENOSIS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PAIN RELIEF, AMBULATION, AND SAFETY PROFILE

The multimodal management of canal stenosis is increasing, and inhibitors of central sensitization are playing a crucial role in central sensitization processes. Pregabalin and gabapentin are antiepileptic drugs that reduce presynaptic excitability. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the use of pregabalin and gabapentin is effective in the symptomatic management of canal stenosis.A literature search was conducted in four databases. The inclusion criteria were studies that compared pregabalin or gabapentin with a control group in lumbar canal stenosis. Randomized clinical trials and a comparative retrospective cohort study were included. The main clinical endpoints were VAS/NRS, ODI, and RDQ (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire) at 2, 4, 8 weeks, and 3 months, adverse events, and walking distance were also collected. Data were combined using Review Manager 5.4 software.Six studies and 392 patients were included. The mean age was 60.25. No significant differences were observed in VAS at 2, 4, and 8 weeks: (MD: 0.23; 95% CI: −0.63-1.09), (MD: −0.04; 95% CI: −0.64 to −0.57), and (MD: −0.6; 95% CI: −1.22 to 0.02). Significant differences were observed in favor of pregabalin with respect to VAS at three months: (MD: −2.97; 95% CI: −3.43 to −2.51). No significant differences were observed in ODI (MD: −3.47; 95% CI: −7.15 to −0.21). Adverse events were significantly higher in the pregabalin/gabapentin group (OR 5.88, 95%CI 1.28-27.05). Walking distance and RDQ could not be compared, although the results were controversial.Gabapentinoids have not been shown to be superior to other drugs used in the treatment of LSS or to placebo. However, they have shown a higher incidence of adverse effects, improved results in VAS at 3 months, and a slight improvement in ambulation at 4 months in combination with NSAIDs compared to NSAIDs in monotherapy.

Association Between Lumbar Spine Disorder and Genovarum: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

It is becoming increasingly important to study pathology at the knee and spine because of their role in causing pain and deformity in one another. Compression of the lumbar nerve root can disrupt innervation to the thigh muscles, cause an imbalance of muscle and result in varus deformity. In this study, we try to figure out the relation between lumbar spine disorders and genu varum and realize if lumbar spine disorders can cause varus deformity in a patient. In this cross-sectional study, the number of 53 patients with knee varus greater than 20 degrees who visited the orthopedic clinics of Rasoul Akram and Moheb Mehr hospitals affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences between 2020 and 2022 were investigated in terms of association with lumbar disorders. The demographic characteristics and clinical findings of the patients were recorded and collected using a checklist by referring to the patient's medical profiles. Radiographic findings were evaluated by referring to the imaging department and using the Pacs system. The diagnosis of the patients was based on the history and findings of the knee graph, which was measured with a goniometer to measure the knee angle. The frequency of lumbar disorders caused by pressure on the lumbar nerves in patients with genu varum deformity including canal stenosis, osteoarthritis, spondylolisthesis, and disc herniation was investigated. To investigate lumbar problems, patients' history and radiographic images as well as lumbosacral and knee MRI of patients were used. The mean age was 66.3 ± 7.66 years. 40 (75.5%) cases were female and 13 (24.5%) cases were male. Lumbar canal stenosis with 28(52.8%) and disc herniation with 32(60.4%) were the most common lumbar disorders in patients with knee varus more than 20 degrees. The mean age of patients with varus of more than 20 degrees with lumbar disorders was significantly higher than that of patients without lumbar disorders. (P: 0.001) There was no significant difference between gender distribution and lumbar disorders in patients with varus more than 20 degrees. Significant positive correlation between genu varum with lumbar canal stenosis (r: 0.53, P: 0.001), osteoarthritis (r: 0.38, P: 0.004), spondylolisthesis (r: 0.39, P: 0.002) and disc herniation (r: 0.46, P: 0.001) was reported2. An association between lumbar disorders and varus more than 20 degrees was found to be considerable.