Lumbar Apical Vertebrae Research Articles

Adjacent segment degeneration at a minimum 2-year follow-up after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: the impact of sagittal spinal proportion: a retrospective case series.

A retrospective cohort study. To investigate the sagittal plane configuration of the entire spine and its association with the risk of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Although PLIF has demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes, it is associated with ASD. However, the geometric mechanical changes that contribute to the occurrence of ASD are not well characterized. Radiological parameters were extracted from the whole lateral radiographs. Patients were divided into two groups: the ASD group (segmental kyphosis of ≥10º, and/or a ≥50% loss of disc height, and/or ≥3 mm of anteroposterior translation) and the non-ASD group. All 112 included patients underwent PLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years, with an average follow-up time of 63.6 months. Fifty-two patients (46.4%) were classified into the ASD group and of these, 13 required reoperation due to failure of conservative treatment. Patients with ASD exhibited significantly more caudal and posterior inflection vertebrae (IV), while the lumbar apical vertebra was significantly more caudal immediately after surgery. The IV position was identified as a significant risk factor for ASD, and the ASD incidence was significantly higher in the group where IV ≤5 (L1 vertebral body) than in the group where IV ≥5.5 (T12-L1 disc) (69.0% vs. 38.6%). The IV position is a significant risk factor for ASD development. Although it is difficult to control intraoperative IV levels, we note a high risk of ASD in patients with IV lower than T12-L1.

3D analysis of the preoperative deformity in AIS can be used to guide surgical treatment decisions for selective thoracic fusion.

To identify 3D measures of scoliosis from preoperative imaging that are associated with optimal radiographic outcomes after selective thoracic fusion (STF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Subjects with primary thoracic curves (Lenke 1-4, B or C modifiers) fused selectively (L1 or above) who had preoperative 3D reconstructions and minimum 2 years of follow-up were included. An optimal outcome at 2 years was defined as having 4 of 5 parameters previously defined in the literature: (1) lumbar curve < 26º, (2) deformity flexibility quotient < 4, (3) C7-CSVL < 2cm, (4) lumbar prominence < 5º and (5) trunk shift < 1.5cm. Univariate and CART analyses were performed to identify preoperative variables associated with achieving an optimal outcome 2 years postoperatively. Ninety-nine (88F, 11M) patients met inclusion. Mean age was 15 ± 2years. Fifty-one subjects (52%) had an optimal outcome. Seven preoperative deformity measures representing smaller thoracolumbar/lumbar deformity in the optimal group were found to be significant on univariate analysis. CART analysis identified the following variables associated with optimal outcomes: difference in apical rotation > 30° = 27% optimal outcomes, difference in apical rotation ≤ 30° and coronal vertebral wedging of lumbar apex > 3° = 46% optimal outcomes, and difference in apical rotation ≤ 30° and coronal vertebral wedging of lumbar apex ≤ 3° = 80% optimal outcomes (p < 0.05). Optimal outcomes after STF were associated with a preoperative difference in apical vertebral rotation in the axial plane less than 30° between thoracic and lumbar curves as well as coronal plane vertebral wedging of the lumbar apical vertebra less than 3°.

Effect of sagittal shape on proximal junctional kyphosis following thoracopelvic corrective fusion for adult spinal deformity: postoperative inflection vertebra cranial to T12 is a significant risk factor.

This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected consecutive case series of patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). This study aimed to investigate the impact of the geometrical sagittal shape of the corrected spine on the development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Several studies have documented risk factors for PJK in ASD surgery. Geometrical assessment is vital for evaluating sagittal spinal deformity. It is essential to assess the postoperative geometrical shape of the spine and the location of the correction in the spine to decrease postoperative junctional stress and PJK. Consecutive patients with ASD who underwent corrective fusion with long constructs to the pelvis were included. Patients with neuromuscular disease, congenital and adolescent scoliosis, infection, and spinal tumor were excluded. We investigated the spinopelvic and geometrical parameters of the whole spine. The locations of the thoracic and lumbar apical vertebrae and the inflection vertebrae (IV), where the curvature of the associated adjacent vertebral bodies changes from kyphosis to lordosis, were investigated. The subjects were divided into PJK included patients who underwent revision surgery for junctional failure or with a change in proximal junctional angle ≥ 20°, and non-PJK groups. A total of 139 patients (mean age, 69.6years; range 18-82years) were included. There were 47 and 92 patients in the PJK and non-PJK groups, respectively. The IV were located significantly cranial and posterior, the lumbar apex were located significantly posterior in the PJK group at the immediate postoperative time points. The significant risk factors for PJK on binary logistic regression were cranial IV and posterior lumbar apical vertebrae. The incidence of PJK in patients with IV at T12 or cranial tends PJK significantly higher (69%) than at L1 or caudal (26%). Geometrical spinal shape should be taken into account to reduce the rate of postoperative mechanical complications. Level of evidence III.

Global postural re-education in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical modeling and analysis of curve reduction during active and assisted self-correction

BackgroundGlobal postural re-education (GPR) is a physiotherapy treatment approach for pediatric idiopathic scoliosis (IS), where the physiotherapist qualitatively assesses scoliotic curvature reduction potential (with a manual correction) and patient’s ability to self-correct (self-correction). To the author’s knowledge, there are no studies regarding GPR applied to IS, hence there is a need to better understand the biomechanics of GPR curve reduction postures. The objective was to biomechanically and quantitatively evaluate those two re-education corrections using a computer model combined with experimental testing.MethodsFinite elements models of 16 patients with IS (10.5–15.4 years old, average Cobb angle of 33°) where built from surface scans and 3D radiographic reconstructions taken in normal standing and self-corrected postures. The forces applied with the therapist’s hands over the trunk during manual correction were recorded and used in the FEM to simulate this posture. Self-correction was simulated by moving the thoracic and lumbar apical vertebrae from their presenting position to their self-corrected position as seen on radiographs. A stiffness index was defined for each posture as the global force required to stay in the posture divided by the thoracic curve reduction (force/Cobb angle reduction).ResultsThe average force applied by the therapist during manual correction was 31 N and resulted in a simulated average reduction of 26% (p < 0.05), while kyphosis slightly increased and lordosis remained unchanged. The actual self-correction reduced the thoracic curve by an average of 33% (p < 0.05), while the lumbar curve remained unchanged. The thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis were reduced on average by 6° and 5° (p < 0.05). Self-correction simulations correlated with actual self-correction (r = 0.9).ConclusionsThis study allowed quantification of thoracic curve reducibility obtained by external forces applications as well as patient’s capacity to self-correct their posture, two corrections commonly used in the GPR approach.

Relationships Between the Axial Derotation of the Lower Instrumented Vertebra and Uninstrumented Lumbar Curve Correction: Radiographic Outcome in Lenke 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Preoperative spinal parameters are used to guide the fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) spinal surgery. However, the impact of the factors modifiable by the surgeon in varying levels of preoperative patient-specific variables is not fully explored. The goal of this study was to identify the association between axial rotation correction of the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) and spontaneous correction of the uninstrumented lumbar spine as a function of preoperative 3 dimensional (3D) curve characteristics in Lenke 1 AIS. Twenty-three Lenke1 AIS with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. All patients had biplanar spinal x-rays and 3D reconstructions at preoperative, first erect, and 2-year follow-up visits. Five patient factors were measured preoperatively: kyphosis and lumbar modifiers, and thoracic to lumbar curve rotation, translation, and frontal deformity angle ratios. One surgical factor, percentage of LIV rotation correction, was determined from the preoperative and first erect 3D models. A factorial design analysis was implemented to determine the impact of surgical and patient factors, both separately and in combination, on 2-year radiographic outcomes of spontaneous correction of the uninstrumented spine. Spontaneous lumbar Cobb and lumbar apical rotation correction were predicted significantly by patient and surgical factors, P<0.05. Lumbar modifier, percentage correction of LIV rotation, the interaction between LIV rotation correction and lumbar modifier, and the interaction between LIV rotation correction and thoracic to lumbar apical vertebrae translation ratio correlated significantly to 2-year outcomes of spontaneous lumbar Cobb correction, P<0.05. Lumbar modifier and the interaction between the Cobb ratio and the percentage of the LIV rotation correction correlated significantly to 2-year outcomes of lumbar apical rotation correction, P<0.05. The relationship between LIV rotation correction and spontaneous lumbar curve correction after selective thoracic fusion varied based on the patient's 3D preoperative curve characteristics. Patients with lumbar modifier C and apical vertebrae translation ratios >1.5 showed improved lumbar Cobb correction in 2-years when 50% or more LIV rotation correction was achieved surgically.

Timing of Changes in Three-Dimensional Spinal Parameters After Selective Thoracic Fusion in Lenke 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Two-Year Follow-up

Study DesignRetrospective analysis of the prospectively collected data. ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between the axial rotation of the unfused lumbar spine and the parameters of the instrumented thoracic spine at varying time points after selective thoracic fusion (STF) in Lenke 1B and 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Summary of Background DataThe impact of STF on the spontaneous lumbar curve correction in AIS has been studied mainly in the frontal planes. The relationship between the spontaneous transverse plane correction of the lumbar spine and the parameters of the fused thoracic spine is not well documented. MethodsTwenty-one Lenke 1B and 1C patients who had received STF with minimum two years' follow-up were selected. Thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles, kyphosis, lordosis, and thoracic and lumbar apical vertebrae rotations were measured at preoperative, first-erect, six-month, one-year, and two-year follow-ups. The association between the lumbar apical vertebral rotation and other thoracic and lumbar variables at different time points were determined using regression analysis. The variables significantly predicting the lumbar axial rotation correction at two years were determined from the preceding follow-up visits. ResultsKyphosis, thoracic Cobb, thoracic apical vertebral rotation, and lumbar Cobb were significantly different between the preoperative and all the postoperative follow-ups (p < .05). At the two-year follow-up, a decrease in thoracic rotation and lumbar Cobb and a higher residual thoracic Cobb were associated with an improved spontaneous lumbar rotation (R2 = 0.41, p < .05). Lumbar rotation at two years was predicted from thoracic derotation and lumbar Cobb at first erect (R2 = 0.30, p < .05). ConclusionSpontaneous lumbar curve rotation correction correlated to the fused and unfused spinal parameters in the three anatomic planes. The relationship between thoracic and lumbar rotation persist up to two years after STF. Thoracic derotation is an important factor determining the lumbar rotation correction at two years after STF.

The effectiveness of selective thoracic fusion for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review protocol.

REVIEW QUESTION / OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to assess the effectiveness of selective thoracic fusion as a form of treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. This will be compared with all other forms of operative management for major structural thoracic curves. INCLUSION CRITERIA Types of participants A comprehensive and exhaustive literature search will be conducted for studies that include children aged 10-18 years with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who have a scoliosis curve with a thoracic component that is described as structural (as described by the Lenke classification). In addition those with congenital, neuromuscular or syndromic causes for their scoliosis or any previous spinal fusion will be excluded. Types of intervention This review will consider studies that evaluate fusion of the thoracic curve with distal fusion no lower than L1. Both anterior and posterior approaches will be included; however any patient who receives both will be excluded. All forms of instrumentation for fusion such as pedicle screws, hooks and rods will be included. This will be compared where possible to any other surgical fusion for a structural thoracic curve. This will include studies that compare selective and non-selective spinal fusion in the same article, or selective spinal fusion only, but not non-selective spinal fusion only. Types of outcomes Primary outcomes include: Functional/Quality of life survey (SRS- 22, SRS-24, SRS-30 or similar). Complication rate – including, but not limited to, adding on, coronal imbalance, junctional kyphosis and re-operation. Respiratory function. Secondary outcomes include: Postoperative main thoracic Cobb angle, and average change in angle. Postoperative compensatory lumbar Cobb angle, and average change in angle. Coronal balance. Sagittal balance. Apical vertebral rotation and change.

Postoperative spinal alignment remodeling in Lenke 1C scoliosis treated with selective thoracic fusion

Selective thoracic fusion may cause spinal imbalance in certain patients; how the spinal alignment changes over time after surgery is highly correlated with the final spinal balance. To investigate how spinal alignment changes over time after selective thoracic fusion and how spinal alignment remodeling affects spinal balance. All adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) cases surgically treated in our institution between 2002 and 2008 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: Lenke 1C scoliosis patients treated with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs; the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) ended at L1 level or above; and 2-year radiographic follow-up. Standing anteroposterior and lateral digital radiographs from four different time points (preoperatively, immediately, 3 months, and 2 years postoperatively) were reviewed. In each standing anteroposterior radiograph, the center sacral vertical line (CSVL, the vertical line that bisects the proximal sacrum) was first drawn, and the translation (deviation from the CSVL) of some key vertebrae was measured, such as the LIV, LIV+1 (the first vertebra below LIV), LIV+2 (the second vertebra below LIV), LIV+3 (the third vertebra below LIV), lumbar apical vertebra (AV), thoracic AV, and T1. Additionally, the Cobb angles of the major thoracic and lumbar curves were measured at different time points, and the correction rates were calculated. Furthermore, clinical photographs of the patients from the back were taken preoperatively and postoperatively. Of 278 AIS patients reviewed, 29 met the inclusion criteria. The continuous follow-up of our present study revealed an interesting phenomenon: postoperative spinal alignment remodeling. A hypothetical criterion was established to determine the onset of the phenomenon. By means of a series of analyses, the criterion was validated. The results of our present study showed that selective thoracic fusion tended to cause leftward spinal imbalance in these Lenke 1C AIS patients. Twenty of the 29 patients had leftward spinal imbalance immediately after surgery. Although some patients regained spinal balance through postoperative spinal alignment remodeling, 11 patients remained imbalanced at 2-year follow-up. Selective thoracic fusion is prone to cause leftward spinal imbalance in Lenke 1C scoliosis patients. Postoperative spinal alignment remodeling can facilitate recovery of spinal balance in some patients. Postoperative spinal imbalance in Lenke 1C scoliosis patients could be prevented by selecting stable vertebra or the vertebrae above as LIV, checking the balance condition during surgery, or considering ratio criteria when selecting candidates for selective thoracic fusion.

Lowest instrumented vertebra selection in Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis: what if we choose lumbar apical vertebra as distal fusion end?

The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not post-op curve behaviour differs due to different choices of lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) with reference to lumbar apical vertebra (LAV) in Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis. We reviewed all the AIS cases surgically treated in our institution from 2002 through 2008. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with Lenke 3C or 6C scoliosis who were treated with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs; (2) 2-year radiographic follow-up. All the included patients were categorized into three groups based on the relative position of LIV and LAV: Group A-the LIV was above the LAV; Group B-the LIV was at the LAV; Group C-the LIV was below the LAV. All the radiographic parameters were then compared among the groups. All image data were available in our picture archiving and communication systems. Standing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral digital radiographs were reviewed at four times (pre-op, post-op, 3-month and 2-year). In each standing AP radiograph, centre sacral vertical line (CSVL, the vertical line that bisects the proximal sacrum) was first drawn, followed by measuring T1-CSVL, LIV-CSVL, (LIV+1)-CSVL, LAV-CSVL and thoracic AV-CSVL distance. In addition, the Cobb angles of major thoracic and lumbar curves were measured at the four times and the correction rates were then calculated. Of the 278 patients reviewed, 40 met the inclusion criteria; 11 of these were included in Group A (LIV above LAV), another 11 in Group B (LIV at LAV) and the remaining 18 in Group C (LIV below LAV). At 2-year follow-up, the lumbar vertebrae such as LIV, LIV+1 and LAV were all more deviated than before surgery in Group A (LIV above LAV), whereas in Group B and C (LIV at and below LAV) they were all less deviated than before surgery. No significant differences were found in thoracic or lumbar correction rate, global coronal balance and incidence rate of trunk shift among the three groups. In conclusion, in Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis, post-op lumbar curve behaviour differs due to different choices of LIV with reference to LAV, that is, the deviation of lumbar curve improves when the LIV is either at or below the LAV but deteriorates when the LIV is above the LAV. Although the greatest correction occurs when the LIV is below the LAV, choosing LAV as LIV can still be the optimal option in certain cases, since it can yield similar correction while preserving more lumbar mobility and growth potential.

Extensive fusion for Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis: a two year radiographic follow-up

To investigate the correction effectiveness, incidence rate of distal adding on, and post-operative spinal balance in Lenke 3C and 6C AIS treated with extensive fusion using posterior pedicle screw-only constructs. We reviewed all AIS cases surgically treated in our institution between 2002 and 2008. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Lenke 3C or 6C scoliosis patients who were treated with extensive fusion using posterior pedicle screw-only constructs; (2) minimum two year radiographic follow-up; (3) the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) ended at L2, L3 or L4 level. All image data were available in our picture archiving and communication systems (PACSs) , and all radiographic measurements were performed. Standing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral digital radiographs were reviewed at four different time points (pre-op, post-op, three months, and two years). In each standing AP radiograph, CSVL (center sacral vertical line, the vertical line bisecting the proximal sacrum) was first drawn, followed by measurement of the translation (deviation from the CSVL) of some key vertebrae, such as the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV), LIV + 1 (the first vertebra below LIV), lumbar apical vertebra, thoracic apical vertebra and T1, enabling depiction of how translation of different parts of the spine changes over time. Additionally, the Cobb angles of major thoracic and lumbar curves were measured at the different time points and the correction rate was calculated. Of the 278 patients reviewed, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Immediately after surgery, satisfactory corrections were achieved from the perspective of not only Cobb angle but also vertebral translation. And the corrections were well retained in the following two years. The incidence rate of distal adding-on was low in this group of patients. In the course of two years following surgery, only six patients had an increase of greater than 5 mm in LIV + 1 translation, and among which only two patients had greater than 10 mm. Regarding global balance, overall, it neither improved nor deteriorated after extensive fusion. Furthermore, trunk shift was found in only three patients at two year follow-up. In Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis, extensive fusion can produce satisfactory corrections from the perspectives of both Cobb angle and vertebral translation and rarely causes significant distal adding-on, global imbalance or trunk shift.

Predicting the Outcome of Selective Thoracic Fusion in False Double Major Lumbar “C” Cases With Five- to Twenty-Four-Year Follow-up

Retrospective radiographic and clinical study. To examine the long-term outcome of selective thoracic fusion (STF) performed for lumbar "C" modifier curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The efficacy of STF in lumbar "C" false double major curves is controversial. We examined the 5- to 24-year outcomes of patients with "C" lumbar curves who underwent STF at a single institution to determine which factors help predict successful outcome. Thirty-two patients (age, 14.8 ± 2.0 years) with a lumbar "C" modifier underwent primary STF and had minimum 5-year follow-up (mean, 6.8 years). All patients were fused distally to either T12 or L1. At latest follow-up, 18 were considered successful (group S), 2 required reoperation to accommodate worsening deformity (group R), and 12 were considered marginal outcomes (group M), as defined by >3 cm coronal imbalance (n = 5), >5 mm worsening of lumbar apical vertebra translation compared with preoperative (n = 4), >1 Nash-Moe grade worsening of lumbar apical vertebra rotation (n = 1), >10° thoracolumbar junction kyphosis which was at least 5° worse than preoperative (n = 5), and lumbar Cobb angle >5° worse than preoperative (n = 2). Clinical outcomes were determined by Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-30 at final follow-up. Of the multiple factors considered, 2-month postoperative standing lumbar sagittal alignment was most predictive for long-term outcome (P < 0.019 by Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA). Satisfactory outcomes had statistically significantly greater T12-S1 lordosis than those that were marginal (64.8° (group S) vs. 52.0° (group M); P = 0.014) or required reoperation (64.8° [group S] vs. 38.0° [group R]; P < 0.001). Traditionally considered variables such as apical vertebra rotation, apical vertebra translation, Cobb angle magnitudes, coronal and sagittal balance, and their respective thoracic-to-lumbar ratios were not independently significant. Selective thoracic fusions performed for lumbar "C" modifier scoliotic deformities generally have excellent long-term radiographic and SRS-30 outcomes at 5- to 24-year follow-up. Care should be taken to ensure that overcorrection of the thoracic curve is not performed beyond the ability of the lumbar curve to compensate. Furthermore, consideration of selective thoracic fusion should not be ruled out simply because the patient may have a somewhat stiff lumbar curve based on side-bending radiographs.

Fixed lumbar apical vertebral rotation predicts spinal decompensation in lenke type 3c adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after selective posterior thoracic correction and fusion

Retrospective radiographic review of surgically treated double major curves (Lenke type 3C) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. To evaluate the role of selective posterior thoracic correction and fusion in double major curves with third generation instrumentation and to identify preoperative radiographic parameters that predict postoperative coronal spinal decompensation. Traditionally the surgical treatment of double major curves consists of fusion of both the thoracic and the lumbar curve. Few attempt to perform selective thoracic fusion in this curve pattern because of the potential to create spinal imbalance. Thirty-six patients with Lenke type 3C curves underwent a selective posterior thoracic correction and fusion with either Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation or the Universal Spine System. Radiographs were evaluated to assess coronal and sagittal balance, curve flexibility, and curve correction at a minimum follow up of 2 years. Postoperative coronal spinal decompensation was investigated with respect to preoperative radiographic parameters on standing anteroposterior (AP), standing lateral radiographs, thoracic and lumbar supine side-bending radiographs. Coronal spinal decompensation was defined as plumbline deviation of C7 of more than 2 cm with respect to the centre sacral vertical line (CSVL) within 2 years of surgery. Twenty-six patients (72%) showed satisfactory frontal plane alignment patients (28%) showed coronal spinal decompensation. Significant group differences, however, were identified for lumbar apical vertebral rotation, measured according to Perdriolle (La scoliose. Son êtude tridimensionnelle. Maloine, Paris, pp 179, 1979) (A 16 degrees , B 22 degrees , P = 0.02), percentage correction (derotation) of lumbar apical vertebrae in lumbar supine side-bending films in comparison to standing AP radiographs (A 49%, B 27%, P = 0.002) and thoracic curve flexibility (A 43%, B 25%, P = 0.03). High correlation was noted between postoperative decompensation and derotation of lumbar apical vertebrae in pre-operative lumbar supine side-bending films with a critical value of 40% (Pearson correlation coefficient; P = 0.62, P < 0.001). Ten of 36 patients (28%) with Lenke type 3C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis showed coronal spinal decompensation of more than 2 cm after selective posterior thoracic correction and fusion. Lumbar apical vertebral derotation of less than 40% provided the radiographic prediction of postoperative coronal spinal imbalance. We advise close scrutiny of the transverse plane in the lumbar supine bending film when planning surgical strategy.

PREDICTION OF SCOLIOTIC COBB ANGLE WITH THE USE OF THE SCOLIOMETER

Study design A prospective study was conducted in a young homogenous adolescent population, with the use of the scoliometer. Objectives To create a mathematic formula that provides the accurate Cobb angle of idiopathic scoliosis with the use of the scoliometer only. Summary of background data The scoliometer is an accepted method for detection and evaluation of scoliosis during screening programs. To the author's knowledge, there are no previous methods and formulas to estimate the approximate Cobb angle using only the scoliometer. Methods Several clinical (scoliometer value, age, and sex) and radiographic (Cobb angle, Perdriolle of and apical vertebra, Risser iliac apophysis classification) parameters from 442 (4.37%) of 10,109 screened adolescents who had a scoliometer value of at least 7 degrees were taken and correlated using the simple and multiple linear regression analysis. Results Cobb angle and scoliometer value were statistically significantly correlated to each other. Two mathematic formulas were created to predict the Cobb angle of the thoracic and lumbar scoliosis, with similar sensitivity and accuracy. The thoracic and lumbar scoliometer values were statistic significantly correlated with the thoracic and lumbar Cobb angle (P = 0.0254 and P = 0.0015, respectively). The lumbar scoliometer value was significantly correlated with lumbar apical vertebra Perdriolle value. Also, the thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles were significantly correlated with thoracic and lumbar apical vertebra (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0015, respectively). Conclusions In the present study, the authors have constructed two mathematic formulas, which provide accurately the scoliotic Cobb angle in young adolescents using only the scoliometer with a deviation of 5.63 degrees thoracic curves and 5.79 degrees for lumbar curves. The authors recommended that all physicians engaged in scoliosis screening programs use the scoliometer based on the mathematic formulas that the authors developed. They believe that this method will reduce the cost of school screening programs, the overdiagnosis, and the unnecessary exposure to irradiation of this young population in the future.

Prediction of scoliotic cobb angle with the use of the scoliometer.

A prospective study was conducted in a young homogenous adolescent population, with the use of the scoliometer. To create a mathematic formula that provides the accurate Cobb angle of idiopathic scoliosis with the use of the scoliometer only. The scoliometer is an accepted method for detection and evaluation of scoliosis during screening programs. To the author's knowledge, there are no previous methods and formulas to estimate the approximate Cobb angle using only the scoliometer. Several clinical (scoliometer value, age, and sex) and radiographic (Cobb angle, Perdriolle of and apical vertebra, Risser iliac apophysis classification) parameters from 442 (4.37%) of 10,109 screened adolescents who had a scoliometer value of at least 7 degrees were taken and correlated using the simple and multiple linear regression analysis. Cobb angle and scoliometer value were statistically significantly correlated to each other. Two mathematic formulas were created to predict the Cobb angle of the thoracic and lumbar scoliosis, with similar sensitivity and accuracy. The thoracic and lumbar scoliometer values were statistic significantly correlated with the thoracic and lumbar Cobb angle (P = 0.0254 and P = 0.0015, respectively). The lumbar scoliometer value was significantly correlated with lumbar apical vertebra Perdriolle value. Also, the thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles were significantly correlated with thoracic and lumbar apical vertebra (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0015, respectively). In the present study, the authors have constructed two mathematic formulas, which provide accurately the scoliotic Cobb angle in young adolescents using only the scoliometer with a deviation of 5.63 degrees thoracic curves and 5.79 degrees for lumbar curves. The authors recommended that all physicians engaged in scoliosis screening programs use the scoliometer based on the mathematic formulas that the authors developed. They believe that this method will reduce the cost of school screening programs, the overdiagnosis, and the unnecessary exposure to irradiation of this young population in the future.

Geometric Analysis of Coronal Decompensation in Idiopathic Scoliosis

Frontal plane geometry of postoperative curves was analyzed using a geometric model to investigate the relationship between coronal decompensation and postoperative apical shifts from the center sacral line for various thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles. To determine if a balanced spinal configuration is possible when the postoperative lumbar curve is larger than the thoracic curve, and to determine the limits on the postoperative magnitude of the lumbar curve relative to the thoracic curve beyond which a spinal configuration with acceptable balance cannot be achieved. Previous studies have suggested that overcorrection of the primary thoracic curve may be the principal cause of coronal decompensation after selective thoracic correction and fusion in King Type II curves. Also, other causative factors, such as inappropriate selection of fusion levels and hook patterns, have been implicated as possible reasons for decompensation after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. Postoperative thoracic curves of 20 degrees, 25 degrees, and 30 degrees were simulated on a model spine. For each thoracic Cobb angle, three left lumbar curves were simulated with the lumbar curve larger than thoracic by 5 degrees, 10 degrees, and 15 degrees. For each combination of thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles, spinal configurations corresponding to different lateral shifts of the thoracic and lumbar apical vertebrae from the center sacral line were obtained. For a given combination of postoperative thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles, there is an optimal range of postoperative lateral distance between the thoracic and lumbar apices (relative apical distance) that will maintain acceptable balance (decompensation < or = 10 mm). Smaller values of the relative apical distance will decompensate the spine. For a constant postoperative thoracic Cobb angle, the postoperative distance between the thoracic and lumbar apices needed to maintain a balanced spine increases with increasing postoperative lumbar Cobb angle. Similarly, for a constant difference between the postoperative thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles, the postoperative distance between the thoracic and lumbar apices needed to maintain a balance spine increases with increasing postoperative thoracic Cobb angle. For postoperative thoracic curves of 20 degrees-30 degrees, acceptable balance can be achieved when the magnitude of the postoperative lumbar curve is up to twice the thoracic curve as long as adequate postoperative relative apical distance can be maintained. Decompensation does not appear to be caused by the relative magnitudes of the postoperative thoracic and lumbar curves, but is a result of inadequate relative distance between the thoracic and lumbar apical vertebrae in the postoperative geometry.