LTLE Patients Research Articles

Exploration of hemispheric specialization and lexico-semantic processing in unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy with verbal fluency tasks

Verbal production has been shown to rely on both hemispheres differentially. To determine how lateralized brain lesions affect the generation of isolated words, we evaluated three subject groups: normal controls ( n=22), and patients with right ( n=23), and left ( n=22) non-operated temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) using three verbal fluency tasks (letter, phonetic, semantic). LTLE patients produced fewer words than controls in the phonetic, letter, semantic conditions, whereas RTLE patients were only impaired in the semantic task. Hence, there would be a hemispheric specialization in language where phonetic processing involves mostly the left temporal lobe and semantic aspects of production involve both temporal lobes. And, in order to study disruption of semantic lexicon involved in supermarket fluency (to name things which can be bought in a supermarket), specific indicators Tröster et al., (1998) [Tröster AI, Fields JA, Testa JA, Paul RH, Blanco CR, Hames KA, Salmon DP, Beatty WW. Cortical and subcortical influences on clustering and switching in the preformance of verbal fluency Tasks, Neuropaychologia 1998;36:295–304.] were exploited. Our results indicated that TLE groups made fewer category shifts than controls. Also, RTLE patients used labels more frequently and produced fewer exemplars. Results show the specificity of processing according to cue, and suggest that the semantic fluency deficits due to TLE be primarily due to an alteration of the mental lexicon.

Event-related potentials in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy reveal topography specific lateralization in relation to the side of the epileptic focus

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during a continuous recognition memory paradigm in patients with left-sided (LTLE; n=8) or right-sided temporal lobe epilepsy (RTLE; n=6), and in healthy control subjects ( n=24). Control subjects and both patient groups exhibited consistent OLD/NEW ERP-differences from 200–600 ms after stimulus onset. ERPs did not differ significantly between LTLE and RTLE patients, with respect to OLD/NEW distinction or the type of presented material (verbal vs. non-verbal). However, ERP topography showed significant differences between LTLE and RTLE patients: in lateral fronto-temporal recordings, patients showed larger negativities contralateral to the seizure focus, whereas we found larger negativities ipsilateral to the seizure focus in parietal recordings. Differences between the groups were significant from 300 to 600 ms post-stimulus. As a consequence, the amplitude gradient from fronto-temporal to parietal recordings was higher on the right side in LTLE patients and on the left side in RTLE patients. Again, differences between LTLE and RTLE patients were highly significant. We assume that ERPs reflect disturbances of a cortico-cortical network dependent on the side of the seizure focus in temporal lobe epilepsy. Furthermore, scalp-recorded ERPs might be a useful tool in the prediction of the side of the seizure focus in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.

Asymmetries in the effect of side of seizure onset on recognition memory following intracarotid amobarbital injection.

To assess interhemispheric differences in recognition memory for objects during the intracarotid amobarbital sodium procedure (IAP). The recognition memory for real objects of patients with either right (RTLE; n = 28) or left (LTLE; n = 22) temporal lobe epilepsy was assessed at baseline, and after left and right intracarotid amobarbital sodium injection. There were no differences between groups on baseline performance. Performance following injection ipsilateral to the side of seizure focus was relatively lower for the LTLE as compared with the RTLE group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. However, performance following injection contralateral to the side of seizure focus was significantly lower for the RTLE as compared with the LTLE group. Within-group differences in performance after ipsilateral as compared with contralateral injection were significant for the RTLE but not the LTLE group. The difference in interhemispheric asymmetry in IAP memory performance between RTLE and LTLE groups was reflected in decreased ability to classify LTLE patients as compared with RTLE patients about side of seizure onset, using a clinically applicable decision rule. Recognition memory during the IAP for real objects, simultaneously named and presented visually during encoding, is mediated effectively by both the left and right hemisphere when there is no seizure focus present. However, memory appears to be more vulnerable to the presence of a seizure focus in the right as compared with the left hemisphere.