Least-squares Mean Difference Research Articles

Efficacy and Safety of a Preservative-Free Latanoprost Cationic Emulsion in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Concurrent Ocular Surface Disease: A Randomized Phase 2 Study.

Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP), ocular surface disease (OSD) parameters, and safety in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG)/ocular hypertension (OH) and concurrent OSD treated with preservative-free latanoprost 0.005% cationic emulsion (PF-latanoprost-E) or travoprost-Z 0.004% ophthalmical solution containing a soft preservative system. Methods: Patients with OAG/OH and OSD were randomized to treatment with PF-latanoprost-E or travoprost-Z nightly for 3 months. Outcomes included mean diurnal IOP reduction; OSD endpoints, including symptom improvement, tear break-up time (TBUT), and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score; and safety after 1 and 3 months. Results: A total of 105 patients were randomized, 51 to PF-latanoprost-E and 54 to travoprost-Z. IOP reductions (LS mean differences) at 3 months were numerically greater in the PF-latanoprost-E than in the travoprost-Z group at 8AM (7.2 versus 6.0 mmHg), 10AM (6.7 versus 5.9 mmHg), and 4PM (6.0 versus 5.4 mmHg). LS mean changes in IOP from baseline in both groups at 1 and 3 months, however, were comparable. Mean ± SD CFS scores on the Ora scale at month 3 showed significantly greater reductions in the PF-latanoprost-E than in the travoprost-Z group (-1.07 ± 1.863 versus -0.16 ± 2.553 P = 0.0461). The mean TBUT at month 3 showed similar improvements in both groups (1.1 versus 1.0 s, P > 0.05). OSD symptoms improved but did not differ significantly in the two groups. Overall safety was comparable in both groups. Conclusion: PF-latanoprost-E effectively and safely lowered IOP and improved OSD parameters in patients with OAG/OH. These findings provide evidence for the beneficial effects of this new formulation of latanoprost in glaucoma patients with OSD.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a randomized, phase 3 trial of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV+P) versus platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC).

108 Background: EV+P nearly doubled median progression-free survival and overall survival vs PBC in patients (pts) with previously untreated la/mUC in the phase 3 EV-302 trial. PROs are reported here. Methods: In EV-302 (NCT04223856) pts were randomized 1:1 to EV+P or PBC (gemcitabine with cisplatin or carboplatin). PRO assessments included the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), and the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) completed at baseline, weekly for 12 weeks (wks), then every 3 wks through survival follow-up, inclusive of the time post-progression. Time to pain progression (TTPP) and mean change from baseline in worst pain at wk 26 using the BPI-SF were prespecified analyses statistically tested using a gatekeeping strategy. Mean change from baseline through wk 26 and time to confirmed deterioration (TTCD) of EORTC-QLQ-C30 and BPI-SF domains were prespecified descriptive analyses. TTPP and TTCD were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Of 886 pts randomized, 731 (376 received EV+P; 355 PBC) completed baseline PRO questionnaires. Compliance rates differed between arms and remained >70% through wk 29 for EV+P and through only wk 17 for PBC. Median TTPP was 14.2 months (mos) with EV+P and 10.0 mos with PBC (hazard ratio [HR]=0.92; 95% CI=0.72, 1.17; 2-sided p-value=0.48). The least squares (LS) mean reduction in worst pain at wk 26 was numerically greater with EV+P vs PBC (-0.61 vs -0.03, LS mean difference [95% CI]: -0.58 [-1.05, -0.11] [nominal 2-sided P = 0.015]). Pts with moderate to severe pain at baseline who were treated with EV+P (n=128, 34%) had a meaningful (>2 pt) improvement from baseline in BPI worst pain from wk 3 through 26. In EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life [GHS/QoL], EV+P demonstrated a transient worsening at week 3 (-6.3) that returned to baseline from weeks 4 through 26, while patients treated with PBC demonstrated deterioration from week 1 through week 17 (range -1.2 to -7.1) where scores returned to baseline. TTCD for EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL was 5.9 mos with EV+P vs 3.2 mos with PBC (HR = 0.98 [95% CI]: 0.79 – 1.2). Conclusions: Pts treated with EV+P have improved survival compared with PBC without detriment to quality of life and functioning, further supporting the value of EV+P for pts with la/mUC. Compliance, especially after progression, was lower than expected (particularly in the PBC arm) and may have impacted the results. Clinical trial information: NCT04223856 .

Effect of ensifentrine on dyspnea in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis of the ENHANCE trials

ABSTRACT Background Dyspnea is a critical component of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We report the effect of ensifentrine, a novel PDE3/PDE4 inhibitor, on dyspnea using pooled data from the Phase 3 ENHANCE-1/2 trials. Methods The pooled population (ensifentrine, n = 975; placebo, n = 574) included patients aged 40–80 years with post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.7, FEV1 30–70% predicted, mMRC Dyspnea Scale score ≥2, and a smoking history ≥10 pack-years. Patients taking dual LAMA/LABA or LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy were excluded. Dyspnea measures included the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS), and rescue medication use. Results After 24 weeks, ensifentrine significantly improved TDI scores (least-squares mean difference, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.64, 1.30; p < 0.001) and across all TDI subdomains. Ensifentrine-treated patients were more likely to be TDI responders at week 24 (p < 0.001), which was consistent across clinically relevant subgroups. Ensifentrine-treated patients had improved E-RS breathlessness subdomain scores (p = 0.053) and reduced rescue medication use (p = 0.002). Conclusion Ensifentrine produced clinically meaningful improvements in multiple dyspnea measures in patients with symptomatic, moderate-to-severe COPD. A limitation of this study was the exclusion of patients taking dual LAMA/LABA and LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy. Clinical trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov identifiers are ENHANCE-1: NCT04535986; ENHANCE-2: NCT04542057.

Daridorexant in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

ObjectiveThis Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of daridorexant in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder. Patients/methods490 patients with insomnia disorder from 95 sites in Japan were randomized to daridorexant 50 mg (n = 163), 25 mg (n = 163) or placebo (n = 164) for 4 weeks, followed by a 7-day placebo run-out and a 30-day safety follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoints, in hierarchical order, were change from baseline at Week 4 in subjective total sleep time (sTST) and subjective latency to sleep onset (sLSO), for daridorexant 50 mg vs placebo. sTST and sLSO were also evaluated (secondary endpoints) for daridorexant 25 mg vs placebo. Safety endpoints included adverse events and next-morning sleepiness (Visual Analog Scale, VAS). ResultsDaridorexant 50 mg significantly increased sTST and decreased sLSO versus placebo at Week 4 (least-squares mean difference [LSMD]: sTST 20.3 min [95 % CI 11.4, 29.2] p < 0.001; sLSO −10.7 min [−15.8, −5.5] p < 0.001). Daridorexant 25 mg also significantly improved both endpoints versus placebo (LSMD: sTST 9.2 min [0.3, 18.1] p = 0.042; sLSO −7.2 min [-12.3, −2.0] p = 0.006). Overall incidence of adverse events was similar across groups (50 mg: 22 %; 25 mg: 18 %; placebo 23 %); somnolence, the most common event, increased with increasing dose (50 mg: 6.8 %; 25 mg: 3.7 %; placebo 1.8 %). However, daridorexant did not increase VAS next-morning sleepiness. No rebound or withdrawal-related symptoms were observed after treatment discontinuation. ConclusionsIn Japanese patients with insomnia disorder, daridorexant (25 and 50 mg) was well tolerated and significantly improved subjective sleep outcomes, with no evidence of residual effects.

Efficacy of Atogepant in Chronic Migraine With and Without Acute Medication Overuse in the Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 PROGRESS Trial.

Atogepant is an oral, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. We evaluated the efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM) in participants with and without acute medication overuse. This subgroup analysis of the phase 3, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled PROGRESS trial evaluated adults with a ≥1-year history of CM, ≥15 monthly headache days (MHDs), and ≥8 monthly migraine days (MMDs) during the 4-week baseline period. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, atogepant 30 mg twice daily (BID), or atogepant 60 mg once daily (QD) for 12 weeks and were analyzed by acute medication overuse status (triptans/ergots for ≥10 days per month, simple analgesics for ≥15 days per month, or combinations of triptans/ergots/simple analgesics for ≥10 days per month). Outcomes included change from baseline in mean MMDs, MHDs, and monthly acute medication use days; ≥50% reduction in mean MMDs across 12 weeks; and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Of 755 participants in the modified intent-to-treat population, 500 (66.2%) met baseline acute medication overuse criteria (placebo, n = 169 [68.7%]; atogepant 30 mg BID, n = 161 [63.6%]; atogepant 60 mg QD, n = 170 [66.4%]). The least squares mean difference (LSMD) (95% CI) from placebo in MMDs was -2.7 (-4.0 to -1.4) with atogepant 30 mg BID and -1.9 (-3.2 to -0.6) with atogepant 60 mg QD. Mean MHDs (LSMD [95% CI] -2.8 [-4.0 to -1.5] and -2.1 [-3.3 to -0.8]) and mean acute medication use days (LSMD [95% CI] -2.8 [-4.1 to -1.6] and -2.6 [-3.9 to -1.3]) were reduced and a higher proportion of participants achieved ≥50% reduction in MMDs (odds ratio [95% CI] 2.5 [1.5-4.0] and 2.3 [1.4-3.7]) with atogepant 30 mg BID and atogepant 60 mg QD. There was a 52.1%-61.9% reduction in the proportion of atogepant-treated participants meeting acute medication overuse criteria over 12 weeks. Atogepant improved PRO measures. Similar results were observed in the subgroup without acute medication overuse. Atogepant was effective in participants with CM, with and without acute medication overuse, as evidenced by reductions in mean MMDs, MHDs, and acute medication use days; reductions in the proportion of participants meeting acute medication overuse criteria; and improvements in PROs. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03855137. Submitted: February 25, 2019; first patient enrolled: March 11, 2019. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03855137. This study provides Class II evidence that atogepant reduces mean MMDs, MHDs, and monthly acute medication use days in adult patients with or without medication overuse.

Efficacy and safety of candidate biosimilar CT-P41 versus reference denosumab: a double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, Phase 3 trial in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

SummaryThis 78-week (18-month) study conducted in 479 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis evaluated the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of candidate biosimilar CT-P41 relative to US reference denosumab. CT-P41 had equivalent efficacy and pharmacodynamics to US-denosumab, with similar pharmacokinetics and comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles. PurposeTo demonstrate equivalence of candidate biosimilar CT-P41 and US reference denosumab (US-denosumab) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. MethodsThis 78-week (18-month), double-blind, randomized, active-controlled Phase 3 study (NCT04757376) comprised two treatment periods (TPs). In TPI, patients (N = 479) were randomized 1:1 to 60 mg subcutaneous CT-P41 or US-denosumab. At Week 52, those who had received CT-P41 in TPI continued to do so. Those who had received US-denosumab were randomized (1:1) to continue treatment or switch to CT-P41 in TPII. The primary efficacy endpoint was percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density at Week 52. Efficacy equivalence was concluded if associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for least squares (LS) mean group differences fell within ± 1.503%. The primary pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoint was area under the effect curve for serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen through the first 26 weeks, with an equivalence margin of 80–125% (for 95% CIs associated with geometric LS mean ratios). ResultsEquivalence was demonstrated for CT-P41 and US-denosumab with respect to primary efficacy (LS mean difference [95% CI]: − 0.139 [− 0.826, 0.548] in the full analysis set and − 0.280 [− 0.973, 0.414] in the per-protocol set) and PD (geometric LS mean ratio [95% CI]: 94.94 [90.75, 99.32]) endpoints. Secondary efficacy, PD, pharmacokinetics, and safety results were comparable among all groups up to Week 78, including after transitioning to CT-P41 from US-denosumab. ConclusionsCT-P41 was equivalent to US-denosumab in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, with respect to primary efficacy and PD endpoints.

Tricaprilin (CER-0001) for the preventive treatment of migraine: A phase 2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study

BackgroundIncreasing evidence indicates a metabolic etiology for migraines, with ketosis potentially rectifying metabolic and clinical features. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate CER-0001, a ketogenic agent, for migraine prevention without dietary changes. MethodsThis was a 2-part, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study conducted in Australia. Adults with at least a 1-year history of migraine and ≥ 1 prior preventive treatment failure were randomised to either oral CER-0001 (up to 30 g twice a day) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was Month 3 change in Migraine Headache Days from baseline. ResultsPart 1 results are presented. 81 participants were randomised and dosed (n = 40 CER-0001, n = 41 placebo), and 61 participants had evaluable efficacy data. No statistically significant difference was observed in the primary endpoint (LSMean difference 0.92 days; p = 0.586). During Month 2, a mean improvement of −2.8 days was observed for CER-0001 (p = 0.056). Withdrawal rates were 45.0% and 53.7% (CER-0001; placebo). The proportion of participants reporting at least one treatment-emergent adverse event was similar between arms (90.0% CER-0001, 82.9% placebo), mostly gastrointestinal (85.0% CER-0001, 70.7% placebo). ConclusionResults suggest positive directional promise over 2–3 months for CER-0001. A new formulation will be used for larger, fully powered phase 2/3 studies. Trial registrationThis study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04437199).

ISIS 449884 Injection Add-On to Metformin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Clinical Study.

ISIS 449884, a 2'-O-methoxyethyl antisense oligonucleotide that targets the glucagon receptor (GCGR), has demonstrated an ability to reduce hepatic glucose output and lower the blood glucose level. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of ISIS 449884 as an add-on to metformin in a population of Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This was a multicenter, placebo-controlled (2:1), randomized, double-blind, parallel-enrollment, multiple-dose phase II study in Chinese patients with T2DM. A total of 90 patients who were uncontrolled by stable metformin monotherapy were randomized into three cohorts. Thirty subjects were enrolled in each cohort and received injections of ISIS 449884 (50mg or 60mg weekly or 100mg every other week) or a corresponding volume of placebo (0.25mL and 0.3mL weekly or 0.5mL every other week) subcutaneously in a 2:1 ratio for 16weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was analyzed in 88 subjects (ISIS 449884, n = 59; placebo, n = 29). The corrected LS mean change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at week 17 in the pooled ISIS 449884 treatment group was -1.31% (95% CI -1.66%, -0.96%), and that in the pooled placebo group was 0.15% (95% CI -0.37%, 0.66%). The LS mean difference between the two groups was -1.46% (95% CI -1.92%, -1.00%, P < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 53/60 subjects (88.3%) and 25/30 subjects (83.3%) in the pooled ISIS 449884 treatment group and the pooled placebo group, respectively, with similar incidences. Drug-related TEAEs occurred in 41/60 subjects (68.3%) and 9/30 subjects (30.0%), respectively. TEAEs of grade 3 or higher occurred in 5/60 (8.3%) subjects and 2/30 (6.7%) subjects, respectively, and none of them were drug related. The ISIS 449884 injection add-on to metformin significantly reduced HbA1c in patients with T2DM uncontrolled by stable metformin monotherapy and showed an acceptable benefit/risk profile. www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn , CTR20191096.

Body Fit With a Pouching System With Concave Contour for People With an Outward Peristomal Body Profile: Effects on Leakage, Wear Time, and Quality of Life: A Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Trial.

The purpose of the study was to investigate the fit of a two-piece pouching system with a concave-shaped skin barrier on people with an outward peristomal body profile and its effect on leakage, wear time, and quality of life (QoL) related to using an ostomy product. Randomized, controlled, open-label, cross-over trial. The sample comprised 53 subjects with outward peristomal body profiles and problems with leakage of ostomy effluent from their pouching system. Participants were randomized to the concave two-piece pouching system or a comparator (two-piece pouching system with a flat skin barrier) for 3 weeks. Subjects were then crossed over to the opposite skin barrier for an additional 3 weeks. The study was conducted in Denmark, Norway, Germany, and the Netherlands; data were collected in multiple ambulatory clinics or during home visits. The primary end point was the ability of the skin barrier to fit body contours; secondary outcomes were leakage of effluent from the pouching system, wear time, and QoL related to using an ostomy product via the validated Ostomy-Q questionnaire. Primary comparisons between concave and comparator pouching systems were evaluated using proportional odds models and mixed models taking test period into account. Analysis included randomized subjects who had been exposed to at least one product and with information on at least one end point (full-analysis-set, n =52). The concave pouching system provided a better fit to body contours than the comparator (P<.001) and reduced the degree of leakage underneath the skin barrier (LS mean difference=-1.84, 95% CI -3.31 to -0.37; P =.016). Participants experienced fewer episodes of leakage outside the skin barrier when using concave versus comparator pouching system (13.0% vs. 26.7%, respectively). Participants reported significant improvements in QoL (LS mean difference=14.3; 95% CI 9.4 to 19.2; P <.001). No significant difference in wear time between skin barrier shapes was reported. Study findings indicate that a pouching system with a concave skin barrier achieved a better body fit on people with an outward peristomal body profile and resulted in fewer leakage incidents and higher QoL compared to using a pouching system with a flat skin barrier.

Eosinophil Depletion with Benralizumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BackgroundBenralizumab is an eosinophil-depleting anti–interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody. The efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis are unclear.MethodsIn a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients 12 to 65 years of age with symptomatic and histologically active eosinophilic esophagitis in a 1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous benralizumab (30 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks. The two primary efficacy end points were histologic response (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field) and the change from baseline in the score on the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ; range, 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating more frequent or severe dysphagia) at week 24.ResultsA total of 211 patients underwent randomization: 104 were assigned to receive benralizumab, and 107 were assigned to receive placebo. At week 24, more patients had a histologic response with benralizumab than with placebo (87.4% vs. 6.5%; difference, 80.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72.9 to 88.8; P<0.001). However, the change from baseline in the DSQ score did not differ significantly between the two groups (difference in least-squares means, 3.0 points; 95% CI, –1.4 to 7.4; P=0.18). There was no substantial between-group difference in the change from baseline in the Eosinophilic Esophagitis Endoscopic Reference Score, which reflects endoscopic abnormalities. Adverse events were reported in 64.1% of the patients in the benralizumab group and in 61.7% of those in the placebo group. No patients discontinued the trial because of adverse events.ConclusionsIn this trial involving patients 12 to 65 years of age with eosinophilic esophagitis, a histologic response (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field) occurred in significantly more patients in the benralizumab group than in the placebo group. However, treatment with benralizumab did not result in fewer or less severe dysphagia symptoms than placebo. (Funded by AstraZeneca; MESSINA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04543409.)

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of SCD411 and reference aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

To compare the efficacy and safety of the proposed aflibercept biosimilar SCD411 and reference aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, this randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted in 14 countries from 13 August 2020 to 8 September 2022. Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. With subfoveal, juxtafoveal, or extrafoveal choroidal neovascularization were aged 50 years or older. Intravitreal injection of SCD411 or aflibercept (2.0 mg) were administered every 4 weeks for the first three injections and every 8 weeks until week 48. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to week 8 with an adjusted equivalence margin of ± 3.0 letters. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SCD411 (n = 288) or reference aflibercept (n = 288). A total of 566 participants (98.3%) completed week 8 of the study. The least-squares mean difference of change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to week 8 (SCD411—aflibercept) was − 0.4 letters (90% confidence interval = − 1.6 to 0.9). The incidence of ocular (69 of 287 [24.0%] vs. 71 of 286 [24.8%]) and serious ocular (5 of 287 [1.7%] vs. 3 of 286 [1.0%]) treatment-emergent adverse effects were similar between the SCD411 and aflibercept groups. Immunogenicity analysis revealed a low incidence of neutralizing antibody formation in both groups. In conclusion, SCD411 has equivalent efficacy compared with reference aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and has a comparable safety profile. The results support the potential use of SCD411 for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Plasma pTau181 Predicts Clinical Progression in a Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial of the 11β-HSD1 Inhibitor Xanamem® for Mild Alzheimer's Disease.

Blood biomarkers are proposed as a diagnostic alternative to amyloid PET or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Relatively little is known of the natural history of patients identified by different blood biomarkers. To identify patients with elevated plasma phosphorylated tau (pTau)181 from a prior Phase 2a trial, and explore the natural histories of their clinical progression, and potential efficacy of Xanamem, a selective inhibitor of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) in these patients. A prespecified, double-blind analysis was conducted in 72 participants with clinically diagnosed AD and available plasma samples from baseline and Week 12 of the "XanADu" Phase 2a trial of Xanamem versus placebo. The analysis prespecified plasma pTau181 > median to identify patients more likely to have AD ("H", > 6.74 pg/mL, n = 34). Cohen's d (d) of≥0.2 defined potential clinical significance. In the placebo group, H patients showed greater clinical progression compared to L patients (pTau181≤median) on ADCOMS (d = 0.55, p < 0.001), CDR-SB (d = 0.63, p < 0.001), MMSE (d = 0.52, p = 0.12), and ADAS-Cog14 (d = 0.53, p = 0.19). In H patients, a potentially clinically meaningful Xanamem treatment effect compared to placebo was seen in the CDR-SB (LS mean difference 0.6 units, d = 0.41, p = 0.09) and Neuropsychological Test Battery (NTB; LS mean difference 1.8 units, d = 0.26, p = 0.48) but not ADCOMS or ADAS-Cog14. This trial demonstrates that elevated plasma pTau181 identifies participants more likely to have progressive AD and is a suitable method for enrichment in AD clinical trials. Xanamem treatment showed evidence of potential clinically meaningful benefits.

The efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs: The Soli-D randomized controlled trial.

To compare the efficacy and safety of a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) with premixed insulin, insulin degludec plus insulin aspart (IDegAsp), in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) suboptimally controlled with oral antidiabetic drug(s) (OADs). In Soli-D, a 24-week, multicentre, open-label, study, insulin-naïve adults were randomized 1:1 to once-daily injections of iGlarLixi (n = 291) or IDegAsp (n = 291), with continued metformin ± sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority in HbA1c change from baseline to week 24. Key secondary endpoints included superiority in HbA1c change and body weight (BW) change at week 24. Hypoglycaemia rates were also assessed. At week 24, iGlarLixi showed non-inferiority and superiority over IDegAsp in HbA1c reduction (least squares [LS] mean difference: -0.20 [95% confidence interval {CI}: -0.33, -0.07]; P < .001 for non-inferiority; [97.5% CI: -0.35, -0.05]; P = .003 for superiority). iGlarLixi decreased BW and IDegAsp increased BW from baseline to week 24, with a statistically significant LS mean difference of -1.49 kg in favour of iGlarLixi (97.5% CI: -2.32, -0.66; P < .001). Event rates (per person-year) for American Diabetes Association (ADA) Level 1, 2 or 3 hypoglycaemia were lower for iGlarLixi (1.90) versus IDegAsp (2.72) (relative risk: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.98). No ADA Level 3 hypoglycaemia or unexpected safety findings were reported. In Chinese people with T2D suboptimally controlled with OADs, once-daily iGlarLixi provided better glycaemic control with BW benefit and lower hypoglycaemia event rates versus IDegAsp.

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled 14-Week Study of Mirogabalin in Chinese Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.

There is no approved effective drug for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) in China. Gabapentinoids including mirogabalin have shown promise, although data in Chinese patients are scarce. This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin for treating DPNP in China. Mirogabalin was administered at 5mg twice daily for the first week and uptitrated to 15mg twice daily for a total duration of 14weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in weekly average daily pain score (ADPS) at week 14; secondary endpoints included the ADPS responder rate, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire visual analogue scale score, patient global impression of change (PGIC), average daily sleep interference score (ADSIS), EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L), and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Of 393 patients (mirogabalin, n = 196; placebo n = 197), the mean age was 58.2years (mirogabalin, 58.7years; placebo, 57.7years) and 54.2% were male (mirogabalin, 56.1%; placebo, 52.3%). Mirogabalin elicited a greater change from baseline in the weekly ADPS vs. placebo at week 14: least-squares mean difference (95% confidence interval) vs. placebo - 0.39 (- 0.74, - 0.04), p = 0.0301. PGIC, ADSIS, and EQ-5D-5L data reflected significantly better improvements for patients receiving mirogabalin vs. placebo. The incidence of TEAEs was 75.0% and 75.1% in the mirogabalin and placebo groups, respectively. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate, and the incidence of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation was 2.6% in the mirogabalin group and 1.5% in the placebo group. Although the effect size of mirogabalin was reduced due to the placebo effect, mirogabalin is a safe and effective treatment option for Chinese patients with DPNP. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04094662.

Efficacy and Safety of LX9211 for Relief of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (RELIEF-DPN 1): Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study.

To evaluate the efficacy of LX9211 in reducing pain related to diabetic peripheral neuropathy. In this double-blind, multicenter, proof-of-concept trial, 319 individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) were randomized (1:1:1) to LX9211 10 mg (n = 106), LX9211 20 mg (n = 106), or matching placebo (n = 107), administered once daily for 6 weeks. DPNP was rated daily with an 11-point numerical rating scale. The primary end point was change from baseline to week 6 in the average daily pain score. The difference between each LX9211 group and placebo was evaluated with mixed-model repeated-measures analysis. For those on low-dose LX9211 the primary efficacy end point was achieved: -1.39 vs. -0.72 points for placebo, least squares mean (SE) difference -0.67 (0.249), 95% CI -1.16 to -0.18, P = 0.007; results for high-dose LX9211 demonstrated improvement in pain severity versus placebo (-1.27 vs. -0.72 points, respectively), but the between-group LS mean difference did not reach the prespecified statistical significance (-0.55 [0.254], 95% CI -1.06 to -0.05, P = 0.030). Treatment benefit was observed beginning at week 1 and maintained thereafter. Results for LX9211 also demonstrated improvement in several patient-reported secondary outcomes. Most common adverse events (AEs) were dizziness, nausea, and headache. More participants treated with LX9211 (20 mg, n = 28 [26.4%]; 10 mg, 17 [16.0%]) than placebo (3 [2.8%]) discontinued study drug prematurely due to AEs; serious AEs were uncommon (2 [1.9%], 0, and 1 [0.9%], respectively). These preliminary findings of improvement in DPNP with LX9211 support further investigation in larger trials.

Low-dose ondansetron: A candidate prospective precision medicine to treat alcohol use disorder endophenotypes

BackgroundAlcohol use disorder (AUD) is among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and over 95 million people live with alcohol dependence globally. The estimated heritability of AUD is 50–60 %, and multiple genes are thought to contribute to various endophenotypes of the disease. Previous clinical trials support a precision medicine approach using ondansetron (AD04, a 5-HT3 antagonist) by segregating AUD populations by the bio-genetic endophenotype of specific serotonergic genotypes and the bio-psychosocial endophenotype of the severity of drinking or both. By targeting the modulation of biogenetic signaling within the biopsychosocial context of AUD, low-dose AD04 holds promise in reducing alcohol consumption among affected individuals while minimizing adverse effects. MethodsThis was a phase III, 6-month, 25-site, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial using AD04 to treat DSM-V–categorized AUD individuals who were pre-stratified into the endophenotypes of heavy or very heavy drinking individuals and possessed a pre-defined profile of genetic variants related to the serotonin transporter and serotonin-3AB receptor. Participants (N = 303) presented moderate to severe AUD, >80 % were men, mostly in their fifties, and >95 % were of European descent. Low-dose AD04 (approx. 033 mg twice daily) or a matching placebo was administered twice daily for 6 months. Brief Behavioral Compliance Enhancement Treatment (BBCET [53]) was administered every two weeks to enhance medication compliance and clinic attendance. ResultsThere was a significant reduction in the monthly percentage of heavy drinking days, PHDD (-46·7 % (2·7 %), 95 %CI: -52·1 % to -41·2 % vs. -38·1 % (2·9 %), 95 %CI: -43·8 % to -32·5 %, respectively; LS mean difference=-8·5 %; p = 0.03) among AD04-treated vs. placebo-receiving heavy drinking individuals at month 6. Heavy drinking individuals were also less likely to be diagnosed with AUD [Month 1: -32·0 % (2·8 %), 95 %CI: -37·5 % to -26·5 % vs. -23·2 % (2·9 %), 95 %CI: -28·9 to -17·5 %; LS mean difference= -8·8 %; p = 0·026)], and improved on the WHO quality of life BREF scale with a significant effect for at least a 1-level downward shift (OR = 3.4; 95 % CI: 1·03–11·45, p = 0·044). Importantly, heavy drinking individuals, as distinct from very heavy drinking individuals, were the bio-psychosocial endophenotype more predictive of therapeutic response to AD04. AD04 had an exceptional safety and tolerability profile, like the placebo's. ConclusionsIn this Phase 3 clinical trial, AD04 was shown to be a promising treatment for currently drinking heavy drinking individuals with AUD who also possess a specific genotypic profile in the serotonin transporter and serotonin-3AB receptor complex. Using AD04 to reduce the harm of AUD in heavy drinking individuals who are currently drinking, without the necessity of abstinence or detoxification from alcohol use, is an important advance in the field of precision medicine. AD04’s adverse events profile, which was like placebo, should enhance accessibility and acceptance of modern medical treatment for AUD by lowering the incorrect but commonly perceived stigma of personal failure.

A comprehensive approach to lifestyle intervention based on a calorie-restricted diet ameliorates liver fat in overweight/obese patients with NAFLD: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in China

BackgroundNonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a globally increasing health epidemic. Lifestyle intervention is recommended as the main therapy for NAFLD. However, the optimal approach is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a comprehensive approach of intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) concerning enhanced control of calorie-restricted diet (CRD), exercise, and personalized nutrition counseling on liver steatosis and extrahepatic metabolic status in Chinese overweight and obese patients with NAFLD.MethodsThis study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted across seven hospitals in China. It involved 226 participants with a body mass index (BMI) above 25. These participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the ILI group, which followed a low carbohydrate, high protein CRD combined with exercise and intensive counseling from a dietitian, and a control group, which adhered to a balanced CRD along with exercise and standard counseling. The main measure of the study was the change in the fat attenuation parameter (FAP) from the start of the study to week 12, analyzed within the per-protocol set. Secondary measures included changes in BMI, liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and the improvement of various metabolic indexes. Additionally, predetermined subgroup analyses of the FAP were conducted based on variables like gender, age, BMI, ethnicity, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension.ResultsA total of 167 participants completed the whole study. Compared to the control group, ILI participants achieved a significant reduction in FAP (LS mean difference, 16.07 [95% CI: 8.90–23.25] dB/m) and BMI (LS mean difference, 1.46 [95% CI: 1.09–1.82] kg/m2) but not in LSM improvement (LS mean difference, 0.20 [95% CI: -0.19–0.59] kPa). The ILI also substantially improved other secondary outcomes (including ALT, AST, GGT, body fat mass, muscle mass and skeletal muscle mass, triglyceride, fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, blood pressure, and homocysteine). Further subgroup analyses showed that ILI, rather than control intervention, led to more significant FAP reduction, especially in patients with concurrent hypertension (p < 0.001).ConclusionIn this RCT, a 12-week intensive lifestyle intervention program led to significant improvements in liver steatosis and other metabolic indicators in overweight and obese Chinese patients suffering from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Further research is required to confirm the long-term advantages and practicality of this approach.Trial registrationThis clinical trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT03972631) in June 2019.

Efficacy and Safety of Ongericimab in Chinese Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and Mixed Dyslipidemia.

A phase 3 trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ongericimab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, as an add-on treatment to optimized lipid-lowering therapy in Chinese patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia. A total of 806 patients who were receiving stable and optimized lipid-lowering therapy but did not achieve their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 2:1:2:1 ratio to receive either ongericimab 150 mg or matching placebo every 2 weeks, or ongericimab 300 mg or matching placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in 802 patients who received at least 1 dose of ongericimab or placebo. The primary end point was the percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24. Our findings demonstrated that the least-squares mean difference of percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 was -67.7% (95% CI, -72.5% to -63.0%; P<0.0001) in the ongericimab 150 mg every 2 weeks group compared with the placebo every 2 weeks group, and -61.2% (95% CI, -67.1% to -55.2%; P<0.0001) in the ongericimab 300 mg every 4 weeks group compared with the placebo every 4 weeks group. These reductions were sustained up to week 52. Furthermore, treatment with ongericimab favorably altered other lipid parameters. A similar incidence of adverse events was observed in the ongericimab and placebo groups. Ongericimab, as an add-on treatment to optimized lipid-lowering therapy, significantly reduced LDL-C and was well-tolerated in Chinese patients with primary hyperlipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia who did not achieve their LDL-C targets. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04781114.

Phase 3 Trial of Crinecerfont in Pediatric Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia

BackgroundChildren with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency require treatment with glucocorticoids, usually at supraphysiologic doses, to address cortisol insufficiency and reduce excess adrenal androgens. However, such treatment confers a predisposition to glucocorticoid-related complications. In 2-week phase 2 trials, patients with CAH who received crinecerfont, a new oral corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor antagonist, had decreases in androstenedione levels.MethodsIn this phase 3, multinational, randomized trial, we assigned pediatric participants with CAH, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive crinecerfont or placebo for 28 weeks. A stable glucocorticoid dose was maintained for 4 weeks, and the dose was then adjusted to a target of 8.0 to 10.0 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day (hydrocortisone dose equivalents), provided that the androstenedione level was controlled (≤120% of the baseline level or within the reference range). The primary efficacy end point was the change in the androstenedione level from baseline to week 4. A key secondary end point was the percent change in the glucocorticoid dose from baseline to week 28 while androstenedione control was maintained.ResultsA total of 103 participants underwent randomization, of whom 69 were assigned to crinecerfont and 34 to placebo; 100 (97%) remained in the trial at 28 weeks. At baseline, the mean glucocorticoid dose was 16.4 mg per square meter per day, and the mean androstenedione level was 431 ng per deciliter (15.0 nmol/liter). At week 4, androstenedione was substantially reduced in the crinecerfont group (−197 ng per deciliter [−6.9 nmol/liter]) but increased in the placebo group (71 ng per deciliter [2.5 nmol/liter]) (least-squares mean difference [LSMD], −268 ng per deciliter [−9.3 nmol/liter]; P<0.001); the observed mean androstenedione value, obtained before the morning glucocorticoid dose, was 208 ng per deciliter (7.3 nmol/liter) in the crinecerfont group, as compared with 545 ng per deciliter (19.0 nmol/liter) in the placebo group. At week 28, the mean glucocorticoid dose had decreased (while androstenedione control was maintained) by 18.0% with crinecerfont but increased by 5.6% with placebo (LSMD, −23.5 percentage points; P<0.001). Headache, pyrexia, and vomiting were the most common adverse events.ConclusionsIn this phase 3 trial, crinecerfont was superior to placebo in reducing elevated androstenedione levels in pediatric participants with CAH and was also associated with a decrease in the glucocorticoid dose from supraphysiologic to physiologic levels while androstenedione control was maintained. (Funded by Neurocrine Biosciences; CAHtalyst Pediatric ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04806451.)

Phase 3 Trial of Crinecerfont in Adult Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia

BackgroundAdrenal insufficiency in patients with classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is treated with glucocorticoid replacement therapy. Control of adrenal-derived androgen excess usually requires supraphysiologic glucocorticoid dosing, which predisposes patients to glucocorticoid-related complications. Crinecerfont, an oral corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor antagonist, lowered androstenedione levels in phase 2 trials involving patients with CAH.MethodsIn this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with CAH in a 2:1 ratio to receive crinecerfont or placebo for 24 weeks. Glucocorticoid treatment was maintained at a stable level for 4 weeks to evaluate androstenedione values, followed by glucocorticoid dose reduction and optimization over 20 weeks to achieve the lowest glucocorticoid dose that maintained androstenedione control (≤120% of the baseline value or within the reference range). The primary efficacy end point was the percent change in the daily glucocorticoid dose from baseline to week 24 with maintenance of androstenedione control.ResultsAll 182 patients who underwent randomization (122 to the crinecerfont group and 60 to the placebo group) were included in the 24-week analysis, with imputation of missing values; 176 patients (97%) remained in the trial at week 24. The mean glucocorticoid dose at baseline was 17.6 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day of hydrocortisone equivalents; the mean androstenedione level was elevated at 620 ng per deciliter. At week 24, the change in the glucocorticoid dose (with androstenedione control) was −27.3% in the crinecerfont group and −10.3% in the placebo group (least-squares mean difference, −17.0 percentage points; P<0.001). A physiologic glucocorticoid dose (with androstenedione control) was reported in 63% of the patients in the crinecerfont group and in 18% in the placebo group (P<0.001). At week 4, androstenedione levels decreased with crinecerfont (−299 ng per deciliter) but increased with placebo (45.5 ng per deciliter) (least-squares mean difference, −345 ng per deciliter; P<0.001). Fatigue and headache were the most common adverse events in the two trial groups.ConclusionsAmong patients with CAH, the use of crinecerfont resulted in a greater decrease from baseline in the mean daily glucocorticoid dose, including a reduction to the physiologic range, than placebo following evaluation of adrenal androgen levels. (Funded by Neurocrine Biosciences; CAHtalyst ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04490915.)