SUMMARY Providing certain precautions are taken, there is no reason why the general trend towards abdominal delivery in high-risk pregnancies, or when difficult vaginal delivery is anticipated, should not continue. As part of a planned delivery programme, caesarean section might also become more frequently indicated for social reasons and for convenience of medical staff. At the present time, the risks to the mother associated with anaesthesia, especially acid aspiration and caval compression, preclude the adoption of such a policy, but with advances in anaesthesiology, the employment of more purely obstetric anaesthetists, and the increasing use of epidural analgesia, these risks might be drastically reduced. Similarly, if the delivery of a premature infant can be avoided (by careful assessment of maturity), and liquor is aspirated from the infant’s oropharynx during delivery, risks to the fetus of abdominal delivery might be drastically reduced also. Post-operative maternal morbidity following elective caesarean section might be reduced if epidural analgesia were employed more often, if a transverse lower abdominal incision were used routinely, and if traditional ideas such as indwelling catheters during operation were abandoned. We have discussed in the first part on the Operation the fact that more women are requesting sterilisation after their second or third delivery. In other words, women are more concerned now with quality rather than quantity in childbirth. If maternal and fetal risks can be eliminated, elective abdominal delivery for the above reasons might come to be regarded as sensible, with sterilisation being performed at the second or third deliveries, and it may well be that during the next 40 years the allowing of a vaginal delivery or attempted vaginal delivery may need to be justified in each particular instance. Perhaps it is not altogether too provocative to suggest that vaginal delivery may yet become the exception rather than the rule