Lower Risk Of Adverse Outcomes Research Articles

#853 Kidney-protective medication and risk of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: preliminary findings from DISCOVER CKD

Abstract Background and Aims Renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (RASi) have been a foundational therapy in chronic kidney disease (CKD) for several decades. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have also emerged as a critical disease-modifying therapy in CKD, with contemporary data from trials showing SGLT2i to significantly improve kidney and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with or without diabetes. Nonetheless, several studies have revealed sub-optimal prescribing of RASi and/or SGLT2i therapy (both herein referred to as kidney-protective medication) in patients with CKD. Using prospective data from the DISCOVER CKD study, we conducted an exploratory analysis to assess the association of kidney-protective medication real-world use with mortality risk, CV events (fatal and non-fatal), and hospitalisation in patients with CKD. Method DISCOVER CKD (NCT04034992) is a multi-country, non-interventional cohort study designed to characterise the epidemiology of CKD, including describing patient characteristics, disease progression, clinical outcomes, patient journey, practice patterns, and clinical management. In the prospective phase, patients with CKD were recruited from the UK, USA, Spain, Italy, Sweden and Japan between September 2019 and June 2022. Clinical data were extracted manually from patients’ health records into a standardised case report form. The current analysis includes 12 months’ follow-up data. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the risk of all-cause mortality and CV events and a negative binomial regression model was used to compare the risk of all-cause hospitalisation between patients receiving and not receiving kidney-protective medication at baseline, with adjustments for age, sex, CKD stage, diabetes mellitus, hyperkalaemia, and heart failure. DISCOVER CKD received research ethics board approval, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Results Of the 1052 patients enrolled in DISCOVER CKD, 643 (61.1%) were receiving kidney-protective medication in the form of RASi (n = 618) and SGLT2i (n = 147) at baseline. The mean age of participants receiving and not receiving kidney-protective medication was 62.4 years and 62.7 years, respectively; 34.4% and 40.8%, respectively, were female. Most patients had CKD stage 3A (n = 332, 31.6%) or 3B (n = 308, 29.3%), and 8.4% (n = 88) had ongoing dialysis. Body mass index (30.4 vs 29.4 kg/m2) and blood pressure were similar for those receiving kidney-protective medication versus those who were not. Laboratory assessments were also generally similar, although estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; 40.9 vs 33.7 mL/min/1.73 m2) and haemoglobin (132.0 g/L vs 124.0 g/L) were higher in patients receiving kidney-protective medication versus those not. During the follow-up, patients receiving kidney-protective medication had a 67% lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12–0.80, p = 0.019), and a 20% lower risk of all-cause hospitalisation (HR, 0.80; 95% CI 0.64–0.99, p = 0.042) compared with patients not receiving kidney-protective medication. In the population without pre-existing CV disease, a trend towards a lower rate of CV events was observed in patients with kidney-protective medication (CV events rates: 2.2 vs 3.2 per 100 person-years; HR, 0.38; 95% CI 0.12–1.08, p = 0.074 (Figure). Conclusion In this multinational CKD cohort, preliminary analysis indicates that using kidney-protective medication was associated with lower risks of adverse outcomes including death. Further analysis to mitigate potential confounding will be performed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Acute patients discharged without an established diagnosis: risk of mortality and readmission of nonspecific diagnoses compared to disease-specific diagnoses.

Nonspecific discharge diagnoses after acute hospital courses represent patients discharged without an established cause of their complaints. These patients should have a low risk of adverse outcomes as serious conditions should have been ruled out. We aimed to investigate the mortality and readmissions following nonspecific discharge diagnoses compared to disease-specific diagnoses and assessed different nonspecific subgroups. Register-based cohort study including hospital courses beginning in emergency departments across 3 regions of Denmark during March 2019-February 2020. We identified nonspecific diagnoses from the R- and Z03-chapter in the ICD-10 classification and excluded injuries, among others-remaining diagnoses were considered disease-specific. Outcomes were 30-day mortality and readmission, the groups were compared by Cox regression hazard ratios (HR), unadjusted and adjusted for socioeconomics, comorbidity, administrative information and laboratory results. We stratified into short (3-<12h) or lengthier (12-168h) hospital courses. We included 192,185 hospital courses where nonspecific discharge diagnoses accounted for 50.7% of short and 25.9% of lengthier discharges. The cumulative risk of mortality for nonspecific vs. disease-specific discharge diagnoses was 0.6% (0.6-0.7%) vs. 0.8% (0.7-0.9%) after short and 1.6% (1.5-1.7%) vs. 2.6% (2.5-2.7%) after lengthier courses with adjusted HRs of 0.97 (0.83-1.13) and 0.94 (0.85-1.05), respectively. The cumulative risk of readmission for nonspecific vs. disease-specific discharge diagnoses was 7.3% (7.1-7.5%) vs. 8.4% (8.2-8.6%) after short and 11.1% (10.8-11.5%) vs. 13.7% (13.4-13.9%) after lengthier courses with adjusted HRs of 0.94 (0.90-0.98) and 0.95 (0.91-0.99), respectively. We identified 50 clinical subgroups of nonspecific diagnoses, of which Abdominal pain (n = 12,462; 17.1%) and Chest pain (n = 9,599; 13.1%) were the most frequent. The subgroups described differences in characteristics with mean age 41.9 to 80.8 years and mean length of stay 7.1 to 59.5h, and outcomes with < 0.2-8.1% risk of 30-day mortality and 3.5-22.6% risk of 30-day readmission. In unadjusted analyses, nonspecific diagnoses had a lower risk of mortality and readmission than disease-specific diagnoses but had a similar risk after adjustments. We identified 509 clinical subgroups of nonspecific diagnoses with vastly different characteristics and prognosis.

Real-world evaluation of an algorithmic machine-learning-guided testing approach in stable chest pain: a multinational, multicohort study.

An algorithmic strategy for anatomical vs. functional testing in suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) (Anatomical vs. Stress teSting decIsion Support Tool; ASSIST) is associated with better outcomes than random selection. However, in the real world, this decision is rarely random. We explored the agreement between a provider-driven vs. simulated algorithmic approach to cardiac testing and its association with outcomes across multinational cohorts. In two cohorts of functional vs. anatomical testing in a US hospital health system [Yale; 2013-2023; n = 130 196 (97.0%) vs. n = 4020 (3.0%), respectively], and the UK Biobank [n = 3320 (85.1%) vs. n = 581 (14.9%), respectively], we examined outcomes stratified by agreement between the real-world and ASSIST-recommended strategies. Younger age, female sex, Black race, and diabetes history were independently associated with lower odds of ASSIST-aligned testing. Over a median of 4.9 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.4-7.1) and 5.4 (IQR: 2.6-8.8) years, referral to the ASSIST-recommended strategy was associated with a lower risk of acute myocardial infarction or death (hazard ratioadjusted: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.85, P < 0.001 and 0.74 [95% CI 0.60-0.90], P = 0.003, respectively), an effect that remained significant across years, test types, and risk profiles. In post hoc analyses of anatomical-first testing in the Prospective Multicentre Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial, alignment with ASSIST was independently associated with a 17% and 30% higher risk of detecting CAD in any vessel or the left main artery/proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, respectively. In cohorts where historical practices largely favour functional testing, alignment with an algorithmic approach to cardiac testing defined by ASSIST was associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes. This highlights the potential utility of a data-driven approach in the diagnostic management of CAD.

Twenty-four-hour blood pressure trajectories and clinical outcomes in patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke

ObjectiveThe management of blood pressure (BP) in acute ischaemic stroke remains a subject of controversy. This investigation aimed to explore the relationship between 24-hour BP patterns following ischaemic stroke and...

Higher Dietary Quercetin Intake Is Associated with Lower Risk of Adverse Outcomes among Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a Prospective Cohort Study

BackgroundCumulative preclinical evidence reported quercetin, a major flavonoid, can attenuate the disease activity of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, there is limited evidence that supports the benefits of quercetin for patients with IBD. ObjectivesTo investigate whether dietary quercetin intake is associated with adverse outcomes among individuals with IBD in a prospective cohort study. MethodsWe included 2293 participants with IBD (764 Crohn’s disease [CD] and 1529 ulcerative colitis [UC]) from the UK Biobank. Dietary information was collected using validated 24-h dietary assessments, and quercetin intake was estimated based on national nutrient databases. Two outcomes, enterotomy and all-cause mortality, were obtained based on the national data. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsAfter a mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 9.6 (1.8) y, we documented 193 enterotomy events and 176 deaths. Compared with participants with the lowest quartile intake of quercetin, those in the highest quartiles were associated with lower risk of enterotomy (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.76) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.83) in IBD. The inverse associations between quercetin and enterotomy were consistent in CD (HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.78) but not UC (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.32, 1.07), while the inverse associations between quercetin and mortality were consistent both in CD (HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.92) and UC (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.95). ConclusionsHigher dietary intake of quercetin was associated with lower risk of enterotomy and all-cause mortality in IBD. Our study provides novel evidence that further suggests the benefits of quercetin for patients with IBD, while also calling for further validation in other cohorts and clinical trials.

The optimal antithrombotic strategy for post-stroke patients with atrial fibrillation and extracranial artery stenosis—a nationwide cohort study

BackgroundIn post-stroke atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who have indications for both oral anticoagulant (OAC) and antiplatelet agent (AP), e.g., those with carotid artery stenosis, there is debate over the best antithrombotic strategy. We aimed to compare the risks of ischemic stroke, composite of ischemic stroke/major bleeding and composite of ischemic stroke/intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) between different antithrombotic strategies.MethodsThis study included post-stroke AF patients with and without extracranial artery stenosis (ECAS) (n = 6390 and 28,093, respectively) identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Risks of clinical outcomes and net clinical benefit (NCB) with different antithrombotic strategies were compared to AP alone.ResultsThe risk of recurrent ischemic stroke was higher for patients with ECAS than those without (12.72%/yr versus 10.60/yr; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.104, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.052–1.158, p < 0.001). For patients with ECAS, when compared to AP only, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) monotherapy was associated with lower risks for ischaemic stroke (aHR 0.551, 95% CI 0.454—0.669), the composite of ischaemic stroke/major bleeding (aHR 0.626, 95% CI 0.529—0.741) and the composite of ischaemic stroke/ICH (aHR 0.577, 95% CI 0.478—0.697), with non-significant difference for major bleeding and ICH. When compared to AP only, warfarin monotherapy was associated with higher risks of major bleeding (aHR 1.521, 95% CI 1.231—1.880), ICH (aHR 2.045, 95% CI 1.329—3.148), and the composite of ischaemic stroke and major bleeding. With combination of AP plus warfarin, there was an increase in ischaemic stroke, major bleeding, and the composite outcomes, when compared to AP only. NOAC monotherapy was the only approach associated with a positive NCB, while all other options (warfarin, combination of AP-OAC) were associated with negative NCB.ConclusionsFor post-stroke AF patients with ECAS, NOAC monotherapy was associated with lower risks of adverse outcomes and a positive NCB. Combination of AP with NOAC or warfarin did not offer any benefit, but more bleeding especially with AP-warfarin combination therapy.

Liver resection versus ablation in geriatric populations - Does one method impart improved in-hospital mortality?

Objective: This study aimed to compare surgical resection versus ablation for managing liver malignancies in patients 65 and older. Material and Methods: Cases with liver tumors were extracted from the NSQIP database for patients aged ≥65 years. Following propensity score matching, multivariate Cox regression was used for 30-day morbidity and mortality for liver resection and ablation. Results: Following a propensity score matching, 1048 patients were 1:1 matched for comorbid conditions. Patients stayed in the hospital three days longer after resection (p&lt;0.001). Mortality was lower after ablation (p= 0.013). This difference was more prominent in patients with primary liver tumors (p= 0.008). Group A had a 10-fold lower risk of developing an abdominal abscess, a fourfold decrease in hospital-associated pneumonia (p= 0.001) and reintubation, a 10-fold reduction in bleeding requiring transfusion (p&lt;0.001), and a three-fold decrease in risk of developing sepsis (p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Despite being a generally sicker patient population with worse underlying liver function, ablative techniques were associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes when compared to more aggressive resection of primary malignant tumors of the liver.

Dermal Regeneration Template in the Management and Reconstruction of Burn Injuries and Complex Wounds: A Review.

Dermal scaffolds have created a paradigm shift for burn and wound management by providing improved healing and less scarring, while improving cosmesis and functionality. Dermal regeneration template (DRT) is a bilayer membrane for dermal regeneration developed by Yannas and Burke in the 1980s. The aim of this review is to summarize clinical evidence for dermal scaffolds focusing on DRT for the management and reconstruction of burn injuries and complex wounds. A comprehensive search of PubMed was performed from the start of indexing through November 2022. Articles reporting on DRT use in patients with burns, limb salvage, and wound reconstruction were included with focus on high-level clinical evidence. DRT has become an established alternative option for the treatment of full-thickness and deep partial-thickness burns, with improved outcomes in areas where cosmesis and functionality are important. In the management of diabetic foot ulcers, use of DRT is associated with high rates of complete wound healing with a low risk of adverse outcomes. DRT has been successfully used in traumatic and surgical wounds, showing particular benefit in deep wounds and in the reconstruction of numerous anatomical sites. Considerable clinical experience has accrued with the use of DRT beyond its original application for thermal injury. A growing body of evidence from clinical studies reports the successful use of DRT to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life across clinical indications at a number of anatomical sites.

The risk of revision is higher following shoulder hemiarthroplasty compared with total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a matched cohort study of 11,556 patients from the National Joint Registry, UK.

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) are used in the management of osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint. We aimed to determine whether TSA or HA resulted in a lower risk of adverse outcomes in patients of all ages with osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff and in a subgroup of patients aged 60 years or younger. Shoulder arthroplasties recorded in the National Joint Registry, UK, between April 1, 2012 and June 30, 2021, were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics in England. Elective TSAs and HAs were matched on propensity scores based on 11 variables. The primary outcome was all-cause revision. Secondary outcomes were combined revision/non-revision reoperations, 30-day inpatient complications, 1-year mortality, and length of stay. 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. 11,556 shoulder arthroplasties were included: 7,641 TSAs, 3,915 HAs. At 8 years 95% (CI 94-96) of TSAs and 91% (CI 90-92) of HAs remained unrevised. The hazard ratio (HR) varied across follow-up: 4-year HR 2.7 (CI 1.9-3.5), 8-year HR 2.0 (CI 0.5-3.5). Rotator cuff insufficiency was the most common revision indication. In patients aged 60 years or younger prosthesis survival at 8 years was 92% (CI 89-94) following TSA and 84% (CI 80-87) following HA. The risk of revision was higher following HA in patients with osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff. Patients aged 60 years and younger had a higher risk of revision following HA.

Trends and Outcomes Associated With Bariatric Surgery and Pharmacotherapies With Weight Loss Effects Among Patients With Heart Failure and Obesity.

Utilization patterns of bariatric surgery among older patients with heart failure (HF), and the associations with cardiovascular outcomes, are not well known. Medicare beneficiaries with HF and at least class II obesity from 2013 to 2020 were identified with Medicare Provider Analysis and Review 100% inpatient files and Medicare 5% outpatient files. Patients who underwent bariatric surgery were matched to controls in a 1:2 ratio (matched on exact age, sex, race, body mass index, HF encounter year, and HF hospitalization rate pre-surgery/matched period). In an exploratory analysis, patients prescribed pharmacotherapies with weight loss effects (semaglutide, liraglutide, naltrexone-bupropion, or orlistat) were identified and matched to controls with a similar strategy in addition to HF medical therapy data. Cox models evaluated associations between weight loss therapies (as a time-varying covariate) and mortality risk and HF hospitalization rate (calculated as the rate of HF hospitalizations following index HF encounter per 100 person-months) during follow-up. Of 298 101 patients with HF and body mass index ≥35 kg/m2, 2594 (0.9%) underwent bariatric surgery (45% men; mean age, 56.2 years; mean body mass index, 51.5 kg/m2). In propensity-matched analyses over a median follow-up of 4.7 years, bariatric surgery was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.49-0.63]; P<0.001), greater reduction in HF hospitalization rate (rate ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.67-0.77]; P<0.001), and lower atrial fibrillation risk (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65-0.93]; P=0.006). Use of pharmacotherapies with weight loss effects was low (4.8%), with 96.3% prescribed GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) agonists (semaglutide, 23.6%; liraglutide, 72.7%). In propensity-matched analysis over a median follow-up of 2.8 years, patients receiving pharmacotherapies with weight loss effects (versus matched controls) had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.71-0.95]; P=0.007) and HF hospitalization rate (rate ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.77-0.99]; P=0.04). Bariatric surgery and pharmacotherapies with weight loss effects are associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes among older patients with HF and obesity; however, overall utilization remains low.

Reduced thoracic skeletal muscle size is associated with adverse outcomes in diabetes patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: quantitative analysis of sarcopenia by using cardiac MRI

BackgroundSarcopenia is frequently found in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and is associated with reduced exercise capacity, poor quality of life and adverse outcomes. Recent evidence suggests that axial thoracic skeletal muscle size could be used as a surrogate to assess sarcopenia in HFrEF. Since diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common comorbidities with HFrEF, we aimed to explore the potential association of axial thoracic skeletal muscle size with left ventricular (LV) remodeling and determine its prognostic significance in this condition.MethodsA total of 243 diabetes patients with HFrEF were included in this study. Bilateral axial thoracic skeletal muscle size was obtained using cardiac MRI. Patients were stratified by the tertiles of axial thoracic skeletal muscle index (SMI). LV structural and functional indices, as well as amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), were measured. The determinants of elevated NT-proBNP were assessed using linear regression analysis. The associations between thoracic SMI and clinical outcomes were assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsPatients in the lowest tertile of thoracic SMI displayed a deterioration in LV systolic strain in three components, together with an increase in LV mass and a heavier burden of myocardial fibrosis (all P < 0.05). Moreover, thoracic SMI (β = -0.25; P < 0.001), rather than body mass index (β = -0.04; P = 0.55), was independently associated with the level of NT-proBNP. The median follow-up duration was 33.6 months (IQR, 20.4–52.8 months). Patients with adverse outcomes showed a lower thoracic SMI (40.1 [34.3, 47.9] cm2/m2 vs. 45.3 [37.3, 55.0] cm2/m2; P < 0.05) but a similar BMI (P = 0.76) compared with those without adverse outcomes. A higher thoracic SMI indicated a lower risk of adverse outcomes (hazard ratio: 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.92–0.99; P = 0.01).ConclusionsWith respect to diabetes patients with HFrEF, thoracic SMI is a novel alternative for evaluating muscle wasting in sarcopenia that can be obtained by a readily available routine cardiac MRI protocol. A reduction in thoracic skeletal muscle size predicts poor outcomes in the context of DM with HFrEF.

Mortality benefit with AF ablation: Impact of normal sinus rhythm seen in CABANA and EAST AFnet.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is significantly associated with morbidity and mortality and erodes the quality and quantity of life. It is standard of care to treat patients with AF and an increased risk of stroke with oral anticoagulation therapy, but the more daunting question many clinicians face is whether to pursue a "rate-only" or "rhythm" control strategy. Historical studies over the years have sought to answer this question but have found no significant difference in major clinical outcomes between the two strategies. There are opportunities based on new data to improve the natural history of the disease. The EAST AFnet trial for the first time revealed a significant morbidity and mortality advantage to rhythm control therapy when performed early in the disease process of AF and in the setting of comprehensive medical management that was maintained. The CABANA trial clearly demonstrated that catheter ablation was a more effective long-term treatment of AF in general and significantly lowers risk of AF progression compared to medical therapy. Like multiple prior trials of rhythm management strategies, when rhythm control was effective in these trials, independent of therapy assignment, there was a significantly lower risk of adverse outcomes and death. These contemporary data provide optimism that the pervasive mortality risk in patients with AF observed over the past 50 years may be improved by the timing, use, and efficacy of use of therapeutic interventions.

Metformin treatment is associated with reduced risk of hypoglycaemia, major adverse cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality in patients with post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus: a nationwide cohort study.

Post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus (PPDM) is a frequent complication of pancreatitis and is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Metformin is recommended for the treatment of PPDM, but evidence of its risk-benefit profile is limited. In a pharmaco-epidemiologic study, we investigated the association between metformin treatment and adverse outcomes in patients with PPDM. In a Danish nationwide population-based cohort study, we included adults (≥18 years) with incident PPDM or type 2 diabetes between 2009 and 2018. Post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus was categorised into acute and chronic subtypes (PPDM-A and PPDM-C). Associations between metformin treatment and severe hypoglycaemia, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and all-cause mortality were examined across the diabetes subgroups using Cox regression analysis. Treatments with metformin, insulin, and other glucose-lowering therapies were handled as time-varying exposures. We included 222 337 individuals with new-onset type 2 diabetes and 3781 with PPDM, of whom 2305 (61%) were classified as PPDM-A and 1476 (39%) as PPDM-C. Treatment with metformin was associated with a lower risk of severe hypoglycaemia (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.62, P < .0001), MACE (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.92, P = .0071), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.49-0.64, P < .0001) in patients with PPDM. In sensitivity analyses and among individuals with type 2 diabetes, metformin treatment exhibited comparable trends of risk reduction. Metformin is associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes, including all-cause mortality in patients with PPDM, supporting the use of metformin as a glucose-lowering therapy for these patients.

External validation of the Oakland Score to assess safe hospital discharge among adult patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in a single New Zealand Centre.

Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common reason for hospital admission. However, the majority resolve spontaneously and only a minority require inpatient intervention. We aimed to describe the epidemiology and aetiology of acute LGIB admissions in our institution. We also aimed to validate the Oakland Score, which can identify patients at low risk of adverse outcome from LGIB, in our population and determine the proportion who could have safely avoided admission. Using the prospective, validated Otago Clinical Audit database (DIVA), we searched for adult patients admitted to Dunedin Hospital with a primary diagnosis of LGIB between January 2013 and December 2020. We retrieved data to calculate the Oakland Score and details of inpatient treatment from the electronic patient record. We excluded patients admitted electively, admissions related to inflammatory bowel disease, and those with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. We identified 761 patients of which 501 met inclusion criteria (56% male, median age 76 years, 82% NZ European). Overall, 72% were managed with observation or diagnostic endoscopy, 32% received blood products, and 7% required haemostatic intervention to control bleeding. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the Oakland Score was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.89). A cut-off score of ≤10 predicted a 95% probability of safely avoiding admission. This equates to saving 30 bed-days annually. The majority of patients admitted with LGIB are managed conservatively. The Oakland Score could be used as a stratification tool to safely reduce the admission rate.

The optimal antithrombotic strategy for post-stroke patients with atrial fibrillation and extracranial artery stenosis - A nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background In post-stroke AF patients with indications for both oral anticoagulants (OACs) and antiplatelet agents (AP), eg. those with carotid artery stenosis, there is debate over the best management strategy. Objectives We aimed to examine outcomes in post-stroke AF patients with extracranial artery stenosis (ECAS). Second, to explore stroke and bleeding outcomes as well as the net clinical benefit (NCB), with OACs (non-vitamin K antagonist OACs [NOACs] or warfarin) and with AP-OAC combination therapy, when compared to AP alone. Methods We performed a nationwide cohort study in post-stroke AF patients with and without ECAS (n=6390 and 28093, respectively). The risks of clinical events and NCB with different antithrombotic strategies were compared to AP alone. Results The risk of recurrent ischemic stroke was higher for patients with ECAS than those without (12.72%/yr versus 10.60/yr; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.104, p&amp;lt;1.001). For patients with ECAS, when compared to AP only, NOAC monotherapy was associated with lower risks for ischaemic stroke (aHR 0.551 [95%CI 0.454-0.669], the composite of ischaemic stroke/major bleeding (aHR 0.577 [95%CI 0.478-0.697]) and the composite of ischaemic stroke/ICH (aHR 0.577 [95%CI 0.478-0.697]), with nonsignificant difference for major bleeding and ICH (Figure). NOAC monotherapy was the only approach associated with a positive NCB, while all other options (warfarin, combination AP-OACs) were associated with negative NCB. Conclusions For post-stroke AF patients with ECAS, NOAC monotherapy was associated with lower risks of adverse outcomes and a positive NCB. Combination of AP with NOAC or warfarin did not offer any benefit, but more bleeding especially with AP-warfarin combination therapy.

Impact of integrated care in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a report from the WARCEF trial

Abstract Background In recent years there has been more and more attention to the concept of ‘integrated care’ for patients with cardiovascular diseases. Integrated care strategies have been thought to provide comprehensive evaluation and management of patients characterized by complex chronic conditions and high prevalence of comorbidities. Purpose To propose and evaluate an integrated care management for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods We performed a secondary analysis of the WARCEF trial, which randomized HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm at baseline to Warfarin and Aspirin. We propose the ABC-HF as a strategy of integrated care management. ABC-HF stands on three pillars: i) Adherence to Guideline-Directed-Medical-Therapy, defined as ACE inhibitors/ARBs plus Beta-Blockers plus MRAs; ii) Better symptom control, defined as NYHA category I-II; iii) Comorbidities optimisation, as per guideline-directed management of hypertension, previous myocardial infarction, previous stroke, peripheral vascular disease, (incident) atrial fibrillation, etc. Patients were managed adherent to the ABC-HF strategy if all the three conditions were fulfilled. Main outcome was the composite of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, all-cause death. Results A total of 2,264 patients were available for analysis (mean [SD] age 60.8 [11.4] years, 450 [19.9%] females). Overall, 254 (11.2%) patients were managed adherent to ABC-HF: 199 (8.8%) adherent to no criteria; 905 (40.0%) to one criterion; and 906 (40.0%) to two criteria. Over a mean (SD) follow-up of 3.55 (1.78) years there were 602 (26.6%) events. Patients managed adherent to ABC-HF reported a lower rate of composite outcome compared to those non-adherent (16.1% vs. 27.9%, p&amp;lt;0.001). A Cox multivariate regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, ejection fraction, randomized treatment, and Minnesota physical domain score showed that clinical management adherent to ABC-HF was associated with a reduction in the risk of the primary composite outcome (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.76). A progressively higher number of ABC-HF criteria fulfilled was associated with a progressively lower risk [Figure 1]. Conclusion In a cohort of HFrEF with severe ventricular dysfunction, adherence to ABC-HF, as an integrated care management for HF patients, is associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes. Higher numbers of ABC-HF criteria fulfilled is associated with a progressively lower risk.ABC-HF Criteria and Risk of Composite Ou

Abstract 18565: Statin Utilization and Outcomes Among Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization

Background: Patients undergoing coronary revascularization are at high risk for adverse health outcomes. Accordingly, current guidelines suggest high-intensity use of statin intervention therapy to help mitigate atherosclerotic risk. We analyzed outcomes of patients following coronary revascularization stratified by the level of statin intervention in a large, real-world integrated healthcare system. Methods: Patients were stratified by type of coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)). Statin use was divided as: (1) no statin, (2) less than guideline-directed statin intensity (&lt;GDSI), and GDSI. HRs and incidence rate per 1000-person years were assessed for secondary ASCVD outcomes (MI, ischemic stroke/TIA and all-cause death) in the population. Results: Over a mean follow up of about 5 years, a total of 33,513 patients underwent PCI and 12,436 underwent CABG. Over 35% of patients in both groups received either &lt;GDSI or no statin therapy. Patients who underwent PCI and were given no statin treatment had higher incidence of MI (69 vs 23 per 1000PY), stroke (21 vs 10) and death (69 vs 30) than those on GDSI. Patients who underwent CABG and were given no statin treatment had higher incidence of MI (31 vs 15 per 1000PY), stroke (30 vs 13) and death (79 vs 20) than those on GDSI. Amongst both groups, adjusted analysis showed that patients receiving GDSI had significantly lower risk for all major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (Table). In particular, GDSI in patients undergoing PCI was associated with the most significant reduction in MI, with an HR of 0.42. Conclusions: Underuse of GDSI was highly prevalent in patients undergoing coronary vascularization, both for PCI and CABG, and this was associated with suboptimal outcomes. Further practical interventions should be studied to assure that patients are treated aggressively with guideline directed therapies to lower risk for adverse outcomes.

Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in twin- and singleton-born women: An inter-generational cohort study.

To compare the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes between twin-born and singleton-born women. We also evaluated whether in utero exposure to pre-eclampsia or preterm delivery affected adverse pregnancy outcomes in women's own pregnancies. Population-based cohort study. Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1967-2020. 9184 twin-born and 492 894 singleton-born women during 1967-2005, with their later pregnancies registered during 1981-2020. Data from an individual's birth were linked to their later pregnancies. We used generalised linear models with log link binomial distribution to obtain exponentiated regression coefficients that estimated relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between twin- or singleton-born women and later adverse pregnancy outcomes. Pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery or perinatal loss in twin-born compared with singleton-born women. There was no increased risk for adverse outcomes in twin-born compared with singleton-born women: adjusted RRs for pre-eclampsia were 1.00 (95% CI 0.93-1.09), for preterm delivery 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-1.02) and for perinatal loss 1.00 (95% CI 0.84-1.18). Compared with singleton-born women exposed to pre-eclampsia in utero, twin-born women exposed to pre-eclampsia had lower risk of adverse outcomes in their own pregnancies; the aRR for pre-eclampsia was 0.73 (95% CI 0.58-0.91) and for preterm delivery was 0.71 (95% CI 0.56-0.90). Compared with preterm singleton-born women, preterm twin-born women did not differ in terms of risk of pre-eclampsia (aRR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92-1.21) or perinatal loss (aRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.71-1.37) and had reduced risk of preterm delivery (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.94). Twin-born women did not differ from singleton-born women in terms of risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Twin-born women exposed to pre-eclampsia in utero, had a lower risk of pre-eclampsia and preterm delivery compared with singleton-born women exposed to pre-eclampsia.

Outcomes and Medical Therapy in Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCAs) is a disease that has been poorly characterized with unclear clinical and therapeutic outcomes. The association of medical therapy with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with MINOCA has been inadequately assessed. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the association of MINOCA at risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes as compared with myocardial infarction with coronary artery disease (MICAD) and the efficacy of medical therapy in reducing the risk of adverse outcomes. A literature search was conducted for studies reporting on the association of MINOCA at risk of adverse outcomes as compared with MICAD. A literature search was also conducted for studies reporting on the association of medical therapy at risk of adverse outcomes in patients with MINOCA. A total of 29 studies with 893,134 participants met inclusion criteria comparing MINOCA to MICAD. Patients with MINOCA had a significantly lower risk of adverse outcomes as compared with MICAD. Nine studies with 27,731 MINOCA patients met inclusion criteria for evaluating the utility of medical therapy. Medical therapy did not significantly reduce risk of MACE; however, there was a trend toward lower risk in patients treated with β blockers. In conclusion, our results suggest that MINOCA is associated with a lower risk of in-hospital and long-term adverse outcomes compared with MICAD. Standard medical therapy is not associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with MINOCA. Additional high-quality studies are required to evaluate the utility of specific medication classes for the treatment of specific etiologies of MINOCA.

946 A Complete Cycle Audit of the Appropriate Management of Stable Patients Presenting Acutely with a Lower GI Bleed Using the Oakland Score Risk Stratification Tool in Order to Avoid Unnecessary Admissions

Abstract Aim The use of risk stratification tools such as the Oakland Score (OS) to identify patients with low risk of adverse outcomes (scale 0-35, safe discharge threshold ≤8) who present acutely with a Lower Gastrointestinal Bleed (LGIB) in order to avoid unnecessary admissions, in accordance with British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidance. Method At a District General Hospital, data was collected retrospectively over six months. Patients who acutely presented with a LGIB were identified using patient handover lists and e-documentation was reviewed for a documented Oakland Score (OS). A departmental survey was conducted to ascertain knowledge of OS and LGIB assessment. Tailored teaching was subsequently delivered, including a summary sheet with a link to an e-calculator. A re-audit was conducted over three months to measure change of practice. Results Prior to intervention, 6/63 (10%) had a documented Oakland score (OS). Three patients had an OS &amp;lt;8 and were inappropriately admitted. A survey was completed by 11 members of the General Surgical team. Prior to intervention, 27% (3/11) were aware of OS and only 9% (1/11) reported using it practice. Following intervention, 16/38 (42%) had a documented OS. All patients (8/8) with an OS ≤8 were appropriately discharged. Conclusions The use of numerical risk stratification tools such as the Oakland Score, in compliance with BSG guidance, improved patient management and avoidance of inappropriate admissions. Targeted educative measures should be delivered to the department on a regular basis, to account for continual rotating of doctors and ensuring updated knowledge to further improve outcomes.