Abstract
To compare the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes between twin-born and singleton-born women. We also evaluated whether in utero exposure to pre-eclampsia or preterm delivery affected adverse pregnancy outcomes in women's own pregnancies. Population-based cohort study. Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1967-2020. 9184 twin-born and 492 894 singleton-born women during 1967-2005, with their later pregnancies registered during 1981-2020. Data from an individual's birth were linked to their later pregnancies. We used generalised linear models with log link binomial distribution to obtain exponentiated regression coefficients that estimated relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between twin- or singleton-born women and later adverse pregnancy outcomes. Pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery or perinatal loss in twin-born compared with singleton-born women. There was no increased risk for adverse outcomes in twin-born compared with singleton-born women: adjusted RRs for pre-eclampsia were 1.00 (95% CI 0.93-1.09), for preterm delivery 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-1.02) and for perinatal loss 1.00 (95% CI 0.84-1.18). Compared with singleton-born women exposed to pre-eclampsia in utero, twin-born women exposed to pre-eclampsia had lower risk of adverse outcomes in their own pregnancies; the aRR for pre-eclampsia was 0.73 (95% CI 0.58-0.91) and for preterm delivery was 0.71 (95% CI 0.56-0.90). Compared with preterm singleton-born women, preterm twin-born women did not differ in terms of risk of pre-eclampsia (aRR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92-1.21) or perinatal loss (aRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.71-1.37) and had reduced risk of preterm delivery (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.94). Twin-born women did not differ from singleton-born women in terms of risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Twin-born women exposed to pre-eclampsia in utero, had a lower risk of pre-eclampsia and preterm delivery compared with singleton-born women exposed to pre-eclampsia.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
