P143 Purpose: The treatment time window for stroke is narrow. Little is known about patients′ knowledge of stroke, their beliefs, their recognition of warning symptoms, and how these factors affect the time of hospital presentation. Methods: A prospective interview of consecutive patients admitted with acute stroke was conducted over an 8-week period. Data recorded included demographic information, history of previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), the patient′s knowledge of stroke, recognition of warning symptoms and risk factors, and the delay from symptom onset to hospital arrival. Early arrival was defined as within 6 hours of symptom onset. Statistical comparisons were made using two-tailed student′s t test, Mann-Whitney U test, or Fisher′s exact test, depending on the nature of the data. Results: The patients′ general knowledge of stroke was fair, and early arrival was seen in 40 (56.3%) of 71 patients. Early presentation was associated with male sex (P=0.028) and a lower initial Glasgow coma scale score (P=0.072) but not with age, a better general knowledge of stroke, a previous history of stroke or TIA, Rankin score upon discharge, and level of education. On the other hand, late presentation was associated with a belief in permanent disability (P=0.056). Of 29 patients who claimed to know about stroke, 22 (75.9%) correctly described about stroke. The stroke warning symptoms were recognized by 45.1 to 76.1% of patients, whereas the recognition of individual risk factor was correct in 36.6 to 76.1% of patients. Conclusions: Early arrival was seen in a good proportion of stroke patients in Hong Kong. Nevertheless, our results suggest that improving the general knowledge of stroke among Hong Kong people may not reduce delay in hospital presentation of stroke patients. (Supported by the CRCG Research Grant 10202658 of the University of Hong Kong)
Read full abstract