Lower Extremity Revascularization Procedures Research Articles

Arm vein conduit is superior to composite prosthetic-autogenous grafts in lower extremity revascularization

Various alternative conduits have been used for lower extremity revascularization when an adequate ipsilateral greater saphenous vein is absent. This study compared the effectiveness of all-autogenous multisegment arm vein bypass grafts with that of composite grafts composed of combined prosthetic and autogenous conduits. One hundred fifty-three lower extremity revascularization procedures performed between 1990 and 1998 were followed up prospectively using a computerized vascular registry. The grafts were composed of spliced arm vein segments with venovenostomy in 122 and of composite prosthetic-autogenous conduit in 31. Arm vein conduit was prepared by means of intraoperative angioscopy for valve lysis and identification of luminal abnormalities in 47.7% of cases. Bypass graft configurations were as follows: femoropopliteal (12 arm vein, 2 composite); femorotibial (75 arm vein, 23 composite); femoropedal (14 arm vein, 6 composite), and popliteo-tibial/pedal (21 arm vein, 0 composite). The indication for surgery was limb salvage in 98% and disabling claudication in 2% of cases. The mean follow-up was 25.1 months (range, 1 month to 7.9 years). Overall survival at 4 years was 51%. Overall patency and limb salvage rates were as follows: primary patency, at 1 year-arm vein, 76.9% +/- 4.8%; composite, 59. 5% +/- 9.6% (P =.02); at 3 years-arm vein, 70.0% +/- 8.0%; composite, 43.7% +/- 12.4% (P <.01); and at 5 years-arm vein, 53.8% +/- 8.7%; composite, 0%; secondary patency, at 1 year-arm vein, 77.5% +/- 4. 6%; composite, 59.8% +/- 9.5% (P =.02); at 3 years-arm vein, 70.7% +/- 7.5%, composite, 44.9% +/- 13.1% (P <.01); at 5 years-arm vein, 57.7% +/- 8.0%; composite, 0%; limb salvage, at 1 year-arm vein, 89. 3% +/- 3.7%; composite, 73.9% +/- 8.9% (P <.01); at 3 years-arm vein, 80.5% +/- 7.0%; composite, 49.6% +/- 14.3% (P <.01); at 5 years-arm vein, 76.3% +/- 9.9%; composite, 0%. In this study, multisegment autogenous arm vein was used successfully in a wide variety of lower extremity revascularization procedures and achieved good long-term patency and limb salvage rates, well in excess of those achieved with composite prosthetic-autogenous grafts. The use of autogenous conduit appears to offer superior results to composite conduit in lower extremity revascularization. The superior durability of arm vein makes it one of the alternative conduits of choice when an adequate greater saphenous vein is not available.

The use of arm vein in lower-extremity revascularization: Results of 520 procedures performed in eight years

Purpose: The absence of an adequate ipsilateral saphenous vein in patients requiring lower-extremity revascularization poses a difficult clinical dilemma. This study examined the results of the use of autogenous arm vein bypass grafts in these patients. Methods: Five hundred twenty lower-extremity revascularization procedures performed between 1990 and 1998 were followed prospectively with a computerized vascular registry. The arm vein conduit was prepared by using intraoperative angioscopy for valve lysis and identification of luminal abnormalities in 44.8% of cases. Results: Seventy-two (13.8%) femoropopliteal, 174 (33.5%) femorotibial, 29 (5.6%) femoropedal, 101 (19.4%) popliteo-tibial/pedal, and 144 (27.7%) extension “jump” graft bypass procedures were performed for limb salvage (98.2%) or disabling claudication (1.8%). The average age of patients was 68.5 years (range, 32 to 91 years); 63.1% of patients were men, and 36.9% of patients were women. Eighty-five percent of patients had diabetes mellitus, and 77% of patients had a recent history of smoking. The grafts were composed of a single arm vein segment in 363 cases (69.8%) and of spliced composite vein with venovenostomy in 157 cases (30.2%). The mean follow-up period was 24.9 months (range, 1 month to 7.4 years). Overall patency and limb salvage rates for all graft types were: primary patency, 30-day = 97.0% ± 0.7%, 1-year = 80.2% ± 2.1%, 3-year = 68.9% ± 3.6%, 5-year = 54.5% ± 6.6%; secondary patency, 30-day = 97.0% ± 0.7%, 1-year = 80.7% ± 2.1%, 3-year = 70.3% ± 3.4%, 5-year = 57.5% ± 6.2%; limb salvage, 30-day = 97.6% ± 0.7%, 1-year = 89.8% ± 1.7%, 3-year = 82.1% ± 3.3%, 5-year = 71.5% ± 6.9%. Secondary patency and limb salvage rates were greatest at 5 years for femoropopliteal grafts (69.8% ± 12.8%, 80.7% ± 11.8%), as compared with femorotibial (59.6% ± 10.3%, 72.7% ± 10.5%), femoropedal (54.9% ± 25.7%, 56.8% ± 26.9%,) and popliteo-tibial/pedal grafts (39.0% ± 7.3%, 47.6% ± 15.4%). The patency rate of composite vein grafts was equal to that of single-vein conduits. The overall survival rate was 54% at 4 years. Conclusion: Autogenous arm vein has been used successfully in a wide variety of lower-extremity revascularization procedures and has achieved excellent long- and short-term patency and limb salvage rates, higher than those generally reported for prosthetic or cryopreserved grafts. Its durability and easy accessibility make it an alternative conduit of choice when an adequate saphenous vein is not available. (J Vasc Surg 2000;31:50-9.)

Functional status and walking ability after lower extremity bypass grafting or angioplasty for intermittent claudication: Results from a prospective outcomes study

Objective: The purpose of this study was the prospective comparison of functional outcomes after lower extremity bypass grafting surgery, angioplasty, or medical management of intermittent claudication. Methods: The study was designed as a prospective cohort study to compare functional outcomes for patients with interventional management to medical management, including a matched (younger, with more disability) subgroup, followed for a mean of 19 months. Sixteen Chicago-area vascular surgery clinics participated in the study. The subjects were consecutively enrolled patients with an abnormal ankle-brachial blood pressure index (ABI), without signs of rest pain, ulcer, or gangrene, and without prior lower extremity revascularization procedures. The main outcome measures were changes in physical functioning, community walking distance, bodily pain, leg symptoms, and ABI. Results: Of the 526 study patients, 20% underwent revascularization procedures (60 surgical bypass grafting and 44 angioplasty only). The mean ABI improved significantly for the patients who underwent bypass grafting surgery (0.20; P < .001) and modestly for the patients who underwent angioplasty (0.09; P < .05). Patients undergoing bypass grafting and angioplasty maintained highly significant ( P < .001) improvements in mean physical functioning, (17%, 14%), bodily pain (18%, 13%), and walking distance (28%, 27%) scores and reported greater leg symptom improvement. The results were far superior for the patients with greater improvement in ABI. The conditions of the 277 unmatched patients who underwent medical management declined on all outcome measures, and the conditions of the 145 matched patients who underwent medical management improved 5% ( P < .001) on walking distance score. Eighteen percent of the study patients failed to complete the full study follow-up period. Conclusion: Most of the functional improvement achieved by patients who underwent interventional management appears to be related to improved patency rather than to selection bias or placebo effects. The functional gains were approximately half those often reported for patients for hip arthroplasty and similar to patients who undergo elective coronary angioplasty. (J Vasc Surg 2000;31:93-103.)

The progressive nature of peripheral arterial disease in young adults: A prospective analysis of white men referred to a vascular surgery service

Objective: The onset of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease at a young age (premature PAD) has been associated with rapid progression, bypass graft failure, and amputation. This study was performed to document the incidence of these complications and to determine the risk factors for poor outcome in patients with premature PAD. Methods: This study was designed as a prospective longitudinal analysis, with patients who were ambulatory or hospitalized at a single vascular referral institution. The subjects were 51 white men with onset of PAD symptoms before the age of 45 years (mean age of onset, 41 ± 0.5 years) and represented consecutive patients who were seen at the vascular surgery service during a 4-year period. Thirty of the study subjects (58%) were recruited during the first 2 years. The main outcome measures were number and type of lower extremity revascularization procedures or amputations that were necessitated during the follow-up period. Results: During a mean follow-up period of 73 ± 6 months, 15 patients (29%) had PAD that remained stable without interventions and 15 (29%) had PAD that remained stable for a mean of 76 ± 13 months after a single intervention. Twenty-one patients (41%) required multiple operations or major amputations. In a comparison of the 30 PAD patients whose conditions were stable with or without a single intervention with the 21 PAD patients who required multiple interventions (REDO), there were no differences in smoking, hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemias. The REDO group had a younger mean age at the onset of symptoms (39 ± 1 years vs 43 ± 2 years; P < .001). At entry, the REDO patients had a higher prevalence of infrainguinal or multilevel disease (57% vs 20%; P = .03), a lower mean ankle brachial index (0.44 ± 0.04 vs 0.56 ± 0.03; P = .02), and more frequent tissue loss (24% vs 0; P = .005). The REDO patients had a higher mean lipoprotein (a) level than did the patients with stable conditions (51 ± 11 mg/dL vs 27 ± 5 mg/dL; P = .03), but there were no significant differences in the mean plasma homocysteine levels (19 ± 2 μmol/L vs 16 ± 1 μmol/L) or in the proportion of patients with hypercoagulable states (33% vs 30%). The only predictive variables that were selected with stepwise logistic regression analysis were age at onset ( P < .002; odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 1.81) and ankle brachial index of less than 0.5 ( P < .008; odds ratio, 6.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 27.3). Conclusion: Although 60% of the white men with premature PAD who were referred to a vascular surgery service had conditions that appeared to remain stable, these data show that approximately 40% of the patients will require multiple interventions because of disease progression or bypass graft failure. Clinical indicators, not serum markers, are predictors of poor outcome in patients with premature PAD. The results of this study suggest that patients with onset of PAD before the age of 43 years who have objective evidence of advanced disease are predisposed to multiple interventions. (J Vasc Surg 1999;30:436-45.)

Long-term functional status and quality of life after lower extremity revascularization

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the longer term (up to 7 years) functional status and quality of life outcomes from lower extremity revascularization. Methods: This study was designed as a cross-sectional telephone survey and chart review at the University of Minnesota Hospital. The subjects were patients who underwent their first lower extremity revascularization procedure or a primary amputation for vascular disease between January 1, 1989, and January 31, 1995, who had granted consent or had died. The main outcome measures were ability to walk, SF-36 physical function, SF-12, subsequent amputation, and death. Results: The medical records for all 329 subjects were reviewed after the qualifying procedures for details of the primary procedure (62.6% arterial bypass graft, 36.8% angioplasty, 0.6% atherectomy), comorbidities (64% diabetics), severity of disease, and other vascular risk factors. All 166 patients who were living were surveyed by telephone between June and August 1996. At 7 years after the qualifying procedure, 73% of the patients who were alive still had the qualifying limb, although 63% of the patients had died. Overall, at the time of the follow-up examination (1 to 7.5 years after the qualifying procedure), 65% of the patients who were living were able to walk independently and 43% had little or no limitation in walking several blocks. In a multiple regression model, patients with diabetes and patients who were older were less likely to be able to walk at follow-up examination and had a worse functional status on the SF-36 and a lower physical health on the SF-12. Number of years since the procedure was not a predictor in any of the analyses. Conclusion: Although the long-term mortality rate is high in the population that undergoes lower limb revascularization, the survivors are likely to retain their limb over time and have good functional status. (J Vasc Surg 1999;29:395-402.)

Duplex ultrasound scanning defines operative strategies for patients with limb-threatening ischemia

Purpose: To characterize the accuracy of color-flow duplex ultrasound (DUS) in planning lower extremity revascularization procedures, we prospectively compared operations predicted by means of DUS arterial scanning (DUSAS) and operations predicted by means of conventional angiography (CA) with actual operations performed in 36 patients undergoing 40 vascular reconstructions for critical (grade II/III) lower extremity ischemia. Methods: All patients were examined with lower extremity DUSAS followed by CA. DUSAS was performed from the aorta to the pedal vessels of the affected extremity. Adequacy of inflow was assessed, and the best distal target vessel with continuous, unobstructed flow was defined. An operative prediction was made and recorded based upon the DUSAS findings, and in a blinded fashion, based upon subsequent CA. The McNemar test for comparing correlated proportions was applied to test for the statistical significance of the difference ( P < .05) between correct operations predicted by DUSAS and CA. Results: Of the actual operations performed, 83% were correctly predicted by means of DUSAS (95% CI; range, 77% to 89%). Seven operations were incorrectly predicted with DUSAS. Of the actual operations performed, 90% were correctly predicted by means of CA (95% CI; range, 81% to 99%). Four operations were incorrectly predicted with CA. The McNemar test determined that the difference between correct operations predicted by means of DUSAS and correct operations predicted by means of CA was not statistically significant ( P = .50). Conclusions: With few exceptions, DUSAS can be used to reliably predict infrainguinal reconstruction strategies. Vessels defined as adequate with DUSAS are rarely unfit for bypass. Prospective investigation of lower extremity revascularization based solely upon DUSAS is warranted. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:482-91.)

Balloon angioplasty by vascular surgeons

Endovascular treatment of arterial disease of the lower extremity is performed by radiologists, cardiologists, and some vascular surgeons. This retrospective review was performed to measure complications and success rates in patients with extensive occlusive disease treated by vascular surgeons. Balloon angioplasties were performed on 336 vascular segments as a part of 239 lower extremity revascularization procedures in 200 patients between April 1990, and May 1996. Immediate technical success was determined by completion angiography, measurement of pressure gradients, or ankle brachial indices (ABI) within 30 days. Late technical success was determined by duplex imaging or ABI. Late clinical success was defined as relief of presenting symptoms. Indications for intervention included claudication (51%), limb threat (45%), and failing grafts (4%). Sixty-one percent of the endovascular procedures were performed open, and 39% were percutaneously performed. Stents were utilized at 17% of the angioplasty sites. Procedures involved angioplasty of multiple arterial sites in 117 cases (55%), angioplasty combined with open surgical bypass (endarterectomy or thrombectomy) in 65 cases (19%), and a combination of surgery with a second angioplasty in 43 (13%). Complications occurred in 9 cases (3%). There were 2 deaths within 30 days (0.5%). Immediate technical success was 93% (140 of 151) for all aortoiliac segments, 88% (75 of 85) for femoral segments, 92% (54 of 59) for popliteal, and 84% (21 of 25) for tibials. The late technical success was 81% (118 of 145) for aortoiliac segments, 67% (55 of 82) for femoral, 73% (41 of 56) for the popliteals, and 75% (18 of 24) for the tibial segments. These data demonstrate that balloon angioplasty can be performed effectively by vascular surgeons with a low complication rate in a population of patients where limb salvage was a significant indication for the procedure, and treatment often required the correction of multilevel disease.

Delay in Improvement of Ankle-Arm Index and Ankle Waveforms after Lower-Extremity Revascularization

Ankle-arm index (AAI) and pulse volume recording (PVR) are commonly used in the early postoperative period to measure the outcome after lower-extremity revascularization. They are also used in addition to duplex scan for long-term follow-up of these patients. We noticed that in some patients the AAI and/or PVR after revascularization procedures did not improve immediately after surgery, but took 24 hours or longer to do so. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 47 patients who underwent various lower-extremity revascularization procedures and found that out of 20 patients who had AAI and/or PVR measured in the recovery room, 8 patients took 24 hours and 1 patient took more than 24 hours for maximal improvement of their AAI and/or PVR. This may be related to vascular spasm, and knowledge of this delayed improvement is important in preventing errors during follow-up.

Prospective study of the value of prebypass saphenous vein angioscopy

Background: The patency of a saphenous vein graft is directly related to the quality of the vein harvested. Thus, appropriate evaluation of the vein before implanting it as a bypass graft may help identify those veins at high risk for early failure. Accordingly, we prospectively investigated whether prebypass angioscopic assessment of the saphenous vein could identify those vein grafts at particularly high risk of early failure. Patients and methods: Thirty-two greater saphenous veins with a grossly normal appearance were evaluated angioscopically before their use as a bypass conduit. After modification of abnormal segments, all of the veins irrigated well and were used as bypass grafts. Results: Twenty-four patients were available for follow-up at 12 months. Seventeen (71%) had been prospectively classified as having angioscopically normal saphenous veins, while 7 were identified as having abnormal veins. The two groups did not differ significantly in demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, or indications for operative intervention. Twelve of the 17 (70%) normal veins were patent at 1 year; however, only 1 (14%) of the angioscopically abnormal vein grafts remained patent for 12 months (chi-square = 4.27; P = 0.039). Conclusion: Angioscopic inspection of the saphenous vein, before insertion as a graft, allows for identification of unrecognized venous disease that portends early graft thrombosis. Exclusion of abnormal veins, based on an abnormal angioscopic appearance, may lead to improved results for lower-extremity revascularization procedures; this supports the value of vein-graft angioscopy.

Experience with a new valvulotome for lower-extremity revascularization procedures by the in situ method

Between November 1990 and November 1992, 50 consecutive cases requiring lower-extremity revascularization by the in situ method were compared with regard to use of two different valve cutters, the Hall valvulotome and the Insitucat. There were no amputations in patients with patent grafts, nor were any infections or false aneurysms noted during the course of this study. In the Insitucat group ( n = 25), primary patency was achieved in 19 cases. Five of the six graft failures underwent additional procedures of which three remained patent, adding to the secondary patency rate (22 of 25). The greatest problem with regard to maintaining primary graft patency was that of missed or retained valves, but the incidence of this problem decreased during the course of this study as experience was gained with the catheter in conjunction with angioscopy. Experience with the Insitucat valvulotome has demonstrated its efficacy, though enhanced by monitoring the results with angioscopy. The development and discovery of focal stenotic areas and retained valves by surveillance sonography have resulted in enhanced (assisted) primary graft patency rates. The incidence of these problems appears to be comparable with that occurring with other means of producing valvular incompetence for an in situ reconstruction where valvulotomes of similar design are employed. This was confirmed by comparative analysis with another group of 25 in situ vein bypasses performed during the same time period but during the Hall valvulotome.

Pro: Regional anesthesia is better than general anesthesia for lower extremity revascularization

0 NE OF THE most controversial subjects in anesthesia today is whether or not regional anesthesia (RA) is superior to general anesthesia (GA) in high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery (PVS) may be an ideal population to address this question due to their high incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and coexisting illness (ie, diabetes, chronic obstructive lung disease, renal insufficiency). In addition, patients undergoing lower extremity PVS can elect to have a GA, RA (spinal, epidural) or a combined technique (GA/epidural). Perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) is reported to occur in up to 15% of patients undergoing PVS and accounts for more than 50% of their perioperative mortality.lJ In fact, in one large series, the perioperative myocardial event rate was higher in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization procedures than in patients undergoing surgery that involved crossclamping of the abdominal aorta.3 The merits of both GA and RA for patients with CAD undergoing noncardiac surgery have been previously debated in the PRO and CON sections of this journaL4a5 Currently, there is no uniform preference for one form of anesthesia over another in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization procedures. Each technique has both real and theoretical advantages for high-risk patients undergoing this kind of surgery. Advantages of GA include (1) quick onset, (2) reliability in providing adequate surgical anesthesia, (3) securement of the airway, and (4) avoidance of oversedation or restlessness in the awake patient undergoing a long procedure. General anesthesia, when accompanied by the use of appropriate monitoring techniques and the judicious use of vasoactive agents, can be tailored to meet the physiologic needs of even the most critically ill patients. Heart rate, vascular resistance, and contractility can be adjusted in order to optimize both myocardial oxygen supply and organ perfusion. Potential disadvantages of GA include (1) minimal suppression of the neuroendocrine “stress response,” (2) adverse hemodynamic changes associated with the induction and emergence from GA (ie, tachycardia, hypertension).6s7 Potential advantages of RA include (1) attenuation of the neuroendocrine “stress response,” (2) improvement in cardiac function in patients with ischemic heart disease due to reductions in both preload and afterload, and (3) fewer postoperative pulmonary complications.6,8 Advantages of epidural anesthesia, in particular, include (1) slow titration of local anesthetic agents producing a desired level of blockade, (2) avoidance of rapid fluctuations in either heart rate or blood pressure, (3) the ability to continue epidural

Dobutamine stress echocardiography for assessment of cardiac risk before noncardiac surgery

Two-dimensional echocardiography performed during incremental infusion of dobutamine has been shown to be a safe and accurate method for detection of coronary artery disease in patients who are unable to undergo conventional exercise testing. 1,2 A significant proportion of these patients are referred for evaluation before undergoing noncardiac surgery, such as abdominal aortic aneurysm resection, lower extremity revascularization procedures and hip replacement. Little is known about the value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for assessment of preoperative cardiac risk. This portable and relatively low cost technique provides rapid results and, thus, has potential advantages over alternative technologies, such as dipyridamole thallium scintigraphy, which have established prognostic value. 3–5 This retrospective study reports on the results of dobutamine stress echocardiography performed for preoperative cardiac risk assessment.

The value of silent myocardial ischemia monitoring in the prediction of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery.

Real-time electrocardiographic monitoring for silent myocardial ischemia was performed on 200 patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery to try to better define those at high risk of perioperative myocardial infarction. The patients were divided into those undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm or lower extremity revascularization procedures (group I, n = 120) and those undergoing carotid artery endarterectomy (group II, n = 80). Silent ischemia was detected during the preoperative, intraoperative, or post-operative periods in 60.8% of group I and 67.5% of group II patients. Six group I and three group II patients suffered an acute perioperative myocardial infarction with two cardiac deaths. In both groups I and II a variety of parameters based on monitoring of silent myocardial ischemia were compared between the subgroups of patients who had myocardial infarction and those who did not. The results show that in both groups there was a significantly (p less than or equal to 0.05) greater total duration of perioperative ischemic time, total number of perioperative ischemic episodes, and total duration of perioperative ischemic time as a percent of total monitoring time in patients who suffered a perioperative myocardial infarction compared to those who did not. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of preoperative characteristics in all 200 patients showed the occurrence of preoperative silent myocardial ischemia and angina at rest to be the only significant predictors of perioperative myocardial infarction. Thus perioperative monitoring for silent myocardial ischemia might noninvasively identify those patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery who are at increased risk for perioperative myocardial infarction, permitting implementation of timely preventive measures in selected patients.

The value of silent myocardial ischemia monitoring in the prediction of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery

Real-time electrocardiographic monitoring for silent myocardial ischemia was performed on 200 patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery to try to better define those at high risk of perioperative myocardial infarction. The patients were divided into those undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm or lower extremity revascularization procedures (group I, n = 120) and those undergoing carotid artery endarterectomy (group II, n = 80). Silent ischemia was detected during the preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative periods in 60.8% of group I and 67.5% of group II patients. Six group I and three group II patients suffered an acute perioperative myocardial infarction with two cardiac deaths. In both groups I and II a variety of parameters based on monitoring of silent myocardial ischemia were compared between the subgroups of patients who had myocardial infarction and those who did not. The results show that in both groups there was a significantly (p ≤ 0.05) greater total duration of perioperative ischemic time, total number of perioperative ischemic episodes, and total duration of perioperative ischemic time as a percent of total monitoring time in patients who suffered a perioperative myocardial infarction compared to those who did not. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of preoperative characteristics in all 200 patients showed the occurrence of preoperative silent myocardial ischemia and angina at rest to be the only significant predictors of perioperative myocardial infarction. Thus perioperative monitoring for silent myocardial ischemia might noninvasively identify those patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery who are at increased risk for perioperative myocardial infarction, permitting implementation of timely preventive measures in selected patients.

Microcomputer-based programs for the practicing vascular surgeon

An inexpensive microcomputer system can be programmed in BASIC to provide convenient data storage, retrieval, and analysis for the practicing vascular surgeon. A personalized registry program permits input of key patient data that can be processed and retrieved in list form or groupings with operator control of variables. A second program, in which lower extremity revascularization procedures can be analyzed by various parameters, is described. Results can be obtained in life-table formats with comparative statistical analysis. For the private practitioner of vascular surgery, the use of various computer programs will allow management of information for self-assessment, record keeping, teaching, and publication with great accuracy and at significant cost savings. In addition, word processing can increase secretarial output and efficiency. Office management programs are available but need to be individually investigated to determine their use for a particular practice. The major advantages of the microcomputer for the practicing vascular surgeon are personal control and ready access to data that are easy to store, analyze, and retrieve.

Intraoperative assessment of limb revascularization by Doppler-derived segmental blood pressure measurements

Prompt recognition and correction of technical errors in vascular procedures in the lower extremities decreases patient morbidity and improves the chances for successful revascularization. A simple, versatile technique for intraoperative hemodynamic assessment of lower extremity revascularization procedures is described. Salient features include ability to detect and correct technical errors without reoperation and its associated morbidity, use of commonly available, inexpensive equipment, and ease of performance without involvement of either specifically trained or inexperienced personnel.