Lower Esophageal Sphincter Augmentation Research Articles

Management of paraesophageal hiatus hernia: recommendations following a European expert Delphi consensus

AimsThere is considerable controversy regarding optimal management of patients with paraesophageal hiatus hernia (pHH). This survey aims at identifying recommended strategies for work-up, surgical therapy, and postoperative follow-up using Delphi methodology.MethodsWe conducted a 2-round, 33-question, web-based Delphi survey on perioperative management (preoperative work-up, surgical procedure and follow-up) of non-revisional, elective pHH among European surgeons with expertise in upper-GI. Responses were graded on a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Items from the questionnaire were defined as “recommended” or “discouraged” if positive or negative concordance among participants was > 75%. Items with lower concordance levels were labelled “acceptable” (neither recommended nor discouraged).ResultsSeventy-two surgeons with a median (IQR) experience of 23 (14–30) years from 17 European countries participated (response rate 60%). The annual median (IQR) individual and institutional caseload was 25 (15–36) and 40 (28–60) pHH-surgeries, respectively. After Delphi round 2, “recommended” strategies were defined for preoperative work-up (endoscopy), indication for surgery (typical symptoms and/or chronic anemia), surgical dissection (hernia sac dissection and resection, preservation of the vagal nerves, crural fascia and pleura, resection of retrocardial lipoma) and reconstruction (posterior crurorrhaphy with single stitches, lower esophageal sphincter augmentation (Nissen or Toupet), and postoperative follow-up (contrast radiography). In addition, we identified “discouraged” strategies for preoperative work-up (endosonography), and surgical reconstruction (crurorrhaphy with running sutures, tension-free hiatus repair with mesh only). In contrast, many items from the questionnaire including most details of mesh augmentation (indication, material, shape, placement, and fixation technique) were “acceptable”.ConclusionsThis multinational European Delphi survey represents the first expert-led process to identify recommended strategies for the management of pHH. Our work may be useful in clinical practice to guide the diagnostic process, increase procedural consistency and standardization, and to foster collaborative research.

Comparative Outcomes of Anti-Reflux Surgery in Obese Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease1

IntroductionRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been the preferred operation for obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, some patients are hesitant to undergo bypass. Obese patients have a multifactorial predisposition to GERD, including lower esophageal sphincter (LES) dysfunction and aberrant pressure gradients across their diaphragmatic crura. Among non-obese patients, anti-reflux surgery (ARS) with hiatal hernia (HH) repair and LES augmentation has shown excellent long-term results. We aimed to determine whether patient satisfaction and GERD recurrence differed between obese and non-obese patients who underwent ARS. MethodsReview of patients who underwent ARS between January 2012 and June 2021 was performed. Perioperative and postoperative characteristics were compared across three BMI groups: BMI < 30 kg/m2, 30 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 35 kg/m2, and BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. ResultsFour-hundred thirteen patients were identified, of which 294 (71.1%) had BMI < 30 kg/m2, 87 (21.1%) were 30 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 35 kg/m2, and 32 (7.7%) had a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. Patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 had higher preoperative manometric and EndoFLIP™ intra-balloon pressure at the LES than those with lower BMIs. This value was increased to a similar level throughout ARS across the three cohorts. Post-operative GERD-specific satisfaction was similar across the three cohorts, as were rates of postoperative reflux and hiatal hernia recurrence on barium swallow; rates of reoperation were low. ConclusionsARS with HH repair and LES augmentation may be appropriate for select patients across a range of BMIs, including those with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 who are hesitant to undergo RYGB.

Magnetic Lower Esophageal Sphincter Augmentation (LINX) Is Effective and Safe in Patients with Prior Gastric Surgery — Outcomes in Patients with Prior Bariatric Surgery or Partial Gastrectomy

Magnetic Lower Esophageal Sphincter Augmentation (LINX) Is Effective and Safe in Patients with Prior Gastric Surgery — Outcomes in Patients with Prior Bariatric Surgery or Partial Gastrectomy

Reference high-resolution manometry values after magnetic sphincter augmentation.

BackgroundMagnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is an innovative antireflux procedure that can improve lower esophageal sphincter (LES) competency and reduce symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Some patients report postoperative dysphagia. To date, no studies have described reference high‐resolution manometry (HRM) values after MSA implantation.MethodsHigh‐resolution manometry was performed in patients free of dysphagia after MSA with or without concurrent crura repair. Reference values for all parameters of the Chicago Classification were defined as those between the 5th and 95th percentiles. The contribution of concurrent crura repair to LES competency and to reference values was also analyzed.Key ResultsEighty‐four patients met the study inclusion criteria. The upper limit of normality for integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and intrabolus pressure (IBP) was 20.2 mmHg and 30.3 mmHg, respectively. Both variables were higher after MSA compared to normative Chicago Classification v3.0 values. The Distal Contractile Integral upper limit was in the range of normality. Patients undergoing crura repair had a significantly higher IRP (p = 0.0378) and lower GERDQ‐A scores (p = 0.0374) and Reflux Symptom Index (p = 0.0030) compared to those who underwent MSA device implantation alone.Conclusion & InferencesThis study provides HRM reference values for patients undergoing successful MSA implantation. Crural repair appears to be a key component of LES augmentation and is associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Electrical lower esophageal sphincter augmentation in patients with GERD and severe ineffective esophageal motility\u2014a safety and efficacy study

BackgroundLaparoscopic fundoplication (LF), even if performed in specialized centers, can be followed by long-term side effects such as dysphagia, gas bloating or inability to belch. Patients with an ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and concurrent GERD are prone to postoperative dysphagia after LF. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of electrical lower esophageal sphincter stimulation in patients with IEM and GERD.MethodsThis is a prospective, open-label single center study. Patients with PPI-refractory GERD and ineffective esophageal motility were included for lower esophageal sphincter electrical stimulation (LES-EST). Patients underwent prospective follow-up including physical examination, interrogation of the device and were surveyed for changes in the health-related quality of life score.ResultsAccording to power analysis, 17 patients were included in this study. Median distal contractile integral (DCI) was 64 mmHg s cm (quartiles 11.5–301). Median total % pH < 4 was 8.9 (quartiles 4–21.6). Twelve patients (70.6%) underwent additional hiatal repair. At 1-month follow-up, none of the patients showed any clinical or radiological signs of dysphagia. There were no procedure related severe adverse events. Mean total HQRL improved from baseline 37.53 (SD 15.07) to 10.93 (SD 9.18) at follow-up (FUP) (mean difference 24.0 CI 15.93–32.07) p < 0.001.ConclusionsLES-EST was introduced as a potential technique to avoid side effects of LF. LES-EST significantly improved health related quality of life and does not impair swallowing in patients with GERD and ineffective esophageal motility.

Lower esophageal sphincter augmentation by endoscopic injection of dextranomer hyaluronic acid copolymer in a porcine gastroesophageal reflux disease model

BackgroundWe previously demonstrated feasibility, safety, and a reproducible histologic bulking effect after injection of dextranomer hyaluronic acid copolymer (DxHA) into the gastroesophageal junction of rabbits. In the current study, we investigated the potential for DxHA to augment the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in a porcine model of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). MethodsTwelve Yucatan miniature pigs underwent LES manometry and 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring at baseline, after cardiomyectomy, and 6weeks after randomization to endoscopic injection of either DxHA or saline at the LES. After necropsy, the foregut, including injection sites, was histologically examined. ResultsPigs in both groups had similar weight progression. Cardiomyectomy induced GERD in all animals, as measured by a rise in the median % of time pH <5 from 0.6 to 11.6 (p=0.02). Endoscopic injection of DxHA resulted in a higher median difference in LES length (1.8cm vs. 0.4cm, p=0.03). In comparison with saline injection, DxHA resulted in 120% increase in LES pressure, and 76% decrease in the mean duration of reflux episodes, but these results were not statistically significant. Injection of DxHA induced a foreign body reaction with fibroblasts and giant cells. ConclusionsPorcine cardiomyectomy is a reproducible animal GERD model. Injection of DxHA may augment the LES, offering a potential therapeutic effect in GERD.

A new era

To describe basic principles of tissue engineering with emphasis on the potential role of gastrointestinal endoscopy in regenerative medicine. Stricturing associated with endoscopic submucosal resection and circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection can be prevented through transplantation of autologous epidermal cell sheets or seeded decellularized biological scaffolds. Lower esophageal sphincter augmentation through injection of muscle-derived cells is a novel potential treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Stem cell derived tissue has been used to repair injured colon in a mouse model of colitis. A bioengineered internal anal sphincter has been successfully implanted in mice and showed preserved functionality. The immediate foreseeable application of tissue engineering in gastrointestinal endoscopy is in the field of mucosal repair after acute injury. Tissue regeneration can be achieved through expansion of autologous somatic cells or by induction of multipotent or pluripotent stem cells. Advances in cellular scaffolding have made bioengineering of complex tissues a reality. Tissue engineering in endoscopy is also being pioneered by studies looking at enteral sphincter augmentation and regeneration. The availability of engineered tissue for endoscopic application will increase with advances in cell-culturing techniques.

Motor responses of the esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to vestibular stimulation in man.

Pressure recordings in the esophageal body, LES and stomach were performed in 10 healthy subjects before and after caloric stimulation of the labyrinth. While esophageal and stomach responses varied or were absent, all subjects showed variations at the LES level. Duration of LES relaxation was increased and both time and amplitude of LES augmentation were significantly reduced. The physiological mechanism of labyrinthine-digestive connections and the possibility of clinical applications are discussed.