Abstract Introduction Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is a cornerstone therapy for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Current 3D-navigation technologies used with radiofrequency (RF) ablation allow drastic reduction of X-ray exposure and better anatomical characterization improving acute and long-term procedural results. Cryoballoon ablation (CA) procedures typically rely on conventional fluoroscopy, resulting in significant X-ray exposure. Although contemporary fluoroscopy technologies allow for potential 3D imaging integration, their specific utility in improving procedural guidance during CA remains undefined. Method Using semi-automatic segmentation obtained from pre-procedural cardiac computed tomography, 3D segmentations of the left atrium, including PV, spine and primary bronchi walls were fused on the real-time fluoroscopy acquisitions in three standard positions (AP, LAO, RAO), acquired at the beginning of the procedure (Figure1). We compared procedural characteristics of CA performed with 3D-fusion imaging to conventional fluoroscopy-guided procedures. Results Thirty-six patients (aged 60±13 yo, 85% male) with paroxysmal AF treated with CA were included in the study: 18 in the control group (conventional fluoroscopy) and 18 in the 3D-assisted group. Acute PV isolation was achieved in all patients. The 3D-assisted CA was associated with significantly shorter procedure duration (mean 97.8±15.5 vs 82.1±16.1 min, p=0.0048); left-sided dwelling time (mean 77±15.2 vs 65.1±14.4 min, p=0.0351); and lower X-ray energy delivered to the patient (Dose Area product) with mean 661±373.1 vs 378.1±316.8 cGy*cm2 (p=0.013). Interestingly, we found that 72.2% of 3D guided procedures were done in less than 90min, while 77.8% of conventional cases required more than 90min to be completed (Figure 2D). Conclusion 3D-fusion imaging integration is feasible and allows for an exact PV anatomy depiction on fluoroscopy. Our data illustrates that it might significantly improve CA efficiency (shorter procedure duration) and safety (lower X-ray exposure and left-sided dwelling time). Our approach could also impact long-term results since it might reduce the likeability of missing intermediate PVs. Further research is needed to evaluate the incremental value of 3D imaging in long term efficacy.Figure 1Figure 2