Low-value Practices Research Articles

Economic evaluation of intrahospital clinical practices in injury care: protocol for a 10-year systematic review

IntroductionUnderuse of high-value clinical practices and overuse of low-value practices are major sources of inefficiencies in modern healthcare systems. Injuries are second only to cardiovascular disease in terms of acute...

Low-value care practice in headache: a Spanish mixed\xa0methods research study

BackgroundHeadache is one of the most prevalent diseases. The Global Burden of Disease Study ranks it as the seventh most common disease overall and the second largest neurological cause of disability in the world. The “Do Not Do” recommendations are a strategy for increasing the quality of care and reducing the cost of care for headache. This study aimed to identify specific low-value practices in headache care, determine their frequency, and estimate the cost overrun that they represent, in order to establish “Do not Do” recommendations specifically for headache by consensus and according to scientific evidence.MethodsThis was a mixed methods research study that combined qualitative consensus-building techniques, involving a multidisciplinary panel of experts to define the “Do Not Do” recommendations in headache care, and a retrospective observational study with review of a randomized set of patient records from the past 6 months in four hospitals, to quantify the frequency of these “Do Not Do” practices. We calculated the sum of direct costs of medical consultations, medicines, and unnecessary diagnostic tests.ResultsSeven “Do Not Do” recommendations were established for headache. In total, 3507 medical records were randomly reviewed. Low-value practices had a highly variable occurrence, depending on the hospital and type of headache. Overall, 34.1% of low-value practices were related to treatment, 21% were related to overuse of imaging in consultation, and 19% were related to emergency care. The estimated cost of low-value practices in the four hospitals was 203,520.47 euros per 1000 patients.ConclusionsThis study identified low-value headache practices that need to be eradicated and provided data on their frequency and cost overruns.

A survey to assess awareness and opinion of initiatives and recommendations on low-value diagnostic practices

BackgroundThe need to reduce healthcare practices that provide no value has led to the development of initiatives that generate and publish recommendations to improve the appropriateness of clinical practice by identifying potentially inappropriate services, making recommendations, and proposing improvements. DianaHealth (www.dianahealth.com) identifies, classifies, and publishes recommendations from numerous scientific societies. The purpose of this study was to determine the awareness and perceived usefulness and applicability of published recommendations on low-value diagnostic measures, as judged by physicians who are recognised clinical leaders in their respective centres.MethodsWe designed a questionnaire on the diagnostic recommendations considered relevant for each medical specialty and made it available, until September 2016, on DianaHealth. The survey was administered online to clinical leaders from 25 Spanish healthcare centres (hospitals and primary care centres).ResultsA total of 413 (40.0%) physicians from 34 different specialties participated. The participation rate varied between centres (range 21.1%-100.0%) and specialties (range 12.5%-78.9%). Do Not Do (57.1%) was the most widely-known initiative. Most participants (82.6%; IQR 77.9%-94.9%) stated that they knew at least one of the 12 initiatives that identify non-recommended practices, and on average they were aware of four initiatives (range 1-12). The initiatives were perceived useful by 82.4% (IQR 73.3%-90.4%), and perceived applicable by 75.6% (IQR 67.4%-86.8%). A total of 531 recommendations were assessed. Sixty-three percent (IQR 53.6%-77.5%) of participants reported they were aware of the recommendations for their corresponding specialty. A total of 84.5% (IQR 75.0%-90.0%) stated they agreed with the recommendations and 84.5% (IQR 75.0%-90.0%) considered them useful.Among those who agreed with their respective recommendations, a median of 51.5% (IQR 41.4%-60.9%) perceived the guidelines as being fully implemented, 40.1% (IQR 31.9%-46.8%) considered them partially implemented, and 7.1% (IQR 3.7%-12.9%), not implemented.ConclusionsClinical leaders’ awareness of initiatives that generate and publish recommendations to improve clinical appropriateness remains low, although they did consider them useful. In general, participants were familiar with their speciality-specific diagnostic recommendations, agreed with them, and perceived them as useful and implemented in their centres. More needs to be done to raise awareness among professionals who do not know of or apply these recommendations.

Identifying and de-implementing low-value care in primary care: the GP's perspective-a cross-sectional survey.

ObjectiveGeneral practitioners have an important role in reducing low-value care as gatekeepers of the health system. The aim of this study was to assess the experiences of Dutch general practitioners regarding low-value care and to identify their needs to decrease low-value primary care.DesignWe performed a cross-sectional study.ParticipantsWe sent a survey to 500 general practitioners.SettingPrimary care in the Netherlands.Primary and secondary outcomesThe survey contained questions about the provision of low-value care and on clinical cases about lumbosacral spine X-rays in patients with low back pain and vitamin B12 laboratory tests without an evidence-based indication. We also asked general practitioners what they needed to reduce low-value care.ResultsA total of 182 general practitioners (37%) responded. 67% indicated that low-value care practices are regularly provided in general practice. 57% of the general practitioners have seen negative consequences of low-value care, in particular side effects of medication. The most provided low-value care practices are medication prescriptions such as antibiotics and laboratory tests such as vitamin B12 tests. The most reported drivers are patient-related. General practitioners want to maintain a good relationship with their patients by offering their patients an intervention instead of watchful waiting. Lack of time also plays a major role. In order to reduce low-value care, general practitioners suggested that educating patients on the value of tests and treatments might help. Supporting general practitioners and other healthcare professionals with clear guidelines as well as having more time for consultation were also mentioned by general practitioners.ConclusionGeneral practitioners are aware of providing unnecessary care despite their role as gatekeepers and have reasons for this. They need support in order to change their practice. This support might consist of better education of healthcare professionals and providing more time for consultation. Local and national media, such as websites and television, could be used to educate patients while guidelines could support professionals in reducing low-value care.

Are Routine Laboratory Investigations Necessary Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?

OBJECTIVETo determine how effective routine postoperative blood work is in identifying complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), the gold standard treatment for large volume stone disease. Although major complication rates are low, hemorrhagic and sepsis-related complications are serious and can occur. Routine post-PCNL complete blood count is routinely performed by most endourologists but may be a low-value practice. METHODSA retrospective review was performed of all PCNL procedures at our center over a 3-year period. Patient demographic, stone characteristics and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. RESULTSThree hundred and eighty-five patients (196 female and 189 males) underwent PCNL for the treatment of urolithiasis. Mean age was 55.8 years and mean length of stay in hospital was 1.74 days. Most patients (82.9%) had neither ureteric stent nor percutaneous tube prior to PCNL. Postoperatively, 4 patients (1.0%) required a blood transfusion and 14 patients (3.6%) developed urosepsis. Patients who required either a transfusion or developed urosepsis demonstrated abnormal vital signs (tachycardia, hypotension, or fever) postoperatively. Sixteen patients (4.2%) had normal vital signs but had an extended hospital stay only to monitor abnormal blood work results. None these patients required a transfusion nor developed urosepsis but had a length of stay that was a mean of 1.5 days longer patients with normal postoperative vital signs and blood work. CONCLUSIONAbnormal vital signs alone identified all patients that required transfusion or treatment for urosepsis after PCNL. Routine complete blood count testing postoperatively may not improve detection of infectious or bleeding complications and may prolong hospital admission unnecessarily.

Choosing Wisely Africa: 10 low-value or harmful practices that should be avoided in cancer care.

e19213 Background: Choosing Wisely Africa, builds on Choosing Wisely (CW) in the USA, Canada and India, and aims to identify low-value, unnecessary, or harmful cancer practices that are frequently used on the African continent. Methods: The CWA Task Force was convened by African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer (AORTIC) and included representatives in surgical, medical and radiation oncology, the private and public sectors and patient advocacy group. Consensus was built through a modified Delphi process shortening a long list of practices to a short list then to a final list. Results: Of the 10 practices on the final list, one is a new suggestion, 9 are revisions or adaptations of practices from previous CW campaign lists. One item relates to palliative care, 8 concern treatment, and 1 relates to surveillance. Conclusions: The success of this campaign will be measured by how the list is implemented across sub-Saharan Africa and whether it improves the delivery of high-quality cancer care. [Table: see text]

Engaging patients in de-implementation interventions to reduce low-value clinical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundMany decisions regarding health resource utilization flow through the patient-clinician interaction. Thus, it represents a place where de-implementation interventions may have considerable effect on reducing the use of clinical interventions that lack efficacy, have risks that outweigh benefits, or are not cost-effective (i.e., low-value care). The objective of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to determine the effect of de-implementation interventions that engage patients within the patient-clinician interaction on use of low-value care.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched from inception to November 2019. Gray literature was searched using the CADTH tool. Studies were screened independently by two reviewers and were included if they (1) described an intervention that engaged patients in an initiative to reduce low-value care, (2) reported the use of low-value care with and without the intervention, and (3) were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental designs. Studies describing interventions solely focused on clinicians or published in a language other than English were excluded. Data was extracted independently in duplicate and pertained to the low-value clinical intervention of interest, components of the strategy for patient engagement, and study outcomes. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs and a modified Downs and Black checklist for quasi-experimental studies. Random effects meta-analysis (reported as risk ratio, RR) was used to examine the effect of de-implementation interventions on the use of low-value care.ResultsFrom 6736 unique citations, 9 RCTs and 13 quasi-experimental studies were included in the systematic review. Studies mostly originated from the USA (n = 13, 59%), targeted treatments (n = 17, 77%), and took place in primary care (n = 10, 45%). The most common intervention was patient-oriented educational material (n = 18, 82%), followed by tools for shared decision-making (n = 5, 23%). Random effects meta-analysis demonstrated that de-implementation interventions that engage patients within the patient-clinician interaction led to a significant reduction in low-value care in both RCTs (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.66–0.84) and quasi-experimental studies (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.43–0.87). There was significant inter-study heterogeneity; however, intervention effects were consistent across subgroups defined by low-value practice and patient-engagement strategy.ConclusionsDe-implementation interventions that engage patients within the patient-clinician interaction through patient-targeted educational materials or shared decision-making tools are effective in decreasing the use of low-value care. Clinicians and policymakers should consider engaging patients within initiatives that seek to reduce low-value care.RegistrationOpen Science Framework (https://osf.io/6fsxm)

Factors Associated With Potentially Inappropriate Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor Use for Pulmonary Hypertension in the United States, 2006 to 2015.

Use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) for groups 2 and 3 pulmonary hypertension (PH) is rising nationally, despite guidelines recommending against this low-value practice. Although receiving care across healthcare systems is encouraged to increase veterans' access to specialists critical for PH management, receiving care in 2 systems may increase risk of guideline-discordant prescribing. We sought to identify factors associated with prescribing of PDE5i for group 2/3 PH, particularly, to test the hypothesis that veterans prescribed PDE5i for PH in the community (through Medicare) will have increased risk of subsequently receiving potentially inappropriate treatment in Veterans Health Administration (VA). We constructed a retrospective cohort of 34 775 Medicare-eligible veterans with group 2/3 PH by linking national patient-level data from VA and Medicare from 2006 to 2015. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of receiving daily PDE5i treatment for PH in VA using multivariable models with facility-specific random effects. In this cohort, 1556 veterans received VA prescriptions for PDE5i treatment for group 2/3 PH. Supporting our primary hypothesis, the variable most strongly associated with PDE5i treatment in VA for group 2/3 PH was prior treatment through Medicare (OR, 6.5 [95% CI, 4.9-8.7]). Other variables strongly associated with increased likelihood of VA treatment included more severe disease as indicated by recent right heart failure (OR, 3.3 [95% CI, 2.8-3.9]) or respiratory failure (OR, 3.7 [95% CI, 3.1-4.4]) and prior right heart catheterization (OR, 3.8 [95% CI, 3.4-4.3]). Our data suggest a missed opportunity to reassess treatment appropriateness when pulmonary hypertension patients seek prescriptions from VA-a relevant finding given policies promoting shared care across VA and community settings. Interventions are needed to reinforce awareness that pulmonary vasodilators are unlikely to benefit group 2/3 pulmonary hypertension patients and may cause harm.

Frequency of Medical Reversal Among Published Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)

ObjectiveTo characterize what proportion of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among patients experiencing cardiac arrest find that an established practice is ineffective or harmful, that is, a medical reversal. MethodsWe reviewed a database of all published RCTs of cardiac arrest patient populations between 1995 and 2014. Articles were classified on the basis of whether they tested a new or existing therapy and whether results were positive or negative. A reversal was defined as a negative RCT of an established practice. Further review and categorization were performed to confirm that reversals were supported by subsequent systematic review, as well as to identify the type of medical practice studied in each reversal. This study was conducted from October 2017 to June 17, 2019. ResultsWe reviewed 92 original articles, 76 of which could be conclusively categorized. Of these, 18 (24%) articles examined a new medical practice, whereas 58 (76%) tested an established practice. A total of 18 (24%) studies had positive findings, whereas 58 (76%) reached a negative conclusion. Of the 58 articles testing existing standard of care, 44 (76%) reversed that practice, whereas 14 (24%) reaffirmed it. ConclusionReversal of cardiopulmonary resuscitation practices is widespread. This investigation sheds new light on low-value practices and patterns of medical research and suggests that novel resuscitation practices have low pretest probability and should be empirically tested with rigorous trials before implementation.

Low-Value Clinical Practices: Knowledge and Beliefs of Spanish Surgeons and Anesthetists.

OBJECTIVES: To know the frequency and causes of low value surgical practices, according to the opinion of surgeons and anesthetists, and to determine their degree of knowledge about the Spanish “Choosing wisely” initiative. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study, based on a self-administered online questionnaire through an opportunistic sample of 370 surgeons and anesthetists from three Spanish regions, contacted through Scientific Societies. The survey took part between July and December 2017. RESULTS: A patient profile requesting unnecessary practices was identified (female, 51−65 years old and unaffiliated disease). The frequency of requests was weekly or daily for 50.0% of the professionals, of whom 15.1% acknowledged succumbing to these pressures. To dissuade the patient, clinical reasons (47%) were considered the most effective. To increase control and safety in the case was the main reason to indicate them. The greatest responsibility for overuse was attributed to physicians, defensive medicine and mass media. Assessing professionals’ knowledge on unnecessary practices, an average of 5 correct answers out of 7 was obtained. Some 64.1% of the respondents were unaware of the Spanish “Choosing wisely” initiative. CONCLUSIONS: Low value surgical practices are perceived as a frequent problem, which requires an approach entailing intervention with patients and the media as well as professionals. Increase awareness on unnecessary surgical practices, and how to avoid them remain essential.

PCN218 AVOIDABLE WASTE IN ONCOLOGY CARE DELIVERY: PERCEPTIONS OF US HEMATOLOGISTS/ONCOLOGISTS

Almost a third of US healthcare expenditure has been attributed to waste from unnecessary process and inappropriate care. The Choosing Wisely® (CW) campaign initiated in 2012, assumes that educating providers about low value interventions will reduce waste. We sought to assess drivers of waste in oncology, awareness of CW and of the low value interventions it identifies in cancer patient management, among community hematologists/ oncologists (cH/O). A live meeting in November 2019 convened a representative sample of US cH/O. Participants attended a discussion entitled “From Choosing Wisely to Value-Based Care” and responded to questions via an audience response system. Of 54 cH/O, 43% had not heard of CW with only 24% reporting that CW programs are making a favorable impact. cH/O reported high prevalence of clinical practices that CW advises against: Multi-fraction radiation for skeletal metastases (60%), whole breast radiation post-lumpectomy (54%), overuse of imaging for staging (69%) and of biomarkers during post-treatment surveillance (59%). The primary drivers of cost within US healthcare system by participant ranking: administrative complexity (47%), overtreatment (44%) and drug pricing failure (41%). The most cited areas of resource overuse were inappropriate oncologic treatment (71%), imaging for staging (44%) and supportive care therapies (35%). The primary drivers of overuse were defensive medicine: fear of missing something (34%) and litigation (33%). The most underutilized resources were survivorship (56%), end of life care (56%) and molecular testing at diagnosis (36%). Nearly half (45%) of physician practices did not have protocols in place to minimize low-value practices. Several years after its initiation, there is limited awareness and adoption of CW and its recommendations among cH/O. Given its limited impact on clinical practice, research is needed to understand what interventions may be more effective in decreasing low value interventions and driving evidence-based practices in cancer care.

Understanding the public\u2019s role in reducing low-value care: a scoping review

BackgroundLow-value care initiatives are rapidly growing; however, it is not clear how members of the public should be involved. The objective of this scoping review was to systematically examine the literature describing public involvement in initatives to reduce low-value care.MethodsEvidence sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases from inception to November 26, 2019, grey literature (CADTH Tool), reference lists of included articles, and expert consultation. Citations were screened in duplicate and included if they referred to the public’s perception and/or involvement in reducing low-value care. Public included patients or citizens without any advanced healthcare knowledge. Low-value care included medical tests or treatments that lack efficacy, have risks that exceed benefit, or are not cost-effective. Extracted data pertained to study characteristics, low-value practice, clinical setting, and level of public involvement (i.e., patient-clinician interaction, research, or policy-making).ResultsThe 218 included citations were predominantly original research (n = 138, 63%), published since 2010 (n = 192, 88%), originating from North America (n = 146, 67%). Most citations focused on patient engagement within the patient-clinician interaction (n = 156, 72%), using tools that included shared decision-making (n = 66, 42%) and patient-targeted educational materials (n = 72, 46%), and reported both reductions in low-value care and improved patient perceptions regarding low-value care. Fewer citations examined public involvement in low-value care policy-making (n = 33, 15%). Among citations that examined perspectives regarding public involvement in initiatives to reduce low-value care (n = 10, 5%), there was consistent support for the utility of tools applied within the patient-clinician interaction and less consistent support for involvement in policy-making.ConclusionsEfforts examining public involvement in low-value care concentrate within the patient-clinician interaction, wherein patient-oriented educational materials and shared decision-making tools have been commonly studied and are associated with reductions in low-value care. This contrasts with inclusion of the public in low-value care policy decisions wherein tools to promote engagement are less well-developed and involvement not consistently viewed as valuable.Trial registrationOpen Science Framework (https://osf.io/6fsxm)

Barriers and Facilitators to De-Implementation of the Choosing Wisely® Guidelines for Low-Value Breast Cancer Surgery.

To address overuse of unnecessary practices, several surgical organizations have participated in the Choosing Wisely® campaign and identified four breast cancer surgical procedures as unnecessary. Despite evidence demonstrating no survival benefit for all four, evidence suggests only two have been substantially de-implemented. Our objective was to understand why surgeons stop performing certain unnecessary cancer operations but not others and how best to de-implement entrenched and emerging unnecessary procedures. We sampled surgeons who treat breast cancer in a variety of practice types and geographic regions in the United States. Using a semi-structured guide, we conducted telephone interviews (n = 18) to elicit attitudes and understand practices relating to the four identified breast cancer procedures in the Choosing Wisely® campaign. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and anonymized. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. For the two procedures successfully de-implemented, surgeons described a high level of confidence in the data supporting the recommendations. In contrast, surgeons frequently described a lack of familiarity or skepticism toward the recommendation to avoid sentinel-node biopsy in women ≥ 70years of age and the influence of other collaborating oncology providers as justification for continued use. Regarding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, surgeons consistently agreed with the recommendation that this was unnecessary, yet reported continued utilization due to the value placed on patient autonomy and preference. With a growing focus on the elimination of ineffective, unproven or low value practices, it is imperative that the behavioral determinants are understood and targeted with specific interventions to decrease utilization rapidly.

Low-value injury care in the adult orthopaedic trauma population: a protocol for a rapid review

IntroductionOrthopaedic injuries affect almost 90% of trauma patients. A previous scoping review and expert consultation survey identified 15 potential low-value intra-hospital practices in the adult orthopaedic trauma population. Limiting the...

Assessing volume and variation of low-value care practices in the Netherlands.

BackgroundThere have been contributions to quantify the volume of low-value care practices in the USA, Canada and Australia but we have no knowledge about the volume in Europe. The purpose of this study was to assess the volume and variation of Dutch low-value care practices.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study with data of a Dutch healthcare insurance company from general practioners (GP’s) and hospitals in the Netherlands from 2016. We used all billing claims made by healthcare providers of 3.5 million Dutch inhabitants. We studied Choosing Wisely recommendations in order to select low-value care practices. We used the percentage low-value care practices per hospital and number of low-value care practices per GP as outcomes.ResultsWe assessed the volume of low-back imaging by GPs, screening of patients over 75 years for colorectal cancer and diagnosing varices with Doppler or Plethysmography. We found that 0.4% (range 0–7%) of the eligible patients received low-value screening for colorectal cancer and 8.0% (range 0–88%) of eligible patients received low-value diagnosing of varices. About 52.4% of the GPs ordered X-rays and 11.2% ordered magnetic resonance imagings of the lumbosacral spine. Most healthcare providers did not provide the measured low-value care practices. However, 1 in 12 GPs ordered at least one low-back X-ray a week.ConclusionsThe three Choosing Wisely recommendations showed a lot of practice variation; many healthcare providers did not order these low-value diagnostic tests; a minor part did order a substantial amount, low-back spine radiology in particular. These healthcare providers should start reducing these activities.

Improving Value-Based Care Education in a Fellowship by Incorporating ACGME Competencies.

Most value-based care educational interventions teach knowledge of cost but fail to recognize the interrelatedness of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies of medical knowledge, patient care, practice-based learning and improvement, and systems-based practice. We analyzed the impact on clinical decision-making of an educational curriculum that incorporated the spectrum of ACGME competencies. Five didactic sessions for a gynecologic oncology fellowship were modified to incorporate cost- and value-based care considerations for each clinical topic addressed. After discussion, the group of fellows identified 1 high-value and 5 low-value practices to target for improvement. The fellows then undertook a chart audit of clinical decisions occurring for patients seen in the outpatient clinics. The frequency of low- and high-value practices was compared before and after the educational intervention. A total of 126 patients with a cervical cancer diagnosis were seen by participants in the outpatient setting during the entire observation period. After the intervention, the occurrence of 3 identified low-value practices was reduced by 13% to 33%, demonstrating modest effect sizes (effect size ϕ = 0.2-0.3). One high-value practice (smoking cessation counseling) increased 100% after a fellow-initiated quality improvement project was undertaken. Two low-value practices, including routine surveillance imaging, remained unchanged. Overlaying value-based concepts in didactic conference teaching resulted in measurable changes in decision-making behavior. Engaging learners in a subsequent, focused quality practice review served as a vital part of their educational experience and allowed us to assess learner competency in its practical application.

Mapping structure, process and outcomes in the removal of low-value care practices in Canadian intensive care units: protocol for a mixed-methods exploratory study

IntroductionThe challenge of implementing best evidence into clinical practice is a major problem in modern healthcare that can result in ineffective, inefficient and unsafe care. There is a growing body...

Identificación y revisión de prácticas clínicas de poco valor clínico en Cirugía General y Digestiva

IntroductionThere are currently widespread clinical practices that, because they do not have been supported by available scientific evidence, are inappropriate for most patients. The objective of the present study was to identify and review these low-value clinical practices in General Surgery. Material and methodsA systematic review of the specialized databases and the published guidelines with identification of low-value practices in General Surgery was carried out. Of the low-value practices selected for a tertiary and university hospitals through the consensus of expert surgeons, those that do not provide clinical value were identified. ResultsIn a first search, 4,019 recommendations were found, of which 60 were selected because they were focused on General Surgery. After evaluation by the experts, a total of 29 clinical recommendations were selected to be implemented in a specialty service, which were divided into those corresponding to diagnostic processes (n=9), procedures and surgical technique (n=10) and of perioperative care and medication (n=10). ConclusionsThere is evidence in the literature of some clinical practices that provide little value in General Surgery. The changes referring to do-not-do these practices should be implemented in current clinical practice of this specialty.

1053. De-Implementing Low-Value Antibiotic Prescribing Across Levels of Care

BackgroundPerforming urinalyses and urine cultures in asymptomatic patients is one of the most common reasons for inappropriate antibiotic use. However, de-implementing this practice has been difficult, especially for clinical scenarios deemed to be high risk for infectious complications, such as among patients with delirium or those undergoing orthopedic implant surgery.MethodsUsing the dual-process theory framework “Developing De-Implementation Strategies Based on Un-Learning and Substitution,” an educational intervention citing new IDSA guidelines and providing a pneumonic “ABCs of ASB” was created and delivered didactically to providers. The goal was to increase performance of evidence-based prevention actions in place of low-value urine screening and treating of asymptomatic patients. Clinical providers and staff (MD, RN, APRN, trainees) in 3 different levels of care (acute inpatient, long-term, and outpatient) were included. A web-based anonymous and confidential pre- and post-question format was delivered to assess influence on provider behavior.ResultsResponses from a range of 250–279 unique providers were collected. For scenario #1 (patient with delirium and a positive urine culture and no other infectious symptoms), the option to give antibiotics was reduced by 45% pre to 4% post, Chi-square P < 0.01). For scenario #2 (patient having a knee replacement and positive preoperative urine culture, no other symptoms) the option to give antibiotics was reduced by the same magnitude (~50%) but a lower absolute number (67% pre and 33% post, chi-square P < 0.01). Changes in predicted behavior were similar across levels of care.ConclusionSubstituting evidence-based practices in place of low-value practices is an appealing framework for influencing provider behavior. Our work demonstrates that education can successfully reduce the intention to use antibiotics for asymptomatic patients with positive urine cultures.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Low-value clinical practices in adult traumatic brain injury: an umbrella review protocol

IntroductionTraumatic brain injury (TBI) leads to 50 000 deaths, 85 000 disabilities and costs $60 billion each year in the USA. Despite numerous interventions and treatment options, the outcomes of...