In this work, surrogate fuels for three premium-grade gasoline fuels were formulated and its autoignition behavior was validated, together with that of an existing surrogate for E10 regular gasoline, by comparison to experimental data measured in the Sandia Low-Temperature Gasoline Combustion research engine facility. Surrogate fuels have been previously designed by matching fuel properties such as octane number, fuel/air stoichiometric ratio and hydrogen/carbon ratio. However, similar octane rating can be obtained with several blends that will show different ignition characteristics. To avoid this issue, the surrogate fuels shown in this paper have been formulated by matching the main components of the fuel detailed hydrocarbon analysis. Validation of the surrogates was performed by replicating engine experiments run with the real fuel in a 0-D internal combustion engine reactor model with detailed chemistry. A fitted heat-loss model had to be implemented to properly replicate the experimental in-cylinder thermodynamic conditions, which invalidates the adiabatic assumption sometimes applied to engine simulations. Furthermore, minor species present in the EGR and residuals, such as CO and NOx, had to be taken into account to replicate the experimental low-temperature heat release (LTHR) trends. Therefore, accounting for heat losses and detailed in-cylinder composition are essential to accurately simulate the engine data. The bottom dead center temperature deviation required to obtain the same combustion timing as in the experiments was used as a metric to evaluate the accuracy of simulations. The surrogates gave good performance for the whole explored range, and replication of LTHR is a key factor in matching the experimental data. Chemical kinetic analyses showed that replication of LTHR is controlled by the ability of the surrogate to properly balance radical generation from low-temperature chain branching decomposition with radical consumption from stable species. Surrogate components that act as a sink of radicals tend to suppress the LTHR of the fuel, which may lead to large deviations between simulations and experiments. Especial attention should be paid to these fuel species when selecting the surrogate components.