Low-risk Cervical Cancer Research Articles

Minimally invasive compared to open surgery in patients with low-risk cervical cancer following simple hysterectomy: An exploratory analysis from the Gynegologic Cancer Intergroup/Canadian Cancer Trials Group CX.5/SHAPE trial.

The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial demonstrated that minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with worse disease-free survival and overall survival among women with early-stage cervical cancer. It is unknown whether this applies to patients with low-risk disease following simple hysterectomy. Among patients who underwent simple hysterectomy in the Simple Hysterectomy And PElvic node assessment trial, univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to assess the association of minimally invasive versus open surgery with clinical outcomes, including pelvic and extra-pelvic recurrence-free survival, overall recurrence-free survival, and overall survival. Other variables included age, race, performance status, body mass index, stage, histologic type and grade, diagnostic procedure, lymphovascular space invasion before surgery and on final pathology, lymph node status, residual disease, and lesions >2 cm on final pathology. A total of 338 patients underwent simple hysterectomy. Of those, 281 (83%) were performed by minimally invasive surgery and 57 (17%) by open surgery. With a median follow-up of 4.5 years, a total of 12 (4.3%) recurrences were observed in 281 patients having simple hysterectomy by minimally invasive surgery versus 3 in 57 (5.3%) having open surgery (p = .73 from Fisher exact test). Although not randomized, the 2 groups were comparable except for histology and residual disease in the hysterectomy specimen. Patients with minimally invasive surgery had more adenocarcinoma and less adenosquamous compared to open surgery (35.9% versus 22.9% and 3.6% versus 14%, respectively; p = .005). Significantly fewer patients treated by minimally invasive surgery had residual disease in the hysterectomy specimen compared to open surgery (43.1 versus 57.9%; p = .04). No statistically significant difference between minimally invasive and open surgery in pelvic and extra-pelvic recurrence-free survival, overall recurrence-free survival, or overall survival was found. Our data indicate no statistical evidence that minimally invasive surgery is associated with poorer clinical outcomes for patients meeting the SHAPE criteria who underwent simple hysterectomy. Because the surgical approach was not a randomization factor, a large prospective trial is needed to confirm our results before a routine simple hysterectomy by minimally invasive surgery can be recommended.

Sexual Health and Quality of Life in Patients With Low-Risk Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Results From GCIG/CCTG CX.5/SHAPE Trial Comparing Simple Versus Radical Hysterectomy.

Simple hysterectomy and pelvic node assessment (SHAPE) is a phase III randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01658930) reporting noninferiority of simple compared with radical hysterectomy for oncologic outcomes in low-risk cervical cancer. This study presents secondary outcomes of sexual health and quality of life (QOL) of the SHAPE trial. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either radical or simple hysterectomy. Sexual health was assessed up to 36 months postoperatively using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised and QOL using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Cervical Cancer-Specific Module (QLQ-CX24) questionnaires. Among participants with at least one QOL measure, clinical and pathologic characteristics were balanced and with no differences in preoperative baseline scores for sexual health or QOL between groups. FSFI total score met the cutoff for dysfunction up to 6 months (P = .02) in the radical hysterectomy group. Group differences favored simple hysterectomy for FSFI subscales: desire and arousal at 3 months (P ≤ .001) and pain and lubrication up to 12 months (P ≤ .018). Both groups met the cutoff for sexual distress but was higher in radical hysterectomy at 3 months (P = .018). For QLQ-CX24, symptom experience was significantly better up to 24 months (P = .031) and body image better at 3, 24, and 36 months (P ≤ .01) for simple hysterectomy. Sexual-vaginal functioning was significantly better up to 24 months (P ≤ .022) and more sexual activity up to 36 months (P = .024) in the simple hysterectomy arm. Global health status was significantly higher at 36 months for simple hysterectomy (P = .025). Simple hysterectomy was associated with lower rates of sexual dysfunction than radical hysterectomy, with a lower proportion of women having sustained sexual-vaginal dysfunction. These results further support the benefit of surgical de-escalation for low-risk cervical cancer.

Survival After Simple Compared With Radical Hysterectomy for Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

To assess the effect on overall survival of simple hysterectomy with lymph node staging compared with radical hysterectomy with lymph node staging for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with early cervical carcinoma of 2 cm or smaller (stage IA1 with lymphovascular space invasion through IIA1, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging) from 2010 to 2019. After 1:1 propensity score matching, we compared patients who underwent simple hysterectomy with lymph node staging and those with radical hysterectomy with lymph node staging. The variables used for matching were age, tumor size, race and ethnicity, lymphovascular space invasion, year of diagnosis, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, histology, and surgical approach. The primary outcome was overall survival at the end of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rate and 30- and 90-day mortality rates. In total, 4,167 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 2,637 patients (63.3%) underwent radical hysterectomy and lymph node staging and 1,530 patients (36.7%) underwent simple hysterectomy and lymph node staging. After propensity score matching, 1,529 patients in each group were included. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients who underwent simple hysterectomy and those who underwent radical hysterectomy (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% CI, 0.91-1.73, P =.17). Subgroup analysis by histology, lymphovascular space invasion, tumor size, and surgical approach did not reveal statistically significant differences in overall survival according to hysterectomy type. The hysterectomy groups also did not significantly differ in 30-day readmission rate (4.6% vs 4.2%, P =.73), 30-day mortality rate (0.1% vs 0%, P =.14), or 90-day mortality rate (0.1% vs 0.1%, P =.93). Patients with low-risk cervical cancer could undergo less radical surgery without a negative effect on their oncologic outcomes.

Simple Versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Low-Risk Cervical Cancer

(Abstracted from N Engl J Med 2024;390:9) Radical hysterectomy is the standard-of-care treatment for early-stage cervical cancer; however, observational studies suggest no survival benefit between patients who undergo radical hysterectomy versus simple hysterectomy for stage IA2 cervical cancer. Additionally, 2 recent large studies have raised the question of whether simple hysterectomy compares favorably overall with radical hysterectomy in stage IA2 or IB1 disease with mixed evidence.

Non-inferiority of simple versus radical hysterectomy in low-risk cervical cancer.

Non-inferiority of simple versus radical hysterectomy in low-risk cervical cancer.

Simple versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women with Low-Risk Cervical Cancer

BackgroundRetrospective data suggest that the incidence of parametrial infiltration is low in patients with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer, which raises questions regarding the need for radical hysterectomy in these patients. However, data from large, randomized trials comparing outcomes of radical and simple hysterectomy are lacking.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial comparing radical hysterectomy with simple hysterectomy including lymph-node assessment in patients with low-risk cervical cancer (lesions of ≤2 cm with limited stromal invasion). The primary outcome was cancer recurrence in the pelvic area (pelvic recurrence) at 3 years. The prespecified noninferiority margin for the between-group difference in pelvic recurrence at 3 years was 4 percentage points.ResultsAmong 700 patients who underwent randomization (350 in each group), the majority had tumors that were stage IB1 according to the 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) criteria (91.7%), that had squamous-cell histologic features (61.7%), and that were grade 1 or 2 (59.3%). With a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, the incidence of pelvic recurrence at 3 years was 2.17% in the radical hysterectomy group and 2.52% in the simple hysterectomy group (an absolute difference of 0.35 percentage points; 90% confidence interval, −1.62 to 2.32). Results were similar in a per-protocol analysis. The incidence of urinary incontinence was lower in the simple hysterectomy group than in the radical hysterectomy group within 4 weeks after surgery (2.4% vs. 5.5%; P=0.048) and beyond 4 weeks (4.7% vs. 11.0%; P=0.003). The incidence of urinary retention in the simple hysterectomy group was also lower than that in the radical hysterectomy group within 4 weeks after surgery (0.6% vs. 11.0%; P<0.001) and beyond 4 weeks (0.6% vs. 9.9%; P<0.001).ConclusionsIn patients with low-risk cervical cancer, simple hysterectomy was not inferior to radical hysterectomy with respect to the 3-year incidence of pelvic recurrence and was associated with a lower risk of urinary incontinence or retention. (Funded by the Canadian Cancer Society and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01658930.)

Fertility Preservation in Cervical Cancer-Treatment Strategies and Indications.

Cervical cancer is frequently diagnosed in women during their reproductive years, and fertility preservation is an essential part of their cancer treatment. In highly selected patients with early stage, low-risk cervical cancer and a tumor size ≤ 2 cm, several treatment strategies can be offered for patients wishing to preserve fertility, including radical/simple trachelectomy or conization with pelvic lymph node assessment. Trachelectomy can be performed through a vaginal, abdominal, or minimally invasive approach and has been shown to have an equivalent oncologic outcome compared to radical hysterectomy. All surgical approaches for radical trachelectomy seem to have excellent survival with comparable oncologic outcomes. Nevertheless, patients undergoing vaginal trachelectomy have better obstetric outcomes compared to the other routes. In patients with larger tumors (2-4 cm), neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery is an alternative option. Several chemotherapy regimens have been used for this indication, with a pathologic complete response rate of 17-73%. For locally advanced diseases that require radical hysterectomy or primary chemoradiation, fertility preservation can be performed using oocyte, embryo, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation, as well as ovarian transposition. For these patients, future pregnancy is possible through surrogacy. In addition to fertility preservation, ovarian transposition, where the ovaries are repositioned outside of the radiation field, is performed to maintain ovarian hormonal function and prevent premature ovarian failure. In summary, fertility-preservation treatment strategies for patients with early stage cervical cancer are continuously evolving, and less radical surgeries are becoming more acceptable. Additional and ongoing evidence is helping determine the impact of conservative procedures on oncologic and obstetric outcomes in these patients.

Is it time to change surgery for early-stage low-risk cervical cancer to simple hysterectomy?

Is it time to change surgery for early-stage low-risk cervical cancer to simple hysterectomy?

Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Abandoning the One-Fits-All Concept.

Two pillars in modern oncology are treatment personalization and the reduction in treatment-related morbidity. For decades, the one-fits-all concept of radical hysterectomy has been the cornerstone of early-stage cervical cancer surgical treatment. However, no agreement exists about the prevalent method of parametrial invasion, and the literature is conflicting regarding the extent of parametrectomy needed to achieve adequate surgical radicality. Therefore, authors started investigating if less radical surgery was feasible and oncologically safe in these patients. Two historical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared classical radical hysterectomy (RH) to modified RH and simple hysterectomy. Less radical surgery showed a drastic reduction in morbidity without jeopardizing oncological outcomes. However, given the high frequency of adjuvant radiotherapy, the real impact of reduced radicality could not be estimated. Subsequently, several retrospective studies investigated the chance of tailoring parametrectomy according to the tumor's characteristics. Parametrial involvement was shown to be negligible in early-stage low-risk cervical cancer. An observational prospective study and a phase II exploratory RCT have recently confirmed the feasibility and safety of simple hysterectomy in this subgroup of patients. The preliminary results of a large prospective RCT comparing simple vs. radical surgery for early-stage low-risk cervical cancer show strong probability of giving a final answer on this topic.

Simple Hysterectomy as Standard of Care for Low-Risk Cervical Cancer

Simple Hysterectomy as Standard of Care for Low-Risk Cervical Cancer

An international randomized phase III trial comparing radical hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection (RH) vs simple hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection (SH) in patients with low-risk early-stage cervical cancer (LRESCC): A Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup study led by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG CX.5-SHAPE).

LBA5511 Background: In the last 2 decades, there has been a trend towards less radical surgery in patients with low-risk cervical cancer. Retrospective data suggested that less radical surgery may be safe and associated with less morbidity. The objective of this non-inferiority phase III prospective randomized trial was to compare RH to SH in women with LRESCC. Methods: Women with LRESCC defined as stage 1A2 or 1B1 with lesion ≤ 2cm were randomized to RH or SH after stratification by cooperative group, intended use of sentinel node mapping, stage, histological type, and tumour grade. The primary endpoint was pelvic recurrence rate at 3 years (PRR3). Non-inferiority of SH to RH is claimed when the 95% upper one-sided confidence limit (95% UCL) for the difference in PRR3 of SH to RH (DPRR3), calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method for pelvic-relapse free survival, is lower than or equal to 4%. Primary intention to treat (ITT) analysis included all patients randomized. Per-protocol (PP) analysis included patients eligible at baseline and without evidence of more advanced disease found at the time of surgery or final pathology, based on treatment received. Secondary endpoints included extrapelvic relapse-free survival (ERFS), overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QoL). Results: 700 women (12 countries, 130 centers) were enrolled from December 2012 to November 2019. Patient characteristics were well balanced: median age was 44 (24-80); 91.7% were stage 1B1 and 61.7% had squamous histology. 50% of the hysterectomies were done laparoscopically (56% SH vs. 44% RH), 25% robotically (24% vs. 25%) and 23% abdominally (17% vs. 29%). 4.4% of patients had lymph node metastasis (4.1% SH and 5.1% RH) and 3.1% had extrauterine extension (2.6% SH and 3.7% RH). A total of 8.8% of women received post-surgical adjuvant therapy (9.2% SH and 8.4% RH). With a median follow-up of 4.5 years, 21 pelvic recurrences were identified (11 SH and 10 RH). The PRR3 was 2.5% with SH and 2.2% with RH (DPRR3 0.35% with 95% UCL 2.32%) in ITT analysis; 2.8% with SH and 2.3% with RH (DPRR3 0.42% with 95% UCL 2.56%) in PP analysis. The 3-year ERFS and OS were respectively 98.1% and 99.1% with SH; 99.7% and 99.4% with RH. RH had significantly higher surgery related incidence of urinary incontinence (11.0% vs. 4.7% with SH; p=0.003) and urinary retention (9.9% vs. 0.6% with SH; p&lt;0.0001) during follow-up. QoL scales with significant difference between the two groups over time were all in favor of SH. Conclusions: The pelvic recurrence rate at 3 years in women with low risk early-stage cervical cancer who underwent a simple hysterectomy is not inferior to those who received a radical hysterectomy. Fewer surgical complications and better quality of life were observed with SH. Clinical trial information: NCT01658930 .

CircRNA-Based Cervical Cancer Prognosis Model, Immunological Validation and Drug Prediction.

Cervical cancer (CC) is a common cancer in female, which is associated with problems like poor prognosis. Circular RNA (circRNA) is a kind of competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) that has an important role in regulating microRNA (miRNA) in many cancers. The regulatory mechanisms of CC immune microenvironment and the transcriptome level remain to be fully explored. In this study, we constructed the ceRNA network through the interaction data and expression matrix of circRNA, miRNA and mRNA. Meanwhile, based on the gene expression matrix, CIBERSORT algorithm was used to reveal contents of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs). Then, we screened prognostic markers based on ceRNA network and immune infiltration and constructed two nomograms. In order to find immunological differences between the high- and low-risk CC samples, we examined multiple immune checkpoints and predicted the effect of PD-L1 ICI immunotherapy. In addition, the sensitive therapeutics for high-risk patients were screened, and the potential agents with anti-CC activity were predicted by Connective Map (CMap). We mapped a ceRNA network including 5 circRNAs, 17 miRNAs and 129 mRNAs. From the mRNA nodes of the network six genes and two kind of cells were identified as prognostic makers for CC. Among them, there was a significant positive correlation between CD8+ T cells and SNX10 gene. The results of TIDE and single sample GSEA (ssGSEA) showed that T cells CD8 do play a key role in inhibiting tumor progression. Further, our study screened 24 drugs that were more sensitive to high-risk CC patients and several potential therapeutic agents for reference. Our study identified several circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory axes and six prognostic genes based on the ceRNA network. In addition, through TIIC, survival analysis and a series of immunological analyses, T cells were proved to be good prognostic markers, besides play an important role in the immune process. Finally, we screened 24 potentially more effective drugs and multiple potential drug compounds for high- and low-risk patients.

Outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in IA1- IB1 cervical cancer patients with low-risk: A multi-center retrospective study with 10 years’ experience (487)

<b>Objectives:</b> More evidence revealed that the oncological outcomes of open abdominal radical hysterectomy (OARH) were superior to those of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer (CC). However, limited by the number of CC patients with IA and low-risk IB1, some aspects still needed more study to clarify. This retrospective study aimed to estimate the outcomes of LRH for IA1-IB1 cervical cancer patients with low- risk, which was defined as tumor <2cm, less than one-third stromal invasion, no lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), no lymph node involvement. <b>Methods:</b> By carefully studying the results of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) Trial, we were surprised to find that the number of early-stage CC patients with low risk was relatively insufficient. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records to identify the low-risk patients with FIGO 2018 stage IA1, IA2, and IB1 cervical cancer and who received laparoscopic or abdominal radical hysterectomy from January 2010 to December 2020 at four hospitals. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Chi-square test were used for the comparison of categorical variables. Progression-free survival and overall survival were compared between matched groups using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests, along with univariable and multivariable regression analysis. <b>Results:</b> Of 5360 patients selected, 1850 (35%) met the inclusion criteria for this study from January 2010 to December 2020. Of these, 1090 patients underwent open surgery, and 760 patients had laparoscopic surgery. In the entire cohort, the two groups were similar in regard to clinical characteristics, such as age, body mass index (BMI), FIGO stage, histologic type and grade, pelvic lymph nodes, positive margins, stromal invasion, LVSI, and adjuvant therapy. LRH had better outcomes compared with OARH in terms of blood loss, transfusion rates, and the length of hospital stay. And in the subgroup analysis, when it referred to those patients with low-risk factors (tumor <2cm, superficial stromal invasion, negative LVSI, and no lymph node involvement), the LRH group was equivalent to the OARH group with respect to both disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates. What's more, when the tumor was >2cm or accompanied by other medium and high-risk factors, the LRH group showed a significantly shorter DFS and OS than OARH, which was consistent with the LACC Trial. <b>Conclusions:</b> Among FIGO 2018 stage IA1-IB1 CC patients with low- risk, tumor <2cm, superficial stromal invasion, negative LVSI, and no lymph node involvement, there was no detrimental effect on survival between LRH and OARH. And it also needed more prospective studies to explore the oncological outcomes of low-risk CC patients with stage IA1-IB1. Besides, LRH was closely associated with worse oncological outcomes than OARH in patients with risk factors.

The positive threshold of the immunohistochemical parameter Ki67 for predicting the recurrence of cervical cancer.

To find the optimal threshold of Ki67 and evaluate its significance in predicting recurrence of stage I-II cervical cancer. A total of 1130 patients were included after screening. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to select factors associated with recurrence of cervical cancer. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the optimal threshold of Ki67. The differences of clinicopathological parameters and the survival analysis between the two groups divided based on the optimal threshold of Ki67 were compared. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that Ki67 (p<0.001) was significant prognostic predictor for recurrence of cervical cancer. The optimal threshold of Ki67 was 42%. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the overall survival (OS) of cervical cancer patients in the high-Ki67group (Ki67≥42%) were much lower than those in the low-Ki67group (Ki67<42%) (p<0.001, p<0.001). Among the 380 patients with low-risk cervical cancer, the RFS and OS of patients in the high-Ki67group were also lower than those in the low-Ki67group (p<0.001, p<0.001). The Ki67 was a useful prognostic factor in patients with stage I-II cervical cancer, and the Ki67labeling index 42.0% was optimal threshold for predicting recurrence.

Conization and lymph node evaluation in low-risk cervical cancer. Is it time to avoid radical surgery? Retrospective series and literature review

ObjectivesTo evaluate the oncologic and obstetric outcomes of patients with low-risk cervical cancer who underwent conization and lymphatic evaluation to preserve fertility. MethodsData were collected retrospectively from September 2013 to February 2021. Eligibility criteria included Women with cervical cancer (aged <45 years) who underwent fertility preservation treatment, [stage IA1 with positive lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), stage IA2, or stage IB1 (≤2 cm) with less <10 mm cervical stromal invasion, according to the International Federaltion of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system] aged ≤45 years who wished to preserve their fertility were included in this study. All patients were treated with cervical conization(s) and laparoscopic lymph node evaluation [pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping]. Oncologic and obstetric outcomes were evaluated. ResultsOverall, 31 patients met the inclusion criteria; 15 (48.3%) women were nulliparous. There were 8 IA1LVSI+ (25.8%), 11 IA2 (35.4%) and 12 IB1 (31.7%) tumours, according to 2018 FIGO stage classification. Most patients had squamous cell carcinoma (77.4%). Lymphovascular space involvement was found in thirteen patients (41.9%). Reconization was performed in 17 (54.8%) patients, of which 6(35.2%) were done due to compromised margins, 4(23.5%) for margins under than 3 mm, 3(17.6%) for unreported or coagulated margins and 4(23.5%) because previous conization was done in another institution and we could not obtain the paraffin blocks for pathology review. Twenty patients had MRI and eleven CT scan. Nine (30%) patients had a complete bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection, 9 (26.6%) had SLN mapping with pelvic lymphadenectomy, and 13 (43.3%) had SLN mapping alone after bilateral SLN identification at surgery. After a median follow-up of 41.4 months (range 2–90 months), no recurrences have been detected. In terms of obstetrial outcome, 11 patients attempted pregnancy and 9 became pregnant. First-trimester miscarriage occurred in one patient. Five patients delivered at term by caesarean section, one of them requiring hysterectomy at the time of delivery. Pathology did not show residual disease. Two patients had a vaginal delivery at 38 weeks. One pregnancy is still ongoing. ConclusionCervical conization with lymph node assessment by SLN mapping/lymphadenectomy is an oncologic safe procedure in patients with low-risk cervical cancer.

Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.

To compare oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for low-risk cervical cancer. We retrospectively compared the 3-year overall survival (OS) and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 1269 low-risk cervical cancer patients with FIGO 2009 stage IA2, IB1 and IIA1 with a tumour size < 2cm, no lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), superficial stromal invasion and no lymph node involvement on imaging, and who received LRH (n = 672) and ARH (n = 597) between 2009 and 2018 at 47 hospitals. In the total study population, LRH and ARH showed similar 3-year OS (98.6% vs. 98.9%, P = 0.850) and DFS rates (95.7% vs. 96.4%, P = 0.285). LRH was not associated with worse 3-year OS (HR 0.897, 95% CI 0.287-2.808, P = 0.852) or DFS (HR 0.692, 95% CI 0.379-1.263, P = 0.230) as determined by multivariable analysis. After propensity score matching in 1269 patients, LRH (n = 551) and ARH (n = 551) still showed similar 3-year OS (98.4% vs. 98.8%, P = 0.704) and DFS rates (95.5% vs. 96.3%, P = 0.249). LRH was still not associated with worse 3-year OS (HR 0.816, 95% CI 0.262-2.541, P = 0.725) or DFS (HR 0.694, 95% CI 0.371-1.296, P = 0.251). Among patients with low-risk cervical cancers < 2cm, no LVSI, superficial stromal invasion, and no lymph node involvement on imaging, no significant differences were observed in 3-year OS or DFS rates between LRH and ARH.

Factors affecting parametrial involvement in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤4 cm and selection of low-risk patient group

Objective:The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting parametrial involvement in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤4 cm and selection of the low-risk patient group based on long-term oncologic outcomes.Material and Methods:Cervical cancer patients operated in the gynecologic oncology division between 2007 and 2013 were retrospectively evaluated. One-hundred and sixty-eight patients with tumor size ≤4 cm were identified. Of these, 159 (86.8%) underwent radical hysterectomy plus pelvic-para-aortic lymphadenectomy and nine (13.2%) underwent fertility-sparing surgery [radical trachelectomy (n=7); large conization (n=2)]. Factors affecting parametrial invasion, including lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), deep stromal invasion (DSI), lymph node metastases, and tumor size, were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).Results:Median age was 49.5 years and median tumor size was 2.5 cm (0.45-4 cm). In both univariate and multivariate analyses, the risk of parametrial involvement was increased with LVSI with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.45 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-10.8] and DSI with a HR of 4.1 (95% CI: 1.18-14.8), while tumor size of ≤2 cm was only significant in univariate analyses. Furthermore, 26 early-stage patients were identified with low-risk factors and they had no parametrial involvement, lymph node metastases, recurrence, or death from disease over 77 months.Conclusion:Parametrial involvement in low-risk cervical cancer is very rare and less radical procedures may be safe in these patients.

Cervical conization and lymph node assessment for early stage low-risk cervical cancer

ObjectiveThere has been a contemporary shift in clinical practice towards tailoring treatment in patients with early cervical cancer and low-risk features to non-radical surgery. The objective of this study was...

Simple vaginal trachelectomy in women with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer who wish to preserve fertility: the new standard of care?

ObjectiveThere is a trend toward less radical surgery in women with small-volume disease who wish to preserve fertility. The objective of our study was to evaluate the oncologic and obstetrical...

Incidence of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Low-Risk Early Cervical Cancer (

To determine the incidence of lymph node metastasis in women with low-risk cervical cancer stage IA2 or IB1 (<2 cm) without lymph-vascular space invasion. A multicenter retrospective study was performed in patients who underwent radical or simple hysterectomy, conization, or trachelectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer between January 2000 and June 2016. A total of 271 patients were included in the study. Median age and body mass index were 46 years (range, 23-77 years) and 24 kg/m (range, 18-48 kg/m), respectively. Twenty-two patients had stage IA2 (8.1%), and 249 (91.9%) had stage IB1. The median tumor size was 14 mm (range, 5-20 mm). Tumor grades were 1 (n = 63 [23.2%]), 2 (n = 120 [44.3%]), 3 (n = 63 [23.2%]), and unknown (25 [9.2%]). Median depth stromal invasion was 6 mm (range, 3-20 mm). Histologic subtypes included squamous (n = 171 [63.1%]), adenocarcinoma (n = 92 [33.9%]), and adenosquamous (n = 8 [3.0%]). Overall incidence of lymph node metastasis was 2.9% (n = 8). The incidence of lymph node involvement in G1, G2, and G3 was 0% (0/63), 5% (6/120), and 3.1% (2/63), respectively. No patient with stage IA2 (regardless of grade or histology) or G1 cervical cancer less than 2 cm (stage IB1) had lymph node metastasis. Patients with stage IA2 or IB1 (G1) with tumor size of less than 2 cm and no lymph-vascular space invasion may not need lymph node evaluation. On the other hand, 95% and 98% of patients with grade 2 or 3 tumors, respectively, could potentially undergo an unnecessary lymphadenectomy. Further studies with bigger sample size are required to confirm these results.