Low Prostate-specific Antigen Research Articles

High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training for localized prostate cancer under active surveillance: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) have been increasingly adopted for localized prostate cancer (PCa) under active surveillance (AS). However, it is unclear which training modality is the most favorable in terms of cardiorespiratory fitness and biochemical progression. We searched PubMed, Cochrane and Embase for relevant RCTs. PRISMA guideline was adopted to ensure optimal conduct of this study. Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and peak VO2 were selected as primary outcomes and PSA doubling time (PSADT) and testosterone were selected as secondary outcomes. Only articles written in English were included. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for risk of bias evaluation. A total of 501 studies were selected. Six RCTs with 222 patients were included for data extraction and analysis. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) group demonstrated significantly lower PSA compared with usual care (UC) (MD = -1.4; 95%CI = -2.77 to -0.03) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) group (MD = -1.67; 95%CI = -3.30 to -0.05). Both HIIT and MICT showed significantly improved peak VO2 compared with UC. No significant difference was observed in PSADT and testosterone among different training modalities and UC. Regarding peak VO2, MICT had the highest surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) scores (98.1%). For serum PSA, HIIT had the highest probability (97.8%) to be the training with the highest efficacy. The potential source of bias mainly came from poorly performed allocation concealment and blinding strategies. The present study indicated that HIIT and MICT showed considerable cardiorespiratory benefits for localized PCa. HIIT was preferred over MICT in biochemical progression control in terms of decreasing serum PSA levels. However, MICT was favored over HIIT regarding cardiorespiratory benefits. The findings of this study may facilitate future lifestyle intervention, particularly in the form of physical training, for individuals diagnosed with localized PCa under AS.

Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes and Safety Profiles between Androgen Deprivation Therapy+Abiraterone/Prednisone and Androgen Deprivation Therapy+Docetaxel in Patients with De Novo Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes and safety profiles of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT)+abiraterone/prednisone with those of ADT+docetaxel in patients with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). A web-based database system was established to collect prospective cohort data for patients with mHSPC in Korea. From May 2019 to November 2022, 928 patients with mHSPC from 15 institutions were enrolled. Among these patients, data from 122 patients who received ADT+abiraterone/prednisone or ADT+docetaxel as the primary systemic treatment for mHSPC were collected. The patients were divided into two groups: ADT+abiraterone/prednisone group (n=102) and ADT+docetaxel group (n=20). We compared the demographic characteristics, medical histories, baseline cancer status, initial laboratory tests, metastatic burden, oncological outcomes for mHSPC, progression after mHSPC treatment, adverse effects, follow-up, and survival data between the two groups. No significant differences in the demographic characteristics, medical histories, metastatic burden, and baseline cancer status were observed between the two groups. The ADT+abiraterone/prednisone group had a lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression rate (7.8% vs. 30.0%; p=0.011) and lower systemic treatment discontinuation rate (22.5% vs. 45.0%; p=0.037). No significant differences in adverse effects, oncological outcomes, and total follow-up period were observed between the two groups. ADT+abiraterone/prednisone had lower PSA progression and systemic treatment discontinuation rates than ADT+docetaxel. In conclusion, further studies involving larger, double-blinded randomized trials with extended follow-up periods are necessary.

Associations of HALP score with serum prostate-specific antigen and mortality in middle-aged and elderly individuals without prostate cancer.

The association between the Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte, and Platelet (HALP) score and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and all-cause mortality remains underexplored. We aimed to investigate the relationship between HALP score and these outcomes among middle-aged and elderly individuals without prostate cancer (PCa). This cross-sectional study included participants aged 40 years and older from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2010. HALP score was calculated using the formula: HALP score = (Hemoglobin × Albumin × Lymphocytes)/Platelets. High PSA level was defined as a percentage free PSA (%fPSA) less than or equal to 25% and a total PSA (tPSA) level equal to or higher than 4.0 ng/mL. Mortality data were obtained through December 30, 2019 by linking to the National Death Index. Among 7,334 participants, 6,826 were classified as having low PSA level, while 508 were categorized as having high PSA level. Logistic regression revealed lower odds of high PSA level with higher HALP quartiles (P trend<0.001). Among 508 participants with high PSA level, over a median follow-up period of 10.13 years (IQR: 5.42-13.17 years), a total of 268 all-cause deaths were recorded. Cox regression analysis showed that participants in the highest HALP quartile had the lowest risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.527, 95% CI: 0.368-0.754) in participants with high PSA level. Restricted cubic spline analysis indicated a non-linear and negative correlation between HALP score and all-cause mortality, with an inflection point at 43.98 (P for non-linearity = 0.009). Random survival forest analysis ranked HALP score as the most significant predictor for all-cause mortality. Our study highlights that the HALP score the HALP score is associated with high PSA level and all-cause mortality among middle-aged and elderly individuals without PCa. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and elucidate underlying mechanisms.

Addressing controversial areas in the management of advanced prostate cancer in Canada Areas of consensus and controversy from the third Canadian consensus forum.

The management of prostate cancer (PCa) is rapidly evolving. Treatment and diagnostic options grow annually, however, high-level evidence for the use of new therapeutics and diagnostics is lacking. In November 2022, the Genitourinary Research Consortium held its 3rd Canadian Consensus Forum (CCF3) to provide guidance on key controversial areas for management of PCa. A steering committee of eight multidisciplinary physicians identified topics for discussion and adapted questions from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022 for CCF3. Questions focused on management of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC); use of novel imaging, germline testing, and genomic profiling; and areas of non-consensus from CCF2. Fifty-eight questions were voted on during a live forum, with threshold for "consensus agreement" set at 75%. The voting panel consisted of 26 physicians: 13 urologists/uro-oncologists, nine medical oncologists, and four radiation oncologists. Consensus was reached for 32 of 58 questions (one ad-hoc). Consensus was seen in the use of local treatment, to not use metastasis-directed therapy for low-volume mCSPC, and to use triplet therapy for synchronous high-volume mCSPC (low prostate-specific antigen). Consensus was also reached on sufficiency of conventional imaging to manage disease, use of germline testing and genomic profiling for metastatic disease, and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for BRCA-positive prostate cancer. CCF3 identified consensus agreement and provides guidance on >30 practice scenarios related to management of PCa and nine areas of controversy, which represent opportunities for research and education to improve patient care. Consensus initiatives provide valuable guidance on areas of controversy as clinicians await high-level evidence.

Illustration of association between change in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values and time to tumor status after treatment for prostate cancer patients: a joint modelling approach

BackgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is the most prevalent tumor in men, and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) serves as the primary marker for diagnosis, recurrence, and disease-free status. PSA levels post-treatment guide physicians in gauging disease progression and tumor status (low or high). Clinical follow-up relies on monitoring PSA over time, forming the basis for dynamic prediction. Our study proposes a joint model of longitudinal PSA and time to tumor shrinkage, incorporating baseline variables. The research aims to assess tumor status post-treatment for dynamic prediction, utilizing joint assessment of PSA measurements and time to tumor status.MethodsWe propose a joint model for longitudinal PSA and time to tumor shrinkage, taking into account baseline BMI and post-treatment factors, including external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), prostatectomy, and various combinations of these interventions. The model employs a mixed-effect sub-model for longitudinal PSA and an event time sub-model for tumor shrinkage.ResultsResults emphasize the significance of baseline factors in understanding the relationship between PSA trajectories and tumor status. Patients with low tumor status consistently exhibit low PSA values, decreasing exponentially within one month post-treatment. The correlation between PSA levels and tumor shrinkage is evident, with the considered factors proving to be significant in both sub-models.ConclusionsCompared to other treatment options, ADT is the most effective in achieving a low tumor status, as evidenced by a decrease in PSA levels after months of treatment. Patients with an increased BMI were more likely to attain a low tumor status. The research enhances dynamic prediction for PCa patients, utilizing joint analysis of PSA and time to tumor shrinkage post-treatment. The developed model facilitates more effective and personalized decision-making in PCa care.

Abstract C090: High GLUT1 membrane expression and low PSMA membrane expression in ductal adenocarcinoma and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate

Abstract Background: Both Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DAC) and Intraductal Carcinoma (IDC) of the prostate are generally associated with aggressive clinical behavior and poor prognosis and can be lethal. Furthermore, previous studies linked aggressive clinical behavior and poor prognosis with discordant FDG positivity and low Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression. A recent study only cited a DAC patient with low 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT uptake but high 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake, however, there is lack of directly compared articles nor large data sets. IDC-P has similar cribriform pattern in the pathological structure as a mean differential diagnosis for DAC. Hence, the objective of this study was to investigate the expression of PSMA and GLUT1 in DAC and IDC-P patients. Methods: The study was conducted on 87 DAC or IDCP patients without any treatment and 97 PAC patients with a Gleason score ≥ 8 of prostate biopsies and prostatectomy samples between August 2017 and August 2022. We performed immunohistochemical staining and scoring of various cancer component samples from the patients to reflect the protein expression levels of PSMA and GLUT1. Results: PSMA expression in PAC tissues was significantly higher than in DAC/IDC-P tissues (141.2 vs 78.6, p &amp;lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference in PSMA membrane expression between DAC/IDC-P and adjacent acinar adenocarcinoma (78.6 vs 93.4, p = 0.166). GLUT1 expression was higher in DAC/IDC-P tissue than in acinar adenocarcinoma tissue adjacent to DAC/IDC-P (68.6 vs 51.3, p = 0.007), but was still lower than that in PAC tissue (68.6 vs 93.1, p = 0.0014). It is worth noting that GLUT1 membrane expression in DAC/IDC-P was significantly increased than in PAC (13.0 vs 6.6, p = 0.025), and in acinar adenocarcinoma adjacent to DAC/IDC-P (13.0 vs 2.0, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusions: In DAC and IDC-P tissues, PSMA membrane expression is low, while GLUT1 expression, especially GLUT1 membrane expression is high. These findings imply that DAC and IDC-P cells may have higher glucose metabolic and raise interest in targeting membrane GLUT1 as a novel anticancer strategy for DAC/IDC-P and other prostate cancer with high glucose metabolism. Citation Format: Xingming Wang, Xiaomei Gao, Lin Qi, Ye Zhang, Hongling Yin, Yu Gan, Yi Cai. High GLUT1 membrane expression and low PSMA membrane expression in ductal adenocarcinoma and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C090.

Detection of Prostate Cancer Screening Disparities Using Geospatial Analysis of Laboratory Results

Abstract Black men experience higher prevalence and mortality from prostate cancer (PCa) but are less likely to undergo PCa screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The reasons for this disparity are multifactorial and include lack of access, PCa education, and mistrust in the healthcare system. Identifying geographic regions with low PSA screening and high positivity rates could potentially help inform targeted interventions. This study aimed to examine racial, socioeconomic, and geospatial disparities in PSA screening and positivity rates in the Siteman Cancer Center (St. Louis, MO) catchment region. The results of all PSA screening tests ordered in the Barnes-Jewish Healthcare Corporation (St. Louis, MO) and performed from 9/2019-12/2022 were retrieved from the laboratory information system with patient demographics. Patient addresses were geocoded using ArcGIS Pro (ESRI, Redlands, CA) and assigned to a census tract of residence. The PSA screening-eligible population was defined as the number of persons ≥50 years of age based on U.S. Census data. Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) values were retrieved from the Centers for Disease Control. The PSA screening rate was calculated by census tract as the total number of PSA tests performed/PSA screening-eligible population. The PSA positivity rate was calculated by census tract as the number of PSA positive tests/total PSA tests. All census tracts with fewer than 10 PSA tests performed were omitted from PSA positivity analysis. Hotspot analysis was performed by calculating Local Moran’s I statistic per census tract and comparing with 999 randomly-generated maps. A total of 90,994 screening tests for 60,005 patients (48,024 White [80%], 10,425 Black [17%], and 1,556 Other [3%]) were performed for patients in the catchment region. Black patients were 78% more likely to receive a positive PSA screen than White patients (p&amp;lt;0.001). Of those screening positive, Black patients had a significantly higher median[IQR] (7.94[6.2-13.7 ng/mL]) PSA result compared to White patients (7.4[6.2-10.1 ng/mL]) (p&amp;lt;0.001) and a median[IQR] age of 67[61-74 years] vs. 69[63-76 years] (p&amp;lt;0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression using age, race, and census tract of residence SVI to predict PSA positivity, only census tract SVI was not statistically significant. A model using only age and race demonstrated that every 10 years of age and Black race were associated with 11% and 7% increased odds of receiving a PSA positive test, respectively (p&amp;lt;0.001). 75 and 191 of 789 census tracts in the catchment region were identified as PSA positivity hotspots and PSA screening cold spots, respectively. In conclusion, this study confirms previous reports of higher PSA values among Black patients and suggests that geospatial analysis of PSA testing can identify geographic regions with low testing and high positivity rates.

Low PSA radiographic disease progression on C11-choline PET.

For men with prostate cancer, radiographic progression may occur without a concordant rise in prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Our study aimed to assess the prevalence of radiographic progression using C-11 choline positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in patients achieving ultra-low PSA values and to evaluate clinical outcomes in this patient population. In a single institution study, we reviewed the prospectively maintained Mayo Clinic C-11 Choline PET metastatic prostate cancer registry to identify patients experiencing radiographic disease progression (rDP) on C-11 choline PET scan while the PSA value was less than 0.5ng/mL. Disease progression was confirmed by tissue biopsy or response to subsequent therapy. Clinicopathologic variables were abstracted by trained research personnel. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Intergroup differences were assessed using the log-rank test. A univariate and multivariate Cox regression model was performed to investigate variables associated with poor survival after rDP. A total of 1323 patients within the registry experienced rDP between 2011 and 2021, including 220 (16.6%) men with rDP occurring at low PSA level. A median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 54.7 (19.7-106.9) months elapsed between the time of prostate cancer diagnosis and low PSA rDP, during which 173 patients (78%) developed castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Sites of low PSA rDP included local recurrence (n = 17, 8%), lymph node (n = 90, 41%), bone (n = 94, 43%) and visceral metastases (n = 19, 9%). Biopsy at the time of rDP demonstrated small-cell or neuroendocrine features in 21% of patients with available tissue. Over a median (IQR) follow-up of 49.4 (21.3-95.1) months from the time of low PSA rDP, 46% (n = 102) of patients died. Factors associated with poorer survival outcomes include advanced age at rDP, CRPC status, bone and visceral metastasis (p value <0.05). Visceral metastases were associated with decreased overall survival (p = 0.009 by log-rank) as compared with other sites of rDP. Men with prostate cancer commonly experience metastatic progression at very low or even undetectable PSA levels. Periodic imaging, even at low absolute PSA values, may result in more timely identification of disease progression.

Diagnostic Performance of PSMA-Based 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients After Definitive Treatment With PSA Level ≤0.2 ng/mL.

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in the evaluation of prostate cancer (PC) patients after definitive treatment and with low-level prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of ≤0.2 ng/mL. This retrospective study was conducted in PC patients who received definitive treatments with PSA level of ≤0.2 ng/mL and underwent 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT within a 1-week interval of PSA examination, and without interval treatment change or history of other cancer. Patient and tumor characteristics at initial diagnosis, treatment regimens, and findings on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT were collected. Patients with minimal 6-month (median, 11 months; range, 6-21 months) follow-up or definitive biopsy results of the suspected PET/CT findings were included. Imagine findings were reached with consensus among experienced board-certified nuclear medicine physicians. Comprehensive follow-up and/or biopsy results were used as definitive determination of presence or absence of disease. Comparisons between groups of positive and negative 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT were done by using descriptive statistics. A total of 96 18F-DCFPyL PET/CTs from 93 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median Gleason score (GS) of positive group is 8 (range, 6-10), whereas negative group is 7 (range, 6-10). The median age of positive group is 71 (range, 50-90), whereas negative group is 69 (range, 45-88). There were 49 positive (51%) and 47 negative 18F-DCFPyL PET/CTs (49%). Detection rates at PSA level of ≤0.1 and 0.2 ng/mL were 58.7% (27/46) and 44% (22/50), respectively. The scan-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value are 100%, 95%, 96%, and 100% in group with PSA level of ≤0.1 ng/mL, and 100%, 97%, 95%, and 100% in group with PSA level of 0.2 ng/mL, respectively. Sites of involvement on positive 18F-DCFPyL PET/CTs were prostate bed, pelvic lymph nodes, bone, chest and supraclavicular lymph nodes, lung, and adrenal glands. The SUVmax value on positive lesions ranged from 1.9 to 141.4; the smallest positive lymph node was 0.4 cm. High GS of 8-10, known metastatic status (M1), presence of extraprostatic extension, presence of seminal vesicle invasion, and very high-risk PC are significantly associated with positive 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT results (P < 0.05). Of all analyzed treatment regimes, upfront surgery (radical prostatectomy with or without pelvic lymph node dissection) had strong correlation with negative PET/CT results (P < 0.001). If patients received ADT only, or ADT plus chemotherapy, the PET/CT results were most likely positive (P = 0.026). For other treatment regimes, there were no statistical differences between the groups (P > 0.05). In the presence of low PSA level in PC patients after definitive treatment, 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT is most beneficial in detection of disease in patients with GS of 8 or higher at the time of diagnosis, and the ones who have history of ADT only, or ADT plus chemotherapy. There is excellent negative prediction value of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT. However, there is no cutoff PSA level for 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT indication and no correlation between PSA level and SUVmax of positive lesions on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT.

Outcomes in Locally Advanced Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer Presenting with Low PSA at Diagnosis.

Men with low serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and high Gleason grade group (GGG) are thought to have poor outcomes compared to high PSA secretors. However, there is limited outcome data to support this. We report clinical outcomes from a single-institutional cohort of men presenting with locally advanced prostate cancer but low serum PSA. Data from electronic database of a UK tertiary cancer center was acquired for men with histological diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma, GGG 4 or 5, stage ≥cT3a, and PSA <10ug/L at diagnosis. Men with metastatic disease, or prior androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were excluded. Biochemical progression was defined as per Phoenix criteria (PSA > nadir+2) for primary radiotherapy, or PSA >0.2 ug/L after primary prostatectomy (and post-operative radiotherapy, if received). Overall survival (OS, from date of diagnosis to death), metastasis-free survival (MFS, from diagnosis to first recorded metastasis or death), and biochemical progression free survival (bPFS, from diagnosis to biochemical progression or death) were estimated by Kaplan Meier method, and multivariable analysis performed using Cox proportional hazards method. Medical records of 7,200 men presenting with non-metastatic prostate cancer from 2013 to 2021 were screened, of which 270 men satisfying the eligibility criteria were included for this study. Initial analysis of 123 men shows median PSA at presentation 7.1 ug/L (IQR 5.6-8.5), and median age 70 years (IQR 65-75). Histology was GGG 4 in 47.6% and 5 in 52.4%. Tumor stage was cT3a in 56.6%, cT3b in 36.9%, and T4 in 6.6%. Pelvic nodes were involved in 5% patients. Majority (83.7%) were treated with radical radiotherapy (external beam alone 64.2%, brachytherapy boost 19.5%), with 24 months ADT; 11.4% underwent radical prostatectomy, and 4.9% received ADT alone. Three men (2.4%) received docetaxel, and one received abiraterone. At a median follow up of 66 months (IQR 27-77), 36 (29.3%) patients had biochemical failure. Total 23 (18.6%) patients had metastases at recurrence, which were visceral in 4%, bone-only in 10%, and nodal-only in 4%. Total 38 (30.6%) patients had died, 23% with prostate cancer and 11% due to other causes. Five-year bPFS was 65.9%, MFS 69.0%, and OS was 77.4%. GGG 5 (versus 4) was associated with significantly worse 5-year bPFS (59.4% vs 73.9%, HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.2, p = 0.05) and MFS (59.2% vs 81.6%, HR 2.2, 1.2-4.2, p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis including age and PSA at diagnosis, only GGG 5 was associated with worse bPFS (HR 1.8, 1.0-3.3, p = 0.05) and MFS (HR 2.42, 1.25-4.67, p = 0.009). Men with low secreting but high Gleason grade group prostate cancer are a relatively rare group with poor clinical outcomes despite being non-metastatic. Ongoing work (expected completion June 2023) will analyze remaining cases, and compare outcomes within an expanded multicentric cohort with matched controls having elevated PSA at presentation.

Serum prostate-specific antigen trends and prostate cancer detection on follow-up in men with a prior negative biopsy: A cohort study

ABSTRACT Introduction: Elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most common trigger for a prostate biopsy. However, the range of normal PSA is poorly defined in many populations. Men with “elevated” PSA may not harbor cancer, and it is unclear if such men with a prior negative prostate biopsy should be biopsied again. We conducted a cohort study to assess the PSA trends and cancer detection rates in such men. Methods: In an Institutional Review Board-approved ambispective study, men who underwent prostate biopsy between January 2016 and December 2021 for PSA &gt; 4 ng/mL were identified. Among them, those whose biopsy was negative for malignancy were contacted either telephonically or reviewed in person, and the most recent PSA and histopathology of any repeat prostate biopsy were determined. These were evaluated to assess the PSA trend, re-biopsy rate, and cancer detection rate. Results: During the study period, prostate biopsies were performed in a total of 1260 men; out of which 444 were negative for malignancy and 241 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Their median prebiopsy PSA was 9.81 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.14–15.6), and the median follow-up PSA was 5.08 (IQR: 3.18–8.4). At a median follow-up of 53 months (range: 6–77 months), PSA had decreased in 177 (73.4%) patients, was static in 48 (19.9%) patients, and increased in only 16 (6.6%) patients. Repeat biopsy was performed on 20 patients; of whom seven had cancer (35%) with an overall positivity rate of 2.9% among the 241 patients. Although the positivity rate was higher in men with increased PSA, it was not statistically different from those with lower or similar PSA. No factors could be identified to predict a positive repeat biopsy. Conclusions: PSA, the sole trigger for a prostate biopsy, declined in nearly three-quarters of men with a negative first biopsy, and &lt;3% of men were detected to have cancer on a repeat biopsy. This information could help appropriately counsel patients and allay anxiety after a negative biopsy.

Clinical Usefulness of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence after Primary Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Below the Phoenix Threshold: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

AimsAfter primary radiotherapy, biochemical recurrence is defined according to the Phoenix criteria as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value >2 ng/ml relative to the nadir. Several studies have shown that prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ligand positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can help in detecting recurrence in patients with low PSA values. This study aimed to assess the detection rate and patterns of PSMA-ligand PET/CT uptake in patients with suspected biochemical recurrence after primary radiotherapy and with PSA levels below the Phoenix threshold. Materials and methodsThe meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Articles providing data on patients with suspected prostate cancer recurrence after primary radiotherapy with a PSA value below the Phoenix threshold and who underwent PSMA-ligand PET/CT were included. Quality assessment was carried out using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool (QUADAS-2). ResultsIn total, five studies were included, recruiting 909 patients (202 with PSA ≤2 ng/ml). The PSMA-ligand detection rate in the patients with ≤2 ng/ml ranged from 66 to 83%. The most frequent source of PSMA-ligand PET/CT uptake was local recurrence, followed by lymph node metastasis and bone metastasis. PSMA-ligand PET/CT uptake due to local-only recurrence was more likely in patients with PSA ≤2 ng/ml compared with PSA > 2 ng/ml: risk ratio 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.58–0.89), P = 0.003. No significant differences were observed in the detection of PSMA-ligand uptake in other areas. Limitations include a lack of biopsy confirmation, cohort reports with small sample sizes and a potentially high risk of bias. ConclusionA significant detection of PSMA-ligand-avid disease was observed in patients with PSA levels below the Phoenix threshold. There was a higher likelihood of detecting local-only uptake when the PSA value was ≤2 ng/ml. The findings suggest that a critical review of the Phoenix criteria may be warranted in the era of PSMA-ligand PET/CT and highlight the need for further prospective trials.

A-035 Association between Obesity and Prostate Specific Antigen level in Diabetes Mellitus Type2

Abstract Background Body mass index (BMI) is a simple index commonly used to classify obesity. It is defined as a person’s weight(kg) divided by the square of his height (m). An inverse relationship between obesity and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been reported by previous studies with lower PSA levels found in groups with a higher body mass index (BMI). The main objective of this current study is to assess the association between body mass index (BMI) and PSA in male patients with diabetes mellitus. Methods This study uses a case-control experimental procedure to assess adult men between 40–75 years old, attending University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu State, Nigeria. Eighty-six (86) of the volunteers recruited for this study were patients diagnosed with type II diabetes, and sixty (60) others were non-diabetic patients used as controls. Consent was sorted from these patients, and a questionnaire was given to the participants in which data about their age, family history of diabetes, and prostate condition was collected. Their hospital folders were used to confirm their diabetic status and prostate gland health. Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated after measuring weight (kg) and height(m). Blood samples were assayed to determine the fasting blood sugar (FBS) using Glucose Oxidase enzymatic method, and total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) concentration was determined using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The Body mass index (BMI), as a “gold standard” approach for obesity classification, was used to group the patients as; underweight (below 18.5), normal weight (18.5–24.9), pre-obesity (25.0–29.9), obesity class I (30–34.9), obesity class II (35.0–34.9), and obesity class III (40 and above). The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 was used to analyze data generated and compared between groups using student T-test. Statistical difference was at a P value of 0.05 or higher. Results The result of this study demonstrated a significant difference in the BMI of diabetic men (test) and non-diabetic men (control). Moreso, lower tPSA was observed in obese men compared to normal BMI in both test and control. Hemodilution caused by elevated plasma volume, which may reduce serum concentration of soluble tumor markers, may be responsible for lower PSA levels in obese men. Conclusion Obesity may hinder the ability to detect prostate cancer at an earlier stage. Therefore, BMI should be considered while determining a PSA threshold for prostate disorders screening.

Interaction between drinking and dietary inflammatory index affects prostate specific antigen: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundNumerous studies have shown that the dietary inflammatory index (DII) is associated with adverse health effects. However, the relationship between DII and prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. Although alcohol is included in DII as a dietary factor, the various adverse health effects of alcohol consumption are not only related to inflammation. On the other hand, it has been a long-standing debate whether alcohol consumption is linked to the risk of PCa. Therefore, to clarify whether drinking affects the relationship between DII and PCa, we evaluated the correlation between DII and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database.MethodsWe used data from the NHANES spanning from 2005 to 2010 to analyze the relationship between PCa and DII. Out of the 31,034 NHANES participants, we enrolled 4,120 individuals in our study, utilizing dietary intake data from a twenty-four-hour period to determine DII scores. Demographic data, physical and laboratory test results were collected to compare between low PSA and high PSA groups, and to calculate the odds ratio between both groups, we employed a logistic regression analysis.ResultsIn this cross-sectional investigation of PCa, drinkers and non-drinkers had different relationships between DII and PSA levels (OR: 1.2, 95% Cl: 1-1.44 vs. OR: 0.98, 95% Cl: 0.9–1.07), and DII and abstaining from alcohol were effective in reducing the incidence of PSA (p-value for significant interaction = 0.037).ConclusionThe results of our study suggest that drinking may influence the relationship between DII and PSA levels. DII is likely to be a reliable indicator for estimating PSA levels among non-drinkers, who may limit their intake of pro-inflammatory ingredients to lower the incidence and death of PCa.

The diagnostic effectiveness of serum sialic acid predicts both qualitative and quantitative prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 20 ng/mL.

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the serum biochemical index, including alkaline phosphatase (AKP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), α-L-fucosidase (AFU), serum sialic acid (SA), and fibrinogen (FIB), for prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) in patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value between 4 and 20 ng/mL. This study retrospectively examined the clinical data of 408 eligible patients who underwent prostate biopsies in our hospital between March 2015 and July 2022. CSPCa was defined as a "Gleason grade group of≥2". For analyzing the association between PCa/CSPCa and serum biochemical index, univariable logistic regression and multivariable logistic regression were conducted. Based on the multivariable logistic regression model, we constructed models and compared the area under the curve (AUC). We generated the nomogram, the ROC curve, the DCA curve, and the calibration curve for PCa. Overall, we studied 271 patients with PCa (including 155 patients with CSPCa) and 137 non-PCa patients. Patients with PCa were more likely to consume alcohol, have higher total PSA (TPSA) values, and have lower free PSA (FPSA) and free/total PSA (f/T) values. There were higher TPSA values and lower f/T values in the CSPCa group when compared with the non-CSPCa group. The univariate logistic regression analyses did not show significant results. However, AKP, AFU, SA, TPSA, and FPSA all retain significant significance when all factors are included in multifactor logistic regression analysis. This finding suggests that the exposure factor exhibited an independent effect on the outcome after controlling for other factors, including the potential confounding effects that may have been underestimated. Through ROC curves, we found that SA and TPSA levels are more powerful predictors. In contrast, there is a lack of excellent predictive value for PCA and CSPCa using Age, AFU, FIB, and FPSA. In our study, serum biochemical index is a potential prediction tool for PCa and CSPCa for patients with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL. Additionally, the new serum biochemical index SA is also useful when diagnosing PCa and CSPCa, as we conclude in our study.

Prognostic biomarkers in the use of radium-223 in patients with metastatic castration-resistent prostate cancer

ObjectivesThis study aimed to establish basal biomarkers in patients with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with 223Ra to predict better overall survival (OS), and assess hematologic toxicity and treatment response. Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective multicenter study including 151 patients with mCRPC between 2013 and 2020. OS was assessed according to basal hemoglobin (Hb), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and alkaline phosphatase (AP) values, the World Health Organization pain scale, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scale, the number of metastatic lesions on bone scintigraphy (BS), and the use of protective bone agents and the dose received. The grade of hematological toxicities was evaluated as well as treatment response based on changes in AP and pre- and post-treatment pain. ResultsThe median OS was 24 months (95% confidence interval 16.5–31). The OS in 70% of patients who received complete (5–6 doses) versus incomplete (1–4 doses) 223Ra treatment was 34.9 vs. 5.8 months, respectively, being longer in patients with lower PSA and AP values, Hb >13 g/dl, lesser bone metastasis on bone scan and with an ECOG 0−1. 52/151 patients (34%) died during follow-up. Pain reduced in nearly 70% of patients and 66% presented a reduction in AP values. Half of the patients presented mild and 5 % severe hematological adverse effects. ConclusionsmCRPC patients treated with 223Ra with Hb values >13 g/mL, an ECOG 0−1, low AP values, PSA < 20 ng/mL and lesser bone metastasis on BS presented a better OS with an adequate safety profile.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography detected local failure after post-prostatectomy radiation therapy: Low rates of out-of-field recurrence validates current Australian prostate bed contouring guidelines.

The Australian Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genitourinary Group (FROGG) developed prostate bed clinical target volume (CTV) contouring guidelines which were subsequently used to develop the National EviQ guidelines for adjuvant and salvage post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (PPRT). These guidelines were based mainly upon consensus agreement. With the advent of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET), sites of recurrence can now be detected with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels following radical prostatectomy. We evaluated sites of recurrence in patients treated with FROGG/EviQ CTVs to inform upcoming modifications of these guidelines. At our institution, we use the FROGG/EviQ guidelines for PPRT. From 2015, patients with PSA failure following PPRT have been re-staged using PSMA PET imaging. We identified patients with PET-avid local, nodal, and distant recurrences, fusing them with original treatment plans to determine whether recurrences were within or outside the prostate bed CTV. Regional nodal failures were reviewed to determine if they were within current elective node contouring guidelines. Ninety-four patients had positive PSMA PET following PPRT. Nine (9.6%) recurrences were local, seven being local-only. One local recurrence (1.1%) was just superior to the contoured prostate bed CTV, located within the vas deferens. Seventy-three (77.7%) patients had a component of node failure, with 56 (59.6%) having node-only failure. Sites of nodal relapses were covered by standard contouring guidelines 60.3% of the time. The low recurrence rate outside of current prostate bed CTV contouring guidelines is consistent with other studies using contemporary contouring, and validates the efficacy of the current FROGG/EviQ prostate bed CTV definition.

The role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection in bone-metastatic prostate cancer: A population-based study.

The role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (cRP) for bone-metastatic prostate cancer (bmPCa) remains controversial. We aimed to figure out whether cRP and lymph node dissection (LND) can benefit bmPCa. 11,271 PCa patients with bone metastatic burden from 2010 to 2019 were identified using SEER-Medicare. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were visualized using Kaplan-Meier plots. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were constructed to examine the effects of cRP and LND on survival, after stratifying to age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinical stages, Gleason score, metastatic burden, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy status. 317 PCa patients underwent cRP and cRP was increasingly performed for bmPCa from 2010 (2.2%) to 2019 (3.0%) (p < 0.05). In multi analyses, cRP was predisposed to a better OS or CSS in patients with age < 75, PSA < 98 ng/mL, bone-only metastatic sites or patients not receiving chemotherapy (all p < 0.05). For the patients undergoing cRP, LND especially extended LND was associated with a better OS or CSS (all p < 0.05). cRP might benefit OS or CSS in young patients with low PSA and bone-only metastatic sites not receiving chemotherapy. And a clear OS or CSS benefit of LND especially extended LND was observed in patients undergoing cRP.

Association of TyG index with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in American men: results from NHANES, 2003–2010

BackgroundIn recent years, triglyceride-glucose index (TyG) was a new indicator of insulin resistance, and it has been widely reported that it may be associated with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations.AimsWe intended to investigate the possible connection between serum PSA concentration and the TyG index.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study of adults with complete data on TyG and serum PSA concentrations (ng/ml) from the NHANES, 2003–2010. The TyG index is obtained by the formula below: TyG = Ln [triglycerides (mg/dL) × fasting glucose(mg/dL)/2]. Multivariate regression analysis and subgroup analysis were used to examine the connection between the TyG index and serum PSA levels.ResultsMultiple regression analysis of the weighted linear model showed that individuals with a higher TyG index had lower PSA levels. Subgroup analyses and interaction tests showed no apparent dependence on age, race/ethnicity, BMI, household income ratio, education level, and marital status on this negative association (all interactions p > 0.05).ConclusionsTyG index is related to lower serum PSA concentrations in adult men from the USA. Further comprehensive prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Diagnosis of high-grade prostate cancer in patients with unexpectedly low prostate specific antigen levels: a rare case series

Link of Video Abstract: https://youtu.be/PfhZ7H4kszQ Background: Prostate cancer is regarded as one of the most common leading causes of male cancer-related death worldwide. Clinicians agree that prostate specific antigen (PSA) is the best prostate cancer predictor. High PSA levels increase prostate cancer risk in most men. However, other research suggests that prostate cancer with low PSA levels is aggressive. In this uncommon case series, we present three high-grade prostate cancer patients with low PSA. Case Description: Between 2018 and 2019, three patients were referred for further therapeutic management after initial evaluation and treatment from secondary hospitals. All patients underwent complete diagnostic procedures including Laboratory examination, Pathological examination, and Radiologic imaging. PSA levels were 0.67 ng/mL, 4.0 ng/ml, and 4.93 ng/mL in the first, second, and third patients, respectively. The first two of three patients had a Gleason score (GS) of 9 (5+4), and one patient presented with GS of 8 (5+3). Distant metastatic disease was not found in our series. All of the patients underwent hormonal therapy, and none of them underwent radical prostatectomy. Follow-ups were completed in all patients, with the survival of 3 months, 4 months, and 12 months respectively. Conclusion: High-grade prostate cancer in patients with low PSA levels emphasizes the need for rigorous history taking and physical examination and quick investigation of new biomarkers and criteria for prostate cancer detection. These patients' prognosis and optimal therapy are unknown. These patients have a worse prognosis than those with high PSA values, according to multiple studies.