immediately after polypectomy. The latter is particularly frequent there is not enough room for endoloop application due to a short polyp stalk. We report about the use of a simple and safe method combining the use of clips and endoloop. Methods: Patients with large pedunculated polyps ( 3 cm) were included. We used a prototype therapeutic sigmoidoscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), 80 cm long, equipped with two working channels (2.8 mm and 3.7 mm, respectively). One working channel has an up/down elevator. Using a “twohanded” approach, 2 clips were initially placed at the base of the stalk, on two opposite sides. In order to fix it securely, the endoloop was then placed at the base of the stalk below the two clips. To facilitate the procedure the endoloop was opened through one channel, the polyp was grabbed through the other channel by a tripod and then pulled inside the endoloop. Thus, the endoloop was subsequently firmly secured at the base of the stalk. If necessary, the same procedure was repeated to capture the polyp within the diathermic snare for resection. The procedures were performed under conscious sedation using meperidine and midazolam. Results: Twenty-five pedunculated polyps in 24 patients (13 F, 11 M; median age 59) were resected with the “clip and loop” technique. It was possible to place an endoloop successfully below the clips at the basis of the stalk and perform a resection in all cases. No major complication occurred. Particularly, in no case the endoloop fell off after resection. In comparison to the previous cases performed with the endoloop only, the success rate in terms of correct and durable endoloop placement was higher (100% vs. 84%). Conclusions: Application of endoloop below the clips is feasible and safe and prevents slipping off of the endoloop after polypectomy. Use of a combination of clips and endoloop is an effective prophylactic measure to prevent bleeding after polypectomy of large pedunculated polyps, also when the stalk is short.