Polluting bacteria can be faced by a wide range of stressing agents and conditions in the aquatic environment, and the ability to resist these and survive depends on several factors (1). First, survival can be significantly affected by the inherent make-up of the organisms, some strains being inherently more stress resistant than others, even without stress exposure (2). Second, tolerance will be markedly influenced by the presence of inducible stress tolerance mechanisms (3,4). Third, the growth-phase will be influential, tolerance being especially substantial in the stationary-phase (1). Additionally, organisms will show greater stress tolerance if able to attach to surfaces (5), since attached organisms are frequently resistant to stress, while recent studies imply that filamentation may be a means of circumventing damaging stress effects (6,7). The articles here (8-11) will consider how certain stresses damage and kill bacteria, and some responses to these stresses. It should be noted at the outset that, frequently, organisms are exposed to more than one stress at the same time i.e. with inducible responses an organism may have to set-in-train more than one such response at the same time. Exposure to low pH values is a condition occurring in many situations (12). In the aquatic environment, effluents from chemical works and agricultural establishments can acidify natural waters, and industrial operations can also lead to acidification, following the precipitation of acid rain and acid snow (12). Foodstuffs are also commonly acidic, and there are many locations in the animal and human body where low pH exposures are the norm (13,14). In any of these locations, polluting, contaminating or infecting bacteria will be subjected to acid stress. In most of the above situations, the baleful effects of exposure to acidity are exacerbated by the presence of weak acids. Organisms able to resist external acidity due to inherent or induced tolerance, may not be able to resist the very low internal pH caused by the combination of low external pH plus weak acids, and may also be killed by weak acids alone (8). Several areas considered by Hirshfield et al. (8) are of great interest. The induction of antibiotic resistance (mar operon) by weak acids (15) is of major public health interest because such acids in the intestine could induce pathogens to resistance. In connection with this, it is useful that studies are now being made of envelope changes that increase or decrease inherent tolerance to weak acids. These complement the earlier studies of the role of outer membrane (OM) components (particularly the PhoE and OmpA porins (16,17)) in determining inherent sensitivity or tolerance to inorganic acid. It is surprising and disappointing that it appears (8), that there have been virtually no studies of the regulation of tolerance responses associated with weak acids, although there is some information for the mar operon, with a repressor and a transcriptional activator involved (15,18). Obviously there is a strong likelihood that extracellular sensing and induction components function here (see below), but this is only part of the story, as essentially no studies have been made of (1) what sensors may be involved, or (2) how they signal the switching-on of the responses etc., etc. There are probably studies already in the literature which might throw light on some aspects of how responses involving weak acids are controlled. For example, Roe et al. (19), showed that growth inhibition by acetate led to the accumulation of homocysteine and to methionine starvation. Such an effect will, in many E. coli strains, lead to a stringent response, with the increased production of (p)ppGpp. These nucleotides are known to play a role in many regulatory processes, so there is a possibility that they could be involved in the switching-on of some of the responses induced by weak acids. The natural environment, especially the aquatic environment, can suffer pollution by basic materials; these can enter from chemical and agricultural sources and from run-off from basic soils (12). …
Read full abstract