Low-intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Research Articles

Focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Traditional treatments for localized prostate cancer include radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy but pose challenges due to treatment related side effects, namely erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence. In recent years, focal therapy has emerged as a viable treatment option for localized low-intermediate risk prostate cancer in carefully selected patients. Short and medium-term studies show acceptable cancer control outcomes and reduced morbidity when comparing focal therapy to whole gland treatment for prostate cancer, however there is paucity of long-term studies. Here we review focal ablative therapies commonly used, discuss the role of imaging in monitoring treatment, and summarize oncologic outcomes based on studies to date.

Transperineal Laser Ablation (TPLA) Treatment of Focal Low-Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.

Background: This interventional pilot study aimed to evaluate the short-term (3 years) efficacy of focal laser ablation (FLA) in treating the index lesion of low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer, along with assessing the safety of the procedure (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04045756). Methods: Forty patients aged between 46 and 86 with histologically proven organ-confined prostate cancer and low-to-intermediate progression risk were included. FLA was performed under percutaneous fusion magnetic resonance/ultrasound guidance in a Day Hospital setting under local anesthesia. Patients underwent regular clinical and functional assessments through the international index of erectile function (IIEF-5) and the International Prostatism Symptom Score (IPSS), PSA measurements, post-procedure MRI scans, and biopsies at 36 months or if positive findings were detected earlier. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess trends in PSA levels and cavity dimensions over time. Results: Forty patients were initially included, with fifteen lost to follow-up. At 36 months, a mean PSA reduction of 60% was observed, and 80% of MRI scans showed no signs of in-field clinically significant residual/recurrent cancer. Biopsies at 36 months revealed no malignant findings in 20 patients. No deterioration in sexual function or urinary symptoms was recorded. Conclusions: FLA appears to be safe, feasible, and effective in the index lesion treatment of low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with a high rate of tumor eradication and preservation of quality of life.

(237) Patient Reported Outcomes in Men Received Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Abstract Introduction Although focal therapy as a definite treatment modality for prostate cancer patients has been increasing in the United States, there has been paucity of patient reported outcome measures (PROM) specific to urinary, erectile, and sexual function Objective We aim to evaluate the long-term PROM in men undergone focal therapy for prostate cancer since 2019. Methods Web search was performed on the PubMed database. The search was limited to articles published in the English language and reporting focal therapy outcomes between 2019 and 2023, including randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies. The following data were extracted from each study: year, type of focal therapy, design, participants, demographic, IIEF, ED proportion, IPSS, EPIC, pad incontinence use, fistula rate, urinary retention rate, hematuria, Gleason scores, time to oncologic follow-up, recurrence, and presence of cancer after treatment. Results Twenty-three studies, consisting of cryotherapy, HIFU, TULSA, focal and microwave ablation where met the inclusion criteria and reviewed. Oncologic outcomes were reported in 17 of 23 studies. Median follow-up ranged from 3 to 42 months. Main oncologic outcomes analyzed were in-field/out-of-field recurrence and presence of prostate cancer after treatment. The two largest HIFU studies (n=90, n=101) had 9% and 24% respectively for clinically significant recurrence. The two focal microwave ablation studies (n=55, n=5) had 9% and 20% recurrence rates respectively. Functional outcomes were assessed by IPSS and IIEF. IPSS scores were consistent, with most studies reporting only minimal changes in IPSS after treatment. IIEF scores were generally consistent before and 6 months after procedure for all studies, with some reporting only marginal declines in erectile function. Complication rates among studies were low. Nine studies reported UTI rates ranging from 0% (n=6, n=41) to 30% (n=10) in a TULSA prospective study. Urinary retention rates were reported in 14 studies, with a range from 0% (n=41) to 30% (n=10). Conclusions This review suggests that focal therapies remain safe and effective treatment modality for patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. PROM pertaining to urinary and erectile functions in men undergone focal therapy modality seems to be adequate without worse oncological or complication outcomes. Larger data with oncological and functional outcomes is warranted to further validate its safety and efficacy over longer follow up period. Disclosure No.

(017) Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Focal Therapy Modality

Abstract Introduction Although focal therapy as a treatment modality for prostate cancer patients has been increasing in the United States, there has been a paucity of patient reported outcome measures (PROM) specific to urinary, erectile, and sexual function. Objective We aimed to systematically review the data of long-term PROM in men undergoing focal therapy for prostate cancer since 2019. Methods A web search was performed on the PubMed database. The search was limited to articles published in the English language and reporting focal therapy outcomes between 2019 and 2023, including randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies. The following data were extracted from each study: year, type of focal therapy, design, participants, demographic, IIEF, ED proportion, IPSS, EPIC, pad incontinence use, fistula rate, urinary retention rate, hematuria, Gleason scores, time to oncologic follow-up, recurrence, and presence of cancer after treatment. Results Twenty-three studies, consisting of cryotherapy, HIFU, TULSA, focal and microwave ablation met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Oncologic outcomes were reported in 17 of 23 studies. Median follow-up ranged from 3 to 42 months. Main oncologic outcomes analyzed were in-field/out-of-field recurrence and presence of prostate cancer after treatment. The two largest HIFU studies (n=90, n=101) had 9% and 24% respectively for clinically significant recurrence. The two focal microwave ablation studies (n=55, n=5) had 9% and 20% recurrence rates respectively. Functional outcomes were assessed by IPSS and IIEF. IPSS scores were consistent, with most studies reporting only minimal changes in IPSS after treatment. IIEF scores were generally consistent before and 6 months after procedure for all studies, with some reporting only marginal declines in erectile function. Complication rates among studies were low. Nine studies reported UTI rates ranging from 0% (n=6, n=41) to 30% (n=10) in a TULSA prospective study. Urinary retention rates were reported in 14 studies, with a range from 0% (n=41) to 30% (n=10). Conclusions This review suggests that focal therapies remain safe and effective treatment modality for patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. PROM pertaining to urinary and erectile functions in men undergone focal therapy modality seems to be adequate without worse oncological or complication outcomes. Larger data with oncological and functional outcomes is warranted to further validate its safety and efficacy over a longer follow up period. Disclosure No.

Using active surveillance for Gleason 7 (3+4) prostate cancer: A narrative review.

The interest in broadening the application of active surveillance (AS) has been increasing, encompassing patients who may not strictly adhere to the conventional criteria for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), particularly those diagnosed with small-volume Gleason grade group 2 disease. Nonetheless, accurately identifying individuals with low intermediate-risk PCa who can safely undergo AS without facing disease progression remains a challenge.This review aims to delve into the progression of this evolving trend specifically within this cohort of men, while also examining strategies aimed at minimizing irreversible disease advancement. Additionally, we address the criteria for patient selection, recommended followup schedules, and the indicators prompting intervention.

Population-based patient-reported quality of life outcomes following low-dose-rate versus high-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer.

To evaluate patient reported quality of life outcomes (QoL) following low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) monotherapy for prostate cancer at a population-based setting. The study comprised men with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer in the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry Victoria (PCOR-Vic), who were treated with LDR-BT or HDR-BT monotherapy between 2015 and 2020 and completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire 12-month post-treatment. Men who had ADT were excluded (n = 12). Differences in substantial symptoms (i.e. 'moderate' or 'big' problem on a 5-point Likert scale) between LDR-BT and HDR-BT arms were evaluated using Pearson's chi-squared test. Multivariable linear regressions were used to estimate differences in EPIC-26 urinary, bowel and sexual functional domain scores between LDR-BT and HDR-BT arms. Overall, 198 men were included in this study, of which 167 (84%) had LDR-BT and 31 (16%) had HDR-BT. 9 (4.6%), 10 (5.1%) and 56 (28%) reported substantial symptoms for overall urinary, bowel and sexual function at 12-month post-treatment, with no significant difference between LDR-BT and HDR-BT arms. The adjusted mean differences in urinary incontinence, urinary obstructive, bowel and sexual function domain scores between LDR-BT and HDT-BT were: -3.53 (-8.21 to 1.14), -1.27 (-6.88 to 4.35), -0.01 (-5.63 to 5.63) and -8.68 (-21.44 to 4.07) respectively - these were not statistically significant and did not meet the minimal clinically important difference. This is the first Australian population-based study comparing QoL in men who had LDR-BT and HDR-BT, with no statistically or clinically significant differences in QoL observed at 12-month post-treatment.

MO-0218 SABR with boost to the DIL in low-intermediate risk prostate cancer: a dose escalation trial

MO-0218 SABR with boost to the DIL in low-intermediate risk prostate cancer: a dose escalation trial

PO-1499 Extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy in low and favourable intermediate risk prostate cancer

PO-1499 Extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy in low and favourable intermediate risk prostate cancer

Expanding the role of PSMA PET in active surveillance

IntroductionAccurate grading at the time of diagnosis is fundamental to risk stratification and treatment decision making, particularly for men being considered for Active Surveillance (AS). With the introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) there has been considerable improvement in sensitivity and specificity for the detection and staging of clinically significant prostate cancer. Our study aims to determine the role of PSMA PET/CT in men with newly diagnosed low or favourable intermediate risk prostate cancer to better select men for AS.MethodThis is a retrospective single centre study performed from January 2019 and October 2022. This study includes men identified from electronic medical record system who had undergone a PSMA PET/CT following newly diagnosed low or favourable-intermediate risk prostate cancer. Primary outcome was to assess the change in management for men being considered for AS following PSMA PET/CT results on the basis of PSMA PET characteristics.ResultsIn total, there were 11 of 30 men (36.67%) who were assigned management by AS and 19 of 30 men (63.33%) who had definitive treatment. 15 of the 19 men that needed treatment had concerning features on PSMA PET/CT results. Of the 15 men with concerning features on PSMA PET, 9 (60%) men were found to have adverse pathological features on final prostatectomy features.ConclusionThis retrospective study suggests that PSMA PET/CT has potential to influence the management of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer that would otherwise be appropriate for active surveillance.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-blind, 2-Arm Intervention Study Evaluating the Adverse Events and Quality of Life After Irreversible Electroporation for the Ablation of Localized Low-intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer. Reply.

No AccessJournal of UrologyReply to Letters to the Editor16 Mar 2023A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-blind, 2-Arm Intervention Study Evaluating the Adverse Events and Quality of Life After Irreversible Electroporation for the Ablation of Localized Low-intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer. Reply. Kai Zhang, Jeremy Teoh, Pilar Laguna, Chi-Fai Ng, and Jean de la Rosette Kai ZhangKai Zhang Department of Urology, Beijing United Family Hospital and Clinics, Beijing, China More articles by this author , Jeremy TeohJeremy Teoh S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China More articles by this author , Pilar LagunaPilar Laguna Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author , Chi-Fai NgChi-Fai Ng S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China More articles by this author , and Jean de la RosetteJean de la Rosette Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003405AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-blind, 2-Arm Intervention Study Evaluating the Adverse Events and Quality of Life After Irreversible Electroporation for the Ablation of Localized Low-intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer. Reply.." The Journal of Urology, Publish Ahead of Print, pp. – REFERENCES 1. . A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, 2-arm intervention study evaluating the adverse events and quality of life after irreversible electroporation for the ablation of localized low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. J Urol.2023; 209(2):347-353. Link, Google Scholar 2. . Focal therapy in prostate cancer-report from a consensus panel. J Endourol. 2010; 24(5):775-780. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 3. . Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol.2015; 68(3):438-450. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 4. . Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Urol.2020; 17(1):41-61. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 5. . Transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy combined with standard template improves prostate cancer detection. J Urol.2022; 207(1):86-94. Link, Google Scholar 6. . Schema and cancer detection rates for transperineal prostate biopsy templates: a review. Ther Adv Urol.2022; 14:175628722211050. Crossref, Google Scholar 7. . EAU—EANM—ESTRO—ESUR—ISUP—SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer—2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol.2021; 79(2):243-262. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 8. . Effect of focal vs extended irreversible electroporation for the ablation of localized low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer on early oncological control: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg.2023. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.7516. Crossref, Google Scholar 9. . An updated systematic review on focal therapy in localized prostate cancer: what has changed over the past 5 years?Eur Urol.2022; 81(1):5-33. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 10. . Pair-matched patient-reported quality of life and early oncological control following focal irreversible electroporation versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol.2018; 36(9):1383-1389. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar Submitted February 26, 2023; accepted March 2, 2023; published 000. © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Kai Zhang Department of Urology, Beijing United Family Hospital and Clinics, Beijing, China More articles by this author Jeremy Teoh S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China More articles by this author Pilar Laguna Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author Chi-Fai Ng S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China More articles by this author Jean de la Rosette Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author Expand All Submitted February 26, 2023; accepted March 2, 2023; published 000. Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

SC172 - Focal therapy cryoablation in low-intermediate risk prostate cancer: preliminary single-center experience with oncologic and functional outcomes with a short-term follow-up

SC172 - Focal therapy cryoablation in low-intermediate risk prostate cancer: preliminary single-center experience with oncologic and functional outcomes with a short-term follow-up

Retzius-Sparing vs Modified Anatomical Structure Preserving and Retzius-Repairing Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparison on Functional Outcomes with a 1-Year Follow-Up.

Objectives: To compare the short-term and 1-year follow-up functional outcomes of modified anatomical structure preserving and Retzius-repairing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (APR-RARP) compared with Retzius-sparing (RS) RARP. Methods: Eighty consecutive patients 40-75 years of age with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer were prospectively randomized to APR-RARP or RS-RARP. Urinary continence (UC) recovery rates were evaluated from catheter removal up to 1 year follow-up. Postoperative UC was defined as 0 pads/one security pad per day. UC recovery rates from catheter removal to 1 year were calculated by Kaplan-Meier curve; log-rank test was used for the curve comparison. Postoperative potency was evaluated at 3 and 12 months after surgeries. Perioperative complications, positive surgical margin (PSM), and biochemical recurrence rates represent secondary outcomes reported in the study. Results: At the catheter removal, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, 52.5% (confidence interval [CI] 95%: 37.6-67), 82.5% (CI 95%: 70.8-94), 95% (CI 95%: 88.3-99.1), 97.5% (CI 95%: 92.5-99.9), and 97.5% (CI 95%: 92.5-99.9) of men undergoing the APR-RARP were continent (0 pads/one security pad per day), compared with 61.5% (CI 95%: 46.5-76.6), 89.7% (CI 95%: 80.3-98.1), 97.5% (CI 95%: 92.6-99.9), 97.5% (CI 95%: 92.6-99.9), and 97.5% (CI 95%: 92.6-99.9) undergoing the RS-RARP, respectively, and the Kaplan Meier curve showed no statistically significant difference for both technique at any time point (log-rank p = 0.556). The median (95% CI) time to UC recovery was 9.8 (5.2-14.4) days for the APR-RARP vs 6.7 (3.2-10.2) days for the RS-RARP group. Potency rates were similar in both groups at 3 and 12 months after surgeries. The two compared approaches; in terms of rate of complications, PSM was similar. Conclusions: Surgeons can achieve functional results comparable to the RS technique with the modified reconstructive anterior approach, without changing the surgical technique they are used to.

A Feasibility Study of the Therapeutic Response and Durability of Short-term Androgen-targeted Therapy in Early Prostate Cancer Managed with Surveillance: The Therapeutics in Active Prostate Surveillance (TAPS01) Study

BackgroundActive surveillance (AS) is a preferred management option for men with prostate cancer with favourable prognosis. However, nearly half of men on AS switch to treatment within 5 years, so therapeutic strategies to prevent or delay disease progression could be considered. The androgen receptor is the pre-eminent oncogenic driver in prostate cancer. ObjectiveTo explore image-based tumour responses and the patient impact of short-duration androgen-targeted therapy (ATT) to abrogate disease progression during AS. Design, setting, and participantsMen on AS with Cambridge Prognostic Group 1 & 2 (low and favourable intermediate risk) prostate cancer and lesions visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were recruited to an open-label, single-centre, phase 2 feasibility study of short-term ATT (the TAPS01 study). InterventionApalutamide 240 mg was administered for 90 days. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisMRI-measured tumour volume (TV), gland volume (GV), and the TV/GV ratio were calculated at baseline, at day 90 (end of treatment), and at 6- and 18-month follow-up. Quality of life metrics were measured at day 0, day 90, and 6 weeks after ATT. Results and limitationsEleven patients (40% of eligible men approached) agreed to participate, of whom nine completed treatment. At day 90, the median percentage reduction was −38.2% (range −51.8% to −23.5%) for GV, −54.2% (range −74.1% to −13.8%) for TV, and −27.2% (range −61.5% to −7.5%) for TV/GV (all p < 0.0001). At 6 mo, while GV had returned to baseline (p = 0.95) both TV (−31.9%; p = 0.0007) and TV/GV (−28.7%; p = 0.0009) remained significantly reduced. This reduction was sustained at 18 months (TV −18%, TV/GV −23.8%; p = 0.01). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL core 30-item questionnaire scores for global, physical, role, and social functioning decreased during treatment, but all were recovering by 6 weeks. EQ-VAS scores were unchanged compared to baseline. ConclusionsTAPS01 has demonstrated feasibility and patient tolerability for short-term ATT in men on AS. Our data suggest a selective and durable antitumour effect in the short term and support a larger-scale randomised trial. Patient summaryWe investigated the feasibility of short-term treatment with an androgen inhibitor to prevent or delay disease progression for men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Results for a small group of patients show that 90-day treatment led to a sustained decrease in tumour volume over 18 months. The findings warrant a larger clinical trial for this approach, which could allow patients to delay or even avoid longer-term active treatments.

A0473 - PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions are the risk factors for biochemical recurrence in the low-intermediate risk prostate cancer

A0473 - PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions are the risk factors for biochemical recurrence in the low-intermediate risk prostate cancer

Understanding reasons for non-adherence to active surveillance for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer.

BackgroundActive surveillance (AS) is recommended by most national medical organizations as the preferred treatment option for men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, studies report that up to one third of men on AS dropout within 5 years, without evidence of disease progression. Despite high dropout rates, few studies have purposively explored the opinions and experiences of men who discontinued AS. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the reasons why some men on AS for PCa discontinue active treatment without evidence of disease progression.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were undertaken with 14 men from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds who had been on AS for PCa but dropped out of surveillance to undergo active treatment without signs of disease progression. Purposive sampling to reach data saturation was used to select participants based on their experience of AS and willingness to share their experiences. Interviews were transcribed and analysis undertaken in an inductive thematic manner.ResultsThe following themes arose from interviews as factors that potentially influence adherence to AS: men’s experience at diagnosis and follow-up consultations, involvement in shared decision-making, the extent of supportive care and information, administrative procedures and support from partner and peers. A poor experience during diagnosis could adversely influence long-term adherence to AS, given the same diagnostic tests are frequently repeated. The provision of consistent information and support while on AS, similar to that offered to men undergoing radical treatment, was also highlighted as being important to increase confidence in the process.ConclusionsEffective communications skills among health professionals, aimed at building trust in patient-clinician relationships, providing opportunities for shared decision-making and developing self-efficacy, along with structured information and support, are key to enhancing long-term adherence to AS.

A prospective validation of the genomic classifier to define high-metastasis risk in a subset of African American men with early localized prostate cancer: VanDAAM study.

5005 Background: Risk stratification of prostate cancer (PC) using routine clinical variables remains suboptimal as they do not account for underlying tumor biology. The genomic classifier provides information on underlying biology and independently predicts an individual patient’s risk of metastasis. Although the performance of the genomic classifier has been tested across different cohorts primarily comprised of White men, its validation as an optimal genomic risk classifier for African American men (AAM) is thus far lacking in a prospective trial. We report the initial results on the prospective validation of the genomic classifier in a matched cohort of AAM and non-AAM (NAAM). Methods: This was a multisite, prospective validation trial of the genomic classifier i.e. Decipher score in AAM. Participants were recruited on a 1:1 enrollment ratio of AAM to NAAM diagnosed with low-intermediate risk PC. Patient on active surveillance were ineligible. NAAM were matched to AAM on PSA, age, biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage, and percent positive biopsy cores. Diagnostic biopsy specimens were processed at a CLIA certified laboratory and Decipher score was assessed using whole transcriptome profiling platform. Total target accrual was 250 men treated for low-intermediate PC over three years. Statistical analyses include categorical comparison of race dependent risk group migration between NCCN risk group and genomic classifier. Relative risk of metastasis was estimated using negative binomial model. Results: Final analytical cohort included 207 evaluable cases (AAM = 102 and NAAM = 107) with comprehensive genomic information. Risk of metastasis was determined based on pretreatment biopsy Decipher score, and patients were classified as low, favorable-, and unfavorable intermediate risk. Despite achieving a robustly matched clinical cohort, we observed significant genomic heterogeneity between AAM and NAAM across NCCN risk groups. In a comparative analysis, 49% of low-favorable intermediate risk AAM harbored high genomic risk tumors as compared to only 10% NAAM, p = 0.02. Similarly, using the modified clinico-genomic risk classifier (cGC), comprised of both Decipher score and clinical variables, AAM experienced an extreme deviation of risk status (difference [δ] between cGC and NCCN ≥ 2) as compared to NAAM (26.8% vs 8.1%, p = 0.03). In a binomial model, low-favorable NCCN risk AAM were 3.9 times more likely to be reclassified as high genomic risk for distant metastasis compared to NAAM (RR = 3.99, 95% CI, 1.15 – 13.86, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Clinical NCCN risk classification is an inadequate surrogate of tumor biology and offers suboptimal risk stratification for AAM with PC. Integration of patient specific genomic classifier into standard of care will improve accuracy in disease risk classification and treatment recommendations for AAM. Clinical trial information: NCT02723734.

Evaluation of daily online contour adaptation by radiation therapists for prostate cancer treatment on an MRI-guided linear accelerator

Background and purposeMagnetic resonance (MR)-guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) systems have changed radiotherapy workflows. The addition of daily online contour adaptation allows for higher precision treatment, but also increases the workload of those involved. We train radiation therapists (RTTs) to perform daily online contour adaptation for MR-Linac treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate these prostate contours by performing an interfraction and interobserver analysis. Materials and methodsClinical target volume (CTV) contours generated online by RTTs from 30 low-intermediate risk PCa patients, treated with 5x7.25 Gy, were used. Two physicians (Observers) judged the RTTs contours and performed adaptations when necessary. Interfraction relative volume differences between the first and the subsequent fractions were calculated for the RTTs, Observer 1, and Observer 2. Additionally, interobserver dice’s similarity coefficient (DSC) for fraction 2–5 was calculated with the RTTs- and physician-adapted contours. Clinical acceptability of the RTTs contours was judged by a third observer. ResultsMean (SD) online contour adaptation time was 12.6 (±3.8) minutes and overall median (interquartile range [IQR]) relative volume difference was 9.3% (4.4–13.0). Adaptations by the observers were mostly performed at the apex and base of the prostate. Median (IQR) interobserver DSC between RTTs and Observer 1, RTTs and Observer 2, and Observer 1 and 2 was 0.99 (0.98–1.00), 1.00 (0.98–1.00), and 1.00 (0.99–1.00), respectively. Contours were acceptable for clinical use in 113 (94.2%) fractions. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis showed significant CTV underdosage for one of the seven identified outliers. ConclusionDaily online contour adaptation by RTTs is clinically feasible for MR-Linac treatment of PCa.

The efficacy and tolerability of ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy in low-intermediate risk prostate cancer patients: single center experience

Background We aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (UHRT) in the treatment of low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. Methods This retrospective study was conducted using data derived from 44 patients who underwent UHRT, and toxicity assessment and clinical response were investigated. Treatment consisted of 35–36.25 Gy in 5 fractions using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with the Linac-based delivery system. Results The median duration of follow-up was 52 months (8–68 months) and the median age was 71.5 years (54–85 years). Twenty-seven patients were assigned as intermediate-risk, whereas 17 patients had low-risk. The 5-year overall survival rate was 87.8%, while the 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) rate was 97.4%. Acute grade 3 genitourinary (GU) side effect was not observed in any patient, whereas acute gastrointestinal (GI) system grade 3 side effect was seen in 6.8% of the patients. Late grade 3 GU and GI side effects were seen in 4.6% and 6.8% of the patients, respectively. In patients with planning target volume (PTV) ≥85 ml, acute grade ≥2 GU side effects were more common (p=.034). Conclusion Our data demonstrated that UHRT administered with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) can be recommended for selected patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. Further prospective, multicentric, controlled trials on larger series are warranted to reach more accurate conclusions.

Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: An Overview of Toxicity and Dose Response

Ultrahypofractionationed radiation therapy for prostate cancer is increasingly studied and adopted. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Biological Effects of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy therefore aimed to review studies examining toxicity and quality of life after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer and model its effect. We performed a systematic PubMed search of prostate SBRT studies published between 2001 and 2018. Those that analyzed factors associated with late urinary, bowel, or sexual toxicity and/or quality of life were included and reviewed. Normal tissue complication probability modelling was performed on studies that contained detailed dose/volume and outcome data. We found 13 studies that examined urinary effects, 6 that examined bowel effects, and 4 that examined sexual effects. Most studies included patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer treated to 35-40 Gy. Most patients were treated with 5 fractions, with several centers using 4 fractions. Endpoints were heterogeneous and included both physician-scored toxicity and patient-reported quality of life. Most toxicities were mild-moderate (eg, grade 1-2) with a very low overall incidence of severe toxicity (eg, grade 3 or higher, usually <3%). Side effects were associated with both dosimetric and non-dosimetric factors. Prostate SBRT appears to be overall well tolerated, with determinants of toxicity that include dosimetric factors and patient factors. Suggested dose constraints include bladder V(Rx Dose)Gy <5-10 cc, urethra Dmax <38-42 Gy, and rectum Dmax <35-38 Gy, though current data do not offer firm guidance on tolerance doses. Several areas for future research are suggested.

Systemic Inflammatory Markers Are Predictive of the Response to Brachytherapy in the Prostate.

We analyzed the influence of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on the biochemical recurrence (BCR) in low-intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa). A total of 604 patients treated with exclusive brachytherapy for low- and intermediate-risk cancers were included in this study. No patient received either androgen deprivation or brachytherapy as a boost. BCR was defined according to the Phoenix definition (nadir prostatic specific antigen (PSA) +2). The median follow-up was 60 months (IQR 44–48 months). An NLR > 3 was more frequent in statin users (p = 0.025), but not in diabetics (p = 0.079). In univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA), a NLR > 3 (MVA p = 0.03), as well as Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) low- vs. intermediate-risk (MVA p = 0.04), were predictive of BCR. When combining the NLR score with the CAPRA risk group, CAPRA intermediate risk patients with an NLR ≤ 3 (n = 157) had the worst (p = 0.0276) BCR rates, with a 5-year recurrence-free survival (p = 0.004, Bonferroni correction for six comparisons p = 0.024). We were able to identify a subgroup of PCa patients with CAPRA intermediate-risk and an NLR ≤ 3 who had worse BCR. This is in contrast to most other cancers, which have a worse prognosis when the NLR is high.